1
|
Li Z, Lin Z, Liu H, Xiao R, Lin C, Zhu W, Luo J, Xu S, Chi F, He H. Treatment Continuity and Bone Marrow Suppression in Whole-Brain and Whole-Spinal Cord Radiotherapy for Medulloblastoma Patients. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2024; 18:11795549241286431. [PMID: 39371257 PMCID: PMC11456176 DOI: 10.1177/11795549241286431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 09/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background This study investigated the factors influencing treatment continuity and bone marrow suppression in whole-brain and whole-spinal cord radiotherapy for medulloblastoma, providing a clinical reference for mitigating the impact of hematological suppression on radiotherapy continuity. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with medulloblastoma who underwent craniospinal irradiation (CSI) radiotherapy at our hospital between August 2019 and December 2023. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 87 patients were enrolled. The bone marrow suppression status, clinical data, and radiotherapy dose data of the enrolled patients were recorded, and correlation analyses were performed. Based on the correlation results, further group comparisons were subsequently conducted. Results Overall, 22.99% (20 out of 87) of the patients experienced treatment interruption (median duration, 6.5 [5, 8] days), typically during the 12th (7.5, 14.75) radiotherapy session. Treatment continuity was weakly correlated with age and treatment modality, and the timing of interruptions was weakly correlated with dosage and treatment modality. Bone marrow suppression severity was weakly correlated with age, body mass index (BMI), and treatment modality. Treatment modality and age were found to be independent predictors of treatment continuity and the degree of bone marrow suppression, respectively. Subgroup comparisons revealed differences in the severity of bone marrow suppression, grade of hematological toxicity, and timing of interruption depending on the treatment modality, dosage, and sex (P < .05). Conclusions Timely monitoring of hematological changes, especially in the middle and posterior segments after radiotherapy, is crucial. Treatment with helical tomotherapy, male sex, younger age, and lower BMI during radiotherapy are indicators of greater clinical attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Runnan Xiao
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chuyan Lin
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenlong Zhu
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiaxiu Luo
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Senku Xu
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Feng Chi
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huilang He
- Department of Radiotherapy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ziemann C, Cremers F, Motisi L, Albers D, MacPherson M, Rades D. Novel hybrid treatment planning approach for irradiation a pediatric craniospinal axis. Med Dosim 2023; 49:93-101. [PMID: 37798155 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Revised: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
This study presents a new treatment planning approach merging 3D-CRT and VMAT fields into a hybrid treatment plan (HybTP), in order to achieve an optimum dose coverage of the planning target volume (PTV) and protection of OAR. Craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) treated with 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) is associated with high doses to the heart and eye lenses but provides better sparing of lungs and kidneys compared to volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). VMAT treatment spares eye lenses and the heart, but lungs and kidneys are not as effective as 3D-CRT. Thus, a combination of both techniques (HybTP) may be optimal in sparing all these organs at risk (OAR). The results of HybTP are compared with helical tomotherapy (HT), intensity modulated radio therapy (IMRT), VMAT, and 3D-CRT plans. Hybrid, HT, VMAT, IMRT, and 3D-CRT treatment plans for a male child (age 6 years) with medulloblastoma were created and compared. A total dose of 35.2 Gy (PTV) with a dose per fraction of 1.6 Gy was prescribed. The following dose acceptance criteria were defined: The plans were compared regarding dose homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index (CI), PTV coverage, (particularly at cribriform plate) and doses at OARs. Best conformity was achieved with HT (CI = 0.98) followed by VMAT (CI = 0.96), IMRT (CI = 0.91), HybTP (CI = 0.86), and 3D-CRT (CI = 0.83). The homogeneity index varied marginally. For both HT and IMRT the HI was 0.07, and for 3D-CRT, VMAT and HybTP the HI was between 0.13 and 0.15. The cribriform plate was sufficiently covered by HybTP, VMAT, and 3D-CRT. The dose acceptance criteria for OARs were met by HT and HybTP. VMAT did not meet the criteria for lung (Dmean = right 10.4 Gy/left 10.2 Gy), 3D-CRT did not meet the criteria for eye lenses (Dmax = right 32.3 Gy/left 33.1), and heart (V25≈44%) and IMRT did not meet the criteria for lung (Dmean = right 11.1 Gy/left 11.2 Gy) and eye lenses (Dmax = right 12.2 Gy/left 13.1). HybTP meets all defined acceptance criteria and has proved to be a reasonable alternative for CSI. With HybTP that combines VMAT at the brain and heart with 3D-CRT posterior spinal fields (to spare lungs and kidneys), both appropriate coverage of the PTV and sparing of OAR can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Ziemann
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein/Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
| | - Florian Cremers
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein/Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| | - Laura Motisi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Suisse
| | - Dirk Albers
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Miller MacPherson
- University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital, Department of Radiology, Radiation Oncology, and Medical Physics, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Dirk Rades
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Schleswig Holstein/Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Turcas A, Kelly SM, Clementel E, Cernea D. Tomotherapy for Cranio-Spinal Irradiation. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 38:96-103. [PMID: 36407491 PMCID: PMC9672131 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 11/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Tomotherapy is safe and effective for cranio-spinal irradiation, both in paediatric patients and in adults, with similar disease-specific outcomes and toxicities as other techniques such as 3DCRT or IMRT/VMAT. Tomotherapy offers several technical advantages when compared to other radiotherapy techniques such as higher target conformity and better dose homogeneity. Helical Tomotherapy provides good organ-at-risk sparing for several structures, especially the vertebrae, parotids, and optic system. Reported treatment time/ beam-on-time is longer with helical Tomotherapy compared to other techniques.
