A tool to guide the selection of impact categories for LCA studies by using the representativeness index

Environmental impacts, human health, and energy consumption of nitrogen management for maize production in subtropical region

Over-application of fertilizers could not improve crop yield and agronomic efficiency, but result in increasing nitrogen (N) surplus and adverse effects on the ecosystem sustainability. Although some previous studies have addressed one or a few environmental aspects in crop production, an integrated assessment for the effects of N fertilizer on multiple environmental impacts, and the optional steps of normalization and weighting is required. A consecutive 2-year plot-based field experiment was conducted with five N fertilizer levels (0, 90, 180, 270, and 360 kg N ha-1) in maize production at three sites in Southwest China, to evaluate the environmental performance and sustainability through joint use of life cycle assessment (LCA) and energy consumption analysis. Results demonstrated that the optimal N rate (180 kg N ha-1) showed greater potential for maintaining high yield (achieved 86% of the yield potential) and reducing the global warming (- 31%), acidification (- 47%), eutrophication (- 44%) compared to farmers' practice, and energy depletion potentials, by reducing pollutants emission during the production and transportation of N fertilizer and Nr losses at farm stage. Optimal N treatment indirectly reduced the land use, life-cycle human toxicity, aquatic eco-toxicity, and terrestrial eco-toxicity potentials by improving grain yield and agronomic efficiency. In addition, the optimal N treatment reduced the energy consumption by enhancing the energy use efficiency (EUE) (+ 74%) and reducing non-renewable energy form (- 45%) than the farmer's practice. This study will provide comprehensive information for both scientists and farmers involved in maize production and N management in subtropical region.

The limitations of bioeconomy LCA studies for understanding the transition to sustainable bioeconomy

Purpose

Transition to bioeconomy requires all actors and stakeholders to measure the impact of systems that use bioresources and technologies to provision society. There are however some challenges with integrating LCA into business development and management, which have important implications for bioeconomy. There have been many LCA studies published in the twenty-first century, but the question must be answered: how useful are these LCA studies to help understand and manage transition to sustainable bioeconomy?

Method

This research used a structured literature review to identify 83 bioeconomy LCA studies published from January 2006 to June 2021 (excluding bioenergy). The studies were analysed for compliance with the ISO 14044 standard, with specific reference to the goal, commissioning perspective, system boundary, function and functional unit, impact methods and categories.

Results and discussions

It was found that more than 85% of the studies reviewed failed to present the required goal statement and a description of the function of the system. Nearly 13% of the studies did not define the system boundary, and only 17% included a full life cycle including raw material extraction, production, use and end-of-life stages. The majority of the LCA studies surveyed from 2006 to 2021 were either (i) not in compliance with the ISO standards or (ii) space and style limitations of the publication process prevented competent practitioners from properly conveying their work. This suggests that the value and integrity of the literature are undermined by not rigorously addressing the first and most important stage of an LCA study.

Conclusion

When interpreting the results, a major shortcoming noted was that most studies did not consider the industrial symbiosis needed between feedstock, technology, primary products, side streams, downstream valorisation and long-term circularity in order to properly understand the transition pathways required. Bioeconomy technologies were imagined as displacers for feedstocks and processes to adapt business as usual, rather than as transformers of the system to a sustainable footing.

Recommendation

If LCA studies are going to provide meaningful information for actors and stakeholders to assess whether a system will be able to operate sustainably, studies should include a full, integrated system, standards should be adhered to and approaches should perhaps go beyond mere eco-efficiency, or doing less harm, as these are not necessarily indicative of sustainability. Historical bioeconomy LCA studies do not provide great insight into the transition to sustainable bioeconomy.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11367-022-02053-w.

Development of Streamlined Life-Cycle Assessment for the Solid Waste Management System

Life-cycle assessments (LCAs) of municipal solid waste management (MSWM) systems are time- and data-intensive. Reducing the data requirements for inventory and impact assessments will facilitate the wider use of LCAs during early system planning and design. Therefore, the objective of this study is to develop a systematic framework for streamlining LCAs by identifying the most critical impacts, life-cycle inventory emissions, and inputs based on their contributions to the total impacts and their effect on the rankings of 18 alternative MSWM scenarios. The scenarios are composed of six treatment processes: landfills, waste-to-energy combustion, single-stream recycling, mixed waste recycling, anaerobic digestion, and composting. The full LCA uses 1752 flows of resources and emissions, 10 impact categories, 3 normalization references, and 7 weighting schemes, and these were reduced using the streamlined LCA approach proposed in this study. Human health cancer, ecotoxicity, eutrophication, and fossil fuel depletion contribute 75-83% to the total impacts across all scenarios. It was found that 3.3% of the inventory flows contribute ≥95% of the overall environmental impact. The highest-ranked strategies are consistent between the streamlined and full LCAs. The results provide guidance on which impacts, flows, and inputs to prioritize during early strategy design.

Consistent normalization approach for Life Cycle Assessment based on inventory databases

The process-based life cycle assessments (LCA) of goods and services are calculated using a bottom-up approach related to a functional unit. However, this does not provide any information regarding the scale of the environmental impacts. Therefore, the normalization allows to relate the impacts to a reference system (specific countries, regions or even the whole world). These references are usually obtained from top-down approach. The different data sources introduce inconsistencies on results and raise doubts on their adequacy and representativity. This paper proposes a novel approach for determining the data for the reference in order to ensure consistency about boundaries, data sources and modelling hypotheses describing the system. For this purpose, normalization is applied as an expression of the result relative to the average component of the reference system, instead of the sum of all the components. The reference values are determined from the geometric means of the datasets of the inventory database, used for assessing the studied systems. The exemplary application to the ecoinvent databases provides normalization references for 878 versions of the impacts categories listed by ecoinvent and for the 2077 involved substances. For eight impact assessment methods, the results are compared with 16 normalization sets from the literature and point out highly significant correlations.