An evidence-based clinical guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (update)

Do clinical practice guidelines for low back pain include predatory journal or retracted publications? A meta-research study

BACKGROUND

Following clinical practice guidelines is widely recommended for treating many musculoskeletal diagnoses, including low back pain, but it is unknown if clinical practice guidelines for low back pain do.

OBJECTIVE

Assess whether clinical practice guidelines for low back pain reference publications from predatory journals or include retracted publications.

DESIGN

Meta-research.

METHODS

Clinical practice guidelines focusing on the management of adults with low back pain published between January 2010-June 2024 were included. All referenced publications in each guideline were evaluated for predatory categorization using a systematic process that included assessing publisher/journal websites, the Directory of Open Access Journals, Beall's List and major literature databases. The Retraction Watch Database was used to assess retraction status.

RESULTS

Nineteen clinical practice guidelines with 1617 unique publications met inclusion criteria. The majority of publications (1598/1617; 98.8 %) were categorized as 'non-predatory.' Fourteen publications (0.9 %) were categorized as 'predatory,' two (0.1 %) 'presumed predatory,' and three (0.2 %) were retracted. Four guidelines cited 'predatory' and/or 'presumed predatory' publications, and four guidelines cited the retracted publications.

CONCLUSION

Only 1.2 % of the cited publications included in clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain were deemed predatory or retracted, implying that guideline recommendations are unlikely to be influenced by their inclusion. There are currently no standard criteria for how to manage the inclusion of these publications in guidelines or systematic reviews. Future research should investigate the development of a valid and reliable checklist that allows authors to assess for and manage the presence of predatory or retracted publications.

Comparison of clinical efficacy between Percutaneous Endoscopic Large channels nerve decompression through Translaminar approach and Percutaneous Endoscopy Conventional channels nerve decompression through Transforaminal approach for the treatment of degenerative L4/5 spinal stenosis: a retrospective study

OBJECYTIVE

Percutaneous endoscopic surgery via the interlaminar approach and transforaminal approach are commonly used for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, and in order to compare the clinical efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Large channel Translaminar approach (PEL-TL) and Percutaneous Endoscopy Conventional channels Transforaminal approach (PEC-TF) in the treatment of degenerative L4/5 spinal stenosis.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 124 patients who underwent percutaneous endoscopic single segment unilateral decompression surgery for degenerative L4/5 spinal stenosis in our hospital from January 2020 to January 2023. They were divided into PEL-TL group and PEC-TF group according to different surgical methods. Recording general information of two groups of patients, including age, gender, course of disease, and length of hospital stay. Recording the surgical time, C-arm fluoroscopy frequency, incidence and type of complications for two groups of patients. CT was used to measure the Lateral Recess Angle (LRA), and MRI was used to measure the Dural Sac Cross sectional Area (DSCA) to evaluate the degree of lateral recess stenosis and compare the neurological decompression between the two groups. Using the White Panjabi scoring system (WP) to evaluate local stability before and 3 months after surgery. Recording the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for preoperative and postoperative hip and lower limb pain in two groups of patients. Evaluateing the efficacy using the modified Macnab criteria one year after surgery.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in general information between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). The surgery time in the PEL-TL group was shorter than that in the PEC-TF group (P < 0.05). The number of C-arm fluoroscopy in the PEL-TL group was significantly lower than that in the PEC-TF group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of complications between the two groups of patients (11.1% in the PEL-TL group and 14.3% in the PEC-TF group) (P > 0.05). The postoperative recurrence rate of PEL-TL is lower than that of PEC-TF (P < 0.05). All enrolled patients were followed up regularly for 1 year. There was no significant difference in preoperative LRA and DSCA between the two groups of patients (P > 0.05). After 1 year of surgery, LRA and DSCA in both groups were significantly larger than before (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative DSCA between the two groups, but LRA in the PEL-TL group was more significantly larger than that in the PEC-TF group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in preoperative and postoperative WP between the two groups of patients, and there was no significant difference in WP in two groups. The ODI scores and the VAS scores of buttock and lower limb pain at each follow-up time point after surgery in both groups of patients showed significant improvement compared to before surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in functional scores between the two groups at each follow-up time point (p > 0.05). One year after surgery, the efficacy was evaluated using the modified Macnab criteria. Among them, in the PEL-TL group, 36 cases were excellent and 14 cases were good, with an excellent and good rate of 92.6%. In the PEC-TF group, 48 cases were excellent and 16 cases were good, with an excellent and good rate of 91.4%. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both surgical methods can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy in treating degenerative lumbar 4/5 spinal stenosis. PEL-TL has fewer C-arm fluoroscopy times, wider decompression range, shorter surgical time, and lower recurrence rate during surgery, while PEC-TF can be routinely performed under local anesthesia to reduce anesthesia risk.

A look back at lumbar spinal stenosis cases in older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND

The management of elective surgeries during the COVID-19 pandemic was controversial, and the impact on lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) surgery outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze older adults who underwent LSS surgery during the pandemic and compare cases from its early and late phases.

METHODS

Medical records of patients aged 65 and older who underwent LSS surgery between April 2020 and April 2023 were reviewed. The Zurich Claudication Questionnaire and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) were administered preoperatively and at 6 months and 1 year postoperatively.

RESULTS

The period from April 2020 to September 2021 was classified as the early phase, while October 2021 to April 2023 was classified as the late phase. This study evaluated a total of 267 older patients with LSS, with 138 undergoing surgery during the early phase and 129 during the late phase. There was one case of COVID-19 infection during hospitalization in the early phase and none in the late phase. Significant differences were found between the early and late phases in the distribution of American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA) and frequency of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS). When the association between the COVID-19 pandemic phase and effective case of surgery treatment on JOABPEQ was examined, the multivariable adjusted relative risks of effective case in social life domain for the late-stage group were 0.7 (95 % CI = 0.5-0.9) at both 6 months and 1 year postoperatively using the early-phase group as the reference. No significant differences were found in the other four domains at either 6 months or 1 year postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Poorer social life outcomes in the late-phase patients with LSS surgery may be attributed to worse preoperative ASA scores and changes in social life during different pandemic phases.

Does incidental durotomy affect clinical outcome in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases after posterior open lumbar interbody fusion? a multicenter observational study

BACKGROUND

Incidental durotomy (ID) during spinal surgery is common during spinal surgery. This study aimed to determine whether intraoperative ID affects the perioperative and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar disease (DLD) undergoing posterior open lumbar interbody fusion (POLIF).

METHODS

This multicenter observational study was conducted at two spinal centers between January 2020 and December 2022. The patients were divided into ID and non-ID groups according to whether ID occurred intraoperatively. Primary outcome measure was the length of hospital stay (LOS), while secondary outcome measures were 30-day readmission rate; hospital costs; postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain (LP) at 1 day, 3, 7, and 15 days, 1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months; and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) at 1 month, 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Intraoperative ID occurred in 8.7% (36/415) patients. LOS, operative time, estimated blood loss, 30-day readmission rate, and hospital costs were significantly higher in the ID group. On average, the LOS increased by 2.9 days and hospital costs increased by 4800.2 yuan per patient. The ID group had significantly higher baseline VAS scores for LBP 15 days and 1 month postoperatively than the non-ID group. The ODI was significantly higher in the ID group than in the non-ID group 1 month postoperatively. No significant differences were noted in the VAS scores and ODI between the two groups at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Finally, we found that a higher BMI (P = 0.035, OR: 1.195, 95%CI: 1.012-1.412) and revision surgery (P = 0.022, OR: 2.901, 95%CI: 1.164-7.233) were risk factors for intraoperative ID.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ID does not significantly affect the long-term outcomes in patients with DLD after POLIF, it can lead to poorer perioperative clinical outcomes. Lumbar fusion surgery should be performed meticulously to minimize the incidence of intraoperative ID.

Repeat Discectomy or Instrumented Surgery for Recurrent Lumbar Disk Herniation: An Overview of French Spine Surgeons' Practice

Study designRetrospective multicenter cohort study.ObjectiveRecurrent lumbar disc herniation (ReLDH) is a common condition requiring surgical intervention in a large proportion of cases. Evidence regarding the appropriate choice between repeat microdiscectomy (RD) and instrumented surgery (IS) is lacking. To understand the indications for either of the procedures and compare the results, we aimed to provide an overview of spine surgeon practice in France.MethodsThis retrospective, multicenter analysis included adults who underwent surgery for ReLDHs between December 2020 and May 2021. Surgeons were asked which of the following factors determined their therapeutic choice: radio-clinical considerations, non-discal anatomical factors, patient preference, or surgeon background. Data on preoperative clinical status and radiologic findings were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed and compared using propensity scores preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively.ResultsThe study included 150 patients (72 IS and 78 RD). Radioclinical elements, anatomical data, patient preferences, and surgeon background influenced the choice of RD in 57.7%, 1.3%, 25.6%, and 15.4% of the cases, respectively, and IS in 34.7%, 6.9%, 13.9%, and 44.5% of the cases, respectively. At 12 months, patient satisfaction, return to work, and changes in PROMs were not significantly different between the groups.ConclusionsThe decision-making process included both objective and subjective factors, resulting in patient satisfaction in 80.3% to 81.5% of cases, with significant clinical improvement in radicular symptoms in 75.8% to 91.8% of cases, and quality of life in 75.8% to 84.9% of cases, depending on the procedure performed.

