Molecular switches in GPCRs

Unveiling G-Protein-Coupled Receptor Conformational Dynamics via Metadynamics Simulations and Markov State Models

The dynamic character of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is essential in their functionality as signal transducers. However, the molecular details of how ligands affect this conformational repertoire to steer intracellular signaling pathways remain elusive. To address this question, we present a generally applicable protocol that combines metadynamics simulations and Markov state modeling to compute the free energy landscape of the growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR-1a), a prototypical class A GPCR, in its apo state and bound to pharmacologically distinct ligands. Consistent with the current multistate model of GPCR activity, we found that GHSR-1a populates multiple metastable states whose energies and transition probabilities change depending on the bound ligand. We identified intermediate states that have not yet been described by experimental structures and shed light on the molecular differences between basal and agonist-induced GHSR-1a activation. Our results are not only compatible with previously reported experimental data, but they capture the equilibria governing GHSR-1a activation in unprecedented detail. Due to its applicability to all class A GPCRs, our protocol is a valuable tool for the development of pharmaceuticals targeting this protein family.

Ghrelin-LEAP2 interactions along the stomach-liver axis

Ghrelin produced in the stomach promotes food intake and GH secretion, and acts as an anabolic peptide during starvation. Ghrelin binds to the growth hormone secretagogue receptor, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), whose high-resolution complex structures have been determined in the apo state and when bound to an antagonist. Anamorelin, a low-molecular-weight ghrelin agonist, has been launched in Japan for the treatment of cancer cachexia, and its therapeutic potential has attracted attention due to the various biological activities of ghrelin. In 2019, liver-expressed antimicrobial peptide (LEAP2), initially discovered as an antimicrobial peptide produced in the liver, was identified to be upregulated in the stomach of diet-induced obese mice after vertical sleeve gastrectomy. LEAP2 binds to the GHSR and antagonizes ghrelin's activities. The serum concentrations of human LEAP2 are positively correlated with body mass index, body fat accumulation, and fasting serum concentrations of glucose and triglyceride. Serum LEAP2 elevated and ghrelin reduced in obesity. Ghrelin and LEAP2 regulate body weight, food intake, and GH and blood glucose concentrations, and other physiological phenomena through their interactions with the same receptor, GHSR.

Molecular basis underlying the specificity of an antagonist AA92593 for mammalian melanopsins

Melanopsin functions in intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells of mammals to regulate circadian clock and pupil constriction. The opsinamide AA92593 has been reported to specifically inhibit mouse and human melanopsin functions as a competitive antagonist against retinal; however, the molecular mechanisms underlying its specificity have not been resolved. In this study, we attempted to identify amino acid residues responsible for the susceptibility of mammalian melanopsins to AA92593. Our cell-based assays confirmed that AA92593 effectively inhibited the light-induced cellular responses of mammalian melanopsins, but not those of non-mammalian vertebrate and invertebrate melanopsins. These results suggest that amino acid residues specifically conserved among mammalian melanopsins are important for the antagonistic effect of AA92593, and we noticed Phe-942.61, Ser-188ECL2, and Ser-2696.52 as candidate residues. Substitutions of these residues reduced the antagonistic effect of AA92593. We conducted docking and molecular dynamics simulations based on the AlphaFold-predicted melanopsin structure. The simulations indicated that Phe-942.61, Ser-188ECL2, and Ser-2696.52 are located at the AA92593-binding site and additionally identified Trp-189ECL2 and Leu-2075.42 interacting with the antagonist. Substitutions of Trp-189ECL2 and Leu-2075.42 affected the antagonistic effect of AA92593. Furthermore, substitutions of these amino acid residues converted the AA92593-insensitive non-mammalian melanopsins susceptible to the antagonist. Based on experiments and molecular simulations, five amino acid residues, at positions 942.61, 188ECL2, 189ECL2, 2075.42, and 2696.52, were found to be responsible for the specific susceptibility of mammalian melanopsins to AA92593.

Exploring the constitutive activation mechanism of the class A orphan GPR20

GPR20, an orphan G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), shows significant expression in intestinal tissue and represents a potential therapeutic target to treat gastrointestinal stromal tumors. GPR20 performs high constitutive activity when coupling with Gi. Despite the pharmacological importance of GPCR constitutive activation, determining the mechanism has long remained unclear. In this study, we explored the constitutive activation mechanism of GPR20 through large-scale unbiased molecular dynamics simulations. Our results unveil the allosteric nature of constitutively activated GPCR signal transduction involving extracellular and intracellular domains. Moreover, the constitutively active state of the GPR20 requires both the N-terminal cap and Gi protein. The N-terminal cap of GPR20 functions like an agonist and mediates long-range activated conformational shift. Together with the previous study, this study enhances our knowledge of the self-activation mechanism of the orphan receptor, facilitates the drug discovery efforts that target GPR20.

Structural insights into CXCR4 modulation and oligomerization

Activation of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 by its chemokine ligand CXCL12 regulates diverse cellular processes. Previously reported crystal structures of CXCR4 revealed the architecture of an inactive, homodimeric receptor. However, many structural aspects of CXCR4 remain poorly understood. Here, we use cryo-electron microscopy to investigate various modes of human CXCR4 regulation. CXCL12 activates CXCR4 by inserting its N terminus deep into the CXCR4 orthosteric pocket. The binding of US Food and Drug Administration-approved antagonist AMD3100 is stabilized by electrostatic interactions with acidic residues in the seven-transmembrane-helix bundle. A potent antibody blocker, REGN7663, binds across the extracellular face of CXCR4 and inserts its complementarity-determining region H3 loop into the orthosteric pocket. Trimeric and tetrameric structures of CXCR4 reveal modes of G-protein-coupled receptor oligomerization. We show that CXCR4 adopts distinct subunit conformations in trimeric and tetrameric assemblies, highlighting how oligomerization could allosterically regulate chemokine receptor function.

Charge Movements and Conformational Changes: Biophysical Properties and Physiology of Voltage-Dependent GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate multiple cellular functions and represent important drug targets. More than 20 years ago, it was noted that GPCR activation (agonist binding) and signaling (G protein activation) are dependent on the membrane potential (VM). While it is now proven that many GPCRs display an intrinsic voltage dependence, the molecular mechanisms of how GPCRs sense depolarization of the plasma membrane are less well defined. This review summarizes the current knowledge of voltage-dependent signaling in GPCRs. We describe how voltage dependence was discovered in muscarinic receptors, present an overview of GPCRs that are regulated by voltage, and show how biophysical properties of GPCRs led to the discovery of voltage-sensing mechanisms in those receptors. Furthermore, we summarize physiological functions that have been shown to be regulated by voltage-dependent GPCR signaling of endogenous receptors in excitable tissues, such as the nervous system or the heart. Finally, we discuss challenges that remain in analyzing voltage-dependent signaling of GPCRs in vivo and present an outlook on experimental applications of the interesting concept of GPCR signaling.

Potent and Selective Human 5-HT2B Serotonin Receptor Antagonists: 4'-Cyano-(N)-methanocarba-adenosines by Synthetic Serendipity

Rigidified nucleoside derivatives with (N)-methanocarba replacement of ribose have been repurposed as peripheral subtype-selective 5-HT2B serotonin receptor antagonists for heart and lung fibrosis and intestinal/vascular conditions. 4'-Cyano derivative 40 (MRS8209; Ki, 4.27 nM) was 47-fold (human binding, but not rat and mouse) and 724-fold (functionally) selective at 5-HT2BR, compared to antitarget 5-HT2CR, and predicted to form a stable receptor complex using docking and molecular dynamics. 4'-Cyano substituents enhanced 5-HT2BR affinity (typically 4-5-fold compared to 4'-CH2OH), depending on an N6 group larger than methyl. Asymmetric N6 groups (4'-cyano-2-halo derivatives 33-35 and 37) provided potent 5-HT2BR Ki values (7-22 nM). A 4'-CH2CN substituent was less effective than 4'-CN at increasing 5-HT2BR affinity, while a 4'-CHF2 group produced high 5-HT2B affinity/selectivity. A 2-benzylthio-adenine group with unsubstituted 6-NH2 shifted the typical selectivity pattern toward potent 5-HT2C binding. Thus, the SAR suggests that N6-cyclopentyl-4'-cyano modifications are promising, with an interdependence among the substituent positions.

