Mechanistic toxicogenomic analysis of WAY-144122 administration in Sprague–Dawley rats

Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B inhibits adipocyte differentiation and mediates TNFα action in obesity

Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) is a negative regulator of systemic glucose and insulin homeostasis; however, its exact role in adipocytes is poorly understood. This study was to elucidate the role of PTP1B in adipocyte differentiation and its implication in obesity. During differentiation of 3T3-L1 white preadipocytes, PTP1B decreased progressively with adipocyte maturation. Lentivirus-mediated PTP1B overexpression in preadipocytes delayed adipocyte differentiation, shown as lack of mature adipocytes, low level of lipid accumulation, and down-regulation of main markers (PPARγ2, SREBP-1c, FAS and LPL). In contrast, lentivirus-mediated PTP1B knockdown accelerated adipocyte differentiation, demonstrated as full of mature adipocytes, high level of lipid accumulation, and up-regulation of main markers. Dominant-negative inhibition on endogenous PTP1B by lentivirus-mediated overexpression of PTP1B double mutant in Tyr-46 and Asp-181 residues (LV-D/A-Y/F) also stimulated adipogenesis, more efficient than PTP1B knockdown. Diet-induced obesity mice exhibited an up-regulation of PTP1B and TNFα accompanied by a down-regulation of PPARγ2 in white adipose tissue. TNFα recombinant protein impeded PTP1B reduction and inhibited adipocyte differentiation in vitro; this inhibitory effect was prevented by LV-D/A-Y/F. Moreover, PTP1B inhibitor treatment improved adipogenesis and suppressed TNFα in adipose tissue of obese mice. All together, PTP1B negatively regulates adipocyte development and may mediate TNFα action to impair adipocyte differentiation in obesity. Our study provides novel evidence for the importance of PTP1B in obesity and for the potential application of PTP1B inhibitors.

Liver hypertrophy: a review of adaptive (adverse and non-adverse) changes--conclusions from the 3rd International ESTP Expert Workshop

Preclinical toxicity studies have demonstrated that exposure of laboratory animals to liver enzyme inducers during preclinical safety assessment results in a signature of toxicological changes characterized by an increase in liver weight, hepatocellular hypertrophy, cell proliferation, and, frequently in long-term (life-time) studies, hepatocarcinogenesis. Recent advances over the last decade have revealed that for many xenobiotics, these changes may be induced through a common mechanism of action involving activation of the nuclear hormone receptors CAR, PXR, or PPARα. The generation of genetically engineered mice that express altered versions of these nuclear hormone receptors, together with other avenues of investigation, have now demonstrated that sensitivity to many of these effects is rodent-specific. These data are consistent with the available epidemiological and empirical human evidence and lend support to the scientific opinion that these changes have little relevance to man. The ESTP therefore convened an international panel of experts to debate the evidence in order to more clearly define for toxicologic pathologists what is considered adverse in the context of hepatocellular hypertrophy. The results of this workshop concluded that hepatomegaly as a consequence of hepatocellular hypertrophy without histologic or clinical pathology alterations indicative of liver toxicity was considered an adaptive and a non-adverse reaction. This conclusion should normally be reached by an integrative weight of evidence approach.

Effects of Hepatic Drug-metabolizing Enzyme Induction on Clinical Pathology Parameters in Animals and Man

Hepatic drug-metabolizing enzyme (DME) induction is an adaptive response associated with changes in preclinical species; this response can include increases in liver weight, hepatocellular hyperplasia and hypertrophy, and upregulated tissue expression of DMEs. Effects of DME induction on clinical pathology markers of hepatobiliary injury and function in animals as well as humans are not well established. This component of a multipart review of the comparative pathology of xenobiotically mediated induction of hepatic metabolizing enzymes reviews pertinent data from retrospective and prospective preclinical and clinical studies. Particular attention is given to studies with confirmation of DME induction and concurrent evaluation of liver and/or serum hepatobiliary marker enzyme activities and histopathology. These results collectively indicate that in the rat, when histologic findings are limited to hepatocellular hypertrophy, DME induction is not expected to be associated with consistent or substantive changes in serum or plasma activity of hepatobiliary marker enzymes such as alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma glutamyltransferase. In the dog and the monkey, published studies also do not demonstrate a consistent relationship across DME-inducing agents and changes in these clinical pathology parameters. However, increased liver alkaline phosphatase or gamma glutamyltransferase activity in dogs treated with phenobarbital or corticosteroids suggests that direct or indirect induction of select hepatobiliary injury markers can occur both in the absence of liver injury and independently of induction of DME activity. Although correlations between tissue and serum levels of these hepatobiliary markers are limited and inconsistent, increases in serum/plasma activities that are substantial or involve changes in other markers generally reflect hepatobiliary insult rather than DME induction. Extrahepatic effects, including disruption of the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis, can also occur as a direct outcome of hepatic DME induction in humans and animals. Importantly, hepatic DME induction and associated changes in preclinical species are not necessarily predictive of the occurrence, magnitude, or enzyme induction profile in humans.

