Neurophysiological monitoring of spinal cord function during instrumented anterior cervical fusion

The application value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in cervical spinal canal stenosis decompression surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Although intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been widely recognized and used in spine surgery, its characteristics vary for different types of spinal disorders, necessitating the development of tailored monitoring strategies. Cervical spinal stenosis presents complex clinical symptoms and carries significant surgical risks, creating a critical need to clarify the monitoring features, alert patterns, and their relationship with outcomes in such surgeries. A comprehensive assessment and the development of a refined IONM monitoring plan throughout the perioperative period is an important direction for future research.

PURPOSE

This study aims to investigate the influencing factors of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) alarm events in patients with cervical spinal canal stenosis and to evaluate the predictive value of different IONM alarm patterns on neurological recovery following decompression surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLES

This analysis included 1,622 patients who underwent cervical spinal canal decompression surgery and had complete IONM monitoring data between February 2017 and December 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The preoperative and postoperative neurological status of the patients was assessed using the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score. The primary IONM alarm indicators included somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) and transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP), compared to the preoperative baseline.

METHODS

Logistic regression was employed to analyze the correlation between preoperative diagnostic risk factors and intraoperative alarm events. Additionally, a multifactorial interaction analysis was performed to determine the relationship between IONM changes and the reversibility of alarms with the six-month mJOA recovery rate.

RESULTS

Preoperative diagnoses of the ligamentum flavum hypertrophy and/or ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, combined with an mJOA score <12, were identified as high-risk factors for intraoperative alarms. The sensitivity of alarms in the high-risk group was 100%, with a positive predictive value of 90.6%; in the low-risk group, the sensitivity was 91.7%, with a positive predictive value of 40.74%. Variance analysis indicated that the mJOA improvement rate at six months was significantly lower in patients with irreversible IONM alarms compared to those with reversible alarms. Interaction analysis suggested that the reversibility of intraoperative alarm events was a principal predictor of postoperative outcomes, while risk factors for alarms had predictive value only in patients with irreversible alarms.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cervical spinal canal stenosis caused by disc degeneration, the presence of ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, and preoperative mJOA scores <12 are significant high-risk factors for intraoperative alarms. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of intraoperative alarms in the high-risk group were significantly higher than those in the low-risk group. Moreover, patients with irreversible alarms exhibited poorer prognoses compared to those with reversible alarms, and preoperative alarm risk factors should not be considered independent predictors of patient outcomes.

Next-Generation Neuromonitoring in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Indications, Techniques, and Clinical Outcomes

Neuromonitoring in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) provides real-time feedback to surgeons and enhances surgical precision for improved patient safety. Since the 1970s, established techniques like somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, and electromyography have been integrated into spine surgeries, significantly reducing the risk of neurological complications. These neuromonitoring modalities have been crucial, particularly in complex procedures with limited direct visualization. Refinements in these techniques have led to greater confidence in nerve root safety, contributing to the success of MISS. Despite some debate regarding the routine use of neuromonitoring in noncomplex surgeries, its importance in complex cases is well-documented. Studies have demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity rates for these techniques, with multimodal approaches offering the best outcomes. Advancements in mechanomyography and its potential integration into neuromonitoring protocols highlight the continuous improvement in this field. This review explores the historical development, current techniques, clinical outcomes, and future directions of neuromonitoring in MISS. It emphasizes the critical role of these technologies in enhancing surgical outcomes and patient care. As MISS continues to evolve, adopting next-generation neuromonitoring systems, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, will play a pivotal role in advancing the efficacy and safety of spine surgeries.

Intraoperative somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) monitoring: an updated position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are used to assess the functional status of somatosensory pathways during surgical procedures and can help protect patients' neurological integrity intraoperatively. This is a position statement on intraoperative SEP monitoring from the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring (ASNM) and updates prior ASNM position statements on SEPs from the years 2005 and 2010. This position statement is endorsed by ASNM and serves as an educational service to the neurophysiological community on the recommended use of SEPs as a neurophysiological monitoring tool. It presents the rationale for SEP utilization and its clinical applications. It also covers the relevant anatomy, technical methodology for setup and signal acquisition, signal interpretation, anesthesia and physiological considerations, and documentation and credentialing requirements to optimize SEP monitoring to aid in protecting the nervous system during surgery.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring in Syringomyelia Surgery: A Multimodal Approach

Syringomyelia can be associated with multiple etiologies. The treatment of the underlying causes is first-line therapy; however, a direct approach to the syrinx is accepted as rescue treatment. Any direct intervention on the syrinx requires a myelotomy, posing a significant risk of iatrogenic spinal cord (SC) injury. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is crucial to detect and prevent surgically induced damage in neural SC pathways. We retrospectively reviewed the perioperative and intraoperative neurophysiological data and perioperative neurological examinations in ten cases of syringomyelia surgery. All the monitored modalities remained stable throughout the surgery in six cases, correlating with no new postoperative neurological deficits. In two patients, significant transitory attenuation, or loss of motor evoked potentials (MEPs), were observed and recovered after a corrective surgical maneuver, with no new postoperative deficits. In two cases, a significant MEP decrement was noted, which lasted until the end of the surgery and was associated with postoperative weakness. A transitory train of neurotonic electromyography (EMG) discharges was reported in one case. The surgical plan was adjusted, and the patient showed no postoperative deficits. The dorsal nerve roots were stimulated and identified in the seven cases where the myelotomy was performed via the dorsal root entry zone. Dorsal column mapping guided the myelotomy entry zone in four of the cases. In conclusion, multimodal IONM is feasible and reliable and may help prevent iatrogenic SC injury during syringomyelia surgery.

The Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Cervical Spine Surgery: Indications, Challenges, and Advances

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) has become an indispensable surgical adjunct in cervical spine procedures to minimize surgical complications. Understanding the historical development of IONM, indications for use, associated pitfalls, and recent developments will allow the surgeon to better utilize this important technology. While IONM has shown great promise in procedures for cervical deformity, intradural tumors, or myelopathy, routine use in all cervical spine cases with moderate pathology remains controversial. Pitfalls that need to be addressed include human error, a lack of efficient communication, variable alarm warning criteria, and a non-standardized checklist protocol. As the techniques associated with IONM technology become more robust moving forward, IONM emerges as a crucial solution to updating patient safety protocols.

Comparison of intraoperative neuromonitoring accuracies and procedures associated with alarms in anterior versus posterior fusion for cervical spinal disorders: A prospective multi-institutional cohort study

A prospective multicenter cohort study. To clarify the differences in the accuracy of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcE-MEPs) and procedures associated with the alarms between cervical anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Neurological complications after TcE-MEP alarms have been prevented by appropriate interventions for cervical degenerative disorders. The differences in the accuracy of TcE-MEPs and the timing of alarms between cervical ASF and PSF noted in the existing literature remain unclear. Patients (n = 415) who underwent cervical ASF (n = 171) or PSF (n = 244) at multiple institutions for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, spinal injury, and others were analyzed. Neurological complications, TcE-MEP alarms defined as a decreased amplitude of ≤70% compared to the control waveform, interventions after alarms, and TcE-MEP results were compared between the 2 surgeries. The incidence of neurological complications was 1.2% in the ASF group and 2.0% in the PSF group, with no significant intergroup differences (P-value was .493). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and rate of rescue were 50.0%, 95.2%, 99.4%, and 1.8%, respectively, in the ASF group, and 80.0%, 90.9%, 99.5%, and 2.9%, respectively, in the PSF group. The accuracy of TcE-MEPs was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P-value was .427 in sensitivity, .109 in specificity, and .674 in negative predictive value). The procedures associated with the alarms were decompression in 3 cases and distraction in 1 patient in the ASF group. The PSF group showed Tc-MEPs decreased during decompression, mounting rods, turning positions, and others. Most alarms went off during decompression in ASF, whereas various stages of the surgical procedures were associated with the alarms in PSF. There were no significant differences in the accuracy of TcE-MEPs between the 2 surgeries.