Untreated symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis and health-related quality of life: the locomotive Syndrome and Health Outcome in Aizu Cohort Study (LOHAS)

PURPOSE

This study compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between untreated and conservatively treated patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) using data from the Locomotive Syndrome and Health Outcome in Aizu Cohort Study.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed HRQoL using the SF-12 survey in patients diagnosed with symptomatic LSS via a self-reported history questionnaire. LSS treatment history was confirmed through physician interviews. The study included untreated (UTG) and conservatively treated patients (CTG). One-to-one nearest-neighbor propensity score matching compared patients receiving and not receiving conservative treatment. Propensity scores were calculated using background data: age, sex, height, weight, smoking, difficulty walking 100 m, urinary incontinence during walking, comorbidities, musculoskeletal disease treatment history, and questionnaires (depression screening, low back pain-specific QoL, self-efficacy regarding falls, physical activity assessment, and the 2008 SF-12).

RESULTS

In 2008, 376 patients were diagnosed with symptomatic LSS. At the 1-year follow-up, 251 were untreated, 144 received conservative treatment, and 11 underwent lumbar spinal surgery. Before matching, overall HRQoL was lower in the CTG than in the UTG at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Mental health scores in the CTG significantly decreased at the 1-year follow-up. After matching, the median change in mental health scores was significantly lower in the CTG than in the UTG.

CONCLUSION

At baseline and the 1-year follow-up, HRQoL was lower in the CTG compared to the UTG. Additionally, there was no apparent QoL deterioration in the UTG during the 1-year follow-up, even when patients followed their natural medical consultation behaviors.

Can We Improve Our Routine Urological Assessment to Exclude Neurogenic Causes for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction? ICI-RS 2024

AIMS

After presentation with urinary symptoms, an underlying neurological mechanism sometimes emerges subsequently. Increased awareness may bring earlier diagnosis, improving prognosis and outcomes.

METHODS

A 2024 International Consultation on Incontinence Research Society think-tank considered the clinical pathway for identification of an undiagnosed neurological or autonomic contribution precipitating urinary symptoms, and the implications for prognosis.

RESULTS

Alongside adult-onset neurogenic conditions, potential for missed diagnosis includes congenital and pediatric-acquired neurogenic conditions, which may become symptomatic during a growth spurt due to spinal cord tethering. Detailed assessment is needed, also considering bowel and sexual dysfunction, with timely referral to neurology to reduce preventable progression of disease. In neurological assessment, control of micturition is often poorly characterized compared with other aspects of spinal cord function and the cranial nerves. Screening tools may be used to identify people who have increased likelihood of particular conditions, but currently available tools are either single-system or population specific. In addition to the general pelvic examination, the assessment of sacral reflexes and pelvic sensations can suggest a neurological mechanism, though the sensitivity and specificity of the neuro-urological examination is unknown. Including the results of the neuro-perineal examination in the urodynamic report may improve the interpretation of the results and potentially support a neurological aetiology.

CONCLUSION

Future research should consider the value of neuro-urological examination in diagnosis of occult neurological disease, the development of an occult neurology screening tool/risk scoring based on pelvic organ symptoms, and appropriateness of non-neurologist practitioners requesting neurological investigations such as MRI scanning.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Does not apply.

Development of machine learning model for predicting prolonged operation time in lumbar stenosis undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Longer posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgeries for individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis are linked to more complications and negatively affect recovery after the operation. Therefore, there is a critical need for a method to accurately predict patients who are at risk for prolonged operation times.

PURPOSE

This research aimed to develop a clinical model to predict prolonged operation time for patients undergoing PLIF procedures.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This study employs a machine-learning approach to analyze data retrospectively collected.

PATIENT SAMPLE

About 3,233 patients diagnosed with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) had posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) at 22 hospitals in China from January 2015 to December 2022.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was operation time. Prolonged operation time defined as exceeded 75% of the overall surgical duration, which mean exceeding 240 minutes.

METHODS

A total of 3,233 patients who underwent PLIF surgery with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) were divided into one training group and four test groups based on different district areas. The training group included 1,569 patients, while Test1 had 541, Test2 had 403, Test3 had 351, and Test4 had 369 patients. Variables consisted of demographics, perioperative details, preoperative laboratory examinations and other Additional factors. Six algorithms were employed for variable screening, and variables identified by more than two screening methods were incorporated into the final model. In the training cohort, a 10-fold cross-validation (CV) and Bayesian hyperparameter optimization techniques were utilized to construct a model using eleven machine learning algorithms. Following this, the model was evaluated using four separate external test sets, and the mean Area Under the Curve (AUC) was computed to determine the best-performing model. Further performance metrics of the best model were evaluated, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability analysis to enhance decision-making transparency. Ultimately, an online calculator was created.

RESULTS

Among the various machine learning models, the Random Forest achieved the highest performance in the validation set, with AUROC scores of 0.832 in Test1, 0.834 in Test2, 0.816 inTest3, 0.822 in Test4) compared with other machine learning models. The top contributing variables were number of levels fusion, pre-APTT, weight and age. The predictive model was further refined by developing a web-based calculator for clinical application (https://wenle.shinyapps.io/PPOT_LSS/).

CONCLUSIONS

This predictive model can facilitate identification of risk for prolonged operation time following PLIF surgery. Predictive calculators are expected to improve preoperative planning, identify patients with high risk factors, and help clinicians facilitating the improvement of treatment plans and the implementation of clinical intervention.

Impairment in Activities of Daily Living and Related Factors in Older Adults with Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis before Hospitalization

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) impairs activities of daily living (ADL) in older adults. Factors associated with ADL impairment in LSS have not been identified. This study aimed to ascertain the pre-admission living conditions in older adults with LSS and investigate the factors associated with impairment in ADL.

METHODS

A total of 261 community-dwelling older adults aged ≥65 years with LSS, scheduled for surgery were included. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was used to assess ADL impairment. The Life-Space Assessment was used to assess the extent and frequency of outings. Pain, numbness, continuous walking distance, and health-related quality of life as psychosomatic functions. Falls self-efficacy and the degree of social isolation were assessed as social life status. Factors associated with ADL impairment were examined using multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Significant differences were found in psychosomatic functioning, living space, and falls self-efficacy depending on the presence or absence of ADL impairment. The ODI sub-components showed a stronger degree of impairment in pain intensity, walking, standing, and social life. There were significant differences in the frequency of going outside the home and inside the neighborhood, ADL impairment was shown to affect the frequency of outings within close proximity to their lives. Numbness was associated with ADL impairment (odds ratio=1.2; 95% confidence interval 1.1-1.4).

CONCLUSION

Assessing the degree of numbness is important in predicting ADL impairment in older adults with LSS. Additionally, assessing the living conditions and taking an appropriate approach before admission can help prevent ADL impairment.

Age diversity among older surgically treated patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective comparative study of early and late older adults

BACKGROUND

At present, the threshold defining older adults is 65 years, and this classification has been widely accepted globally. However, with the extension of both life expectancy and healthy life expectancy, there is a need to reconsider this age-based definition. This study compared the characteristics and surgical outcomes of older patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) between the early and late stages to clarify age diversity in this population.

METHODS

Data collected from consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent LSS surgery were retrospectively reviewed. All participants completed the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire, Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), and 25-Question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale preoperatively as well as 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Frailty was evaluated using the 11-point modified frailty index. Polypharmacy was defined as the concomitant use of at least six drugs.

RESULTS

In total, 311 older patients with LSS were enrolled. Among them, 136 patients younger than 75 were categorized into the E group, and 175 patients aged 75 and older were categorized into the L group. Baseline characteristics, including frailty and polypharmacy, significantly differed between the groups. The frequency of effective case of surgical treatment on JOABPEQ was significantly lower for walking ability in the L group. At 1 year after surgery, the incidence of non-improvement in locomotive syndrome stages was higher in the L group than in the E group (relative risk = 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.08-1.78). In addition, when the L group was further divided into three subgroups based on age, the relative risk was 1.32 (95% CI = 0.99-1.76) for patients aged 75 to < 80, 1.42 (95% CI = 1.07-1.88) for those aged 80 to < 85 years, and 1.68 (95% CI = 1.16-2.45) for those aged ≥ 85.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics and postoperative improvement of walking ability and locomotive syndrome based on age among older patients with LSS. Our findings underscore the significant age diversity among older adults, highlighting the necessity of considering each patient in a more nuanced age-specific manner rather than adopting a one-size-fits-all approach.

Anemia-induced Claudication Mimicking Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Case Report

Anemia is not known to cause intermittent claudication. We herein present the case of a 74-year-old male patient with intermittent claudication, in whom the primary symptom was severe iron-deficiency anemia. The characteristics of claudication mimicked a neurogenic disorder, but lumbar magnetic resonance imaging ruled out lumbar spinal stenosis, and the symptoms resolved after the anemia improved. This case highlights the need to consider anemia in the differential diagnosis of patients presenting with intermittent neurogenic claudication. A comprehensive evaluation, including tests to rule out anemia, is crucial for making an accurate diagnosis and carrying out the appropriate management of intermittent claudication.

Effect of Different Interventions on Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Evaluation and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the preferred option for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) when conservative methods cannot meet the needs. Recent advancements in surgical techniques have brought various new methods for treating LSS.

METHODS

Four databases, PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, were searched, covering the period from the establishment of the databases until May 2024. Randomized controlled trials were carried out to treat LSS using different surgical approaches. The outcome measures included the visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oswestry disability index score, surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, and length of hospital stay of patients. Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was performed using R software (V4.4) and STATA17.0 software to analyze each surgical approach.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies involving 4200 patients were included. Nine intervention methods, including laminotomy, decompression, decompression plus fusion, endoscopic decompression, interspinous process spacer device (IPSD), laminectomy, minimally invasive decompression, spinous process osteotomy, and lumbar interbody fusion, were analyzed. Network meta-analysis results indicated that endoscopic decompression (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA = 88.70%) was the most effective in reducing short-term back VAS scores. IPSD (SUCRA = 98.00%) was the most effective in reducing long-term back VAS scores, surgical duration (SUCRA = 95.20%), and intraoperative blood loss (SUCRA = 100.00%). Endoscopic decompression (SUCRA = 83.60%) also showed the most significant effect in reducing hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic decompression can effectively improve short-term back VAS scores and reduce hospital stays, while IPSD is effective in reducing long-term back VAS scores with minimal surgical duration and blood loss.