Pathway analysis tools and toxicogenomics reference databases for risk assessment

The pharmaceutical industry has begun to leverage a range of new technologies (proteomics, pharmacogenomics, metabolomics and molecular toxicology [e.g., toxicogenomics]) and analysis tools that are becoming increasingly integrated in the area of drug discovery and development. The approach of analyzing the vast amount of toxicogenomics data generated using molecular pathway and networks analysis tools in combination with analysis of reference data will be the main focus of this review. We will demonstrate how this combined approach can increase the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that lead to chemical-induced toxicity and application of this knowledge to compound risk assessment. We will provide an example of the insights achieved through a molecular toxicology analysis based on the well-known hepatotoxicant lipopolysaccharide to illustrate the utility of these new tools in the analysis of complex data sets, both in vivo and in vitro. The ultimate objective is a better lead selection process that improves the chances for success across the different stages of drug discovery and development.

Inhibition of the protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B: potential therapy for obesity, insulin resistance and type-2 diabetes mellitus

The global epidemic of obesity and type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has highlighted the need for new therapeutic approaches. The association of insulin resistance with these disorders and the knowledge that insulin receptor signaling is mediated by tyrosine (Tyr) phosphorylation have generated great interest in the regulation of the balance between Tyr phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Several protein Tyr phosphatases (PTPs) have been implicated in the regulation of insulin action, with the most convincing data for PTP1B. Murine models targeting PTP1B, PTP1B(-/-)mice, demonstrate enhanced insulin sensitivity without the weight gain seen with other insulin sensitizers such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) agonists, probably due to a second action of PTP1B as a negative regulator of leptin signaling. Despite intensive efforts and recent progress, a safe, selective and efficacious PTP1B inhibitor has yet to be identified.

Application of genomics in preclinical drug safety evaluation

Understanding the response of biological systems to xenobiotics is fundamental to the evaluation of drug safety. Toxicologists have traditionally gathered pathological, morphological, chemical and biochemical information from in vivo studies of preclinical species in order to assess drug safety and to determine how new drugs can be safely administered to the human patient population. In recent years the emerging "-omics" technologies have been developed and integrated into preclinical studies in order to better assess drug safety by gaining information on the cellular and molecular events underlying adverse drug reactions. Genomics approaches in particular have become readily available and are being applied in several stages of drug development. The burgeoning literature on what has become known as "toxicogenomics" has for the most part highlighted successful applications of gene expression profiling in predictive toxicology, enabling decisions to be made on the developability of a compound early in the drug development process. It is also becoming apparent that toxicogenomic approaches are good starting points to develop experiments designed to gain a mechanistic insight into drug toxicities within and across species. Gene expression arrays permit the measurement of responses of essentially all the genes in the entire genome to be monitored, and knowledge of the function of the genes affected can identify the potential mechanisms to then be confirmed using conventional biochemical, toxicological and pathological approaches. As toxicologists put these technologies into practice they build up a knowledge base to better characterize toxicities at the molecular level and to make the search for much needed, novel biomarkers of toxicity more achievable.

Toxicogenomics in drug discovery and development: mechanistic analysis of compound/class-dependent effects using the DrugMatrix® database

A range of genomics technologies are increasingly becoming integrated with existing scientific disciplines to broaden and strengthen existing capabilities and open new avenues of research in drug discovery and development. Examples of these new research fields are proteomics, pharmacogenomics, metabolomics and toxicogenomics. Here we review the application of toxicogenomics to improve the evaluation of drug safety, mechanism of action and toxicity in the drug discovery and development process.

Toxicogenomics and systems toxicology: aims and prospects

Toxicogenomics combines transcript, protein and metabolite profiling with conventional toxicology to investigate the interaction between genes and environmental stress in disease causation. The patterns of altered molecular expression that are caused by specific exposures or disease outcomes have revealed how several toxicants act and cause disease. Despite these success stories, the field faces noteworthy challenges in discriminating the molecular basis of toxicity. We argue that toxicology is gradually evolving into a systems toxicology that will eventually allow us to describe all the toxicological interactions that occur within a living system under stress and use our knowledge of toxicogenomic responses in one species to predict the modes-of-action of similar agents in other species.

Ertiprotafib Improves Glycemic Control and Lowers Lipids via Multiple Mechanisms

Ertiprotafib belongs to a novel class of insulin sensitizers developed for treatment of type 2 diabetes. In insulin-resistant rodent models, ertiprotafib and a close analog lowered both fasting blood glucose and insulin levels and improved glycemic excursion during an oral glucose tolerance test. In addition, treatment of rodents improved lipid profiles, with significantly lowered triglyceride and free fatty acid levels. These results suggested that this therapeutic activity might involve mechanisms in addition to PTP1b inhibition. In this study, we demonstrate that ertiprotafib activates peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)alpha and PPARgamma at concentrations comparable with those of known agonists of these regulators. Furthermore, it is able to drive adipocyte differentiation of C3H10T(1/2) cells, a hallmark of PPARgamma activation. Livers from ertiprotafib-treated animals showed significant induction of acyl-CoA oxidase activity, probably caused by PPARalpha engagement in these animals. We also show that ertiprotafib inhibits PTP1b in vitro with nonclassic kinetics at concentrations above its EC(50) for PPAR agonism. Thus, the complete mechanism of action for ertiprotafib and related compounds in vivo may involve multiple independent mechanisms, including (but not necessarily limited to) PTP1b inhibition and dual PPARalpha/PPARgamma agonism. Ertiprotafib pharmacology and interpretation of clinical results must be seen in light of this complexity.