1
|
Harris CB, Benjamins S, Scott B, Williamson BJ. Ecological impacts of floating offshore wind on marine mammals and associated trophic interactions: current evidence and knowledge gaps. MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN 2025; 218:118059. [PMID: 40381440 DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2025.118059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2025] [Revised: 04/25/2025] [Accepted: 04/26/2025] [Indexed: 05/20/2025]
Abstract
Floating offshore wind is expected to expand globally into further offshore, deeper and highly productive shelf seas to utilise increased and more consistent wind energy. Marine mammals represent mobile species that connect across regions and can indicate wider ecosystem changes. To date, only a handful of ecological impact studies have been conducted at floating offshore wind farms, due to the infancy of the technology and small numbers of operational sites. Understanding how floating offshore wind could alter ecosystem functions and impact species at individual and population levels will be essential to mitigate potential negative ecological impacts as the sector expands. Currently, numerous floating offshore wind sites are planned or already in development. Therefore, evaluating current knowledge and remaining knowledge gaps will benefit future projects in assessing ecological impacts and determining where additional research should be conducted. This review summarises the positive and negative ecological impacts that have been previously highlighted as potential impacts from floating offshore wind, focusing on marine mammals, whilst also considering prey and broader trophic interactions. Current studies at operational floating offshore wind sites are summarised and discussed in context of observed and/or anticipated impacts. Finally, key outstanding research areas are suggested in relation to each impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin B Harris
- Environmental Research Institute (ERI), University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI), Ormlie Road, Thurso KW14 7EE, UK.
| | - Steven Benjamins
- Scottish Association for Marine Science (SAMS), University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI), Oban PA37 1QA, UK
| | - Beth Scott
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen AB24 2TZ, UK
| | - Benjamin J Williamson
- Environmental Research Institute (ERI), University of the Highlands and Islands (UHI), Ormlie Road, Thurso KW14 7EE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Feist BE, Griffin R, Samhouri JF, Riekkola L, Shelton AO, Chen YA, Somers K, Andrews K, Liu OR, Ise J. Mapping the value of commercial fishing and potential costs of offshore wind energy on the U.S: West Coast: Towards an assessment of resource use tradeoffs. PLoS One 2025; 20:e0315319. [PMID: 40048446 PMCID: PMC11884673 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/09/2025] Open
Abstract
The West Coast of the U.S. has a vast offshore wind energy (OWE) electricity generation potential with value on the order of billions of USD, and pressure is mounting to develop large OWE projects. However, this seascape has numerous existing resource extraction uses, including a multi-billion dollar commercial fishing industry, which create the potential for conflict. To date, spatially explicit comparisons of OWE and commercial fisheries value have not been done, but are essential for marine spatial planning and for investigating the tradeoffs of OWE development on existing marine uses. In this analysis, we generate maps of OWE levelized cost of energy and of total economic activity generated by the top eight commercial fishing targets that account for the vast majority (~84%) of landed revenue off the U.S. West Coast. We quantify spatial overlap between these two ocean uses and use multiobjective optimization to develop tradeoff frontiers to investigate implications for both sectors from established state goals or mandates for OWE power generation capacity. There are clear differences in the exposure of each fishery in their traditional fishing grounds as a function of differing OWE capacity goals and outcomes vary depending on whether OWE development goals are achieved at a state-by-state level or a region-wide level. Responsible siting of OWE projects includes careful consideration of existing commercial fishing activities, and responsible transition to renewable energies on the West Coast and elsewhere accounts for the socio-economic consequences of the total economic activity associated with each fishery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Blake E. Feist
- Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Robert Griffin
- Office of Research and Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Narragansett, Rhode Island, United States of America
- Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Jameal F. Samhouri
- Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Leena Riekkola
- NRC Research Associateship Program, Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Andrew O. Shelton
- Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Y. Allen Chen
- Fishery Resource Analysis and Monitoring Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Kayleigh Somers
- Fishery Resource Analysis and Monitoring Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Kelly Andrews
- Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Owen R. Liu
- Ocean Associates Inc., under contract to the Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, Washington, United States of Aerica
| | - Jennifer Ise
- West Coast Regional Office, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Long Beach, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hale R, Thompson D, Brough T, Kregting L, Hayden (Ngāti Huia ki Poroutāwhao, Ngāti Raukawa ki te Tonga, Te Ātiawa ki Whakarongotai, Ngāti Toa, Ngāti Pākeha) M, Parsons D, Nodder SD, Beaumont J, Anderson O, Stevens C. Environmental implications of future offshore renewable energy development in Aotearoa New Zealand. J R Soc N Z 2024; 55:912-945. [PMID: 40337496 PMCID: PMC12054580 DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2024.2406829] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2025]
Abstract
