Wiping Out CGRP: Potential Cardiovascular Risks

Sex differences in the vasoactive effect of transient receptor potential channels: TRPM3 as a new therapeutic target for (neuro)vascular disorders

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Sex-dependent vascular effects of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and sex dimorphism in migraine are not yet fully characterized. We investigated the differential vasoactive effects of TRP ankyrin 1 (TRPA1), TRP melastatin 3 (TRPM3) and TRP vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) channels, their pharmacological mechanism(s), and localization and expression in human isolated blood vessels.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Agonist responses to cinnamaldehyde (TRPA1), pregnenolone sulfate (PregS, TRPM3) or capsaicin (TRPV1) were analysed using wire myography in segments of human coronary (HCAs) and middle meningeal (HMMAs) arteries from men and women. The mechanisms involved in these responses were investigated using the antagonists/blockers/inhibitors: HC-030031 (TRPA1), isosakuranetin (TRPM3), capsazepine (TRPV1), olcegepant (calcitonin gene-related peptide [CGRP] receptor), L-NAME (nitric oxide synthase [NOS]), indomethacin (cyclooxygenase [COX]), TRAM-34 + apamin (K+ channels) or MK-801 (N-methyl-d-aspartate [NMDA] receptor). Fluorescence microscopy, quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and western blotting were performed to investigate their location and expression, respectively.

KEY RESULTS

In HCAs and HMMAs, (i) capsaicin-induced relaxation remained unchanged after the above-mentioned antagonists/blockers/inhibitors and (ii) cinnamaldehyde-induced relaxation was blocked by olcegepant. PregS-induced maximal relaxation was significantly enhanced in isolated arteries from females compared with males and was inhibited after isosakuranetin, MK-801 or L-NAME. TRPM3 mRNA and protein expression, along with NMDA protein levels, were higher in arteries from females than males.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Modulation of vascular tone in HCAs and HMMAs by activation of TRPM3 is sex-dependent, likely involving NMDA receptors. This represents a new therapeutic direction, targeting sex dimorphism in migraine and its related cardiovascular events.

Unmasking the relationship between CGRP and glutamate: from peripheral excitation to central sensitization in migraine

The exact mechanisms that trigger the activation of the trigeminovascular system in migraine remain unclear. The involvement of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine is well-documented, and treatments aimed at blocking CGRP activity have proven successful in reducing migraine attacks for some patients. However, around one third of individuals do not respond to these therapies, which are also limited by factors like cost, side effects, and contraindications. There is growing evidence suggesting that glutamate, an excitatory neurotransmitter, plays a crucial role in the onset and maintenance of migraine pain, partially by enhancing CGRP release. Increased glutamate levels have been linked to both peripheral and central sensitization, potentially contributing to the development and persistence of chronic migraine. The relationship between CGRP and glutamate is complex, with glutamate possibly acting as an upstream trigger for CGRP release. This review examines the interplay between CGRP and glutamate, and their involvement in both peripheral and central sensitization. It also explores the therapeutic potential of targeting either glutamate or CGRP, aiming to address both peripheral and central migraine mechanisms. Finally, the role of triggers in migraine initiation at the peripheral level is discussed, offering insights into potential preventive strategies.

Identifying signals of disproportionate reporting for calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors: real-world evidence from the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors have been FDA-approved for migraine prophylaxis and relief. However, their safety profile remains uncertain. This study analyzes adverse events (AEs) and signals of disproportionate reporting (SDRs) using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We analyzed FAERS reports from approval through Q2 2023, standardizing terms using preferred terminology and system organ class (SOCs) classifications. Disproportionality analyses (ROR, PRR, IC) identified SDRs and inclusion in FDA prescribing information was reviewed. Additional analyses included comparisons with other migraine drugs, indication-based sensitivity analyses and causality assessment using the Bradford Hill framework.

RESULTS

Galcanezumab showed strong signals for underdose (ROR 47.4; 95% CI 43.79-51.3), alopecia (5.72; 5.09-6.43), and constipation (6.01; 5.35-6.75), while fremanezumab exhibited notable associations with alopecia (6.9; 5.72-8.33) and weight increased (6.34; 5.18-7.76). Among gepants, rimegepant was linked to somnolence (4.52; 3.57-5.73) and dizziness (3.73; 3.15-4.42) and atogepant showed a strong signal for therapy interruption (16.58; 12.86-21.38).

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights CGRP inhibitor-associated AEs, underscoring the need for clinical monitoring and risk identification. Early detection of AEs and SDRs can inform protective measures to enhance patient safety.

Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of migraine

We here present evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of migraine. These guidelines, created by the Italian Society for the Study of Headache and the International Headache Society, aim to offer clear, actionable recommendations to healthcare professionals. They incorporate evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials and expert-based opinions. The guidelines follow the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the quality of evidence. The guideline development involved a systematic review of literature across multiple databases, adherence to Cochrane review methods, and a structured framework for data extraction and interpretation. Although the guidelines provide a robust foundation for migraine treatment, they also highlight gaps in current research, such as the paucity of head-to-head drug comparisons and the need for long-term outcome studies. These guidelines serve as a resource to standardize migraine treatment and promote high-quality care across different healthcare settings.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted therapy in migraine: current role and future perspectives

Almost 40 years ago, the discovery of the vasoactive neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its role in migraine pathophysiology ushered in a new era in migraine treatment. Since 2018, monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CGRP pathway are available for migraine prevention. The approval of these drugs marks a pioneering development, as they are the first pharmacological agents specifically tailored for migraine prevention. Introduction of these agents contrasts the historical reliance on traditional preventive medications initially formulated for other indications and later repurposed for migraine therapy. Although the emergence of evidence on the efficacy and safety of CGRP-targeted mAbs has raised the bar for treatment success in migraine, their efficacy in other headache entities, such as cluster headache, is low to moderate. Small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists called gepants have also been proven to be effective both as acute and preventive migraine treatments. Furthermore, these agents have bridged the traditional categories of acute and preventive treatment strategies. Short-term prevention and treatment during the prodromal phase of migraine represent emerging strategies enabling clinicians to develop treatment approaches designed to meet changing patient needs; however, these strategies still require more formal evidence. Although solid data have been gathered, further research concerning the efficacy and long-term safety of drugs targeting the CGRP pathway and robust pharmacoeconomic evaluations are needed. Finally, randomised withdrawal and switching studies would facilitate the formulation of evidence-based guidance for the discontinuation of and switching between drugs targeting the CGRP pathway.

Effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for migraine in patients over 65 years: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Migraine patients over 65 years have been excluded from pivotal anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody trials leaving limited real-life data on effectiveness and safety in this population. This review aims to summarize available evidence on treatment response and safety for older patients.

METHODS

A PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) search identified studies on anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine over 65 up to October 2024. The review focuses on headache outcomes like reduction in monthly migraine days or monthly headache days, response rates (30%, 50%, 75%) and adverse effects of this specific population and/or against placebo, standard care, or younger patients. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool.

RESULTS

All eligible studies were included, along with additional articles presented narratively. Data from clinical trials and post-hoc analyses show comparable efficacy and safety between older and younger patients. Similarly, early real-life studies support the use of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in patients over 65 years, showing similar response rates, reductions in monthly migraine days and adverse effects.

DISCUSSION

Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies should likely be offered to patients over 65 although available evidence remains limited. Further studies analyzing specific data from this subgroup are necessary.

Stroke etiology and white matter burden in women with and without migraine

BACKGROUND

Women with migraine, especially with aura (MA), have a higher risk of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) and ischemic stroke. We aimed to assess differences in stroke etiology between women with and without migraine and the impact of migraine on WMH volume in women with stroke.

METHODS

We included women aged 40-60 years with a history of ischemic stroke, migraine or both. Stroke etiology was categorized using the TOAST criteria. WMH volume was measured using 3D-FLAIR images. Presence or absence of cerebellar WMH was scored. We used regression analysis to assess differences between groups, with adjustments for age, BMI, hypertension and smoking status.

RESULTS

We included 55 women with stroke, 55 with stroke and migraine, and 38 with MA. Women with stroke more often had a history of smoking than those with stroke and migraine (74% vs. 46%, p = 0.004). Stroke of undetermined origin was more common in women with both conditions than with stroke alone (49% vs. 27%, p = 0.019). Periventricular WMH volumes were higher in women with stroke with migraine than in those with MA alone (0.55mL vs. 0.42mL, B = 0.21, 95%CI = 0.01-0.41, p = 0.040). There were no differences in deep WMH volume and cerebellar WMH between groups. Importantly, the addition of migraine did not affect WMH volume in women who had experienced stroke.

CONCLUSION

Women with both stroke and migraine more often had undetermined etiology of stroke compared to women with stroke alone, and in women with stroke alone smoking was a more prevalent risk factor. Migraine did not contribute to increased WMH volume in women with stroke.

Cardiovascular Safety of Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Older Adults or Adults With Disability With Migraine

Importance

Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (anti-CGRP mAbs) offer effective migraine-specific preventive treatment. However, concerns exist about their potential cardiovascular risks due to CGRP blockade.

Objective

To compare the incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) between Medicare beneficiaries with migraine who initiated anti-CGRP-mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA in the US.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, sequential cohort study was conducted among a nationally representative population-based sample of Medicare claims from May 2018 through December 2020. Data analysis was performed from August to December 2023. This study included fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 18 years or older with migraine who initiated either anti-CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA. Beneficiaries who had a history of myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cluster headache, malignant cancer, or hospice service within a 1-year baseline period prior to treatment initiation were excluded. To minimize channeling bias from new drug introductions and time-related bias due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 5 cohorts were established, representing sequential 6-month calendar intervals based on the initial prescription or date of index anti-CGRP mAbs or onabotulinumtoxinA use.

Exposure

Anti-CGRP mAbs vs onabotulinumtoxinA.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was time to first MI or stroke. Secondary outcomes included hypertensive crisis, peripheral revascularization, and Raynaud phenomenon. The inverse probability of treatment-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare outcomes between the 2 treatment groups.

Results

Among 266 848 eligible patients with migraine, 5153 patients initiated anti-CGRP mAbs (mean [SD] age, 57.8 [14.0] years; 4308 female patients [83.6%]) and 4000 patients initiated onabotulinumtoxinA (mean [SD] age, 61.9 [13.7] years; 3353 female patients [83.8%]). Use of anti-CGRP mAbs was not associated with an increased risk of composite CVD events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.44-1.77), hypertensive crisis (aHR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.14-1.55), peripheral revascularization (aHR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.48-4.73), or Raynaud phenomenon (aHR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.45-1.24) compared with onabotulinumtoxinA. Subgroup analyses by age group and presence of established non-MI or stroke CVD showed similar findings.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, despite initial concerns regarding the cardiovascular effects of CGRP blockade, anti-CGRP mAbs were not associated with an increased risk of CVD compared with onabotulinumtoxinA among adult Medicare beneficiaries with migraine, who were predominantly older adults or individuals with disability. Future studies with longer follow-up periods and in other populations are needed to confirm these findings.

The influence of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics on the antimigraine efficacy and safety of novel anti-CGRPergic pharmacotherapies: a narrative review

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a complex disorder, and its etiology is not yet fully understood. In the last 40 years, calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has been central to the understanding of migraine pathophysiology, leading to the development of new molecules targeting the CGRPergic system. These new molecules, such as gepants and monoclonal antibodies, are effective, well-tolerated, and safe, and are approved for clinical use.