Tomotherapy is a method of delivering rotational IMRT offering various advantages, notably for complex and large targets such as the cranio-spinal axis. This systematic literature review reports on main clinical outcomes and toxicities in patients with various cancer types that received whole craniospinal axis irradiation (CSI) using Tomotherapy and offers a comprehensive comparison between Tomotherapy and other radiotherapy delivery techniques. Databases including PubMed, PubMed Central, Embase, and Cochrane were searched using the keywords “tomotherapy” AND “craniospinal”. Fifty-six papers were included in the review. Patient population was adult in 9 papers, paediatric in 26 papers and mixed in 14 papers. Patients treated with helical Tomotherapy had similar disease-specific clinical outcomes and toxicities as patients treated using other techniques. Compared to any other technique, Tomotherapy provides better target coverage, homogeneity, and conformity in 23, 34 and 22 reports. Tomotherapy showed better organ-at-risk sparing for the thyroid, parotids, cochlea, eyes, heart and esophagus. Beam-On-Time (BOT) was reported to be longer for Tomotherapy in most studies (Median BOT: HT = 11 min, VMAT = 5.49 min, 3DCRT = 1.46 min). In conclusion, Tomotherapy offers good cranio-spinal axis coverage with improved homogeneity and conformity compared to other techniques, but with a considerably longer treatment time. Clinical outcome and toxicities suggest using Tomotherapy for CSI is efficient and safe.
Collapse
|
4
|
Öztunali A, Elsayad K, Scobioala S, Channaoui M, Haverkamp U, Grauer O, Sträter R, Brentrup A, Stummer W, Kerl K, Eich HT. Toxicity Reduction after Craniospinal Irradiation via Helical Tomotherapy in Patients with Medulloblastoma: A Unicentric Retrospective Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030501. [PMID: 33525583 PMCID: PMC7865289 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Recent trials with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) via helical Tomotherapy (HT) demonstrated encouraging medulloblastoma results. In this study, we assess the toxicity profile of different radiation techniques and estimate survival rates. Materials and Methods: We reviewed the records of 46 patients who underwent irradiation for medulloblastoma between 1999 and 2019 (27 conventional radiotherapy technique (CRT) and 19 HT). Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics, as well as treatment outcomes-local control rate (LCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS)-were reviewed. Acute and late adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) criteria. Results: In total, 43 courses of CSI and three local RT were administered to the 46 patients: 30 were male, the median age was 7 years (range 1-56). A median total RT dose of 55 Gy (range 44-68) and a median CSI dose of 35 Gy (range, 23.4-40) was delivered. During follow-up (median, 99 months), six patients (13%) developed recurrence. The EFS rate after 5 years was 84%. The overall OS rates after 5 and 10 years were 95% and 88%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Following HT, a trend towards lower grade 2/3 acute upper gastrointestinal (p = 0.07) and subacute CNS (p = 0.05) toxicity rates was detected compared to CRT-group. The risk of late CNS toxicities, mainly grade 2/3, was significantly lower following HT technique (p = 0.003). Conclusion: CSI via HT is an efficacious treatment modality in medulloblastoma patients. In all, we detected a reduced rate of several acute, subacute, and chronic toxicities following HT compared to CRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Öztunali
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Khaled Elsayad
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-0-2518347384
| | - Sergiu Scobioala
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Mohammed Channaoui
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Uwe Haverkamp
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| | - Oliver Grauer
- Neuro-Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany;
| | - Ronald Sträter
- Pediatric Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (R.S.); (K.K.)
| | - Angela Brentrup
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.B.); (W.S.)
| | - Walter Stummer
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.B.); (W.S.)
| | - Kornelius Kerl
- Pediatric Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (R.S.); (K.K.)
