Treatment planning considerations for the development of FLASH proton therapy

Discordance in Acute Gastrointestinal Toxicity between Synchrotron-Based Proton and Linac-based Electron Ultra-High Dose Rate Irradiation

PURPOSE

Proton FLASH has been investigated using cyclotron and synchrocyclotron beamlines but not synchrotron beamlines. We evaluated the impact of dose rate [ultra-high vs conventional (CONV)] and beam configuration [shoot-through (S-T) vs spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP)] on acute radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity (RIGIT) in mice. We also compared RIGIT between synchrotron-based protons and linac-based electrons with matched mean dose rates.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We administered abdominal irradiation (12-14 Gy single fraction) to female C57BL/6J mice with an 87-MeV synchrotron-based proton beamline (2-cm-diameter field size as a lateral beam). Dose rates were 0.2 Gy/s (S-T pCONV), 0.3 Gy/s (SOBP pCONV), 150 Gy/s (S-T pFLASH), and 230 Gy/s (SOBP pFLASH). RIGIT was assessed by the jejunal regenerating crypt assay and survival. We also compared responses to proton (pFLASH and pCONV) with responses to electron CONV (eCONV, 0.4 Gy/s) and electron-beam FLASH (188-205 Gy/s).

RESULTS

The number of regenerating jejunal crypts at each matched dose was lowest for pFLASH (similar between S-T and SOBP), greater and similar between pCONV (S-T and SOBP) and eCONV, and greatest for electron-beam FLASH. Correspondingly, mice that received pFLASH SOBP had the lowest survival rates (50% at 50 days), followed by pFLASH S-T (80%), and pCONV SOBP (90%), but 100% of mice receiving pCONV S-T survived (log-rank P = .047 for the 4 groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings are consistent with an increase in RIGIT after synchrotron-based pFLASH versus pCONV. This negative proton-specific FLASH effect versus linac-based electron irradiation underscores the importance of understanding the physical and biological factors that will allow safe and effective clinical translation.

Anticipating potential bottlenecks in adaptive proton FLASH therapy: a ridge filter reuse strategy

Objective.Achieving FLASH dose rate with pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy is challenging. However, utilizing a single energy layer with a ridge filter (RF) can maintain dose rate and conformality. Yet, changes in patient anatomy over the treatment course can render the RF obsolete. Unfortunately, creating a new RF is time-consuming, thus, incompatible with online adaptation. To address this, we propose to re-optimize the spot weights while keeping the same initial RF.Approach.Data from six head and neck cancer patients with a repeated computed tomography (CT2) were used. FLASH treatment plans were generated with three methods on CT2: 'full-adaptation' (FA), optimized from scratch with a new RF; 'spot-adaptation only' (SAO), re-using initial RF but adjusting plan spot weights; and 'no adaptation' (NoA) where the dose from initial plans on initial CT (CT1) was recomputed on CT2. The prescribed dose per fraction was 9 Gy. Different beam angles were tested for each CT2(1 beam per fraction). The FA, SAO and NoA plans were then compared on CT2.Main results.Fractions with SAO showed a median decrease of 0.05 Gy forD98% and a median increase of 0.03 Gy forD2% of CTV when compared to their homologous FA plans on nominal case. Median conformity number decreased by 0.03. Median max dose to spinal cord increased by 0.09 Gy. The largest median increase in mean dose to organs was 0.03 Gy to the mandible. The largest observed median difference in organs receiving a minimal dose rate of 40 Gy s-1was 0.5% for the mandible. Up to 16 of the 20 evaluated SAO fractions were thus deemed clinically acceptable, with up to 8 NoA plans already acceptable before adaptation.Significance.Proposed SAO workflow showed that for most of our evaluated plans, daily reprinting of RF was not necessary.

Very High-Energy Electron Therapy Toward Clinical Implementation

The use of very high energy electron (VHEE) beams, with energies between 50 and 400 MeV, has drawn considerable interest in radiotherapy due to their deep tissue penetration, sharp beam edges, and low sensitivity to tissue density. VHEE beams can be precisely steered with magnetic components, positioning VHEE therapy as a cost-effective option between photon and proton therapies. However, the clinical implementation of VHEE therapy (VHEET) requires advances in several areas: developing compact, stable, and efficient accelerators; creating sophisticated treatment planning software; and establishing clinically validated protocols. In addition, the perspective of VHEE to access ultra-high dose-rate regime presents a promising avenue for the practical integration of FLASH radiotherapy of deep tumors and metastases with VHEET (FLASH-VHEET), enhancing normal tissue sparing while maintaining the inherent dosimetric advantages of VHEET. However, FLASH-VHEET systems require validation of time-dependent dose parameters, thus introducing additional technological challenges. Here, we discuss recent progress in VHEET research, focusing on both conventional and FLASH modalities, and covering key aspects including dosimetric properties, radioprotection, accelerator technology, beam focusing, radiobiological effects, and clinical outcomes. Furthermore, we comprehensively analyze initial VHEET in silico studies on coverage across various tumor sites.