AREAS COVERED

By searching multiple electronic scientific databases, this narrative review examined: (i) the role of CGRP in migraine; and (ii) the current knowledge on the effects of CGRPergic antimigraine pharmacotherapies, including a brief analysis of their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics.

EXPERT OPINION

Current anti-CGRPergic medications, although effective, have limitations, such as side effects and lack of antimigraine efficacy in some patients. The existence of patients with medication-resistant migraine may be due to the: (i) complex migraine pathophysiology, in which several systems appear to be deregulated before, during, and after a migraine attack; and (ii) pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties of antimigraine medications. As envisioned here, although seminal studies support the notion that CGRP plays a key role in migraine headache, the dysfunction of CGRPergic transmission does not seem to be relevant in all cases.

Impact of CGRP monoclonal antibody treatment on blood pressure in patients with migraine: A systematic review and potential clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or the CGRP-receptor have revolutionized the prevention of migraine. Despite their effectiveness, worries have surfaced regarding potential unwanted cardiovascular effects linked to the vasodilation function of CGRP, suggesting a potential influence on blood pressure (BP).

METHODS

Studies were systematically retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, MEDLINE and EMBASE up to 1 May 2024. We focused on randomized controlled trials and observational cohort or case-control studies examining the impact of anti-CGRP(R)-monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) compared to control treatments on BP in patients with migraine. Two reviewers independently conducted study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 693 articles. After removing duplicates and conducting screening, 22 full-text articles were evaluated, with only four studies meeting the inclusion criteria. Among these, only one study had a low risk of bias and reported elevated BP following initiation of anti-CGRP(R)-mAb treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Although anti-CGRP(R)-mAbs offer substantial benefits for migraine prevention, the potential risk of increased BP requires attention. Despite the current limited evidence, clinicians are urged to monitor BP of migraine patients undergoing treatment with anti-CGRP(R)-mAbs and to remain aware of the increased risk of cardiovascular events in these patients.

Bimodal functions of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the brain

AIMS

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a pluripotent neuropeptide crucial for maintaining vascular homeostasis, yet its full therapeutic potential remains incompletely exploited. Within the brain, CGRP demonstrates a distinct bimodal effect, contributing to neuroprotection in ischemic conditions while inducing neuronal sensitization and inflammation in non-ischemic settings. Despite extensive research on CGRP, the absence of a definitive determinant for this observed dichotomy has limited its potential for therapeutic applications in the brain. This review examines the effects of CGRP in both physiological and pathological conditions, aiming to identify a unifying factor that could enhance its therapeutic applicability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This comprehensive literature review analyzes the molecular pathways associated with CGRP and the specific cellular responses observed in these contexts. Additionally, the review investigates the psychological implications of CGRP in relation to cerebral perfusion levels, aiming to elucidate its underlying factors.

KEY FINDINGS

Reviewing the literature reveals that, elevated levels of CGRP in non-ischemic conditions exert detrimental effects on brain function, while they confer protective effects in the context of ischemia. These encompass anti-oxidative, anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and angiogenic properties, along with behavioral normalization. Current findings indicate promising therapeutic avenues for CGRP beyond the acute phases of cerebral injury, extending to neurodegenerative and psychological disorders associated with cerebral hypoperfusion, as well as chronic recovery following acute cerebral injuries.

SIGNIFICANCE

Improved understanding of CGRP's bimodal properties, alongside advancements in CGRP delivery methodologies and brain ischemia detection technologies, paves the way for realizing its untapped potential and broad therapeutic benefits in diverse pathological conditions.

Blood pressure monitoring in elderly migraineurs starting an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody: a real-world prospective study

BACKGROUND

While monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the CGRP pathway have revolutionized migraine management due to their improved tolerance and adherence, concerns remain about their potential impact on blood pressure (BP), especially in older patients, due to CGRP-mediated vasodilation blockade. Given the growing use of these therapies in older populations, assessing their cardiovascular (CV) safety is of paramount importance.

METHODS

This multicentric observational prospective study focused on migraine sufferers aged ≥ 60 who began erenumab, galcanezumab, or fremanezumab for prevention. Baseline, three-month, and twelve-month BP measurements were collected. Changes in antihypertensive medication and "Newly or Worsened Hypertensive" patients (NWHP) were assessed.

RESULTS

Among 155 patients receiving anti-CGRP mAbs (40 Erenumab, 47 Galcanezumab, 68 Fremanezumab), 42.5% had hypertension history and 39% were on antihypertensive treatment. No significant systolic or diastolic BP changes occurred at any time point compared to baseline (all p > 0.05), with no differences between the three groups. After one year, 20/155 (12.9%) patients were considered NWHP; 11/20 had prior hypertension, and 5/11 adjusted antihypertensive therapy. Among 9/20 newly hypertensive patients, 5/9 had a single measurement above the normal threshold with no requirement for new pharmacological therapy. A higher baseline BP value was associated with increased BP (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

The study concludes that treatment with anti-CGRP mAbs over one year does not significantly affect BP in patients aged ≥ 60, nor does it increase the incidence of hypertension compared to general population trends. Nonetheless, continuous monitoring and further long-term studies are necessary to fullya scertain the cardiovascular safety of these medications in the elderly.

Differential expression of components of the CGRP-receptor family in human coronary and human middle meningeal arteries: functional implications

BACKGROUND

Different responses in human coronary arteries (HCA) and human middle meningeal arteries (HMMA) were observed for some of the novel CGRP receptor antagonists, the gepants, for inhibiting CGRP-induced relaxation. These differences could be explained by the presence of different receptor populations in the two vascular beds. Here, we aim to elucidate which receptors are involved in the relaxation to calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), adrenomedullin (AM) and adrenomedullin 2 (AM2) in HCA and HMMA.

