1
|
Pennington Z, Mikula AL, Lakomkin N, Martini M, Pinter ZW, Shafi M, Hamouda A, Bydon M, Clarke MJ, Freedman BA, Krauss WE, Nassr AN, Sebastian AS, Fogelson JL, Elder BD. Bone Quality as Measured by Hounsfield Units More Accurately Predicts Proximal Junctional Kyphosis than Vertebral Bone Quality Following Long-Segment Thoracolumbar Fusion. World Neurosurg 2024; 186:e584-e592. [PMID: 38588791 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the prognostic power of Hounsfield units (HU) and Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) score for predicting proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) following long-segment thoracolumbar fusion to the upper thoracic spine (T1-T6). METHODS Vertebral bone quality around the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) was measured using HU on preoperative CT and VBQ on preoperative MRI. Spinopelvic parameters were also categorized according to the Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab classification. Univariable analysis to identify predictors of the occurrence of PJK and survival analyses with Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression were performed to identify predictors of time to PJK (defined as ≥10° change in Cobb angle of UIV+2 and UIV). Sensitivity analyses showed thresholds of HU < 164 and VBQ > 2.7 to be most predictive for PJK. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (mean age 66.0 ± 7.0 years; 27.6% male) were identified, of whom 15 suffered PJK. Significant predictors of PJK were high postoperative pelvic tilt (P = 0.038), high postoperative T1-pelvic angle (P = 0.041), and high postoperative PI-LL mismatch (P = 0.028). On survival analyses, bone quality, as assessed by the average HU of the UIV and UIV+1 was the only significant predictor of time to PJK (odds ratio [OR] 3.053; 95% CI 1.032-9.032; P = 0.044). VBQ measured using the UIV, UIV+1, UIV+2, and UIV-1 vertebrae approached, but did not reach significance (OR 2.913; 95% CI 0.797-10.646; P = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS In larger cohorts, VBQ may prove to be a significant predictor of PJK following long-segment thoracolumbar fusion. However, Hounsfield units on CT have greater predictive power, suggesting preoperative workup for long-segment thoracolumbar fusion benefits from computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging alone to identify those at increased risk of PJK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
| | - Anthony L Mikula
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nikita Lakomkin
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michael Martini
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Zachariah W Pinter
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mahnoor Shafi
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Mohamad Bydon
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Michelle J Clarke
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brett A Freedman
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - William E Krauss
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ahmad N Nassr
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Arjun S Sebastian
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Jeremy L Fogelson
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Benjamin D Elder
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Saad M, Tonetti J, Kerschbaumer G, Boudissa M. Navigated pedicle screw insertion with the Surgivisio system: Malposition rate and risk factors - about 648 screws. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2024:103899. [PMID: 38677474 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pedicle screw malposition rates vary greatly in scientific literature depending on the chosen criteria. Different techniques have been developed to lower the risk of screw malposition. Our primary objective is to evaluate the malposition rate associated with the use of the Surgivisio navigation system and to identify risk factors for screw malposition. The secondary objectives are to assess operating time and radiation data. MATERIALS AND METHODS We performed a monocentric retrospective consecutive case series. All patients operated for pedicle screw implantation using the Surgivisio system between September 2017 and June 2020 were included. Screw positioning was evaluated on postoperative CT scans using Heary and Gertzbein classifications. Thirteen potential risk factors for screw malposition were hypothesized and tested with a univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS Six hundred and forty-eight screws could be evaluated in 97 patients. Our study reported a 92.4% satisfactory screw implantation rate with a mean operative time per screw of 14.5±6.7minutes and a patient effective dose of 0.47±0.31 mSv per screw. One screw was neurotoxic and required an early revision (0.15%). Three risk factors for screw malposition have been identified in a multivariate analysis: female gender (OR=2.13 [1.11; 4], p=0.0219), an implantation level above D10 (OR=2.17 [1.13; 4.16], p=0.0197), and an "open" surgery (as opposed to percutaneous) (OR=3.47 [1.83; 6.56], p=0.0002). CONCLUSION Pedicle screw malposition rate and operative time with the Surgivisio navigation system are comparable with those reported in scientific literature. We theorized that intraoperative patient reference displacement could be a major cause of navigation failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxime Saad
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Nord, CHU de Grenoble, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700 La Tronche, France; Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.
| | - Jérôme Tonetti
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Nord, CHU de Grenoble, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700 La Tronche, France; Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France; CNRS UMR 5525, laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, université Grenoble-Alpes, pavillon Taillefer, 38700 La Tronche, France
| | - Gaël Kerschbaumer
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Nord, CHU de Grenoble, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700 La Tronche, France; Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Mehdi Boudissa
- Service de chirurgie orthopédique et traumatologique, hôpital Nord, CHU de Grenoble, boulevard de la Chantourne, 38700 La Tronche, France; Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France; CNRS UMR 5525, laboratoire TIMC-IMAG, université Grenoble-Alpes, pavillon Taillefer, 38700 La Tronche, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang CC, Fitts J, Huie D, Bhowmick DA, Abd-El-Barr MM. Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions-A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2122. [PMID: 38610887 PMCID: PMC11012719 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13072122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2024] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery. As scientific evidence accumulates, the efficacy and safety of cervical endoscopic spine surgery are continually affirmed. Both anterior and posterior endoscopic approaches have surfaced as viable alternative treatments for various cervical spine pathologies. Newer techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted fusion, the anterior transcorporeal approach, and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression, have been developed to enhance clinical outcomes and broaden surgical indications. Despite its advantages, this approach faces challenges, including a steep learning curve, increased radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients, and a relative limitation in addressing multi-level pathologies. However, the future of cervical endoscopic spine surgery is promising, with potential enhancements in clinical outcomes and safety on the horizon. This progress is fueled by integrating advanced imaging and navigation technologies, applying regional anesthesia for improved and facilitated postoperative recovery, and incorporating cutting-edge technologies, such as augmented reality. With these advancements, cervical endoscopic spine surgery is poised to broaden its scope in treating cervical spine pathologies while maintaining the benefits of minimized tissue damage and rapid recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chuan-Ching Huang
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei 100, Taiwan
| | - Jamal Fitts
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - David Huie
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Deb A. Bhowmick
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr
- Division of Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Hospital, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sarikonda A, Tecce E, Leibold A, Mansoor Ali D, Thalheimer S, Heller J, Prasad S, Sharan A, Jallo J, Harrop J, Vaccaro AR, Sivaganesan A. What is the Marginal Cost of Using Robot Assistance or Navigation for Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion? A Time-Driven Activity-Based Cost Analysis. Neurosurgery 2024:00006123-990000000-01078. [PMID: 38465927 DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Our primary objective was to compare the marginal intraoperative cost of 3 different methods for pedicle screw placement as part of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs). Specifically, we used time-driven activity-based costing to compare costs between robot-assisted TLIF (RA-TLIF), TLIF with intraoperative navigation (ION-TLIF), and freehand (non-navigated, nonrobotic) TLIF. METHODS Total cost was divided into direct and indirect costs. We identified all instances of RA-TLIF (n = 20), ION-TLIF (n = 59), and freehand TLIF (n = 233) from 2020 to 2022 at our institution. Software was developed to automate the extraction of all intraoperatively used personnel and material resources from the electronic medical record. Total costs were determined through a combination of direct observation, electronic medical record extraction, and interdepartmental collaboration (business operations, sterile processing, pharmacy, and plant operation departments). Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to compare costs between TLIF modalities, accounting for patient-specific factors as well as number of levels fused, surgeon, and hospital site. RESULTS The average total intraoperative cost per case for the RA-TLIF, ION-TLIF, and freehand TLIF cohorts was $24 838 ± $10 748, $15 991 ± $6254, and $14 498 ± $6580, respectively. Regression analysis revealed that RA-TLIF had significantly higher intraoperative cost compared with both ION-TLIF (β-coefficient: $7383 ± $1575, P < .001) and freehand TLIF (β-coefficient: $8182 ± $1523, P < .001). These cost differences were primarily driven by supply cost. However, there were no significant differences in intraoperative cost between ION-TLIF and freehand TLIF (P = .32). CONCLUSION We demonstrate a novel use of time-driven activity-based costing methodology to compare different modalities for executing the same type of lumbar fusion procedure. RA-TLIF entails significantly higher supply cost when compared with other modalities, which explains its association with higher total intraoperative cost. The use of ION, however, does not add extra expense compared with freehand TLIF when accounting for confounders. This might have implications as surgeons and hospitals move toward bundled payments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Advith Sarikonda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Eric Tecce
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adam Leibold
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Daniyal Mansoor Ali
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Sara Thalheimer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Joshua Heller
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Srinivas Prasad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ashwini Sharan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jack Jallo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - James Harrop
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander R Vaccaro
- Rothman Orthopedic Institute, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Ahilan Sivaganesan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Thomas Jefferson University and Jefferson Hospital for Neuroscience, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee JS, Son DW, Lee SH, Lee JH, Kim YH, Lee SW, Oh BK, Sung SK, Song GS, Yi S. Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: Role in Training the Next Generation of Spine Surgeons. Neurospine 2024; 21:116-127. [PMID: 38569638 PMCID: PMC10992654 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448006.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the degree of interest in robot-assisted spine surgery (RASS) among residents and to investigate the learning curve for beginners performing robotic surgery. METHODS We conducted a survey to assess awareness and interest in RASS among young neurosurgery residents. Subsequently, we offered a hands-on training program using a dummy to educate one resident. After completing the program, the trained resident performed spinal fusion surgery with robotic assistance under the supervision of a mentor. The clinical outcomes and learning curve associated with robotic surgery were then analyzed. RESULTS Neurosurgical residents had limited opportunities to participate in spinal surgery during their training. Despite this, there was a significant interest in the emerging field of robotic surgery. A trained resident performed RASS under the supervision of a senior surgeon. A total of 166 screw insertions were attempted in 28 patients, with 2 screws failing due to skiving. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification, 85.54% of the screws were rated as grade A, 11.58% as grade B, 0.6% as grade C, and 1.2% as grade D. The clinical acceptance rate was approximately 96.99%, which is comparable to the results reported by senior experts and time per screw statistically significantly decreased as experience was gained. CONCLUSION RASS can be performed with high accuracy within a relatively short timeframe, if residents receive adequate training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Seok Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Dong Wuk Son
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Su Hun Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jong Hyeok Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Young Ha Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Sang Weon Lee
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Bu Kwang Oh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Soon Ki Sung
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Geun Sung Song
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Yangsan, Korea