Two-Stage Surgical Treatment of Combined Lumbar Spine Stenosis in a Professional Football Player

INTRODUCTION

Playing football (American soccer) at the elite level places extremely high demands on the spine. The choice of treatment for lumbar spinal canal stenosis combined with spondylolysis and anterolisthesis is challenging for surgeons, physicians, and clinicians.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 28-year-old elite football player from the leading Russian football club is the focus of this case study. Patient complained of constant low back pain radiating to the posterior surface of the right thigh and limited mobility in the lumbar spine.

DIAGNOSIS

The patient was diagnosed with degenerative stenosis of the spinal canal at the L5 to S1 level, L4 to L5 disc herniation, spondylolysis, and anterolisthesis of L5 vertebra.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOMES

Two-stage surgery of combined lumbar spine pathology was performed in May 2021. The first stage of surgical treatment included the spinal and foraminal canals decompression at the L4 to L5 and L5 to S1 levels, as well as posterior fusion with rigid pedicle screws. The second stage involved the subsequent replacement of the rigid to dynamic semirigid rods as signs of the bone defect healing appeared. The athlete returned to team training 6 months after the first stage of surgery and was able to play football at the elite level without restrictions 1 year after the first stage and just 30 days following the second stage of surgical treatment. The athlete continues his career as of the last manuscript's revision.

CONCLUSIONS

This method holds potential as an effective approach in the treatment of combined lumbar spine pathology among elite athletes.

Effects of axial loading and positions on lumbar spinal stenosis: an MRI study using a new axial loading device

OBJECTIVE

A new axial loading device was used to investigate the effects of axial loading and positions on lumbar structure and lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

A total of 40 patients sequentially underwent 4 examinations: (1) the psoas-relaxed position MRI, (2) the extended position MRI, (3) the psoas-relaxed position axial loading MRI, (4) the extended position axial loading MRI. The dural sac cross-sectional area, sagittal vertebral canal diameter, disc height and ligamentum flavum thickness of L3-4, L4-5, L5-S1 and lumbar lordosis angle were measured and compared. A new device with pneumatic shoulder-hip compression mode was used for axial loading.

RESULTS

In the absence of axial loading, there was a significant reduction in dural sac cross-sectional area with extension only seen at the L3-4 (p = 0.033) relative to the dural sac area in the psoas-relaxed position. However, with axial loading, there was a significant reduction in dural sac cross-sectional area at all levels in both psoas-relaxed (L3-4, p = 0.041; L5-S1, p = 0.005; L4-5, p = 0.002) and extension (p < 0.001) positions. The sagittal vertebral canal diameter and disc height were significantly reduced at all lumbar levels with axial loading and extension (p < 0.001); however, in psoas-relaxed position, the sagittal vertebral canal diameter was only reduced with axial loading at L3-4 (p = 0.018) and L4-5 (p = 0.011), and the disc height was reduced with axial-loading at all levels (L3-4, p = 0.027; L5-S1, p = 0.001; L4-5, p < 0.001). The ligamentum flavum thickness and lumbar lordosis in extension position had a statistically significant increase compared to psoas-relaxed position with or without axial loading (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both axial loading and extension of lumbar may exacerbate lumbar spinal stenosis. Axial loading in extension position could maximally aggravate lumbar spinal stenosis, but may cause some patients intolerable. For those patients, axial loading MRI in psoas-relaxed position may be a good choice.

Possible negative impact of polypharmacy on surgical outcomes in older patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

AIM

Older patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) have a higher incidence of polypharmacy attributed to comorbidities and the use of pain relief medications. This study aimed to explore the effect of polypharmacy and hyperpolypharmacy on surgical outcomes in older patients with LSS based on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and locomotive syndrome.

METHODS

Consecutive patients aged ≥65 years who underwent lumbar spinal surgery for LSS were retrospectively reviewed. We assessed the preoperative and 1- and 2-year postoperative scores of three common HRQOL tools and the 25-question Geriatric Locomotive Function Scale. The patients were classified into the hyperpolypharmacy group (those taking ≥10 medications), polypharmacy group (those taking 6-9 medications) and non-polypharmacy group (those taking ≤5 medications).

RESULTS

In total, 148 participants were evaluated. Among them, 35 were included in the non-polypharmacy group. There were no significant changes in the HRQOL and locomotive syndrome stage at baseline, even with polypharmacy progression. However, the HRQOL and locomotive syndrome stage worsened postoperatively with polypharmacy progression. When surgical efficacy was directly examined, results showed that the surgical outcomes were significantly associated with polypharmacy progression in older patients with LSS, even after adjusting for potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

Polypharmacy, especially hyperpolypharmacy, had a negative impact on surgical outcomes in older patients with LSS. The number of prescription drugs should be taken into consideration before surgery in this patient group. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 31-37.

Machine Learning and Deep Learning for Diagnosis of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a major cause of pain and disability in older individuals worldwide. Although increasing studies of traditional machine learning (TML) and deep learning (DL) were conducted in the field of diagnosing LSS and gained prominent results, the performance of these models has not been analyzed systematically.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to pool the results and evaluate the heterogeneity of the current studies in using TML or DL models to diagnose LSS, thereby providing more comprehensive information for further clinical application.

METHODS

This review was performed under the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using articles extracted from PubMed, Embase databases, and Cochrane Library databases. Studies that evaluated DL or TML algorithms assessment value on diagnosing LSS were included, while those with duplicated or unavailable data were excluded. Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to estimate the risk of bias in each study. The MIDAS module and the METAPROP module of Stata (StataCorp) were used for data synthesis and statistical analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies with 15,044 patients reported the assessment value of TML or DL models for diagnosing LSS. The risk of bias assessment yielded 4 studies with high risk of bias, 3 with unclear risk of bias, and 5 with completely low risk of bias. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.84 (95% CI: 0.82-0.86; I2=99.06%) and 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.90; I2=98.7%), respectively. The diagnostic odds ratio was 36 (95% CI 26-49), the positive likelihood ratio (LR+) was 6.6 (95% CI 5.1-8.4), and the negative likelihood ratio (LR-) was 0.18 (95% CI 0.16-0.21). The summary receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve of TML or DL models for diagnosing LSS of 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94), indicating a high diagnostic value.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis emphasize that despite the generally satisfactory diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence systems in the experimental stage for the diagnosis of LSS, none of them is reliable and practical enough to apply in real clinical practice. Further efforts, including optimization of model balance, widely accepted objective reference standards, multimodal strategy, large dataset for training and testing, external validation, and sufficient and scientific report, should be made to bridge the distance between current TML or DL models and real-life clinical applications in future studies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42024566535; https://tinyurl.com/msx59x8k.

Anatomic Parameters for Diagnosing Congenital Lumbar Stenosis Based on Computed Tomography of 1,000 Patients

INTRODUCTION

Quantitative parameters for diagnosis of congenital lumbar stenosis (CLS) have yet to be universally accepted. This study establishes parameters for CLS using CT, assessing the influences of patient sex, race, ethnicity, and anthropometric characteristics.

METHODS

Interpedicular distance (IPD), pedicle length, canal diameter, and canal area were measured using 1,000 patients between 18 and 35 years of age who were without spinal pathology.

RESULTS

Irrespective of disk level, threshold values for CLS were 16.1 mm for IPD, 3.9 mm for pedicle length, 11.5 mm for canal diameter, and 142.5 mm 2 for canal area. Notable differences based on patient sex were observed, with men demonstrating larger CLS threshold values with respect to IPD and canal area across all vertebral levels from L1 to L5. Based on patient anthropometric factors, no strong or moderate associations were observed between any spinal measurement and patient height, weight, or body mass index across all levels from L1 to L5. However, notable differences were observed based on patient race and ethnicity from L1 to L5. Asian patients demonstrated the largest pedicle lengths, followed by White, Hispanic, and Black patients in descending order. White patients demonstrated the largest IPD, canal AP diameter, and canal area, followed by Asian, Hispanic, and Black patients in descending order. Black patients demonstrated the smallest values across all anatomic measurements relative to Asian, White, and Hispanic patients.

CONCLUSION

This study reports 25,000 measurements of lumbar central canal dimensions to establish quantitative thresholds for the diagnosis of CLS. Although not influenced by patient height, weight, or body mass index as one might intuit, canal dimensions were influenced by patient sex, race, and ethnicity. These findings may help explain differences in predisposition or prevalence of lumbar nerve root compression among patients of different races, which can be important when considering rates of surgery and access to care.

ChatGPT versus NASS clinical guidelines for degenerative spondylolisthesis: a comparative analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Clinical guidelines, developed in concordance with the literature, are often used to guide surgeons' clinical decision making. Recent advancements of large language models and artificial intelligence (AI) in the medical field come with exciting potential. OpenAI's generative AI model, known as ChatGPT, can quickly synthesize information and generate responses grounded in medical literature, which may prove to be a useful tool in clinical decision-making for spine care. The current literature has yet to investigate the ability of ChatGPT to assist clinical decision making with regard to degenerative spondylolisthesis.

PURPOSE

The study aimed to compare ChatGPT's concordance with the recommendations set forth by The North American Spine Society (NASS) Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and assess ChatGPT's accuracy within the context of the most recent literature.