Global climate mitigation efforts seeking to reduce greenhouse gas emissions require more renewable energy generation and utilisation. In Aotearoa New Zealand there are initiatives underway to develop offshore wind, or in the future, arrays of tidal turbines or wave energy converters, as a new energy resource. Here we synthesise available knowledge from international developments in offshore windfarm installations and discuss in a local Aotearoa New Zealand context. Aspects described include habitat modification, consequences of physical water column changes, and effects on benthic organisms, fish and fisheries, seabirds and marine mammals. Importantly, there is a need to adhere to Te Tiriti o Waitangi which defines Māori sovereign rights and expectations in terms of guardianship of resources (kaitiakitanga). Based on recent regulatory applications in marine spatial planning, where developments have been subject to the precautionary principle for environmental impacts, comprehensive environmental information will be critical for obtaining approval to proceed. The present synthesis identifies environmental pressure-points, footprints, and knowledge gaps, such as New Zealand-specific seabird and marine mammal behaviour and discusses potential opportunities to leverage the positive impacts of marine renewable energy developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Hale
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Nelson, New Zealand
| | - David Thompson
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Tom Brough
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Louise Kregting
- The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Ltd, Nelson, New Zealand
| | | | - Darren Parsons
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Scott D. Nodder
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jennifer Beaumont
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Owen Anderson
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Craig Stevens
- National Institute of Water & Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
- University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thébaud O, Boschetti F. A tale of two sectors: Offshore wind and fisheries out for a row in the ocean. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 359:121060. [PMID: 38714037 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
|
5
|
Kruse M, Letschert J, Cormier R, Rambo H, Gee K, Kannen A, Schaper J, Möllmann C, Stelzenmüller V. Operationalizing a fisheries social-ecological system through a Bayesian belief network reveals hotspots for its adaptive capacity in the southern North sea. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 357:120685. [PMID: 38552519 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
Fisheries social-ecological systems (SES) in the North Sea region confront multifaceted challenges stemming from environmental changes, offshore wind farm expansion, and marine protected area establishment. In this paper, we demonstrate the utility of a Bayesian Belief Network (BN) approach in comprehensively capturing and assessing the intricate spatial dynamics within the German plaice-related fisheries SES. The BN integrates ecological, economic, and socio-cultural factors to generate high-resolution maps of profitability and adaptive capacity potential (ACP) as prospective management targets. Our analysis of future scenarios, delineating changes in spatial constraints, economics, and socio-cultural aspects, identifies factors that will exert significant influence on this fisheries SES in the near future. These include the loss of fishing grounds due to the installation of offshore wind farms and marine protected areas, as well as reduced plaice landings due to climate change. The identified ACP hotspots hold the potential to guide the development of localized management strategies and sustainable planning efforts by highlighting the consequences of management decisions. Our findings emphasize the need to consider detailed spatial dynamics of fisheries SES within marine spatial planning (MSP) and illustrate how this information may assist decision-makers and practitioners in area prioritization. We, therefore, propose adopting the concept of fisheries SES within broader integrated management approaches to foster sustainable development of inherently dynamic SES in a rapidly evolving marine environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Kruse
- Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Bremerhaven, Germany.
| | - J Letschert
- Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - R Cormier
- Institute of Coastal Systems - Analysis and Modeling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany
| | - H Rambo
- Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, Hamburg, Germany
| | - K Gee
- Institute of Coastal Systems - Analysis and Modeling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany
| | - A Kannen
- Institute of Coastal Systems - Analysis and Modeling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany
| | - J Schaper
- Institute of Coastal Systems - Analysis and Modeling, Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon, Geesthacht, Germany
| | - C Möllmann
- Institute of Marine Ecosystem and Fishery Science, Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN), University Hamburg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Martinez A, Iglesias G. Techno-economic assessment of potential zones for offshore wind energy: A methodology. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2024; 909:168585. [PMID: 37981143 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023]
Abstract
This work presents a methodology for the techno-economic assessment and comparison of potential zones for the development of offshore wind energy. The methodology is illustrated through a case study in North Spain, using the high-potential zones designated by the Spanish government. The main elements considered include the bathymetry (water depths), energy production and total working hours based on the wind climate, maintenance windows based on the wave climate, and distance to selected port facilities that can accommodate the installation and operational and maintenance phases of an offshore wind farm. An interesting dichotomy arises moving from west to east along N Spain - energy production and working hours decrease, but maintenance windows increase. Given that both aspects play a role in the costs of an offshore wind project, pondering them adequately is crucial, and the selection of a particular zone for development may depend on project-specific cost models. Water depths may preclude the installation of bottom-fixed structures in certain areas; importantly, they may also represent a constraint for the deployment of certain floating concepts, particularly in the high-potential zones of the Cantabrian Sea. Finally, ports capable of servicing the offshore wind farms are identified and distances to all high-potential zones, calculated. By examining the unique properties of the high-potential zones, this methodology, which can be applied to other regions of interest for offshore wind, provides valuable insights into the advantages and challenges of offshore wind development at each site and thereby contributes to informed decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Martinez