Proton FLASH-arc therapy (PFAT): A feasibility study for meeting FLASH dose-rate requirements in the clinic

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Proton arc therapy and FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT) each offer unique advantages in proton therapy. However, clinical translation of FLASH-RT faces challenges in defining and delivering high dose rates. We propose the use of proton FLASH-arc therapy (PFAT) to leverage the benefits of arc while addressing FLASH delivery concerns by spatially fractionating dose delivery to healthy tissue.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment plans for an abdominal phantom and a clinical brain case were designed in OpenTPS, using monoenergetic beams within a 360-degree gantry rotation. Beams were optimized to achieve target coverage while maximizing spatial fractionation in non-target regions. The temporal dose delivery to healthy-tissue voxels, or in specified organs-at-risk (OARs), was constrained via selective spot removal in the beamlets matrix. The dose, LET, number of spots per voxel, and voxel-wise average dose rate were calculated for each PFAT plan and compared to a corresponding IMPT scenario.

RESULTS

PFAT plans demonstrated comparable dose conformity to IMPT, with LET hotspots shifted towards the target center. The number of spots influencing healthy-tissue voxels was reduced, leading to regions of substantially higher dose rates in many points outside the target. OAR dose-rate optimization in the brain plan resulted in dose rates exceeding 40 Gy/s in the majority of points in the brainstem.

CONCLUSION

The PFAT technique combines the advantages of FLASH and arc therapy, providing improved LET distributions and enhanced biological effect in the target, while achieving high dose rates in healthy tissue, thus reducing healthy tissue damage. This feasibility study demonstrates the capability of PFAT, setting the foundation for further optimization and application in diverse patient cases and complex geometries.

Hybrid ultra-high and conventional dose rate treatments with electrons and photons for the clinical transfer of FLASH-RT to deep-seated targets: A treatment planning study

PURPOSE

This study explores the dosimetric feasibility and plan quality of hybrid ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron and conventional dose rate (CDR) photon (HUC) radiotherapy for treating deep-seated tumours with FLASH-RT.

METHODS

HUC treatment planning was conducted optimizing a broad UHDR electron beam (between 20-250 MeV) combined with a CDR VMAT for a glioblastoma, a pancreatic cancer, and a prostate cancer case. HUC plans were based on clinical prescription and fractionation schemes and compared against clinically delivered plans. Considering a HUC boost treatment for the glioblastoma consisting of a 15-Gy-single-fraction UHDR electron boost supplemented with VMAT, two scenarios for FLASH sparing were assessed using FLASH-modifying-factor-weighted doses.

RESULTS

For all three patient cases, HUC treatment plans demonstrated comparable dosimetric quality to clinical plans, with similar PTV coverage (V95% within 0.5 %), homogeneity, and critical OAR-sparing. At the same time, HUC plans delivered a substantial portion of the dose to the PTV (Dmedian of 50-69 %) and surrounding tissues at UHDR. For the HUC boost treatment of the glioblastoma, the first FLASH sparing scenario showed a moderate FLASH sparing magnitude (10 % for D2%,PTV) for the 15-Gy UHDR electron boost, while the second scenario indicated a more substantial sparing of brain tissues inside and outside the PTV (32 % for D2%,PTV, 31 % for D2%,Brain).

CONCLUSIONS

From a planning perspective, HUC treatments represent a feasible approach for delivering dosimetrically conformal UHDR treatments, potentially mitigating technical challenges associated with delivering conformal FLASH-RT for deep-seated tumours. While further research is needed to optimize HUC fractionation and delivery schemes for specific patient cohorts, HUC treatments offer a promising avenue for the clinical transfer of FLASH-RT.

A Novel Dose Rate Optimization Method to Maximize Ultrahigh-Dose-Rate Coverage of Critical Organs at Risk Without Compromising Dosimetry Metrics in Proton Pencil Beam Scanning FLASH Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate a dose rate optimization framework based on the spot-scanning patterns to improve ultrahigh-dose-rate coverage of critical organs at risk (OARs) for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) FLASH radiation therapy (ultrahigh dose-rate (often referred to as >40 Gy per second) delivery) and present implementation of a genetic algorithm (GA) method for spot sequence optimization to achieve PBS FLASH dose rate optimization under relatively low nozzle beam currents.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

First, a multifield FLASH plan was developed to meet all the dosimetric goals and optimal FLASH dose rate coverage by considering the deliverable minimum monitor unit constraint. Then, a GA method was implemented into the in-house treatment platform to maximize the dose rate by exploring the best spot delivery sequence. A phantom study was performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the dose rate optimization. Then, 10 consecutive plans for patients with lung cancer previously treated using PBS intensity-modulated proton therapy were optimized using 45 GyRBE in 3 fractions for both transmission and Bragg peak FLASH radiation therapy for further validation. The spot delivery sequence of each treatment field was optimized using this GA. The ultrahigh-dose-rate-volume histogram and dose rate coverage V40GyRBE/s were investigated to assess the efficacy of dose rate optimization quantitatively.