- Department of Neurosurgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Seong Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Spine and Spinal Cord Institute, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vadalà G, Papalia GF, Russo F, Brigato P, Ambrosio L, Papalia R, Denaro V. Intraoperative Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Navigation Versus 2-Dimensional Fluoroscopy in Single-Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Comparative Analysis. Neurospine 2024; 21:76-82. [PMID: 38569632 PMCID: PMC10992660 DOI: 10.14245/ns.2347106.553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Several studies have advocated for the higher accuracy of transpedicular screw placement under cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) compared to conventional 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy. The superiority of navigation systems in perioperative and postoperative outcomes remains a topic of debate. This study aimed to compare operative time, screw placement time and accuracy, total radiation dose, perioperative and postoperative outcomes in patients who underwent transpedicular screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) using intraoperative CBCT navigation versus 2D fluoroscopy. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients affected by single-level DLS who underwent posterior lumbar instrumentation with transpedicular screw fixation using surgical CBCT navigation (NV group) or 2D fluoroscopy-assisted freehand technique (FH group). Demographics, screw placement time and accuracy, operative time, total radiation dose, intraoperative blood loss, screw revision rate, complications, and length of stay (LOS) were assessed. RESULTS The study included a total of 30 patients (NV group: n = 15; FH group: n = 15). The mean screw placement time, operative time, and LOS were significantly reduced in the NV group compared to the FH group (p < 0.05). The total radiation dose was significantly higher in the NV group (p < 0.0001). No significant difference was found in terms of blood loss and postoperative complications. CONCLUSION This study suggests that intraoperative CBCT-navigated single-level lumbar transpedicular screw fixation is superior in terms of mean screw placement time, operative time, and LOS compared to 2D fluoroscopy, despite a higher intraoperative radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Vadalà
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Francesco Papalia
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Russo
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Brigato
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Ambrosio
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Rocco Papalia
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
- Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Denaro
- Operative Research Unit of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Via Alvaro del Portillo, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kalbas Y, Hoch Y, Klingebiel FKL, Klee O, Cester D, Halvachizadeh S, Berk T, Wanner GA, Pfeifer R, Pape HC, Hasler RM. 3D-navigation for SI screw fixation - How does it affect radiation exposure for patients and medical personnel? Injury 2024; 55:111214. [PMID: 38029680 DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2023.111214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 3D-navigation for percutaneous sacroiliac (SI) screw fixation is becoming increasingly common and several studies report great advantages of this technology. However, there is still limited clinical evidence on the efficacy regarding radiation exposure for patient and personnel. METHODS This is a retrospective, single-center cohort study. All patients who underwent percutaneous sacroiliac screw fixation for an injury of the posterior pelvic ring from 2014 to 2021 were screened. Inclusion criteria were: conclusive radiation dosage reports, signed informed consent, a twelve month follow up and a complete data set. Patients were stratified in two groups (3D-navigation (Group 3D-N) vs. control (Group F)) based on the imaging modality used. Primary outcomes were radiation exposure for patient and personnel. Secondary outcomes were reoperations, complications, and intraoperative precision. RESULTS Of 392 patients screened, 174 patients (3D-N: n = 50, F: n = 124) could be included for final analysis. We noted a significant reduction of the dose corresponding to potential radiation exposure for medical personnel (-15.3 mGy, 95 %CI: -2.1 to -28.5, p = 0.0232), but also a significant increase of the dose quantifying radiation exposure for patients (+77.0 mGy, 95 %CI: +53.3 to +100.6, p < 0.0001), when using navigation. In addition, the rate of radiographic malplacement was significantly reduced (F: 11.3% vs. 3D-N: 0 %, p = 0.0113) despite a substantial increase in transsacral screw placement (F: 19.4% vs. 3D-N: 76 %). CONCLUSION Our data clearly suggests that the use of 3D-navigation for percutaneous SI screw fixation decreases radiation exposure for medical personnel, while increasing radiation exposure for patients. Furthermore, intraoperative precision is improved, even in more challenging operations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannik Kalbas
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Yannis Hoch
- Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Felix Karl-Ludwig Klingebiel
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Octavia Klee
- Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Davide Cester
- University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sascha Halvachizadeh
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Till Berk
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Guido A Wanner
- Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Center for Spine Surgery and Trauma Surgery, Bethanien Hospital, Toblerstr. 51 8044 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Roman Pfeifer
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hans-Christoph Pape
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Harald-Tscherne Laboratory for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Rebecca Maria Hasler
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Ramistr. 100 8091 Zurich, Switzerland; Prodorso Center for Spine Medicine, Walchestr. 15 CH-8006 Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li J, Boeyer ME, Hoernschemeyer DG, Leary E. Automated extraction of biplanar stereo-radiographic image measurements: Mizzou 3D SPinE. Spine Deform 2024; 12:119-124. [PMID: 37702985 DOI: 10.1007/s43390-023-00761-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although several studies have reported on the application of biplanar stereo-radiographic technology in pediatric clinical practice, few have performed large-scale analyses. The manual extraction of these types of data is time-consuming, which often precludes physicians and scientists from effectively utilizing these valuable measurements. To fill the critical gap between clinical assessments and large-scale evidence-based research, we have addressed one of the primary hurdles in using data derived from these types of imaging modalities in pediatric clinical practice by developing an application to automatically transcribe and aggregate three-dimensional measurements in a manner that facilitates statistical analyses. METHODS Mizzou 3D SPinE was developed using R software; the application, instructions, and process were beta tested with four separate testers. We compared 1309 manually compiled three-dimensional deformity measurements derived from thirty-five biplanar three-dimensional reconstructions (image sets) from ten pediatric patients to those derived from Mizzou 3D SPinE. We assessed the difference between manually entered values and extracted values using a Fisher's exact test. RESULTS Mizzou 3D SPinE significantly reduced the duration of data entry (95.8%) while retaining 100% accuracy. Manually compiled data resulted in an error rate of 1.58%, however, the magnitude of errors ranged from 5.97 to 2681.82% significantly increased the transcription accuracy (p value < 0.0001) while also significantly reducing transcription time (0.33 vs. 8.08 min). CONCLUSION Mizzou 3D SPinE is an essential component in improving evidence-based patient care by allowing clinicians and scientists to quickly compile three-dimensional data at regular intervals in an automated, efficient manner without transcription errors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinpu Li
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, 1100 Virginia Ave, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA
- Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
| | - Melanie E Boeyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, 1100 Virginia Ave, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA
| | - Daniel G Hoernschemeyer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, 1100 Virginia Ave, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA
| | - Emily Leary
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, 1100 Virginia Ave, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
- Thompson Laboratory for Regenerative Orthopaedics, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beisemann N, Gierse J, Mandelka E, Hassel F, Grützner PA, Franke J, Vetter SY. Radiation exposure for pedicle screw placement with three different navigation system and imaging combinations in a sawbone model. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2023; 24:752. [PMID: 37742007 PMCID: PMC10517448 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-023-06880-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown that pedicle screw placement using navigation can potentially reduce radiation exposure of surgical personnel compared to conventional methods. Spinal navigation is based on an interaction of a navigation software and 3D imaging. The 3D image data can be acquired using different imaging modalities such as iCT and CBCT. These imaging modalities vary regarding acquisition technique and field of view. The current literature varies greatly in study design, in form of dose registration, as well as navigation systems and imaging modalities analyzed. Therefore, the aim of this study was a standardized comparison of three navigation and imaging system combinations in an experimental setting in an artificial spine model. METHODS In this experimental study dorsal instrumentation of the thoracolumbar spine was performed using three imaging/navigation system combinations. The system combinations applied were the iCT/Curve, cCBCT/Pulse and oCBCT/StealthStation. Referencing scans were obtained with each imaging modality and served as basis for the respective navigation system. In each group 10 artificial spine models received bilateral dorsal instrumentation from T11-S1. 2 referencing and control scans were acquired with the CBCTs, since their field of view could only depict up to five vertebrae in one scan. The field of view of the iCT enabled the depiction of T11-S1 in one scan. After instrumentation the region of interest was scanned again for evaluation of the screw position, therefore only one referencing and one control scan were obtained. Two dose meters were installed in a spine bed ventral of L1 and S1. The dose measurements in each location and in total were analyzed for each system combination. Time demand regarding screw placement was also assessed for all system combinations. RESULTS The mean radiation dose in the iCT group measured 1,6 ± 1,1 mGy. In the cCBCT group the mean was 3,6 ± 0,3 mGy and in the oCBCT group 10,3 ± 5,7 mGy were measured. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) showed a significant (p < 0.0001) difference between the three groups. The multiple comparisions by the Kruskall-Wallis test showed no significant difference for the comparison of iCT and cCBCT (p1 = 0,13). Significant differences were found for the direct comparison of iCT and oCBCT (p2 < 0,0001), as well as cCBCT and oCBCT (p3 = 0,02). Statistical analysis showed that significantly (iCT vs. oCBCT p = 0,0434; cCBCT vs. oCBCT p = 0,0083) less time was needed for oCBCT based navigated pedicle screw placement compared to the other system combinations (iCT vs. cCBCT p = 0,871). CONCLUSION Under standardized conditions oCBCT navigation demanded twice as much radiation as the cCBCT for the same number of scans, while the radiation exposure measured for the iCT and cCBCT for one scan was comparable. Yet, time effort was significantly less for oCBCT based navigation. However, for transferability into clinical practice additional studies should follow evaluating parameters regarding feasibility and clinical outcome under standardized conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Beisemann
- Research Group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), BG Klinik (BG Trauma Center) Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Jula Gierse
- Research Group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), BG Klinik (BG Trauma Center) Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Eric Mandelka
- Research Group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), BG Klinik (BG Trauma Center) Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Frank Hassel
- Department of Spine Surgery, Loretto Hospital, Mercystrasse 6, 79100, Freiburg Im Breisgau, Germany
| | - Paul A Grützner
- Research Group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), BG Klinik (BG Trauma Center) Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Jochen Franke
- Research Group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), BG Klinik (BG Trauma Center) Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - Sven Y Vetter
- Research Group Medical Imaging and Navigation in Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery (MINTOS), BG Klinik (BG Trauma Center) Ludwigshafen, Ludwig-Guttmann-Strasse 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Diaz-Aguilar LD, Brown NJ, Bui N, Alvandi B, Pennington Z, Gendreau J, Jeswani SP, Pham MH, Santiago-Dieppa DR, Nguyen AD. The use of robot-assisted surgery for the unstable traumatic spine: A retrospective cohort study. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2023; 15:100234. [PMID: 37564913 PMCID: PMC10410240 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
