Is there a role for systematic hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A review of 17 years of experience in a tertiary institution

Impact of Tumor Size on the Survival Benefit of Anatomic Versus Non-Anatomic Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of anatomic resection (AR) versus non-anatomic resection (NAR) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has not been thoroughly investigated. This study sought to define the impact of tumor size on the relative therapeutic benefit of AR versus NAR for ICC. Specifically, the study aimed to identify a threshold tumor size to define when AR rather than NAR may be warranted to achieve better survival outcomes for patients undergoing resection of ICC.

METHODS

Patients who underwent liver resection for ICC were identified from an international multi-institutional database. A multivariable Cox model with an interaction term was used to assess the relationship between tumor size and the survival impact of AR.

RESULTS

Among 969 patients, 506 (72.9 %) underwent AR, whereas 263 (27.1 %) had an NAR. Multivariable analysis demonstrated an interaction between tumor size and AR (hazard ratio [HR], 0.94; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.00; p = 0.045). A plot of the interaction demonstrated that AR was associated with improved outcomes for tumors size ≥4 cm. Among 257 (26.5 %) patients with tumors smaller than 4 cm, recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not differ between NAR and AR (3-year RFS: 65.2 % [95 % CI, 55.7-76.2] vs 58.1 % [95 % CI, 49.2-68.5]; p = 0.720). In contrast, among 712 (73.4 %) patients with tumors size ≥4 cm, AR was associated with improved RFS (3-year RFS: 34.7 % [95 % CI, 27.5-43.8] vs 44.9 % [95 % CI, 40.4-50.0]; p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic resection was associated with improved RFS for ICC patients with tumors size ≥4 cm, indicating that tumor size may be a valuable criterion to determine the extent of liver resection for resectable ICC patients.

Surgical management, including the role of transplantation, for intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma are life threatening disease with poor outcomes despite optimal treatment currently available (5-year overall survival following resection 20-35%, and <10% cured at 10-years post resection). The insidious onset makes diagnosis difficult, the majority do not have a resection option and the high recurrence rate post-resection suggests that occult metastatic disease is frequently present. Advances in perioperative management, such as ipsilateral portal vein (and hepatic vein) embolisation methods to increase the future liver remnant volume, genomic profiling, and (neo)adjuvant therapies demonstrate great potential in improving outcomes. However multiple areas of controversy exist. Surgical resection rate and outcomes vary between centres with no global consensus on how 'resectable' disease is defined - molecular profiling and genomic analysis could potentially identify patients unlikely to benefit from resection or likely to benefit from targeted therapies. FDG-PET scanning has also improved the ability to detect metastatic disease preoperatively and avoid futile resection. However tumours frequently invade major vasculo-biliary structures, with resection and reconstruction associated with significant morbidity and mortality even in specialist centres. Liver transplantation has been investigated for very selected patients for the last decade and yet the selection algorithm, surgical approach and both value of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies remain to be clarified. In this review, we discuss the contemporary management of intrahepatic and peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Prognostic impact of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

The clinical significance of lymph node dissection (LND) in patients with peripheral type intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unclear. Although LND is usually performed for perihilar type ICC, there is no consensus on whether routine LND should be performed for peripheral type ICC. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of LND in patients who underwent hepatectomy for peripheral type ICC.

METHODS

This study included consecutive patients who underwent macroscopically curative initial hepatectomy for ICC at our hospital from 2000 to 2018. Among them, peripheral type ICCs with the macroscopic appearance of mass-forming (MF) or MF + periductal infiltrating (PI) types were analyzed. Propensity score analyses (1:1 matching and inverse probability treatment weighting) were adopted to adjust confounding variables. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between the LND and no LND (NLND) groups.

RESULTS

During the study period, 201 patients underwent hepatectomy for ICC. The number of peripheral ICC patients with MF type or MF + PI type was 142. The LND group comprised 94 patients and the NLND group comprised 48 patients. The N1 group showed significantly poorer OS and DFS than the N0 and NLND groups (P < 0.001). After propensity score adjustment, there were no significant differences in OS and DFS between the LND and NLND groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis was significant; however, the therapeutic effect of LND was not demonstrated in peripheral type ICC. The indication of LND should be carefully considered on an individual patient basis.

Lymph node metastasis of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: the present and prospect of detection and dissection

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) ranks as the second most primary liver cancer that often goes unnoticed with a high mortality rate. Hepatectomy is the main treatment for ICC, but only 15% of patients are suitable for surgery. Despite advancements in therapeutic approaches, ICC has an unfavorable prognosis, largely due to lymph node metastasis (LNM) that is closely linked to the elevated recurrence rates. Consequently, the identification of precise and suitable techniques for the detection and staging of LNM assumes paramount importance for ICC therapy. While preoperative imaging plays a crucial role in ICC diagnosis, its efficacy in accurately diagnosing LNM remains unsatisfactory. The inclusion of lymph node dissection as part of the hepatectomy procedures is significant for the accurate pathological diagnosis of LNM, although it continues to be a topic of debate. The concept of sentinel lymph node in ICC has presented a novel and potentially valuable approach for diagnosing LNM. This review aims to explore the current state and prospects of LNM in ICC, offering a promising avenue for enhancing the clinical diagnosis and treatment of ICC to improve patient prognosis.

Impact of clinical lymph node status on survival in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma undergoing liver resection plus lymphadenectomy

BACKGROUNDS

Liver resection plus lymphadenectomy is essential to ensure precise staging in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). This study aimed to investigate the influence of the clinical status of lymph nodes on the survival outcomes in ICC patients.

METHODS

Between January 2015 and December 2020, consecutive patients diagnosed with ICC who underwent liver resection plus lymphadenectomy were enrolled. Clinical assessment of lymph node status included positron emission tomography/computed tomography examination by radiologists pre-operatively, alongside intraoperative abdominal examination by the surgical team. Retrospective collection and analysis of clinical information alongside survival data were performed to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included a total of 359 patients, with 291 (81.0%) and 151 (42.1%) displaying clinically and pathologically positive lymph nodes, respectively. The clinical assessment method had a sensitivity of 81.2% and a specificity of 54.3%. Following a median follow-up period of 32 months, the overall survival (OS) rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 69.1%, 50.6%, and 41.2%, respectively, while the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 60.7%, 42.8%, and 40.1%, respectively, across the cohort. Patients who had clinically positive but pathologically negative lymph nodes recorded the highest median OS (52 months) and median DFS (32 months). Conversely, those who were clinically negative but pathologically positive experienced the lowest median OS (16 months) and median DFS (8 months).

CONCLUSION

The current approach to clinically assessing lymph node status in ICC has a significant rate of false positives. Patients with clinically positive but pathologically negative lymph nodes exhibit the most favourable survival outcomes.

Is routine lymph node dissection recommended for liver resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

This meta-analysis aimed to elucidate the therapeutic effects of routine lymph node dissection (LND) with liver resection on intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Databases, including MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched to identify studies comparing LND and non-LND for ICC liver resection. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (DFS), in-hospital morbidity, blood loss, and R0 rate.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies involving 4407 patients were included. The OS did not differ between the LND (n = 2158) and non-LND (n = 2249) groups (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83-1.32). The secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the groups. Subgroup analyses stratified by the risk of bias showed a significant difference in OS between the high- and low-risk groups (P = 0.0008). In the low-risk group, LND (vs. non-LND) was associated with superior OS (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.59-0.98). Most studies in low-risk groups involved patients who were clinically node-negative.

CONCLUSIONS

The therapeutic effects of routine LND for ICC have not been demonstrated. However, LND had a positive impact on OS in studies with a low risk of bias, thus suggesting that there may be a subset of ICC patients who would benefit from LND.

Short-term postoperative outcomes of lymphadenectomy for cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma and colorectal liver metastases in the modern era of liver surgery: Insights from the StuDoQ|Liver registry

INTRODUCTION

The clinical role of lymphadenectomy (LAD) as part of hepatic resection for malignancies of the liver remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to report on the use cases and postoperative outcomes of liver resection and simultaneous LAD for hepatic malignancies (HM).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinicopathological data from patients who underwent surgery at 13 German centers from 2017 to 2022 (n = 3456) was extracted from the StuDoQ|Liver registry of the German Society of General and Visceral Surgery. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed to account for the extent of liver resection and patient demographics.

RESULTS

LAD was performed in 545 (16%) cases. The most common indication for LAD was cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), followed by colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). N+ status was found in 7 (8%), 59 (35%), and 56 cases (35%) for HCC, CCA, and CRLM, respectively (p < 0.001). The LAD rate was highest for robotic-assisted resections (28%) followed by open (26%) and laparoscopic resections (13%), whereas the number of resected lymph nodes was equivalent between the techniques (p = 0.303). LAD was associated with an increased risk of liver-specific postoperative complications, especially for patients with HCC.