- School of Engineering & Architecture & MaREI, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland
| | - G Iglesias
- School of Engineering & Architecture & MaREI, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland; University of Plymouth, School of Engineering, Computing & Mathematics, Marine Building, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stelzenmüller V, Rehren J, Örey S, Lemmen C, Krishna S, Hasenbein M, Püts M, Probst WN, Diekmann R, Scheffran J, Bos OG, Wirtz K. Framing future trajectories of human activities in the German North Sea to inform cumulative effects assessments and marine spatial planning. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT 2024; 349:119507. [PMID: 37956520 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
The global industrialization of seascapes and climate change leads to an increased risk of severe impacts on marine ecosystem functioning. While broad scale spatio-temporal assessments of human pressures on marine ecosystems become more available, future trajectories of human activities at regional and local scales remain often speculative. Here we introduce a stepwise process to integrate bottom-up and expert-driven approaches for scenario development to inform cumulative effects assessments and related marine spatial planning (MSP). Following this guidance, we developed optimistic, realistic, and pessimistic scenarios for major human pressures in the German North Sea such as bottom trawling, offshore wind, nutrient discharge, and aggregate extraction. The forecasts comprise quantitative estimates in relation to spatial footprint, intensity, and technological advancements of those pressures for the years 2030 and 2060. Using network analyses, we assessed interactions of the current and future trajectories of pressures thereby accounting for climate change and the growing need for marine conservation. Our results show that future scenarios of spatial distributions could be developed for activities that are spatially refined and included in the current MSP process. Further our detailed analyses of interdependencies of development components revealed that forecasts regarding specific targets and intensities of human activities depend also strongly on future technological advances. For fisheries and nutrient discharge estimates were less certain due to critical socio-ecological interactions in the marine and terrestrial realm. Overall, our approach unraveled such trade-offs and sources of uncertainties. Yet, our quantitative predictive scenarios were built under a sustainability narrative on a profound knowledge of interactions with other sectors and components in and outside the management boundaries. We advocate that they enable a better preparedness for future changes of cumulative pressure on marine ecosystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V Stelzenmüller
- Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Herwigstraße 31, 27572, Bremerhaven, Germany.
| | - J Rehren
- Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Herwigstraße 31, 27572, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - S Örey
- Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Herwigstraße 31, 27572, Bremerhaven, Germany; Hochschule Bremerhaven, An der Karlstadt 8, 27568, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - C Lemmen
- Helmholtz-Center Hereon, Institute of Coastal Systems, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany
| | - S Krishna
- Helmholtz-Center Hereon, Institute of Coastal Systems, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany
| | - M Hasenbein
- Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency, Hamburg, Germany
| | - M Püts
- Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Herwigstraße 31, 27572, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - W N Probst
- Thünen Institute of Sea Fisheries, Herwigstraße 31, 27572, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - R Diekmann
- Hochschule Bremerhaven, An der Karlstadt 8, 27568, Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - J Scheffran
- Institute of Geography, Universität Hamburg, Germany
| | - O G Bos
- Wageningen Marine Research, Ankerpark 27, 1781 AG, Den Helder, the Netherlands
| | - K Wirtz
- Helmholtz-Center Hereon, Institute of Coastal Systems, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502, Geesthacht, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Fournier A, Martinez A, Iglesias G. Impacts of climate change on wind energy potential in Australasia and South-East Asia following the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2023; 882:163347. [PMID: 37084909 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Wind energy is poised to play a major role in the energy transition. Fluctuations in global atmospheric circulation are expected as a result of climate change, and wind projections based on the most up-to-date scenarios of climate change, the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), anticipate significant changes in wind energy potential in many regions; so far, these changes have not been studied in Southeastern Asia and Australasia, a region with notable wind energy potential. This work investigates the evolution of wind power density and its temporal variability considering the latest scenarios of climate change, the SSPs. More specifically, two scenarios are considered, SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5, corresponding to moderate and high emissions, respectively. As many as 18 global climate models are considered and compared against past-present data, and those that perform best are retained to build a large multi-model ensemble. The results show that projected changes in mean wind power density at the end of the 21st century are of little significance (typically below 5 %); nevertheless, this value can be far surpassed locally. In certain areas (e.g., Vietnam, Borneo) and seasons, remarkable changes in wind power density (exceeding 150 %) are anticipated. Typically, mean values and temporal variability changes are greater in the high-emissions scenario, however, seasonal variability is projected to be more pronounced in the moderate-emissions scenario. These effects of climate change on wind energy potential must be taken into account in the development of wind power in the region, for they will affect the energy production and, therefore, the economic viability of wind farms - not least in those areas where drastic changes are projected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fournier