METHODS

RNA was isolated from homogenized human arteries (23 HCAs; 12 F, 11 M, age 50 ± 3 years and 26 HMMAs; 14 F, 12 M, age 51 ± 3 years) and qPCR was performed for different receptor subunits. Additionally, relaxation responses to CGRP, AM or AM2 of the human arteries were quantified using a Mulvany myograph system, in the presence or absence of the adrenomedullin 1 receptor antagonist AM22-52 and/or olcegepant.

RESULTS

Calcitonin-like receptor (CLR) mRNA was expressed equally in both vascular beds, while calcitonin receptor (CTR) and receptor activity-modifying protein 3 (RAMP3) expression was low and could not be detected in all samples. RAMP1 expression was similar in HCA and HMMA, while RAMP2 expression was higher in HMMA. Moreover, receptor component protein (RCP) expression was higher in HMMA than in HCA. Functional experiments showed that olcegepant inhibits relaxation to all three agonists in both vascular beds. In HCA, antagonist AM22-52 did not inhibit relaxation to any of the agonists, while a trend for blocking relaxation to AM and AM2 could be observed in HMMA.

CONCLUSION

Based on the combined results from receptor subunit mRNA expression and the functional responses in both vascular tissues, relaxation of HCA is mainly mediated via the canonical CGRP receptor (CLR-RAMP1), while relaxation of HMMA can be mediated via both the canonical CGRP receptor and the adrenomedullin 1 receptor (CLR-RAMP2). Future research should investigate whether RAMP2 predominance over RAMP1 in the meningeal vasculature results in altered migraine susceptibility or in a different response to anti-migraine medication in these patients. Moreover, the exact role of RCP in CGRP receptor signalling should be elucidated in future research.

Migraine Management in Medically Complex Patients: a Narrative Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The current review aims to provide an overview of migraine treatment strategies in medically complex patients, including those with renal, liver, and cardiovascular disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

In cardiovascular disease, gepants are likely safe for acute therapy; NSAIDs, ergotamines, and triptans are not recommended. Beta-blockers, ACEi/ARBs, and verapamil have potential cardiovascular benefits in addition to migraine preventive benefit. Frovatriptan requires no dose adjustments in kidney disease or in mild to moderate liver disease. Gepants are safe acute and preventive treatment options in mild and moderate renal and hepatic disease. TCAs and valproic acid require no dose adjustments in renal disease. OnabotulinumtoxinA is likely safe in cardiac, renal, and hepatic impairment. Although CGRP monoclonal antibodies are likely safe in renal and hepatic disease, further study is needed in these conditions as well as in cardiac disease, and no dosing recommendations are available. Effective options are available for those with complex medical comorbidities. Further research is required on the safety of newer migraine-specific therapies in these complex populations.

Causality between migraine and cardiovascular disease: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

While growing evidence suggests a relationship between migraine and cardiovascular disease, the genetic evidence for a causal relationship between migraine and cardiovascular disease is still scarce. Investigating the causal association between migraine and cardiovascular disease is vital.

METHODS

We carried out a bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study including discovery samples and replication samples using publicly available genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary datasets and stringent screening instrumental variables. Four different MR techniques-Inverse variance weighted (IVW), MR ‒Egger, weighted median, and weighted mode-as well as various sensitivity analyses-Cochran's Q, IVW radial, leave-one-out (LOO), and MR-PRESSO-were utilized to investigate the causal relationship between cardiovascular disease and migraine.

RESULTS

The protective causal effects of genetically predicted migraine on coronary artery disease (OR, 0.881; 95% CI 0.790-0.982; p = 0.023) and ischemic stroke (OR, 0.912; 95% CI 0.854-0.974; p = 0.006) were detected in forward MR analysis but not in any other cardiovascular disease. Consistently, we also discovered protective causal effects of coronary atherosclerosis (OR, 0.865; 95% CI 0.797-0.940; p = 0.001) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.798; 95% CI 0.668-0.952; p = 0.012) on migraine in reverse MR analysis.

CONCLUSION

We found a potential protective effect of migraine on coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke and a potential protective effect of coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction on migraine. We emphasised epidemiological and genetic differences and the need for long-term safety monitoring of migraine medications and future research to improve cardiovascular outcomes in migraine patients.

Intracellular pathways of calcitonin gene-related peptide-induced relaxation of human coronary arteries: A key role for Gβγ subunit instead of cAMP

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a potent vasodilator. While its signalling is assumed to be mediated via increases in cAMP, this study focused on elucidating the actual intracellular signalling pathways involved in CGRP-induced relaxation of human isolated coronary arteries (HCA).

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

HCA were obtained from heart valve donors (27 M, 25 F, age 54 ± 2 years). Concentration-response curves to human α-CGRP or forskolin were constructed in HCA segments, incubated with different inhibitors of intracellular signalling pathways, and intracellular cAMP levels were measured with and without stimulation.

RESULTS

Adenylyl cyclase (AC) inhibitors SQ22536 + DDA and MDL-12330A, and PKA inhibitors Rp-8-Br-cAMPs and H89, did not inhibit CGRP-induced relaxation of HCA, nor did the guanylyl cyclase inhibitor ODQ, PKG inhibitor KT5823, EPAC1/2 inhibitor ESI09, potassium channel blockers TRAM-34 + apamin, iberiotoxin or glibenclamide, or the Gαq inhibitor YM-254890. Phosphodiesterase inhibitors induced a concentration-dependent decrease in the response to KCl but did not potentiate relaxation to CGRP. Relaxation to forskolin was not blocked by PKA or AC inhibitors, although AC inhibitors significantly inhibited the increase in cAMP. Inhibition of Gβγ subunits using gallein significantly inhibited the relaxation to CGRP in human coronary arteries.