RESULTS

Using a relatively low monitor unit/spot of 150, corresponding to a nozzle beam current of 65 nA, the FLASH dose rate ratio V40GyRBE/s of the OAR contour of the core was increased from 0% to ∼60% in the phantom study. In the patients with lung cancer, the ultrahigh-dose-rate coverage V40GyRBE/s was improved from 15.2%, 15.5%, 17.6%, and 16.0% before the delivery sequence optimization to 31.8%, 43.5%, 47.6%, and 30.5% after delivery sequence optimization in the lungs-GTV (gross tumor volume), spinal cord, esophagus, and heart (for all, P < .001). When the beam current increased to 130 nA, V40GyRBE/s was improved from 45.1%, 47.1%, 51.2%, and 51.4% to 65.3%, 83.5%, 88.1%, and 69.4% (P < .05). The averaged V40GyRBE/s for the target and OARs increased from 12.9% to 41.6% and 46.3% to 77.5% for 65 and 130 nA, respectively, showing significant improvements based on a clinical proton system. After optimizing the dose rate for the Bragg peak FLASH technique with a beam current of 340 nA, the V40GyRBE/s values for the lung GTV, spinal cord, esophagus, and heart were increased by 8.9%, 15.8%, 22%, and 20.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

An optimal plan quality can be maintained as the spot delivery sequence optimization is a separate independent process after the plan optimization. Both the phantom and patient results demonstrated that novel spot delivery sequence optimization can effectively improve the ultrahigh-dose-rate coverage for critical OARs, which can potentially be applied in clinical practice for better OARs-sparing efficacy.

Recording and reporting of ultra-high dose rate "FLASH" delivery for preclinical and clinical settings

Treatments at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) have the potential to improve the therapeutic index of radiation therapy (RT) by sparing normal tissues compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. Insufficient and inconsistent reporting in physics and dosimetry of preclinical and translational studies may have contributed to a reproducibility crisis of radiobiological data in the field. Consequently, the development of a common terminology, as well as common recording, reporting, dosimetry, and metrology standards is required. In the context of UHDR irradiations, the temporal dose delivery parameters are of importance, and under-reporting of these parameters is also a concern.This work proposes a standardization of terminology, recording, and reporting to enhance comparability of both preclinical and clinical UHDR studies and and to allow retrospective analyses to aid the understanding of the conditions which give rise to the FLASH effect.

Towards clinical application of ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy and the FLASH effect: Challenges and current status

Ultra-high dose rate external beam radiotherapy (UHDR-RT) uses dose rates of several tens to thousands of Gy/s, compared with the dose rate of the order of a few Gy/min for conventional radiotherapy techniques, currently used in clinical practice. The use of such dose rate is likely to improve the therapeutic index by obtaining a radiobiological effect, known as the "FLASH" effect. This would maintain tumor control while enhancing tissues protection. To date, this effect has been achieved using beams of electrons, photons, protons, and heavy ions. However, the conditions required to achieve this "FLASH" effect are not well defined, and raise several questions, particularly with regard to the definition of the prescription, including dose fractionation, irradiated volume and the temporal structure of the pulsed beam. In addition, the dose delivered over a very short period induces technical challenges, particularly in terms of detectors, which must be mastered to guarantee safe clinical implementation. IRSN has carried out an in-depth literature review of the UHDR-RT technique, covering various aspects relating to patient radiation protection: the radiobiological mechanisms associated with the FLASH effect, the used temporal structure of the UHDR beams, accelerators and dose control, the properties of detectors to be used with UHDR beams, planning, clinical implementation, and clinical studies already carried out or in progress.

The Potential and Challenges of Proton FLASH in Head and Neck Cancer Reirradiation

Ultrahigh-dose-rate therapy, also known as FLASH radiotherapy (RT), is an emerging technique that is garnering significant interest in cancer treatment due to its potential to revolutionize therapy. This method can achieve comparable tumor control to conventional-dose-rate RT while offering the enhanced protection of normal tissue through the FLASH-sparing effect. This innovative technique has demonstrated promising results in preclinical studies involving animals and cell lines. Particularly noteworthy is its potential application in treating head and neck (HN) cancers, especially in patients with challenging recurrent tumors and reirradiation cases, where the toxicity rates with conventional radiotherapy are high. Such applications aim to enhance tumor control while minimizing side effects and preserving patients' quality of life. In comparison to electron or photon FLASH modalities, proton therapy has demonstrated superior dosimetric and delivery characteristics and is a safe and effective FLASH treatment for human malignancies. Compared to the transmission proton FLASH, single-energy Bragg peak FLASH is a novel delivery method that allows highly conformal doses to targets and minimal radiation doses to crucial OARs. Proton Bragg peak FLASH for HN cancer has still not been well studied. This review highlights the significance of proton FLASH in enhancing cancer therapy by examining the advantages and challenges of using it for HN cancer reirradiation.

