Penile cancer in Ireland - A national review

Global Burden of Penile Cancer: A Review of Health Disparities for a Rare Disease

We performed a narrative review evaluating the influence of race and socioeconomic status for penile cancer patients based on region. We found higher incidence in underdeveloped nations. Globally, HPV-associated tumors are more prevalent, particularly in areas with high HPV and HIV infection. Socioeconomic determinants exacerbated these disparities. Similarly, in the United States, disparities were notable among racial and ethnic groups, with black men having worse survival. Understanding sociodemographic differences may help mitigate disparities by improving access to care with targeted interventions including education on risk factors and HPV vaccination to reduce penile cancer burden in vulnerable parts of the world.

Phallus preservation and reconstruction: 5-year outcomes of national penile cancer centralisation in the Republic of Ireland

INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer is a rare urological malignancy with an age-standardised incidence of 0.8 per 100,000 person-years [1]. Given this low incidence it has been suggested that centralised care may improve patient outcomes in relation to phallus sparing surgery and nodal assessment [2]. We aim to assess the outcomes after 5-years of national centralisation of penile cancer care.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed. All patients undergoing penile cancer surgery from January 2018 to December 2022 following centralisation of care were included. The primary outcome was proportion of phallus sparing procedures performed. Secondary outcomes were patient characteristics, histologic outcomes and procedures performed.

RESULTS

124 patients underwent surgery in the study period. Mean age was 64.49 (±13.87). Overall, 82.3% of patients underwent phallus sparing surgery. This remained stable over the 5-year period from 2018 to 2022 ​at 92%, 85%, 76%, 79% and 78% respectively (p ​= ​0.534). 62.7% had reconstruction performed, including split-thickness skin graft neoglans formation, (57.8% [n ​= ​37]), preputial flap (32.8% [n ​= ​21]), glans resurfacing (4.7% [n ​= ​3]), shaft advancement flap (1.6% [n ​= ​1]), penile shaft skin graft (1.6% [n ​= ​1]), and partial penectomy with urethral centralisation (1.6% [n ​= ​1]). Phallus preservation was not affected by positive nodal status (OR 0.75 [95% CI 0.249-2.266], p ​= ​0.564) or T-stage ≥1b (OR 0.51 [95% CI 0.153-1.711], p ​= ​0.276). There has been a significant reduction in Nx nodal status from 64% in 2017 to 15% in 2021 (p ​= ​0.009).

CONCLUSION

Centralisation of treatment for rare malignancies such as penile cancer may improve oncologic outcomes and rates of phallus preservation. This study has shown centralisation to has a high rate of phallus preservation. Further long-term analysis of outcomes in Ireland is required.

Epidemiology of penile cancer in Poland compared to other European countries

OBJECTIVES

To examine the epidemiology of penile cancer in Poland compared to other European countries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Incidence and mortality data were acquired from the national cancer registries in Europe and WHO Mortality Database, respectively. The data are presented as age-standardised morbidity and mortality rates, calculated according to the standard population of the world. We utilised Joinpoint analysis to assess the trends in morbidity and mortality and calculated the average rate of increase or decrease (Annual Percentage Change, Average Annual Percentage Change). Additionally, we estimate the proxy survival rates for each country.

RESULTS

Our study is the first to cover the incidence of penile cancer in many European countries and estimates an approximate survival rate for large populations, which is rarely cited in the literature. The 40+ age group presented graphically in the article covered more than 90% of penile cancer cases and deaths. In the countries examined, there was an excess of deaths over incidence in the oldest age groups (75 years or older). Poland had intermediate incidence and mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Unlike many European countries, Poland is witnessing an increasing trend of penile cancer mortality. The higher death toll among those aged 75 years or older may suggest a lack of recognition of cancer symptoms and inadequate attention to elderly patients by the healthcare system. There is also evidence of underreporting penile cancer cases. Establishing centralised healthcare systems for rare cancers is a commendable development that should be emulated by other European countries, including Poland.

Centralizing Penile Cancer Care in Germany and Austria: Just a Dream or a Fast-Approaching Reality? Results of a Survey Study among Urological Department Chairs and Modeling of Real Treatment Numbers of Penile Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

In countries characterized by a centralization of therapy management, patients with penile cancer (PeCa) have shown improvements in guideline adherence and ultimately, improved carcinoma-specific survival. Germany and Austria (G + A) have no state-regulated centralization of PeCa management, and the perspectives of urological university department chairs (UUDCs) in these countries, who act as drivers of professional and political developments, on this topic are currently unknown.

METHODS

Surveys containing 36 response options, including specific questions regarding perspectives on PeCa centralization, were sent to the 48 UUDC in G + A in January 2023. In addition to analyzing the responses, closely following the CROSS checklist, a modeling of the real healthcare situation of in-house PeCa patients in G + A was conducted.