CONCLUSION

While CGRP signalling is generally assumed to act via cAMP, the CGRP-induced vasodilation in HCA was not inhibited by targeting this intracellular signalling pathway at different levels. Instead, inhibition of Gβγ subunits did inhibit the relaxation to CGRP, suggesting a different mechanism of CGRP-induced relaxation than generally believed.

Safety considerations in the treatment with anti-CGRP(R) monoclonal antibodies in patients with migraine

Background

Anti-CGRP-(receptor-)monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP(R)-mAbs) represent a novel class of drugs for migraine treatment, but their long-term cerebrovascular and cardiovascular (CV) safety warrants further examination.

Methods

In this observational cohort study we assessed the CV safety for erenumab and fremanezumab in a real-world setting during a follow-up period of at least 1 year. Patients with hypertension or CV history were excluded. We conducted ECGs and collected clinical data at treatment initiation and thereafter every 3 months, including liver and kidney function, lipid-, electrolyte-and glucose levels.

Results

Among patients receiving erenumab (n = 101) or fremanezumab (n = 92), 3.1% (6/193) developed abnormal ECGs or CV adverse events. Of these, three (1.6%) experienced moderate to severe CV adverse events (cerebellar stroke, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, and pericarditis) and discontinued treatment. The remaining three (1.6%) developed non-threatening ECG abnormalities without physical complaints. No significant changes were observed in liver and kidney function, lipid-, electrolyte-, or glucose levels.

Discussion

We observed CV events in 1.6% of patients with 1.5-year follow-up of anti-CGRP(R)-mAbs treatment. We advise awareness regarding CV events in patients with migraine undergoing CGRP-targeted treatment, not as a confirmation of increased risk but as a proactive measure to address potential multifactorial influences.

Evaluation of the risk of hypertension in patients treated with anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in a real-life study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the rate of hypertension incoming in patients treated with monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide.

BACKGROUND

The monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin gene-related peptide are unquestionable effective in the prevention of migraine. Despite this, the development of hypertension has been detected in some patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted at the University Hospital of Modena. Patients were visited quarterly up to 1 year.

RESULTS

Globally, no significant increase in the blood pressure was detected. The 5.7% of the patients developed a significant increase in their blood pressure. In particular, patients with a pre-existing hypertension were more likely to have a significant increase in the blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

The risk of developing hypertension during a treatment with anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies seems low. Anyway, patients with a pre-existing hypertension should be cautiously monitored because they are more likely to develop hypertension.

Reporting Quality and Risk of Bias Analysis of Published RCTs Assessing Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies in Migraine Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review

Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim was to analyze the reporting quality of phase II/III RCTs involving migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, for relevant RCTs in either episodic or chronic migraine prevention. Additionally, an adapted version of the 2010 CONSORT statement checklist was utilized. The ROBvis online tool was used to document the risk of bias. Results: From the initially identified 179 articles, we finally found 31 RCTs that were eligible for evaluation. The average CONSORT compliance was 88.7% (69.7-100%), while 93.5% (N = 29) of the articles had a compliance greater than 75%. Twenty-eight CONSORT items were reported in more than 75% of the articles. The average compliance of the analyzed RCTs was 93.9% for Galcanezumab, 91.3% for Fremanezumab, followed by 85.4% for Erenumab and Eptinezumab studies. Implementation of the ROB2 tool showed some concerning "missing information" arising from the inadequate reporting. Specifically, 50% of the studies (N = 16) were categorized as having inadequate information regarding the randomization process. Conclusions: Adequate reporting quality was disclosed in the evaluated RCTs with anti-CGRP MAbs in migraine prevention. However, some methodological issues need to be highlighted to be addressed in future studies assessing the efficacy of new molecules targeting CGRP or other candidate pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology.

Cardiovascular Adverse Drug Reactions of Anti-Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies for Migraine Prevention: An Analysis from the European Spontaneous Adverse Event Reporting System

INTRODUCTION

Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP-mAbs) have recently been approved for the prevention of migraine, and their safety profile is not fully characterized.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) of anti-CGRP-mAbs through the analysis of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) collected in the EudraVigilance (EV) database, with a specific focus on cardiovascular (CV) ADRs.

METHODS

Data on ICSRs recorded between July 2018 and December 2022 in the EV database, involving one of the anti-CGRP-mAbs for migraine prevention-erenumab (ERE), galcanezumab (GMB), fremanezumab (FMB), and eptinezumab (EPT)-were included in the analysis. All ICSRs reporting at least one CV ADR, as identified within the MedDRA® System Organ Classes (SOCs) "cardiac disorders" or "vascular disorders," were selected for the analysis. The frequency of disproportionate reporting was expressed as the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI), to evaluate the frequency of reporting of CV ADRs for each anti-CGRP-mAb compared with all other monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). A case-by-case analysis was conducted paying particular attention to serious CV ADR reports, focusing on the type of seriousness, age group, sex, and concomitant drugs.

