In vitro assessment of edoxaban anticoagulant effect in pediatric plasma

Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of edoxaban in pediatric patients

Edoxaban is an orally active inhibitor of activated factor X (FXa). Population pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) analyses were performed to characterize the PK and PK-PD relationships of edoxaban in pediatric patients to identify the covariates that may contribute to inter-subject variability in PK and PD of edoxaban in pediatric patients, and to compare the PK and PD data between pediatric and adult patients. The pediatric PK of edoxaban was best described by a two-compartment model with transit compartments, first-order oral absorption, and linear elimination. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), body weight, and post-menstrual age were the significant covariates explaining variability in edoxaban PK among pediatric patients. A function based on renal maturation was applied to edoxaban clearance. The clearance for a 70 kg patient with an eGFR of 110 mL/min/1.73 m2 was estimated to be 42.9 L/h (CV ~ 31.8%). PK simulation showed that exposures across five pediatric age groups were comparable to that in adult patients receiving 60 mg once daily dose. The PK-PD relationship for anti-factor Xa was best fit with an Emax (8.65 IU/mL) model with an EC50 of 631 ng/mL. The PK-PD relationships for activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time were best fit with linear models (slopes of 0.0467, and 0.0415 s mL/ng, respectively). In addition, due to the small number of efficacy and safety events, an exploratory analysis did not detect a correlation between efficacy events (recurrent venous thromboembolism) or safety events (clinically relevant bleeding) and edoxaban exposure.

Exposure Matching-Based Pediatric Dose Selection for Drugs with Renal Excretion - Lessons Learned from Pediatric Development of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

The pediatric clinical development programs of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) edoxaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran have recently been completed, with apixaban close to the finish line. One common pharmacokinetic (PK) characteristic of these four DOACs is that renal excretion contributes 27% or more in their elimination, resulting in age-dependent drug clearance in both pediatric and adult subjects. Several lessons have been learned from adult exposure matching and pediatric dose selection for DOACs. The main goal of this tutorial is to provide an informed perspective on pediatric dose selection for renally excreted drugs, using these four DOACs as case examples. This tutorial is organized into seven steps: (1) consideration of age-related differences in disease and response to treatment; (2) consideration of age-related differences in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion; (3) selection of the reference adult population and exposure for pediatric exposure matching; (4) prediction of pediatric clearance and pediatric dose selection based on data from young adults; (5) conduct and design of efficient pediatric PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) studies that inform dose selection; (6) assessment of exposure matching and dose adjustment using population PK simulation; (7) evaluation of the need for dose adjustment in pediatric sub-populations.

Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Safety of Edoxaban in Pediatric Subjects: A Phase I Single-Dose Study

This was an open-label, single-dose, phase I study to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics (PDs), and safety of edoxaban in pediatric subjects from birth to 18 years at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Children requiring anticoagulant therapy were enrolled into 5 age cohorts (0 to < 6 months (N = 12), 0.5 to < 2 years (N = 13), 2 to < 6 years (N = 13), 6 to < 12 years (N = 13), and 12 to < 18 years (N = 15)) receiving tablet or oral suspension of edoxaban at doses expected to be equivalent to 30 or 60 mg once daily (q.d.) in adult subjects with VTE. Sixty-six pediatric subjects were enrolled and completed the study. Edoxaban plasma concentration peaked between 1 and 3 hours and declined rapidly until 4-8 hours. The range of mean total apparent clearance across 5 age cohorts at low and high doses was 0.47 to 1.11 L/h/kg. The ranges of mean volume of central compartment and apparent peripheral volume were 2.31 to 3.59 L/kg and 1.92 to 4.14 L/kg, respectively. Across all age groups, the estimated median exposures were within the 0.5- to 1.5-fold of the median area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) in adult subjects receiving corresponding doses (30 mg q.d. for low dose and 60 mg q.d. for high dose). In all age groups, PD parameters (prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anti-Factor Xa activity) showed a linear PK-PD relationship and were in line with previous adult data. The results support further evaluation of the pediatric doses in larger pivotal trials.

