The impact of multijoint symptoms on patient-reported disability following surgery for lumbar spine osteoarthritis

Risk of Subsequent Fusion After Isolated Decompression of Lumbar Facet Cysts

INTRODUCTION

Lumbar facet cysts represent a potential source of nerve root compression in elderly patients. Isolated decompression without fusion has proven to be a reasonable treatment option in properly indicated patients. However, the risk of lumbar fusion after isolated decompression and facet cyst excision has yet to be elucidated.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was reviewed for patients undergoing isolated laminectomy for lumbar facet cyst from January 2015 to December 2018 using Current Procedural Terminology coding. Patients undergoing concomitant fusion or additional decompression, as well as those diagnosed with preexisting spondylolisthesis or without a minimum of 5-year follow-up, were excluded. Rates of subsequent lumbar fusion and potential risk factors for subsequent fusion were identified. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, chi square test, and multivariate logistic regression. Results were considered significant at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

In total, 10,707 patients were ultimately included for analysis. At 5-year follow-up, 727 (6.79%) of patients underwent subsequent lumbar fusion after initial isolated decompression. Of these, 301 (2.81% of total patients, 41.4% of fusion patients) underwent fusion within the first year after decompression. Multivariate analysis identified chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and osteoarthritis as risk factors for requiring subsequent lumbar fusion at 5 years following the index decompression procedure ( P < 0.033; all).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing isolated decompression for lumbar facet cysts undergo subsequent lumbar fusion at a 5-year rate of 6.79%. Risk factors for subsequent decompression include chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and osteoarthritis. This study will assist spine surgeons in appropriately counseling patients on expected postoperative course and potential risks of isolated decompression.

Multiple joint osteoarthritis (MJOA): What's in a name?

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current state of the literature regarding multi-joint osteoarthritis (MJOA) and discuss important future directions.

DESIGN

A narrative review of the author's work and other key references on this topic with a focus on the Johnston County studies, definitions of MJOA and their impact, multi-site pain in osteoarthritis (OA), genetics and biomarkers in MJOA, and perspectives on future work.

RESULTS

MJOA is variably defined and lacks a clear consensus definition, making comprehensive study challenging. Involvement of both symptoms and structural changes of OA in multiple joints in an individual is common, but patterns vary by sex, race/ethnicity, and other factors. Outcomes (e.g., general health, function, falls, mortality) are negatively impacted by a greater whole-body OA burden. Recent genetic and biomarker studies including whole-body OA assessments have begun to shed some light on potentially unique factors in the MJOA population.

CONCLUSIONS

Consideration of MJOA is essential for ongoing study of OA phenotypes, epidemiology, risk factors, genetics, biomarkers, and outcomes, to fully understand and eventually limit the negative impact of OA burden on health.

Osteoarthritis year in review 2023: Epidemiology & therapy

OBJECTIVE

To highlight some important findings from osteoarthritis (OA) epidemiology and therapy research undertaken over the past year.

METHODS

Search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases between April 1, 2022 to March 3, 2023 using "exp *Osteoarthritis/" as the preliminary search term. The search was limited to articles published in English and including human subjects. Final inclusions were based on perceived importance and results that may inform improved identification of risk factors or OA treatments, as well as OA subgroups of potential relevance to risk factors or treatment approaches.

RESULTS

3182 studies were screened, leaving 208 eligible for inclusion. This narrative review of thirty-three selected studies was arranged into: a) OA predictors - population-based studies, b) Specific predictors of OA and OA outcome; c) Intra-articular injections, and d) OA phenotypes. There was some suggestion of sex differences in predictors of incidence or outcomes. Body mass index changes appear largely to affect knee OA outcomes. Evidence points to a lack of benefit of viscosupplementation in knee OA; findings were variable for other injectables. Studies of OA phenotypes reveal potentially relevant clinical and pathophysiological differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying risk factors for the incidence/progression of OA represents an ongoing and important area of OA research. Sex may play a role in this understanding and bears consideration and further study. For knee injectables other than viscosupplementation, additional high-quality trials appear warranted. Continued investigation and application of phenotyping across the OA disease, illness and care spectrum may be key to developing disease-modifying agents and their appropriate selection for individuals.