Divergent roles of DRY and NPxxY motifs in selective activation of downstream signalling by the apelin receptor

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) serve as critical communication hubs, translating a wide range of extracellular signals into intracellular responses that govern numerous physiological processes. In class-A GPCRs, conserved motifs mediate conformational changes of the active states of the receptor, and signal transduction is achieved by selectively binding to Gα proteins and/or adapter protein, arrestin. Apelin receptor (APJR) is a class-A GPCR that regulates a wide range of intracellular signalling cascades in response to apelin and elabela peptide ligands. Understanding how conserved motifs within APJR mediate activation and signal specificity remains unexplored. This study focuses on the functional roles of the DRY and NPxxY motifs within APJR by analyzing their impact on downstream signaling pathways across the receptor's conformational ensembles. Our findings provide compelling evidence that mutations within the conserved DRY and NPxxY motifs of APJR significantly alter its conformational preferences where modification of DRY motif leads to abrogation of G-protein coupling and mutation of NPxxY motif causing abolition of β-arrestin-2 recruitment. These observations shed light on the importance of these motifs in APJR activation and its potential for functional selectivity, highlighting the role of DRY/NPxxY as conformational switches of APJR signalling.

State transitions of coupled Gi-protein: Insights into internal water channel dynamics within dopamine receptor D3 from in silico submolecular analyses

Dopamine is a crucial neurotransmitter in the central nervous system (CNS) that facilitates communication among neurons. Activation of dopamine receptors in the CNS regulates key functions such as movement, cognition, and emotion. Disruption of these receptors can result in severe neurological diseases. Although recent research has elucidated the structure of D3R in complex with Gi-protein, revealing the binding and activation mechanisms, the precise conformational changes induced by G-protein activation and GDP/GTP exchange remain unclear. In this study, atomic-level long-term molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were employed to investigate the dynamics of D3R in complex with different states of Gi-protein and β-arrestin. Our simulations revealed distinct molecular switches within D3R and fluctuations in the distance between Ras and helical domains of G-protein across different G-protein-D3R states. Notably, the D3R-GTP-Gi state exhibited increased activity compared with the D3R-empty-Gi state. Additionally, analyses of potential of mean force (PMF) and free energy landscapes for various systems revealed the formation of a continuous water channel exclusively in the D3R-Gi-GTP state. Furthermore, allosteric communication pathways were proposed for active D3R bound to Gi-protein. This study offers insights into the activation mechanism when Gi-protein interacts with active D3R, potentially aiding in developing selective drugs targeting the dopaminergic system.

Mechanistic insights into G-protein coupling with an agonist-bound G-protein-coupled receptor

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) activate heterotrimeric G proteins by promoting guanine nucleotide exchange. Here, we investigate the coupling of G proteins with GPCRs and describe the events that ultimately lead to the ejection of GDP from its binding pocket in the Gα subunit, the rate-limiting step during G-protein activation. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we investigate the temporal progression of structural rearrangements of GDP-bound Gs protein (Gs·GDP; hereafter GsGDP) upon coupling to the β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) in atomic detail. The binding of GsGDP to the β2AR is followed by long-range allosteric effects that significantly reduce the energy needed for GDP release: the opening of α1-αF helices, the displacement of the αG helix and the opening of the α-helical domain. Signal propagation to the Gs occurs through an extended receptor interface, including a lysine-rich motif at the intracellular end of a kinked transmembrane helix 6, which was confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis and functional assays. From this β2AR-GsGDP intermediate, Gs undergoes an in-plane rotation along the receptor axis to approach the β2AR-Gsempty state. The simulations shed light on how the structural elements at the receptor-G-protein interface may interact to transmit the signal over 30 Å to the nucleotide-binding site. Our analysis extends the current limited view of nucleotide-free snapshots to include additional states and structural features responsible for signaling and G-protein coupling specificity.

Molecular determinants of neuropeptide-mediated activation mechanisms in tachykinin NK1 and NK2 receptors

Substance P and neurokinin A are closely related neuropeptides belonging to the tachykinin family. Their receptors are neurokinin one receptor (NK1R) and neurokinin two receptor (NK2R), G protein-coupled receptors that transmit Gs and Gq-mediated downstream signaling. We investigate the importance of sequence differences at the bottom of the receptor orthosteric site for activity and selectivity, focusing on residues that closely interact with the C-terminal methionine of the peptide ligands. We identify a conserved serine (NK1R-S2977.45) and the position of the tryptophan residue within the canonical "toggle switch" motif, CWxP of TM6, neighboring a phenylalanine in NK1R (NK1R-F2646.51) and a tyrosine in NK2R (NK2R-Y2666.51), giving rise to distinct microenvironments for the neuropeptide C terminals. Mutating these residues results in dramatic activity changes in both NK1R and NK2R due to a close interaction between the ligand and toggle switch. Structural analysis of active and inactive NKR structures suggests only a minor change in sidechain rotation of toggle switch residues upon activation. However, extensive molecular dynamics simulations of receptor:neuropeptide:G protein complexes indicate that a major, concerted motion happens in the toggle switch tryptophan indole group and the sidechains of the microswitch motif Pro-Ile-Phe (PIF). This rotation establishes a tight hydrogen bond interaction from the tryptophan indole to the conserved serine (NK1R-S2977.45) and a mainchain carbonyl (NK1R-A2947.41) in the kink of TM7. This interaction facilitates communication with the NPxxY microswitch motif of TM7, resulting in stabilization of the G protein-binding region. NK1R-S2977.45 is consequently identified as a central hub for the activation of NKRs.

Molecular Dynamics (MD) Simulations Provide Insights into the Activation Mechanisms of 5-HT2A Receptors

Recent breakthroughs in the determination of atomic resolution 3-D cryo-electron microscopy structures of membrane proteins present an unprecedented opportunity for drug discovery. Structure-based drug discovery utilizing in silico methods enables the study of dynamic connectivity of stable conformations induced by the drug in achieving its effect. With the ever-expanding computational power, simulations of this type reveal protein dynamics in the nano-, micro-, and even millisecond time scales. In the present study, aiming to characterize the protein dynamics of the 5HT2A receptor stimulated by ligands (agonist/antagonist), we performed 1 µs MD simulations on 5HT2A/DOI (agonist), 5HT2A/GSK215083 (antagonist), and 5HT2A (APO, no ligand) systems. The crystal structure of 5HT2A/zotepine (antagonist) (PDB: 6A94) was used to set up the simulation systems in a lipid bilayer environment. We found the monitoring of the ionic lock residue pair (R3.50-E6.30) of 5HT2A in MD simulations to be a good approximation of the effects of agonists (ionic lock breakage) or antagonists (ionic lock formation) on receptor activation. We further performed analyses of the MD trajectories, including Principal Component Analysis (PCA), hydrogen bond, salt bridge, and hydrophobic interaction network analyses, and correlation between residues to identify key elements of receptor activation. Our results suggest that in order to trigger receptor activation, DOI must interact with 5HT2A through residues V5.39, G5.42, S5.43, and S5.46 on TM5, inducing significant conformational changes in the backbone angles of G5.42 and S5.43. DOI also interacted with residues W6.48 (toggle switch) and F6.51 on TM6, causing major conformational shifts in the backbone angles of F6.44 and V6.45. These structural changes were transmitted to the intracellular ends of TM5, TM6, and ICL3, resulting in the breaking of the ionic lock and subsequent G protein activation. The studies could be helpful in future design of selective agonists/antagonists for various serotonin receptors (5HT1A, 5HT2A, 5HT2B, 5HT2C, and 5HT7) involved in detrimental disorders, such as addiction and schizophrenia.