Discordance in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between synchrotron-based proton and linac-based electron ultra-high dose rate irradiation

Purpose

Proton FLASH has been investigated using cyclotron and synchrocyclotron beamlines but not synchrotron beamlines. We evaluated the impact of dose rate (ultra-high [UHDR] vs. conventional [CONV]) and beam configuration (shoot-through [ST] vs. spread-out-Bragg-peak [SOBP]) on acute radiation-induced gastrointestinal toxicity (RIGIT) in mice. We also compared RIGIT between synchrotron-based protons and linac-based electrons with matched mean dose rates.

Methods and Materials

We administered abdominal irradiation (12-14 Gy single fraction) to female C57BL/6J mice with an 87 MeV synchrotron-based proton beamline (2 cm diameter field size as a lateral beam). Dose rates were 0.2 Gy/s (S-T pCONV), 0.3 Gy/s (SOBP pCONV), 150 Gy/s (S-T pFLASH), and 230 Gy/s (SOBP pFLASH). RIGIT was assessed by the jejunal regenerating crypt assay and survival. We also compared responses to proton [pFLASH and pCONV] with responses to electron CONV (eCONV, 0.4 Gy/s) and electron FLASH (eFLASH, 188-205 Gy/s).

Results

The number of regenerating jejunal crypts at each matched dose was lowest for pFLASH (similar between S-T and SOBP), greater and similar between pCONV (S-T and SOBP) and eCONV, and greatest for eFLASH. Correspondingly, mice that received pFLASH SOBP had the lowest survival rates (50% at 50 days), followed by pFLASH S-T (80%), and pCONV SOBP (90%), but 100% of mice receiving pCONV S-T survived (log-rank P = 0.047 for the four groups).

Conclusions

Our findings are consistent with an increase in RIGIT after synchrotron-based pFLASH versus pCONV. This negative proton-specific FLASH effect versus linac-based electron irradiation underscores the importance of understanding the physical and biological factors that will allow safe and effective clinical translation.

Quantitative, real-time scintillation imaging for experimental comparison of different dose and dose rate estimations in UHDR proton pencil beams

BACKGROUND

Ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy (UHDR-RT) has demonstrated normal tissue sparing capabilities, termed the FLASH effect; however, available dosimetry tools make it challenging to characterize the UHDR beams with sufficiently high concurrent spatial and temporal resolution. Novel dosimeters are needed for safe clinical implementation and improved understanding of the effect of UHDR-RT.

PURPOSE

Ultra-fast scintillation imaging has been shown to provide a unique tool for spatio-temporal dosimetry of conventional cyclotron pencil beam scanning (PBS) deliveries, indicating the potential use for characterization of UHDR PBS proton beams. The goal of this work is to introduce this novel concept and demonstrate its capabilities in recording high-resolution dose rate maps at FLASH-capable proton beam currents, as compared to log-based dose rate calculation, internally developed UHDR beam simulation, and a fast point detector (EDGE diode).

METHODS

The light response of a scintillator sheet located at isocenter and irradiated by PBS proton fields (40-210 nA, 250 MeV) was imaged by an ultra-fast iCMOS camera at 4.5-12 kHz sampling frequency. Camera sensor and image intensifier gain were optimized to maximize the dynamic range; the camera acquisition rate was also varied to evaluate the optimal sampling frequency. Large field delivery enabled flat field acquisition for evaluation of system response homogeneity. Image intensity was calibrated to dose with film and the recorded spatio-temporal data was compared to a PPC05 ion chamber, log-based reconstruction, and EDGE diode. Dose and dose rate linearity studies were performed to evaluate agreement under various beam conditions. Calculation of full-field mean and PBS dose rate maps were calculated to highlight the importance of high resolution, full-field information in UHDR studies.

RESULTS

Camera response was linear with dose (R2 = 0.997) and current (R22 = 0.98) in the range from 2-22 Gy and 40-210 nA, respectively, when compared to ion chamber readings. The deviation of total irradiation time calculated with the imaging system from the log file recordings decreased from 0.07% to 0.03% when imaging at 12 kfps versus 4.5 kfps. Planned and delivered spot positions agreed within 0.2 ± $\pm$ 0.1 mm and total irradiation time agreed within 0.2 ± $\pm$ 0.2 ms when compared with the log files, indicating the high concurrent spatial and temporal resolution. For all deliveries, the PBS dose rate measured at the diode location agreed between the imaging and the diode within 3% ± $\pm$ 2% and with the simulation within 5% ± $\pm$ 3% CONCLUSIONS: Full-field mapping of dose and dose rate is imperative for complete understanding of UHDR PBS proton dose delivery. The high linearity and various spatiotemporal metric reporting capabilities confirm the continued use of this camera system for UHDR beam characterization, especially for spatially resolved dose rate information.