Frequency of multisite non-hand joint involvement in patients with thumb-base osteoarthritis, and associations with functional and patient-reported outcomes

Purpose

In OA studies, the focus often is on an index-joint; other affected joint sites are often overlooked. In this thumb-base OA study, we documented the frequency of symptomatic non-hand joint sites and investigated whether their count was associated with thumb-specific functional and patient-reported outcome measures.

Design

Patients seeking care for thumb-base OA (conservative or surgical) were included. A patient-completed questionnaire captured sociodemographic and health characteristics, symptomatic hand and non-hand joint sites, and outcome measures (thumb-base pain intensity, symptoms and disability (TASD) and upper-extremity disability/symptoms (quickDASH)). Grip and pinch strength were measured. Linear regressions examined the association between each outcome and symptomatic joint site count, adjusted for several covariates.

Results

The mean age of the 145 patients was 62 years, 72% were female. Mean symptomatic non-hand joint site count was 3.6. Ten percent reported only their hands as symptomatic; 30% reported 2-3 other symptomatic sites, and 49% reported 4+. From cross-sectional multivariable analyses, a higher symptomatic non-hand joint site count was associated with worse scores for all patient-reported outcomes and grip strength. Every unit increase in joint site count (49% had a 4+ count) was associated with a 2.1-3.3 unit increase (worse) in patient-reported outcome scores (all p ​< ​0.02).

Conclusions

In this sample, nearly 80% of patients had 2+ symptomatic non-hand joint sites. These symptoms were associated with worse thumb- and hand-specific outcomes, suggesting a need for awareness of whole body OA burden, with implications for outcome score interpretations, study designs, and provision of care in thumb-base OA.

Development and temporal validation of clinical prediction models for 1-year disability and pain after lumbar decompressive surgery. The Norwich Lumbar Surgery Predictor (development version)

PURPOSE

To identify clinical predictors and build prediction models for 1-year patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) after lumbar decompressive surgery for disc herniation or spinal stenosis.

METHODS

The study included 1835 cases, with or without additional single-level fusion, from a single centre from 2008 through 2020. General linear models imputed with 37 clinical variables identified 18 significant 1-year PROM predictors for retention in development models. Interaction of surgical indication with each predictor was tested. Temporal validation was conducted at the same centre on cases through 2021. R2 was used to measure goodness-of-fit, and area under curve (AUC) used to measure classification to a satisfactory symptom state (Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) ≤ 22; back or leg pain ≤ 30 out of 100).

RESULTS

A total 1228 (67%) had complete data for inclusion in model development. Predictors of ODI were baseline PROMs (ODI, back pain, leg pain), work status, condition duration, previous lumbar operation, multiple-joint osteoarthritis, female, diabetes, current smoker, rheumatic disorder, lower limb arthroplasty, mobility aided, provider status, facet cyst, scoliosis, and age, with BMI significantly associated with stenosis. Temporal validation (n = 188) found the ODI model R2 was 0.29 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.18-0.40) and AUC was 0.74 (95% CI 0.67-0.81). Back and leg pain models had lower R2 (0.12-0.14) and AUC (0.68-0.69) values.

CONCLUSION

Important PROM predictors are baseline PROMs, specific co-morbidities, work status, condition duration, previous lumbar operation, female, and smoking status. The ODI model predicted the likelihood of achieving a satisfactory state of both disability and pain.

Characteristics associated with comorbid lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms in people with knee or hip osteoarthritis: an analysis of 9,136 good life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®) participants

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have found that lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) often co-occurs with knee or hip OA and can impact treatment response. However, it is unclear what participant characteristics may be helpful in identifying individuals with these co-occurring conditions. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to explore characteristics associated with comorbid symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in people with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) enrolled in a primary care education and exercise program.