- MINES-Paristech, Rue Claude Daunesse, Sophia Antipolis 06904, France
| | - A Martinez
- MaREI, Environmental Research Institute & School of Engineering, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland
| | - G Iglesias
- MaREI, Environmental Research Institute & School of Engineering, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland; University of Plymouth, School of Engineering, Computing & Mathematics, Marine Building, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Martinez A, Iglesias G. Climate change impacts on wind energy resources in North America based on the CMIP6 projections. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2022; 806:150580. [PMID: 34592301 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
The mid- and long-term evolution of wind energy resources in North America is investigated by means of a multi-model ensemble selected from 18 global climate models. The most recent scenarios of greenhouse gases emissions and land use, the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs), are considered - more specifically, the SSP5-8.5 (intensive emissions) and SSP2-4.5 (moderate emissions). In both scenarios, onshore wind power density in the US and Canada is predicted to drop. Under SSP5-8.5, the reduction is of the order of 15% overall, reaching as much as 40% in certain northern regions - Quebec and Nunavut in Canada and Alaska in the US. Conversely, significant increases in wind power density are predicted in Hudson Bay (up to 25%), Texas and northern Mexico (up to 15%), southern Mexico and Central America (up to 30%). As for the intra-annual variability, it is poised to rise drastically, with monthly average wind power densities increasing up to 120% in certain months and decreasing up to 60% in others. These changes in both the mean value and the intra-annual variability of wind power density are of consequence for the Levelised Cost of Energy from wind, the planning of future investments and, more generally, the contribution of wind to the energy mix.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Martinez
- School of Engineering and Architecture & MaREI, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland
| | - G Iglesias
- School of Engineering and Architecture & MaREI, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, College Road, Cork, Ireland; University of Plymouth, School of Engineering, Computing & Mathematics, Marine Building, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Queirós AM, Talbot E, Beaumont NJ, Somerfield PJ, Kay S, Pascoe C, Dedman S, Fernandes JA, Jueterbock A, Miller PI, Sailley SF, Sará G, Carr LM, Austen MC, Widdicombe S, Rilov G, Levin LA, Hull SC, Walmsley SF, Nic Aonghusa C. Bright spots as climate-smart marine spatial planning tools for conservation and blue growth. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY 2021; 27:5514-5531. [PMID: 34486773 PMCID: PMC9291121 DOI: 10.1111/gcb.15827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
Marine spatial planning that addresses ocean climate-driven change ('climate-smart MSP') is a global aspiration to support economic growth, food security and ecosystem sustainability. Ocean climate change ('CC') modelling may become a key decision-support tool for MSP, but traditional modelling analysis and communication challenges prevent their broad uptake. We employed MSP-specific ocean climate modelling analyses to inform a real-life MSP process; addressing how nature conservation and fisheries could be adapted to CC. We found that the currently planned distribution of these activities may become unsustainable during the policy's implementation due to CC, leading to a shortfall in its sustainability and blue growth targets. Significant, climate-driven ecosystem-level shifts in ocean components underpinning designated sites and fishing activity were estimated, reflecting different magnitudes of shifts in benthic versus pelagic, and inshore versus offshore habitats. Supporting adaptation, we then identified: CC refugia (areas where the ecosystem remains within the boundaries of its present state); CC hotspots (where climate drives the ecosystem towards a new state, inconsistent with each sectors' present use distribution); and for the first time, identified bright spots (areas where oceanographic processes drive range expansion opportunities that may support sustainable growth in the medium term). We thus create the means to: identify where sector-relevant ecosystem change is attributable to CC; incorporate resilient delivery of conservation and sustainable ecosystem management aims into MSP; and to harness opportunities for blue growth where they exist. Capturing CC bright spots alongside refugia within protected areas may present important opportunities to meet sustainability targets while helping support the fishing sector in a changing climate. By capitalizing on the natural distribution of climate resilience within ocean ecosystems, such climate-adaptive spatial management strategies could be seen as nature-based solutions to limit the impact of CC on ocean ecosystems and dependent blue economy sectors, paving the way for climate-smart MSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Susan Kay
- Plymouth Marine LaboratoryPlymouthUK
| | | | - Simon Dedman
- Hopkins Marine StationStanford UniversityStanfordCaliforniaUSA
| | - Jose A. Fernandes
- AZTI‐Tecnalia, Marine ResearchBasque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA)BizkaiaSpain
| | | | | | | | - Gianluca Sará
- Department of Earth and Marine ScienceLaboratory of EcologyUniversity of PalermoPalermoItaly
| | | | | | | | - Gil Rilov
- National Institute of OceanographyIsrael Oceanographic and Limnological Research InstituteHaifaIsrael
| | - Lisa A. Levin
- Scripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of CaliforniaSan DiegoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|