Thrombophilic abnormalities and recurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients treated with standardized anticoagulant treatment

Interventional treatment for post-thrombotic chronic venous obstruction: Progress and challenges

Chronic venous obstruction, including nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions and post-thrombotic syndrome, presents a significant burden on patients' quality of life and health care systems. Venous recanalization and stenting have emerged as promising minimally invasive approaches, yet challenges in patient selection, procedural techniques, and long-term outcomes persist. This review synthesizes current knowledge on the interventional treatment of post-thrombotic syndrome, focusing on the evolution of endovascular techniques and stenting. Patient selection criteria, procedural details, and the characteristics of dedicated venous stents are discussed. Particular emphasis is given to the role of inflow and other anatomical considerations, along with postoperative management protocols for an optimal long-term outcome.

Direct oral anticoagulants for deep vein thrombosis among patients with hereditary thrombophilia-A cohort study

OBJECTIVES

to evaluate direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with hereditary thrombophilia and deep venous thrombosis (DVT).

METHODS

This is a retrospective observational study.

RESULTS

In total, 45 patients were treated between 01/2012 and 12/2022 (mean follow-up: 1.5 +/- 0.3 years). The most frequent thrombophilias were heterozygous V Leiden (20%), heterozygous MTHFR C677T (37.8%), heterozygous MTHFR A1298C (24.4%), and hyperhomocysteinemia (26.7%). The patients received rivaroxaban (n = 19), apixaban (n = 15), and dabigatran (n = 11). Three cases presented symptoms' recurrence without evidence of thrombosis' recurrence (two under rivaroxaban and one under apixaban; p > .05). These patients improved under parenteral anticoagulation and were further treated with dabigatran. No other event or major bleeding occurred during the follow-up. The presence of more than two factors was associated with acute recurrence of symptoms (OR = 25.9; 95% CI [1.454-461.262]; p = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs seem to be safe and efficient for patients with hereditary thrombophilia and DVT. The presence of more than two thrombophilia factors is associated with a higher risk for symptom recurrence. Although statistically non-significant, symptoms' recurrence was also observed more frequently among patients under anti-Xa inhibitors than antithrombin inhibitors. This should be verified in larger comparative studies.

Predicting the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism: Impact and therapeutic consequences of inherited thrombophilia

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, thrombophilia testing in patients with venous thrombo-embolism has increased tremendously. However, the role of inherited thrombophilie in prediction the risk of recurrence remains controversial. Consequently, it is still unclear whether thrombophilia testing influences decisions regarding duration of anticoagulation in clinical practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact if inherited thrombophilia on venous thrombosis treatment decisions and on predicting the risk of recurrence.

METHODS

A retrospective longitudinal study (January 2011-Decembre 2016) including 131 patients with confirmed venous thrombo-embolism referred to the hematology laboratory from the internal medicine department for inherited thrombophilia screening was carried out.

RESULTS

The mean age patients was 39.4 years and the sex ratio (M/F) was 0.61. Inherited thrombophilia was confirmed in 27.5% of patients. A long term anticoagulation was decided in 46.9% of patients with thrombophilia. There was no significant difference in the duration of anticoagulation between patients with or without thrombophilia. Thrombosis recurrence was recorded in 16 (17%) patients. The 24 years cumulative incidence of recurrence was 19% in patients with thrombophilia and 17% in those without (plog Rank= 0.6). Inherited thrombophilia was not associated with increased risk of recurrence after treatment withdrawal (Hazard ratio=1.31 IC (0.47-3.63); P=0.6).

CONCLUSION

In clinical practice, inherited thrombophilia did not influence anticoagulation duration and was not associated with a higher venous thrombosis risk of recurrence. It seems to be less relevant for decision making than presumed.