METHODS

Sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, health status measures, and a self-report questionnaire on the presence of LSS symptoms was collected at baseline from the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark primary care program for knee and hip OA. Cross-sectional associations between characteristics and the presence of comorbid LSS symptoms were assessed separately in participants with primary complaint of knee and hip OA, using domain-specific logistic models and a logistic model including all characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 6,541 participants with a primary complaint of knee OA and 2,595 participants with a primary complaint of hip OA were included, of which 40% and 50% reported comorbid LSS symptoms, respectively. LSS symptoms were associated with similar characteristics in knee and hip OA. Sick leave was the only sociodemographic variable consistently associated with LSS symptoms. For clinical characteristics, back pain, longer symptom duration and bilateral or comorbid knee or hip symptoms were also consistently associated. Health status measures were not consistently related to LSS symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Comorbid LSS symptoms in people with knee or hip OA undergoing a primary care treatment program of group-based education and exercise were common and associated with a similar set of characteristics. These characteristics may help to identify people with co-occurring LSS and knee or hip OA, which can be used to help guide clinical decision-making.

Myofascial Pain as an Unseen Comorbidity in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVE

This review aimed to identify, summarize, and appraise the evidence supporting the coexistence of myofascial pain (MPS) and trigger points (MTrP) in osteoarthritis (OA), and the effectiveness of MTrPs treatments in OA-related pain and physical function outcomes.

METHODS

Three databases were searched from inception to June 2022. We included observational and experimental studies to fulfill our 2 study aims. Two independent reviewers conducted 2-phase screening procedures and risk of bias using checklist tools for cross-sectional, quasi-experimental, and randomized control trials. Patient characteristics, findings of active and latent MTrPs in relevant muscles, treatments, and pain and physical function outcomes were extracted from low-risk bias studies.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 2898 articles, of which 6 observational and 7 experimental studies had a low bias risk and the data extracted. Active MTrPs in knee OA patients was more evident in the quadriceps and hamstring muscles than in healthy individuals. Dry needling on active MTrPs improved pain and physical function in the short term compared with sham treatment in hip OA patients. In knee OA, dry needling on latent or active MTrPs improved pain and functional outcomes compared with sham needling but did not result in better pain and physical outcomes when combined with a physical exercise program.

DISCUSSION

The presence of active versus latent MTrPs seems to be a more sensitive discriminating feature of OA given that latent is often present in OA and healthy individuals. Dry needling on active MTrPs improved pain and physical function in the short term compared with sham treatment in hip OA patients. However, the small sample size and the few number of studies limit any firm recommendation on the treatment.

REGISTRY

The study protocol was prospectively registered in Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/8DVU3).

Osteoarthritis year in review 2022: epidemiology & therapy

This 'Year in Review' provides a synopsis of key research themes and individual studies from the clinical osteoarthritis (OA) field, focused on epidemiology and therapy. The electronic database search for the review was adapted from the 2021 year in review search, to increase search specificity for relevant study designs, and was conducted in Medline, Embase and medRxiv (31^st March 2021 to 4^th March 2022). Following screening for eligibility, studies were grouped according to their key research design, including reviews, cohorts and randomised trials. 11 key themes emerged, including the importance of several comorbidities in predicting OA incidence and prevalence, surgical approaches that can reduce the risk of post-traumatic OA, the heterogenous but nevertheless relatively stable nature of OA subgroup trajectories, the paucity of robust studies particularly of surgery for OA and the very modest benefit of many therapies under evaluation in trials. A particular interest of the authors was to consider whether new studies are helping determine how to better ensure the right patient with OA is matched to the right treatment at the right time. There are several new studies developing improved predictive models through big data analytics and machine learning which show promise, need validation, and may support new approaches to stratified care.