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Radiation Oncology Department, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany; (A.Ö.); (S.S.); (M.C.); (U.H.); (H.T.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Devecka M, Duma MN, Wilkens JJ, Kampfer S, Borm KJ, Münch S, Straube C, Combs SE. Craniospinal irradiation(CSI) in patients with leptomeningeal metastases: risk-benefit-profile and development of a prognostic score for decision making in the palliative setting. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:501. [PMID: 32487151 PMCID: PMC7268696 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06984-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of our study was to assess the feasibility and oncologic outcomes in patients treated with spinal (SI) or craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in patients with leptomeningeal metastases (LM) and to suggest a prognostic score as to which patients are most likely to benefit from this treatment. METHODS Nineteen patients treated with CSI at our institution were eligible for the study. Demographic data, primary tumor characteristics, outcome and toxicity were assessed retrospectively. The extent of extra-CNS disease was defined by staging CT-scans before the initiation of CSI. Based on outcome parameters a prognostic score was developed for stratification based on patient performance status and tumor staging. RESULTS Median follow-up and overall survival (OS) for the whole group was 3.4 months (range 0.5-61.5 months). The median overall survival (OS) for patients with LM from breast cancer was 4.7 months and from NSCLC 3.3 months. The median OS was 7.3 months, 3.3 months and 1.5 months for patients with 0, 1 and 2 risk factors according to the proposed prognostic score (KPS < 70 and the presence of extra-CNS disease) respectively. Nonhematologic toxicities were mild. CONCLUSION CSI demonstrated clinically meaningful survival that is comparable to the reported outcome of intrathecal chemotherapy. A simple scoring system could be used to better select patients for treatment with CSI in this palliative setting. In our opinion, the feasibility of performing CSI with modern radiotherapy techniques with better sparing of healthy tissue gives a further rationale for its use also in the palliative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Devecka
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, München, Germany.
| | - Marciana Nona Duma
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, München, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of the Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
| | - Jan J Wilkens
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Severin Kampfer
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Kai Joachim Borm
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Stefan Münch
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, München, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK)-Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Straube
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, München, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Klinikum rechts der Isar, Department of RadiationOncology, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, München, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK)-Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Innovative Radiotherapy, Helmholtzzentrum München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rafic KHM, Sujith C, Rajesh B, Babu S ES, Timothy PB, Selvamani B, Ravindran PB. A new strategy for craniospinal axis localization and adaptive dosimetric evaluation using cone beam CT. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:282-292. [PMID: 32140087 PMCID: PMC7052077 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2019.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Computational complexities encountered in craniospinal irradiation (CSI) have been widely investigated with different planning strategies. However, localization of the entire craniospinal axis (CSA) and evaluation of adaptive treatment plans have traditionally been ignored in CSI treatment. In this study, a new strategy for CSI with comprehensive CSA localization and adaptive plan evaluation has been demonstrated using cone beam CT with extended longitudinal field-of-view (CBCTeLFOV). MATERIALS AND METHODS Multi-scan CBCT images were acquired with fixed longitudinal table translations (with 1 cm cone-beam overlap) and then fused into a single DICOM-set using the custom software coded in MatLab™. A novel approach for validation of CBCTeLFOV was demonstrated by combined geometry of Catphan-504 and Catphan-604 phantoms. To simulate actual treatment scenarios, at first, the end-to-end workflow of CSI with VMAT was investigated using an anthropomorphic phantom and then applied for two patients (based on random selection). RESULTS The fused CBCTeLFOV images were in excellent agreement with planning CT (pCT). The custom developed software effectively manages spatial misalignments arising out of the uncertainties in treatment/setup geometry. Although the structures mapped from pCT to CBCTeLFOV showed minimal variations, a maximum spatial displacement of up to 1.2 cm (and the mean of 0.8 ± 0.3 cm) was recorded in phantom study. Adaptive plan evaluation of patient paradigms showed the likelihood of under-dosing the craniospinal target. CONCLUSION Our protocol serves as a guide for precise localization of entire CSA and to ensure adequate dose to the large and complex targets. It can also be adapted for other complex treatment techniques such as total-marrow-irradiation and total-lymphoid-irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Peace Balasingh Timothy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore 632 004, Tamil Nadu, India