Genetic Risk Profiling Associated with Recurrent Unprovoked Venous Thromboembolism

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE), is a common, acute, multifactorial disease with a five-years cumulative incidence of recurrence of approximately 25%. Actually, no single genetic defect can predict the risk of recurrence of VTE. Therefore, individual genetic risk profiling could be useful for the prediction of VTE recurrence.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To assess the combined effect of the common prothrombotic genotypes on the risk of recurrence of VTE in recently diagnosed unprovoked VTE patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This population based, prospective follow-up study was carried out from January 2015 to December 2020 in (internal medicine, cardiovascular medicine and anesthesia and ICU departments, Tanta University Hospital, Egypt) on 224 recently diagnosed unprovoked VTE patients. Whole blood was collected by standard venipuncture at the time of admission prior to the beginning of anticoagulant therapy. Genomic DNA was extracted and was genotyped for the 5-SNPs Genetic risk score (GRS), previously validated for first venous thrombosis (FVL rs6025, PTM rs1799963, ABO rs8176719, FGG rs2066865 and FXI rs2036914).

RESULTS

The main important finding in the present study was that patients having ≥3 risk alleles were associated with higher risk of VTE recurrence compared to those having ≤2 risk alleles (the reference group) (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.48-4.21) (p = 0.001). Patients with GRS ≥ 3 had a significantly shorter time recurrence free survival (43.07 months) compared to the low risk group of patients with GRS (0-2) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

GRS model could be an effective and useful model in risk stratification of VTE patients, and genetic risk profiling of VTE patients could be used for the prediction of recurrence of VTE.

Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism After an Initial Episode: Risk Stratification and Implications for Long-term Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common condition with significant associated morbidity and mortality. Recurrent VTE after an initial episode is a preventable medical condition. The following review discusses data supporting recurrence risk estimates after an initial VTE episode as well as treatment strategies to mitigate risk of recurrent VTE.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review particularly highlights methods for stratifying the risk of recurrent VTE and recent studies that have evaluated direct oral anticoagulants for the prevention of recurrent VTE. Risk assessment for VTE recurrence should guide anticoagulation duration. In patients who present with unprovoked VTE events, there remains a high risk of recurrence that is significantly mitigated with extended duration anticoagulation with either a vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant.

Secondary prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism after initial oral anticoagulation therapy in patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

Currently, little evidence is available on the length and type of anticoagulation used for extended treatment for prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with unprovoked VTE who have completed initial oral anticoagulation therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of available oral therapeutic options (aspirin, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)) for extended thromboprophylaxis in adults with a first unprovoked VTE, to prevent VTE recurrence after completion of an acceptable initial oral anticoagulant treatment period, as defined in individual studies.

SEARCH METHODS

For this review, the Cochrane Vascular Information Specialist (CIS) searched the Specialised Register (March 2017) as well as the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2017, Issue 2). We also searched trials registries (March 2017) and reference lists of relevant articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials in which patients with a first, symptomatic, objectively confirmed, unprovoked VTE, who had been initially treated with anticoagulants, were randomised to extended prophylaxis (vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), antiplatelet agents, or DOACs) versus no prophylaxis or placebo. We also included trials that compared one type of extended prophylaxis versus another type of extended prophylaxis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies, assessed quality, and extracted data. We resolved disagreements by discussion.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies with a combined total of 3436 participants met the inclusion criteria. Five studies compared extended prophylaxis versus placebo: three compared warfarin versus placebo, and two compared aspirin versus placebo. One study compared one type of extended prophylaxis (rivaroxaban) versus another type of extended prophylaxis (aspirin). For extended prophylaxis versus placebo, we downgraded the quality of the evidence for recurrent VTE and all-cause mortality to moderate owing to concerns arising from risks of selection and performance bias in individual studies. For all other outcomes in this review, we downgraded the quality of the evidence to low owing to concerns arising from risk of bias for the studies stated above, combined with concerns over imprecision. For extended prophylaxis versus other extended prophylaxis, we downgraded the quality of the evidence for recurrent VTE and major bleeding to moderate owing to concerns over imprecision. Risk of bias in the individual study was low.Meta-analysis showed that extended prophylaxis was no more effective than placebo in preventing VTE-related mortality (odds ratio (OR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.14 to 6.98; 1862 participants; 4 studies; P = 0.98; low-quality evidence), recurrent VTE (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.03; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.07; moderate-quality evidence), major bleeding (OR 1.84, 95% CI 0.87 to 3.85; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.86; low-quality evidence), all-cause mortality (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.57; 2043 participants; 5 studies; P = 0.99; moderate-quality evidence), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 1.78, 95% CI 0.59 to 5.33; 1672 participants; 4 studies; P = 0.30; low-quality evidence), stroke (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.39 to 3.46; 1224 participants; 2 studies; P = 0.80; low-quality evidence), or myocardial infarction (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.87; 1495 participants; 3 studies; P = 1.00; low-quality evidence).One study showed that the novel oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban was associated with fewer recurrent VTEs than aspirin (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.54; 1389 participants; P = 0.0001; moderate-quality evidence). Data show no clear differences in the incidence of major bleeding between rivaroxaban and aspirin (OR 3.06, 95% CI 0.37 to 25.51; 1389 participants; P = 0.30; moderate-quality evidence) nor in the incidence of clinically relevant non-major bleeding (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.94; 1389 participants; 1 study; P = 0.69; moderate-quality evidence). Data on VTE-related mortality, all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction were not yet available for participants with unprovoked VTE and will be incorporated in future versions of the review.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Evidence is currently insufficient to permit definitive conclusions concerning the effectiveness and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis in prevention of recurrent VTE after initial oral anticoagulation therapy among participants with unprovoked VTE. Additional good-quality large-scale randomised controlled trials are required before firm conclusions can be reached.