Background Robotic assistance has been shown to increase instrumentation placement accuracy in open and minimally invasive spinal fusion. These gains have been achieved without increases in operative times, blood loss, or hospitalization duration. However, most work has been done in the degenerative population and little is known of the utility of robotic assistance when applied to spinal trauma. This is largely due to the uncertainty stemming from the disruption of normal anatomy by the traumatic injury. Since the robot depends upon registration for instrumentation guidance according to the fiducials it uses, trauma can introduce unique challenges. The present study sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of robotic assistance in a consecutive cohort of spine trauma patients. Methods All patients with Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity Scale (TLICS) >4 who underwent robot-assisted spinal fusion using the Globus ExcelsiusGPS at a single tertiary care center for trauma between 2020 and 2022 were identified. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were collected and analyzed; the primary endpoints were operative time, fluoroscopy time, estimated blood loss, postoperative complications, admission time, and 90-day readmission rate. The paired t-test was used to compare differences between mean values when looking at the number of surgical levels. Results Forty-two patients undergoing robot-assisted spinal surgery were included (mean age 61.3±17.1 year; 47% female. Patients were stratified by the number of operative levels, 2 (n = 10), 3-4 (n = 11), 5 to 6 (n = 13), or >6 (n = 8). There appeared to be a positive correlation between number of levels instrumented and odds of postoperative complications, admission duration, fluoroscopy time, and estimated blood loss. There were no instances of screw malposition or breach. Conclusions This initial experience suggests robotic assistance can be safely employed in the spine trauma population. Additional experiences in larger patient populations are necessary to delineate those traumatic pathologies most amenable to robotic assistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nolan J. Brown
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, 92868 USA
| | - Nicholas Bui
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA, 92868 USA
| | - Bejan Alvandi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 60611 USA
| | - Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55905 USA
| | - Julian Gendreau
- Johns Hopkins Whiting School of Engineering, Baltimore, MD, 21205 USA
| | - Sunil P. Jeswani
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093 USA
| | - Martin H. Pham
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093 USA
| | | | - Andrew D. Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 92093 USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Doria-Medina R, Hubbe U, Scholz C, Sircar R, Brönner J, Hoedlmoser H, Klingler JH. Free-Hand MIS TLIF without 3D Navigation-How to Achieve Low Radiation Exposure for Both Surgeon and Patient. J Clin Med 2023; 12:5125. [PMID: 37568527 PMCID: PMC10419541 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12155125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) is one of the most frequently performed spinal fusion techniques, and this minimally invasive (MIS) approach has advantages over the traditional open approach. A drawback is the higher radiation exposure for the surgeon when conventional fluoroscopy (2D-fluoroscopy) is used. While computer-assisted navigation (CAN) reduce the surgeon's radiation exposure, the patient's exposure is higher. When we investigated 2D-fluoroscopically guided and 3D-navigated MIS TLIF in a randomized controlled trial, we detected low radiation doses for both the surgeon and the patient in the 2D-fluoroscopy group. Therefore, we extended the dataset, and herein, we report the radiation-sparing surgical technique of 2D-fluoroscopy-guided MIS TLIF. METHODS Monosegmental and bisegmental MIS TLIF was performed on 24 patients in adherence to advanced radiation protection principles and a radiation-sparing surgical protocol. Dedicated dosemeters recorded patient and surgeon radiation exposure. For safety assessment, pedicle screw accuracy was graded according to the Gertzbein-Robbins classification. RESULTS In total, 99 of 102 (97.1%) pedicle screws were correctly positioned (Gertzbein grade A/B). No breach caused neurological symptoms or necessitated revision surgery. The effective radiation dose to the surgeon was 41 ± 12 µSv per segment. Fluoroscopy time was 64 ± 34 s and 75 ± 43 radiographic images per segment were performed. Patient radiation doses at the neck, chest, and umbilical area were 65 ± 40, 123 ± 116, and 823 ± 862 µSv per segment, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Using a dedicated radiation-sparing free-hand technique, 2D-fluoroscopy-guided MIS TLIF is successfully achievable with low radiation exposure to both the surgeon and the patient. With this technique, the maximum annual radiation exposure to the surgeon will not be exceeded, even with workday use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Doria-Medina
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ulrich Hubbe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Scholz
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | - Ronen Sircar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan-Helge Klingler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chauhan D, Ahmad HS, Singh S, Albayar A, Patel A, Welch WC, Yoon JW. A Prospective Cohort Study of Radiation Exposure to a Spine Surgeon's Exposed Body Parts During Utilization of Intraoperative Radiation-based Imaging. Clin Spine Surg 2023; 36:90-95. [PMID: 36959180 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Prospective cohort study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA C-arm fluoroscopy and O-arm navigation are vital tools in modern spine surgeries, but their repeated usage can endanger spine surgeons. Although a surgeon's chest and abdomen are protected by lead aprons, the eyes and extremities generally receive less protection. OBJECTIVE In this study, we compare differences in intraoperative radiation exposure across the protected and unprotected regions of a surgeon's body. METHODS Sixty-five consecutive spine surgeries were performed by a single spine-focused neurosurgeon over 9 months. Radiation exposure to the primary surgeon was measured through dosimeters worn over the lead apron, under the lead apron, on surgical loupes, and as a ring on the dominant hand. Differences were assessed with rigorous statistical testing and radiation exposure per surgical case was extrapolated. RESULTS During the study, the measured radiation exposure over the apron, 176 mrem, was significantly greater than that under the apron, 8 mrem (P = 0.0020), demonstrating a shielding protective effect. The surgeon's dominant hand was exposed to 329 mrem whereas the eyes were exposed to 152.5 mrem of radiation. Compared with the surgeon's protected abdominal area, the hands (P = 0.0002) and eyes (P = 0.0002) received significantly greater exposure. Calculated exposure per case was 2.8 mrem for the eyes and 5.1 mrem for the hands. It was determined that a spine-focused neurosurgeon operating 400 cases annually will incur a radiation exposure of 60,750 mrem to the hands and 33,900 mrem to the eyes over a 30-year career. CONCLUSIONS Our study found that spine surgeons encounter significantly more radiation exposure to the eyes and the extremities compared with protected body regions. Lifetime exposure exceeds the annual limits set by the International Commission on Radiologic Protection for the extremities (50,000 mrem/y) and the eyes (15,000 mrem/y), calling for increased awareness about the dangerous levels of radiation exposure that a spine surgeon incurs over one's career.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daksh Chauhan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu T, Chen YF, Huang Y, Meng FH, Lu JH, Liu D. Ultrasound-guided Jamshidi needle puncture to reduce radiation exposure during percutaneous pedicle screw placement: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e064838. [PMID: 36898753 PMCID: PMC10008456 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Percutaneous pedicle screw placement (PPSP) is a minimally invasive procedure highly dependent on fluoroscopic guidance, which results in increased radiation exposure and prolonged operative time. Ultrasound can image the lumbar paravertebral anatomy and the needle trajectory in real time, which may help reduce the use of fluoroscopy and radiation dose in PPSP. We will conduct a parallel randomised controlled trial to mainly investigate the effect of ultrasound guidance in radiation reduction during PPSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A total of 42 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to the intervention group and the control group at a 1:1 ratio. In the intervention group, we will use ultrasound in combination with fluoroscopy to guide the insertion of the Jamshidi needles. In the control group, PPSP will be performed under conventional fluoroscopic guidance. The primary outcomes are the cumulative fluoroscopy time (s), radiation dose (mGy) and exposure times of screw placement. The secondary outcomes are insertion time of guidewire, rate of pedicle perforation, rate of facet joint violation, visual analogue scale for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index and complications. The participants, outcome assessors and data analysts will be blinded to allocation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial was approved by the research ethics committee of Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University. The results will be presented at academic seminars and submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.This study involves human participants and was approved by Research Ethics Committee of Shengjing Hospital, China Medical University reference number:2022PS704K. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ChiCTR2200057131.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Wu
- Department of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Yi-Feng Chen
- Department of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Ultrasound, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Fan-He Meng
- Department of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Jing-Han Lu
- Department of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Da Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Croci DM, Nguyen S, Streitmatter SW, Sherrod BA, Hardy J, Cole KL, Gamblin AS, Bisson EF, Mazur MD, Dailey AT. O-Arm Accuracy and Radiation Exposure in Adult Deformity Surgery. World Neurosurg 2023; 171:e440-e446. [PMID: 36528322 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2022] [Revised: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In long thoracolumbar deformity surgery, accurate screw positioning is critical for spinal stability. We assessed pedicle and pelvic screw accuracy and radiation exposure in patients undergoing long thoracolumbar deformity fusion surgery (≥4 levels) involving 3-dimensional fluoroscopy (O-Arm/Stealth) navigation. METHODS In this retrospective single-center cohort study, all patients aged >18 years who underwent fusion in 2016-2018 were reviewed. O-Arm images were assessed for screw accuracy. Effective radiation doses were calculated. The primary outcome was pedicle screw accuracy (Heary grade). Secondary outcomes were pelvic fixation screw accuracy, radiation exposure, and screw-related perioperative and postoperative complications or revision surgery within 3 years. RESULTS Of 1477 pedicle screws placed in 91 patients (mean 16.41 ± 5.6 screws/patient), 1208 pedicle screws (81.8%) could be evaluated by 3-dimensional imaging after placement. Heary Grade I placement was achieved in 1150 screws (95.2%), Grade II in 47 (3.9%), Grade III in 10 (0.82%), Grade IV in 1 (0.08%), and Grade V in 0; Grade III-V were replaced intraoperatively. One of 60 (1.6%) sacroiliac screws placed showed medial cortical breach and was replaced. The average O-Arm-related effective dose was 29.54 ± 14.29 mSv and effective dose/spin was 8.25 ± 2.65 mSv. No postoperative neurological worsening, vascular injuries, or revision surgeries for screw misplacement were recorded. CONCLUSIONS With effective radiation doses similar to those in interventional neuroendovascular procedures, the use of O-Arm in multilevel complex deformity surgery resulted in high screw accuracy, no need for surgical revision because of screw malposition, less additional imaging, and no radiation exposure for the surgical team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Davide Marco Croci
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Sarah Nguyen
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Seth W Streitmatter
- Medical Imaging Physics and Radiation Safety, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Brandon A Sherrod
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Jeremy Hardy
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Kyril L Cole
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Austin S Gamblin
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Erica F Bisson
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Marcus D Mazur
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andrew T Dailey
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Accuracy and digital screw path design of TiRobot-assisted pedicle screw placement for lumbar spondylolisthesis. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS 2023; 47:309-317. [PMID: 36331595 DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05615-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate lumbar spondylolisthesis screw placement assisted by TiRobot in terms of digital screw path design, accurate implementation, and accuracy evaluation method. METHODS In this study, we enrolled 40 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis between December 2020 and August 2021 who underwent spine surgery at the Affiliated Hospital of PuTian University. Pre-operative computed tomography position and screw path designation, intra-operative pedicle screw placement according to pre-operative planning, and post-operative evaluation of the accuracy of screw placement were performed. 3D coordinates of the entry and exit points before and after the operation were collected. The qualified points at different levels of accuracy were counted. The screw placement accuracy was based on the absolute difference using the Chi-squared test. RESULTS In total, 194 screws were successfully implanted with no screws penetrating the cortex. The absolute difference of entry points X, Y, and Z coordinates before and after the operation was 0.425 ± 0.294 mm, 0.417 ± 0.310 mm, and 0.466 ± 0.327 mm, respectively. The corresponding values in terms of exit points were 0.702 ± 0.470 mm, 0.963 ± 0.595mm, and 0.983 ± 0.566 mm, respectively. No obvious differences in coordinates before and after the operation were observed with an entry point degree of accuracy of ≥ 1.2 mm and exit point degree of accuracy of ≥ 2.1 mm. Therefore, the real surgery was consistent with the design. CONCLUSIONS TiRobot-assisted lumbar spondylolisthesis surgery achieved optimal path designation and precise surgery.