METHODS

ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0 was prompted with questions from the NASS Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis and graded its recommendations as "concordant" or "nonconcordant" relative to those put forth by NASS. A response was considered "concordant" when ChatGPT generated a recommendation that accurately reproduced all major points made in the NASS recommendation. Any responses with a grading of "nonconcordant" were further stratified into two subcategories: "Insufficient" or "Over-conclusive," to provide further insight into grading rationale. Responses between GPT-3.5 and 4.0 were compared using Chi-squared tests.

RESULTS

ChatGPT-3.5 answered 13 of NASS's 28 total clinical questions in concordance with NASS's guidelines (46.4%). Categorical breakdown is as follows: Definitions and Natural History (1/1, 100%), Diagnosis and Imaging (1/4, 25%), Outcome Measures for Medical Intervention and Surgical Treatment (0/1, 0%), Medical and Interventional Treatment (4/6, 66.7%), Surgical Treatment (7/14, 50%), and Value of Spine Care (0/2, 0%). When NASS indicated there was sufficient evidence to offer a clear recommendation, ChatGPT-3.5 generated a concordant response 66.7% of the time (6/9). However, ChatGPT-3.5's concordance dropped to 36.8% when asked clinical questions that NASS did not provide a clear recommendation on (7/19). A further breakdown of ChatGPT-3.5's nonconcordance with the guidelines revealed that a vast majority of its inaccurate recommendations were due to them being "over-conclusive" (12/15, 80%), rather than "insufficient" (3/15, 20%). ChatGPT-4.0 answered 19 (67.9%) of the 28 total questions in concordance with NASS guidelines (P = 0.177). When NASS indicated there was sufficient evidence to offer a clear recommendation, ChatGPT-4.0 generated a concordant response 66.7% of the time (6/9). ChatGPT-4.0's concordance held up at 68.4% when asked clinical questions that NASS did not provide a clear recommendation on (13/19, P = 0.104).

CONCLUSIONS

This study sheds light on the duality of LLM applications within clinical settings: one of accuracy and utility in some contexts versus inaccuracy and risk in others. ChatGPT was concordant for most clinical questions NASS offered recommendations for. However, for questions NASS did not offer best practices, ChatGPT generated answers that were either too general or inconsistent with the literature, and even fabricated data/citations. Thus, clinicians should exercise extreme caution when attempting to consult ChatGPT for clinical recommendations, taking care to ensure its reliability within the context of recent literature.

Comparison of functional outcomes and patient satisfaction in patients with lumbar canal stenosis with and without concomitant obesity following lumbar decompression surgery and their correlation with BMI

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an important predictor of development of Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) and its symptoms. LCS further restricts the mobility of the patient and a vicious cycle develops. The operative decision on patients with LCS and obesity is a matter of debate. Hence, we attempted to compare changes in body mass index and patient satisfaction in patients with LCS with and without concomitant obesity, undergoing spinal decompression surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing decompression for LCS between 1st June 2019 to 31st May 2020 were included. Baseline characteristics including age, sex, co-morbidities, BMI, self-recorded maximal walking distance (SR-MWD) and Oswestry disability index score (ODI) were recorded. All patients were followed up prospectively at 1 year post surgery. Satisfaction was recorded on a five-point Likert scale. Participants were classified into non obesity (group 1) and obesity (group 2) groups according to JAPI and WHO classification and compared.

RESULTS

55 patients met the inclusion criteria, 23 in group 1 and 32 in group 2. Group 2 showed a mean decrease in BMI of 0.95 ± 1.32 kg/m2 while other group had an increase of 0.14 ± 1.31 kg/m2 (p = 0.021). Significant weight change was seen in 31.3 % group 2 vs 8.7 % group 1 patients which was significant (p = 0.046). Pre operative BMI positively correlated with change in BMI after surgery (r = 0.406, p = 0.001) and with percentage weight reduction (r = 0.321, p = 0.017). Both the groups were comparable in improvement in ODI and SR-MWD scores and patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

Patients with obesity achieve significant reduction in weight and BMI following decompression surgery for LCS. It will further prevent other health conditions attributed to obesity. Both the groups were comparable in ODI, SR-MWD and satisfactory outcome following surgery. Hence obesity should not be a deterring factor for surgical consideration for patients with lumbar canal stenosis.

Impact of computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging registration on rehabilitation after percutaneous endoscopic decompression for lumbar stenosis: Retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) shows promise for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) treatment, but its use is limited by the disease's complexity and procedural challenges.

AIM

In this study, the effects of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) registration techniques on PELD for LSS and postoperative rehabilitation outcomes were evaluated.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted with data from patients who underwent PELD for LSS between January 2021 and December 2023. Patients were assigned to preoperative CT/MRI registration and control groups. Data collected included the operative time, length of hospital stay, visual analog scale (VAS) scores for low back and leg pain, and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) lumbar spine score. Differences between groups were assessed using Student’s t test.

RESULTS

Data from 135 patients (71 in the CT/MRI registration group, 64 in the control group) were analyzed. The operative time was significantly shorter in the CT/MRI registration group (P = 0.007). At 2 months postoperatively, both groups showed significant reductions in VAS leg and low back pain scores (all P < 0.001) and improvements in the JOA score (both P < 0.001). No complication or death occurred. Preoperatively, pain and JOA scores were similar between groups (P = 0.830, P = 0.470, and P = 0.287, respectively). At 2 months postoperatively, patients in the CT/MRI registration group reported lower leg and low back pain levels (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively) and had higher JOA scores (P = 0.004) than did patients in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative CT/MRI registration for PELD for LSS reduced the operative time and VAS pain scores at 2 months and improved JOA scores, demonstrating enhanced effectiveness and safety.

Walking stress-induced changes in gait patterns and muscle activity: Patients with lumbar spinal stenosis versus asymptomatic controls

INTRODUCTION

Patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis (sLSS) are often limited in their walking range because of worsening symptoms, which is thought to induce changes in the gait pattern. The aim of this study was to determine whether changes in gait pattern and muscle activity in these patients are elicited by a walking stress and differ from asymptomatic controls.

METHODS

Twenty patients with sLSS and 19 asymptomatic controls performed a 30-minute walking stress. Gait was assessed using seven inertial sensors and sagittal joint range of motion (ROM) was calculated during different phases of gait. Muscle activation of the gluteus medius, erector spinae and multifidus muscles was measured by surface electromyography (EMG) and integrated EMGs (normalized to the maximum during gait) were calculated. Differences between groups and time points (beginning and end) were assessed using mixed factorial analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Patients had less knee extension ROM in terminal stance, less knee flexion ROM in swing and less overall hip flexion/extension ROM than controls (p ≤ 0.03). There were no functionally relevant changes in these parameters during the walking stress. The integrated EMG was greater in all muscles in patients than in controls and increased in both groups during the walking stress in the paraspinal but not in the gluteus medius muscle. There was no interaction between group and time for any of the parameters.

CONCLUSION

Differences in gait pattern and muscle activity between patients with sLSS and controls are generally present, but are not amplified by a walking stress.

Percutaneous removal and replacement of a novel percutaneous interspinous device

Objective: The aim of this study is to explain the technique used for removing and replacing a novel percutaneous interspinous device (PID).Procedure: Three male patients, with a mean age of 66 years (range 62-72), were included in the study due to displacement (N = 2) or misplacement (N = 1) of the novel PID. This occurred after a mean of 23.3 ± 10.5 days from the initial placement (range 13-34) at the L4-L5 level (N = 1) and L3-L4 level (N = 2). Following the removal of the PID, four new devices were implanted.Conclusion: The novel PID can be safely removed either immediately after its placement during the procedure or after a certain period of days or months from its implantation. The removal procedure can be performed percutaneously under imaging guidance, by closing the four retractable wings, using the same instrumentation as utilized during the initial implantation.

Clinical assessment and management of lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical dilemmas and considerations for surgical referral

Lumbar spinal stenosis is the leading indication for spine surgery in older adults. Surgery is recommended in clinical guidelines if non-surgical treatments have been provided with insufficient benefit. The difficulty for clinicians is that the current number of randomised controlled trials is low, which creates uncertainty about which treatments to provide. For non-surgical clinicians this paucity of data leads to a clinical dilemma of whether to continue managing the patient or refer to a spine surgeon. This Viewpoint aims to provide an update on the assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis, treatment recommendations, indications for referral to a spine surgeon, and current clinical dilemmas facing non-surgical clinicians and spinal surgeons.

Chiropractic and Spinal Manipulation: A Review of Research Trends, Evidence Gaps, and Guideline Recommendations

Chiropractors diagnose and manage musculoskeletal disorders, commonly using spinal manipulative therapy (SMT). Over the past half-century, the chiropractic profession has seen increased utilization in the United States following Medicare authorization for payment of chiropractic SMT in 1972. We reviewed chiropractic research trends since that year and recent clinical practice guideline (CPG) recommendations regarding SMT. We searched Scopus for articles associated with chiropractic (spanning 1972-2024), analyzing publication trends and keywords, and searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for CPGs addressing SMT use (spanning 2013-2024). We identified 6286 articles on chiropractic. The rate of publication trended upward. Keywords initially related to historical evolution, scope of practice, medicolegal, and regulatory aspects evolved to include randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews. We identified 33 CPGs, providing a total of 59 SMT-related recommendations. The recommendations primarily targeted low back pain (n = 21) and neck pain (n = 14); of these, 90% favored SMT for low back pain while 100% favored SMT for neck pain. Recent CPG recommendations favored SMT for tension-type and cervicogenic headaches. There has been substantial growth in the number and quality of chiropractic research articles over the past 50 years, resulting in multiple CPG recommendations favoring SMT. These findings reinforce the utility of SMT for spine-related disorders.