Prognosis and Monitoring of VTE

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can present in a variety of different clinical settings and in a diverse, comorbid patient population, both of which will guide the clinician toward the appropriate therapeutic response. Patients who present with pulmonary embolism are at risk for hemodynamic instability, recurrence of VTE, cardiac comorbidities, and increased risk of overall mortality. Prognostication models have been clinically validated for risk stratification and prediction of mortality. Similar to pulmonary embolism, patients with deep vein thrombosis carry a higher risk of VTE recurrence and cardiac comorbidities. Consequently, VTE can be treated by a variety of methods such as anticoagulants or inferior vena cava filters, which bear their own risks and benefits. It is imperative that clinicians monitor patients for complications from VTE and the chosen therapy.

Personalized medicine in thrombosis: back to the future

Most physicians believe they practiced personalized medicine prior to the genomics era that followed the sequencing of the human genome. The focus of personalized medicine has been primarily genomic medicine, wherein it is hoped that the nucleotide dissimilarities among different individuals would provide clinicians with more precise understanding of physiology, more refined diagnoses, better disease risk assessment, earlier detection and monitoring, and tailored treatments to the individual patient. However, to date, the "genomic bench" has not worked itself to the clinical thrombosis bedside. In fact, traditional plasma-based hemostasis-thrombosis laboratory testing, by assessing functional pathways of coagulation, may better help manage venous thrombotic disease than a single DNA variant with a small effect size. There are some new and exciting discoveries in the genetics of platelet reactivity pertaining to atherothrombotic disease. Despite a plethora of genetic/genomic data on platelet reactivity, there are relatively little actionable pharmacogenetic data with antiplatelet agents. Nevertheless, it is crucial for genome-wide DNA/RNA sequencing to continue in research settings for causal gene discovery, pharmacogenetic purposes, and gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. The potential of genomics to advance medicine will require integration of personal data that are obtained in the patient history: environmental exposures, diet, social data, etc. Furthermore, without the ritual of obtaining this information, we will have depersonalized medicine, which lacks the precision needed for the research required to eventually incorporate genomics into routine, optimal, and value-added clinical care.

Recurrent venous thromboembolism: what is the risk and how to prevent it

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) that includes deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism is a frequent, severe, and potentially lethal disease. After a first episode, VTE has a strong tendency to recur. While VTE is an acute disease, it may have variable outcomes in early and late phases after initial presentation. Furthermore, the incidence of late, clinically important consequences (postthrombotic syndrome and/or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension) increases in case of recurrent events. The aims of the present review are (i) to analyze the incidence and risk factors for recurrence of VTE (either those related to the type of first thrombotic event or to the patients), the risks associated with occurrence of recurrent events, and the problems linked to the diagnosis, not always easy, of recurrent events; (ii) to discuss whether or not it is possible to predict the individual risk of recurrence after a first event, by stratifying patients at high or low risk of recurrence, and how this can influence their treatment; (iii) to comment what the current guidelines and guidance suggest/recommend about anticoagulant treatment after a first VTE event and, finally, to propose practical indications on how to manage individual patients affected by VTE.