Effects of an external static EF on the conformational transition of 5-HT1A receptor: A molecular dynamics simulation study

The serotonin receptor subtype 1A (5-HT1AR), one of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family, has been implicated in several neurological conditions. Understanding the activation and inactivation mechanism of 5-HT1AR at the molecular level is critical for discovering novel therapeutics in many diseases. Recently there has been a growing appreciation for the role of external electric fields (EFs) in influencing the structure and activity of biomolecules. In this study, we used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to examine conformational features of active states of 5-HT1AR and investigate the effect of an external static EF with 0.02 V/nm applied on the active state of 5-HT1AR. Our results showed that the active state of 5-HT1AR maintained the native structure, while the EF led to structural modifications in 5-HT1AR, particularly inducing the inward movement of transmembrane helix 6 (TM6). Furthermore, it disturbed the conformational switches associated with activation in the CWxP, DRY, PIF, and NPxxY motifs, consequently predisposing an inclination towards the inactive-like conformation. We also found that the EF led to an overall increase in the dipole moment of 5-HT1AR, encompassing TM6 and pivotal amino acids. The analyses of conformational properties of TM6 showed that the changed secondary structure and decreased solvent exposure occurred upon the EF condition. The interaction of 5-HT1AR with the membrane lipid bilayer was also altered under the EF. Our findings reveal the molecular mechanism underlying the transition of 5-HT1AR conformation induced by external EFs, which offer potential novel insights into the prospect of employing structure-based EF applications for GPCRs.

Structural basis of frizzled 7 activation and allosteric regulation

Frizzleds (ten paralogs: FZD1-10) belong to the class F of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which remains poorly understood despite its crucial role in multiple key biological functions including embryonic development, stem cell regulation, and homeostasis in the adult. FZD7, one of the most studied members of the family, is more specifically involved in the migration of mesendoderm cells during the development and renewal of intestinal stem cells in adults. Moreover, FZD7 has been highlighted for its involvement in tumor development predominantly in the gastrointestinal tract. This study reports the structure of inactive FZD7, without any stabilizing mutations, determined by cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) at 1.9 Å resolution. We characterize a fluctuating water pocket in the core of the receptor important for FZD7 dynamics. Molecular dynamics simulations are used to investigate the temporal distribution of those water molecules and their importance for potential conformational changes in FZD7. Moreover, we identify lipids interacting with the receptor core and a conserved cholesterol-binding site, which displays a key role in FZD7 association with a transducer protein, Disheveled (DVL), and initiation of downstream signaling and signalosome formation.

A neurodevelopmental disorder mutation locks G proteins in the transitory pre-activated state

Many neurotransmitter receptors activate G proteins through exchange of GDP for GTP. The intermediate nucleotide-free state has eluded characterization, due largely to its inherent instability. Here we characterize a G protein variant associated with a rare neurological disorder in humans. GαoK46E has a charge reversal that clashes with the phosphate groups of GDP and GTP. As anticipated, the purified protein binds poorly to guanine nucleotides yet retains wild-type affinity for G protein βγ subunits. In cells with physiological concentrations of nucleotide, GαoK46E forms a stable complex with receptors and Gβγ, impeding effector activation. Further, we demonstrate that the mutant can be easily purified in complex with dopamine-bound D2 receptors, and use cryo-electron microscopy to determine the structure, including both domains of Gαo, without nucleotide or stabilizing nanobodies. These findings reveal the molecular basis for the first committed step of G protein activation, establish a mechanistic basis for a neurological disorder, provide a simplified strategy to determine receptor-G protein structures, and a method to detect high affinity agonist binding in cells.

Illuminating the neuropeptide Y4 receptor and its ligand pancreatic polypeptide from a structural, functional, and therapeutic perspective

The neuropeptide Y4 receptor (Y4R), a rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) and the hormone pancreatic polypeptide (PP) are members of the neuropeptide Y family consisting of four receptors (Y1R, Y2R, Y4R, Y5R) and three highly homologous peptide ligands (neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, PP). In this family, the Y4R is of particular interest as it is the only subtype with high affinity to PP over NPY. The Y4R, as a mediator of PP signaling, has a pivotal role in appetite regulation and energy homeostasis, offering potential avenues for the treatment of metabolic disorders such as obesity. PP as anorexigenic peptide is released postprandial from the pancreas in response to food intake, induces satiety signals and contributes to hamper excessive food intake. Moreover, this system was also described to be associated with different types of cancer: overexpression of Y4R have been found in human adenocarcinoma cells, while elevated levels of PP are related to the development of pancreatic endocrine tumors. The pharmacological relevance of the Y4R advanced the search for potent and selective ligands for this receptor subtype, which will be significantly progressed through the elucidation of the active state PP-Y4R cryo-EM structure. This review summarizes the development of novel PP-derived ligands, like Obinepitide as dual Y2R/Y4R agonist in clinical trials or UR-AK86c as small hexapeptide agonist with picomolar affinity, as well as the first allosteric modulators that selectively target the Y4R, e.g. VU0506013 as potent Y4R positive allosteric modulator or (S)-VU0637120 as allosteric antagonist. Here, we provide valuable insights into the complex physiological functions of the Y4R and PP and the pharmacological relevance of the system in appetite regulation to open up new avenues for the development of tool compounds for targeted therapies with potential applications in metabolic disorders.

Flipping the GPCR Switch: Structure-Based Development of Selective Cannabinoid Receptor 2 Inverse Agonists

We report a blueprint for the rational design of G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) ligands with a tailored functional response. The present study discloses the structure-based design of cannabinoid receptor type 2 (CB2R) selective inverse agonists (S)-1 and (R)-1, which were derived from privileged agonist HU-308 by introduction of a phenyl group at the gem-dimethylheptyl side chain. Epimer (R)-1 exhibits high affinity for CB2R with Kd = 39.1 nM and serves as a platform for the synthesis of a wide variety of probes. Notably, for the first time these fluorescent probes retain their inverse agonist functionality, high affinity, and selectivity for CB2R independent of linker and fluorophore substitution. Ligands (S)-1, (R)-1, and their derivatives act as inverse agonists in CB2R-mediated cAMP as well as G protein recruitment assays and do not trigger β-arrestin-receptor association. Furthermore, no receptor activation was detected in live cell ERK1/2 phosphorylation and Ca2+-release assays. Confocal fluorescence imaging experiments with (R)-7 (Alexa488) and (R)-9 (Alexa647) probes employing BV-2 microglial cells visualized CB2R expressed at endogenous levels. Finally, molecular dynamics simulations corroborate the initial docking data in which inverse agonists restrict movement of toggle switch Trp2586.48 and thereby stabilize CB2R in its inactive state.