Thrombin generation assays to personalize treatment in bleeding and thrombotic diseases

Treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders is highly standardized and based on evidence-based medicine guidelines. These evidence-based treatment schemes are well accepted but may lead to either insufficient treatment or over-dosing, because the individuals' hemostatic properties are not taken into account. This can potentially introduce bleeding or thrombotic complications in individual patients. With the incorporation of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) parameters, based on global assays such as thrombin generation assays (TGAs), a more personalized approach can be applied to treat either bleeding or thrombotic disorders. In this review, we will discuss the recent literature about the technical aspects of TGAs and the relation to diagnosis and management of bleeding and thrombotic disorders. In patients with bleeding disorders, such as hemophilia A or factor VII deficiency, TGAs can be used to identify patients with a more severe bleeding phenotype and also in the management with non-replacement therapy and/or bypassing therapy. These assays have also a role in patients with venous thrombo-embolism, but the usage of TGAs in patients with arterial thrombosis is less clear. However, there is a potential role for TGAs in the monitoring of (long-term) antithrombotic therapy, for example with the use of direct oral anticoagulants. Finally this review will discuss controversies, limitations and knowledge gaps in relation to the introduction of TGAs to personalize medicine in daily medical practice.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus standard anticoagulation in children treated for acute venous thromboembolism

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE) in adults. Little attention is given to pediatric VTE (PVTE). The objective of this study is to study the efficacy and safety of DOACs in published PVTE randomized control trials (RCTs). PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Cochrane Library, SinoMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched until 2021, to identify RCTs that enrolled patients with VTE <18 years of age who received DOACs versus standard anticoagulation. Outcomes were evaluated using the Mantel-Haenszel method of random-effects model. Our study evaluated seven RCTs that included 1139 cases of PVTE, which had a low risk of publication and assessment bias. Compared with standard anticoagulation, patients receiving DOACs presented a lower rate of recurrent VTE (relative risk [RR], 0.42 [confidence interval {CI}, 0.20 to 0.89]), similar mortality rate (RR, 0.50 [CI, 0.07 to 3.57]), major bleeding (RR, 0.46 [CI, 0.14 to 1.57]), and higher clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (RR, 2.71 [CI, 1.05 to 7.02]) with low heterogeneity. Limiting to subgroups, dabigatran and rivaroxaban yielded similar findings, except for a higher incidence of nonmajor bleeding during rivaroxaban use. DOACs could be an alternative to standard anticoagulation in PVTE. Dabigatran and rivaroxaban have similar effects. IMPACT: In venous thromboembolism (VTE), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used as a substitution for standard anticoagulation in most situations for adults; however, little attention is paid to the pediatric population. For pediatric VTE, previous meta-analyses have emphasized the epidemiology, risk factors, and the use of traditional anticoagulants, and seldom reported the use of novel oral anticoagulants. This is the first meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that focuses on the efficacy outcomes and safety endpoints of DOACs compared with standard anticoagulation in pediatric VTE.

Automated Thrombin Generation Assay for Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Edoxaban Measurements

Background: The thrombin generation assay (TG) is a promising approach to measure the degree of anticoagulation in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). A strong association with plasma drug concentrations would be a meaningful argument for the potential use to monitor DOAC. Objectives: We aimed to study the correlation of TG with rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban drug concentrations in a large, prospective multicenter cross-sectional study. Methods: Five-hundred and fifty-nine patients were included in nine tertiary hospitals. The Technothrombin® TG was conducted in addition to an anti-Xa assay; LC-MS/MS was performed as the reference standard. Results: Correlation (r_s) between thrombin generation measurements and drug concentrations was -0.72 for peak thrombin generation (95% confidence interval, CI, -0.77, -0.66), -0.55 for area under the curve (AUC; 95% CI -0.61, -0.48), and 0.80 for lag time (95% CI 0.75, 0.84). In contrast, r_s was 0.96 with results of the anti-Xa activity (95% CI 0.95-0.97). Sensitivity with regard to the clinically relevant cut-off value of 50 μgL^-1 was 49% in case of peak thrombin generation (95% CI, 44, 55), 29% in case of AUC (95% CI, 24, 34), and 64% in case of lag time (95% CI, 58, 69). Sensitivity of the anti-Xa assay was 95% (95% CI, 92, 97). Conclusions: The correlation of thrombin generation measurements with DOAC drug concentrations was weak, and clinically relevant drug levels were not predicted correctly. Our results do not support an application of TG in the monitoring of DOAC.