Intervertebral disc degeneration and osteoarthritis: a common molecular disease spectrum

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) and osteoarthritis (OA) affecting the facet joint of the spine are biomechanically interdependent, typically occur in tandem, and have considerable epidemiological and pathophysiological overlap. Historically, the distinctions between these degenerative diseases have been emphasized. Therefore, research in the two fields often occurs independently without adequate consideration of the co-dependence of the two sites, which reside within the same functional spinal unit. Emerging evidence from animal models of spine degeneration highlight the interdependence of IDD and facet joint OA, warranting a review of the parallels between these two degenerative phenomena for the benefit of both clinicians and research scientists. This Review discusses the pathophysiological aspects of IDD and OA, with an emphasis on tissue, cellular and molecular pathways of degeneration. Although the intervertebral disc and synovial facet joint are biologically distinct structures that are amenable to reductive scientific consideration, substantial overlap exists between the molecular pathways and processes of degeneration (including cartilage destruction, extracellular matrix degeneration and osteophyte formation) that occur at these sites. Thus, researchers, clinicians, advocates and policy-makers should consider viewing the burden and management of spinal degeneration holistically as part of the OA disease continuum.

Association of presurgical circulating MicroRNAs with 1-year postsurgical pain reduction in spine facet osteoarthritis patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Purpose

Up to 30% of spine facet osteoarthritis patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (SF-OA ​+ ​LSS) have little to no improvement in their pain after surgery. Lack of meaningful improvement in pain following surgery provides a unique opportunity to identify specific predictive biomarker signatures that might be associated with the outcomes of surgical treatment. The objective of the present study was to determine whether a microRNA (miRNA) biomarker signature could be identified in presurgical blood plasma that corresponded with levels of SF-OA ​+ ​LSS patient post-surgical pain intensity one year later.

Methods

RNA was extracted from baseline plasma of SF-OA ​+ ​LSS patients and prepared for miRNA sequencing. Statistical approaches were performed to identify differentially expressed miRNAs associated with reduced 1-year postsurgical pain (n ​= ​56). Using an integrated computational approach, we further created predicted gene and pathway networks for each identified miRNA.

Results

We identified a panel of 4 circulating candidate miRNAs (hsa-miR-155-5p, hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa-miR-125a-5p, hsa-miR-99b-5p) with higher levels at presurgical baseline that were associated with greater changes in % NPRS20Δ, reflecting reduced pain intensity levels at one year. Genes encoding hsa-let-7e-5p, hsa-miR-125a-5p, and hsa-miR-99b-5p are part of an evolutionarily conserved miRNA cluster. Using integrated computational analyses, we showed that mammalian target of rapamycin, transforming growth factor-β1 receptor, Wnt signaling, epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulators, and cholecystokinin signaling were enriched pathways of predicted gene targets.

Conclusions

Taken together, our findings suggest that 4 presurgical baseline circulating miRNAs correlate with 1-year postsurgical SF-OA ​+ ​LSS patient pain intensity and represent possible candidate biomarker signature of surgical pain response.

Prevalence of multimorbid degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Musculoskeletal multimorbidity is common and coexisting lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) has been reported. The aim of this review was to report the prevalence of multimorbid degenerative LSS with knee or hip OA based on clinical and/or imaging case definitions.

METHODS

Literature searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL up to May 2021. Studies involving adults with cross-sectional data to estimate the prevalence of co-occurring LSS with knee or hip OA were included. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Results were stratified according to index and comorbid condition, and by case definitions (imaging, clinical, and combined).