Postoperative Focal Lower Extremity Supplementary Motor Area Syndrome: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Supplementary motor area (SMA) syndrome refers to varying degrees of transient hemiparesis and mutism following insult to the medial posterior frontal lobe. We describe a rare case of an isolated lower limb SMA deficit with associated pre- and post-operative multimodality neurophysiological monitoring data. We review the literature on SMA somatotopy and the prognostic abilities of intraoperative motor evoked potentials in suspected SMA dysfunction. A 45-year-old male underwent staged resection of a complex parasagittal WHO grade II meningioma involving the posterior superior frontal gyrus bilaterally. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring with transcranial motor evoked potentials (TCMEP) and direct cortical motor evoked potentials (DCMEP) were used during both stages of resection. The patient developed an isolated left foot drop despite unchanged DCMEP and TCMEP data obtained during the first stage of the procedure. During the second stage of resection 3 days later, repeat neurophysiological monitoring confirmed intact corticospinal tracts. Deep peroneal somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) revealed good morphology, appropriate latency and amplitudes during the second stage of resection. These results suggested a diagnosis of focal SMA dysfunction. Left foot drop persisted 7 days post-operatively. At one month follow up, the patient was neurologically intact with full strength noted in all muscle groups of the left lower extremity. An improved understanding of the somatotopic organization of the SMA with additional neuromonitoring data can allow neurosurgeons to better predict and understand perioperative SMA dysfunctions.

Hand or foot train-of-four tests and surgical site muscle relaxation assessed with multiple motor evoked potentials: A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Intra-operative muscle relaxation is often required in orthopaedic surgery and the hand train-of-four (TOF) test is usually used for its quantification. However, even though full muscle relaxation is claimed by anaesthesiologists based on a TOF count of zero, surgeons observe residual muscle activity.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to assess if hand or foot TOF adequately represents intra-operative muscle relaxation compared with multiple motor evoked potentials.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

A single-centre study performed between February 2016 and December 2018 at the Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland.

PATIENTS

Twenty patients scheduled for elective lumbar spinal fusion were prospectively enrolled in this study after giving written informed consent.

INTERVENTIONS

To assess neuromuscular blockade (NMB) with the intermediate duration nondepolarising neuromuscular blocking agent rocuronium, hand TOF (adductor pollicis) and foot TOF (flexor hallucis brevis) monitoring, and muscle motor evoked potentials (MMEPs) from the upper and lower extremities were assessed prior to surgery under general anaesthesia. Following baseline measurements, muscle relaxation was performed with rocuronium until the spinal surgeon observed sufficient relaxation for surgical intervention. At this timepoint, NMB was assessed by TOF and MMEP.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was to determine the different effect of rocuronium on muscle relaxation comparing hand and foot TOF with the paraspinal musculature assessed by MMEP.

RESULTS

Hand TOF was more resistant to NMB and had a shorter recovery time than foot TOF. When comparing MMEPs, muscle relaxation occurred first in the hip abductors, and the paraspinal and deltoid muscles. The most resistant muscle to NMB was the abductor digiti minimi. Direct comparison showed that repetitive MMEPs simultaneously recorded from various muscles at the upper and lower extremities and from paraspinal muscles reflect muscle relaxation similar to TOF testing.

CONCLUSION

Hand TOF is superior to foot TOF in assessing muscle relaxation during spinal surgery. Hand TOF adequately represents the degree of muscle relaxation not only for the paraspinal muscles but also for all orthopaedic surgical sites where NMB is crucial for good surgical conditions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03318718).

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring Use Patterns in Degenerative, Nondeformity Cervical Spine Surgery: A Survey of the Cervical Spine Research Society

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the neuromonitoring (NM) usage patterns among cervical spine surgeons when performing degenerative, nondeformity cervical spine surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intraoperative NM is frequently used in spine surgery. Although there is literature to support the use of NM in deformity surgery, its utility in degenerative cervical spine surgery remains unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey was distributed to members of the Cervical Spine Research Society to assess practice patterns of NM use during degenerative cervical spine surgery. The survey consisted of 17 multiple choice questions. The first 3 questions focus on practice experience. The remaining 14 questions pertain to NM practice patterns in the setting of radiculopathy and myelopathy.

RESULTS

Significantly more surgeons routinely (>75% of the time) used NM for myelopathy versus radiculopathy (64% vs. 38%, P<0.001). Private practitioners were overall more likely to use NM than academicians (55% vs. 28%, P=0.007 for radiculopathy; 75% vs. 57%, P=0.09 for myelopathy). No significant difference in NM usage was found comparing neurosurgeons and orthopedic spine surgeons. The most commonly cited primary reasons for NM usage were prevention of positioning/hypotension-related neurological complications, and medicolegal protection.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine NM use during degenerative cervical surgery is significantly more common in myelopathy and is thought to be of more value than in radiculopathy. However, the most common reasons for usage were to provide medicolegal cover and to mitigate neurological complications related to positioning/hypotension, rather than to protect against direct surgical events. These findings contrast the prevailing notion that NM is beneficial in reducing complications related to events occurring in the surgical site when performing spinal deformity correction. We believe that these data provide an important baseline for informing best practice guidelines and further study regarding appropriate NM use for degenerative, nondeformity, cervical spine surgery.

Neurophysiological monitoring during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in anterior cervical spine discectomy with fusion (ACDF) for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

METHODS

Patients who underwent multimodal IONM (transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials [tcMEP], somatosensory-evoked potentials, and continuous electromyography) for ACDF from 2009 to 2019 were compared to historical controls from 2003 to 2009. The rates of postoperative neurological deficits, neurophysiological warnings, and their characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 196 patients, postoperative neurological deficit rates were 3.79% and 14.06% in the IONM and historical control (non-IONM) groups, respectively (p < 0.05). The use of IONM (OR: 0.139, p = 0.003) and presence of myelopathy (OR: 8.240, p = 0.013) were associated with postoperative neurological complications on multivariate regression. In total, 23 warnings were observed during IONM (17 tcMEP and/or electromyography; six electromyography). Sensitivity and specificity of IONM warnings for detecting neurological complications were 84.2% and 93.7%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

IONM, especially multimodal IONM, may be a useful tool to detect neurological damage in ACDF for high-risk conditions such as OPLL with pre-existing myelopathy.

SIGNIFICANCE

The utility of IONM in ACDF for OPLL has not been evaluated due to its rarity. This study supports the use of IONM in cervical OPLL with myelopathy.

Successful Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring in Cervical Myelopathy : Related Factors and the Effect of Increased Stimulation Intensity

Objective

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been widely used during spine surgery to reduce or prevent neurologic deficits, however, its application to the surgical management for cervical myelopathy remains controversial. This study aimed to assess the success rate of IONM in patients with cervical myelopathy and to investigate the factors associated with successful baseline monitoring and the effect of increasing the stimulation intensity by focusing on motor evoked potentials (MEPs).

Methods

The data of 88 patients who underwent surgery for cervical myelopathy with IONM between January 2016 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The success rate of baseline MEP monitoring at the initial stimulation of 400 V was investigated. In unmonitorable cases, the stimulation intensity was increased to 999 V, and the success rate final MEP monitoring was reinvestigated. In addition, factors related to the success rate of baseline MEP monitoring were investigated using independent t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, chi-squared test, and Fisher’s exact probability test for statistical analysis. The factors included age, sex, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, smoking history, symptom duration, Torg-Pavlov ratio, space available for the cord (SAC), cord compression ratio (CCR), intramedullary increased signal intensity (SI) on magnetic resonance imaging, SI length, SI ratio, the Medical Research Council (MRC) grade, the preoperative modified Nurick grade and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score.

Results

The overall success rate for reliable MEP response was 52.3% after increasing the stimulation intensity. No complications were observed to be associated with increased intensity. The factors related to the success rate of final MEP monitoring were found to be SAC (p<0.001), CCR (p<0.001), MRC grade (p<0.001), preoperative modified Nurick grade (p<0.001), and JOA score (p<0.001). The cut-off score for successful MEP monitoring was 5.67 mm for SAC, 47.33% for the CCR, 3 points for MRC grade, 2 points for the modified Nurick grade, and 12 points for the JOA score.

Conclusion

Increasing the stimulation intensity could significantly improve the success rate of baseline MEP monitoring for unmonitorable cases at the initial stimulation in cervical myelopathy. In particular, the SAC, CCR, MRC grade, preoperative Nurick grade and JOA score may be considered as the more important related factors associated with the success rate of MEP monitoring. Therefore, the degree of preoperative neurological functional deficits and the presence of spinal cord compression on imaging could be used as new detailed criteria for the application of IONM in patients with cervical myelopathy.