Frizzleds act as dynamic pharmacological entities

The Frizzled family of transmembrane receptors (FZD1-10) belongs to the class F of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). FZDs bind to and are activated by Wingless/Int1 (WNT) proteins. The WNT/FZD signaling system regulates crucial aspects of developmental biology and stem-cell regulation. Dysregulation of WNT/FZD communication can lead to developmental defects and diseases such as cancer and fibrosis. Recent insight into the activation mechanisms of FZDs has underlined that protein dynamics and conserved microswitches are essential for FZD-mediated information flow and build the basis for targeting these receptors pharmacologically. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of FZD activation, and how novel concepts merge and collide with existing dogmas in the field.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): advances in structures, mechanisms, and drug discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), the largest family of human membrane proteins and an important class of drug targets, play a role in maintaining numerous physiological processes. Agonist or antagonist, orthosteric effects or allosteric effects, and biased signaling or balanced signaling, characterize the complexity of GPCR dynamic features. In this study, we first review the structural advancements, activation mechanisms, and functional diversity of GPCRs. We then focus on GPCR drug discovery by revealing the detailed drug-target interactions and the underlying mechanisms of orthosteric drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in the past five years. Particularly, an up-to-date analysis is performed on available GPCR structures complexed with synthetic small-molecule allosteric modulators to elucidate key receptor-ligand interactions and allosteric mechanisms. Finally, we highlight how the widespread GPCR-druggable allosteric sites can guide structure- or mechanism-based drug design and propose prospects of designing bitopic ligands for the future therapeutic potential of targeting this receptor family.

Ferns G, Batra J, Lam AKY, Giovannetti E, Avan A. G-Protein Signaling Modulator 2 as a Potential Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer: Integrative Analysis Using Genetic Profiling and Pan-Cancer Studies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) imposes a significant healthcare burden globally, prompting the quest for innovative biomarkers to enhance diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. This study investigates the G-protein signaling modulator (GPSM) family across several cancers and presents a comprehensive pan-cancer analysis of the GPSM2 gene across several gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Leveraging bioinformatics methodologies, we investigated GPSM2 expression patterns, protein interactions, functional enrichments, prognostic implications, genetic alterations, and immune infiltration associations. Furthermore, the expression of the GPSM2 gene was analyzed using real-time analysis. Our findings reveal a consistent upregulation of GPSM2 expression in all GI cancer datasets analyzed, suggesting its potential as a universal biomarker in GI cancers. Functional enrichment analysis underscores the involvement of GPSM2 in vital pathways, indicating its role in tumor progression. The prognostic assessment indicates that elevated GPSM2 expression correlates with adverse overall and disease-free survival outcomes across multiple GI cancer types. Genetic alteration analysis highlights the prevalence of mutations, particularly missense mutations, in GPSM2. Furthermore, significant correlations between GPSM2 expression and immune cell infiltration are observed, suggesting its involvement in tumor immune evasion mechanisms. Collectively, our study underscores the multifaceted role of GPSM2 in GI cancers, particularly in CRC, emphasizing its potential as a promising biomarker for prognosis and therapeutic targeting. Further functional investigations are warranted to elucidate its clinical utility and therapeutic implications in CRC management.

Structural basis for the ligand recognition and signaling of free fatty acid receptors

Free fatty acid receptors 1 to 4 (FFA1 to FFA4) are class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). FFA1 to FFA3 share substantial sequence similarity, whereas FFA4 is unrelated. However, FFA1 and FFA4 are activated by long-chain fatty acids, while FFA2 and FFA3 respond to short-chain fatty acids generated by intestinal microbiota. FFA1, FFA2, and FFA4 are potential drug targets for metabolic and inflammatory conditions. Here, we determined the active structures of FFA1 and FFA4 bound to docosahexaenoic acid, FFA4 bound to the synthetic agonist TUG-891, and butyrate-bound FFA2, each complexed with an engineered heterotrimeric Gq protein (miniGq), by cryo-electron microscopy. Together with computational simulations and mutagenesis studies, we elucidated the similarities and differences in the binding modes of fatty acid ligands to their respective GPCRs. Our findings unveiled distinct mechanisms of receptor activation and G protein coupling. We anticipate that these outcomes will facilitate structure-based drug development and underpin future research on this group of GPCRs.

Structural basis for ligand recognition and signaling of hydroxy-carboxylic acid receptor 2

Hydroxycarboxylic acid receptors (HCAR1, HCAR2, and HCAR3) transduce Gi/o signaling upon biding to molecules such as lactic acid, butyric acid and 3-hydroxyoctanoic acid, which are associated with lipolytic and atherogenic activity, and neuroinflammation. Although many reports have elucidated the function of HCAR2 and its potential as a therapeutic target for treating not only dyslipidemia but also neuroimmune disorders such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson's disease, the structural basis of ligand recognition and ligand-induced Gi-coupling remains unclear. Here we report three cryo-EM structures of the human HCAR2-Gi signaling complex, each bound with different ligands: niacin, acipimox or GSK256073. All three agonists are held in a deep pocket lined by residues that are not conserved in HCAR1 and HCAR3. A distinct hairpin loop at the HCAR2 N-terminus and extra-cellular loop 2 (ECL2) completely enclose the ligand. These structures also reveal the agonist-induced conformational changes propagated to the G-protein-coupling interface during activation. Collectively, the structures presented here are expected to help in the design of ligands specific for HCAR2, leading to new drugs for the treatment of various diseases such as dyslipidemia and inflammation.

Structural insights into the agonists binding and receptor selectivity of human histamine H4 receptor

Histamine is a biogenic amine that participates in allergic and inflammatory processes by stimulating histamine receptors. The histamine H4 receptor (H4R) is a potential therapeutic target for chronic inflammatory diseases such as asthma and atopic dermatitis. Here, we show the cryo-electron microscopy structures of the H4R-Gq complex bound with an endogenous agonist histamine or the selective agonist imetit bound in the orthosteric binding pocket. The structures demonstrate binding mode of histamine agonists and that the subtype-selective agonist binding causes conformational changes in Phe3447.39, which, in turn, form the "aromatic slot". The results provide insights into the molecular underpinnings of the agonism of H4R and subtype selectivity of histamine receptors, and show that the H4R structures may be valuable in rational drug design of drugs targeting the H4R.

Keras/TensorFlow in Drug Design for Immunity Disorders

Homeostasis of the host immune system is regulated by white blood cells with a variety of cell surface receptors for cytokines. Chemotactic cytokines (chemokines) activate their receptors to evoke the chemotaxis of immune cells in homeostatic migrations or inflammatory conditions towards inflamed tissue or pathogens. Dysregulation of the immune system leading to disorders such as allergies, autoimmune diseases, or cancer requires efficient, fast-acting drugs to minimize the long-term effects of chronic inflammation. Here, we performed structure-based virtual screening (SBVS) assisted by the Keras/TensorFlow neural network (NN) to find novel compound scaffolds acting on three chemokine receptors: CCR2, CCR3, and one CXC receptor, CXCR3. Keras/TensorFlow NN was used here not as a typically used binary classifier but as an efficient multi-class classifier that can discard not only inactive compounds but also low- or medium-activity compounds. Several compounds proposed by SBVS and NN were tested in 100 ns all-atom molecular dynamics simulations to confirm their binding affinity. To improve the basic binding affinity of the compounds, new chemical modifications were proposed. The modified compounds were compared with known antagonists of these three chemokine receptors. Known CXCR3 compounds were among the top predicted compounds; thus, the benefits of using Keras/TensorFlow in drug discovery have been shown in addition to structure-based approaches. Furthermore, we showed that Keras/TensorFlow NN can accurately predict the receptor subtype selectivity of compounds, for which SBVS often fails. We cross-tested chemokine receptor datasets retrieved from ChEMBL and curated datasets for cannabinoid receptors. The NN model trained on the cannabinoid receptor datasets retrieved from ChEMBL was the most accurate in the receptor subtype selectivity prediction. Among NN models trained on the chemokine receptor datasets, the CXCR3 model showed the highest accuracy in differentiating the receptor subtype for a given compound dataset.