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Seravalli E, Bosman M, Lassen-Ramshad Y, Vestergaard A, Oldenburger F, Visser J, Koutsouveli E, Paraskevopoulou C, Horan G, Ajithkumar T, Timmermann B, Fuentes CS, Whitfield G, Marchant T, Padovani L, Garnier E, Gandola L, Meroni S, Hoeben BAW, Kusters M, Alapetite C, Losa S, Goudjil F, Magelssen H, Evensen ME, Saran F, Smyth G, Rombi B, Righetto R, Kortmann RD, Janssens GO. Dosimetric comparison of five different techniques for craniospinal irradiation across 15 European centers: analysis on behalf of the SIOP-E-BTG (radiotherapy working group) . Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1240-1249. [PMID: 29698060 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1465588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Conventional techniques (3D-CRT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI) are still widely used. Modern techniques (IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy®, proton pencil beam scanning [PBS]) are applied in a limited number of centers. For a 14-year-old patient, we aimed to compare dose distributions of five CSI techniques applied across Europe and generated according to the participating institute protocols, therefore representing daily practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS A multicenter (n = 15) dosimetric analysis of five different techniques for CSI (3D-CRT, IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy®, PBS; 3 centers per technique) was performed using the same patient data, set of delineations and dose prescription (36.0/1.8 Gy). Different treatment plans were optimized based on the same planning target volume margin. All participating institutes returned their best treatment plan applicable in clinic. RESULTS The modern radiotherapy techniques investigated resulted in superior conformity/homogeneity-indices (CI/HI), particularly in the spinal part of the target (CI: 3D-CRT:0.3 vs. modern:0.6; HI: 3D-CRT:0.2 vs. modern:0.1), and demonstrated a decreased dose to the thyroid, heart, esophagus and pancreas. Dose reductions of >10.0 Gy were observed with PBS compared to modern photon techniques for parotid glands, thyroid and pancreas. Following this technique, a wide range in dosimetry among centers using the same technique was observed (e.g., thyroid mean dose: VMAT: 5.6-24.6 Gy; PBS: 0.3-10.1 Gy). CONCLUSIONS The investigated modern radiotherapy techniques demonstrate superior dosimetric results compared to 3D-CRT. The lowest mean dose for organs at risk is obtained with proton therapy. However, for a large number of organs ranges in mean doses were wide and overlapping between techniques making it difficult to recommend one radiotherapy technique over another.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrica Seravalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Maxima Centre for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mirjam Bosman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Maxima Centre for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Yasmin Lassen-Ramshad
- Department of Oncology and Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anne Vestergaard
- Department of Oncology and Danish Center for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Foppe Oldenburger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jorrit Visser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Efi Koutsouveli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Gail Horan
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Thankamma Ajithkumar
- Department of Oncology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, West German Protontherapy Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Carolina-Sofia Fuentes
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, West German Protontherapy Center Essen, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Gillian Whitfield
- The University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK and The Children's Brain Tumour Research Network, University of Manchester, Royal Mancheste Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Laetitia Padovani
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Eloise Garnier
- Department of Radiotherapy, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Timone, Marseille, France
| | - Lorenza Gandola
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Meroni
- Pediatric Radiotherapy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Bianca A. W. Hoeben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Kusters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Claire Alapetite
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie and Centre de protontherapie, Paris and Orsay, France
| | - Sandra Losa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie and Centre de protontherapie, Paris and Orsay, France
| | - Farid Goudjil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie and Centre de protontherapie, Paris and Orsay, France
| | - Henriette Magelssen
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Morten Egeberg Evensen
- Department of Oncology, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Frank Saran
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton, UK
| | - Gregory Smyth
- Joint Department of Physics at The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Barbara Rombi
- Protontherapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari APSS, Trento, Italy
| | - Roberto Righetto
- Protontherapy Center, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari APSS, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Geert O. Janssens