Therapeutic Impact of Traction Release After C5 Nerve Root Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) Alerts in Cervical Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of 40,919 cervical spine surgeries monitored with motor evoked potentials (MEPs) from a multi-institutional intraoperative neuromonitoring database.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the clinical impact of interventions prompted by C5 spinal nerve root MEP alerts.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MEPs have been shown to diagnose acute C5 palsies, but additional data are needed regarding the clinical impact of interventions in response to C5 MEP alerts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Procedures with isolated C5 MEP alerts were categorized as fully resolved, partially resolved, or unresolved based on the status of signals at closure. Clinical outcomes were based on neurological assessment in the immediate postoperative period. The sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and odds ratios (ORs) of C5 MEP alerts for acute C5 palsies were calculated.

RESULTS

The odds of an acute C5 palsy greatly increased if there was a C5 MEP alert [OR=340.9; 95% confidence (CI): 173.0, 671.6; P<0.0001], and increased further if the alert persisted through closure (OR=820.8; 95% CI: 398.1, 1692.0; P<0.0001). Relative to procedures with unresolved C5 MEP alerts, the risk of an acute C5 palsy significantly decreased if a C5 MEP alert was fully resolved by closure (OR=0.07; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.25; P<0.0001). For alerts resolved during positioning or exposure, 90.9% were resolved with the release of positional traction, and for resolved alerts that occurred after exposure, 36.3% involved just traction release, 14.1% involved both traction release and surgical action, and 30.3% involved just surgical action. The sensitivity of C5 MEP alerts for acute C5 palsies was anesthetic dependent: 89.7% (26/29) in the total intravenous regimen cohort but just 50.0% (10/20) in the inhalational anesthesia cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

The timely release of positional traction is an effective intervention for resolving C5 MEP alerts and reducing the odds of an acute postoperative C5 palsy. Surgical maneuvers, such as the release of distraction or graft adjustment, should be attempted in conjunction with traction release depending on the surgical context of the alert.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

The efficacy of somatosensory evoked potentials in evaluating new neurological deficits after spinal thoracic fusion and decompression

OBJECTIVE

Posterior thoracic fusion (PTF) is used as a surgical treatment for a wide range of pathologies. The monitoring of somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) is used to detect and prevent injury during many neurological surgeries. The authors conducted a study to evaluate the efficacy of SSEPs in predicting perioperative lower-extremity (LE) neurological deficits during spinal thoracic fusion surgery.

METHODS

The authors included patients who underwent PTF with SSEP monitoring performed throughout the entire surgery from 2010 to 2015 at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC). The sensitivity, specificity, odds ratio, and receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of SSEP changes in predicting postoperative deficits. Univariate analysis was completed to determine the impact of age exceeding 65 years, sex, obesity, abnormal baseline testing, surgery type, and neurological deficits on the development of intraoperative changes.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2015, 771 eligible patients underwent SSEP monitoring during PTF at UPMC. Univariate and linear regression analyses showed that LE SSEP changes significantly predicted LE neurological deficits. Significant changes in LE SSEPs had a sensitivity and specificity of 19% and 96%, respectively, in predicting LE neurological deficits. The diagnostic odds ratio for patients with new LE neurological deficits who had significant changes in LE SSEPs was 5.86 (95% CI 2.74-12.5). However, the results showed that a loss of LE waveforms had a poor predictive value for perioperative LE deficits (diagnostic OR 1.58 [95% CI 0.19-12.83]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with new postoperative LE neurological deficits are 5.9 times more likely to have significant changes in LE SSEPs during PTF. Surgeon awareness of an LE SSEP loss may alter surgical strategy and positively impact rates of postoperative LE neurological deficit status. The relatively poor sensitivity of LE SSEP monitoring may indicate a need for multimodal neurophysiological monitoring, including motor evoked potentials, in thoracic fusion surgery.

Intraoperative monitoring of corticospinal tracts in anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery: Excitability differentials of lower extremity muscles

•

Lower extremity (LE) muscles demonstrate intraoperative excitability differences.

•

Abductor hallucis is a suitable LE muscle for monitoring the corticospinal tract (CST).

•

CST monitoring with two LE muscles includes advantages but also practical limitations.

Objective

This study examines and compares excitability characteristics of tibialis anterior (TA) and abductor hallucis (AH) transcranial motor evoked potentials (tcMEP) during anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) surgery.

Methods

Electrophysiological and clinical data of 89 patients who underwent ACDF procedure were retrospectively reviewed. TcMEP data of TA and AH muscles from 178 limbs were analyzed for availability, robustness and stability during the procedure.

Results

TA tcMEP was available at 83% whereas AH tcMEP was available at 99% of the monitored lower limbs at preposition baseline. Availability of both TA and AH tcMEP was demonstrated in 147/178 limbs. The baseline amplitude of AH tcMEP was significantly greater than that of TA tcMEP recorded from the same limb (744.6 ± 54.0 and 326.9 ± 33.3 µV, respectively). Simultaneous deterioration of TA and AH tcMEP data was demonstrated in 10/147 limbs. Deterioration of either TA or AH tcMEP data accompanied by unchanged tcMEP data from the other lower limb muscle was noted in 32/147 compared to 1/147 limbs, respectively. The deteriorated TA and AH tcMEP data returned to baseline before closing at incidence of 17% compared to 46%, respectively. No new lower extremity (LE) neurological deficit was presented postoperatively in any patient.

Conclusions

AH tcMEP is a more reliable candidate than TA tcMEP for intraoperative LE monitoring in ACDF procedure.

Significance

The excitability differentials in LE tcMEP in ACDF is a variable that need to be considered while interpreting intraoperative neurophysiological data.

Irreversible Hypoglossal Nerve Injury and Concomitant Trigeminal System Dysfunction After Anterior Surgery to the Cervical Spine: Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The anterior surgical approach to the cervical spine is known to be safe, and damage to the hypoglossal nerve and trigeminal pathway after the surgery is uncommon. However, once damage to those nerves occurs, the patient's quality of life can be severely impaired by discomfort and disability.

CASE DESCRIPTION

We report the case of a 59-year-old male with concomitant and irreversible hypoglossal nerve and trigeminal system dysfunction after cervical spine surgery by the anterior approach confirmed by an electrodiagnostic study. He had undergone anterior cervical disc fusion through right-sided approach for a herniated intervertebral disc on the C3-4 level and direct cord compression. He had difficulty with tongue movement, dysarthria, and hypesthesia along the lower margin of the right mandible immediately after the surgery. An electrodiagnostic study revealed hypoglossal neuropathy and trigeminal somatosensory pathway dysfunction. Even though the patient received rehabilitation therapy for impaired tongue movement for more than 2 years, this function did not recover.

CONCLUSIONS

It is important to be aware of the complexity of the anatomy of vulnerable structures, including hypoglossal nerves and the trigeminal nerve system at the cervical spine level, to prevent damage to important neural structures during surgical procedures.

Indication and technical implementation of the intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgeries-a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is widely used in spine surgery (sIONM). But guidelines are lacking and its use is mainly driven by individual surgeons' preferences and medicolegal advisements. To gain an overview over the current status of sIONM implementation, we conducted a transnational survey in the German-speaking countries.

METHODS

We developed a Web interface-based survey assessing prevalence, indication, technical implementation, and general satisfaction regarding sIONM in German, Austrian, and Swiss spine centers. The electronic survey was performed between November 2017 and April 2018, including both neurosurgical and orthopedic spine centers.

RESULTS

A total of 463 German, 60 Austrian, and 52 Swiss spine centers were contacted with participation rates of 64.1% (Germany), 68.3% (Austria), and 55.8% (Switzerland). Some 75.9% participating neurosurgical spine centers and only 14.7% of the orthopedic spine centers applied sIONM. Motor- and somatosensory-evoked potentials (93.7% and 94.3%, respectively) were the most widely available modalities, followed by direct wave (D wave; 66.5%). Whereas sIONM utilization was low in spine surgeries for degenerative, traumatic, and extradural tumor diseases, it was high for scoliosis and intradural tumor surgeries. Overall, the general satisfaction within the institutional setting regarding technical skills, staff, performance, and reliability of sIONM was rated as "high" by more than three-quarters of the centers. However, shortage of skilled staff was claimed to be a negative factor by 41.1% of the centers and reimbursement was considered to be insufficient by 83.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

sIONM availability was high in neurosurgical but low in orthopedic spine centers. Main modalities were motor/somatosensory-evoked potentials and main indications were scoliosis and intradural spinal tumor surgeries. A more frequent sIONM use, however, was mainly limited by the shortage of skilled staff and restricted reimbursement.

Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Associated With Neck Flexion in Posterior Cervical Decompression

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of 179 consecutive patients who underwent intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during posterior cervical spine surgery for compression myelopathy.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate preoperative factors in patients with deteriorating spinal cord function due to flexion of the neck during posterior cervical spine surgery by observing changes in waveforms on intraoperative monitoring.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

We encountered several cases of intraoperative monitoring warning alerts because of neck flexion during posterior cervical spine surgery. We investigated the incidence rate and intraoperative predictors of deteriorating spinal cord function caused by neck flexion based on waveform changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Subjects were 179 patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression for spinal cord compression. When warning alarms were set off by amplitude changes in the period between skin incision and exposure of the lamina, the neck position was changed from flexion to neutral, and patients whose electrical potentials recovered following cervical repositioning were placed in the flexion-induced potential reduction group. We then analyzed and extracted risk factors for flexion-induced reduction in electrical potentials.

RESULTS

In total, 156 patients were analyzed in this study. Monitoring alarms went off intraoperatively for 7 patients (4.5%) at the time of posterior cervical spine exposure. With regard to the most compressed level, the occupancy ratio of the anterior compression component, the kyphotic angle in flexion, and range of motion in the neutral position to flexion were significantly associated with flexion-induced reduction in electrical potentials. Furthermore, logistic regression analysis extracted the occupancy ratio of the anterior compression component at the most compressed level and the kyphotic angle of the most compressed level in flexion.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a large anterior compression component and large kyphotic angle in neck flexion at the most compressed level are risk factors for intraoperative spinal cord injury during posterior cervical spine surgery.

Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring for Craniovertebral Junction Surgery

Craniovertebral junction (CVJ) surgery encompasses a wide spectrum of neurosurgical procedures ranging from transoral approaches for CVJ bone anomalies to surgery for intramedullary tumours. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has been increasingly used in recent years because of its ability to prevent neurological complications during surgery. In CVJ surgery the risk of neurological injuries is related first to the positioning of the patient and then to the surgical procedure. Application of IONM during the positioning of the patient permits fast recognition of impending causes of neurological injury. During surgery, continuous IONM permits real-time assessment of the functional integrity of the spinal tracts and provides useful feedback during surgical manoeuvres. The applications of IONM are mainly related to intradural procedures, but wider application of these techniques during surgery for CVJ instability and degenerative disorders has recently been described, leading also to better understanding of the pathophysiology of spinal cord injuries. In this paper we review and discuss the principal IONM techniques used during surgery around the CVJ.

Warning criteria for intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Intraoperative changes in somatosensory (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) may indicate potential injury to the spinal cord and will require timely intervention to prevent permanent damage. This review focuses on the validity of currently recommended warning criteria for intraoperative evoked potential monitoring.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current guideline recommends a decrease in SEP amplitude by 50% and MEP amplitude by 50-100% as warning signals for injury to the ascending sensory and descending motor pathway, respectively. On the basis of cohort studies, the diagnostic accuracy of SEP and MEP to predict postoperative neurologic deficits was variable. Importantly, 0.1-4.1% of monitored patients suffered postoperative neurologic deficit despite apparently normal SEP and MEP recordings (i.e. false negative events). These data suggested that the true warning criteria may be lower than previously acknowledged. A systematic review of studies that reported changes in SEP or MEP monitoring and postoperative neurological outcome showed an association between changes in monitoring signals and postoperative neurological deficits. However, the confidence intervals were wide and it is not possible to determine a threshold value in SEP or MEP amplitude beyond which may indicate neurologic deficit.

SUMMARY

Current recommendations for warning criteria during intraoperative evoked potential monitoring are empirically derived. Until a threshold that predicts spinal cord injury can be accurately determined, it remains difficult to define the clinical utility of intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring.

Intraoperative Neurophysiologic Monitoring for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring is a reliable tool for detecting intraoperative spine injury and is recommended during surgery for degenerative cervical myopathy (DCM). Somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) can be used to monitor spine and peripheral nerve injury during positioning in surgery for DCM. Compensation technique for transcranial evoked muscle action potentials (tcMEPs) should be adopted in intraoperative monitoring during surgery for DCM. Free-running electromyography is a useful real-time monitoring add-on modality in addition to SEP and tcMEP.

Intraoperative motor evoked potential monitoring to patients with preoperative spinal deficits: judging its feasibility and analyzing the significance of rapid signal loss

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Transcranial motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring has been widely adopted in spine surgery, but so far the useful monitoring data for patients with preoperative spinal deficits (PPSDs) are limited. Originally we thought that they seemed technically more difficult and less reliable in performing the MEP monitoring to PPSDs.

PURPOSE

Our objective was to study (1) the feasibility of MEP monitoring in PPSDs and the (2) the significance of rapid MEP loss.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective case notes study from a prospective patient register was used as the study design.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 332 PPSDs who underwent posterior spine surgery with a reliable MEP monitoring were collected between September 2010 and December 2014.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Relevant MEP loss was identified as rapid amplitude reduction (more than 80% MEP) associated with high-risk surgical maneuvers or high-risk diagnoses.

METHOD

The muscles with higher strength were used to record the optimal MEP signal. MEP monitoring of these patients was considered to be feasible if reproducible signals had been obtained; moreover, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were computed. The significance of the patients with rapid MEP loss was analyzed.

RESULTS

From a total of 332 PPSDs, 27 cases showed significant MEP loss (23 true positive, 4 false positive), and 21 showed new spinal deficits. Invalid MEP baselines were found in 11 paralysis and 6 severely incomplete paraplegia patients, and success rate of reliable MEP was 95.1% in PPSDs. The congenital kyphoscoliosis, tuberculous kyphoscoliosis, and thoracic spinal stenosis are considered high-risk diagnoses to result in MEP loss. The sensitivity of intraoperative MEP monitoring was 100%, the specificity 98.7%, the positive predictive value 85.2%, and the negative predictive value 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative MEP monitoring is feasible for most of the PPSDs. The rapid MEP loss during high-risk diagnoses and complicated surgical procedures may indicate new spinal deficits.

Retrospective Waveform Analysis of Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP) to Identify Early Predictors of Impending Motor Deficits in Spinal Surgeries

PURPOSE

Although there are guidelines analyzing transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEP) waveform criteria, they vary widely and are not applied universally during intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM). The objective is to generate hypotheses to identify early and reliable MEP waveform characteristics prior to complete loss of MEP to predict impending motor spinal cord injuries during spinal surgeries. The ultimate goal is to enhance real-time feedback to prevent injury or detect reversible spinal cord damage.

METHODS

Fifteen true positive cases of persistent intraoperative MEP loss and new postoperative motor deficits were retrospectively identified from 2011 to 2013. Waveform characteristics of latency, amplitude, duration, phases, and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were measured, and an intraoperative spinal cord index (ISCI) was calculated for 5 traces prior to complete MEP loss. ISCI = [amplitude x duration x (phases+1) x AUC]/latency.

RESULTS

Out of 22 muscles in 15 cases, latency increased in 2, duration decreased in 12, amplitude decreased in 13, AUC decreased in 13, and ISCI decreased in 14. In 11 out of 15 cases (73%), ISCI dropped > 40% in at least one muscle before MEP were completely lost. Thirteen cases had concurrent somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP) changes, 9 out of 13 had > 50% decrease in SSEP: 2 out of 9 changed before MEP, 5 out of 9 simultaneously, and 2 out of 9 after.

CONCLUSIONS

In these cases of motor injury, smaller and simpler MEP waveforms preceded complete loss of signal. An ISCI 40% drop could be tested as a warning threshold for impending motor compromise in future prospective studies and lead to eventual standardization to predict irreversible postoperative deficits.

Intraoperative Neuromonitoring for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: What Is the Evidence?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to (i) assess the risk of neurological injury after anterior cervical spine surgery (ACSS) with and without intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) and (ii) evaluate differences in the sensitivity and specificity of ION for ACSS.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although ION is used to detect impending neurological injuries in deformity surgery, it's utility in ACSS remains controversial.

METHODS

A systematic search of multiple medical reference databases was conducted for studies on ION use for ACSS. Studies that included posterior cervical surgery were excluded. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model for heterogeneity. Outcome measure was postoperative neurological injury.