Severity of lumbar spinal stenosis does not impact responsiveness to exercise-based rehabilitation

Spine pain is a prevalent and costly condition affecting up to 85% of individuals throughout their lifetime, and spinal stenosis is one of the most debilitating sources of spine pain. Although conservative management is the first line of treatment for spinal stenosis, severe cases often are directly referred to surgical intervention due to the belief that conservative strategies delay necessary treatment. However, there are no studies supporting the premise that individuals with more severe stenosis respond poorly to conservative management. The purpose of this study was to compare improvements in pain, disability, strength, medication usage, and patient goals in response to an exercise-based physical therapy program across 1,806 individuals with mild, moderate, or severe lumbar spine stenosis. Participants demonstrated significant improvements in all variables of interest (p<0.001), and 11.5% of participants reported cessation of narcotic use with treatment. There were no significant differences in treatment response across mild, moderate, or severe stenosis groups for any outcome (p>0.546). Exercise-based rehabilitation is as beneficial in the short term for individuals presenting for nonoperative care with severe stenosis compared to their milder counterparts. Future research is needed to evaluate long term durability and cost effectiveness of rehabilitation in this patient population.

Causal relationship between smoking and spinal stenosis: Two-sample Mendelian randomization

OBJECTIVE

Currently, the number of patients with spinal stenosis is increasing, and most of the patients are found to have a history of smoking in the clinic. In this study, we used the Mendelian randomization (MR) method to investigate the causal relationship between smoking and spinal stenosis.

METHODS

Genetic loci independently associated with smoking and spinal stenosis in people of European ancestry were selected as instrumental variables using pooled data from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Three MR analyses, MR-Egger, Weighted median and inverse variance weighting (IVW), were used to investigate the causal relationship between smoking and spinal stenosis. The results were tested for robustness by heterogeneity and multiplicity tests, and sensitivity analyses were performed using the "leave-one-out" method.

RESULTS

The IVW results showed an OR (95% CI) of 2.40 (0.31-18.71), P = .403, indicating that there was no causal relationship between smoking and spinal stenosis. And no heterogeneity and multiplicity were found by the test and sensitivity analysis also showed robust results.

CONCLUSION

In this study, genetic data were analyzed and explored using 2-sample MR analysis, and the results showed that there is a causal relationship between smoking and the occurrence of spinal stenosis, and more studies need to be included.

Prediction of transforaminal epidural injection success in sciatica (POTEISS): a protocol for the development of a multivariable prediction model for outcome after transforaminal epidural steroid injection in patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniation or stenosis

BACKGROUND

Transforaminal epidural injections (TEI) can alleviate symptoms and help to maintain physical functioning and quality of life in patients with lumbar radicular pain. We aim to develop a prediction model for patient outcome after TEI in patients suffering from unilateral lumbar radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) or single-level spinal stenosis (LSS). The secondary aim is to estimate short-term patient outcome differences between LDH and LSS patients, the association between psychological variables and patient outcome, the rate of additional injections, surgery and complications, and to explore the short-term cost-effectiveness of TEI.

METHODS

This study is designed as a multi-centre, observational, prospective cohort study in two large regional hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients diagnosed with unilateral lumbar radicular pain secondary to LDH or LSS and congruent with MRI findings, who are referred for TEI along usual care pathways, are eligible for study participation. A total of 388 patients with LDH or LSS will be included. A pre-defined set of demographic, clinical and radiological variables will be used as the predictors in the model. The primary outcome measure is the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for leg pain. Secondary outcome measures include back pain, physical functioning, perceived recovery, pain coping strategies, anxiety and depression and use of analgesics and physical therapy. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks and 6 weeks after treatment. NRS leg pain and Likert perceived recovery data will be used as the dependent variables in a generalized linear mixed model for prediction of TEI outcome, with internal validation of performance (explained variation) by bootstrap resampling. Cost-effectiveness for a period of 6 weeks prior to and after treatment will be performed with decision-analytic modelling.

DISCUSSION

Patients with severe lumbar radicular pain often request additional treatment when conservative care is insufficient. TEI can offer relief of symptoms. Currently, it is not possible to predict responsiveness to this treatment for individual patients. This study is designed to explore predictors that can differentiate between patients that will and will not have a positive outcome after TEI. This information may support treatment strategies for this patient group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov database under registry number NCT04540068 on September 1, 2020.

Can magnetic resonance imaging findings effectively diagnose the instability observed on radiographs in patients with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis?

BACKGROUND

Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a common condition that involves the narrowing of the spinal canal. Diagnosing instability traditionally requires standing lateral radiographs to detect dynamic translation, but there is debate about relying solely on radiographs due to challenges like patient discomfort and radiation exposure. This study aimed to evaluate if Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) findings could effectively diagnose instability observed on radiographs.

METHODS

We reviewed 478 consecutive patients with degenerative LSS who had surgery at our institution. Instability was defined as a sagittal translation exceeding 3 mm on standing lateral radiographs in both extension and flexion. Patients were divided into stable (those with < 3 mm translation) and unstable groups (those with > 3 mm translation). The study assessed potential variables for instability, including MRI findings like facet joint effusion, facet joint angle, disk height index, intradiscal vacuum presence, endplate sclerosis, ligamentum flavum hypertrophy, and multifidus muscle fatty degeneration, comparing these factors between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 478 consecutive patients diagnosed with degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis (LSS) were included. The average age of the patients was 66.32 years, with 43.3% being male. Approximately 27.6% of the cases exhibited signs of instability on the standing lateral radiograph during extension and flexion. The multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression revealed that facet joint effusion (odds ratio [OR] 2.73; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-3.94; P = 0.002), disk height index (OR 2.22; 95% CI 1.68-3.35; P = 0.009), and the presence of the Vacuum sign (OR 1.77; 95% CI 1.32-2.84; P = 0.021) were identified as factors associated with instability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed thata higher facet joint effusion, the presence of Vacuum sign, and a greater Disk Height Index were associated with the presence of instability on the standing lateral radiograph in extension and flexion in patients with degenerative LSS.

Effect of Acupuncture on Neurogenic Claudication Among Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis : A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Acupuncture may improve degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), but evidence is insufficient.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of acupuncture for DLSS.

DESIGN

Multicenter randomized clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03784729).

SETTING

5 hospitals in China.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with DLSS and predominantly neurogenic claudication pain symptoms.

INTERVENTION

18 sessions of acupuncture or sham acupuncture (SA) over 6 weeks, with 24-week follow-up after treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was change from baseline in the modified Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire ([RMDQ] score range, 0 to 24; minimal clinically important difference [MCID], 2 to 3). Secondary outcomes were the proportion of participants achieving minimal (30% reduction from baseline) and substantial (50% reduction from baseline) clinically meaningful improvement per the modified RMDQ.

RESULTS

A total of 196 participants (98 in each group) were enrolled. The mean modified RMDQ score was 12.6 (95% CI, 11.8 to 13.4) in the acupuncture group and 12.7 (CI, 12.0 to 13.3) in the SA group at baseline, and decreased to 8.1 (CI, 7.1 to 9.1) and 9.5 (CI, 8.6 to 10.4) at 6 weeks, with an adjusted difference in mean change of -1.3 (CI, -2.6 to -0.03; P = 0.044), indicating a 43.3% greater improvement compared with SA. The between-group difference in the proportion of participants achieving minimal and substantial clinically meaningful improvement was 16.0% (CI, 1.6% to 30.4%) and 12.6% (CI, -1.0% to 26.2%) at 6 weeks. Three cases of treatment-related adverse events were reported in the acupuncture group, and 3 were reported in the SA group. All events were mild and transient.

LIMITATION

The SA could produce physiologic effects.

CONCLUSION

Acupuncture may relieve pain-specific disability among patients with DLSS and predominantly neurogenic claudication pain symptoms, although the difference with SA did not reach MCID. The effects may last 24 weeks after 6-week treatment.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

2019 National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine "Project of building evidence-based practice capacity for TCM-Project BEBPC-TCM" (NO. 2019XZZX-ZJ).

Automatic segmentation of dura for quantitative analysis of lumbar stenosis: A deep learning study with 518 CT myelograms

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) can be challenging because radicular pain is not often present in the culprit-level localization. Accurate segmentation and quantitative analysis of the lumbar dura on radiographic images are key to the accurate differential diagnosis of LSS. The aim of this study is to develop an automatic dura-contouring tool for radiographic quantification on computed tomography myelogram (CTM) for patients with LSS.

METHODS

A total of 518 CTM cases with or without lumbar stenosis were included in this study. A deep learning (DL) segmentation algorithm 3-dimensional (3D) U-Net was deployed. A total of 210 labeled cases were used to develop the dura-contouring tool, with the ratio of the training, independent testing, and external validation datasets being 150:30:30. The Dice score (DCS) was the primary measure to evaluate the segmentation performance of the 3D U-Net, which was subsequently developed as the dura-contouring tool to segment another unlabeled 308 CTM cases with LSS. Automatic masks of 446 slices on the stenotic levels were then meticulously reviewed and revised by human experts, and the cross-sectional area (CSA) of the dura was compared.

RESULTS

The mean DCS of the 3D U-Net were 0.905 ± 0.080, 0.933 ± 0.018, and 0.928 ± 0.034 in the five-fold cross-validation, the independent testing, and the external validation datasets, respectively. The segmentation performance of the dura-contouring tool was also comparable to that of the second observer (the human expert). With the dura-contouring tool, only 59.0% (263/446) of the automatic masks of the stenotic slices needed to be revised. In the revised cases, there were no significant differences in the dura CSA between automatic masks and corresponding revised masks (p = 0.652). Additionally, a strong correlation of dura CSA was found between the automatic masks and corresponding revised masks (r = 0.805).

