The clinical features of juvenile dermatomyositis: A single-centre inception cohort

Inflammatory Causes of Dysphagia in Children

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are the most common inflammatory causes of pediatric dysphagia, but several other less prevalent conditions should be considered. These conditions can affect one or several aspects of the swallowing process. In some inflammatory conditions dysphagia may be an early symptom. Esophagoscopy and instrumental swallow studies are often needed to determine the underlying diagnosis and best treatment plan. In some inflammatory conditions dysphagia can portend a worse outcome and need for more aggressive treatment of the underlying condition. Consultations with speech language pathology, gastroenterology, dietetics, allergy/immunology and/or rheumatology are often needed to optimize management.

Calcinosis in Juvenile Dermatomyositis-Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Clinical Features, and Treatment: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We performed a systematic review of the literature on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical and laboratory characterization, and treatment of calcinosis in patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). A qualitative systematic review was conducted from January 1975 to April 2023 according to the PRISMA protocol using three electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. Studies were analyzed based on the following eligibility criteria: at least one combination of the terms described in the search strategy appeared in the title, written in English, Portuguese, or Spanish, and addressed the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of calcinosis in juvenile dermatomyositis. Systematic or scoping reviews, letters, clinical images, book chapters, abstracts, inflammatory myopathy in other connective tissue diseases, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies in adults, and purely qualitative studies were excluded.

RECENT FINDINGS

Seventy-five studies were included. According to the literature, calcinosis is common in women, around five years old, with three years of disease in association with osteoarticular, cutaneous, pulmonary manifestations, and fever. The pathogenesis is still unknown, but the participation of interleukin 1 and 6, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and innate immunity dysregulation seem to be involved. Common autoantibodies are anti-NXP-2, anti-MDA-5, and anti-Mi-2, and their treatment remains controversial. Prospective, randomized, controlled studies are needed to evaluate treatment protocols and map the natural history of this serious complication. Calcinosis seems to be more common in White female children with muscle weakness, fever, arthritis, severe pulmonary, and skin involvement with anti-NXP-2, anti-MDA-5, and anti-Mi-2 autoantibodies. The multitargets and aggressive treatment is recommended.

Biologic drugs in the treatment of juvenile dermatomyositis: a literature review

There is no clear consensus in the literature regarding the choice of biologic therapies and efficacy in juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM). In this review, we aimed to examine previous studies regarding biologic drug use in JDM patients. We screened MEDLINE and Scopus for articles involving JDM patients treated with biologic drugs. We identified 74 articles describing 495 JDM patients treated with biologic drugs (538 biologic treatments) during our literature search. The median (min-max) age of these patients was 9.8 (1-17) years (F/M:1.8). The most frequently used biologic drugs were rituximab (RTX, 50%) and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors (34.8%). In a few cases, abatacept (4.3%), anti-interleukin-1 agents (0.9%), tocilizumab (0.9%), bortezomib (0.4%), ustekinumab (0.2%), eculizumab (0.2%), and golimumab (0.2%) were used. RTX was most frequently preferred in patients with severe skin involvement (46.3%). Improvement with RTX was obtained in 60.1% of RTX treatments. Infliximab was most frequently preferred in calcinosis (43.3%), while adalimumab in skin involvement (50%) and etanercept in resistant/recurrent diseases (80%). Improvement was achieved in 44.4% of anti-TNF treatments. Adverse events were observed in 46.8% (58/124) of all treatments. Our results suggest that biologic agents may be a promising alternative for the treatment of particularly resistant JDM cases. Controlled studies are required to provide higher level of evidence for the timing of biologic use in JDM treatment. Key Points • There is no consensus on the choice and efficacy of biologic therapies in JDM. • RTX and TNF inhibitors are the most commonly used biologic drugs. • Biologics were especially preferred in severe skin involvement, calcinosis, and resistant diseases.