Dose Rate Effects from the 1950s through to the Era of FLASH

Numerous dose rate effects have been described over the past 6-7 decades in the radiation biology and radiation oncology literature depending on the dose rate range being discussed. This review focuses on the impact and understanding of altering dose rates in the context of radiation therapy, but does not discuss dose rate effects as relevant to radiation protection. The review starts with a short historic review of early studies on dose rate effects, considers mechanisms thought to underlie dose rate dependencies, then discusses some current issues in clinical findings with altered dose rates, the importance of dose rate in brachytherapy, and the current timely topic of the use of very high dose rates, so-called FLASH radiotherapy. The discussion includes dose rate effects in vitro in cultured cells, in in vivo experimental systems and in the clinic, including both tumors and normal tissues. Gaps in understanding dose rate effects are identified, as are opportunities for improving clinical use of dose rate modulation.

Characterization of a commercial plastic scintillator for electron FLASH dosimetry

PURPOSE

This study investigated the potential of a commercially available plastic scintillator, the Exradin W2, as a real-time dosimeter for ultra-high-dose-rate (UHDR) electron beams. This work aimed to characterize this system's performance under UHDR conditions and addressed limitations inherent to other conventional dosimetry systems.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We assessed the W2's performance as a UHDR electron dosimeter using a 16 MeV UHDR electron beam from the FLASH research extension (FLEX) system. Additionally, the vendor provided a beta firmware upgrade to better handle the processing of the high signal generated in the UHDR environment. We evaluated the W2 regarding dose-per-pulse, pulse repetition rate, charge versus distance, and pulse linearity. Absorbed dose measurements were compared against those from a plane-parallel ionization chamber, optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters and radiochromic film.

RESULTS

We observed that the 1 × 1 mm W2 scintillator with the MAX SD was more suitable for UHDR dosimetry compared to the 1 × 3 mm W2 scintillator, capable of matching film measurements within 2% accuracy for dose-per-pulse up to 3.6 Gy/pulse. The W2 accurately ascertained the inverse square relationship regarding charge versus virtual source distance with R2 of ∼1.00 for all channels. Pulse linearity was accurately measured with the W2, demonstrating a proportional response to the delivered pulse number. There was no discernible impact on the measured charge of the W2 when switching between the available repetition rates of the FLEX system (18-180 pulses/s), solidifying consistent beam output across pulse frequencies.

CONCLUSIONS

This study tested a commercial plastic scintillator detector in a UHDR electron beam, paving the way for its potential use as a real-time, patient-specific dosimetry tool for future FLASH radiotherapy treatments. Further research is warranted to test and improve the signal processing of the W2 dosimetry system to accurately measure in UHDR environments using exceedingly high dose-per-pulse and pulse numbers.

A Novel Inverse Algorithm To Solve the Integrated Optimization of Dose, Dose Rate, and Linear Energy Transfer of Proton FLASH Therapy With Sparse Filters

PURPOSE

The recently proposed Integrated Physical Optimization Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy (IPO-IMPT) framework allows simultaneous optimization of dose, dose rate, and linear energy transfer (LET) for ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) treatment planning. Finding solutions to IPO-IMPT is difficult because of computational intensiveness. Nevertheless, an inverse solution that simultaneously specifies the geometry of a sparse filter and weights of a proton intensity map is desirable for both clinical and preclinical applications. Such solutions can reduce effective biologic dose to organs at risk in patients with cancer as well as reduce the number of animal irradiations needed to derive extra biologic dose models in preclinical studies.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Unlike the initial forward heuristic, this inverse IPO-IMPT solution includes simultaneous optimization of sparse range compensation, sparse range modulation, and spot intensity. The daunting computational tasks vital to this endeavor were resolved iteratively with a distributed computing framework to enable Simultaneous Intensity and Energy Modulation and Compensation (SIEMAC). SIEMAC was demonstrated on a human patient with central lung cancer and a minipig.

RESULTS

SIEMAC simultaneously improves maps of spot intensities and patient-field-specific sparse range compensators and range modulators. For the patient with lung cancer, at our maximum nozzle current of 300 nA, dose rate coverage above 100 Gy/s increased from 57% to 96% in the lung and from 93% to 100% in the heart, and LET coverage above 4 keV/µm dropped from 68% to 9% in the lung and from 26% to <1% in the heart. For a simple minipig plan, the full-width half-maximum of the dose, dose rate, and LET distributions decreased by 30%, 1.6%, and 57%, respectively, again with similar target dose coverage, thus reducing uncertainty in these quantities for preclinical studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The inverse solution to IPO-IMPT demonstrated the capability to simultaneously modulate subspot proton energy and intensity distributions for clinical and preclinical studies.

Commissioning and initial validation of Eclipse eMC algorithm for the electron FLASH research extension (FLEX) system for pre-clinical studies

PURPOSE

To investigate the feasibility of commissioning the 16 MeV electron FLASH Extension (FLEX) in the commercial treatment planning system (TPS) for biomedical research with cell and mouse models, and in silico treatment planning studies.

METHODS

To commission the FLEX system with the electron Monte Carlo (eMC) algorithm in the commercial TPS, radiochromic film was used to measure the vendor-recommended beam data. Once the beam model was generated for the eMC algorithm, supplemental measurements were collected for validation purposes and compared against the TPS-calculated results. Additionally, the newly commissioned 16 MeV FLASH beam was compared to the corresponding 16 MeV conventional electron beam.