Structural diversity of leukotriene G-protein coupled receptors

Dihydroxy acid leukotriene (LTB4) and cysteinyl leukotrienes (LTC4, LTD4, and LTE4) are inflammatory mediators derived from arachidonic acid via the 5-lipoxygenase pathway. While structurally similar, these two types of leukotrienes (LTs) exert their functions through interactions with two distinct G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) families, BLT and CysLT receptors, which share low sequence similarity and belong to phylogenetically divergent GPCR groups. Selective antagonism of LT receptors has been proposed as a promising strategy for the treatment of many inflammation-related diseases including asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, rheumatoid arthritis, cystic fibrosis, diabetes, and several types of cancer. Selective CysLT1R antagonists are currently used as antiasthmatic drugs, however, there are no approved drugs targeting CysLT2 and BLT receptors. In this review, we highlight recently published structures of BLT1R and CysLTRs revealing unique structural features of the two receptor families. X-ray and cryo-EM data shed light on their overall conformations, differences in functional motifs involved in receptor activation, and details of the ligand-binding pockets. An unexpected binding mode of the selective antagonist BIIL260 in the BLT1R structure makes it the first example of a compound targeting the sodium-binding site of GPCRs and suggests a novel strategy for the receptor activity modulation. Taken together, these recent structural data reveal dramatic differences in the molecular architecture of the two LT receptor families and pave the way to new therapeutic strategies of selective targeting individual receptors with novel tool compounds obtained by the structure-based drug design approach.

Dynamic Insights into the Self-Activation Pathway and Allosteric Regulation of the Orphan G-Protein-Coupled Receptor GPR52

Within over 800 members of G-protein-coupled receptors, there are numerous orphan receptors whose endogenous ligands are largely unknown, providing many opportunities for novel drug discovery. However, the lack of an in-depth understanding of the intrinsic working mechanism for orphan receptors severely limits the related rational drug design. The G-protein-coupled receptor 52 (GPR52) is a unique orphan receptor that constitutively increases cellular 5'-cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels without binding any exogenous agonists and has been identified as a promising therapeutic target for central nervous system disorders. Although recent structural biology studies have provided snapshots of both active and inactive states of GPR52, the mechanism of the conformational transition between these states remains unclear. Here, an acceptable self-activation pathway for GPR52 was proposed through 6 μs Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics (GaMD) simulations, in which the receptor spontaneously transitions from the active state to that matching the inactive crystal structure. According to the three intermediate states of the receptor obtained by constructing a reweighted potential of mean force, how the allosteric regulation occurs between the extracellular orthosteric binding pocket and the intracellular G-protein-binding site is revealed. Combined with the independent gradient model, several important microswitch residues and the allosteric communication pathway that directly links the two regions are both identified. Transfer entropy calculations not only reveal the complex allosteric signaling within GPR52 but also confirm the unique role of ECL2 in allosteric regulation, which is mutually validated with the results of GaMD simulations. Overall, this work elucidates the allosteric mechanism of GPR52 at the atomic level, providing the most detailed information to date on the self-activation of the orphan receptor.

Pro-phagocytic function and structural basis of GPR84 signaling

GPR84 is a unique orphan G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that can be activated by endogenous medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs). The signaling of GPR84 is largely pro-inflammatory, which can augment inflammatory response, and GPR84 also functions as a pro-phagocytic receptor to enhance phagocytic activities of macrophages. In this study, we show that the activation of GPR84 by the synthetic agonist 6-OAU can synergize with the blockade of CD47 on cancer cells to induce phagocytosis of cancer cells by macrophages. We also determine a high-resolution structure of the GPR84-Gi signaling complex with 6-OAU. This structure reveals an occluded binding pocket for 6-OAU, the molecular basis of receptor activation involving non-conserved structural motifs of GPR84, and an unusual Gi-coupling interface. Together with computational docking and simulations studies, this structure also suggests a mechanism for the high selectivity of GPR84 for MCFAs and a potential routes of ligand binding and dissociation. These results provide a framework for understanding GPR84 signaling and developing new drugs targeting GPR84.

Structural and functional insights into the G protein-coupled receptors: CB1 and CB2

The cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 mediate a variety of physiological processes and continue to be explored as desirable drug targets. Both receptors are activated by the endogenous endocannabinoids and the psychoactive components of marijuana. Over the years, many efforts have been made to make selective ligands; however, the high degree of homology between cannabinoid receptor subtypes introduces challenges in studying either receptor in isolation. Recent advancements in structure biology have resulted in a surge of high-resolution structures, enriching our knowledge and understanding of receptor structure and function. In this review, of recent cannabinoid receptor structures, key features of the inactive and active state CB1 and CB2 are presented. These structures will provide additional insight into the modulation and signaling mechanism of cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2 and aid in the development of future therapeutics.

Structural basis for the ligand recognition and signaling of free fatty acid receptors

Free fatty acid receptors 1-4 (FFA1-4) are class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). FFA1-3 share substantial sequence similarity whereas FFA4 is unrelated. Despite this FFA1 and FFA4 are activated by the same range of long chain fatty acids (LCFAs) whilst FFA2 and FFA3 are instead activated by short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) generated by the intestinal microbiota. Each of FFA1, 2 and 4 are promising targets for novel drug development in metabolic and inflammatory conditions. To gain insights into the basis of ligand interactions with, and molecular mechanisms underlying activation of, FFAs by LCFAs and SCFAs, we determined the active structures of FFA1 and FFA4 bound to the polyunsaturated LCFA docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), FFA4 bound to the synthetic agonist TUG-891, as well as SCFA butyrate-bound FFA2, each complexed with an engineered heterotrimeric Gq protein (miniGq), by cryo-electron microscopy. Together with computational simulations and mutagenesis studies, we elucidated the similarities and differences in the binding modes of fatty acid ligands with varying chain lengths to their respective GPCRs. Our findings unveil distinct mechanisms of receptor activation and G protein coupling. We anticipate that these outcomes will facilitate structure-based drug development and underpin future research to understand allosteric modulation and biased signaling of this group of GPCRs.

CovET: A covariation-evolutionary trace method that identifies protein structure-function modules

Measuring the relative effect that any two sequence positions have on each other may improve protein design or help better interpret coding variants. Current approaches use statistics and machine learning but rarely consider phylogenetic divergences which, as shown by Evolutionary Trace studies, provide insight into the functional impact of sequence perturbations. Here, we reframe covariation analyses in the Evolutionary Trace framework to measure the relative tolerance to perturbation of each residue pair during evolution. This approach (CovET) systematically accounts for phylogenetic divergences: at each divergence event, we penalize covariation patterns that belie evolutionary coupling. We find that while CovET approximates the performance of existing methods to predict individual structural contacts, it performs significantly better at finding structural clusters of coupled residues and ligand binding sites. For example, CovET found more functionally critical residues when we examined the RNA recognition motif and WW domains. It correlates better with large-scale epistasis screen data. In the dopamine D2 receptor, top CovET residue pairs recovered accurately the allosteric activation pathway characterized for Class A G protein-coupled receptors. These data suggest that CovET ranks highest the sequence position pairs that play critical functional roles through epistatic and allosteric interactions in evolutionarily relevant structure-function motifs. CovET complements current methods and may shed light on fundamental molecular mechanisms of protein structure and function.

Bringing GPCR Structural Biology to Medical Applications: Insights from Both V2 Vasopressin and Mu-Opioid Receptors

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are versatile signaling proteins that regulate key physiological processes in response to a wide variety of extracellular stimuli. The last decade has seen a revolution in the structural biology of clinically important GPCRs. Indeed, the improvement in molecular and biochemical methods to study GPCRs and their transducer complexes, together with advances in cryo-electron microscopy, NMR development, and progress in molecular dynamic simulations, have led to a better understanding of their regulation by ligands of different efficacy and bias. This has also renewed a great interest in GPCR drug discovery, such as finding biased ligands that can either promote or not promote specific regulations. In this review, we focus on two therapeutically relevant GPCR targets, the V2 vasopressin receptor (V2R) and the mu-opioid receptor (µOR), to shed light on the recent structural biology studies and show the impact of this integrative approach on the determination of new potential clinical effective compounds.