Collapse
|
16
|
Oba H, Uehara M, Ikegami S, Hatakenaka T, Kamanaka T, Miyaoka Y, Kurogouchi D, Fukuzawa T, Mimura T, Tanikawa Y, Koseki M, Ohba T, Takahashi J. Tips and pitfalls to improve accuracy and reduce radiation exposure in intraoperative CT navigation for pediatric scoliosis: a systematic review. Spine J 2023; 23:183-196. [PMID: 36174926 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Revised: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT An increasing number of medical centers are adopting an intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) navigation system (iCT-Navi) to provide three-dimensional navigation for pediatric scoliosis surgery. While iCT-Navi has been reported to provide higher pedicle screw (PS) insertion accuracy, it may also result in higher radiation exposure to the patient. What innovations and studies have been introduced to reduce radiation exposure and further improve PS insertion? PURPOSE Evaluate the level of evidence and quality of papers while categorizing the tips and pitfalls regarding pediatric scoliosis surgery using iCT-Navi. Compare iCT-Navi with other methods, including preoperative CT navigation. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review. PATIENT SAMPLE Articles on pediatric scoliosis surgery with iCT-Navi published through to June 2022. OUTCOME MEASURES PS perforation rate and patient intraoperative radiation dose. METHODS Following PRISMA guidelines, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and PubMed databases were searched for articles satisfying the criteria of iCT-Navi use and pediatric scoliosis surgery. The level of evidence and quality of the articles meeting the criteria were evaluated according to the guidelines of the North American Spine Society and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons, respectively. The articles were also categorized by theme and summarized in terms of PS insertion accuracy and intraoperative radiation dose. The origins and characteristics of five major classification methods of PS perforation grade were summarized as well. RESULTS The literature search identified 811 studies, of which 20 papers were included in this review. Overall, 513 pediatric scoliosis patients (381 idiopathic, 44 neuromuscular, 39 neurofibromatosis type 1, 28 congenital, 14 syndromic, seven other) were evaluated for PS perforations among 6,209 iCT-Navi insertions. We found that 232 (3.7%) screws were judged as major perforations (G2 or G3), 55 (0.9%) screws were judged as dangerous deviations (G3), and seven (0.1%) screws were removed. There were no reports of neurovascular injury caused by PSs. The risk factors for PS perforation included more than six vertebrae distance from the reference frame, more than nine consecutive insertions, upper thoracic level, thinner pedicle, upper instrumented vertebra proximity, short stature, and female. The accuracy of PS insertion did not remarkably decrease when the radiation dose was reduced to 1/5 or 1/10 by altering the iCT-Navi protocol. CONCLUSIONS iCT-Navi has the potential to reduce PS perforation rates compared with other methods. The use of low-dose radiation protocols may not significantly affect PS perforation rates. Although several risk factors for PS perforation and measures to reduce radiation dose have been reported, the current evidence is limited by a lack of consistency in classifying PS perforation and evaluating patient radiation dose among studies. The standardization of several outcome definitions is recommended in this rapidly developing field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroki Oba
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan.
| | - Masashi Uehara
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Shota Ikegami
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Terue Hatakenaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Takayuki Kamanaka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Yoshinari Miyaoka
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kurogouchi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Takuma Fukuzawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Tetsuhiko Mimura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Yusuke Tanikawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| | - Michihiko Koseki
- Faculty of Textile Science and Technology, Shinshu University, 3-15-1 Tokida, Ueda, Nagano 386-8567, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Ohba
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Yamanashi School of Medicine, School of Medicine, 1110 Shimokato, Chuo, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan
| | - Jun Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Shinshu University School of Medicine, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Caelers I, Berendsen R, Droeghaag R, Pecasse N, Rijkers K, Van Hemert W, De Bie R, Van Santbrink H. Comparing radiation dose of image-guided techniques in lumbar fusion surgery with pedicle screw insertion; A systematic review. NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL 2023; 13:100199. [PMID: 36747986 PMCID: PMC9898805 DOI: 10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background Context Fluoroscopic devices can be used to visualize subcutaneous and osseous tissue, a useful feature during pedicle screw insertion in lumbar fusion surgery. It is important that both patient and surgeon are exposed as little as possible, since these devices use potential harmful ionizing radiation. Purpose This study aims to compare radiation exposure of different image-guided techniques in lumbar fusion surgery with pedicle screw insertion. Study Design Systematic review. Methods Cochrane, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science databases were used to acquire relevant studies. Eligibility criteria were lumbar and/or sacral spine, pedicle screw, mGray and/or Sievert and/or mrem, radiation dose and/or radiation exposure. Image-guided techniques were divided in five groups: conventional C-arm, C-arm navigation, C-arm robotic, O-arm navigation and O-arm robotic. Comparisons were made based on effective dose for patients and surgeons, absorbed dose for patients and surgeons and exposure. Risk of bias was assessed using the 2017 Cochrane Risk of Bias tool on RCTs and the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool on NRCTs. Level of evidence was assessed using the guidelines of Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine 2011. Results A total of 1423 studies were identified of which 38 were included in the analysis and assigned to one of the five groups. Results of radiation dose per procedure and per pedicle screw were described in dose ranges. Conventional C-arm appeared to result in higher effective dose for surgeons, higher absorbed dose for patients and higher exposure, compared to C-arm navigation/robotic and O-arm navigation/robotic. Level of evidence was 3 to 4 in 29 studies. Risk of bias of RCTs was intermediate, mostly due to inadequate blinding. Overall risk of bias score in NRCTs was determined as 'serious'. Conclusions Ranges of radiation doses using different modalities during pedicle screw insertion in lumbar fusion surgery are wide. Based on the highest numbers in the ranges, conventional C-arm tends to lead to a higher effective dose for surgeons, higher absorbed dose for patients and higher exposure, compared to C-arm-, and O-arm navigation/robotic. The level of evidence is low and risk of bias is fairly high. In future studies, heterogeneity should be limited by standardizing measurement methods and thoroughly describing the image-guided technique settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I.J.M.H. Caelers
- CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands,Department of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands,Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands,Corresponding author.
| | - R.C.M. Berendsen
- Department of Medical Physics, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - R. Droeghaag
- Department of Orthopedic surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - N.J.J. Pecasse
- Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, the etherlands
| | - K. Rijkers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands,Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - W.L.W. Van Hemert
- Department of Orthopedic surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands
| | - R.A. De Bie
- CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands,Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - H. Van Santbrink
- CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands,Department of Neurosurgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, the Netherlands,Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Goodwin ML, Buchowski JM, Sciubba DM. Why X-rays? The importance of radiographs in spine surgery. Spine J 2022; 22:1759-1767. [PMID: 35908587 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.07.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Despite the advances made in high-resolution spinal imaging, plain films (radiographs or x-rays) remain a cornerstone of evaluating and caring for spine patients in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings. Although often undervalued when compared with more advanced imaging such as MRIs or CT scans, plain films provide surgeons invaluable information that other imaging modalities oftentimes cannot. In addition to their use during surgery for localization or evaluation of hardware placement, x-rays provide an overall image of a patient's spine, are useful in evaluating hardware complications, allow detailed assessment of alignment and stability and allow for repeated images in clinic during follow-up. Plain films continue to provide critical information that cannot be obtained with other imaging modalities, and they remain central to providing optimal care for spine patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew L Goodwin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA.
| | - Jacob M Buchowski
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 S Euclid Ave, St. Louis, MO 63110 USA
| | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Northwell Health Chair of Neurosurgery at North Shore University Hospital and Long Island Jewish Medical Center, NY, USA; Institute for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Northwell Health and Chair of Neurosciences, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra Northwell, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Neuromonitoring in Lateral Interbody Fusion: A Systematic Review. World Neurosurg 2022; 168:268-277.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
20
|
Navigation accuracy and assessability of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK instrumentation with multimodal intraoperative imaging in spinal oncology. Sci Rep 2022; 12:15816. [PMID: 36138117 PMCID: PMC9500029 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20222-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiolucent carbon-fiber reinforced PEEK (CFRP) implants have helped improve oncological follow-up and radiation therapy. Here, we investigated the performance of 3D intraoperative imaging and navigation systems for instrumentation and precision assessment of CFRP pedicle screws across the thoraco-lumbar spine. Thirty-three patients with spinal tumors underwent navigated CFRP instrumentation with intraoperative CT (iCT), robotic cone-beam CT (rCBCT) or cone-beam CT (CBCT) imaging. Two different navigation systems were used for iCT-/rCBCT- and CBCT-based navigation. Demographic, clinical and outcome data was assessed. Four blinded observers rated image quality, assessability and accuracy of CFRP pedicle screws. Inter-observer reliability was determined with Fleiss` Kappa analysis. Between 2018 and 2021, 243 CFRP screws were implanted (iCT:93, rCBCT: 99, CBCT: 51), of which 13 were non-assessable (iCT: 1, rCBCT: 9, CBCT: 3; *p = 0.0475; iCT vs. rCBCT). Navigation accuracy was highest using iCT (74%), followed by rCBCT (69%) and CBCT (49%) (*p = 0.0064; iCT vs. CBCT and rCBCT vs. CBCT). All observers rated iCT image quality higher than rCBCT/CBCT image quality (*p < 0.01) but relevant pedicle breaches were reliably identified with substantial agreement between all observers regardless of the imaging modality. Navigation accuracy for CFRP pedicle screws was considerably lower than expected from reports on titanium implants and CT may be best for reliable assessment of CFRP materials.