CONCLUSION

In this multicenter registry study, LAD was found to be associated with an increased risk of liver-specific complications. The highest rate of LAD was observed among robotic liver resections.

Value of lymph node dissection in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the impact of lymph node dissection (LND) on outcomes following resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane were searched from inception to 30th January 2023 for studies that compared LND with no LND (NLND) among patients with ICC. To limit the effect of unbalanced covariates, only studies that utilized propensity score-based methods were included. Subgroup analysis of patients with clinically node-negative (cN0) ICC was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 3776 patients with ICC, individuals in the LND versus NLND cohorts had comparable overall survival (OS) (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.57-1.06, P = 0.11), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR 0.84, 95 % CI 0.70-1.01, P = 0.07) and risk of major complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95 % CI 0.70-1.62, P = 0.75). Subgroup analysis of cN0 patients, OS was significantly higher in patients who underwent LND (HR 0.61, 95 % CI 0.50-0.74, P < 0.01), with a non-significant trend towards improved DFS (HR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.65-1.01, P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

This study found no differences in long-term survival or morbidity following LND for ICC. Subgroup analysis of cN0 patients, who underwent LND detected improved OS with a trend towards better DFS, compared to patients with NLND.

A case of rapidly progressing sarcomatous intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with suddenly appearing lymph node metastasis

BACKGROUND

The sarcomatous variant of carcinoma is relatively rare in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Sarcomatous ICC (SICC) is associated with a poorer prognosis compared with ICC. SICC is rarely diagnosed before surgery due to non-descriptive findings; it progresses rapidly, resulting in miserable prognosis. Here, we report a case of rapidly progressing SICC that showed a clinically significant tumor growth rate.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 77-year-old woman who had undergone ileocecal resection for cecal cancer 5 years previously was found to have elevated levels of the tumor marker carbohydrate antigen 19-9. Although an abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan did not detect any liver mass lesions until 3 months before this serum examination, the subsequent CT scan revealed a hypodensity 20 mm mass lesion in the right anterior section. Contrast-enhanced CT and magnetic resonance imaging revealed peripheral enhancement in the arterial-to-equilibrium phase. Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography revealed uptake in the lesion. None of the imaging modalities showed lymph node swelling or distant metastases. She underwent hepatectomy under the diagnosis of ICC or an atypical metastasis from previous cecal cancer. Although preoperative images showed no suspicious lymph node metastasis 3 weeks prior, the hilar lymph node swelled 3 cm and contained adenocarcinoma. Consequently, the patient underwent right anterior sectionectomy and lymph node dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament. Histopathological examination revealed that the liver tumor was a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma with sarcomatous pattern. While the patient received adjuvant gemcitabine and S-1 therapy, lymph node metastasis appeared in the mediastinum 13 months after the surgery. She received gemcitabine + cisplatin + S-1 therapy but died 20 months after surgery.

CONCLUSION

SICC and lymph node metastasis clinically appeared within 3 months and 3 weeks, respectively. Suspected ICC that rapidly progresses should be considered SICC and treated with early resection. SICC is often missed in clinical diagnosis and has a poor prognosis, even after curative resection. While an alternative strategy involving preoperative biopsy and neoadjuvant therapy may be beneficial, it should be approached with discretion due to the potential risks of tumor progression and peritoneal dissemination.

Lymph Node Dissection in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: a Critical and Updated Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Lymphatic spread of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is common and negatively impacts survival. However, the precise role of lymph node dissection (LND) in oncologic outcomes for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains to be established.

METHODS

Updated evidence on the preoperative diagnosis and prognostic value of lymph node metastasis is reviewed, as well as the potential benefit of LND in patients with iCCA.

RESULTS

The ability to accurately determine nodal status for iCCA with current imaging modalities is equivocal. LND has prognostic value for both survival and disease recurrence. However, execution rates of LND are highly varied in the literature, ranging from 26.9 to 100%. At least 6 lymph nodes should be examined from nodal stations of the hepatoduodenal ligament and hepatic artery as well as based on the location of the primary tumor. Neoadjuvant therapies may be beneficial if lymph node metastases at diagnosis are suspected. Surgeons performing a minimally invasive approach should focus on increasing LND rates and harvesting ≥ 6 lymph nodes. Lymph node negativity is required in patients with iCCA being considered for liver transplantation under investigational protocols.

CONCLUSION

Despite an upward trend in the LND rate, the reality is that only 10% of patients with iCCA receive an adequate LND. This review underscores the importance of routinely increasing the rate of adequate LND in these patients in order to achieve accurate staging, appropriately select patients for adjuvant therapy, and improve the prognosis of clinical outcomes. While prospective data is lacking, the therapeutic impact of LND remains unknown.

Role of routine lymph node dissection alongside resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The global incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is soaring. Due to often delayed presentation, only a narrow spectrum of the disease is usually surgically resectable. To more accurately stage the disease, reduce recurrence, and improve overall survival, surgical teams are increasingly performing intraoperative lymph node dissection (LND) as well. This procedure has its associated morbidity, while there is no consensus or formal guidelines on its role in this setting. Hence, there is a need to better delineate the evidence for performing LND alongside surgical resection of the ICCA.

AIM

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis on the role of LND in improving prognostication and survival post-resection of ICCA.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature search using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for all studies involving LND, ICCA, and surgical resection using several keywords, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) tags, and appropriate synonyms. All clinical studies comparing curative intent resection of ICCA with LND vs resection without LND were included, while single-arm case series, studies with insufficient data, and duplicates were excluded. We included all English-language studies from the different academic databases up till early December 2022. The primary outcome measures were set for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis included 15 studies that fulfilled the selection criteria comprising 11413 patients with surgically-resectable ICCA, of whom 6424 (56.3%) underwent hepatectomy with LND while the remainder underwent hepatectomy only. In patients who underwent LND, on average, 27.7% of the resected lymph nodes were positive for metastatic disease. Overall, the results showed that performing LND did not significantly improve OS or DFS. However, the effect of LND on OS showed a degree of variability by geographical region, in Eastern and Western countries. As LND is increasingly being performed, further time-based analysis was undertaken to identify time-dependent changes in the role of LND. An increasing adoption of LND was not associated with improved OS. Furthermore, no roles were identified for neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy or increasing lymph node retrieval in improving OS either.

CONCLUSION

LND might aid in staging, prognosticating, and deciding further management of resected ICCA, but does not improve OS and DFS and is unsuitable for high-risk patients unlikely to benefit from further treatments.

Is Lymphadenectomy Reasonable for Elderly Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients?

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of lymphadenectomy (LND) on clinical outcomes in ICC patients aged ≥ 70 years.

METHODS

Four hundred and three eligible patients diagnosed with ICC who underwent hepatectomy between 2004 and 2019 were enrolled in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The impact of LND on perioperative mortality and overall survival (OS) as well as the optimal total number of lymph nodes examined (TNLE) was estimated.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-nine pairs of patients were matched by propensity score matching. Perioperative mortality was comparable between the LND and non-LND (nLND) groups (0.7% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.367). The median OS in the LND group was significantly longer (44 vs. 32 months, P = 0.045) and LND was identified as an independent protective factor for OS by multivariate analysis (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92, P = 0.014). Patients with the following characteristics were potential beneficiaries of LND: white, female, no/moderate fibrosis, tumor size > 5 cm, solitary tumor, and localized invasion (all P < 0.05). TNLE ≥ 6 had the greatest discriminatory power for identifying lymph node metastasis (area under the curve, 0.704, Youden index, 0.365, P = 0.002). Patients with pathologically confirmed lymph node metastasis are likely to benefit from adjuvant therapy (40 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Advanced age (≥ 70 years) was not a contraindication for LND, which facilitates accurate nodal staging and guides postoperative management. Appropriately selected elderly populations could benefit from LND.

Fucosyltransferase 5 Promotes the Proliferative and Migratory Properties of Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Cells via Regulating Protein Glycosylation Profiles

Background

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is increasing globally, and its prognosis has not improved substantially in recent years. Understanding the pathogenesis of ICC may provide a theoretical basis for its treatment. In this study, we investigated the effects and underlying mechanisms of fucosyltransferase 5 (FUT5) on the malignant progression of ICC.

Methods

FUT5 expression in ICC samples and adjacent nontumor tissues was compared using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemical assays. We performed cell counting kit-8, colony formation, and migration assays to determine whether FUT5 influenced the proliferation and mobility of ICC cells. Finally, mass spectrometry was performed to identify the glycoproteins regulated by FUT5.

Results

FUT5 mRNA was significantly upregulated in most ICC samples compared with corresponding adjacent nontumor tissues. The ectopic expression of FUT5 promoted the proliferation and migration of ICC cells, whereas FUT5 knockdown significantly suppressed these cellular properties. Mechanistically, we demonstrated that FUT5 is essential for the synthesis and glycosylation of several proteins, including versican, β3 integrin, and cystatin 7, which may serve key roles in the precancer effects of FUT5.