RESULTS

Ten studies from five countries out of 3891 citations met the inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from 44 to 2,857,999 (median 230) and the mean age in the included studies range from 61 to 73 years (median 66 years). All studies were from secondary care or mixed settings. Nine studies used a combined definition of LSS and one used a clinical definition. Imaging, clinical, and combined case definitions of knee and hip OA were used. The prevalence of multimorbid LSS and knee or hip OA ranged from 0 to 54%, depending on the specified index condition and case definitions used. Six studies each provided prevalence data for index LSS and comorbid knee OA (prevalence range: 5 to 41%) and comorbid hip OA (prevalence range: 2 to 35%). Two studies provided prevalence data for index knee OA and comorbid LSS (prevalence range 17 to 54%). No studies reporting prevalence data for index hip OA and comorbid LSS were found. Few studies used comparable case definitions and all but one study were rated as high risk of bias.

CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that multimorbid LSS with knee or hip OA occurs in people (0 to 54%), although results are based on studies with high risk of bias and surgical populations. Variability in LSS and OA case definitions limit the comparability of studies and prevalence estimates should therefore be interpreted with caution.

REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ( CRD42020177759 ).

Symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis in people with knee or hip osteoarthritis or low back pain: a cross-sectional study of 10,234 participants in primary care

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to evaluate: the proportion of people reporting symptoms associated with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in primary care programs for knee or hip osteoarthritis (OA) or persistent low back pain (LBP) and; the prevalence of self-reported clinical LSS in these three cohorts, according to two sets of adapted criteria.

METHOD

A cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark primary care programs. Self-report LSS symptom questions were administered to participants with knee OA, hip OA, and persistent LBP. The prevalence of eleven LSS symptoms and clinical LSS were calculated for each cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 10,234 participants were included in the analysis. A similar proportion of participants in each cohort were female (69%), with a 6- and 7-year older mean age in the knee and hip cohorts compared to the back cohort. A greater proportion of participants with LBP reported LSS symptoms (range 11-71%) than in the hip (11-50%) and knee (8-40%) cohorts. This pattern was observed for all but one symptom. The same pattern was observed for the prevalence of clinical LSS with less than 10% of people in each cohort satisfying the clinical criteria.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported LSS symptoms are commonly reported by people treated in primary care for knee or hip OA, although not as frequently as reported by those with LBP. Despite symptoms of LSS being common, only a small proportion of people were classified as having self-reported clinical LSS.

Impact of Advanced Age on Postoperative Outcomes Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

INTRODUCTION

Age 65 years or older is considered a risk factor for worse outcomes after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). However, few studies have differentiated this cohort from younger patients. This study compares postoperative outcomes among patients 65 years or older of age with a younger cohort after minimally invasive (MIS) TLIF.

METHODS

A database was reviewed for adults undergoing primary, elective, single-level MIS TLIF procedures for degenerative pathology from 2008 to 2019. Outcomes included visual analogue scale (VAS) for back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Short Form 12-Item physical component score (SF-12 PCS), and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System physical function. Outcomes were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were categorized as ≥75 years, 65 to 74 years, or <65 years of age. Propensity score matching was performed, and outcome improvement and minimum clinically important difference (MCID) achievement were evaluated by group. MCID achievement was calculated using previously established values.

RESULTS

Our cohort included 51 patients aged younger than 65 years, 47 patients aged 65 to 74 years, and 16 patients aged 75 years or older. No significant perioperative differences or complications existed between groups. The 65- to 74-year group improved in VAS back, leg, and ODI from 6 weeks to 1 year (all P < 0.001) and SF-12 PCS at 12 weeks to 1 year (all P < 0.005). VAS back, ODI, and SF-12 PCS differed between groups preoperatively (P < 0.050), and VAS back and ODI varied at 6 weeks (P < 0.01). VAS leg differed between groups at 12 weeks and SF-12 PCS at 1 year (both P < 0.050). MCID achievement was similar between groups except for VAS leg at 6 weeks (P = 0.038) and 12 weeks (P = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Patients 65 years or older of age markedly improved from baseline, similarly to younger patients. Postoperative outcome scores and MCID achievement demonstrated differences between groups at intermittent timepoints. With appropriate selection criteria, patient age may not act as a notable risk factor for successful MIS TLIF procedures.