Collapse
|
21
|
Navigation Techniques in Endoscopic Spine Surgery. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2022; 2022:8419739. [PMID: 36072476 PMCID: PMC9444441 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8419739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Revised: 07/31/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic spine surgery (ESS) advances the principles of minimally invasive surgery, including minor collateral tissue damage, reduced blood loss, and faster recovery times. ESS allows for direct access to the spine through small incisions and direct visualization of spinal pathology via an endoscope. While this technique has many applications, there is a steep learning curve when adopting ESS into a surgeon's practice. Two types of navigation, optical and electromagnetic, may allow for widespread utilization of ESS by engendering improved orientation to surgical anatomy and reduced complication rates. The present review discusses these two available navigation technologies and their application in endoscopic procedures by providing case examples. Furthermore, we report on the future directions of navigation within the discipline of ESS.
Collapse
|
22
|
Mandelka E, Gierse J, Gruetzner PA, Franke J, Vetter SY. First Clinical Experience with a Novel 3D C-Arm-Based System for Navigated Percutaneous Thoracolumbar Pedicle Screw Placement. Medicina (B Aires) 2022; 58:medicina58081111. [PMID: 36013578 PMCID: PMC9414596 DOI: 10.3390/medicina58081111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Navigated pedicle screw placement is becoming increasingly popular, as it has been shown to reduce the rate of screw misplacement. We present our intraoperative workflow and initial experience in terms of safety, efficiency, and clinical feasibility with a novel system for a 3D C-arm cone beam computed-tomography-based navigation of thoracolumbar pedicle screws. Materials and Methods: The first 20 consecutive cases of C-arm cone beam computed-tomography-based percutaneous pedicle screw placement using a novel navigation system were included in this study. Procedural data including screw placement time and patient radiation dose were prospectively collected. Final pedicle screw accuracy was assessed using the Gertzbein–Robbins grading system. Results: In total, 156 screws were placed. The screw accuracy was 94.9%. All the pedicle breaches occurred on the lateral pedicle wall, and none caused clinical complications. On average, a time of 2:42 min was required to place a screw. The mean intraoperative patient radiation exposure was 7.46 mSv. Conclusions: In summary, the investigated combination of C-arm CBCT-based navigation proved to be easy to implement and highly reliable. It facilitates the accurate and efficient percutaneous placement of pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine. The careful use of intraoperative imaging maintains the intraoperative radiation exposure to the patient at a moderate level.
Collapse
|
23
|
Intraoperative imaging and navigated spinopelvic instrumentation: S2-alar-iliac screws combined with tricortical S1 pedicle screw fixation. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2022; 31:2587-2596. [PMID: 35771266 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07268-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The present study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety and accuracy of navigated spinopelvic fixation with focus on S2-alar-iliac screws (S2AIS) and tricortical S1 pedicle screw implantation with the use of high-resolution three-dimensional intraoperative imaging and real-time spinal navigation. METHODS Patients undergoing navigated intraoperative CT-based spinopelvic stabilization between January 2016 and September 2019 were included. Pelvic fixation was achieved by implantation of S2AIS or iliac screws (IS). S1 screws were implanted with the goal of achieving tricortical purchase. In all cases, instrumentation was performed with real-time spinal navigation and intraoperative screw positioning was assessed using intraoperative computed tomography (iCT), cone-beam CT (CBCT) and robotic cone-beam CT (rCBCT). Screw accuracy was evaluated based on radiographic criteria. To identify predictors of complications, univariate analysis was performed. RESULTS Overall, 52 patients (85%) received S2AIS and nine patients (15%) received IS instrumentation. Intraoperative imaging and spinal navigation were performed with iCT in 34 patients, CBCT in 21 patients and rCBCT in six patients. A total number of 10/128 (7.8%) iliac screws underwent successful intraoperative correction due to misalignment. Tricortical purchase was successfully accomplished in 58/110 (53%) of the S1 screws with a clear learning curve in the course of time. S2AIS implantation was associated with significantly fewer surgical side infection-associated surgeries. CONCLUSIONS Real-time navigation facilitated spinopelvic instrumentation with increasing accuracy of S2AIS and tricortical S1 screws. Intraoperative imaging by iCT, CBCT or rCBCT permitted screw assessment with the chance of direct navigated revision of misplaced iliac screws to avoid secondary screw revision surgery.
Collapse
|
24
|
Malham GM, Munday NR. Comparison of novel machine vision spinal image guidance system with existing 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation system: a randomized prospective study. Spine J 2022; 22:561-569. [PMID: 34666179 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/01/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT The use of spinal image guidance systems (IGS) has increased patient safety, accuracy, operative efficiency, and reduced revision rates in pedicle screw placement procedures. Traditional intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy or CT imaging produces potentially harmful ionizing radiation and increases operative time to register the patient. An IGS, FLASH Navigation, uses machine vision through high resolution stereoscopic cameras and structured visible light to build a 3D topographical map of the patient's bony surface anatomy enabling navigation use without ionizing radiation. PURPOSE We aimed to compare FLASH navigation system to a widely used 3D fluoroscopic navigation (3D) platform by comparing radiation exposure and pedicle screw accuracy. DESIGN A randomized prospective comparative cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing open posterior lumbar instrumented fusion. PATIENT SAMPLE Adults diagnosed with spinal pathology requiring surgical treatment and planning for open posterior lumbar fusion with pedicle screws implanted into 1-4 vertebral levels. OUTCOME MEASURES Outcome measures included mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time and dose, mean CT dose length product (DLP) for preoperative and day 2 CT, pedicle screw accuracy by CT, estimated blood loss and revision surgery rate. METHODS Consecutive patients were randomized 1:1 to FLASH or 3D and underwent posterior lumbar instrumented fusion. Radiation doses were recorded from pre- and postoperative CT and intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy. 2 independent blinded radiologists reviewed pedicle screw accuracy on CT. RESULTS A total of 429 (n=210 FLASH, n=219 3D) pedicle screws were placed in 90 patients (n=45 FLASH, n=45 3D) over the 18-month study period. Mean age and indication for surgery were similar between both groups, with a non-significantly higher ratio of males in the 3D group. Mean intraoperative fluoroscopy time and doses were significantly reduced in FLASH compared to 3D (4.51±3.71s vs 79.6±23.0s, p<.001 and 80.9±68.1cGycm2 vs 3704.1±3442.4 cGycm2, p<.001, respectively). This represented a relative reduction of 94.3% in the total intraoperative radiation time and a 97.8% reduction in the total intraoperative radiation dose. Mean preoperative CT DLP and mean day 2 postoperative CT DLP were significantly reduced in FLASH compared to 3D (662.0±440.4mGy-cm vs 1008.9±616.3 mGy-cm, p<.001 and 577.9±294.3 mGy-cm vs 980.7±441.6 mGy-cm, p<.001, respectively). This represented relative reductions of 34.4% and 41.0% in the preoperative CT dose and postoperative total DLP, respectively. The FLASH group required an average of 1.2 registrations in each case with an average of 2447 (±961.3) data points registered with a mean registration time of 106s (±52.1). A rapid re-registration mechanism was utilized in 22% (n=10/45) of cases and took 22.7s (±11.3). Re-registration was used in 7% (n=3/45) in the 3D group. Pedicle screw accuracy was high in FLASH (98.1%) and 3D (97.3%) groups with no pedicle breach >2mm in either group (p<.001). EBL was not statistically different between the groups (p=.38). No neurovascular injuries occurred, and no patients required return to theatre for screw repositioning. CONCLUSIONS FLASH and 3D IGS demonstrate high accuracy for pedicle screw placement. FLASH showed significant reduction in intraoperative radiation time and dose with lower but non-significant blood loss. FLASH showed significant reduction in preoperative and postoperative radiation, but this may be associated to the lower number of males/females preponderance in this group. FLASH provides similar accuracy to contemporary IGS without requiring 3D-fluoroscopy or radiolucent operating tables. Reducing registration time and specialized equipment may reduce costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory M Malham
- Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Melbourne, Australia; Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Accuracy of patient-specific drill guide template for bilateral C1-C2 laminar screw placement: a cadaveric study. World Neurosurg 2022; 162:e225-e234. [PMID: 35259502 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the accuracy of using patient-specific drill guides to place bilateral laminar screws in C1 and C2. METHODS Nine cervical specimens (8 male; mean age: 66.6 (56-73)) with the occiput attached (C0-C3) were used in this study. Pre-operative CT scans were used to create digital anatomic models for templating and guide creation. A total of 36 screws were placed with the aid of 3D printed patient-specific guides (2 screws at C1 and C2). Post-operative CT scans were performed following screw insertion. The planned and actual trajectories were compared using pre- and post-operative imaging based on the angular and entry point deviation. After screw placement and post-operative imaging, each specimen was dissected and performed a visual inspection for breaches. RESULTS No breaches or violations were observed on post-procedure CT and visual inspection. The average variation of the entry point in the X, Y, and Z-axis was 0.3±0.28, 0.41±0.38, and 0.29±0.24, respectively. No statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was observed between the planned and obtained entry points. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the deviation analysis between the planned and obtained angles in the axial and coronal planes. CONCLUSION The study demonstrates that patient-specific drill guides allow for accurate C1 and C2 bilateral laminar screw placement, with a low risk of cortical breach.