Conclusions

FUT5 is upregulated in ICC and promotes ICC development by promoting glycosylation of several proteins. Therefore, FUT5 may serve as a therapeutic target for the treatment of ICC.

Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a multicenter propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unclear. This multicenter study examined the outcomes of laparoscopic liver resection for ICC.

METHODS

Patients with ICC who had undergone laparoscopic or open liver resection between 2012 and 2019 at four European expert centers were included in the study. Laparoscopic and open approaches were compared in terms of surgical and oncological outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for minimizing treatment selection bias and adjusting for confounders (age, ASA grade, tumor size, location, number of tumors and underlying liver disease).

RESULTS

Of 136 patients, 50 (36.7%) underwent laparoscopic resection, whereas 86 (63.3%) had open surgery. Median tumor size was larger (73.6 vs 55.1 mm, p = 0.01) and the incidence of bi-lobar tumors was higher (36.6 vs 6%, p < 0.01) in patients undergoing open surgery. After propensity score matching baseline characteristics were comparable although open surgery was associated with a larger fraction of major liver resections (74 vs 38%, p < 0.01), lymphadenectomy (60 vs 20%, p < 0.01) and longer operative time (294 vs 209 min, p < 0.01). Tumor characteristics were similar. Laparoscopic resection resulted in less complications (30 vs 52%, p = 0.025), fewer reoperations (4 vs 16%, p = 0.046) and shorter hospital stay (5 vs 8 days, p < 0.01). No differences were found in terms of recurrence, recurrence-free and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic resection seems to be associated with improved short-term and with similar long-term outcomes compared with open surgery in patients with ICC. However, possible selection criteria for laparoscopic surgery are yet to be defined.

Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma: a propensity score matching analysis

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has now been established as a safe and minimally invasive technique that is deemed feasible for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, the role of LLR in treating combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CC) patients has been rarely reported. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of LLR when compared with open liver resection (OLR) procedure for patients with cHCC-CC.

METHODS

A total of 229 cHCC-CC patients who underwent hepatic resection (34 LLR and 195 OLR patients) from January 2014 to December 2018 in Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University were enrolled and underwent a 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis between the LLR and OLR groups to compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) parameters were assessed by the log-rank test and the sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 34 LLR and 68 OLR patients were included after PSM analysis. The LLR group displayed a shorter postoperative hospital stay (6.61 vs. 8.26 days; p value < 0.001) when compared with the OLR group. No significant differences were observed in the postoperative complications' incidence or a negative surgical margin rate between the two groups (p value = 0.409 and p value = 1.000, respectively). The aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and inflammatory indicators in the LLR group were significantly lower than those in the OLR group on the first and third postoperative days. Additionally, OS and RFS were comparable in both the LLR and OLR groups (p value = 0.700 and p value = 0.780, respectively), and similar results were obtained by conducting a sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSION

LLR can impart less liver function damage, better inflammatory response attenuation contributing to a faster recovery, and parallel oncologic outcomes when compared with OLR. Therefore, LLR can be recommended as a safe and effective therapeutic modality for treating selected cHCC-CC patients, especially for those with small tumors in favorable location.

Albumin-Bilirubin Grade and Tumor Burden Score Predict Outcomes Among Patients with Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Hepatic Resection: a Multi-Institutional Analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic role of tumor burden score (TBS) relative to albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade among patients undergoing curative-intent resection of ICC has not been examined.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent curative-intent resection for ICC between 1990 and 2017 from a multi-institutional database. Multivariable analysis was performed to assess the effect of TBS relative to ALBI grade on both short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 724 patients, 360 (49.7%) patients had low TBS and low ALBI grade, 142 (19.6%) patients had low TBS and high ALBI grade, 138 (19.1%) patients had high TBS and low ALBI grade, and 84 patients (11.6%) had high TBS and high ALBI grade. Decreased tumor burden was associated with better long-term outcomes among patients with both low (5-year OS; low TBS vs. high TBS: 52.4% vs 21.4%; p < 0.001) and high ALBI grade (5-year OS; low TBS vs. high TBS: 40.7% vs 12.0%; p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, higher ALBI grade was associated with greater odds of an extended hospital LOS (> 10 days) (OR 2.80, 95%CI 1.62-4.82; p < 0.001), perioperative transfusion (OR 2.04, 95%CI 1.25-3.36; p = 0.005), 90-day mortality (OR 2.56, 95%CI 1.12-5.81; p = 0.025), as well as a major complication (OR 1.99, 95%CI 1.13-3.49; p = 0.016) among patients with similar tumor burden. Of note, patients with high TBS and high ALBI grade had markedly worse overall survival compared with patients who had low TBS and low ALBI grade disease (HR 2.27; 95%CI 1.44-3.59; p < 0.001). Importantly, high TBS and high ALBI grade were strongly associated with both early recurrence (88.1%%) and 5-year risk of death (96.4%).

CONCLUSION

Both TBS (i.e., tumor morphology) and ALBI grade (i.e., hepatic function reserve) were strong predictors of outcomes among patients undergoing ICC resection. There was an interplay between TBS and ALBI grade relative to patient prognosis after hepatic resection of ICC with high ALBI grade predicting worse outcomes among ICC patients with different TBS.

Adequate lymph node dissection is essential for accurate nodal staging in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A population-based study

PURPOSE

To comprehensively investigate the implications of lymph node dissection (LND) and the prognostic impact of the number of lymph node (LN) metastases on survival in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) using a large-scale study.

METHODS

Patients who underwent surgical resection for ICC between 2004 and 2018 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registries. The Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) between different groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) and subgroup analyses were performed to balance potential confounding factors. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to identify prognostic factors of survival outcomes. Restricted cubic splines fitted in the Cox proportional hazard regression models were also conducted to examine associations between continuous variables and outcomes.

RESULTS

In all, 1028 patients were enrolled. There were 652 (63.4%) patients undergoing LND, with lymph node metastasis (LNM) confirmed in 212 (32.5%) cases. Patients receiving LND did not show better survival outcomes than those receiving non-LND (NLND). We divided the LND group into two subgroups: patients with LNM (+) and those without LNM (-). Among these three groups, patients with LNM experienced the worst CSS and OS, while NLND patients had similar survival times to LNM (-) patients. Restricted cubic spline analysis indicated that an increased number of LNM was associated with a decreased chance of survival (p < 0.001). Patients who received LND were further categorized as having no nodal metastasis (N0), 1-2 LNM (N1), or ≥3 LNM (N2) according to the number of LNM. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the mortality risk of patients with N0, N1, and N2 disease (median CSS, N0 50.0 vs. N1 22.0 vs. N2 14.0 months; median OS, N0 46.0 vs. N1 21.0 vs. N2 14.0 months, all p < 0.01) increased significantly, except for patients who had <6 LNs harvested. On multivariable survival analysis, a higher nodal stage (N1 vs. N0: CSS, hazard ratio [HR] 2.135, 95% CI 1.636-2.788, p < 0.001; OS, HR 2.100, 95% CI 1.624-2.717, p < 0.001; N2 vs. N0: CSS, HR 4.027, 95% CI 2.791-5.811, p < 0.001; OS, HR 3.678, 95% CI 2.561-5.282, p < 0.001) was an independent prognostic risk factor for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the lack of a clear survival benefit of LND in patients with ICC, a significant positive association between the number of LNM and poor outcomes was observed. We still suggest adequate LND by examining at least six LNs to ensure precise staging. On this basis, the recently proposed nodal classification of N0, N1, and N2 stages may also allow better prognostic stratification of ICC patients.

Optimization of a laparoscopic procedure for advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on the concept of "waiting time": a preliminary report

INTRODUCTION

Clinicians increasingly perform laparoscopic surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). However, this surgery can be difficult in patients with advanced-stage ICC because of the complicated procedures and difficulty in achieving high-quality results. We compared the effects of a three-step optimized procedure with a traditional procedure for patients with advanced-stage ICC.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with advanced-stage ICC who received optimized laparoscopic hemihepatectomy with lymph node dissection (LND, optimized group) and 84 propensity score-matched patients who received traditional laparoscopic hemihepatectomy plus LND (traditional group) were analyzed. Surgical quality, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared.