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht and Princess Maxima Centre for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ahmed SK, Kruse JJ, Bradley TB, Beltran CJ, Laack NNI. Clinical efficacy and safety of a highly conformal, supine, hybrid forward and inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy technique for craniospinal irradiation. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:629-636. [PMID: 29129125 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2017.1400686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To demonstrate the clinical efficacy and safety of a highly conformal, supine, hybrid forward and inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique for photon craniospinal irradiation (CSI). METHODS Patients who received supine, hybrid IMRT CSI from 2009 to 2014 were included in this retrospective review. Clinical target volume (CTV) was defined as intracranial contents and thecal sac, including nerve roots. Dose was prescribed such that >99% of CTV received >99% of prescription and >95% of the planning target volume received >95% of prescription, with no attempt to include vertebral bodies. Lateral fields were utilized at the cranium and upper cervical spine. Spine fields were either single posterior or 2-3 obliques. Plans were generated with a hybrid of forward and inverse planned IMRT. Inferior borders of the cranium fields and superior border of the lower spine field were designed with 6-15 cm long, gradual dose gradients by sequential closing of multileaf collimator leaves using forward planned multiple static segment IMRT delivery. The sliding window upper spine IMRT field was created by the inverse planning system to match gradients of the brain and lower spine fields. The lower spine field gradient was similarly completed. RESULTS The cohort consisted of 34 patients. Median CSI dose was 36 Gy (range: 18-39.6 Gy). With a median follow up of 59.4 months, there were no isolated recurrences or spinal myelopathies at CTV margins or field gradients. Eleven patients had recurrence, all of which were intracranial. CONCLUSIONS Our hybrid forward and inverse planned IMRT supine CSI technique did not result in any isolated recurrences or myelopathies at CTV margins or field gradients. This suggests our target volumes and blended gradients are appropriate for highly conformal three-dimensional planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Safia K Ahmed
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Jon J Kruse
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Thomas B Bradley
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | - Chris J Beltran
- a Department of Radiation Oncology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Radiotherapy for Adult Medulloblastoma: Evaluation of Helical Tomotherapy, Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy, and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and the Results of Helical Tomotherapy Therapy. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2018; 2018:9153496. [PMID: 29750173 PMCID: PMC5884299 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9153496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Revised: 01/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Introduction All adult medulloblastoma (AMB) patients should be treated with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) postoperatively. Because of the long irradiation range, multiple radiation fields must be designed for conventional radiotherapy technology. CSI can be completed in only one session with helical tomotherapy (HT). We evaluated the dose of HT, volumetric intensity modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) of AMB and the results of 5 cases of AMB treated with HT. Methods Complete craniospinal and posterior cranial fossa irradiation with HT, VMAT, and 3D-CRT and dose evaluation were performed. And results of 5 cases of AMB treated with HT were evaluated. Results A large volume of tissue was exposed to low dose radiation in the organs at risk (OAR), while a small volume was exposed to high dose radiation with HT. The conformity and uniformity of the targets were good with HT and VMAT, and the volume of targets exposed to high dose with VMAT was larger than that of HT. The uniformity of 3D-CRT was also good, but the dose conformity was poor. The main toxicity was hematologic toxicity, without 4th-degree bone marrow suppression. There was 3rd-degree inhibition in the white blood cells, hemoglobin, and platelets. The three female patients suffered menstrual disorders during the course of radiation. Two female patients with heavy menstruation suffered 3rd-degree anemia inhibition, and 2 patients suffered amenorrhea after radiotherapy. Although menstrual cycle was normal, the third patient was not pregnant. Conclusion CSI with HT is convenient for clinical practice, and the side effects are mild. With good conformity and uniformity, VMAT can also be used for selection in CSI. For poor conformity, 3D-CRT should not be the priority selection for CSI. In female patients, the ovaries should be protected.
Collapse
|
10
|
Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy using different techniques, simultaneous integrated boost and sequential boost for craniospinal irradiation: a single institution experience. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2017. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396917000103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurposeCraniospinal irradiation (CSI) has become an important and challenging radiation technique for radiation oncologists. Helical tomotherapy (HT) seems to have dosimetric advantage for CSI compared with other radiation modalities. The purpose of this study was to compare dosimetric data between two different HT plans; simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and sequential boost (Sq).MethodTwelve previously treated CSI contoured datasets by SIB technique were replanned. Dosimetric comparative parameters of targets were conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI). For organ at risk (OARs), the mean dose of parallel organs, D2% of serial organs and whole body integral dose (ID) were also investigated.ResultSIB plan significantly provided more conformed dose to CSI and tumour boost while resulting in a similar CI in spinal boost region compared with Sq plan. The HI showed no differences between two plans. Radiation exposure to serial organs and ID were also significantly lower in SIB plan.ConclusionCSI treatment using HT, SIB technique was feasible and had more target coverage while minimising the radiation dose to healthy tissues.
