1
|
He S, Shepherd H, Butow P, Shaw J, Harris M, Faris M, Girgis A, Rankin N. Fidelity and acceptability of implementation strategies developed for adherence to a clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in adults with cancer. Arch Public Health 2024; 82:65. [PMID: 38711115 DOI: 10.1186/s13690-024-01293-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implementation strategies are crucial to facilitate implementation success. To prepare and support implementation of a clinical pathway for screening, assessment and management of anxiety and depression in cancer patients (the ADAPT CP), six broad categories of implementation strategies; (1) Awareness campaigns, (2) Champions, (3) Education, (4) Academic Detailing and Support, (5) Reporting, (6) Technological Support, were developed. The aim of this paper is to describe the fidelity and acceptability of six categories of implementation strategies and any subsequent changes/adaptations made to those strategies. METHODS The ADAPT CP was implemented in twelve cancer services in NSW, Australia, as part of a cluster randomised controlled trial of core versus enhanced implementation strategies. Fidelity to and any subsequent changes to the delivery of the planned six categories of implementation strategies were captured using the ADAPT contact log, which recorded the contacts made between the ADAPT research team and services, engagement meetings and monthly meetings. To explore acceptability and awareness/engagement with the implementation strategies, interviews with a purposively selected staff sample across both study arms were held prior to implementation (T0), six months into implementation (T1) and at the end of the 12-month implementation period (T2). Interviews were thematically analysed across the six categories of strategies. RESULTS Delivery of all six categories of implementation strategies as planned was moderated by service context and resources and staff engagement. As such, for some implementation strategies, subsequent changes or adaptations to the content, mode of delivery, frequency and duration such as abbreviated training sessions, were made to optimise fidelity to and engagement with the strategies. Most strategies were perceived to be acceptable by service staff. Use of strategies prior to implementation of the ADAPT CP such as the engagement meetings and training sessions, positively impacted on ownership and preparedness to implement the ADAPT CP. Furthermore, ongoing support such as provision of additional training or monthly meetings facilitated increased awareness and engagement with the ADAPT program. CONCLUSION Flexibility in delivering implementation strategies, and ensuring staff engagement with, and acceptability of those strategies, can support implementation of interventions within healthcare settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION The ADAPT CRCT was registered prospectively with the ANZCTR on 22/3/2017. Trial ID ACTRN12617000411347. https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372486&isReview=true.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sharon He
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Heather Shepherd
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
- Susan Wakil School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Phyllis Butow
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Joanne Shaw
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Marnie Harris
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Mona Faris
- Psycho-Oncology Co-operative Research Group (PoCoG), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia
| | - Afaf Girgis
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicole Rankin
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3052, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pence BW, Gaynes BN, Udedi M, Kulisewa K, Zimba CC, Akiba CF, Dussault JM, Akello H, Malava JK, Crampin A, Zhang Y, Preisser JS, DeLong SM, Hosseinipour MC. Two implementation strategies to support the integration of depression screening and treatment into hypertension and diabetes care in Malawi (SHARP): parallel, cluster-randomised, controlled, implementation trial. Lancet Glob Health 2024; 12:e652-e661. [PMID: 38408462 PMCID: PMC10995959 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00592-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Revised: 12/02/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although evidence-based treatments for depression in low-resource settings are established, implementation strategies to scale up these treatments remain poorly defined. We aimed to compare two implementation strategies in achieving high-quality integration of depression care into chronic medical care and improving mental health outcomes in patients with hypertension and diabetes. METHODS We conducted a parallel, cluster-randomised, controlled, implementation trial in ten health facilities across Malawi. Facilities were randomised (1:1) by covariate-constrained randomisation to either an internal champion alone (ie, basic strategy group) or an internal champion plus external supervision with audit and feedback (ie, enhanced strategy group). Champions integrated a three-element, evidence-based intervention into clinical care: universal depression screening; peer-delivered psychosocial counselling; and algorithm-guided, non-specialist antidepressant management. External supervision involved structured facility visits by Ministry officials and clinical experts to assess quality of care and provide supportive feedback approximately every 4 months. Eligible participants were adults (aged 18-65 years) seeking hypertension and diabetes care with signs of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 score ≥5). Primary implementation outcomes were depression screening fidelity, treatment initiation fidelity, and follow-up treatment fidelity over the first 3 months of treatment, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03711786, and is complete. FINDINGS Five (50%) facilities were randomised to the basic strategy and five (50%) to the enhanced strategy. Between Oct 1, 2019, and Nov 30, 2021, in the basic group, 587 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 301 were enrolled; in the enhanced group, 539 patients were assessed, of whom 288 were enrolled. All clinics integrated the evidence-based intervention and were included in the analyses. Of 60 774 screening-eligible visits, screening fidelity was moderate (58% in the enhanced group vs 53% in the basic group; probability difference 5% [95% CI -38% to 47%]; p=0·84) and treatment initiation fidelity was high (99% vs 98%; 0% [-3% to 3%]; p=0·89) in both groups. However, treatment follow-up fidelity was substantially higher in the enhanced group than in the basic group (82% vs 20%; 62% [36% to 89%]; p=0·0020). Depression remission was higher in the enhanced group than in the basic group (55% vs 36%; 19% [3% to 34%]; p=0·045). Serious adverse events were nine deaths (five in the basic group and four in the enhanced group) and 26 hospitalisations (20 in the basic group and six in the enhanced group); none were treatment-related. INTERPRETATION The enhanced implementation strategy led to an increase in fidelity in providers' follow-up treatment actions and in rates of depression remission, consistent with the literature that follow-up decisions are crucial to improving depression outcomes in integrated care models. These findings suggest that external supervision combined with an internal champion could offer an important advance in integrating depression treatment into general medical care in low-resource settings. FUNDING The National Institute of Mental Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian W Pence