RESULTS

The optimized group had a lower surgical bleeding score (P = 0.038) and a higher surgeon satisfaction score (P = 0.001). Blood loss during hepatectomy was less in the optimized group (190 vs. 295 mL, P < 0.001). The optimized group had more harvested LNs (12.0 vs. 8.0, P < 0.001) and more positive LNs (8.0 vs. 5.0, P < 0.001), and a similar rate of adequate LND (88.1% vs. 77.4%, P = 0.149). The optimized group had longer median DFS (9.0 vs. 7.0 months, P = 0.018) and median OS (15.0 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.046). In addition, the optimized group also had a shorter total operation time (P = 0.001), shorter liver resection time (P = 0.001), shorter LND time (P < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (P < 0.001), and lower incidence of total morbidities (14.3% vs. 36.9%, P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Our optimization of a three-step laparoscopic procedure for advanced ICC was feasible, improved the quality of liver resection and LND, prolonged survival, and led to better intraoperative and postoperative outcomes.

Clockwise Anterior-to-Posterior-Double Isolation (CAP-DI) Approach for Portal Lymphadenectomy in Biliary Tract Cancer: Technique, Yield, and Outcomes

Background: Portal lymphadenectomy (PLND) is the current standard for oncologic resection of biliary tract cancers (BTCs). However, published data show it is performed infrequently and often yields less than the recommended 6 lymph nodes. We sought to identify yield and outcomes using a Clockwise Anterior-to-Posterior technique with Double Isolation of critical structures (CAP-DI) for PLND. Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing complete PLND for BTCs using CAP-DI technique were identified (2015−2021). Lymph node (LN) yield and predictors of LN count were examined. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, which were compared to patients having hepatectomy without PLND. Results: In total, 534 patients were included; 71 with complete PLND (36 gallbladder cancers, 24 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 11 perihilar cholangiocarcinomas) and 463 in the control group. The median PLND yield was 5 (IQR 3−8; range 0−17) and 46% had at least 6 nodes retrieved. Older age was associated with lower likelihood of ≥6 node PLND yield (p = 0.032), which remained significant in bivariate analyses with other covariates (p < 0.05). After adjustment for operative factors, performance of complete PLND was independently associated with longer operative time (+46.4 min, p = 0.001), but no differences were observed in intraoperative or postoperative outcomes compared to the control group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Yield following PLND frequently falls below the recommended minimum threshold of 6 nodes despite a standardized stepwise approach to complete clearance. Older age may be weakly associated with lower PLND yield. While all efforts should be made for complete node retrieval, failure to obtain 6 nodes may be an unrealistic metric of surgical quality.

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy in T1N0M0 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after radical resection

OBJECTIVE

Adjuvant chemotherapy is necessary for radical resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with a high risk of recurrence (T2-4, N1). However, its use in the treatment of early-stage ICC remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the role of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection in patients with early-stage ICC (T1N0M0).

DATA AND METHODS

The data of 148 patients with pathologically diagnosed ICC (T1N0M0) who underwent radical resection from January 2012 to January 2018 at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively analyzed. Using consistent baseline data, Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed to compare relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients who received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC group) and those who received only surgical treatment (non-AC group). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to screen for independent prognostic factors affecting survival. The RFS and OS of patients were analyzed after the administration of three adjuvant chemotherapy regimens (gemcitabine + capecitabine [GX], gemcitabine + cisplatin [GP], and capecitabine monotherapy [X]). Finally, the safety of adjuvant chemotherapy was evaluated based on the incidence of grade 1-4 adverse events.

RESULTS

The median RFS was 18 months in the non-AC group and 25 months in the AC group. The median OS was 34 months in the non-AC group; however, it was not reached in the AC group. The OS of the AC group was significantly higher than that of the non-AC group (P = 0.005). Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that nerve invasion (P = 0.001), preoperative elevation of cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) levels (P = 0.009), and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.009) were independent prognostic factors for early-stage ICC after radical resection. The OS rates of the GX, GP, X, and non-AC groups were significantly different (P = 0.023) and were higher in the GX group than in the non-AC group (P = 0.0052). Among patients with elevated preoperative CA 19-9 levels, the OS rate was higher in the AC group than in the non-AC group (P = 0.022). In terms of safety, the incidence of grade 3 or 4 adverse reactions was < 18.2% in the GX, GP, and X groups, without the occurrence of death owing to such reactions.

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant chemotherapy can prolong OS among patients with early-stage ICC who have undergone radical resection. Preoperative elevation of CA 19-9 levels and nerve invasion are independent prognostic factors for poor survival outcomes for early-stage ICC after radical resection. All chemotherapy regimens used in the study are safe.

Comparison of current guidelines and consensus on the management of patients with cholangiocarcinoma: 2022 update

As a consequence of breakthroughs in the area of guidelines research, the therapy for cholangiocarcinoma has significantly improved the efficacy rate of diagnosis and survival outcomes. We compared the most recently updated clinical practice guidelines and consensus to provide recommendations based on the diagnostic and therapeutic equipment available in various countries. Following a systematic review, we discovered that these guidelines and consensus had both similarities and differences in terms of what organizations or groups drafted the guidelines and the approach, applicability, content and recent updates of the guidelines as well as in terms of diagnostic and treatment algorithms. The disparities could be attributable to a variety of etiological factors, high risk patients, health resources, medical technology, treatment options, and income levels. Additionally, while complete adoption of guidelines may benefit physicians, patients, and authorities, there remains a disconnect between expected goals and implementation.

Laparoscopic vs. open anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a highly malignant and invasive cancer originating from biliary epithelial cells. The current study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and clinical outcomes of laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

Methods

After screening, 95 patients who underwent anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma at our center were enrolled and divided into two groups according to the surgical approach; the baseline characteristics, pathological findings, surgical outcomes, and long-term outcomes were compared. Moreover, univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics or pathological findings between the two groups. Regarding short-term outcomes, the intraoperative blood loss, incision length, and length of postoperative hospital stay were more favorable in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy group than the open anatomical hepatectomy group (P < 0.05). The two groups differed significantly in the extent of liver resection, with a lower lymph node dissection rate and lymph node yield in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the postoperative complication rate was similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). The median postoperative follow-up times were 10.7 and 13.8 months in the laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy and open anatomical hepatectomy groups, respectively. Regarding the long-term follow-up results, OS and DFS were similar in the two groups (P > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors for OS were CA-199, CEA, HGB, tumor diameter, and T stage, and those for DFS were CA-199 (P < 0.05), and T stage (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is safe and feasible when performed by experienced surgeons. Compared with open anatomical hepatectomy, laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy provides better short-term outcomes and a comparable long-term prognosis.

Effect of lymph node resection on prognosis of resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of lymph node dissection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

Methods

The literature from January 2009 to December 2021 was searched to determine the comparative study of lymph node dissection and non-lymph node dissection in patients with ICC.

Results

Seventeen studies were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences in 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OR = 0.80, p = 0.10; OR = 0.93, p = 0.71; OR = 0.80, p = 0.21) and 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival (OR = 0.89, p = 0.73; OR = 0.92, p = 0.81; OR = 0.85, p = 0.62).

Conclusions

Lymph node dissection does not seem to have a positive effect on the overall survival and disease-free survival.

The Application Value of MRI T 2 ∗ WI Radiomics Nomogram in Discriminating Hepatocellular Carcinoma from Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Objective. To establish and validate an MRI T $2^{\ast }$ WI-based radiomics nomogram model and to discriminate hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA). Methods. 174 patients were retrospectively collected, who were diagnosed with primary hepatic carcinoma by surgery or puncture pathology and received preoperative MRI scans including T $2^{\ast }$ WI scans. There were 113 cases of HCC and 61 cases of mass-type ICCA. T $2^{\ast }$ WI was used for feature extraction, the extent of the lesions was manually outlined at the largest lesions layer of the T $2^{\ast }$ WI, and the feature dimension reduction was performed by the mRMR and LASSO to obtain the optimal feature set. The radiomics features and clinical risk factors were combined to establish the radiomics nomogram model. In both training and validation groups, calibration curves and ROC curves were applied to validate the efficacy of the established model. Finally, calibration curves were applied to assess the degree of fitting and DCA to assess the clinical utility of the established model. Results. The radiomics model had the AUC of 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85–0.96) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.83–0.99) in the training and validation groups, respectively; the AUC of the radiomics nomogram was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.94–0.99) in the training group and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.95–0.99) in the validation group. DCA suggested the clinical application value of the nomogram model. Conclusion. Radiomics nomogram model based on MRI T $2^{\ast }$ WI scan without enhancement can be used to discriminate HCC from ICCA.

Textbook oncologic outcomes and regionalization among patients undergoing hepatic resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Textbook oncologic outcome (TOO) and its association with regionalization of care for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) have not been evaluated.

METHODS

We identified patients who underwent hepatic resection for ICC between 2004 and 2018 from the National Cancer Database. Facilities were categorized by annual hepatectomy volume for ICC. TOO was defined as no 90-day mortality, margin-negative resection, no prolonged hospitalization, no 30-day readmission, receipt of appropriate adjuvant therapy, and adequate lymphadenectomy. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate the association between annual hepatectomy volume and TOO.