RESULTS

The response rate was 75% (36/48). 94% and 89% of the UUDCs considered PeCa centralization meaningful and feasible in the medium term, respectively. Among the UUDCs, 72% estimated centralization within university hospitals as appropriate, while 28% favored a geographically oriented approach. Additionally, 97% of the UUDCs emphasized the importance of bridging the gap until implementation of centralization by establishing PeCa second-opinion portals. No country-specific differences were observed. The median number of in-house PeCa cases at the university hospitals in G + A was 13 (interquartile range: 9-26). A significant positive correlation was observed between the annual number of in-house PeCa cases at a given university hospital and the perspective of the UUDCs that centralization as meaningful by its UUDC (0.024). Under assumptions permissible for modeling, the average number of in-house PeCa cases in academic hospitals in G + A was approximately 30 times higher than in nonacademic hospitals.

CONCLUSION

This study provides the first data on the perspectives of UUDCs in G + A concerning centralization of PeCa therapy management. Even without state-regulated centralization in G + A, there is currently a clear focusing of PeCa treatments in university hospitals. Further necessary steps toward a structured PeCa centralization are discussed in this manuscript.

Penile cancer in younger men-A more aggressive disease?

INTRODUCTION

Penile cancer (PC) in men under 45 is very rare with an incidence of 0.1 to 0.8/100,000. There is little published data on disease characteristics and outcomes of PC in younger men. Herein, we evaluate the disease characteristics and outcomes of penile cancer in younger men compared to an older cohort.

METHODS

This study included all men diagnosed with PC at our institution from 2016 to 2021. Primary outcomes included overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and disease-free survival. Secondary outcomes included disease characteristics and surgical management. Men aged ≤45 years (Group A) were compared with men aged >45 years (Group B) at diagnosis.

RESULTS

There were 90 patients treated for invasive PC over the study period. The median age at diagnosis was 64 (26-88). The mean length of follow-up was 27 (±18) months. There were 12 (13%) in Group A, and 78 (87%) patients in Group B. Group A had a worse cancer-specific survival compared to Group B (39 months vs. not reached, HR 0.1 (95%CI 0.02-0.85, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in overall or disease-free survival between both groups. More men in Group A had lymph node metastases at the time of diagnosis (58% vs. 19%, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in histopathological features including tumor subtype, grade, T stage, p53 status or presence of lymphovascular or perineural invasion.

CONCLUSION

In our study, younger men were more likely to have nodal involvement at time of diagnosis and had a worse cancer-specific survival.

Penile squamous cell carcinoma exclusive to the shaft, with a proposal for a novel staging system

Penile squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) originating in the shaft are rare. pT1/pT2 categories in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual (8th edition) are poorly defined for SCCs arising in the dorsal shaft as anatomic structures differ between the glans and dorsal shaft (corpus spongiosum vs dartos/Buck's fascia, respectively). We reviewed six penile SCC cases exclusive to the shaft, an unusual presentation, identified amongst 120 patients treated with penectomy. We propose a novel pT staging system for dorsal shaft tumors tailored to its anatomic landmarks, where tumors extending to Buck's fascia are considered pT2 instead of pT1. The mean age at penectomy, average duration of follow-up, and mean depth of invasion were 64 years, 45 months, and 9.8 mm, respectively. Four cases were moderately differentiated, HPV-negative SCCs of the usual type and two cases were HPV-positive basaloid and warty-basaloid carcinomas. Three cases had nodal or distant metastasis at the time of penectomy, and histologic assessment in these cases showed invasion into the Buck's fascia or deeper. According to the current AJCC system, only one of these three cases would be staged as ≥ pT2. In contrast, all three metastatic tumors would be staged as ≥ pT2 in the proposed model. At last follow-up, one patient died of disease-related complications. Based on this limited series, the proposed staging model appears to suggest better patient stratification for pT1/pT2 stages. This model incorporates Buck's fascia, which has been postulated as a pathway of tumor infiltration. Additional studies are needed to validate this model.

Clinical Lymph Node Involvement as a Predictor for Cancer-Specific Survival in Patients with Penile Squamous Cell Cancer

We aimed to identify prognostic predictive factors of patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). This retrospective study reviewed the clinical and pathological data of patients with PSCC at 10 institutions in Japan between January 2008 and December 2019. The primary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS). We also identified useful predictive factors for CSS in patients with PSCC. In total, 64 patients with PSCC were enrolled. At the end of the follow-up period, 15 patients (23.4%) died owing to PSCC and six (9.4%) died owing to other causes. The 2- and 3-year CSS rates were 78.9% and 76.6%, respectively. Using the Kaplan−Meier method, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0, serum albumin levels ≥4.2 g/dL, hemoglobin levels ≥13.2 g/dL, C-reactive protein levels <0.21 mg/dL, clinical T stage ≤2, clinically negative lymph node (LN) status, and tumor size <30 mm were associated with a significantly better CSS. In the multivariate analysis, the clinically positive LN status was a significant predictive factor for CSS in patients with PSCC. Further prospective large-scale and long-term studies are required to validate our findings.