RESULTS

The search yielded 10 studies totaling 26,357 patients. The weighted risk of neurological injury after ACSS was 0.64% (0.23-1.25). The weighted risk of neurological injury was 0.20% (0.05-0.47) for ACDFs compared with 1.02% (0.10-2.88) for corpectomies. For ACDFs, there was no difference in the risk of neurological injury with or without ION (odds ratio, 0.726; confidence interval, CI, 0.287-1.833; P = 0.498). The pooled sensitivities and specificities of ION for ACSS are 71% (CI: 48%-87%) and 98% (CI: 92%-100%), respectively. Unimodal ION has a higher specificity than multimodal ION [unimodal: 99% (CI: 97%-100%), multimodal: 92% (CI: 81%-96%), P = 0.0218]. There was no statistically significant difference in sensitivities between unimodal and multimodal [68% vs. 88%, respectively, P = 0.949].

CONCLUSION

The risk of neurological injury after ACSS is low although procedures involving a corpectomy may carry a higher risk. For ACDFs, there is no difference in the risk of neurological injury with or without ION use. Unimodal ION has a higher specificity than multimodal ION and may minimize "subclinical" intraoperative alerts in ACSS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Routine Use of Intraoperative Neuromonitoring During ACDFs for the Treatment of Spondylotic Myelopathy and Radiculopathy Is Questionable: A Review of 15,395 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective database study.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to (1) evaluate the trends in the use of intraoperative neuromonitoring (ION) for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in the United States and (2) assess the incidence of neurological injuries after ACDFs with and without ION.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) are the commonly used ION modalities for ACDFs. Controversy exists on the routine use of ION for ACDFs and there is limited literature on national practice patterns of its use.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed using the PearlDiver Patient Record Database to identify cases of spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy that underwent ACDF from 2007 to 2014. The type of ION modality used and the rates of neurological injury after surgery were assessed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 15,395 patients underwent an ACDF. Overall, ION was used in 2627 (17.1%) of these cases. There was a decrease in the use of ION for ACDFs from 22.8% in 2007 to 4.3% use in 2014 (P < 0.0001). The ION modalities used for these ACDFs were quite variable: SSEPs only (48.7%), MMEPs only (5.3%), and combined SSEPs and MMEPs (46.1%). Neurological injuries occurred in 0.23% and 0.27% of patients with and without ION, respectively (P = 0.84). Younger age was associated with a higher utility of ION (<45: 20.3%, 45-54: 19.3%, 55-64: 16.6%, 65-74: 14.3%, and >75: 13.6%, P < 0.0001). Significant regional variability was observed in the utility of ION for ACDFs across the country (West; 21.9%, Midwest; 12.9% (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

There has been a significant decrease in the use of ION for ACDFs. Furthermore, there was significant age and regional variability in the use of ION for ACDFs. Use of ION does not further prevent the rate of postoperative neurological complications for ACDFs as compared with the cases without ION. The utility of routine ION for ACDFs is questionable.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring to reduce neurological complications in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy

The primary aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review of reports of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy and to assess the value of intraoperative monitoring (IOM), including somatosensory evoked potentials, transcranial motor evoked potentials and electromyography, in anterior cervical procedures. A search was conducted to collect a small database of relevant papers using key words describing disorders and procedures of interest. The database was then shortlisted using selection criteria and data was extracted to identify complications as a result of anterior cervical procedures for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and outcome analysis on a continuous scale. In the 22 studies that matched the screening criteria, only two involved the use of IOM. The average sample size was 173 patients. In procedures done without IOM a mean change in Japanese Orthopaedic Association score of 3.94 points and Nurick score by 1.20 points (both less severe post-operatively) was observed. Within our sub-group analysis, worsening myelopathy and/or quadriplegia was seen in 2.71% of patients for studies without IOM and 0.91% of patients for studies with IOM. Variations persist in the existing literature in the evaluation of complications associated with anterior cervical spinal procedures. Based on the review of published studies, sufficient evidence does not exist to make recommendations regarding the use of different IOM modalities to reduce neurological complications during anterior cervical procedures. However, future studies with objective measures of neurological deficits using a specific IOM modality may establish it as an effective and reliable indicator of injury during such surgeries.

Electrical stimulation threshold in chronically compressed lumbar nerve roots: Observational study

OBJECTIVES

Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is a common practice in spinal surgery, mostly during pedicle screw placement. However, there is not enough information about the factors that can interfere with IONM data. One of these factors may be existing damage of the nerve root whose function must be preserved. The main purpose of the present study is to evaluate the effect of chronic compression in lumbar nerve roots in terms of stimulation thresholds during direct nerve stimulation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Direct electrical stimulation was performed in 201 lumbar nerve roots during lumbar spinal procedures under general anaesthesia in 80 patients with different lumbar spinal pathologies. Clinical and radiological data were reviewed in order to establish the presence of chronic compression.

RESULTS

Chronically compressed nerve roots showed a higher stimulation threshold than non compressed nerve roots (11.93 mA vs. 4.33 mA). This difference was confirmed with intra-subject comparison (paired sample t test, p=0.012). No other clinical factors were associated with this higher stimulation threshold in lumbar nerve roots.

CONCLUSION

A higher stimulation threshold is present in compressed lumbar nerve roots than non compressed roots. This needs to be taken into consideration during pedicle screw placement, where intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring is being used.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring in single-level spinal procedures: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis in a national longitudinal database

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective propensity score-matched analysis on a national database (MarketScan) between 2006 and 2010.

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of neurological deficits after elective single-level spinal procedures with and without intraoperative neuromonitoring, as well as associated payment differences and geographic variance.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring is a technique that may contribute to avoiding permanent neurological injury during some spine surgery procedures. However, it is unclear whether all patients undergoing spine surgery benefit from neuromonitoring.

METHODS

An identified 85,640 patients underwent single-level spinal procedures including anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), lumbar fusion, lumbar laminectomy, or lumbar discectomy. Neuromonitoring was identified with appropriate Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Cohorts were balanced on baseline comorbidities and procedure characteristics using propensity score matching. Trauma and spinal tumors cases were excluded.

RESULTS

Patients (12.66%) received neuromonitoring intraoperatively. Lumbar laminectomies had reduced 30-day neurological complication rate with neuromonitoring (0.0% vs. 1.18%, P=0.002). Neuromonitoring did not correlate with reduced intraoperative neurological complications in ACDFs (0.09% vs. 0.13%), lumbar fusions (0.32% vs. 0.58%), or lumbar discectomy (1.24% vs. 0.91%). With the addition of neuromonitoring, payments for ACDFs increased 16.24% ($3842), lumbar fusions 7.84% ($3540), lumbar laminectomies 24.33% ($3704), and lumbar discectomies 22.54% ($2859). Significant geographic variation was evident. Some states had no recorded single-level spinal cases with concurrent neuromonitoring. Rates for ACDFs and lumbar fusions, laminectomies, and discectomies ranged as high as 61%, 58%, 22%, and 21%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

With intraoperative neurological monitoring in single-level procedures, neurological complications were decreased only among lumbar laminectomies. No difference was observed in ACDFs, lumbar fusions, or lumbar discectomies. There was a significant increase in total payments associated with the index procedure and hospitalization. We demonstrate significant geographic variation in neuromonitoring.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Role of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during positioning of patient prior to cervical spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

To determine the use of multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during positioning procedures in cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

IONM data was collected from 75 patients from the onset of positioning to the end of the surgical procedure. These included: transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEP), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and free running electromyography (EMG) recordings. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (PNV) were calculated.

RESULTS

IONM warnings were given in 5 cases during neck positioning. These consisted of the disappearance of TcMEP in all the cases, while two cases showed a loss of SEPs as well. Four of these patients presented a complete recovery of TcMEP and SEPs after neck repositioning. The patient in which this recovery was not present, woke up with new postoperative neurological deficits. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of TcMEP during cervical positioning were all 100%. Sensitivity of SEPs was 40%; specificity and PPV were 100%; and the NPV of SEPs was 95.9%.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal IONM is a useful method to prevent spinal cord injury during neck positioning in cervical spine surgical procedures. TcMEPs showed the highest sensitivity in detecting injuries to cervical spine related to neck positioning.

SIGNIFICANCE

Multimodal IONM should not only be considered for detecting intra-operative warnings, but also during positioning.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring with MEPs and prediction of postoperative neurological deficits in patients undergoing surgery for cervical and cervicothoracic myelopathy

OBJECT

The use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) in surgical decompression surgery for myelopathy may assist the surgeon in taking corrective measures to reduce or prevent permanent neurological deficits. We evaluated the efficacy of IONM in cervical and cervicothoracic spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) cases.