RESULTS

A total of 5359 patients underwent liver resection for ICC. TOO was achieved in 11.2% (n = 599) of patients. Inadequate lymphadenectomy was the largest impediment to achieving TOO. After adjusting for patient, pathologic, and facility characteristics, high volume facilities had 67% increased odds of achieving TOO (Ref.: low volume; high volume: odds ratio 1.67, 95% confidence interval: 1.24-2.25; p < 0.001). Patients treated at high-volume centers who achieved a TOO had better overall survival (OS) versus patients treated at low-volume facilities (low volume vs. high volume; median OS, 47.3 vs. 71.1 months, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A composite oncologic measure, TOO, provides a comprehensive insight into the performance of liver resection and regionalization of surgical care for ICC.

Radiomics-Based Preoperative Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Using Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is significantly associated with worse prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Improvement in preoperative assessment on LN metastasis helps in treatment decision-making. We aimed to investigate the role of radiomics-based method in predicting LN metastasis for patients with ICC.

METHODS

A total of 296 patients with ICC who underwent curative-intent hepatectomy and lymphadenectomy at two centers in China were analyzed. Radiomic features, including histogram- and wavelet-based features, shape and size features, and texture features were extracted from four-phase computerized tomography (CT) images. The clinical and conventional radiological variables which were independently associated with LN metastasis were also identified. A combined nomogram predicting LN metastasis was developed, and its performance was determined by discrimination, calibration, and stratification of long-term prognosis. The results were validated by the internal and external validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Twenty-four radiomic features were selected into the nomogram. The established nomogram demonstrated good discrimination and calibration, with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.98 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.96-0.99], 0.93 (0.88-0.98), and 0.89 (0.81-0.96) in the training and two validation cohorts, respectively. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of patients with high risk of LN metastasis as grouped by nomogram were poorer than those of patients with low risk in the training cohort (OS 28.8% versus 53.9%, p < 0.001; RFS 26.3% versus 44.2%, p = 0.001). Similar results were observed in the two validation cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiomics-based method provided accurate prediction of LN metastasis and prognostic assessment for ICC patients, and might aid the preoperative surgical decision.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Therapy in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is the second most common primary liver cancer and causes major economic and health burdens throughout the world. Although the incidence of ICC is relatively low, an upward trend has been seen over the past few decades. Owing to the lack of specific manifestations and tools for early diagnosis, most ICC patients have relatively advanced disease at diagnosis. Thus, neoadjuvant therapy is necessary to evaluate tumor biology and downstage these patients so that appropriate candidates can be selected for radical liver resection. However, even after radical resection, the recurrence rate is relatively high and is a main cause leading to death after surgery, which makes adjuvant therapy necessary. Because of its low incidence, studies in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings of ICC are lagging compared with other types of malignancy. While standard neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens are not available in the current guidelines due to a lack of high-level evidence, some progress has been achieved in recent years. In this review, the available literature on advances in neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies in ICC are evaluated, and possible challenges and opportunities for clinical and translational investigations in the near future are discussed.

Clinical application of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging in laparoscopic lymph node dissection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A pilot study (with video)

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is a highly lethal malignancy characterized by lymph node metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of indocyanine green fluorescence for visualization of lymphatic drainage and to assess its clinical application during laparoscopic lymph node dissection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

All patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic left hepatectomy and lymph node dissection between October 2018 and January 2021 were reviewed. The patients were assigned to the indocyanine green group or non-intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group based on the staining technique used.

RESULTS

Of 38 patients with left hemiliver intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, 20 underwent intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tracer-guided laparoscopic radical left hepatectomy; 12 procedures were successful (indocyanine green group). During the same period, 18 patients were treated with traditional laparoscopic resection (control group). Their intraoperative factors were comparable and there were no differences in the incidence or severity of their postoperative complications 30 days after surgery (P > .05). In the indocyanine green group, more lymph nodes were harvested (mean [range]: 7.0 [6.0-8.0] vs 3.5 [3.0-5.0], P < .001) and the proportion of confirmed pathologic lymph nodes was higher (75.0%, 66.7%-87.5% vs 40%, 33.3%-50.0%, P < .001). ICG staining was observed in all (12/12, 100%) patients in the intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma group at stations 8 and 12, and 9 (9/12, 75%) and 10 (11/12, 91.7%) patients at Stations 13 and 7, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The indocyanine green fluorescence imaging system is feasible, safe, and effective for tracing lymph nodes. It can be used to identify regional lymphatic drainage patterns and help define the scope of lymph node dissection in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

The effect of trans arterial chemoembolization in the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A comprehensive re-evaluation on the role of trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

A thorough database searching was performed in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Eligible studies were restricted to comparative studies between TACE and non-TACE cohorts. RevMan5.3 software and Stata 13.0 software were used for statistical analyses. The primary endpoint of our study was long-term survival.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies with 2036 patients were finally identified. Pooled results revealed that patients receiving TACE had a significantly better overall survival (OS) versus those without TACE (P < 0.05). Subgroup analyses were performed according to different types of TACE. Prophylactic post-surgical TACE (PPTACE) was associated with a significantly better OS versus those without PPTACE (P < 0.05). Palliative TACE (PTACE) also achieved a significantly better OS compared with those with supportive treatment (ST) only (P < 0.00001). However, TACE had no impact on disease-free survival (P = 0.87) and was less effective than surgical resection (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

PPTACE has a remarkable impact on OS versus those with surgical resections only and should be regularly performed. Regarding patients with unresectable disease, apart from conventional ST, adjuvant PTACE is also recommended. Upcoming prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted for further validation.

Incidence Trend and Competing Risk Analysis of Patients With Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Population-Based Study

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICCA) is a primary liver cancer characterized by rapid progression and poor prognosis. There are few effective tools for evaluating the prognosis of ICCA patients, and the use of liver transplantation (LT) of the treatment for ICCA is still controversial.

Methods

We analyzed ICCA incidence data and clinicopathological data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Prognostic predictors were identified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses and then used to establish a nomogram. The prediction performance of the nomogram was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots and decision curve analysis (DCA) plots. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the baseline data of patients undergoing LT and other operations, and then, univariate Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate the therapeutic value of LT for ICCA.

Results

The incidence of ICCA increased significantly, from 0.6 per 100,000 in 2,000 to 1.3 per 100,000 in 2018. The median overall survival (OS) of the patients was 13 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 51.40, 22.14, and 13.79%, respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that age under 60 years old, female, tumor size ≤ 50 mm, better differentiation, smaller range of tumor invasion, lack of distant metastasis, regional lymph node surgery and treatment were associated with a better prognosis. The ROC curves, calibration plots, and DCA plots showed that the nomogram had good discrimination and calibration power, as well as clinical utility. After PSM, the univariate Cox regression analysis showed no significant difference in OS between patients treated with LT and patients treated with other operations.

Conclusion

The incidence of ICCA increased significantly. A nomogram with good predictive performance was developed to predict the OS of ICCA patients. LT might be considered as a potential option for some ICCA patients.

Multiparametric MRI-Based Radiomic Signature for Preoperative Evaluation of Overall Survival in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma After Partial Hepatectomy

BACKGROUND

The clinical outcomes of patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) after partial hepatectomy remain suboptimal. Identifying patients with poor outcomes before surgery is urgently required.

PURPOSE

To develop a multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic signature to evaluate overall survival (OS) preoperatively and to investigate its incremental value for disease stratification.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

One hundred and sixty-three patients with pathologically defined ICC, divided into training (N = 115) and validation sets (N = 48).

SEQUENCE

Three-dimensional T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence with and without contrast agent, T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence, and diffusion-weighted imaging with single-shot echo-planar sequence at 1.5 T or 3.0 T.

ASSESSMENT

OS was defined as the time from the date of surgery to death or last contact. The radiomic signature was built based on the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model. A clinicopathologic-radiographic (CPR) model and a combined model integrating radiomic signature with CPR factors were developed with multivariable Cox regression models.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was used to compare the discrimination of different models. Net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to quantify the improvement of prognostic accuracy after adding radiomic signature.

RESULTS

The high-risk patients of death defined by the radiomic signature showed significantly lower OS compared with low-risk patients in validation set (3-year OS 17.1% vs. 56.4%, P < 0.001). Integrating radiomic signature into tumor, node, and metastasis (TNM) staging system significantly improved the prognostic accuracy compared with TNM stage alone (validation set C-index 0.745 vs. 0.649, P = 0.039, NRI improvement 39.9%-43.8%, IDI improvement 16.1%-19.4%). The radiomic signature showed no significant difference of C-index with postoperative CPR model (validation set, 0.698 vs. 0.674, P = 0.752). Incorporating the radiomic signature into CPR model significantly improved prognostic accuracy (NRI improvement 32.5%-34.3%, IDI improvement 8.1%-12.9%).