Risk factors for recurrence of venous thromboembolism associated with the use of oral contraceptives

BACKGROUND

Combined oral contraceptives (COC) increase the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), but the risk of recurrent VTE is not precisely determined. In this retrospective cohort study, we sought the risk factors for recurrence after a first VTE that occurred in women taking COC.

STUDY DESIGN

Time-to-event analysis was done with Kaplan-Meier estimates. In total, 172 patients were included (43% with pulmonary embolism): 82% had no other clinical risk factor for VTE.

RESULTS

Among the 160 patients who stopped anticoagulation, the cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE was 5.1% after 1 year and 14.2% after 5 years. Significant factors associated with recurrence were renewed use of COC [hazard ratio (HR)=8.2 (2.1-32.2)], antiphospholipid syndrome [HR=4.1 (1.3-12.5)] and protein C deficiency or factor II G20210A [HR=2.7 (1.1-7)]. Pure-progestin contraception [HR=1.3 (0.5-3.0)] or factor V Leiden [HR=1.3 (0.5-3.4)] did not increase recurrence. Postsurgical VTE had a lower risk of recurrence [HR=0.1 (0.0-0.9)].

CONCLUSION

Further studies are warranted to determine whether testing for antiphospholipid syndrome, protein C deficiency or the factor II G20210A could modify the duration of anticoagulation. This study confirms the safety of pure-progestin contraception.

[Optimum duration of anticoagulant treatment after an episode of venous thromboembolism]

Vitamin K antagonists are the mainstay for the treatment for venous thromboembolism. The optimum (VTE) course of oral anticoagulant therapy is determined according to the risk of recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulant therapy and the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding while on antivitamin K. The risk of recurrent VTE is low when the initial episode is provoked by a reversible major-risk factor (surgery), whereas this risk is high when VTE is not provoked or associated with a persistent-risk factor (cancer). Conversely, the influence of biochemical and morphological tests is uncertain. The optimum balance of the benefits and the risks of oral anticoagulant therapy is based on the frequency as well as the consequences of the risk of recurrent VTE and anticoagulant-related bleeding. After VTE provoked by a major reversible-risk factor, three months of anticoagulation is optimal, whereas after unprovoked VTE, anticoagulation should be extended. However, given the number of unresolved issues, a randomised trial comparing different durations of anticoagulation is needed.

FV Leiden mutation and risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in Serbian population

The absolute rate of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is approximately 5% per year. There is a lower rate of recurrence in provoked VTE, and higher in idiopathic one. So far, there is no consensus whether hereditary thrombophilia should be considered as a persistent risk factor, and whether it requires long-term anticoagulant therapy. The aim of our study was to estimate the risk of recurrent VTE in patients carrying FV Leiden mutation in Serbian population. In retrospective study (1994-2006), we have evaluated the risk of recurrent VTE in 56 patients who are carriers of FV Leiden mutation, in comparison to group consisting of 56 patients non-carriers of FV Leiden mutation. Patients with FII G20210A and MTHFR C677T mutations, antiphospholipid antibodies, antithrombin III, protein C or protein S deficiency, malignancies and diabetes were excluded from the study. Recurrent VTE occurred in 44.6% of the patients, carriers of the FV Leiden mutations, vs. 26.7% in non-carriers group (P<0.05). The incidence rate was 3.7 and 2.2% per year, respectively. The estimated relative risk of recurrence for FV Leiden carriers was 1.67 (95% CI 0.99-2.81, P=0.049). The 60% of patients with mutation and only 13% without mutation develop rethrombosis during first year after discontinuance of therapy (P<0.01). In our study patients with symptomatic VTE who are carriers of the FV Leiden gene mutations have a higher risk of recurrent VTE than non-carriers. Our data suggest the importance of the FV Leiden mutation detection and the estimation of the clinical condition for successful secondary prophylaxis of VTE.