METHODS

The authors retrospectively reviewed 140 cases involving patients who underwent surgery for CSM utilizing IONM during 2011 at the University of California, San Francisco. Data on preoperative clinical variables, intraoperative changes in transcranial motor evoked potentials (MEPs), and postoperative new neurological deficits were collected. Associations between categorical variables were analyzed with the Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

Of the 140 patients, 16 (11%) had significant intraoperative decreases in MEPs. In 8 of these cases, the MEP signal did not return to baseline values by the end of the operation. There were 8 (6%) postoperative deficits, of which 6 were C-5 palsies and 2 were paraparesis. Six of the patients with postoperative deficits had demonstrated persistent MEP signal change on IONM. There was a significant association between persistent MEP changes and postoperative deficits (p < 0.001). The sensitivity of intraoperative MEP monitoring was 75%, the specificity 98%, the positive predictive value 75%, and the negative predictive value 98%. Due to higher rates of false negatives, the sensitivity decreased to 60% in the subgroup of patients with vascular disease comorbidity. The sensitivity increased to 100% in elderly patients and in patients with preoperative motor deficits. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of deltoid and biceps MEP changes in predicting C-5 palsy were 67% and 67%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors found a correlation between decreased intraoperative MEPs and postoperative new neurological deficits in patients with CSM. Sensitivity varies based on patient comorbidities, age, and preoperative neurological function. Monitoring of MEPs is a useful adjunct for CSM cases, and the authors have developed a checklist to standardize their responses to intraoperative MEP changes.

Efficacy of intraoperative monitoring of transcranial electrical stimulation–induced motor evoked potentials and spontaneous electromyography activity to identify acute-versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root palsy during cervical spine surgery

Object

Deltoid muscle weakness due to C-5 nerve root injury following cervical spine surgery is an uncommon but potentially debilitating complication. Symptoms can manifest upon emergence from anesthesia or days to weeks following surgery. There is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of spontaneous electromyography (spEMG) monitoring in detecting evolving C-5 nerve root compromise. By contrast, transcranial electrical stimulation–induced motor evoked potential (tceMEP) monitoring has been shown to be highly sensitive and specific in identifying impending C-5 injury. In this study the authors sought to 1) determine the frequency of immediate versus delayed-onset C-5 nerve root injury following cervical spine surgery, 2) identify risk factors associated with the development of C-5 palsies, and 3) determine whether tceMEP and spEMG neuromonitoring can help to identify acutely evolving C-5 injury as well as predict delayed-onset deltoid muscle paresis.

Methods

The authors retrospectively reviewed the neuromonitoring and surgical records of all patients who had undergone cervical spine surgery involving the C-4 and/or C-5 level in the period from 2006 to 2008. Real-time tceMEP and spEMG monitoring from the deltoid muscle was performed as part of a multimodal neuromonitoring protocol during all surgeries. Charts were reviewed to identify patients who had experienced significant changes in tceMEPs and/or episodes of neurotonic spEMG activity during surgery, as well as those who had shown new-onset deltoid weakness either immediately upon emergence from the anesthesia or in a delayed fashion.

Results

Two hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing 235 cervical spine surgeries involving the C4–5 level served as the study cohort. The overall incidence of perioperative C-5 nerve root injury was 5.1%. The incidence was greatest (50%) in cases with dual corpectomies at the C-4 and C-5 spinal levels. All patients who emerged from anesthesia with deltoid weakness had significant and unresolved changes in tceMEPs during surgery, whereas only 1 had remarkable spEMG activity. Sensitivity and specificity of tceMEP monitoring for identifying acute-onset deltoid weakness were 100% and 99%, respectively. By contrast, sensitivity and specificity for spEMG were only 20% and 92%, respectively. Neither modality was effective in identifying patients who demonstrated delayed-onset deltoid weakness.

Conclusions

The risk of new-onset deltoid muscle weakness following cervical spine surgery is greatest for patients undergoing 2-level corpectomies involving C-4 and C-5. Transcranial electrical stimulation–induced MEP monitoring is a highly sensitive and specific technique for detecting C-5 radiculopathy that manifests immediately upon waking from anesthesia. While the absence of sustained spEMG activity does not rule out nerve root irritation, the presence of excessive neurotonic discharges serves both to alert the surgeon of such potentially injurious events and to prompt neuromonitoring personnel about the need for additional tceMEP testing. Delayed-onset C-5 nerve root injury cannot be predicted by intraoperative neuromonitoring via either modality.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during syringomyelia surgery: lessons from a series of 13 patients

BACKGROUND

Avoiding iatrogenic neurological injury during spinal cord surgery is crucially important. Intraoperative neurological monitoring (INM) has been widely used in a variety of spinal surgeries as a means of reducing the risk of intraoperative neurological insults. This study evaluates the benefits of INM specifically in spinal procedures for treatment of syringomyelia.

METHODS

Thirteen patients who underwent surgery for syrinx drainage with the assistance of INM were included in this study. In all patients both somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor-evoked potentials (MEP) were monitored. INM data and perioperative neurological evaluations were both recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven patients underwent syringo-subarachnoid shunt (SSAS) surgery. One patient underwent syrinx drainage and foramen magnum decompression (FMD). One patient underwent syringo-pleural shunt (SPA) surgery. Baseline MEP and SSEP were recordable at the beginning of surgery in 11 patients (>84 %). In the other two cases, baseline data from specific INM modalities were absent, correlating with the antecedent neurologic symptomotology. Two patients exhibited significant intraoperative changes in MEP data that influenced the course of surgery and prompted removal or re-insertion of the shunt. Mild and transient worsening of preoperative symptoms was reported in these instances. No new postoperative neurological deficits were reported in the other 11 patients in whom INM data were preserved throughout surgery.

CONCLUSION

These data support routine use of INM in syringomyelia surgery. INM can alert the surgeon to potential intraoperative threats to the functional integrity of the spinal cord, providing a useful adjunct to spinal cord surgeries for the treatment of syringomyelia.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in spine surgery: indications, efficacy, and role of the preoperative checklist

Spine surgery carries an inherent risk of damage to critical neural structures. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is frequently used to improve the safety of spine surgery by providing real-time assessment of neural structures at risk. Evidence-based guidelines for safe and efficacious use of IONM are lacking and its use is largely driven by surgeon preference and medicolegal issues. Due to this lack of standardization, the preoperative sign-in serves as a critical opportunity for 3-way discussion between the neurosurgeon, anesthesiologist, and neuromonitoring team regarding the necessity for and goals of IONM in the ensuing case. This analysis contains a review of commonly used IONM modalities including somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, spontaneous or free-running electromyography, triggered electromyography, and combined multimodal IONM. For each modality the methodology, interpretation, and reported sensitivity and specificity for neurological injury are addressed. This is followed by a discussion of important IONM-related issues to include in the preoperative checklist, including anesthetic protocol, warning criteria for possible neurological injury, and consideration of what steps to take in response to a positive alarm. The authors conclude with a cost-effectiveness analysis of IONM, and offer recommendations for IONM use during various forms of spine surgery, including both complex spine and minimally invasive procedures, as well as lower-risk spinal operations.

The usefulness of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in cervical spine surgery: a retrospective analysis of 200 consecutive patients

The usefulness of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM), including somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP) and transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials (TcMEPs) in cervical spine surgery still needs to be evaluated. We retrospectively reviewed 200 cervical spine surgery patients from 2008 to 2009 to determine the role of IONM in cervical spine surgery. Total intravenous anesthesia was used for all patients. IONM alerts were defined as a 50% decrease in amplitude, a 10% increase in latency, or a unilateral change for SSEP and an increase in stimulation threshold of more than 100 V for TcMEP. Three patients had SSEP alerts that were related to arm malposition (2 patients) and hypotension (1 patient). Five patients had TcMEP alerts: 4 alerts were caused by hypotension and 1 by bone graft compression of the spinal cord. All alerts were resolved when causative reasons were corrected. There was no postoperative iatrogenic neurological injury. The sensitivities of SSEP and TcMEP alerts for detecting impending neurological injury were 37.5% and 62.5%, respectively. The sensitivity of both SSEP and TcMEP used in combination was 100%. No false-positive and false-negative alerts were identified in either SSEP or TcMEP (100% specificity). The total intravenous anesthesia technique optimizes the detection of SSEP and TcMEP and therefore improves the sensitivity and specificity of IONM. SSEP is sensitive in detecting alerts in possible malposition-induced ischemia or brachial plexus nerve injury. TcMEP specifically detects hypotension-induced spinal functional compromises. Combination use of TcMEP and SSEP enhances the early detection of impeding neurological damage during cervical spine surgery.