DATA CONCLUSION

Multiparametric MRI-based radiomic signature is a potential biomarker for preoperative prognostic evaluation of ICC patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.

Extent of Lymph Node Dissection for Accurate Staging in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Although lymph node metastasis is a known factor predictive of a poor prognosis after radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), few studies have investigated lymph node dissection (LND) areas for accurate staging. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal LND level for ICC considering lymphatic flow.

METHODS

Clinical characteristics and pathologic nodal status (presence of metastasis) for 163 patients were reviewed according to tumor location. In the node-positive (N1) group, the distribution of metastatic nodes was described. The coverage of metastatic nodes according to dissection level was assessed, and the minimum dissection level for accurate ICC staging was estimated accordingly. For validation, the node-negative (N0) group was divided into two subgroups according to the estimated dissection level, and survival outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

In the N1 group, expanding dissection to stations no. 12 and 8 covered 82.0% (n = 50) of metastatic cases regardless of tumor location. In survival analysis of N0 group, patients who underwent LND covering stations no. 8+12 showed better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), although the differences were not statistically significant (DFS: covering no. 12+8 vs. not covering no. 12+8, 109.0 months [24.2-193.8] vs. 33.0 months [10.3-55.7], p = 0.078; OS: covering no. 12+8 vs. not covering no. 12+8, 180.0 months [21.6-338.4] vs. 73.0 months [42.8-103.2], p = 0.080).

CONCLUSION

LND including at least stations no. 12 (hepatoduodenal ligament) and 8 (common hepatic artery), regardless of tumor location, is recommended for accurate staging in ICC patients.

Evaluation of nodal status in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study

Background

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a well-established prognostic factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but there are still some controversies relating to the evaluation of nodal status. Therefore, we investigated the role of lymph node dissection (LND), compared the prognostic performances of different nodal staging systems, and then developed and validated a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) of ICC patients.

Methods

The study cohort was taken from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, Harrell's C-index and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to evaluate the different staging models. The nomogram for the CSS was constructed based on Cox regression models and validated by calibration curves. Decision curve analysis was introduced to examine the clinical value of the models.

Results

A total of 664 patients were enrolled, and 331 (51.4%) patients underwent LND. An increasing number of lymph nodes retrieved showed no oncologic benefit (P=0.876). LNM was identified in 103 (31.1%) patients, which was the cause of their poor prognoses (5-yr CSS 13.1% versus 44.9%, P<0.001). Patients without LNM could not benefit from adjuvant therapy after propensity score matching (P=0.140). Based on the Youden index, 4 or more lymph nodes retrieved might be adequate for accurate staging. The lymph node ratio (LNR) classification, with an optimal cut-off value of 0.15, displayed the best prognostic performance. Age, size, tumor number, T Stage, grade and the LNR classification were independent predictive factors for the CSS in ICC patients. The nomogram for predicting the CSS of ICC patients according to the independent factors was well calibrated and it showed better discrimination power and higher net benefits than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th edition) staging system.

Conclusions

LNM is an independent prognostic factor in ICC. Although it shows no oncologic benefits, LND should still be considered as a method of stratifying patients, with 4 or more lymph nodes retrieved potentially enough to do so. LNR appears to be a promising and easy-to-use prognosticator for nodal staging. The constructed nomogram could serve as an effective tool to predict the CSS probabilities of ICC patients.

Impact of lymph node dissection on clinical outcomes of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: Inverse probability of treatment weighting with survival analysis

Background

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) has been established as a critical risk factor for prognosis in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). The clinical implications of lymph node dissection (LND) have been debated. This study aimed to clarify the prognostic impact of LND by multicenter retrospective analysis.

Methods

A total of 310 ICC patients who had undergone curative resection between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. The prognostic impact of LND was estimated under an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach using propensity scores.

Results

LND was performed for 224 patients (72%), with LNM pathologically confirmed in 90 patients (40%). Prognosis was poorer for patients with LNM (median survival, 16.9 months) than for those without (57.2 months; P < .0001). One‐, 3‐, and 5‐year overall survival rates (OS) were comparable among LND+ (81.6%, 48.0%, and 37.5%, respectively) and LND– groups (81.6%, 55.4%, and 44.6%, respectively). However, advanced tumor, as characterized by larger tumor, multinodular lesions, and serosal invasion, was significantly more frequent in the LND+ group than in the LND– group. After IPTW adjusting for imbalances, 1‐, 3‐, and 5‐year OS were better in the LND+ group (83.5%, 52.2%, and 42.8%, respectively) than in the LND– group (71.9%, 32.4%, and 23.4%, respectively; P = .046). LND thus showed significant prognostic impact (hazard ratio = 0.58, 95%CI = |0.39|–|0.84|, P = .005), especially in hilar ICC. However, peripheral ICC displayed no therapeutic benefit from LND.

Conclusions

LND could have a significant role to play in improving oncologic outcomes. Therapeutic LND should be implemented on the basis of tumor location and tumor advancement.

The role of lymphadenectomy in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A review

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary tumor of the liver. The incidence and mortality of its intrahepatic form has been increasing over the past 2 decades. Currently, the only available curative treatment for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is surgical resection. There is still no prospective evidence to support neoadjuvant systemic treatments in resectable disease, while adjuvant chemotherapy with Capecitabine is currently the only recommended systemic treatment after liver resection based on the results of randomised trial. Despite the implementation of perioperative treatments and improvements in resective surgery, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains a disease characterized by high incidence of recurrence and poor long-term survival. Lymph node metastases can be found in 45-65% of patients and are one of the most impacting prognostic factors after surgical resection. Preoperative imaging is not always sufficient in assessing lymph node status, thus hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy can be important to ensure precise staging in surgical patients. An increasing trend in performing lymph node dissection during liver resection for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma has been observed in the last 20 years, although its actual efficacy compared to the potential complications remains debated. The current evidence on the prognostic role of the lymph node status, its preoperative predictability, the basis for a correct hepatic pedicle lymphadenectomy and its prognostic role in the surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma are presented.

The clinical value of regional lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to explore the clinical value of lymph node dissection (LND) for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

Clinical and pathological data were collected from 147 ICC patients who attended two tertiary centers over the past 5 years. The patients were classified into two groups: the LND group (group A) and the no-performance LND (NLND) group (group B). Clinical and pathological parameters were compared between the two groups to analyze the impact of LND on the long-term survival time of ICC patients.

RESULTS

Of the 147 patients, 54.4% (80) received LND and 42.5% (34/80) of these were found to have lymph node metastasis (LNM). LND did not increase postoperative complications (27.5%, P = 0.354), but postoperative hospital stays were longer (12.2 ± 6.3 d, P = 0.005) in group A compared with group B (20.9%, 9.5 ± 3.5 d). The 5-year survival rates of groups A and B are almost similar (21% vs 29%, P = 0.905). The overall survival rate of cN0 (diagnosis obtained by imaging) is better than pN1 (diagnosis obtained by histopathology), but lower than pN0 (all P < 0.05). Compared with NLND, the median survival time of LND patients with T1 has not significantly improved (29.3 vs 35.1 months, P = 0.762), but the patients with T2-4 has been significantly increased (29.0 vs 17.1 months, P = 0.040). Elevated CA19-9 level (HR = 1.764, 95% CI: 1.113-2.795, P = 0.016), vascular invasion (HR = 2.697, 95% CI: 1.103-6.599, P = 0.030), and T category (HR = 1.848, 95% CI: 1.059-3.224, P = 0.031) were independent risk factors for poor long-term survival time of the ICC patients (all P values < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ICC patients with cN0 may have LNM, and the long-term survival time of LNM patients is usually poor. We suggest that patients with ICC may require routine LND, especially those with T2-4 category.

Current Surgical Management of Peri-Hilar and Intra-Hepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

Cholangiocarcinoma accounts for approximately 10% of all hepatobiliary tumors and represents 3% of all new-diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (i-CCA) accounts for 10% of all cases, perihilar (h-CCA) cholangiocarcinoma represents two-thirds of the cases, while distal cholangiocarcinoma accounts for the remaining quarter. Originally described by Klatskin in 1965, h-CCA represents one of the most challenging tumors for hepatobiliary surgeons, mainly because of the anatomical vascular relationships of the biliary confluence at the hepatic hilum. Surgery is the only curative option, with the goal of a radical, margin-negative (R0) tumor resection. Continuous efforts have been made by hepatobiliary surgeons in order to achieve R0 resections, leading to the progressive development of aggressive approaches that include extended hepatectomies, associating liver partition, and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, pre-operative portal vein embolization, and vascular resections. i-CCA is an aggressive biliary cancer that arises from the biliary epithelium proximal to the second-degree bile ducts. The incidence of i-CCA is dramatically increasing worldwide, and surgical resection is the only potentially curative therapy. An aggressive surgical approach, including extended liver resection and vascular reconstruction, and a greater application of systemic therapy and locoregional treatments could lead to an increase in the resection rate and the overall survival in selected i-CCA patients. Improvements achieved over the last two decades and the encouraging results recently reported have led to liver transplantation now being considered an appropriate indication for CCA patients.