RESULTS

A total of 9441 ICSRs were recorded in the EV database from 2018 to 2022, of which more than half were related to ERE (58.9%), followed by GMB (21.4%), FMB (19.0%), and EPT (0.7%). CV ICSRs accounted for 1205 cases (12.8%), with a total of 1599 CV ADRs. The CV ICSRs were mainly related to female patients (82.6%) aged 18-64 years (73.4%). Of the reported CV ADRs, 67.5% were considered serious. Among the total number of ICSRs related to each anti-CGRP-mAb, those associated with FMB had a higher percentage of CV ADRs (n = 253; 14.1%), followed by ERE (n = 707; 12.7%), EPT (n = 8; 12.7%), and GMB (n = 237; 11.7%). A higher frequency of reporting hypertension was shown for ERE (ROR = 1.45; 95% CI = 1.14-1.85). Pallor was mainly observed with FMB (5.00; 1.68-14.89), as well as deep vein thrombosis (3.86; 1.57-9.51), hot flush (2.16; 1.43-3.25), and palpitations (1.48; 1.05-2.08). Atrial fibrillation (2.36; 1.02-5.46) and myocardial infarction (2.21; 1.37-3.58) were mostly reported for GMB.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of anti-CGRP-related CV ADRs was consistent with the information reported in the literature. However, hypertension with ERE, atrial fibrillation and myocardial infarction with GMB, as well as pallor, deep vein thrombosis, hot flush, and palpitations with FMB were not reported in the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPCs). Considering this, more post-marketing analyses are needed to improve knowledge on the CV safety profiles of anti-CGRP-mAbs, especially for the last approved medication, EPT.

Pharmacology of erenumab in human isolated coronary and meningeal arteries: Additional effect of gepants on top of a maximum effect of erenumab

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Multiple drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor have been developed for migraine treatment. Here, the effect of the monoclonal antibody erenumab on CGRP-induced vasorelaxation was investigated in human isolated blood vessels, as well as the effect of combining erenumab with the small molecule drugs, namely rimegepant, olcegepant, or sumatriptan.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Concentration-response curves to CGRP, adrenomedullin or pramlintide were constructed in human coronary artery (HCA) and human middle meningeal artery (HMMA) segments, incubated with or without erenumab and/or olcegepant. pA2 or pKb values were calculated to determine the potency of erenumab in both tissues. To study whether acutely acting antimigraine drugs exerted additional CGRP-blocking effects on top of erenumab, HCA segments were incubated with a maximally effective concentration of erenumab (3 μM), precontracted with KCl and exposed to CGRP, followed by rimegepant, olcegepant, or sumatriptan in increasing concentrations.

KEY RESULTS

Erenumab shifted the concentration-response curve to CGRP in both vascular tissues. However, in HCA, the Schild plot slope was significantly smaller than unity, whereas this was not the case in HMMA, indicating different CGRP receptor mechanisms in these tissues. In HCA, rimegepant, olcegepant and sumatriptan exerted additional effects on CGRP on top of a maximal effect of erenumab.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Gepants have additional effects on top of erenumab for CGRP-induced relaxation and could be effective in treating migraine attacks in patients already using erenumab as prophylaxis.

Neuromodulation Techniques for Headache Management

This narrative review aims to summarize evidence regarding the current utilization and future applications of neuromodulation in patients with headaches, with special attention paid to migraine and chronic cluster headache. A search was conducted in PubMed in August of 2023 to survey the current literature on neuromodulation for the treatment of headache. In total, the search yielded 1989 results, which were further filtered to include only systematic reviews published between 2022 to 2023 to capture the most up-to-date and comprehensive research on this topic. The citation lists of these articles were reviewed to find additional research on neuromodulation and supplement the results presented in this paper with primary literature. Research on the use of neuromodulation for the treatment of headache has predominantly focused on four neuromodulation techniques: peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Outcome measures reported in this article include impact on migraine and headache frequency and/or pain intensity, adverse effects of the neuromodulation technique, and associated costs, when available. We found that neuromodulation has developed utility as an alternative treatment for both chronic cluster headaches and migraines, with a reduction in frequency and intensity of headache most elucidated from the articles mentioned in this review.

Adverse event profile of CGRP monoclonal antibodies: findings from the FDA adverse event reporting database

BACKGROUND

Four CGRP Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) have been approved for migraine prophylaxis by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) since 2018. However, there are concerns about the safety of these four drugs for real-world use.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the adverse event profiles of four CGRP-mAbs with FAERS data.

METHODS

The study was based on records from the FAERS database. Only reports containing one of the active ingredients with CGRP-mAbs were included in this study. Disproportionality analyses including but not limited to reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information components (IC) were conducted to identify drug-AE associations.

RESULTS

In total, 58110 reports were identified for CGRP-mAbs. 80 overlapping signals were disproportionately reported. They affected a range of organs and systems, including the gastrointestinal and cardiovascular systems, skin, and hair. Additionally, the rare cardiovascular adverse events were significantly different among the four CGRP-mAbs.

CONCLUSION

We identified numerous shared underlying signals (overlapping signals) for CGRP-mAbs as suspected drugs in multiple systems and organs. The unlabeled common signals may indicate potential safety issues. In addition, the underlying safety signals varied among the four CGRP-mAbs, particularly in the cardiovascular system, and further studies are needed to confirm these associations and the potential clinical implications.

Crucial role for Sodium Hydrogen Exchangers in SGLT2 inhibitor-induced arterial relaxations

Introduction

Sodium dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2 or SLC5A2) inhibitors effectively lower blood glucose and are also approved treatments for heart failure independent of raised glucose. One component of the cardioprotective effect is reduced cardiac afterload but the mechanisms underlying peripheral relaxation are ill defined and variable. We speculated that SGLT2 inhibitors promoted arterial relaxation via the release of the potent vasodilator calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) from sensory nerves independent of glucose transport.

Experimental approach

The functional effects of SGLT2 inhibitors (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, ertugliflozin) and the sodium/hydrogen exchanger 1 (NHE1) blocker cariporide were determined on pre-contracted mesenteric and renal arteries from male Wistar rats using Wire-Myography. SGLT2, NHE1, CGRP and TRPV1 expression in both arteries was determined by Western blot and immunohistochemistry. Kv7.4/5/KCNE4 and TRPV1 currents were measured in the presence and absence of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin.