RESULTS

The eMC algorithm effectively modeled the FLEX system. The eMC-calculated PDDs and profiles for the 16 MeV electron FLASH beam agreed with measured values within 1%, on average, for 6 × 6 cm2 and 10 × 10 cm2 applicators. Flatness and symmetry deviated by less than 1%, while FWHM and penumbra agreed within 1 mm for both eMC-calculated and measured profiles. Additionally, the small field (i.e., 2-cm diameter cutout) that was measured for validation purposes agreed with TPS-calculated results within 1%, on average, for both the PDD and profiles. The FLASH and conventional dose rate 16 MeV electron beam were in agreement in regard to energy, but the profiles for larger field sizes began to deviate (>10 × 10 cm2) due to the forward-peaked nature of the FLASH beam. For cell irradiation experiments, the measured and eMC-calculated in-plane and cross-plane absolute dose profiles agreed within 1%, on average.

CONCLUSIONS

The FLEX system was successfully commissioned in the commercial TPS using the eMC algorithm, which accurately modeled the forward-peaked nature of the FLASH beam. A commissioned TPS for FLASH will be useful for pre-clinical cell and animal studies, as well as in silico FLASH treatment planning studies for future clinical implementation.

FLASH Radiotherapy: What Can FLASH's Ultra High Dose Rate Offer to the Treatment of Patients With Sarcoma?

FLASH is an emerging treatment paradigm in radiotherapy (RT) that utilizes ultra-high dose rates (UHDR; >40 Gy)/s) of radiation delivery. Developing advances in technology support the delivery of UHDR using electron and proton systems, as well as some ion beam units (eg, carbon ions), while methods to achieve UHDR with photons are under investigation. The major advantage of FLASH RT is its ability to increase the therapeutic index for RT by shifting the dose response curve for normal tissue toxicity to higher doses. Numerous preclinical studies have been conducted to date on FLASH RT for murine sarcomas, alongside the investigation of its effects on relevant normal tissues of skin, muscle, and bone. The tumor control achieved by FLASH RT of sarcoma models is indistinguishable from that attained by treatment with standard RT to the same total dose. FLASH's high dose rates are able to mitigate the severity or incidence of RT side effects on normal tissues as evaluated by endpoints ranging from functional sparing to histological damage. Large animal studies and clinical trials of canine patients show evidence of skin sparing by FLASH vs. standard RT, but also caution against delivery of high single doses with FLASH that exceed those safely applied with standard RT. Also, a human clinical trial has shown that FLASH RT can be delivered safely to bone metastasis. Thus, data to date support continued investigations of clinical translation of FLASH RT for the treatment of patients with sarcoma. Toward this purpose, hypofractionated irradiation schemes are being investigated for FLASH effects on sarcoma and relevant normal tissues.

Development and benchmarking of a dose rate engine for raster-scanned FLASH helium ions

BACKGROUND

Radiotherapy with charged particles at high dose and ultra-high dose rate (uHDR) is a promising technique to further increase the therapeutic index of patient treatments. Dose rate is a key quantity to predict the so-called FLASH effect at uHDR settings. However, recent works introduced varying calculation models to report dose rate, which is susceptible to the delivery method, scanning path (in active beam delivery) and beam intensity.

PURPOSE

This work introduces an analytical dose rate calculation engine for raster scanned charged particle beams that is able to predict dose rate from the irradiation plan and recorded beam intensity. The importance of standardized dose rate calculation methods is explored here.

METHODS

Dose is obtained with an analytical pencil beam algorithm, using pre-calculated databases for integrated depth dose distributions and lateral penumbra. Dose rate is then calculated by combining dose information with the respective particle fluence (i.e., time information) using three dose-rate-calculation models (mean, instantaneous, and threshold-based). Dose rate predictions for all three models are compared to uHDR helium ion beam (145.7 MeV/u, range in water of approximatively 14.6 cm) measurements performed at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) with a diamond-detector prototype. Three scanning patterns (scanned or snake-like) and four field sizes are used to investigate the dose rate differences.

RESULTS

Dose rate measurements were in good agreement with in-silico generated distributions using the here introduced engine. Relative differences in dose rate were below 10% for varying depths in water, from 2.3 to 14.8 cm, as well as laterally in a near Bragg peak area. In the entrance channel of the helium ion beam, dose rates were predicted within 7% on average for varying irradiated field sizes and scanning patterns. Large differences in absolute dose rate values were observed for varying calculation methods. For raster-scanned irradiations, the deviation between mean and threshold-based dose rate at the investigated point was found to increase with the field size up to 63% for a 10 mm × 10 mm field, while no significant differences were observed for snake-like scanning paths.

CONCLUSIONS

This work introduces the first dose rate calculation engine benchmarked to instantaneous dose rate, enabling dose rate predictions for physical and biophysical experiments. Dose rate is greatly affected by varying particle fluence, scanning path, and calculation method, highlighting the need for a consensus among the FLASH community on how to calculate and report dose rate in the future. The here introduced engine could help provide the necessary details for the analysis of the sparing effect and uHDR conditions.

