The prognostic value of the number of metastatic lymph nodes on the long-term survival of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma using the SEER database

Background

In the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer, the nodal staging of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is classified as N0 and N1 in accordance with lymph node (LN) metastases. Recently, several studies have reported that the number of metastatic LNs is associated with prognosis in patients with ICC. However, the majority of these studies were published in Eastern countries, and there are few available data for Western countries. This study aimed to investigate the association between metastatic LN number and prognosis in ICC patients using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

Data from 658 ICC patients in the SEER database who underwent hepatectomy with LN dissection from 2000 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Hazard ratios (HRs) according to increasing numbers of metastatic LN were calculated. The patients were then divided into three groups according to their metastatic LN numbers (N0: no metastatic LNs; N+ <4: 1-3 metastatic LNs; N+ ≥4: ≥4 metastatic LNs), and cause-specific survival (CSS) was compared.

Results

Metastatic LN number was a prognostic factor of oncologic survival [CSS: HR =1.300; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.225-1.379; P<0.001]. In survival analysis, an increasing number of metastatic LNs was significantly correlated with poorer oncologic outcomes [CSS: N0 vs. N+ <4 vs. N+ ≥4: 40.856 (95% CI: 38.806-42.919) vs. 22.000 (95% CI: 18.283-25.717) vs. 15.000 (95% CI: 11.520-18.480) months, P<0.001]. In post hoc analysis, a significant difference was found between adjacent groups (N0 vs. N+ <4, P<0.001; N+ <4 vs. N+ ≥4, P=0.004).

Conclusions

Patients with ICC in the SEER database were reaffirmed to have worse prognosis with an increasing number of metastatic LNs.

Local surgery improves survival in elderly patients with stage IV breast cancer: a population-based retrospective cohort study

Background

Little is known about the role of local therapy in elderly patients with stage IV breast cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of local therapy including surgery and radiotherapy in this kind of population by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Methods

Eligible patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 were selected from the SEER database. Baseline characteristics, way of local therapy and survival information were collected for survival and analysis of prognostic factors. Cause-specific survival (CSS) curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method and compared by the log-rank test. Cox regression and multivariate competing risk analyses were used to analyze prognosis factors.

Results

A total of 1,900 patients were enrolled with the median age of 71 (range, 65 to 95) years. The 5-year CSS of patients with surgery was significantly better than that of those who did not (36.5% vs. 22.4%, P<0.001). Moreover, surgery was an independent protective factor for CSS in both multivariate Cox regression analysis [hazard ratio (HR), 0.588; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.485-0.643; P<0.001] and multivariate competing risk analysis [subdistribution HR (SHR), 0.620; 95% CI, 0.535-0.718; P<0.001]. Stratified analysis showed that most subgroup patients could benefit from surgery. The 5-year CSS of patients with radiotherapy was comparable to those without radiotherapy (28.9% vs. 26.5%, P=0.060), and radiotherapy was not an independent prognostic factor for CSS (SHR, 1.005; 95% CI, 0.846-1.202; P=0.954). However, subgroup analysis found that patients with moderate grade in histopathology, luminal A, or triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype could benefit from radiotherapy (all P<0.05).

Conclusions

Elderly patients with stage IV breast cancer can benefit from surgical treatment. This study helps to select the appropriate group for local surgery or radiotherapy according to the personal situation of the elderly to obtain the maximum benefit.

Evaluation of nodal status in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a population-based study

Background

Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is a well-established prognostic factor for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC), but there are still some controversies relating to the evaluation of nodal status. Therefore, we investigated the role of lymph node dissection (LND), compared the prognostic performances of different nodal staging systems, and then developed and validated a nomogram to predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) of ICC patients.

Methods

The study cohort was taken from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Akaike information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, Harrell's C-index and area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to evaluate the different staging models. The nomogram for the CSS was constructed based on Cox regression models and validated by calibration curves. Decision curve analysis was introduced to examine the clinical value of the models.

Results

A total of 664 patients were enrolled, and 331 (51.4%) patients underwent LND. An increasing number of lymph nodes retrieved showed no oncologic benefit (P=0.876). LNM was identified in 103 (31.1%) patients, which was the cause of their poor prognoses (5-yr CSS 13.1% versus 44.9%, P<0.001). Patients without LNM could not benefit from adjuvant therapy after propensity score matching (P=0.140). Based on the Youden index, 4 or more lymph nodes retrieved might be adequate for accurate staging. The lymph node ratio (LNR) classification, with an optimal cut-off value of 0.15, displayed the best prognostic performance. Age, size, tumor number, T Stage, grade and the LNR classification were independent predictive factors for the CSS in ICC patients. The nomogram for predicting the CSS of ICC patients according to the independent factors was well calibrated and it showed better discrimination power and higher net benefits than the American Joint Committee on Cancer (8th edition) staging system.

Conclusions

LNM is an independent prognostic factor in ICC. Although it shows no oncologic benefits, LND should still be considered as a method of stratifying patients, with 4 or more lymph nodes retrieved potentially enough to do so. LNR appears to be a promising and easy-to-use prognosticator for nodal staging. The constructed nomogram could serve as an effective tool to predict the CSS probabilities of ICC patients.

The association between molecular type and prognosis of patients with stage IV breast cancer: an observational study based on SEER database

Background

Molecular subtype, the basis for personalized treatment of breast cancer, is of great value in evaluating prognosis and guiding treatment of early-stage breast cancer. However, its value in stage IV patients remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the association between molecular subtype and prognosis of de novo stage IV breast cancer using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with the purpose to provide evidence for optimal therapeutic options for breast cancer patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed de novo stage IV breast cancer patients with the SEER Program data from 2010 to 2015. Characteristics of patients with different molecular subtypes were compared by chi-square test and survival curves for breast cancer specific survival (BCSS) according to subtypes were plotted by Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was performed to search for independent prognostic factors in stage IV breast cancer patients.

Results

A total of 11,974 patients were included in this study, among which 7,100 (59.30%) patients were of HR⁺/HER2^-, 2,093 (17.48%) of HR⁺/HER2⁺, 1,139 (9.51%) of HR^-/HER2⁺ and 1,642 (13.71%) of HR^-/HER2^-. Multivariate Cox analysis revealed that molecular subtype, age, race, marital status, grade, surgery and chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors for BCSS in de novo stage IV patients. Taking HR⁺/HER2^- patients as reference, HR⁺/HER2⁺ patients had better BCSS (HR =0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.88, P<0.001), HR^-/ HER2^- patients had worse BCSS (HR =1.42, 95% CI: 1.29-1.46, P<0.001) and HR^-/HER2⁺ patients had no significant difference (HR =1.03, 95% CI: 0.98-1.08, P=0.188). In patients with different single organ metastases, the prognosis of HR⁺/HER2⁺ subtype was the best (except brain metastasis), while that of HR^-/HER2^- subtype was the worst.

Conclusions

Molecular subtypes were closely associated with the prognosis of de novo stage IV breast cancer. Among the four subtypes, HR⁺/HER2⁺ patients had the best prognosis while HR^-/HER2^- patients had the worst. The prognosis of patients with different single organ metastases was the same, but in patients with brain metastases, HR⁺/HER2⁺ ones did not have a significantly better prognosis than other subtypes except triple-negative type.