Collapse
|
26
|
Lubelski D, Theodore N. Editorial. Benefits of robotic spine surgery: the future is bright. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52:E5. [DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.focus21635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lubelski
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nicholas Theodore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kendlbacher P, Tkatschenko D, Czabanka M, Bayerl S, Bohner G, Woitzik J, Vajkoczy P, Hecht N. Workflow and performance of intraoperative CT, cone-beam CT, and robotic cone-beam CT for spinal navigation in 503 consecutive patients. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52:E7. [PMID: 34973677 DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.focus21467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A direct comparison of intraoperative CT (iCT), cone-beam CT (CBCT), and robotic cone-beam CT (rCBCT) has been necessary to identify the ideal imaging solution for each individual user's need. Herein, the authors sought to analyze workflow, handling, and performance of iCT, CBCT, and rCBCT imaging for navigated pedicle screw instrumentation across the entire spine performed within the same surgical environment by the same group of surgeons. METHODS Between 2014 and 2018, 503 consecutive patients received 2673 navigated pedicle screws using iCT (n = 1219), CBCT (n = 646), or rCBCT (n = 808) imaging during the first 24 months after the acquisition of each modality. Clinical and demographic data, workflow, handling, and screw assessment and accuracy were analyzed. RESULTS Intraoperative CT showed image quality and workflow advantages for cervicothoracic cases, obese patients, and long-segment instrumentation, whereas CBCT and rCBCT offered independent handling, around-the-clock availability, and the option of performing 2D fluoroscopy. All modalities permitted reliable intraoperative screw assessment. Navigated screw revision was possible with each modality and yielded final accuracy rates > 92% in all groups (iCT 96.2% vs CBCT 92.3%, p < 0.001) without a difference in the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement or the rate of secondary screw revision surgeries. CONCLUSIONS Continuous training and an individual setup of iCT, CBCT, and rCBCT has been shown to permit safe and precise navigated posterior instrumentation across the entire spine with reliable screw assessment and the option of immediate revision. The perceived higher image quality and larger scan area of iCT should be weighed against the around-the-clock availability of CBCT and rCBCT technology with the option of single-handed robotic image acquisition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Kendlbacher
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.,2Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | | | - Marcus Czabanka
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.,2Department of Neurosurgery, Goethe Universität Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main
| | - Simon Bayerl
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | - Georg Bohner
- 3Department of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin; and
| | - Johannes Woitzik
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin.,4Department of Neurosurgery, University at Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | - Nils Hecht
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pennington Z, Judy BF, Zakaria HM, Lakomkin N, Mikula AL, Elder BD, Theodore N. Learning curves in robot-assisted spine surgery: a systematic review and proposal of application to residency curricula. Neurosurg Focus 2022; 52:E3. [PMID: 34973673 DOI: 10.3171/2021.10.focus21496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Spine robots have seen increased utilization over the past half decade with the introduction of multiple new systems. Market research expects this expansion to continue over the next half decade at an annual rate of 20%. However, because of the novelty of these devices, there is limited literature on their learning curves and how they should be integrated into residency curricula. With the present review, the authors aimed to address these two points. METHODS A systematic review of the published English-language literature on PubMed, Ovid, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted to identify studies describing the learning curve in spine robotics. Included articles described clinical results in patients using one of the following endpoints: operative time, screw placement time, fluoroscopy usage, and instrumentation accuracy. Systems examined included the Mazor series, the ExcelsiusGPS, and the TiRobot. Learning curves were reported in a qualitative synthesis, given as the mean improvement in the endpoint per case performed or screw placed where possible. All studies were level IV case series with a high risk of reporting bias. RESULTS Of 1579 unique articles, 97 underwent full-text review and 21 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria; 62 articles were excluded for not presenting primary data for one of the above-described endpoints. Of the 21 articles, 18 noted the presence of a learning curve in spine robots, which ranged from 3 to 30 cases or 15 to 62 screws. Only 12 articles performed regressions of one of the endpoints (most commonly operative time) as a function of screws placed or cases performed. Among these, increasing experience was associated with a 0.24- to 4.6-minute decrease in operative time per case performed. All but one series described the experience of attending surgeons, not residents. CONCLUSIONS Most studies of learning curves with spine robots have found them to be present, with the most common threshold being 20 to 30 cases performed. Unfortunately, all available evidence is level IV data, limited to case series. Given the ability of residency to allow trainees to safely perform these cases under the supervision of experienced senior surgeons, it is argued that a curriculum should be developed for senior-level residents specializing in spine comprising a minimum of 30 performed cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Brendan F Judy
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| | - Hesham M Zakaria
- 3Department of Neurosurgery, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, California
| | - Nikita Lakomkin
- 1Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | - Nicholas Theodore
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; and
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Foster N, Shaffrey C, Buchholz A, Turner R, Yang LZ, Niedzwiecki D, Goode A. Image quality and Dose Comparison of Three Mobile Intraoperative 3D imaging Systems in Spine Surgery. World Neurosurg 2021; 160:e142-e151. [PMID: 34979287 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.12.103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2021] [Revised: 12/24/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study evaluated the radiation exposure and image quality for three intraoperative imaging systems (Airo, Spin, O-arm) using varying radiation dose settings in a single cadaver model. METHODS Axial images of L4-5 instrumentation were obtained using three manufacturer dose protocols for each system. Measurements included scattered radiation dose, subjective and objective image quality (IQ) and estimates of patient effective dose (ED). Four images per system were selected at each dose level. Using the Likert scale (1- best, 5- worst), nine reviewers rated the same 36 images. Objective IQ measures the degree of streak artifacts (lines with incorrect data from metal objects) in each image. A composite figure of merit (FOM) was derived based on ED and subjective and objective scores. RESULTS The best subjective IQ scores were Spin medium (1.44), high dose (1.78), and Airo (2.22) low dose. The best objective IQ scores were Airo (87.3), followed by Spin (89.1). ED low dose results in mSv included Airo (1.6), Spin (1.9) and O-arm (3.3). The ED high-dose results in mSv included Spin (4.6), Airo (9.7) and O-arm (9.9). Scatter radiation measurements for low dose in μGy included Spin (21.9), Airo (31.8) and O-arm (33.9). Scatter radiation for high dose in μGy included Spin (55.9), O-arm (104.5) and Airo (200). The best FOM score was for the Airo low dose, followed by Spin medium and high dose. CONCLUSION The selection of intraoperative imaging systems requires a greater understanding of the risks and benefits of radiation exposure and IQ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norah Foster
- Department of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3077, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Christopher Shaffrey
- Department of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Box 3077, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Avery Buchholz
- Department of Neurosciences Surgery, The University of Virginia, 415 Ray C Hunt Dr, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| | - Raymond Turner
- Department of Neurosurgery Prisma Health, 701 Grove Rd, Greenville, SC 29605
| | - Lexie Zidanyue Yang
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Road Ste 1106, 11028E Hock Plaza, Durham, NC 27705
| | - Donna Niedzwiecki
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Road Ste 1106, 11028E Hock Plaza, Durham, NC 27705
| | - Allen Goode
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, The University of Virginia, 1215 Lee St, Charlottesville, VA 22908
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Pennington Z, Ehresman J, Szerlip NJ, Sciubba DM. Hybrid Therapy for Metastatic Disease. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:369-376. [PMID: 33769974 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Metastatic spine disease represents a complex clinical entity, requiring a multidisciplinary treatment team to formulate treatment plans that treat disease, palliate symptoms, and give patients the greatest quality-of-life. With the improvement in focused radiation technologies, the role of surgery has changed from a standalone treatment to an adjuvant supporting other treatment modalities. As patients within this population are often exceptionally frail, there has been increased emphasis on the smallest possible surgery to achieve the team's treatment goals. Surgeons have increasingly turned to more minimally invasive techniques for treating spinal metastases. The use of these procedures, called separation surgery, centers around the goal of decompressing the neural elements, creating or maintaining mechanical stability, and allowing enough room for high-dose radiation to minimize cord dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jeff Ehresman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Daniel M Sciubba
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wessels L, Komm B, Bohner G, Vajkoczy P, Hecht N. Spinal alignment shift between supine and prone CT imaging occurs frequently and regardless of the anatomic region, risk factors, or pathology. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 45:855-863. [PMID: 34379226 PMCID: PMC8827393 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-021-01618-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Computer-assisted spine surgery based on preoperative CT imaging may be hampered by sagittal alignment shifts due to an intraoperative switch from supine to prone. In the present study, we systematically analyzed the occurrence and pattern of sagittal spinal alignment shift between corresponding preoperative (supine) and intraoperative (prone) CT imaging in patients that underwent navigated posterior instrumentation between 2014 and 2017. Sagittal alignment across the levels of instrumentation was determined according to the C2 fracture gap (C2-F) and C2 translation (C2-T) in odontoid type 2 fractures, next to the modified Cobb angle (CA), plumbline (PL), and translation (T) in subaxial pathologies. One-hundred and twenty-one patients (C1/C2: n = 17; C3-S1: n = 104) with degenerative (39/121; 32%), oncologic (35/121; 29%), traumatic (34/121; 28%), or infectious (13/121; 11%) pathologies were identified. In the subaxial spine, significant shift occurred in 104/104 (100%) cases (CA: *p = .044; T: *p = .021) compared to only 10/17 (59%) cases that exhibited shift at the C1/C2 level (C2-F: **p = .002; C2-T: *p < .016). The degree of shift was not affected by the anatomic region or pathology but significantly greater in cases with an instrumentation length > 5 segments (“∆PL > 5 segments”: 4.5 ± 1.8 mm; “∆PL ≤ 5 segments”: 2 ± 0.6 mm; *p = .013) or in revision surgery with pre-existing instrumentation (“∆PL presence”: 5 ± 2.6 mm; “∆PL absence”: 2.4 ± 0.7 mm; **p = .007). Interestingly, typical morphological instability risk factors did not influence the degree of shift. In conclusion, intraoperative spinal alignment shift due to a change in patient position should be considered as a cause for inaccuracy during computer-assisted spine surgery and when correcting spinal alignment according to parameters that were planned in other patient positions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Wessels
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bettina Komm
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Georg Bohner
- Department of Neuroradiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nils Hecht
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Charles YP, Cazzato RL, Nachabe R, Chatterjea A, Steib JP, Gangi A. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Augmented Reality Surgical Navigation for Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement. Clin Spine Surg 2021; 34:E415-E424. [PMID: 33560011 DOI: 10.1097/bsd.0000000000001132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN This was a retrospective observational study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of percutaneous pedicle screw placement using augmented reality surgical navigation during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Augmented reality-based navigation is a new type of computer-assisted navigation where video cameras are used instead of infrared cameras to track the operated patients and surgical instruments. This technology has not so far been clinically evaluated for percutaneous pedicle screw placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study assessed percutaneous pedicle screw placement in 20 consecutive patients who underwent single-level minimally invasive TLIF using augmented reality surgical navigation. Facet joint violation and depression by the inserted pedicle screws were evaluated. Secondary outcome such as radiation dose exposure, fluoroscopy time, and operative time were collected for 3 phases of surgery: preparation phase, pedicle screw placement, and decompression with cage placement. RESULTS A clinical accuracy for screw placement within the pedicle (Gertzbein 0 or 1) of 94% was achieved. One screw violated the facet joint with a transarticular pathway. The screw head did not depress the facet in 54%. The use of fluoroscopy during navigation correlated with patient body-mass index (r=0.68, P<0.0001). The pedicle screw placement time corresponded to 36±5% of the total operative time of 117±11 minutes. A statistically significant decrease of 10 minutes in operative time was observed between the first and last 10 procedures which corresponded to the pedicle screw placement time decrease (48±9 vs. 38±7 min, P=0.0142). The learning curve model suggests an ultimate operative time decrease to 97 minutes. CONCLUSION Augmented reality surgical navigation can be clinically used to place percutaneous screws during minimally invasive TLIF. However, the lack of tracking of the location of the device requires intraoperative fluoroscopy to monitor screw insertion depth especially in obese patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roberto L Cazzato
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Rami Nachabe
- Department of Image Guided Therapy Systems, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands
| | - Anindita Chatterjea
- Department of Image Guided Therapy Systems, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands
| | | | - Afshin Gangi
- Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
A real-time 3D electromagnetic navigation system for percutaneous pedicle screw fixation in traumatic thoraco-lumbar fractures: implications for efficiency, fluoroscopic time, and accuracy compared with those of conventional fluoroscopic guidance. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2021; 31:46-55. [PMID: 34333714 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-021-06948-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Navigation is becoming more useful in percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF). The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency, fluoroscopic time, accuracy, and clinical outcomes of PPSF with a novel electromagnetic navigation (EMN) system for thoraco-lumbar (TL) fractures with those of PPSF with conventional C-arm fluoroscopic (CF) guidance. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted. A total of 162 screws were implanted in 29 patients with the assistance of the EMN system (EMN group), and 220 screws were inserted in 40 patients by using CF guidance (CF group). The duration of surgery, placement time per screw, fluoroscopic time per screw, accuracy of pedicle screw placement, and clinical outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS The duration of surgery and placement time per screw in the EMN group were significantly lower than those in the CF group (P < 0.05). The fluoroscopic time per screw in the CF group was significantly longer than that in the EMN group (P < 0.05). The learning curve of PPSF in the EMN group was steeper than that in the CF group. The accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the EMN group was more precise than that in the CF group (P < 0.05). The VAS scores in the EMN group were significantly lower than those in the CF group at one-week postoperatively (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Compared with PPSF by using conventional fluoroscopic guidance, PPSF with the aid of the EMN system can increase the efficiency and accuracy of pedicle screw placement and reduce the fluoroscopic time.