Collapse
|
11
|
Marszałek A, Szylberg Ł, Wiśniewski S. Pathologic aspects of skull base tumors. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016; 21:288-303. [PMID: 27330415 PMCID: PMC4899430 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2015] [Revised: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 02/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Skull base tumors form a highly heterogeneous group. As there are several structures in this anatomical site, a large number of different primary malignancies might develop, as well as a variety of secondary (metastatic) tumors. In this article, the most common malignancies are presented, along with a short histopathologic description. For some entities, an immunohistochemical profile is also given that should be helpful in proper diagnosis. As many pathologic diagnoses nowadays also include genetic studies, the most common genetic abnormalities in skull base tumors are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Marszałek
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Greater Poland Center of Oncology, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Cancer Pathology and Prophylactics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
| | - Łukasz Szylberg
- Department of Clinical Pathomorphology, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Poland
| | - Sławomir Wiśniewski
- Department of Cancer Pathology, Greater Poland Center of Oncology, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Strojnik A, Méndez I, Peterlin P. Reducing the dosimetric impact of positional errors in field junctions for craniospinal irradiation using VMAT. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2016; 21:232-9. [PMID: 27601956 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2015] [Revised: 01/18/2016] [Accepted: 03/04/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM To improve treatment plan robustness with respect to small shifts in patient position during the VMAT treatment by ensuring a linear ramp-like dose profile in treatment field overlap regions. BACKGROUND Craniospinal irradiation (CSI) is considered technically challenging because the target size exceeds the maximal field size, which necessitates using abutted or overlapping treatment fields. Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) is increasingly being examined for CSI, as it offers both better dose homogeneity and better dose conformance while also offering a possibility to create field junctions which are more robust towards small shifts in patient position during the treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS A VMAT treatment plan with three isocenters was made for a test case patient. Three groups of overlapping arc field pairs were used; one for the cranial and two for the spinal part. In order to assure a ramp-like dose profile in the field overlap region, the upper spinal part was optimised first, with dose prescription explicitly enforcing a ramp-like dose profile. The cranial and lower spinal part were done afterwards, taking into account the dose contribution of the upper spinal fields. RESULTS Using simple geometrical reasoning, we demonstrated that hot- and cold spots which arise from small displacement of one treatment field relative to the other treatment field can be reduced by taking two precautions: (a) widening the field overlap region, and (b) reducing the field gradient across the overlap region. The function with the smallest maximal gradient is a linear ramp. We present a treatment planning technique which yields the desired dose profile of the two contributing fields, and minimises dosimetric dependence on minor positional errors in patient set-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrej Strojnik
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Ignasi Méndez
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primož Peterlin
- Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Zaloška 2, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Skórska M, Piotrowski T, Ryczkowski A, Kaźmierska J. Comparison of treatment planning parameters for dose painting head and neck plans delivered with tomotherapy. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20150970. [PMID: 26828971 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine which physical delivery parameter changes are most suitable for multiple-level dose-painting treatment plans with helical tomotherapy (HT). METHODS A total of 96 treatment plans were generated for 12 patients who had undergone fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT ((18)F-FDG-PET/CT) scan to plan head and neck cancer treatment. Based on these PET-CT images, the dose was escalated to 96 Gy in 32 fractions as a function of PET intensity values. The intensity-based prescription was converted into seven discrete dose levels. For the same patient, different HT plans were optimized by varying parameters such as field width (FW), pitch (PF) and modulation factor (MF). Dose conformity was evaluated using quality-volume histograms, quality factors (QFs), weighted index of achievement (IOAw), coldness (IOCw) and hotness (IOHw). Moreover, doses to organs at risk (OARs), target volumes and execution time were analyzed. RESULTS Median QFs were the best for FW = 1.05 cm (QF = 2.10) and the worst for FW = 2.5 cm (QF = 3.04). The same trend was observed for IOAw, IOCw and IOHw. Combination of FW = 1.05 cm and MF = 5 leads to the longest beam-on time (above 25 min), whereas FW = 2.5 cm and MF = 3 lead to the shortest time (below 8 min). Data analyzed based on dose-volume histogram showed that changes in FW had the strongest impact on plan quality, whereas the effect of MF and PF changes was moderate. CONCLUSION HT is suitable for multiple-level dose-painting treatment plans. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Changes in FW and MF had the greatest impact on dose distribution quality and beam-on time. Changes in PF only influenced doses to the OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malgorzata Skórska
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Tomasz Piotrowski
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland.,2 Department of Electroradiology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Adam Ryczkowski
- 1 Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | - Joanna Kaźmierska
- 2 Department of Electroradiology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.,3 Department of Radiotherapy II, Greater Poland Cancer Centre in Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|