Is It Real False Negative Finding in Motor Evoked Potential Monitoring during Corrective Surgery of Ankylosing Spondylitis? A Case Report

We performed L1 posterior vertebral columnar resection and posterior correction for Andersson's lesion and thoracolumbar kyphosis in an ankylosing spondylitis patient during motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring. We checked MEP intra-operatively, whenever a dangerous procedure for neural elements was performed, and no abnormal findings were seen during surgery. After the operation, we examined neurologic function in the recovery room; the patient showed a progressive neurologic deficit and no response to MEP. After emergency neural exploration and decompression surgery, the neurologic deficit was recovered. We questioned whether to acknowledge the results of this case as a false negative. We think the possible reason for this result may be delayed development of paralysis. So, we recommend that MEP monitoring should be performed not only after important operative steps but also after all steps, including skin suturing, for final confirmation.

Cervical decompression and reconstruction without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Object

The primary goal of this study was to review the immediate postoperative neurological function in patients surgically treated for symptomatic cervical spine disease without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. The secondary goal was to assess the economic impact of intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in this patient population.

Methods

This study is a retrospective review of 720 consecutively treated patients who underwent cervical spine procedures. The patients were identified and the data were collected by individuals who were not involved in their care.

Results

A total of 1534 cervical spine levels were treated in 720 patients using anterior, posterior, and combined (360°) approaches. Myelopathy was present preoperatively in 308 patients. There were 185 patients with increased signal intensity within the spinal cord on preoperative T2-weighted MR images, of whom 43 patients had no clinical evidence of myelopathy. Three patients (0.4%) exhibited a new neurological deficit postoperatively. Of these patients, 1 had a preoperative diagnosis of radiculopathy, while the other 2 were treated for myelopathy. The new postoperative deficits completely resolved in all 3 patients and did not require additional treatment. The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for IOM during cervical decompression include 95925 and 95926 for somatosensory evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities, respectively, as well as 95928 and 95929 for motor evoked potential monitoring of the upper and lower extremities. In addition to the charge for the baseline [monitoring] study, patients are charged hourly for ongoing electrophysiology testing and monitoring using the CPT code 95920. Based on these codes and assuming an average of 4 hours of monitoring time per surgical case, the savings realized in this group of patients was estimated to be $1,024,754.

Conclusions

With the continuing increase in health care costs, it is our responsibility as providers to minimize expenses when possible. This should be accomplished without compromising the quality of care to patients. This study demonstrates that decompression and reconstruction for symptomatic cervical spine disease without IOM may reduce the cost of treatment without adversely impacting patient safety.

Concomitant hypertension, bradycardia, and loss of transcranial electric motor evoked potentials during pedicle hook removal: report of a case

Neurophysiologic monitors in the form of transcranial electric motor evoked potentials (tceMEPs) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) have become widely used modalities to monitor spinal cord function during major orthopedic spine procedures. In combination with invasive and non-invasive clinical monitoring and an anesthesia information management system (AIMS), we promptly recognized an acute change in hemodynamic and neurophysiologic parameters, managed intraoperative spinal cord contusion, and successfully minimized iatrogenic injury to the spinal cord during corrective spine surgery.

Detection of postoperative neurologic deficits using somatosensory-evoked potentials alone during posterior cervical laminoplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The use of neurophysiologic monitoring during anterior and posterior cervical decompression procedures in patients with spondylotic myelopathy remains controversial. The ideal neurophysiologic monitoring modality of choice is also highly debated.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of neurophysiologic monitoring with only somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs) in a consecutive series of laminoplasty procedures with regard to the detection of new postoperative neurologic deficits.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Eighty consecutive patients who underwent a posterior cervical laminoplasty were reviewed.

OUTCOME MEASURES

We analyzed intraoperative SSEP amplitude and latency changes from baseline with regard to the development of new postoperative neurologic deficits.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 80 patients who underwent a posterior cervical "open-door" laminoplasty with a standard SSEP neurophysiologic monitoring protocol. Intraoperative SSEP amplitude and latency changes from baseline ("alerts") were analyzed with regard to the development of new postoperative neurologic deficits.

RESULTS

Baseline SSEP values were obtained in all patients. There were five (6%) procedures that had SSEP alerts. All alerts occurred shortly after the lamina was hinged open. Four patients with SSEP alerts developed new postoperative neurologic deficits, including three unilateral upper extremity motor and sensory deficits and one complete spinal cord injury. In the immediate postoperative period, our experience with SSEP monitoring demonstrated 4 true-positive, 75 true-negative, and 1 false-positive monitoring results.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of laminoplasty procedures, SSEP neurophysiologic monitoring had a high sensitivity and specificity for predicting new neurologic deficits in the early postoperative period. Somatosensory-evoked potentials are an effective tool for spinal cord monitoring when performing a posterior cervical laminoplasty procedure.

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Osteoblasts in Zygapophyseal Joints of Patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis Reveal Repair Mechanisms Similar to Osteoarthritis

Objective.

New bone formation of the spine is a typical feature of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). It is unknown whether new bone formation is part of a physiological repair process or a unique pathological entity of the disease.

Methods.

We analyzed zygapophyseal joints from patients with AS and osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing spinal surgery for rigid hyperkyphosis (AS) or radiculopathy caused by severe OA. In 17 patients with AS, 11 with OA, and 5 controls we performed immunohistochemical analysis of osteoprotegerin (OPG), nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), and osteocalcin (OC) expression in osteoblasts and determined the trabecular thickness in AS and OA patients and controls. Osteoclasts were detected by tartrate-resistant alkaline phosphatase (TRAP) staining.

Results.

Trabecular thickness was significantly lower in patients with AS compared to OA (p = 0.01). The absolute number of CD56+ osteoblasts (p < 0.001) and OC+ (p = 0.002), OPG+ (p = 0.003), and RANKL+ osteoblasts (p = 0.03) in AS patients was also significantly lower than in OA patients. The percentages of OC+, OPG+, and RANKL+ osteoblasts did not differ between AS and OA (p > 0.05 in all cases). In controls, the percentages of OPG+ (p = 0.013) and OC+ (p = 0.034) but not RANKL+ (p > 0.05) osteoblasts were significantly lower compared to AS patients. The frequency of TRAP+ osteoclasts in AS patients was significantly lower compared to OA (p < 0.001), but higher compared to controls.

Conclusion.

Immunohistochemical analysis of zygapophyseal joints suggested that osteoblast activity is similar in AS and OA, indicating that new bone formation is possibly a physiological function of repair in both diseases.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during spine surgery: a review

Spinal surgery involves a wide spectrum of procedures during which the spinal cord, nerve roots, and key blood vessels are frequently placed at risk for injury. Neuromonitoring provides an opportunity to assess the functional integrity of susceptible neural elements during surgery. The methodology of obtaining and interpreting data from various neuromonitoring modalities-such as somatosensory evoked potentials, motor evoked potentials, spontaneous electromyography, and triggered electromyography-is reviewed in this report. Also discussed are the major benefits and limitations of each modality, as well as the strength of each alone and in combination with other modalities, with regard to its sensitivity, specificity, and overall value as a diagnostic tool. Finally, key clinical recommendations for the interpretation and step-wise decision-making process for intervention are discussed. Multimodality neuromonitoring relies on the strengths of different types of neurophysiological modalities to maximize the diagnostic efficacy in regard to sensitivity and specificity in the detection of impending neural injury. Thorough knowledge of the benefits and limitations of each modality helps in optimizing the diagnostic value of intraoperative monitoring during spinal procedures. As many spinal surgeries continue to evolve along a pathway of minimal invasiveness, it is quite likely that the value of neuromonitoring will only continue to become more prominent.

Electrophysiological monitoring during surgery for cervical degenerative myelopathy and radiculopathy

Object

The objective of this systematic review was to use evidence-based medicine to examine the diagnostic and therapeutic utility of intraoperative electrophysiological (EP) monitoring in the surgical treatment of cervical degenerative disease.