Comparison of ICC patients with hepatitis B infection to those with no major risk factors for HCC

BACKGROUND

There has been renewed interest in HBV-associated ICC, because it could share a common carcinogenesis disease process with HCC. We investigated whether there is a difference in clinical outcome between ICC patients with HBV infection and those without any major risk factors for HCC.

METHODS

A total of 253 curatively resected, surgically diagnosed ICC patients were analyzed and divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of major risk factors for HCC: an HBV group (n = 45) and a non-HCC-risk (NHR) group (n = 208).

RESULTS

Lymph node metastasis was more frequently observed in the NHR group (HBV vs. NHR: 8.89% vs. 24.52%, P = 0.027). Patients in the HBV group demonstrated more favorable survival than those in the NHR group. However, this difference was not statistically significant (5-year survival rate, 54.7% vs. 42.3%, P = 0.128). Cumulative recurrence rate in the HBV group was 62.2%, which was not significantly different from 63.0% in the NHR group (P = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

This study found that while ICC patients with HBV infection showed some favorable tumor characteristics, patients' stage-specific survival and recurrence rates were not significantly different compared to those without any major risk factors for HCC.

Recommended Minimal Number of Harvested Lymph Nodes for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is one factor indicating a poor prognosis after radical surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). Although several guidelines have recommended that LN dissection be strongly considered at the time of ICC surgery, no clear evidence regarding the appropriate number of harvested LNs has been established. Thus, we aimed to identify the minimum number of harvested LNs required for ICC by using a Bayesian Weibull model.

METHODS

Data from 142 patients who underwent radical hepatectomy (R0) for ICC from January 2000 to December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. A Bayesian Weibull model was developed to analyze the effect of number of harvested LNs on survival of patients without (N0; n = 71) and with (N1; n = 71) metastatic nodes. We also compared the percentage of N1 patients (i.e., the N1 rate) in each of the five subgroups categorized according to the number of harvested LNs (1-4, 5-8, 9-12, 13-16, and ≥ 17).

RESULTS

In patients with 5 or more harvested LNs, the hazard ratio (HR) for LN metastasis was above the reference line (the HR with 5 harvested LNs, 1.95 (1.09-3.45)). The N1 rate of the 1-4 harvested LNs subgroup was lower than that of the other subgroups (e.g., 1-4 vs. 5-8; 16.1% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that at least 5 LNs should be harvested in patients who undergo radical surgery for ICC to promote accurate staging.

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Dissection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma Patients With Clinically Negative Lymph Node Metastasis: A Multi-Center Study From China

BACKGROUND

The clinical value of lymph-node dissection (LND) for intrahepatic carcinoma (ICC) patients with clinically negative lymph node metastasis (LNM) remains unclear; hence we conducted a multi-center study to explore it.

METHODS

Patients who were diagnosed ICC with clinically negative LNM and underwent hepatectomy with or without LND from December 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively collected from 12 hepatobiliary centers in China. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and then subgroup analysis was conducted stratified by variables related to the prognosis.

RESULTS

A total of 380 patients were eligible including 106 (27.9%) in the LND group and 274 (72.1%) in the non-LND group. Median OS in the LND group was slightly longer than that in the non-LND group (24.0 vs. 18.0 months, P = 0.30), but a significant difference was observed between the two groups (24.0 vs. 14.0 months, P = 0.02) after a well-designed 1:1 propensity score matching without increased severe complications. And, LND was identified to be one of the independent risk factors of OS (HR = 0.66, 95%CI = 0.46-0.95, P = 0.025). Subgroup analysis in the matched cohort showed that patients could benefit more from LND if they were male, age <60 years, had no HBV infection, with ECOG score <2, CEA ≤5 ug/L, blood loss ≤400 ml, transfusion, major hepatectomy, resection margin ≥1 cm, tumor size >5 cm, single tumor, mass-forming, no satellite, no MVI, and no perineural invasion (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, only patients with pathologically confirmed positive LNM were found to benefit from postoperative adjuvant therapy (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

With the current data, we concluded that LND would benefit the selected ICC patients with clinically negative LNM and might guide the postoperative management.

Prognostic significance of and risk prediction model for lymph node metastasis in resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: do all require lymph node dissection?

BACKGROUND

Lymph node (LN) metastasis portends a worse prognosis following resection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC); however, lymphadenectomy is not routinely performed, as its role remains controversial. Herein, we developed a risk model for LN metastasis by identifying its predictive factors and assessed a subset of patients who might not benefit from LN dissection (LND).

METHODS

210 patients who underwent curative-intent surgery for ICC were retrospectively reviewed. A preoperative risk model for LN metastasis was developed following identification of its preoperative predictive factors using the recursive partitioning method.

RESULTS

In the multivariable analysis, CA 19-9 level of >120 U/mL, an enlarged LN on computed tomography, and a tumor location abutting the Glissonean pedicles were independent predictors of LN metastasis. The preoperative risk model classified the patients according to their risk: high, intermediate, and low risks at a rate of LN metastasis on final pathology of 60.9%, 35%, and 2.3%, respectively. In the subgroup analysis among the low-risk patients, performance of LND had no survival advantage over non-performance of LND.

CONCLUSION

Routine LND for preoperatively diagnosed ICC should be recommended to patients at an intermediate and a high risk of developing LN metastasis but may be omitted for low-risk patients.

Mesencephalic Astrocyte-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, a Prognostic Factor of Cholangiocarcinoma, Affects Sorafenib Sensitivity of Cholangiocarcinoma Cells by Deteriorating ER Stress

Purpose

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is an aggressive malignant tumor characterized by high malignancy and poor prognosis. Although the efficacy of sorafenib against cholangiocarcinoma cell lines has been demonstrated in vivo and in vitro, limited clinical data are available on the efficacy of sorafenib in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. Sorafenib can enhance endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-mediated apoptosis, and ER stress and unfolded protein response are also the mechanisms by which cancer cells resist drug therapy. Mesencephalic astrocyte-derived neurotrophic factor (MANF), initially identified as a neurotrophic factor, can be regulated by ER stress activation. There are no available studies on the diagnostic value and therapeutic significance of MANF in ICC. Hence, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of MANF in cholangiocarcinoma, investigating the possibility of whether sorafenib could become a reliable strategy for cholangiocarcinoma therapy.

Methods

In this study, the expression level of MANF in ICC patients was investigated by bioinformatic analysis and the results were verified by tissue microarray assay. Cholangiocarcinoma cell lines were also used to determine how MANF regulates the therapeutic effect of sorafenib and to identify the underlying mechanisms.

Results

The results showed that MANF was correlated with poor prognosis and MANF knockdown could facilitate sorafenib-mediated apoptosis and increase the sensitivity of sorafenib treatment by activating excessive ER stress.

Conclusion

MANF is a prognostic marker of cholangiocarcinoma. MANF knockdown increases sorafenib-mediated ER stress and apoptosis in the cholangiocarcinoma cell lines. This mechanism may lead to a new therapeutic strategy in cholangiocarcinoma.

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic versus open liver resection (LLR vs. OLR) associated lymphadenectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) are still controversial. The aim of the present study was to compare short and long-term outcomes. We reviewed data on 43 consecutive patients who underwent curative liver resection with associated lymphadenectomy for ICC. The short-term outcomes including postoperative morbidity and mortality, and the long-term outcomes including overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. The median survival, 1- and 3-year OS in LLR and OLR groups were 22.5 months, 76.9% and 47.1%, and 12.1 months, 43.1% and 20.0%, respectively. The median survival, 1- and 3-year RFS in LLR and OLR groups were 10.3 months, 27.8% and 0%, and 8.1 months, 24.0% and 4.0%, respectively. The results showed that LLR obviously reduced intraoperative blood loss (median, 375 vs. 500ml, p = 0.016) and postoperative hospital stay (median, 6 vs. 9 days, p = 0.016). Moreover, there was no significant difference in short-term outcomes including postoperative morbidity (including wound infection, bile leakage, liver failure and pneumonia) and mortality within 30 days, and long-term outcomes including OS and RFS between LLR and OLR. (all p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that CA19-9 level, TNM stage, and tumor differentiation were independent risk factors for OS and RFS. LLR for ICC is safety and feasibility compared with OLR. The advantage of LLR was to reduce intraoperative blood loss and postoperative hospital stay.

Very Early Recurrence After Liver Resection for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Considering Alternative Treatment Approaches

IMPORTANCE

Although surgery offers the best chance of a potential cure for patients with localized, resectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), prognosis of patients remains dismal largely because of a high incidence of recurrence.