In Vitro Pharmacological Profile of KW-6356, a Novel Adenosine A2A Receptor Antagonist/Inverse Agonist

KW-6356 is a novel adenosine A2A (A2A) receptor antagonist/inverse agonist, and its efficacy as monotherapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients has been reported. Istradefylline is a first-generation A2A receptor antagonist approved for use as adjunct treatment to levodopa/decarboxylase inhibitor in adult PD patients experiencing "OFF" episodes. In this study, we investigated the in vitro pharmacological profile of KW-6356 as an A2A receptor antagonist/inverse agonist and the mode of antagonism and compared them with istradefylline. In addition, we determined cocrystal structures of A2A receptor in complex with KW-6356 and istradefylline to explore the structural basis of the antagonistic properties of KW-6356. Pharmacological studies have shown that KW-6356 is a potent and selective ligand for the A2A receptor (the -log of inhibition constant = 9.93 ± 0.01 for human receptor) with a very low dissociation rate from the receptor (the dissociation kinetic rate constant = 0.016 ± 0.006 minute-1 for human receptor). In particular, in vitro functional studies indicated that KW-6356 exhibits insurmountable antagonism and inverse agonism, whereas istradefylline exhibits surmountable antagonism. Crystallography of KW-6356- and istradefylline-bound A2A receptor have indicated that interactions with His2506.52 and Trp2466.48 are essential for the inverse agonism, whereas the interactions at both deep inside the orthosteric pocket and the pocket lid stabilizing the extracellular loop conformation may contribute to the insurmountable antagonism of KW-6356. These profiles may reflect important differences in vivo and help predict better clinical performance. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: KW-6356 is a potent and selective adenosine A2A receptor antagonist/inverse agonist and exhibits insurmountable antagonism, whereas istradefylline, a first-generation adenosine A2A receptor antagonist, exhibits surmountable antagonism. Structural studies of adenosine A2A receptor in complex with KW-6356 and istradefylline explain the characteristic differences in the pharmacological properties of KW-6356 and istradefylline.

G protein-coupled receptors in neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders

Neuropsychiatric disorders are multifactorial disorders with diverse aetiological factors. Identifying treatment targets is challenging because the diseases are resulting from heterogeneous biological, genetic, and environmental factors. Nevertheless, the increasing understanding of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) opens a new possibility in drug discovery. Harnessing our knowledge of molecular mechanisms and structural information of GPCRs will be advantageous for developing effective drugs. This review provides an overview of the role of GPCRs in various neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases. Besides, we highlight the emerging opportunities of novel GPCR targets and address recent progress in GPCR drug development.

Neprilysin-dependent neuropeptide Y cleavage in the liver promotes fibrosis by blocking NPY-receptor 1

Development of liver fibrosis is paralleled by contraction of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs), the main profibrotic hepatic cells. Yet, little is known about the interplay of neprilysin (NEP) and its substrate neuropeptide Y (NPY), a potent enhancer of contraction, in liver fibrosis. We demonstrate that HSCs are the source of NEP. Importantly, NPY originates majorly from the splanchnic region and is cleaved by NEP in order to terminate contraction. Interestingly, NEP deficiency (Nep-/-) showed less fibrosis but portal hypertension upon liver injury in two different fibrosis models in mice. We demonstrate the incremental benefit of Nep-/- in addition to AT1R blocker (ARB) or ACE inhibitors for fibrosis and portal hypertension. Finally, oral administration of Entresto, a combination of ARB and NEP inhibitor, decreased hepatic fibrosis and portal pressure in mice. These results provide a mechanistic rationale for translation of NEP-AT1R-blockade in human liver fibrosis and portal hypertension.

All-Atom Molecular Dynamics Simulations Indicated the Involvement of a Conserved Polar Signaling Channel in the Activation Mechanism of the Type I Cannabinoid Receptor

The type I cannabinoid G protein-coupled receptor (CB1, GPCR) is an intensely investigated pharmacological target, owing to its involvement in numerous physiological functions as well as pathological processes such as cancers, neurodegenerative diseases, metabolic disorders and neuropathic pain. In order to develop modern medications that exert their effects through binding to the CB1 receptor, it is essential to understand the structural mechanism of activation of this protein. The pool of atomic resolution experimental structures of GPCRs has been expanding rapidly in the past decade, providing invaluable information about the function of these receptors. According to the current state of the art, the activity of GPCRs involves structurally distinct, dynamically interconverting functional states and the activation is controlled by a cascade of interconnecting conformational switches in the transmembrane domain. A current challenge is to uncover how different functional states are activated and what specific ligand properties are responsible for the selectivity towards those different functional states. Our recent studies of the μ-opioid and β₂-adrenergic receptors (MOP and β₂AR, respectively) revealed that the orthosteric binding pockets and the intracellular surfaces of these receptors are connected through a channel of highly conserved polar amino acids whose dynamic motions are in high correlation in the agonist- and G protein-bound active states. This and independent literature data led us to hypothesize that, in addition to consecutive conformational transitions, a shift of macroscopic polarization takes place in the transmembrane domain, which is furnished by the rearrangement of polar species through their concerted movements. Here, we examined the CB1 receptor signaling complexes utilizing microsecond scale, all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations in order to see if our previous assumptions could be applied to the CB1 receptor too. Apart from the identification of the previously proposed general features of the activation mechanism, several specific properties of the CB1 have been indicated that could possibly be associated with the signaling profile of this receptor.

Structural Basis for Agonistic Activity and Selectivity toward Melatonin Receptors hMT1 and hMT2

Glaucoma, a major ocular neuropathy originating from a progressive degeneration of retinal ganglion cells, is often associated with increased intraocular pressure (IOP). Daily IOP fluctuations are physiologically influenced by the antioxidant and signaling activities of melatonin. This endogenous modulator has limited employment in treating altered IOP disorders due to its low stability and bioavailability. The search for low-toxic compounds as potential melatonin agonists with higher stability and bioavailability than melatonin itself could start only from knowing the molecular basis of melatonergic activity. Thus, using a computational approach, we studied the melatonin binding toward its natural macromolecular targets, namely melatonin receptors 1 (MT1) and 2 (MT2), both involved in IOP signaling regulation. Besides, agomelatine, a melatonin-derivative agonist and, at the same time, an atypical antidepressant, was also included in the study due to its powerful IOP-lowering effects. For both ligands, we evaluated both stability and ligand positioning inside the orthosteric site of MTs, mapping the main molecular interactions responsible for receptor activation. Affinity values in terms of free binding energy (ΔG_bind) were calculated for the selected poses of the chosen compounds after stabilization through a dynamic molecular docking protocol. The results were compared with experimental in vivo effects, showing a higher potency and more durable effect for agomelatine with respect to melatonin, which could be ascribed both to its higher affinity for hMT2 and to its additional activity as an antagonist for the serotonin receptor 5-HT2c, in agreement with the in silico results.

Common and selective signal transduction mechanisms of GPCRs

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are coupled by four major subfamilies of G proteins. GPCR coupling is processed through a combination of common and selective activation mechanisms together. Common mechanisms are shared for a group of receptors. Recently, researchers managed to identify shared activation pathways for the GPCRs belonging to the same subfamilies. On the other hand, selective mechanisms are responsible for the variations within activation mechanisms. Selective processes can regulate subfamily-specific interactions between the receptor and the G proteins, and intermediate receptor conformations are required to couple particular G proteins through G protein-specific activation mechanisms. Moreover, G proteins can also selectively interact with RGS (regulators of G protein signaling) proteins as well. Selective processes modulate the signaling profile of the receptor and the tissue they are present. This chapter summarizes the recent research conducted on common and selective signal transduction mechanisms within GPCRs from an evolutionary perspective.