Suboptimal doses of low molecular weight heparin and acute venous thromboembolism. Data from the RIETE registry

The objective was to assess the use of suboptimal doses (60-149 UI kg(-1) day(-1)) of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) in actual clinical practice and to evaluate the outcomes compared to standard doses (> or = 150 UI kg(-1) day(-1)). Retrospective analysis of data from a multicenter registry of patients with VTE (RIETE; Registro Informatizado de Enfermedad TromboEmbólica). Patient characteristics, antithrombotic treatments, and 3-month outcomes were analyzed. We studied 12,302 patients with VTE; 10,524 patients were treated initially only with LMWH; 1,547 patients received suboptimal LMWH (mean = 122 UI kg(-1) day(-1)), and 8,977 patients received full-dose LMWH (mean = 191 UI kg(-1) day(-1)). The suboptimal group included significantly more patients with recent major bleeding, weight more than 100 kg, raised creatinine, or deep vein thrombosis. No significant differences in mortality rate (7.7 vs 7.8%), VTE recurrence (2.7 vs 2.3%), or fatal hemorrhage (0.6 vs 0.6%) occurred between the suboptimal and the standard group. Major bleeding episodes occurred more frequently in the patients with pulmonary embolism treated with suboptimal LMWH (4.5 vs 2.4%; p = 0.02). In the multivariate analysis, after adjusting for bleeding risk factors, major hemorrhage was not associated with the heparin dose. Suboptimal doses of LMWH are used in actual clinical practice in a reduced group of patients at an outcome rate not very different to that of standard doses. Bleeding episodes depend more on the patient's characteristics than on the LMWH dose. Randomized trials should be performed to corroborate these results.

Who should be tested for thrombophilia?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to identify on the basis of available data and expert opinions who would benefit most from screening for thrombophilia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have clearly defined the risk of venous thromboembolism in members of families with inherited thrombophilia. Meta-analyses have shown the role of the most common thrombophilic conditions in increasing the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism in carriers. Screening for thrombophilia in venous thromboembolism patients might help identify those at higher risk of recurrences even though it is unclear how this information can be of use in modifying their management. Thrombophilia seems to play a role in early fetal losses as also shown in women at their first intended pregnancy, which makes it interesting to screen women after only one bad pregnancy outcome.

SUMMARY

Screening for thrombophilia can be performed particularly in young patients with venous thromboembolism. Carriers of inherited thrombophilia are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism recurrences. Screening families of venous thromboembolism patients with thrombophilia allows the identification of still asymptomatic carriers who may benefit from thromboprophylaxis. This may be true of women in fertile age belonging to thrombophilic families. In thrombophilic women with pregnancy complications prophylaxis may be offered to prevent recurrences.

Thrombophilia: common questions on laboratory assessment and management

Thrombophilia is an inherited or acquired predisposition to thrombosis. This article reviews the clinical manifestations of thrombophilia and addresses common questions on laboratory assessment and management: what are the potential indications for thrombophilia testing, who should be tested, what tests should be requested, when should testing be performed, and how should the test results affect primary prevention, acute therapy, and secondary prophylaxis of thrombosis.

Molecular Biology of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Recent efforts have seen major advances in elucidating the mechanisms underlying pulmonary arterial hypertension. However, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) often has been excluded from these studies. Consequently, whereas the clinical, radiographic, and hemodynamic characteristics of CTEPH have been well described, there remains a deficit in our understanding of the cellular, molecular, and genetic mechanisms underlying CTEPH. Furthermore, although prior venous thromboembolism may act as the inciting event, it is still unclear what predisposes some patients to develop CTEPH. CTEPH has two major pathogenic components. The first is the primary obstruction of central pulmonary arteries by accumulation of thrombotic material. The second is characterized by severe pulmonary vascular remodeling, similar to that seen in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Other articles in this series describe the pathological, surgical, and therapeutic aspects of CTEPH. Here, we review the potential molecular and cellular mechanisms that may contribute to the pathogenesis of CTEPH.