CONCLUSIONS

A dura-contouring tool was developed that could automatically segment the dural sac on CTM, and it demonstrated high accuracy and generalization ability. Additionally, the dura-contouring tool has the potential to be applied in patients with LSS because it facilitates the quantification of the dural CSA on stenotic slices.

European Achondroplasia Forum Practical Considerations for Following Adults with Achondroplasia

Achondroplasia is a lifelong condition requiring lifelong management. There is consensus that infants and children with achondroplasia should be managed by a multidisciplinary team experienced in the condition. However, many people are lost to follow-up after the transition from paediatric to adult care, and there is no standardised approach for management in adults, despite the recent availability of international consensus guidelines. To address this, the European Achondroplasia Forum has developed a patient-held checklist to support adults with achondroplasia in managing their health. The checklist highlights key symptoms of spinal stenosis and obstructive sleep apnoea, both among the most frequent and potentially severe medical complications in adults with achondroplasia. The checklist acts as a framework to support individuals and their primary care provider in completing a routine review. General advice on issues such as blood pressure, pain, hearing, weight, adaptive aids, and psychosocial aspects are also included. The checklist provides key symptoms to be aware of, in addition to action points so that people can approach their primary care provider and be directed to the appropriate specialist, if needed. Additionally, the European Achondroplasia Forum offers some ideas on implementing the checklist during the transition from paediatric to adult care, thus ensuring the existing multidisciplinary team model in place during childhood can support in engaging individuals and empowering them to take responsibility for their own care as they move into adulthood.

Clinical Outcomes Following Decompression of Central Canal and Lateral Recess Simultaneous Stenosis, with a Focus on Multilevel Stenosis: A Randomized Comparison of Microscopic Bilateral Laminotomy versus Total Laminectomy with Posterior Spinal Fusion

BACKGROUND

In patients with simultaneous lumbar central spinal stenosis (LCSS) and lateral recess stenosis (LRS) at multiple levels, spinal decompression using microscopic bilateral laminotomy was compared to total laminectomy plus medial facetectomy and fusion (LF).

METHODS

From 2017 to 2022, this trial was performed to examine 96 patients with concomitant LCS and LRS at multilevel. Of the 96 patients, 48 were allocated to the following groups: LF (group I) or microscopic bilateral laminotomy (group II). However, 76 patients completed the study. We compared the outcomes in these 2 groups.

RESULTS

Microscopic bilateral laminotomy was superior in most outcome measures. Delta-visual analog scale leg pain in group II was significantly greater than in group I (mean-group I: 4.368 vs. group II: 5.368, P value = 0.001). Complication and revision rates were lower in the microscopic bilateral laminotomy than in group I, except for incidental durotomy occurrence (group II: 31.58% -group I: 7.89%, P value = 0.0190). The rate of revision surgery for group I compared with group II was 44.74% versus 13.16% (P value = 0.0047), indicating the superiority of laminotomy over LF. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.551 ± 0.6349 in group II versus 6.774 ± 1.197 in group I (P value <0.0001). Also, blood loss during surgery was significantly lower in group II (P value <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that microscopic bilateral laminotomy provides favorable clinical and radiological outcomes for individuals experiencing multilevel lumbar central canal and LRS. However, a higher frequency of durotomy may occur during microsurgical procedures.

Clinical Observation of 10-mm Endoscopic Minimally Invasive Interlaminar Decompression in the Treatment of Ossified Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

PURPOSE

This study aims to observe the safety and effectiveness of 10-mm endoscopic minimally invasive interlaminar decompression in the treatment of ossified lumbar spinal stenosis.

METHODS

The clinical data of 50 consecutive patients with ossified lumbar spinal stenosis were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent minimally invasive interlaminar decompression with 10-mm endoscope. Patient demographics, perioperative data, and clinical outcomes were recorded. Visual analog scale scores, Oswestry disability index scores, and modified Macnab criteria were used to assess clinical outcomes. The lateral recess angle, real spinal canal area, and effective intervertebral foramen area were used to assess the effect of decompression.

RESULTS

The mean age of all patients was 59.0 ± 12.3 years. The mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 43.7 ± 8.7 minutes and <20 ml, respectively. Two years after surgery, the leg pain Visual analog scale score decreased from 7.4 ± 1.0 to 1.6 ± 0.6 (P < 0.05) and the Oswestry disability index score decreased from 63.8 ± 7.6 to 21.7 ± 3.4 (P < 0.05). The lateral recess angle, real spinal canal area and effective intervertebral foramen area were significantly larger than before surgery (P < 0.05). The overall excellent and good rate at the last follow-up was 92.0% according to the modified Macnab criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The 10-mm endoscopic minimally invasive interlaminar decompression can safely and effectively remove the ossification in the spinal canal and achieve adequate decompression in patients with ossified lumbar spinal stenosis.

Pain trajectories over 12 months following conservative care consultation in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate symptom trajectories in chiropractic patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with LSS were recruited from chiropractic clinics and self-reported questionnaires were collected at baseline and 1-year follow-up. Patients received weekly text messages about low back pain (LBP) and leg symptoms for 1 year. Group-based trajectory modelling was performed to identify symptom trajectory groups. The groups were compared based on patient characteristics, LBP and leg pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ).

RESULTS

A total of 90 patients were included in the analysis. A three-group trajectory model was chosen: 'improving' (16%), 'fluctuating/improving' (30%), and 'persistent' (54%). The 'persistent' group had a higher proportion of women [71% (95% CI 57-82%)] than the 'improving' group 29% (95% CI 11-56%), and a higher ODI score at both baseline [34.2 (95% CI 29.7-38.8) vs. 22.8 (16.4-29.1)] and 1-year follow-up [28.1 (95% CI 23.2-33.0) vs. 4.8 (0.1-9.4)]. Similar differences were observed for ZCQ symptom and function scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain symptoms in people with LSS followed distinctly different trajectories. Half of the sample had a pattern of consistently severe symptoms over a year, while the other half either improved rapidly or experienced fluctuating symptoms with some improvement.

Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS) Evidence Review of Surgical Treatments for Lumbar Degenerative Spinal Disease: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Interventional treatment options for the lumbar degenerative spine have undergone a significant amount of innovation over the last decade. As new technologies emerge, along with the surgical specialty expansion, there is no manuscript that utilizes a review of surgical treatments with evidence rankings from multiple specialties, namely, the interventional pain and spine communities. Through the Pacific Spine and Pain Society (PSPS), the purpose of this manuscript is to provide a balanced evidence review of available surgical treatments.

METHODS

The PSPS Research Committee created a working group that performed a comprehensive literature search on available surgical technologies for the treatment of the degenerative spine, utilizing the ranking assessment based on USPSTF (United States Preventative Services Taskforce) and NASS (North American Spine Society) criteria.

RESULTS

The surgical treatments were separated based on disease process, including treatments for degenerative disc disease, spondylolisthesis, and spinal stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is emerging and significant evidence to support multiple approaches to treat the symptomatic lumbar degenerative spine. As new technologies become available, training, education, credentialing, and peer review are essential for optimizing patient safety and successful outcomes.

Preference Sensitive Care and Shared Decision-Making in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Scoping Review

STUDY DESIGN

Scoping review.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to conduct a scoping review exploring the extent to which preference sensitivity has been studied in treatment decisions for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), utilizing shared decision-making (SDM) as a proxy.

BACKGROUND

Preference-sensitive care involves situations where multiple treatment options exist with significant tradeoffs in cost, outcome, recovery time, and quality of life. LSS has gained research focus as a preference-sensitive care scenario.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A scoping review protocol in accordance with "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews" regulations was registered with the Open Science Framework (ID: 9ewup) and conducted across multiple databases from January 2000 to October 2022. Study selection and characterization were performed by 3 independent reviewers and an unbiased moderator.

RESULTS

The search resulted in the inclusion of 16 studies varying in design and sample size, with most published between 2016 and 2021. The studies examined variables related to SDM, patient preferences, surgeon preferences, and decision aids (DAs). The outcomes assessed included treatment choice, patient satisfaction, and patient understanding. Several studies reported that SDM influenced treatment choice and patient satisfaction, while the impact on patient understanding was less clear. DAs were used in some studies to facilitate SDM.

CONCLUSION

The scoping review identified a gap in comprehensive studies analyzing the preference sensitivity of treatment for LSS and the role of DAs. Further research is needed to better understand the impact of patient preferences on treatment decisions and the effectiveness of DAs in LSS care. This review provides a foundation for future research in preference-sensitive care and SDM in the context of lumbar stenosis treatment.

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of a new percutaneous interspinous device: a retrospective multicenter study

PURPOSE

To evaluate safety and efficacy of the novel percutaneous interspinous device (PID) for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS) in 3 different centers.

METHODS

From November 2016 to March 2020, 255 patients (male 125, mean age 71.2 years old range 49-91 years old) with neurogenic claudication, confirmed by electromyography, related to mono or bi-segmental lumbar central canal and/or foraminal stenosis were enrolled in the study. Magnetic resonance (MR) and/or computer tomography (CT), physical exam, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) were performed before and 6 months after the procedure. All treatments were performed under fluoroscopic guidance with local anesthesia and mild sedation. Technical success was defined as correct placement of the Lobster® (Demetrios Medical, Firenze, Italy) PID as demonstrated by computer tomography (CT) performed immediately after treatment; spinoplasty was performed in selected patients.