Results

All SGLT2 inhibitors produced a concentration dependent relaxation (1µM-100µM) of mesenteric arteries that was considerably greater than in renal arteries. Cariporide relaxed mesenteric arteries but not renal arteries. Immunohistochemistry with TRPV1 and CGRP antibodies revealed a dense innervation of sensory nerves in mesenteric arteries that was absent in renal arteries. Consistent with a greater sensory nerve component, the TRPV1 agonist capsaicin produced significantly greater relaxations in mesenteric arteries compared to renal arteries. Relaxations to dapagliflozin, empagliflozin and cariporide were attenuated by incubation with the CGRP receptor antagonist BIBN-4096, the Kv7 blocker linopirdine and the TRPV1 antagonist AMG-517 as well as by depletion of neuronal CGRP. Neither dapagliflozin nor empagliflozin directly activated heterologously expressed TRPV1 channels or Kv7 channels. Strikingly, only NHE1 colocalised with TRPV1 in sensory nerves, and cariporide pre-application prevented the relaxant response to SGLT2 inhibitors.

Conclusions

SGLT2 inhibitors relax mesenteric arteries by a novel mechanism involving the release of CGRP from sensory nerves following inhibition of the Na + /H + exchanger.

Consensus-Based Recommendations on the Use of CGRP-Based Therapies for Migraine Prevention in the UAE

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a common debilitating neurological disorder affecting a large proportion of the general population. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a 37-amino acid neuropeptide, plays a key role in the pathophysiology of migraine, and the development of therapies targeting the anti-CGRP pathway has revolutionized the field of migraine treatment.

METHODS

An expert task force of neurologists in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) developed and critically assessed recommendations on the use of CGRP-based therapies in migraine treatment and management in the UAE, based on available published literature. A consensus was reached for each statement by means of an open-voting process, based on a predefined agreement level of at least 60%.

RESULTS

The consensus recommendations advocate the need for guidelines for the appropriate use of CGRP-based therapies by defining patient cohorts and appropriate monitoring of therapeutic response as well as standardizing the initiation, assessment, and cessation of treatment. The consensus recommendations were primarily formulated on the basis of international studies, because of the limited availability of regional and local data. As such, they may also act as guidelines for global healthcare providers.

CONCLUSIONS

These are the first consensus recommendations for the UAE that address the use of CGRP-based therapies in the treatment and management of migraine, integrating both clinical evidence and medical expertise to enhance clinical judgment and decision-making.

Plasma calcitonin gene-related peptide and nerve growth factor as headache and pain biomarkers in recently deployed soldiers with and without a recent concussion

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to characterize the utility of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and nerve growth factor (NGF) as potential biomarkers for headache and pain disorders in the post-military deployment setting.

BACKGROUND

The need to improve recognition, assessment, and prognoses of individuals with posttraumatic headache or other pain has increased interest in the potential of CGRP and NGF as biomarkers.

METHODS

The Warrior Strong Study (NCT01847040) is an observational longitudinal study of United States-based soldiers who had recently returned from deployment to Afghanistan or Iraq from 2009 to 2014. The present nested cross-sectional analysis uses baseline data collected from soldiers returning to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

RESULTS

In total, 264 soldiers (mean (standard deviation [SD] age 28.1 [6.4] years, 230/264 [87.1%] men, 171/263 [65.0%] White) were analyzed. Mean (SD) plasma levels of CGRP were 1.3 (1.1) pg/mL and mean levels of NGF were 1.4 (0.4) pg/mL. Age was negatively correlated with NGF (-0.01 pg/mL per year, p = 0.007) but was not associated with CGRP. Men had higher mean (SD) CGRP plasma levels than women (1.4 95% confidence interval [CI; 1.2] vs. 0.9 95% CI [0.5] pg/mL, p < 0.002, Kruskal-Wallis test). CGRP levels were lower in participants who had a headache at the time of the blood draw (1.0 [0.6] pg/mL vs. 1.4 [1.2] pg/mL, p = 0.024). NGF was lower in participants with continuous pain (all types; 1.2 [0.4] vs. 1.4 [0.4] pg/mL, p = 0.027) and was lower in participants with traumatic brain injury (TBI) + posttraumatic headache (PTH) versus TBI without PTH (1.3 [0.3] vs. 1.4 [0.4] pg/mL, p = 0.021). Otherwise, CGRP and NGF were not associated with migraine-like headache, TBI status, or headache burden as measured by the number of medical encounters in crude or adjusted models.

CONCLUSION

In this exploratory study, plasma levels of NGF and CGRP showed promise as biomarkers for headache and other types of pain. These findings need to be replicated in other cohorts.

Migraine in older adults

Migraine is an evolving, and sometimes lifelong disorder. The prevalence of episodic migraine peaks among individuals aged in their late 30s, implying a tendency for the disorder to remit with increasing age thereafter, whereas chronic migraine is more likely to persist into later life. Diagnosis and treatment of migraine in older adults, defined as individuals aged 60 years or older, is rendered more complex by increasing probabilities of atypical clinical features and comorbidities, with patients' comorbidities sometimes limiting their therapeutic options. However, the changing clinical presentation of migraine over an individual's lifespan is not well characterised. The neurobiological basis of remission in older adults remains unclear, although vascular, neuronal, and hormonal changes are likely to be involved. Long-term longitudinal studies of individuals with migraine would be particularly informative, with the potential not only to suggest new research directions, but also to lead to the identification of novel therapeutic agents. Although several novel migraine medications are becoming available, their effectiveness, tolerability, and safety often remain uncertain in older adults, who have commonly been excluded from the evaluation of these agents in randomised controlled trials, or who constitute only a small proportion of study populations. There is a need to recognise these limitations in the available evidence, and the specific, and often unmet, clinical needs of older adults with migraine, not least because older adults constitute an increasing proportion of populations worldwide.