Methods

The National Library of Medicine and Cochrane Database were queried using MeSH headings and key words relevant to cervical spine surgery and EP monitoring. The guidelines group assembled an evidentiary table summarizing the quality of evidence (Classes I–III). The group formulated recommendations that contained the degree of strength based on the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines network. Validation was done through peer review by the Joint Guidelines Committee of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons/Congress of Neurological Surgeons.

Results

The reliance on changes in EP monitoring as an indication to alter a surgical plan or administer steroids has not been observed to reduce the incidence of neurological injury during routine surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy or cervical radiculopathy (Class III). However, there is an absence of study data examining the benefit of altering a surgical plan due to EP changes.

Conclusions

Although the use of EP monitoring may serve as a sensitive means to diagnose potential neurological injury during anterior spinal surgery for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, the practitioner must understand that intraoperative EP worsening is not specific—it may not represent clinical worsening and its recognition does not necessarily prevent neurological injury, nor does it result in improved outcome (Class II). Intraoperative improvement in EP parameters/indices does not appear to forecast outcome with reliability (conflicting Class I data).

Topographic distribution of the tibial somatosensory evoked potential using coherence

The objective of the present study was to determine the adequate cortical regions based on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recording. This investigation was carried out using magnitude-squared coherence (MSC), a frequency domain objective response detection technique. Electroencephalographic signals were collected (International 10-20 System) from 38 volunteers, without history of neurological pathology, during somatosensory stimulation. Stimuli were applied to the right posterior tibial nerve at the rate of 5 Hz and intensity slightly above the motor threshold. Response detection was based on rejecting the null hypothesis of response absence (significance level alpha= 0.05 and M = 500 epochs). The best detection rates (maximum percentage of volunteers for whom the response was detected for the frequencies between 4.8 and 72 Hz) were obtained for the parietal and central leads mid-sagittal and ipsilateral to the stimulated leg: C4 (87%), P4 (82%), Cz (89%), and Pz (89%). The P37-N45 time-components of the SEP can also be observed in these leads. The other leads, including the central and parietal contralateral and the frontal and fronto-polar leads, presented low detection capacity. If only contralateral leads were considered, the centro-parietal region (C3 and P3) was among the best regions for response detection, presenting a correspondent well-defined N37; however, this was not observed in some volunteers. The results of the present study showed that the central and parietal regions, especially sagittal and ipsilateral to the stimuli, presented the best SNR in the gamma range. Furthermore, these findings suggest that the MSC can be a useful tool for monitoring purposes.

Predictive value of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring during cervical spine surgery: a prospective analysis of 1055 consecutive patients

Object

Despite the growing use of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (IOM) in cervical spinal surgery, limited data exist regarding the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of such a technique in detecting new neurological deficits in this setting. The authors sought to define the incidence of significant intraoperative electrophysiological changes and new postoperative neurological deficits in a cohort of patients undergoing cervical surgery.

Methods

The authors conducted a prospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients who had undergone cervical surgery during a 5-year period at a university-based neurosurgical unit, in which multimodal IOM was recorded. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values (PPVs), and negative predictive values (NPVs) were determined using standard Bayesian techniques. The study population included 1055 patients (614 male and 441 female) with a mean age of 55 years.

Results

The IOM modalities performed included somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) recording in 1055 patients, motor evoked potential (MEP) recording in 26, and electromyography (EMG) in 427. Twenty-six patients (2.5%) had significant SSEP changes. Electromyographic activity was transient in 212 patients (49.6%), and 115 patients (26.9%) had sustained burst or train activity. New postoperative neurological deficits occurred in 34 patients (3.2%): 6 had combined sensory and motor deficits, 7 had new sensory deficits, 9 had increased motor weakness, and 12 had new root deficits. Of these 34 patients, 12 had spinal tumors, of which 7 were intramedullary. Overall, of the 34 new postoperative deficits, 21 completely resolved, 9 partially resolved, and 4 had no improvement. The deficits that completely resolved did so on average 3.3 months after surgery. Patients with deficits that did not fully resolve (partial or no improvement) were followed up for an average of 1.8 years after surgery.

Somatosensory evoked potentials had a sensitivity of 52%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, and an NPV of 97%. Motor evoked potential sensitivity was 100%, specificity 96%, PPV 96%, and NPV 100%. Electromyography had a sensitivity of 46%, specificity of 73%, PPV of 3%, and an NPV of 97%.

Conclusions

Combined neurophysiological IOM with EMG and SSEP recording and the selective use of MEPs is helpful for predicting and possibly preventing neurological injury during cervical spine surgery.

Risk factors for false positive transcranial motor evoked potential monitoring alerts during surgical treatment of cervical myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive series review.

OBJECTIVE

To examine performance of transcranial motor-evoked potential (TcMEP) monitoring in patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy and potential risk factors for false positive alerts.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although use of TcMEP monitoring has been increasing and has been specifically recommended in patients with cervical myelopathy, rates and risk factors for false positive alerts have not been established.

METHODS

Intraoperative neuromonitoring data for 52 consecutive patients undergoing surgery for cervical myelopathy were reviewed. All major TcMEP alerts were identified. Comprehensive demographic and clinical data, preoperative imaging studies, operative, and anesthesia records were reviewed.

RESULTS

Six of 52 patients (12%) experienced a major TcMEP alert consisting of sustained >80% loss of amplitude. There were no somatosensory-evoked potential (SSEP)-related alerts. In 2 cases, an intraoperative wake-up test was negative and in 3 cases, surgery was completed without a wake-up test and without recovery of TcMEP signals. No new postoperative neurologic deficits were observed in these patients. One patient with new postoperative weakness was correctly predicted by loss of TcMEP signals. No new deficit was observed in the remaining 46 patients. Statistical analysis revealed significantly higher body mass index (28.8 vs. 35.0; P = 0.032) and length of surgery (191 vs. 283 minutes; P = 0.019) in patients with false positive alerts.

CONCLUSION

In this series of cervical myelopathy patients, sensitivity and specificity of TcMEP for detection of clinically significant intraoperative cord injury were 100% and 90%, respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of SSEP were 0% and 100%, respectively. The positive predictive value of a TcMEP alert was 17%. Possible risk factors for false positive TcMEP alerts include obesity and increased length of surgery. This study supports superior sensitivity of TcMEP compared with SSEP monitoring but identifies a relatively high false positive rate even in a selected high-risk cervical myelopathy population when this modality is applied in practice.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring during spinal surgery

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) is a battery of neurophysiologic tests used to assess the functional integrity of the spinal cord, nerve roots, and other peripheral nervous system structures (eg, brachial plexus) during spinal surgery. The underlying principle of IONM is to identify emerging insult to nervous system structures, pathways, and/or related vascular supply and to provide feedback regarding correlative changes in neural function before development of irreversible neural injury. IONM data provide an opportunity for intervention to prevent or minimize postoperative neurologic deficit. Current multimodality monitoring techniques permit intraoperative assessment of the functional integrity of afferent dorsal sensory spinal cord tracts, efferent ventral spinal cord motor tracts, and nerve roots. Combined use of these techniques is useful during complex spinal surgery because these monitoring modalities provide important complementary information to the surgery team.

Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgical procedures in 246 patients

A prospective study of 246 patients who received multimodal intraoperative monitoring during cervical spine surgery between March 2000 and December 2005. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of MIOM techniques used to monitor spinal cord and nerve root function during cervical spine surgery. It is appreciated that complication rate of cervical spine surgery is low, however, there is a significant risk of neurological injury. The combination of monitoring of ascending and descending pathways may provide more sensitive and specific results giving immediate feedback information and/or alert regarding any neurological changes during the operation to the surgeon. Intraoperative somatosensory spinal and cerebral evoked potentials combined with continuous EMG and motor-evoked potentials of the spinal cord and muscles were evaluated and compared with postoperative clinical neurological changes. A total of 246 consecutive patients with cervical pathologies, majority spinal stenosis due to degenerative changes of cervical spine were monitored by means of MIOM during the surgical procedure. About 232 patients presented true negative while 2 patients false negative responses. About ten patients presented true positive responses where neurological deficit after the operation was predicted and two patients presented false positive findings. The sensitivity of MIOM applied during cervical spine procedure (anterior and/or posterior) was 83.3% and specificity of 99.2%. MIOM is an effective method of monitoring the spinal cord functional integrity during cervical spine surgery and can help to reduce the risk of neurological deficit by alerting the surgeon when monitoring changes are observed.