Collapse
|
34
|
Pennington Z, Morgan CD, Uribe JS. Commentary: Present and Future Spinal Robotic and Enabling Technologies. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2021; 21:S57-S58. [PMID: 34128063 DOI: 10.1093/ons/opaa405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 10/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zach Pennington
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Clinton D Morgan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Juan S Uribe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Nowak S, Müller J, Weidemeier ME, Schroeder HWS, Müller JU. Tear-drop technique in iliac screw placement: a technical analysis. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021; 163:1577-1581. [PMID: 33674887 PMCID: PMC8116289 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-021-04788-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Instrumentation of the lumbosacral region is one of the more challenging regions due to the complex anatomical structures and biomechanical forces. Screw insertion can be done both navigated and based on X-ray verification. In this study, we demonstrate a fast and reliable open, low exposure X-ray-guided technique of iliac screw placement. METHODS Between October 2016 and August 2019, 48 patients underwent sacropelvic fixation in tear-drop technique. Screw insertion was performed in open technique by using an X-ray converter angulated 25-30° in coronal and sagittal view. The anatomical insertion point was the posterior superior iliac spine. Verification of correct screw placement was done by intraoperative 3D scan. RESULTS In total, 95 iliac screws were placed in tear-drop technique with a correct placement in 98.1%. CONCLUSIONS The tear-drop technique showed a proper screw position in the intraoperative 3D scan and therefore may be considered an alternative technique to the navigated screw placement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Nowak
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Sauerbruchstraße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany.
| | - Jonas Müller
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Sauerbruchstraße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Martin E Weidemeier
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Sauerbruchstraße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Henry W S Schroeder
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Sauerbruchstraße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jan-Uwe Müller
- Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Klinik und Poliklinik für Neurochirurgie, Sauerbruchstraße, 17475, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Kopparapu S, Lubelski D, Pennington Z, Khan M, Theodore N, Sciubba D. Comparison of operator and patient radiation exposure during fluoroscopy-guided vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine 2021; 35:117-126. [PMID: 33930867 DOI: 10.3171/2020.9.spine201525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PV) and balloon kyphoplasty (BK) are two minimally invasive techniques used to treat mechanical pain secondary to spinal compression fractures. A concern for both procedures is the radiation exposure incurred by both operators and patients. The authors conducted a systematic review of the available literature to examine differences in interventionalist radiation exposure between PV and BK and differences in patient radiation exposure between PV and BK. METHODS The authors conducted a search of the PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Reviews, Embase, and Web of Science databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Full-text articles in English describing one of the primary endpoints in ≥ 5 unique patients treated with PV or BK of the mobile spine were included. Estimates of mean operative time, radiation exposure, and fluoroscopy duration were reported as weighted averages. Additionally, annual occupational dose limits provided by the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (USNRC) were used to determine the number needed to harm (NNH). RESULTS The meta-analysis included 27 articles. For PV, the mean fluoroscopy times were 4.9 ± 3.3 minutes per level without protective measures and 5.2 ± 3.4 minutes with protective measures. The mean operator radiation exposures per level in mrem were 4.6 ± 5.4 at the eye, 7.8 ± 8.7 at the neck, 22.7 ± 62.4 at the torso, and 49.2 ± 62.2 at the hand without protective equipment and 0.3 ± 0.1 at the torso and 95.5 ± 162.5 at the hand with protection. The mean fluoroscopy times per level for BK were 6.1 ± 2.5 minutes without protective measures and 6.0 ± 3.2 minutes with such measures. The mean exposures were 31.3 ± 39.3, 19.7 ± 4.6, 31.8 ± 34.2, and 174.4 ± 117.3 mrem at the eye, neck, torso, and hand, respectively, without protection, and 1, 9.2 ± 26.2, and 187.7 ± 100.4 mrem at the neck, torso, and hand, respectively, with protective equipment. For protected procedures, radiation to the hand was the limiting factor and the NNH estimates were 524 ± 891 and 266 ± 142 for PV and BK, respectively. Patient exposure as measured by flank-mounted dosimeters, entrance skin dose, and dose area product demonstrated lower exposure with PV than BK (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Operator radiation exposure is significantly decreased by the use of protective equipment. Radiation exposure to both the operator and patient is lower for PV than BK. NNH estimates suggest that radiation to the hand limits the number of procedures an operator can safely perform. In particular, radiation to the hand limits PV to 524 and BK to 266 procedures per year before surpassing the threshold set by the USNRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Majid Khan
- 2Interventional Radiology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Carson T, Ghoshal G, Cornwall GB, Tobias R, Schwartz DG, Foley KT. Artificial Intelligence-enabled, Real-time Intraoperative Ultrasound Imaging of Neural Structures Within the Psoas: Validation in a Porcine Spine Model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2021; 46:E146-E152. [PMID: 33399436 PMCID: PMC7787186 DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000003704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 06/28/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN Experimental in-vivo animal study. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate an Artificial Intelligence (AI)-enabled ultrasound imaging system's ability to detect, segment, classify, and display neural and other structures during trans-psoas spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA Current methodologies for intraoperatively localizing and visualizing neural structures within the psoas are limited and can impact the safety of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF). Ultrasound technology, enhanced with AI-derived neural detection algorithms, could prove useful for this task. METHODS The study was conducted using an in vivo porcine model (50 subjects). Image processing and machine learning algorithms were developed to detect neural and other anatomic structures within and adjacent to the psoas muscle while using an ultrasound imaging system during lateral lumbar spine surgery (SonoVision,™ Tissue Differentiation Intelligence, USA). The imaging system's ability to detect and classify the anatomic structures was assessed with subsequent tissue dissection. Dice coefficients were calculated to quantify the performance of the image segmentation. RESULTS The AI-trained ultrasound system detected, segmented, classified, and displayed nerve, psoas muscle, and vertebral body surface with high sensitivity and specificity. The mean Dice coefficient score for each tissue type was >80%, indicating that the detected region and ground truth were >80% similar to each other. The mean specificity of nerve detection was 92%; for bone and muscle, it was >95%. The accuracy of nerve detection was >95%. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that a combination of AI-derived image processing and machine learning algorithms can be developed to enable real-time ultrasonic detection, segmentation, classification, and display of critical anatomic structures, including neural tissue, during spine surgery. AI-enhanced ultrasound imaging can provide a visual map of important anatomy in and adjacent to the psoas, thereby providing the surgeon with critical information intended to increase the safety of LLIF surgery.Level of Evidence: N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler Carson
- NeuroSpine Institute, Palmdale, CA
- Riverside University Health System, Department of Neurosurgery, Moreno Valley, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Kevin T. Foley
- Semmes-Murphey Clinic & Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jenkins NW, Parrish JM, Sheha ED, Singh K. Intraoperative risks of radiation exposure for the surgeon and patient. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:84. [PMID: 33553377 PMCID: PMC7859810 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-1052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Intraoperative radiological imaging serves an essential role in many spine surgery procedures. It is critical that patients, staff and physicians have an adequate understanding of the risks and benefits associated with radiation exposure for all involved. In this review, we briefly introduce the current trends associated with intraoperative radiological imaging. With the increased utilization of minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) techniques, the benefits of intraoperative imaging have become even more important. Less surgical exposure, however, often equates to an increased requirement for intraoperative imaging. Understanding the conventions for radiation measurement, radiological fundamental concepts, along with deterministic or stochastic effects gives a framework for conceptualizing how radiation exposure relates to the risk of various sequela. Additionally, we describe the various options surgeons have for intraoperative imaging modalities including those based on conventional fluoroscopy, computer tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. We also describe different ways to prevent unnecessary radiation exposure including dose reduction, better education, and use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Finally, we conclude with a reflection on the progress that has been made to limit intraoperative radiation exposure and the promise of future technology and policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel W Jenkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James M Parrish
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Evan D Sheha
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Burman S, Das A, Mahajan C, Rath GP. Radiation Concerns for the Neuroanesthesiologists. JOURNAL OF NEUROANAESTHESIOLOGY AND CRITICAL CARE 2020. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractWith the advent of minimally invasive neurosurgical techniques and rapid innovations in the field of neurointervention, there has been a sharp rise in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities requiring radiation exposure. Neuroanesthesiologists are currently involved in various procedures inside as well as outside the operating room (OR) like intensive care units, interventional suites, and gamma knife units. The ambit expands from short-lasting diagnostic scans to lengthy therapeutic procedures performed under fluoroscopic guidance. Hence, a modern-day neuroanesthesiologist has to bear the brunt of the radiation exposure in both inside and outside the OR. However, obliviousness and nonadherence to the relevant radiation safety measures are still prevalent. Radiation protection and safety are topics that need to be discussed with new vigor in the light of current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sourav Burman
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Abanti Das
- Department of Radiology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Charu Mahajan
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Girija P. Rath
- Department of Neuroanaesthesiology and Critical Care, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Konieczny MR, Boos J, Steuwe A, Schleich C, Prost M, Krauspe R. Effective dose of radiation per screw in surgery of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: matched pair analysis of 293 pedicle screws inserted using three different techniques. J Child Orthop 2020; 14:554-561. [PMID: 33343751 PMCID: PMC7740690 DOI: 10.1302/1863-2548.14.200148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Reports on heterogenous groups of patients have indicated that pedicle screw insertion guided by navigation (PIN) leads to, for the patient, higher doses of radiation compared with pedicle screw insertion guided by fluoroscopy (PIF). This would be a major concern, especially in paediatric deformity correction. METHODS After a power analysis (aiming at > 0.8) 293 pedicle screws which were inserted in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis were analyzed by comparing effective dose and fluoroscopy time per screw for three different techniques. Groups 2 and 3 were matched to Group 1 by Lenke type of scoliosis. Group 1 were prospectively enrolled consecutive patients that have been operated on by PIN with image acquisition by preoperative CT scan (CTS). Group 2 were consecutive retrospectively matched patients who have been operated on by PIN with image acquisition by an intraoperative 3D scan (3DS). Group 3 were consecutive retrospectively matched patients who have been operated on by PIF. RESULTS Mean dose of radiation per screw was 1.0 mSv (sd 0.8) per screw in CTS patients, 0.025 mSv (sd 0.001) per screw in 3DS patients and 0.781 mSv (sd 0.12) per screw in PIF patients. The difference was significant (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION When we compared different techniques of navigation, navigation by image acquisition with CTS showed a significantly higher (by 97.5%) dose of radiation per screw for the patient than navigation by image acquisition by a 3DS. Navigation by 3DS showed significantly lower effective dose per screw for the adolescent patients than the fluoroscopic technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Rafael Konieczny