FLASH radiotherapy sparing effect on the circulating lymphocytes in pencil beam scanning proton therapy: impact of hypofractionation and dose rate

Purpose. The sparing effect of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) radiotherapy has been reported, but its potential to mitigate depletion of circulating blood and lymphocytes (CL) has not been investigated in pencil-beam scanning-based (PBS) proton therapy, which could potentially reduce the risk of radiation-induced lymphopenia.Material and methods. A time-dependent framework was used to score the dose to the CL during the course of radiotherapy. For brain patients, cerebral vasculatures were semi-automatic segmented from 3T MR-angiography data. A dynamic beam delivery system was developed capable of simulating spatially varying instantaneous dose rates of PBS treatment plans, and which is based on realistic beam delivery parameters that are available clinically. We simulated single and different hypofractionated PBS intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) FLASH schemes using 600 nA beam current along with conventionally fractionated IMPT treatment plan at 2 nA beam current. The dosimetric impact of treatment schemes on CL was quantified, and we also evaluated the depletion in subsets of CL based on their radiosensitivity.Results. The proton FLASH sparing effect on CL was observed. In single-fraction PBS FLASH, just 1.5% of peripheral blood was irradiated, whereas hypofractionated FLASH irradiated 7.3% of peripheral blood. In contrast, conventional fractionated IMPT exposed 42.4% of peripheral blood to radiation. PBS FLASH reduced the depletion rate of CL by 69.2% when compared to conventional fractionated IMPT.Conclusion. Our dosimetric blood flow model provides quantitative measures of the PBS FLASH sparing effect on the CL in radiotherapy for brain cancer. FLASH Single treatment fraction offers superior CL sparing when compared to hypofractionated FLASH and conventional IMPT, supporting assumptions about reducing risks of lymphopenia compared to proton therapy at conventional dose rates. The results also indicate that faster conformal FLASH delivery, such as passive patient-specific energy modulation, may further enhance the sparing of the immune system.

A Novel Ultrahigh-Dose-Rate Proton Therapy Technology: Spot-Scanning Proton Arc Therapy + FLASH (SPLASH)

PURPOSE

To take full advantage of FLASH dose rate (40 Gy/s) and high-dose conformity, we introduce a novel optimization and delivery technique, the spot-scanning proton arc therapy (SPArc) + FLASH (SPLASH).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

SPLASH framework was implemented in an open-source proton planning platform (MatRad, Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center). It optimizes with the clinical dose-volume constraint based on dose distribution and the dose-average dose rate by minimizing the monitor unit constraint on spot weight and accelerator beam current sequentially, enabling the first dynamic arc therapy with voxel-based FLASH dose rate. This new optimization framework minimizes the overall cost function value combined with plan quality and voxel-based dose-rate constraints. Three representative cases (brain, liver, and prostate cancer) were used for testing purposes. Dose-volume histogram, dose-rate-volume histogram, and dose-rate map were compared among intensity modulated proton radiation therapy (IMPT), SPArc, and SPLASH.

RESULTS

SPLASH/SPArc could offer superior plan quality over IMPT in terms of dose conformity. The dose-rate-volume histogram results indicated SPLASH could significantly improve V40 Gy/s in the target and region of interest for all tested cases compared with SPArc and IMPT. The optimal beam current per spot is simultaneously generated, which is within the existing proton machine specifications in the research version (<200 nA).

CONCLUSIONS

SPLASH offers the first voxel-based ultradose-rate and high-dose conformity treatment using proton beam therapy. Such a technique has the potential to fit the needs of a broad range of disease sites and simplify clinical workflow without applying a patient-specific ridge filter, which has never before been demonstrated.

Definition of dose rate for FLASH pencil-beam scanning proton therapy: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

FLASH proton therapy has the potential to reduce side effects of conventional proton therapy by delivering a high dose of radiation in a very short period of time. However, significant progress is needed in the development of FLASH proton therapy. Increasing the dose rate while maintaining dose conformality may involve the use of advanced beam-shaping technologies and specialized equipment such as 3D patient-specific range modulators, to take advantage of the higher transmission efficiency at the highest energy available. The dose rate is an important factor in FLASH proton therapy, but its definition can vary because of the uneven distribution of the dose over time in pencil-beam scanning (PBS).

PURPOSE

Highlight the distinctions, both in terms of concept and numerical values, of the various definitions that can be established for the dose rate in PBS proton therapy.

METHODS

In an in silico study, five definitions of the dose rate, namely the PBS dose rate, the percentile dose rate, the maximum percentile dose rate, the average dose rate, and the dose averaged dose rate (DADR) were analyzed first through theoretical comparison, and then applied to a head and neck case. To carry out this study, a treatment plan utilizing a single energy level and requiring the use of a patient-specific range modulator was employed. The dose rate values were compared both locally and by means of dose rate volume histograms (DRVHs).