RESULTS

PID placement was accomplished with a 99.6% success rate (257/258). The one device that was not implanted was due to a spinous process fracture. In 28 patients, more than 1 device was implanted in the same session (max 3 PIDs); 6 patients required a second implant in different session. A total of 172 prophylactic spinoplasties were performed (59.3%). No major complications occurred; 3 device misplacements were successfully treated with percutaneous retrieval and new device deployment. 99.6% of patients experienced clinical improvement.

CONCLUSION

Lobster PID is an effective and safe minimally invasive decompression method for central canal and neural foraminal stenosis when patients are correctly selected.

Predictors of Patient Dissatisfaction after Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

Introduction

Recently, patient satisfaction has gained prominence as a crucial measure for ensuring patient-centered care. Furthermore, patient satisfaction after lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LCS) surgery is an important metric for physician's decision of surgical indication and informed consent to patient. This study aimed to elucidate how patient satisfaction changed after LCS surgery to identify factors that predict patient dissatisfaction.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed time-course data of patients aged ≥40 years who underwent LCS surgery at multiple hospitals. The participants completed the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ) before surgery and then 6 months and 1 year postsurgery. Patient satisfaction was categorized according to the postoperative score of the satisfaction domain of the ZCQ: satisfied, score ≤2.0; moderately satisfied, 2.0< score ≤2.5; and dissatisfied, score >2.5.

Results

The study enrolled 241 patients. Our data indicated a satisfaction rate of around 70% at 6 months and then again 1 year after LCS surgery. Among those who were dissatisfied 6 months after LCS surgery, 47.6% were more satisfied 1 year postsurgery. Furthermore, 86.2% of those who were satisfied 6 months after LCS surgery remained satisfied at 1 year. Multivariable analysis revealed that age (relative risk, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.8) and preoperative score of psychological disorders on the JOABPEQ (relative risk, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.08) were significantly associated with LCS surgery dissatisfaction. In addition, the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the cutoff value for the preoperative score of psychological disorder of the JOABPEQ was estimated at 40 for LCS surgery dissatisfaction.

Conclusions

Age and psychological disorders were identified as significant predictors of dissatisfaction, with a JOABPEQ cutoff value providing potential clinical applicability.

Effects of calcitonin on lumbar spinal stenosis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

There is some controversy about the effects of calcitonin (CT) on lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). This systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the strength of the evidence supporting the use of CT in the treatment of patients with LSS.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We performed an electronic search depicting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) through 4 databases from the date of database creation to January 2023. 3 different researchers conducted independent literature screening, data extractions, and quality assessments. The outcome measures included visual analogue scale (VAS), walking distance, and oswestry disability index (ODI). Meta-analysis and trial sequence analysis (TSA) were carried out using RevMan 5.4, Stata 16.0, and TSA 0.9. GRADE 3.6 was used to evaluate the evidence quality.

RESULTS

We accepted 9 studies with 496 participants. The meta-analysis revealed that CT offered no significant improvement in VAS, walking distance, or ODI in patients with LSS.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that CT has a benefit in patients with LSS, either alone or in combination with other treatments, or depending on the route of administration, according to the systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant RCTs.

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of OLIF and TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically evaluate the difference in clinical efficacy between two surgical approaches, oblique lateral approach and intervertebral foraminal approach, in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

METHODS

English databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, were systematically searched using keywords such as "oblique lumbar interbody fusion" and "transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion." Concurrently, Chinese databases, including CNKI, WanFang data, VIP, and CBM, were also queried using corresponding Chinese terms. The search spanned from January 2014 to February 2024, focusing on published studies in both Chinese and English that compared the clinical efficacy of OLIF and TLIF. The literature screening was conducted by reviewing titles, abstracts, and full texts. Literature meeting the inclusion criteria underwent quality assessment, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical analysis and a meta-analysis of the observational data for both surgical groups were performed using Excel and RevMan 5.4 software. Findings revealed a total of 14 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, encompassing 877 patients. Of these, 414 patients were in the OLIF group, while 463 were in the TLIF group. Meta-analysis of the statistical data revealed that compared to TLIF, OLIF had a shorter average surgical duration (P < 0.05), reduced intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.05), shorter average hospital stay (P < 0.05), better improvement in postoperative VAS scores (P < 0.05), superior enhancement in postoperative ODI scores (P < 0.05), more effective restoration of disc height (P < 0.05), and better correction of lumbar lordosis (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between OLIF and TLIF in terms of the incidence of surgical complications (P > 0.05) and fusion rates (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

When treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, OLIF demonstrates significant advantages over TLIF in terms of shorter surgical duration, reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stay, superior improvement in postoperative VAS and ODI scores, better restoration of disc height, and more effective correction of lumbar lordosis.

A propensity-matched study of patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis opting for surgery versus not

Introduction

Although most surgeons treating patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) believe that surgical treatment is superior to conservative measures, systematics reviews have concluded that no solid evidence support this.

Research question

To compare change at 1-year of walking ability, health-related quality of life, leg and back pain in patients with symptomatic LSS referred to a spine surgery clinic who opted for surgery and those who did not.

Material and methods

The study included 149 operated and 149 non-operated patients seen by spine surgeons and diagnosed with LSS. The non-operated patients were propensity-matched to a cohort retrieved from the Danish national spine registry. Matching was done on demographics and baseline outcome measures. The outcomes was walking improvement measured by item 4 of the Oswestry Disability Index, EQ-5D-3L, global assessment (GA) of back/leg pain, back and leg pain on the Visual Analogue Scale and the Short Form 36 transition item 2.

Results

Less than half of the non-operated reached MCID on EQ-5D-3L, VAS pain legs or VAS pain back where 2/3 of the operated did. The largest difference was VAS back pain where 27.5% of the non-operated reached an MCID of 12 points compared to 71.8% in the operated group.

Discussion and conclusion

Surgical treated patients improved better than non-operated on all outcome measures. However, further research is required to compare the effectiveness of surgical decompression with non-operative care for LSS patients.

Effects of nurses-led multidisciplinary-based psychological management in spinal surgery: a retrospective, propensity-score-matching comparative study

BACKGROUND

Patients in spine surgery often have emotional disorders which is caused by multi-factors. Therefore, a multidisciplinary and multimodal intervention program is required to improve emotional disorders during the perioperative period. However, related studies were rare. This study aimed to confirm that the multidisciplinary-based psychological management leading by nurses was effective in treating emotional disorders and show the assignments of the members of the multidisciplinary team with the orientations of nurses.

DESIGN

A retrospective, comparative study.

METHOD

This study was a retrospective cohort research and compared the results between the intervention group and control group using the Huaxi Emotional Distress Index (HEI) which was used to evaluate emotional disorders. The intervention group consisted of patients who underwent surgery between January 2018 and December 2020 after psychological management was implemented. The control group consisted of patients with regular care who underwent surgery between January 2015 and December 2017. To improve comparability between the two groups, baseline data from the recruited patients were analyzed using propensity-score-matching (PSM) based on age, sex, marital status, education, and disease region.

RESULTS

A total of 539 (11.5%) people developed emotional disorders, of which 319 (6.8%), 151 (3.2%) and 69 (1.5%) had mild, moderate mood and severe emotional disorders, respectively. 2107 pairs of patients were matched after PSM. Scores of HEI in the intervention group were heightened compared with those in the control group (P<0.001) after matching. Moreover, the incidence of emotional disorders in patients decreased after implementing psychological management (P = 0.001). The severity of emotional disorders was alleviated with statistical significance as well (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses-led Multidisciplinary-Based psychological management was able to reduce the incidence of emotional disorders and improve the severity of these in spine surgery patients.

The Impact of Frailty on Surgical Outcome of Patients with Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

Introduction

Frailty is an important factor in surgical outcomes. The current study aimed to evaluate the effect of preoperative frailty on postoperative outcomes in older patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS).

Methods

We retrospectively examined 209 patients aged ≥65 years who underwent surgery for LSCS. Health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) tools, including the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ), Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ), and Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), were used in the assessment conducted before surgery and at 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Frailty was categorized based on the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11). Patients with mFI-11 of 0, <0.21, and >0.21 were classified under the robust (R), pre-frailty (P), and frailty (F) groups, respectively.

Results

According to the mFI-11, 24, 138, and 47 patients were included in the R, P, and F groups, respectively. Regarding preoperative radiographic parameters, there was a remarkable increase in the sagittal vertical axis and a significant decrease in the development of lumbar lordosis with frailty progression. The preoperative scores of RDQ and ZCQ, and lumbar function, walking ability, social life, and psychological disorder domain scores of JOABPEQ differed significantly among these groups. The frequency of revision surgery was not higher in the F group than in the other groups. After adjustment for factors have shown different distributions among the three groups, the frequency of effective surgical cases did not show a clear trend among the three groups in all domains of the JOABPEQ.

Conclusions

The preoperative HRQOL scores and the radiographic parameters of patients with LSCS worsened with frailty severity. However, frailty did not affect the rate of revision surgery and surgical efficacy in patients with LSCS. Although this study has limitations, our findings indicated that even LSCS patients with frailty can be considered for surgery if they have an indication for LSCS surgery.

Recovery pattern after decompression of central lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Detailed preoperative information is associated with superior outcomes. We aimed to describe the recovery pattern after decompression of central lumbar spinal stenosis (CLSS).

METHODS

50 patients aged 51-85 years who underwent decompression without fusion due to CLSS were followed from before to after surgery (post-op day 1, 7, and 14). Back and leg pain were evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS; 0 = no pain 0, 10 = worst pain) and quality of life using the EuroQol-5D index (0 = death, 1 = best), and EQ-5D-visual analogue scale (VAS; 0 = worst, 100 = best).