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Bradley N Gaynes
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael Udedi
- Division of Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health, Ministry of Health, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Kazione Kulisewa
- Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | | | | | | | - Jullita K Malava
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Amelia Crampin
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - John S Preisser
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie M DeLong
- Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Mina C Hosseinipour
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; UNC Project Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yanguela J, Pence BW, Udedi M, Banda JC, Kulisewa K, Zimba CC, Malava JK, Akiba C, Dussault JM, Morrison AM, Mphonda S, Hosseinipour MC, Gaynes BN, Wheeler SB. Implementation strategies to build mental health-care capacity in Malawi: a health-economic evaluation. Lancet Glob Health 2024; 12:e662-e671. [PMID: 38408461 PMCID: PMC10958395 DOI: 10.1016/s2214-109x(23)00597-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Depression is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Due to low system capacity, three in four patients with depression in sub-Saharan Africa go untreated. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the cost-effectiveness of implementation strategies to scale up evidence-based depression treatment in the region. In this study, we investigate the cost-effectiveness of two different implementation strategies to integrate the Friendship Bench approach and measurement-based care in non-communicable disease clinics in Malawi. METHODS The two implementation strategies tested in this study are part of a trial, in which ten clinics were randomly assigned (1:1) to a basic implementation package consisting of an internal coordinator acting as a champion (IC-only group) or to an enhanced package that complemented the basic package with quarterly external supervision, and audit and feedback of intervention delivery (IC + ES group). We included material costs, training costs, costs related to project-wide meetings, transportation and medication costs, time costs related to internal champion activities and depression screening or treatment, and costs of external supervision visits if applicable. Outcomes included the number of patients screened with the patient health questionnaire 2 (PHQ-2), cases of remitted depression at 3 and 12 months, and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) averted. We compared the cost-effectiveness of both packages to the status quo (ie, no intervention) using a micro-costing-informed decision-tree model. FINDINGS Relative to the status quo, IC + ES would be on average US$10 387 ($1349-$17 365) more expensive than IC-only but more effective in achieving remission and averting DALYs. The cost per additional remission would also be lower with IC + ES than IC-only at 3 months ($119 vs $223) and 12 months ($210 for IC + ES; IC-only dominated by the status quo at 12 months). Neither package would be cost-effective under the willingness-to-pay threshold of $65 per DALY averted currently used by the Malawian Ministry of Health. However, the IC + ES package would be cost-effective in relation to the commonly used threshold of three times per-capita gross domestic product per DALY averted. INTERPRETATION Investing in supporting champions might be an appropriate use of resources. Although not currently cost-effective by Malawian willingness-to-pay standards compared with the status quo, the IC + ES package would probably be a cost-effective way to build mental health-care capacity in resource-constrained settings in which decision makers use higher willingness-to-pay thresholds. FUNDING National Institute of Mental Health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Yanguela
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Brian W Pence
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael Udedi
- Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health Division, Malawi Ministry of Health and Population, Department of Clinical Services, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Jonathan Chiwanda Banda
- Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health Division, Malawi Ministry of Health and Population, Department of Clinical Services, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Kazione Kulisewa
- Department of Mental Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | - Jullita K Malava
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Chilumba, Karonga District, Malawi
| | | | | | - Abigail M Morrison
- Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Steve Mphonda
- University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Mina C Hosseinipour
- University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Lilongwe, Malawi; Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Bradley N Gaynes
- Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Stephanie B Wheeler