Structures of the arginine-vasopressin and oxytocin receptor signaling complexes

Arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and oxytocin (OT) are neurohypophysial hormones which share a high sequence and structure homology. These are two cyclic C-terminally amidated nonapeptides with different residues at position 3 and 8. In mammals, AVP and OT exert their multiple biological functions through a specific G protein-coupled receptor family: four receptors are identified, the V1a, V1b, V2 receptors (V1aR, V1bR and V2R) and the OT receptor (OTR). The chemical structure of AVP and OT was elucidated in the early 1950s. Thanks to X-ray crystallography and cryo-electron microscopy, it took however 70 additional years to determine the three-dimensional structures of the OTR and the V2R in complex with their natural agonist ligands and with different signaling partners, G proteins and β-arrestins. Today, the comparison of the different AVP/OT receptor structures gives structural insights into their orthosteric ligand binding pocket, their molecular mechanisms of activation, and their interfaces with canonical Gs, Gq and β-arrestin proteins. It also paves the way to future rational drug design and therapeutic compound development. Indeed, agonist, antagonist, biased agonist, or pharmacological chaperone analogues of AVP and OT are promising candidates to regulate different physiological functions and treat several pathologies.

Homology Modeling of the G Protein-Coupled Receptors

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are therapeutically important family of membrane proteins. Despite growing number of experimental structures available for GPCRs, homology modeling remains a relevant method for studying these receptors and for discovering new ligands for them. Here we describe the state-of-the-art methods for modeling GPCRs, starting from template selection, through fine-tuning sequence alignment to model refinement.

Superconserved receptors expressed in the brain: Expression, function, motifs and evolution of an orphan receptor family

GPR27, GPR85 and GPR173 constitute a small family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) that share the distinctive characteristics of being highly conserved throughout vertebrate evolution and predominantly expressed in the brain. Accordingly, they have been coined as "Superconserved Receptors Expressed in the Brain" (SREB), although their expression profile is more complex than what was originally thought. SREBs have no known validated endogenous ligands and are thus labeled as "orphan" receptors. The investigation of this particular category of uncharacterized receptors holds great promise both in terms of physiology and drug development. In the largest GPCR family, the Rhodopsin-like or Class A, around 100 receptors are considered orphans. Because GPCRs are the most successful source of drug targets, the discovery of a novel function or ligand most likely will lead to significant breakthroughs for the discovery of innovative therapies. The high level of conservation is one of the characteristic features of the SREBs. We propose herein a detailed analysis of the putative evolutionary origin of this family. We highlight the properties that distinguish SREBs from other rhodopsin-like GPCRs. We present the current evidence for these receptors downstream signaling pathways and functions. We discuss the pharmacological challenge for the identification of natural or synthetic ligands of orphan receptors like SREBs. The different SREB-related scientific questions are presented with a highlight on what should be addressed in the near future, including the confirmation of published evidence and their validation as drug targets. In particular, we discuss in which pathological conditions these receptors may be of great relevance to solve unmet medical needs.

Biased Activation Mechanism Induced by GPCR Heterodimerization: Observations from μOR/δOR Dimers

GPCRs regulate multiple intracellular signaling cascades. Biasedly activating one signaling pathway over the others provides additional clinical utility to optimize GPCR-based therapies. GPCR heterodimers possess different functions from their monomeric states, including their selectivity to different transducers. However, the biased signaling mechanism induced by the heterodimerization remains unclear. Motivated by the issue, we select an important GPCR heterodimer (μOR/δOR heterodimer) as a case and use microsecond Gaussian accelerated molecular dynamics simulation coupled with potential of mean force and protein structure network (PSN) to probe mechanisms regarding the heterodimerization-induced constitutive β-arrestin activity and efficacy change of the agonist DAMGO. The results show that only the lowest energy state of the μOR/δOR heterodimer, which adopts a slightly outward shift of TM6 and an ICL2 conformation close to the receptor core, can selectively accommodate β-arrestins. PSN further reveals important roles of H8, ICL1, and ICL2 in regulating the constitutive β-arrestin-biased activity for the apo μOR/δOR heterodimer. In addition, the heterodimerization can allosterically alter the binding mode of DAMGO mainly by means of W7.35. Consequently, DAMGO transmits the structural signal mainly through TM6 and TM7 in the dimer, rather than TM3 similar to the μOR monomer, thus changing the efficacy of DAMGO from a balanced agonist to the β-arrestin-biased one. On the other side, the binding of DAMGO to the heterodimer can stabilize μOR/δOR heterodimers through a stronger interaction of TM1/TM1 and H8/H8, accordingly enhancing the interaction of μOR with δOR and the binding affinity of the dimer to the β-arrestin. The agonist DAMGO does not change main compositions of the regulation network from the dimer interface to the transducer binding pocket of the μOR protomer, but induces an increase in the structural communication of the network, which should contribute to the enhanced β-arrestin coupling. Our observations, for the first time, reveal the molecular mechanism of the biased signaling induced by the heterodimerization for GPCRs, which should be beneficial to more comprehensively understand the GPCR bias signaling.

Class A and C GPCR Dimers in Neurodegenerative Diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases affect over 30 million people worldwide with an ascending trend. Most individuals suffering from these irreversible brain damages belong to the elderly population, with onset between 50 and 60 years. Although the pathophysiology of such diseases is partially known, it remains unclear upon which point a disease turns degenerative. Moreover, current therapeutics can treat some of the symptoms but often have severe side effects and become less effective in long-term treatment. For many neurodegenerative diseases, the involvement of G proteincoupled receptors (GPCRs), which are key players of neuronal transmission and plasticity, has become clearer and holds great promise in elucidating their biological mechanism. With this review, we introduce and summarize class A and class C GPCRs, known to form heterodimers or oligomers to increase their signalling repertoire. Additionally, the examples discussed here were shown to display relevant alterations in brain signalling and had already been associated with the pathophysiology of certain neurodegenerative diseases. Lastly, we classified the heterodimers into two categories of crosstalk, positive or negative, for which there is known evidence.

Binding of a positive allosteric modulator CDPPB to metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5) probed by all-atom molecular dynamics simulations

Positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5) potentiate positive receptor response and may be effective for the treatment of schizophrenia and cognitive disorders. Although crystal structures of mGluR5 complexed with the negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) are available, no crystal structure of mGluR5 complexed with PAM has been reported to date. Thus, conformational changes associated with the binding of PAMs to mGluR5 remain elusive. Here, a PAM CDPPB, and two NAMs MTEP and MFZ10-7 used as a negative control, were docked to the crystal structure. The docked complexes were submitted to molecular dynamics simulations to examine the activation of the PAM system. An MM/GBSA binding energy calculation was performed to estimate binding strength. Furthermore, molecular switch analysis was done to get insights into conformational changes of the receptor. The PAM CDPPB displays a stronger binding affinity for mGluR5 and induces conformational changes. Also, a salt bridge between TM3 and TM7, corresponding to the ionic lock switch in class A GPCRs is found to be broken. The PAM-induced receptor conformation is more like the agonist-induced conformation than the antagonist-induced conformation, suggesting that PAM works by inducing conformation change and stabilizing the active receptor conformation.

Recent Molecular Insights into Agonist-specific Binding to the Mu-Opioid Receptor

Opioid agonists produce their analgesic effects primarily by acting at the µ-opioid receptor (µOR). µOR agonists with different efficacies exert diverse molecular changes in the µOR which dictate the faith of the receptor’s signaling pathway and possibly it’s the degree of desensitization. Since the development of the active conformations of the µOR, growing data have been published in relation to ligand-specific changes in µOR activation. In this regard, this review summarizes recent data regarding the most studied opioid agonists in in silico µOR activation, including how these ligands are recognized by the µOR, how their binding signal is transmitted toward the intracellular parts of the µOR, and finally, what type of large-scale movements do these changes trigger in the µOR’s domains.