RESULTS

NRS leg pain was reduced from preoperative to first postoperative day by 5.2 (6.1, 4.3) (mean (95%CI)], and NRS back pain from postoperative day 1-7 by 0.6 (1.2, 0.03) and from day 7 to 14 by 0.7 (1.3, 0.2)]. In contrast, EQ-5D index increased from preoperative to first postoperative day by 0.09 (0.06, 0.13) and from day 1 to 7 by 0.05 (0.02,0.08), and EQ-5D VAS from preoperative to first postoperative day by 13.7 (9.1, 18.3) and from day 1 to 7 by 6.0 (2.0, 10.0). After two weeks, 51% of the patients had improved above the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in back pain and 71% in leg pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients scheduled for decompression due to CLSS should be informed that improvement in leg pain and quality of life in general can be expected within one day of surgery, that quality of life improves a little further in the first postoperative week, and that back pain improves in the first 2 postoperative weeks. In most patients, decompression without fusion due to CLSS seems to achieve clinically relevant improvement within 2 weeks.

Obesity increases the odds of intervertebral disc herniation and spinal stenosis; an MRI study of 1634 low back pain patients

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to examine the relationships between BMI and intervertebral disc degeneration (DD), disc herniation (DH) and spinal stenosis (SS) using a large, prospectively recruited and heterogeneous patient population.

METHODS

Patients were recruited through the European Genodisc Study. An experienced radiologist scored MRI images for DD, DH and SS. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were used to model the relationship between these variables and BMI with adjustment for patient and MRI confounders.

RESULTS

We analysed 1684 patients with a mean age of 51 years and BMI of 27.2 kg/m2.
The mean DD score was 2.6 (out of 5) with greater DD severity with increasing age (R2 = 0.44). In the fully adjusted model, a 10-year increase in age and a 5 kg/m2 increase in BMI were associated, respectively, with a 0.31-unit [95% CI 0.29,0.34] and 0.04-unit [CI 0.01,0.07] increase in degeneration. Age (OR 1.23 [CI 1.06,1.43]) and BMI (OR 2.60 [CI 2.28,2.96]) were positively associated with SS. For DH, age was a negative predictor (OR 0.70 [CI 0.64,0.76]) but for BMI (OR 1.19 [CI 1.07,1.33]), the association was positive. BMI was the strongest predictor of all three features in the upper lumbar spine.

CONCLUSIONS

While an increase in BMI was associated with only a slight increase in DD, it was a stronger predictor for DH and SS, particularly in the upper lumbar discs, suggesting weight loss could be a useful strategy for helping prevent disorders associated with these pathologies.

A review of electromyography techniques of the cervical paraspinal muscles

Electrodiagnosis for cervical radiculopathy often involves exploration of the cervical paraspinal muscles. Accurate and reproducible results require a technique with specific anatomic localization, direction of insertion, extent of insertion, scoring system for insertion, and criteria for determining abnormality. We sought to understand if a published technique met these criteria. A Medline search found 39 articles with original research and 10 review articles involving the cervical paraspinals. A library search found 19 textbooks since 2000, but 9 were not available. Only two studies were specific to the question. Neither had reproducible techniques and they contradicted each other. Studies in which the paraspinals were used for comparison or inclusion did not provide any specific technique. The review articles and textbooks typically met none of our criteria and the few that discussed technique at all provided no reproducible methods. Despite 80 years of electrodiagnostic testing, there is no useful, reproducible technique for exploring the cervical paraspinal muscles. Yet such a paraspinal mapping technique has proven invaluable in the lumbar region. For cervical electromyography to be of value, the next step is to understand the anatomy and propose a reproducible technique. Subsequent research will determine whether the neck muscles are helpful in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. The absence of a valid reproducible cervical paraspinal technique impedes clinical and scientific understanding of cervical radiculopathy.

1. Lumbosacral radicular pain

INTRODUCTION

Patients suffering lumbosacral radicular pain report radiating pain in one or more lumbar or sacral dermatomes. In the general population, low back pain with leg pain extending below the knee has an annual prevalence that varies from 9.9% to 25%.

METHODS

The literature on the diagnosis and treatment of lumbosacral radicular pain was reviewed and summarized.

RESULTS

Although a patient's history, the pain distribution pattern, and clinical examination may yield a presumptive diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain, additional clinical tests may be required. Medical imaging studies can demonstrate or exclude specific underlying pathologies and identify nerve root irritation, while selective diagnostic nerve root blocks can be used to confirm the affected level(s). In subacute lumbosacral radicular pain, transforaminal corticosteroid administration provides short-term pain relief and improves mobility. In chronic lumbosacral radicular pain, pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) treatment adjacent to the spinal ganglion (DRG) can provide pain relief for a longer period in well-selected patients. In cases of refractory pain, epidural adhesiolysis and spinal cord stimulation can be considered in experienced centers.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnosis of lumbosacral radicular pain is based on a combination of history, clinical examination, and additional investigations. Epidural steroids can be considered for subacute lumbosacral radicular pain. In chronic lumbosacral radicular pain, PRF adjacent to the DRG is recommended. SCS and epidural adhesiolysis can be considered for cases of refractory pain in specialized centers.

Cerebrospinal Fluid Lysophosphatidylcholine Species for Distinguishing Narrowing of the Lumbar Spine

BACKGROUND

Reoperation, sometimes multiple, is common with progressively worse outcomes in patients with degenerative lumbar spine diseases. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), a precursor of lysophosphatidic acid, in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a possible biomarker for neuropathic pain and discriminating neuropathic pain caused by lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) from other etiologies. This study aimed to explore this possible use of LPC species in the CSF.

METHODS

Patients with LSCS (n = 137) and persistent spinal pain syndrome (n = 22) were subjected in this multi-site observational study. The CSF was collected by lumbar puncture. Using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, we measured 6 LPC species, (16:0), (18:0), (18:1), (18:2), (20:4), and (22:6), in the CSF. We compared the LPC values between the groups and determined the cutoff levels that could efficiently discriminate the groups with high accuracy.

RESULTS

The levels of all measured LPC species were significantly higher in the LSCS group than the persistent spinal pain syndrome group. Four LPC species demonstrated more than 0.80 area under the curve obtained from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Although the specificity of cutoff levels for the 6 LPC species was low to moderate, their sensitivity was consistently high.

CONCLUSIONS

The existing diagnostic protocols combining physical examinations and morphological imaging studies for lumbar spinal pain have limited sensitivity. Measuring LPC species in the CSF is a promising objective laboratory test and could be suitable for detecting the presence of lumbar spinal stenosis and can help indications for surgery.

A neural network model for detection and classification of lumbar spinal stenosis on MRI

OBJECTIVES

To develop a three-stage convolutional neural network (CNN) approach to segment anatomical structures, classify the presence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) for all 3 stenosis types: central, lateral recess and foraminal and assess its severity on spine MRI and to demonstrate its efficacy as an accurate and consistent diagnostic tool.

METHODS

The three-stage model was trained on 1635 annotated lumbar spine MRI studies consisting of T2-weighted sagittal and axial planes at each vertebral level. Accuracy of the model was evaluated on an external validation set of 150 MRI studies graded on a scale of absent, mild, moderate or severe by a panel of 7 radiologists. The reference standard for all types was determined by majority voting and in case of disagreement, adjudicated by an external radiologist. The radiologists' diagnoses were then compared to the diagnoses of the model.

RESULTS

The model showed comparable performance to the radiologist average both in terms of the determination of presence/absence of LSS as well as severity classification, for all 3 stenosis types. In the case of central canal stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity and AUROC of the CNN were (0.971, 0.864, 0.963) for binary (presence/absence) classification compared to the radiologist average of (0.786, 0.899, 0.842). For lateral recess stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity and AUROC of the CNN were (0.853, 0.787, 0.907) compared to the radiologist average of (0.713, 0.898, 805). For foraminal stenosis, the sensitivity, specificity and AUROC of the CNN were (0.942, 0.844, 0.950) compared to the radiologist average of (0.879, 0.877, 0.878). Multi-class severity classifications showed similarly comparable statistics.

CONCLUSIONS

The CNN showed comparable performance to radiologist subspecialists for the detection and classification of LSS. The integration of neural network models in the detection of LSS could bring higher accuracy, efficiency, consistency, and post-hoc interpretability in diagnostic practices.

Effectiveness of transcranial direct current stimulation in chronic pain and neurogenic claudication related to lumbar spinal stenosis

OBJECTIVES

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising non-invasive brain stimulation technique for treating chronic pain, yet its effectiveness in chronic lower extremity pain due to lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) has not been studied. This research aimed to investigate the impact of tDCS on pain, walking capacity, functional status, and quality of life in LSS patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study, 32 LSS patients received either real or sham tDCS over the motor cortex contralateral to the patient's painful lower extremity for 10 consecutive weekdays (10 sessions). Evaluations were conducted at baseline, post-session, and 1-3 months later. The pain was evaluated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), walking duration and distance by Treadmill Walking Test, functional status by Modified Oswestry Disability Questionnaire (MODQ) and quality of life by Short Form-36 (SF-36).

RESULTS

In-group comparisons, active tDCS showed sustained analgesic effects for 3-month post-treatment, distinct from sham. After the final session, active group exhibited significantly better asymptomatic walking distance and duration. Active stimulation led to notably lower MOLBDQ scores after 1 month. Significant improvements in SF-36 subscales were seen after 3 months, especially in pain, physical functioning, and general health. Positive tDCS effects on pain, claudication, and some quality of life aspects were evident at 3 months, while functional status improvements were mainly limited to 1 month.

CONCLUSION

tDCS shows potential as a safe, non-invasive technique for alleviating chronic LSS-related pain, enhancing mobility, functionality, and quality of life.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03958526.