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany,Correspondence should be sent to Markus Konieczny, Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany. E-mail:
| | - Johannes Boos
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Andrea Steuwe
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Christoph Schleich
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Max Prost
- Department of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Krauspe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University Hospital of Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jamshidi AM, Massel DH, Liounakos JI, Silman Z, Good CR, Schroerlucke SR, Cannestra A, Hsu V, Lim J, Zahrawi F, Ramirez PM, Sweeney TM, Wang MY. Fluoroscopy time analysis of a prospective, multi-centre study comparing robotic- and fluoroscopic-guided placement of percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation for short segment minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery. Int J Med Robot 2020; 17:e2188. [PMID: 33217131 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Revised: 09/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As minimally invasive spine surgery becomes more widespread, concerns regarding radiation exposure to surgeons and patients alike have become a growing concern. Robotic guidance has been developed as a way to increase the accuracy of instrumentation while decreasing radiation burden. METHODS A retrospective analysis of a large, multi-centre, prospective study comparing robotic-guided (RG) to fluoroscopic-guided (FG) (Multi-centre, Partially Randomized, Controlled Trial of MIS Robotic vs. Freehand in Short Adult Degenerative Spinal Fusion Surgeries) was performed to evaluate for differences in radiation exposure between study groups. RESULTS RG was associated with 78.3% (p < 0.001) and 79.8% (p < 0.001) reduction in total and per screw fluoroscopy times, respectively, as compared to FG. RG was also associated with a 50.8% (p < 0.001) reduction in total operative fluoroscopy time. CONCLUSIONS RG was associated with significantly lower fluoroscopy times compared to FG. This suggests that utilization of robotic navigation systems may result in decreased operative radiation exposure, which is a growing concern for surgeons performing minimally invasive spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aria M Jamshidi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Dustin H Massel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA.,Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jason I Liounakos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Zmira Silman
- Israel Academic College, Tel Aviv University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | | | | | | | - Victor Hsu
- Rothman Institute, Willow Grove, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jae Lim
- Atlantic Brain & Spine, Reston, Viginia, USA
| | - Faissal Zahrawi
- AdventHealth Neuroscience Institute, Celebration, Florida, USA
| | | | | | - Michael Y Wang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami-Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Li W, Li G, Chen W, Cong L. The safety and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw internal fixation for spine disease: a meta-analysis. Bone Joint Res 2020; 9:653-666. [PMID: 33101655 PMCID: PMC7547641 DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.910.bjr-2020-0064.r2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study was to systematically compare the safety and accuracy of robot-assisted (RA) technique with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted (CT) pedicle screw insertion for spine disease. Methods A systematic search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and WANFANG for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the safety and accuracy of RA compared with conventional freehand with/without fluoroscopy-assisted pedicle screw insertion for spine disease from 2012 to 2019. This meta-analysis used Mantel-Haenszel or inverse variance method with mixed-effects model for heterogeneity, calculating the odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The results of heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, and risk of bias were analyzed. Results Ten RCTs with 713 patients and 3,331 pedicle screws were included. Compared with CT, the accuracy rate of RA was superior in Grade A with statistical significance and Grade A + B without statistical significance. Compared with CT, the operating time of RA was longer. The difference between RA and CT was statistically significant in radiation dose. Proximal facet joint violation occurred less in RA than in CT. The postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) of RA was smaller than that of CT, and there were some interesting outcomes in our subgroup analysis. Conclusion RA technique could be viewed as an accurate and safe pedicle screw implantation method compared to CT. A robotic system equipped with optical intraoperative navigation is superior to CT in accuracy. RA pedicle screw insertion can improve accuracy and maintain stability for some challenging areas.Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2020;9(10):653-666.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weishang Li
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Gaoyu Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Wenting Chen
- Disease Control and Prevention Center, China Railway Shenyang Bureau Group Corporation, Shengyang, China
| | - Lin Cong
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Wang TY, Hamouda F, Mehta VA, Sankey EW, Yarbrough C, Lark R, Abd-El-Barr MM. Effect of Instrument Navigation on C-arm Radiation and Time during Spinal Procedures: A Clinical Evaluation. Int J Spine Surg 2020; 14:375-381. [PMID: 32699760 DOI: 10.14444/7049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction As minimally invasive spine surgery gains popularity, a focused effort must be made to reduce intraoperative radiation exposure to levels as low as reasonably achievable. Here, we demonstrate the clinical efficacy of a novel technology to aid in instrument navigation that aims to reduce intraoperative radiation exposure, number of fluoroscopic images, and time required to perform the most radiation intensive portions of a multitude of spinal procedures. Methods An internally randomized controlled study was performed over a 1-month period in order to clinically evaluate the effect of the C-arm assisted instrument tracking system, TrackX, on surgeon workflow, time, and radiation emitted. Three surgeons performed multiple spinal procedures on a total of 10 study patients and an additional 3 control patients. The surgeries encompassed minimally invasive spinal techniques and spanned extreme lateral interbody fusion, oblique lumbar interbody fusion, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion along with percutaneous iliac screw placement, hardware removal, and kyphoplasty. The tasks studied included skin marking, first dilator insertion, localization for hardware placement and hardware removal. Results Overall radiation reduction was 83% (P < .0001). Overall reduction in x-rays taken was 78% (P < .0001). Overall time reduction was 81% (P = .0003). Statistical significance held for each surgeon studied and for nearly every procedure type. In these 10 study procedures, over 2 hours of overall operating room time was saved, all while requiring negligible set up time and no system calibration or supplementary x-rays to be taken. There were no adverse outcomes for any study patient, and there was no case where TrackX was not able to successfully complete a given portion of a procedure. Conclusions TrackX instrument navigation is a clinically efficacious and accurate instrument tracking modality. This is the first instrument navigational technology that reduces radiation exposure and images required to complete a procedure while decreasing operative time. TrackX thus allows increased surgical efficiency while increasing operative efficiency and improving intraoperative safety. Level of Evidence 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy Y Wang
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Durham, North Carolina
| | | | - Vikram A Mehta
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Eric W Sankey
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Chester Yarbrough
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Robert Lark
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Muhammad M Abd-El-Barr
- Duke University Medical Center, Department of Neurological Surgery, Durham, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jiang B, Azad TD, Cottrill E, Zygourakis CC, Zhu AM, Crawford N, Theodore N. New spinal robotic technologies. Front Med 2019; 13:723-729. [PMID: 31673935 DOI: 10.1007/s11684-019-0716-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Robotic systems in surgery have developed rapidly. Installations of the da Vinci Surgical System® (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), widely used in urological and gynecological procedures, have nearly doubled in the United States from 2010 to 2017. Robotics systems in spine surgery have been adopted more slowly; however, users are enthusiastic about their applications in this subspecialty. Spinal surgery often requires fine manipulation of vital structures that must be accessed via limited surgical corridors and can require repetitive tasks over lengthy periods of time - issues for which robotic assistance is well-positioned to complement human ability. To date, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved 7 robotic systems across 4 companies for use in spinal surgery. The available clinical data evaluating their efficacy have generally demonstrated these systems to be accurate and safe. A critical next step in the broader adoption of surgical robotics in spine surgery is the design and implementation of rigorous comparative studies to interrogate the utility of robotic assistance. Here we discuss current applications of robotics in spine surgery, review robotic systems FDA-approved for use in spine surgery, summarize randomized controlled trials involving robotics in spine surgery, and comment on prospects of robotic-assisted spine surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bowen Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Tej D Azad
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Ethan Cottrill
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Corinna C Zygourakis
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Alex M Zhu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | | | - Nicholas Theodore
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Navigated robotic assistance results in improved screw accuracy and positive clinical outcomes: an evaluation of the first 54 cases. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:431-437. [PMID: 31396848 PMCID: PMC7237393 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01007-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Computer-aided navigation and robotic guidance systems have become widespread in their utilization for spine surgery. A recent innovation combines these two advances, which theoretically provides accuracy in spinal screw placement. This study describes the cortical and pedicle screw accuracy for the first 54 cases where navigated robotic assistance was used in a surgical setting. This is a retrospective chart review of the initial 54 patients undergoing spine surgery with pedicle and cortical screws using robotic guidance with navigation. A computed tomography (CT)-based Gertzbein and Robbins System (GRS) was used to classify pedicle screw accuracy. Screw tip, tail, and angulation offsets were measured using image overlay analysis. Screw malposition, reposition, and return to operating room rates were collected. 1 of the first 54 cases was a revision surgery and was excluded from the study. Ten screws were placed without the robot due to surgeon discretion and were excluded for the data analysis of 292 screws. Only 0.68% (2/292) of the robot-assisted screws was repositioned based on surgeon discretion. Based on the GRS CT-based grading, 98.3% (287/292) were graded A or B, 1.0% (3/292) screws were graded C, and only 0.7% (2/292) screws was graded D. The average offset from preoperative plan to actual final placement was 1.9 mm from the tip, 2.3 mm from the tail, and 2.8° of angulation. In the first 53 cases, 292 screws placed with navigated robotic assistance resulted in a high level of accuracy (98.3%), adequate screw offsets from planned trajectory, and zero complications.
Collapse
|