In Search of Synergistic Insect Repellents: Modeling of Muscarinic GPCR Interactions with Classical and Bitopic Photoactive Ligands

Insect vector-borne diseases pose serious health problems, so there is a high demand for efficient molecules that could reduce transmission. Using molecular docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, we studied a series of compounds acting on human and insect muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs), a novel target of synergistic agents in pest control. We characterized early conformational changes of human M1 and fruit fly type-A mAChR G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in response to DEET, IR3535, and muscarine binding based on the MD analysis of the activation microswitches known to form the signal transduction pathway in class A GPCRs. We indicated groups of microswitches that are the most affected by the presence of a ligand. Moreover, to increase selectivity towards insects, we proposed a new, bitopic, photoswitchable mAChR ligand—BQCA-azo-IR353 and studied its interactions with both receptors. Modeling data showed that using a bitopic ligand may be a promising strategy in the search for better insect control.

Angiotensin and Endothelin Receptor Structures With Implications for Signaling Regulation and Pharmacological Targeting

In conjunction with the endothelin (ET) type A (ETAR) and type B (ETBR) receptors, angiotensin (AT) type 1 (AT1R) and type 2 (AT2R) receptors, are peptide-binding class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) acting in a physiologically overlapping context. Angiotensin receptors (ATRs) are involved in regulating cell proliferation, as well as cardiovascular, renal, neurological, and endothelial functions. They are important therapeutic targets for several diseases or pathological conditions, such as hypertrophy, vascular inflammation, atherosclerosis, angiogenesis, and cancer. Endothelin receptors (ETRs) are expressed primarily in blood vessels, but also in the central nervous system or epithelial cells. They regulate blood pressure and cardiovascular homeostasis. Pathogenic conditions associated with ETR dysfunctions include cancer and pulmonary hypertension. While both receptor groups are activated by their respective peptide agonists, pathogenic autoantibodies (auto-Abs) can also activate the AT1R and ETAR accompanied by respective clinical conditions. To date, the exact mechanisms and differences in binding and receptor-activation mediated by auto-Abs as opposed to endogenous ligands are not well understood. Further, several questions regarding signaling regulation in these receptors remain open. In the last decade, several receptor structures in the apo- and ligand-bound states were determined with protein X-ray crystallography using conventional synchrotrons or X-ray Free-Electron Lasers (XFEL). These inactive and active complexes provide detailed information on ligand binding, signal induction or inhibition, as well as signal transduction, which is fundamental for understanding properties of different activity states. They are also supportive in the development of pharmacological strategies against dysfunctions at the receptors or in the associated signaling axis. Here, we summarize current structural information for the AT1R, AT2R, and ETBR to provide an improved molecular understanding.

The Many Faces of G Protein-Coupled Receptor 143, an Atypical Intracellular Receptor

GPCRs transform extracellular stimuli into a physiological response by activating an intracellular signaling cascade initiated via binding to G proteins. Orphan G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) hold the potential to pave the way for development of new, innovative therapeutic strategies. In this review we will introduce G protein-coupled receptor 143 (GPR143), an enigmatic receptor in terms of classification within the GPCR superfamily and localization. GPR143 has not been assigned to any of the GPCR families due to the lack of common structural motifs. Hence we will describe the most important motifs of classes A and B and compare them to the protein sequence of GPR143. While a precise function for the receptor has yet to be determined, the protein is expressed abundantly in pigment producing cells. Many GPR143 mutations cause X-linked Ocular Albinism Type 1 (OA1, Nettleship-Falls OA), which results in hypopigmentation of the eyes and loss of visual acuity due to disrupted visual system development and function. In pigment cells of the skin, loss of functional GPR143 results in abnormally large melanosomes (organelles in which pigment is produced). Studies have shown that the receptor is localized internally, including at the melanosomal membrane, where it may function to regulate melanosome size and/or facilitate protein trafficking to the melanosome through the endolysosomal system. Numerous additional roles have been proposed for GPR143 in determining cancer predisposition, regulation of blood pressure, development of macular degeneration and signaling in the brain, which we will briefly describe as well as potential ligands that have been identified. Furthermore, GPR143 is a promiscuous receptor that has been shown to interact with multiple other melanosomal proteins and GPCRs, which strongly suggests that this orphan receptor is likely involved in many different physiological actions.

Activation Mechanism of Strigolactone Receptors and Its Impact on Ligand Selectivity between Host and Parasitic Plants

Parasitic weeds such as Striga have led to significant losses in agricultural productivity worldwide. These weeds use the plant hormone strigolactone as a germination stimulant. Strigolactone signaling involves substrate hydrolysis followed by a conformational change of the receptor to a "closed" or "active" state that associates with a signaling partner, MAX2/D3. Crystal structures of active and inactive AtD14 receptors have helped elucidate the structural changes involved in activation. However, the mechanism by which the receptor activates remains unknown. The ligand dependence of AtD14 activation has been disputed by mutagenesis studies showing that enzymatically inactive receptors are able to associate with MAX2 proteins. Furthermore, activation differences between strigolactone receptor in Striga, ShHTL7, and AtD14 could contribute to the high sensitivity to strigolactones exhibited by parasitic plants. Using molecular dynamics simulations, we demonstrate that both AtD14 and ShHTL7 could adopt an active conformation in the absence of ligand. However, ShHTL7 exhibits a higher population in the inactive apo state as compared to the AtD14 receptor. We demonstrate that this difference in inactive state population is caused by sequence differences between their D-loops and interactions with the catalytic histidine that prevent full binding pocket closure in ShHTL7. These results indicate that ligand hydrolysis would enhance the active state population by destabilizing the inactive state in ShHTL7 as compared to AtD14. We also show that the mechanism of activation is more concerted in AtD14 than in ShHTL7 and that the main barrier to activation in ShHTL7 is closing of the binding pocket.

Phenylalanine 193 in Extracellular Loop 2 of the β 2-Adrenergic Receptor Coordinates β-Arrestin Interaction

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) transduce a diverse variety of extracellular stimuli into intracellular signaling. These receptors are the most clinically productive drug targets at present. Despite decades of research on the signaling consequences of molecule-receptor interactions, conformational components of receptor-effector interactions remain incompletely described. The β 2-adrenergic receptor (β 2AR) is a prototypical and extensively studied GPCR that can provide insight into this aspect of GPCR signaling thanks to robust structural data and rich pharmacopeia. Using bioluminescence resonance energy transfer -based biosensors, second messenger assays, and biochemical techniques, we characterize the properties of β 2AR-F193A. This single point mutation in extracellular loop 2 of the β 2AR is sufficient to intrinsically bias the β 2AR away from β-arrestin interaction and demonstrates altered regulatory outcomes downstream of this functional selectivity. This study highlights the importance of extracellular control of intracellular response to stimuli and suggests a previously undescribed role for the extracellular loops of the receptor and the extracellular pocket formed by transmembrane domains 2, 3, and 7 in GPCR regulation that may contribute to biased signaling at GPCRs. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The role of extracellular G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) domains in mediating intracellular interactions is poorly understood. We characterized the effects of extracellular loop mutations on agonist-promoted interactions of GPCRs with G protein and β-arrestin. Our studies reveal that F193 in extracellular loop 2 in the β2-adrenergic receptor mediates interactions with G protein and β-arrestin with a biased loss of β-arrestin binding. These results provide new insights on the role of the extracellular domain in differentially modulating intracellular interactions with GPCRs.