RESULTS

The PBS dose rate, the percentile dose rate, and the maximum percentile dose are definitions that are specifically designed to take into account the time structure of the delivery of a PBS treatment plan. Although they may appear similar, our study shows that they can vary locally by up to 10%. On the other hand, the DADR values were approximately twice as high as those of the PBS, percentile, and maximum percentile dose rates, since the DADR disregards the periods when a voxel does not receive any dose. Finally, the average dose rate can be defined in various ways, as discussed in this paper. The average dose rate is found to be lower by a factor of approximately 1/2 than the PBS, percentile, and maximum percentile dose rates.

CONCLUSIONS

We have shown that using different definitions for the dose rate in FLASH proton therapy can lead to variations in calculated values ranging from a few percent to a factor of two. Since the dose rate is a critical parameter in FLASH radiation therapy, it is essential to carefully consider the choice of definition. However, to make an informed decision, additional biological data and models are needed.

Single Ultra-High Dose Rate Proton Transmission Beam for Whole Breast FLASH-Irradiation: Quantification of FLASH-Dose and Relation with Beam Parameters

Healthy tissue-sparing effects of FLASH (≥40 Gy/s, ≥4-8 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy (RT) make it potentially useful for whole breast irradiation (WBI), since there is often a lot of normal tissue within the planning target volume (PTV). We investigated WBI plan quality and determined FLASH-dose for various machine settings using ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) proton transmission beams (TBs). While five-fraction WBI is commonplace, a potential FLASH-effect might facilitate shorter treatments, so hypothetical 2- and 1-fraction schedules were also analyzed. Using one tangential 250 MeV TB delivering 5 × 5.7 Gy, 2 × 9.74 Gy or 1 × 14.32 Gy, we evaluated: (1) spots with equal monitor units (MUs) in a uniform square grid with variable spacing; (2) spot MUs optimized with a minimum MU-threshold; and (3) splitting the optimized TB into two sub-beams: one delivering spots above an MU-threshold, i.e., at UHDRs; the other delivering the remaining spots necessary to improve plan quality. Scenarios 1-3 were planned for a test case, and scenario 3 was also planned for three other patients. Dose rates were calculated using the pencil beam scanning dose rate and the sliding-window dose rate. Various machine parameters were considered: minimum spot irradiation time (minST): 2 ms/1 ms/0.5 ms; maximum nozzle current (maxN): 200 nA/400 nA/800 nA; two gantry-current (GC) techniques: energy-layer and spot-based. For the test case (PTV = 819 cc) we found: (1) a 7 mm grid achieved the best balance between plan quality and FLASH-dose for equal-MU spots; (2) near the target boundary, lower-MU spots are necessary for homogeneity but decrease FLASH-dose; (3) the non-split beam achieved >95% FLASH for favorable (not clinically available) machine parameters (SB GC, low minST, high maxN), but <5% for clinically available settings (EB GC, minST = 2 ms, maxN = 200 nA); and (4) splitting gave better plan quality and higher FLASH-dose (~50%) for available settings. The clinical cases achieved ~50% (PTV = 1047 cc) or >95% (PTV = 477/677 cc) FLASH after splitting. A single UHDR-TB for WBI can achieve acceptable plan quality. Current machine parameters limit FLASH-dose, which can be partially overcome using beam-splitting. WBI FLASH-RT is technically feasible.

Proton Beam Therapy in the Oligometastatic/Oligorecurrent Setting: Is There a Role? A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with conventional photon radiotherapy (XRT) are well-established treatment options for selected patients with oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease. The use of PBT for SABR-SRS is attractive given the property of a lack of exit dose. The aim of this review is to evaluate the role and current utilisation of PBT in the oligometastatic/oligorecurrent setting.

METHODS

Using Medline and Embase, a comprehensive literature review was conducted following the PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes) criteria, which returned 83 records. After screening, 16 records were deemed to be relevant and included in the review.

RESULTS

Six of the sixteen records analysed originated in Japan, six in the USA, and four in Europe. The focus was oligometastatic disease in 12, oligorecurrence in 3, and both in 1. Most of the studies analysed (12/16) were retrospective cohorts or case reports, two were phase II clinical trials, one was a literature review, and one study discussed the pros and cons of PBT in these settings. The studies presented in this review included a total of 925 patients. The metastatic sites analysed in these articles were the liver (4/16), lungs (3/16), thoracic lymph nodes (2/16), bone (2/16), brain (1/16), pelvis (1/16), and various sites in 2/16.

CONCLUSIONS

PBT could represent an option for the treatment of oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease in patients with a low metastatic burden. Nevertheless, due to its limited availability, PBT has traditionally been funded for selected tumour indications that are defined as curable. The availability of new systemic therapies has widened this definition. This, together with the exponential growth of PBT capacity worldwide, will potentially redefine its commissioning to include selected patients with oligometastatic/oligorecurrent disease. To date, PBT has been used with encouraging results for the treatment of liver metastases. However, PBT could be an option in those cases in which the reduced radiation exposure to normal tissues leads to a clinically significant reduction in treatment-related toxicities.