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jensen-Doss A, Casline E, Woodard GS, Phillips DA, Lane E, Palafu T, Waye C, Ramirez V, Cheron DM, Okamura K. Provider Use of, Attitudes Towards, and Self-efficacy with Key Measurement-based Care Practices in Youth Mental Health Treatment: A Multi-site Examination. ADMINISTRATION AND POLICY IN MENTAL HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH 2024:10.1007/s10488-024-01354-6. [PMID: 38334881 DOI: 10.1007/s10488-024-01354-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Measurement-based care (MBC) is an underutilized evidence-based practice, and current implementation efforts demonstrate limited success in increasing MBC use. A better understanding of MBC implementation determinants is needed to improve these efforts, particularly from studies examining the full range of MBC practices and that span multiple samples of diverse providers using different MBC systems. This study addressed these limitations by conducting a multi-site survey examining MBC predictors and use in youth treatment. Participants were 159 clinicians and care coordinators working in youth mental health care settings across the United States. Participants were drawn from three program evaluations of MBC implementation. Providers completed measures assessing use of five MBC practices (administering measures, viewing feedback, reviewing feedback in supervision, sharing feedback with clients in session, and using feedback to plan treatment), MBC self-efficacy, and MBC attitudes. Despite expectations that MBC should be standard care for all clients, providers reported only administering measures to 40-60% of clients on average, with practices related to the use of feedback falling in the 1-39% range. Higher MBC self-efficacy and more positive views of MBC practicality predicted higher MBC use, although other attitude measures were not significant predictors. Effects of predictors were not moderated by site, suggesting consistent predictors across implementation settings. Implications of study findings for future research and for the implementation of MBC are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elizabeth Casline
- Center for Dissemination and Implementation Science, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, US
| | - Grace S Woodard
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | | | - Elizabeth Lane
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Tessa Palafu
- The Baker Center for Children and Families, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Catherine Waye
- The Baker Center for Children and Families, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Kelsie Okamura
- The Baker Center for Children and Families, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sansbury GM, Pence BW, Zimba C, Yanguela J, Landrum K, Matewere M, Mbota M, Malava JK, Tikhiwa H, Morrison AM, Akiba CF, Gaynes BN, Udedi M, Hosseinipour MC, Stockton MA. Improving integrated depression and non-communicable disease care in Malawi through engaged leadership and supportive implementation climate. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1413. [PMID: 38098079 PMCID: PMC10722817 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10344-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low- and middle-income countries often lack access to mental health services, leading to calls for integration within other primary care systems. In sub-Saharan Africa, integration of depression treatment in non-communicable disease (NCD) settings is feasible, acceptable, and effective. However, leadership and implementation climate challenges often hinder effective integration and quality of services. The aim of this study was to identify discrete leadership strategies that facilitate overcoming barriers to the integration of depression care in NCD clinics in Malawi and to understand how clinic leadership shapes the implementation climate. METHODS We conducted 39 in-depth interviews with the District Medical Officer, the NCD coordinator, one NCD provider, and the research assistant from each of the ten Malawian NCD clinics (note one District Medical Officer served two clinics). Based on semi-structured interview guides, participants were asked their perspectives on the impact of leadership and implementation climate on overcoming barriers to integrating depression care into existing NCD services. Thematic analysis used both inductive and deductive approaches to identify emerging themes and compare among participant type. RESULTS The results revealed how engaged leadership can fuel a positive implementation climate where clinics had heightened capacity to overcome implementation barriers. Effective leaders were approachable and engaged in daily operations of the clinic and problem-solving. They held direct involvement with and mentorship during the intervention, providing assistance in patient screening and consultation with treatment plans. Different levels of leadership utilized their respective standings and power dynamics to influence provider attitudes and perceptions surrounding the intervention. Leaders acted by informing providers about the intervention source and educating them on the importance of mental healthcare, as it was often undervalued. Lastly, they prioritized teamwork and collective ownership for the intervention, increasing provider responsibility. CONCLUSION Training that prioritizes leadership visibility and open communication will facilitate ongoing Malawi Ministry of Health efforts to scale up evidence-based depression treatment within NCD clinics. This proves useful where extensive and external monitoring may be limited. Ultimately, these results can inform successful strategies to close implementation gaps to achieve integration of mental health services in low-resource settings through improved leadership and implementation climate. TRIAL REGISTRATION These findings are reported from ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03711786. Registered on 18/10/2018. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03711786 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Griffin M Sansbury
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi.
| | - Brian W Pence
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Chifundo Zimba
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Juan Yanguela
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 1101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7411, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7411, USA
| | - Kelsey Landrum
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Maureen Matewere
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - MacDonald Mbota
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Jullita K Malava
- Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MEIRU), P.O. Box 46, Chilumba, Karonga District, Malawi
| | - Harriet Tikhiwa
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
| | - Abigail M Morrison
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| | - Christopher F Akiba
- RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA
| | - Bradley N Gaynes
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
- Division of Global Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 101 Manning Dr #1, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Michael Udedi
- Malawi Ministry of Health and Population, Non-Communicable Diseases and Mental Health Clinical Services, P.O. Box 30377, Lilongwe, 3, Malawi
| | - Mina C Hosseinipour
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, 101 Manning Dr #1, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
| | - Melissa A Stockton
- Tidziwe Centre, University of North Carolina Project-Malawi, Private Bag A-104, Lilongwe, Malawi
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 135 Dauer Drive, 2101 McGavran-Greenberg Hall, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7440, USA
| |
Collapse
|