OBJECTIVE

To predict very early recurrence (VER) (ie, recurrence within 6 months after surgery) following resection for ICC in the pre- and postoperative setting.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for ICC between May 1990 and July 2016 were identified from an international multi-institutional database. The study was conducted at The Ohio State University in collaboration with all other participating institutions. The data were analyzed in December 2019.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Two logistic regression models were constructed to predict VER based on pre- and postoperative variables. The final models were used to develop an online calculator to predict VER and the tool was internally and externally validated.

RESULTS

Among 880 patients (median age, 59 years [interquartile range, 51-68 years]; 388 women [44.1%]; 428 [50.2%] white; 377 [44.3%] Asian; 27 [3.2%] black]), 196 (22.3%) developed VER. The 5-year overall survival among patients with and without VER was 8.9% vs 49.8%, respectively (P < .001). A preoperative model was able to stratify patients relative to the risk for VER: low risk (6-month recurrence-free survival [RFS], 87.7%), intermediate risk (6-month RFS, 72.3%), and high risk (6-month RFS, 49.5%) (log-rank P < .001). The postoperative model similarly identified discrete cohorts of patients based on probability for VER: low risk (6-month RFS, 90.0%), intermediate risk (6-month RFS, 73.1%), and high risk (6-month RFS, 48.5%) (log-rank, P < .001). The calibration and predictive accuracy of the pre- and postoperative models were good in the training (C index: preoperative, 0.710; postoperative, 0.722) as well as the internal (C index: preoperative, 0.715; postoperative, 0.728; bootstrapping resamples, n = 5000) and external (C index: postoperative, 0.672) validation data sets.

CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE

An easy-to-use online calculator was developed to help clinicians predict the chance of VER after curative-intent resection for ICC. The tool performed well on internal and external validation. This tool may help clinicians in the preoperative selection of patients for neoadjuvant therapy as well as during the postoperative period to inform surveillance strategies.

[Long-term results of surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term outcomes of surgical treatment of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma depending tumor dimensions, vascular invasion, lymph node metastases, cellular differentiation and quality of resection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 46 patients with intrahepatic cholangiocellular cancer. Extended hemihepatectomy was made in 14 patients (30.4%), resection of two and three liver segments - in 17 cases (36.9%), standard hemihepatectomy - in 15 patients (32.6%). Liver resection was combined with extrahepatic bile duct resection in 5 (10.9%) patients. Liver resection was followed by biopsy of specimens. Dimension and number of tumors, differentiation grade, resection margin, liver capsule invasion, vascular invasion and regional lymph node metastases were analyzed. Forty-four (95.6%) patients were followed-up in long-term postoperative period. Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 13.2 (Dell Inc., USA) and IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 (IBM Corp., USA) software package. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated using IBM SPSS Statistics v.25 software.

RESULTS

Median survival was 37 months, 1-year - 75.9% (60.9-90.9%), 3-year - 57.6% (35.5-79.6%), 5-year - 36% (8.2-63.7%). Median survival after R1 resection was 37 months, R2 resection - 12 months. Median survival was not achieved in R0 group. We found significant differences in overall survival depending on quality of resection. Tumor dimension over 5 cm, low-grade adenocarcinoma, microvascular invasion and lymph node metastases were associated with impaired postoperative survival. However, differences were not significant.

CONCLUSION

The main surgical strategy in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma should be ensuring microscopically negative resection margin.

Liver resection and transplantation for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

The incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing worldwide. Although several advances have been made in the past decades to better understand this complex malignancy and to develop new treatment strategies, the prognosis of iCCA remains dismal. Liver resection (LR) is the mainstay of treatment but only a minority of patients are amenable to surgery. In most cases, patients with iCCA will require a major hepatectomy for complete resection of the tumour. This may be contraindicated or increase the surgical burden in patients with chronic liver disease and small remnant liver volume. Lymphadenectomy with a minimal harvest of 6 lymph nodes is considered adequate, as microscopic nodal metastases have been shown in more than 40% of patients. Current 5-year overall survival following LR is in the range of 25%-40%. For locally advanced disease not amenable to upfront LR, neoadjuvant locoregional therapies may be used with the aim of converting these patients to resectability or even to transplantation in well-selected cases. Recent studies have shown that liver transplantation (LT) might be a treatment option for patients with unresectable very-early iCCA (i.e. ≤2 cm), with survival outcomes comparable to those of hepatocellular carcinoma. In patients with unresectable, advanced tumours, confined to the liver who achieve sustained response to neoadjuvant treatment, LT may be considered an option within prospective protocols. The role of adjuvant therapies in iCCA is still under debate. Herein, we review the recent advances in the surgical treatment of iCCA and examine its correlation with locoregional therapies, adjuvant and neo-adjuvant strategies.

Modifications of the AJCC 8th edition staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and proposal for a new staging system by incorporating serum tumor markers

BACKGROUND

Several studies have noted that the discriminatory ability and stratification performance of the AJCC 8th edition staging system is not entirely satisfactory. We aimed to improve the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).

METHODS

A multicentric database from three Chinese mainland centers (n = 1601 patients) was used to modify the 8th edition staging system. This modified TNM (mTNM) staging system was then validated using the SEER database (n = 761 patients). A new TNM staging system, by incorporating serum tumor markers (TNMIS) into the mTNM staging system was then proposed.

RESULTS

The 8th edition staging system did not provide an adequate stratification of prognosis in the Chinese multicentric cohort. The mTNM staging system offered a better discriminatory capacity in the multicentric cohort than the original 8th edition. External validation in the SEER cohort showed that the mTNM staging system also had a good stratification performance. After further incorporating a serum marker stage into the mTNM staging, the TNMIS staging system was able to stratify prognosis even better.

CONCLUSION

The proposed mTNM staging system resulted in better stratification performance and the TNMIS staging system provided even more accurate prognostic classification than the conventional TNM system.

Prognostic Factors and Treatment Strategies for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma from 2004 to 2013: Population-Based SEER Analysis

BACKGROUND: Seventy percent of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) patients are inoperable. Treatment for unresectable patients is essential to improve poor survival. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors for ICC patients, and investigate the potential treatment strategies for unresectable patients. METHODS: ICC patients were identified in SEER registry in 2004–2013. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to evaluate the effect of treatment strategies. RESULTS: Of 2248 cases diagnosed in 2010–2013 and staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th edition, 1706 (76.13%) did not receive cancer-directed surgery. This portion increased compared to those diagnosed between 2004 and 2009 and staged according to the AJCC 6th edition (72.87%). In addition, the percentage of stage 4 cases increased, while stage 3 cases decreased, because AJCC 7th staging system categorized both T4 and N1 patients into stage IV, which were previously categorized into stage III by AJCC 6th staging system. Patients with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) showed a poorer survival in 2004–2009 (P = .0213), but an almost the same survival as patients with tumor resection in 2010–2013 (P = .51), suggesting that RFA performed better in recent years. Lymphadenectomy showed protective effect for unresectable patients. Radiotherapy improved cancer-specific survival in non-surgery patients (P < .0001).The proportion of stage IV patients increased tremendously from 37.4% in 2004–2009 to 58.7% in 2010–2013. Among 1319 stage IV patients (2010–2013), surgery at distant metastatic sites improved cancer-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: For unresectable tumors, RFA, radiotherapy, lymphadenectomy, and surgery of distant metastases showed significant benefits to improve cancer-specific survival.

Prognostic value of lymphadenectomy for long-term outcomes in node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Lymphadenectomy ensures accurate staging for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, especially for those without preoperatively suspected positive lymph nodes (clinically node-negative); however, its prognostic value has been poorly documented. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy on long-term outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

METHODS

Data from all patients who underwent liver resection with or without lymphadenectomy for preoperatively diagnosed intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma between 2000 and 2016 at 3 tertiary hepatobiliary centers were analyzed retrospectively. Propensity score matching in a 1:1 ratio was conducted based on clinically relevant covariates between patients with clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma who underwent liver resection with (LND group) and without (NLND group) lymphadenectomy. Overall survival and disease-free survival were compared in the matched cohort.

RESULTS

Among 350 patients who underwent surgery during the study period, 192 (55%) with clinically node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 2 well-balanced groups of 56 patients each were analyzed. There was no significant difference regarding postoperative variables among these 112 matched patients. Patients who underwent a liver resection with lymphadenectomy achieved better 3- and 5-year overall survival (78% and 65% vs 52% and 46%, P = .017) and disease-free survival (46% and 34% vs 31% and 31%; P = .042) compared with patients who underwent liver resection without lymphadenectomy.

CONCLUSION

Lymphadenectomy can be associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Our data may support routine lymphadenectomy for node-negative intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with the objective of achieving better long-term outcomes.