Cerebrovascular Fibromuscular Dysplasia - A Practical Review

Fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD) is a rare idiopathic, segmental, noninflammatory and nonatherosclerotic arteriopathy of medium-sized arteries. It is classically considered to be a disease of young and middle adulthood, with females more commonly affected than males. FMD is a systemic disease. Although historically considered to be rare, cerebrovascular FMD (C-FMD) has now been recognized to be as common as the renovascular counterpart. Extracranial carotid and vertebral arteries are the most commonly involved vascular territories in C-FMD with the clinical presentation determined by vessels affected. Common symptoms include headaches and pulsatile tinnitus, with transient ischemic attacks, ischemic stroke and subarachnoid or intracerebral hemorrhage constituting the more severe clinical manifestations. Cervical artery dissection involving carotids more often than vertebral arteries and intracranial aneurysms account for the cerebrovascular pathologies detected in C-FMD. Our understanding regarding C-FMD has been augmented in the recent past on account of dedicated C-FMD data from North American, European and other international FMD cohorts. In this review article, we provide an updated and comprehensive overview on epidemiology, clinical presentation, etiology, diagnosis and management of C-FMD.

Migraine and cardiovascular disease: what cardiologists should know

Migraine is a chronic neurovascular disease with a complex, not fully understood pathophysiology with multiple causes. People with migraine suffer from recurrent moderate to severe headache attacks varying from 4 to 72 h. The prevalence of migraine is two to three times higher in women compared with men. Importantly, it is the most disabling disease in women <50 years of age due to a high number of years lived with disability, resulting in a very high global socioeconomic burden. Robust evidence exists on the association between migraine with aura and increased incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD), in particular ischaemic stroke. People with migraine with aura have an increased risk of atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death compared with those without migraine. Ongoing studies investigate the relation between migraine and angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries and migraine patients with patent foramen ovale. Medication for the treatment of migraine can be preventative medication, such as beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, antiepileptics, antidepressants, some of the long-acting calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists, or monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide or its receptor, or acute medication, such as triptans and calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor antagonists. However, these medications might raise concerns when migraine patients also have CVD due to possible (coronary) side effects. Specifically, knowledge gaps remain for the contraindication to newer treatments for migraine. All cardiologists will encounter patients with CVD and migraine. This state-of-the-art review will outline the basic pathophysiology of migraine and the associations between migraine and CVD, discuss current therapies, and propose future directions for research.

Ten open questions in migraine prophylaxis with monoclonal antibodies blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide pathway: a narrative review

The monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) blocking the calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) pathway, collectively called here "anti-CGRP/rec mAbs", have dramatically improved preventive migraine treatment. Although their efficacy and tolerability were proven in a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and, maybe even more convincingly, in real world settings, a number of open questions remain. In this narrative review, we will analyze published data allowing insight in some of the uncertainties related to the use of anti-CGRP/rec mAbs in clinical practice: their differential efficacy in migraine subtypes, outcome predictors, switching between molecules, use in children and adolescents, long-term treatment adherence and persistence, effect persistence after discontinuation, combined treatment with botulinum toxin or gepants, added-value and cost effectiveness, effectiveness in other headache types, and potential contraindications based on known physiological effects of CGRP. While recent studies have already provided hints for some of these questions, many of them will not find reliable and definitive answers before larger studies, registries or dedicated RCTs are available.

Blocking the CGRP Receptor: Differences across Human Vascular Beds

Multiple drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor have been developed for the treatment of migraine. Here, the effect of the small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonist zavegepant (0.1 nM-1 µM) on CGRP-induced relaxation in isolated human coronary arteries (HCAs) was investigated. A Schild plot was constructed and a pA2 value was calculated to determine the potency of zavegepant. The potency and Schild plot slopes of atogepant, olcegepant, rimegepant, telcagepant, ubrogepant and zavegepant in HCAs and human middle meningeal arteries (HMMAs), obtained from our earlier studies, were compared. Zavegepant shifted the concentration-response curve to CGRP in HCAs. The corresponding Schild plot slope was not different from unity, resulting in a pA2 value of 9.92 ± 0.24. No potency difference between HCAs and HMMAs was observed. Interestingly, olcegepant, atogepant and rimegepant, with a Schild plot slope < 1 in HCAs, were all >1 log unit more potent in HMMAs than in HCAs, while telcagepant, ubrogepant and zavegepant, with a Schild plot slope not different from unity, showed similar (<1 log difference) potency across both tissues. As a Schild plot slope < 1 may point to the involvement of multiple receptors, it is important to further identify the receptors involved in the relaxation to CGRP in HCAs, which may be used to improve the cardiovascular safety of future antimigraine drugs.

The vascular role of CGRP: a systematic review of human studies

Intravenous infusion of human alpha calcitonin gene-related peptide (h-α-CGRP) has been applied to explore migraine pathogenesis and cerebral hemodynamics during the past three decades. Cumulative data implicate h-α-CGRP in regulating the vascular tone. In this systematic review, we searched PubMed and EMBASE for clinical studies investigating the vascular changes upon intravenous infusion of h-α-CGRP in humans. A total of 386 studies were screened by title and abstract. Of these, 11 studies with 61 healthy participants and 177 participants diagnosed with migraine were included. Several studies reported hemodynamic effects including flushing, palpitation, warm sensation, heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), mean blood flow velocity of middle cerebral artery (mean V_MCA), and diameter of superficial temporal artery (STA). Upon the start of h-α-CGRP infusion, 163 of 165 (99%) participants had flushing, 98 of 155 (63%) participants reported palpitation, and 160 of 165 (97%) participants reported warm sensation. HR increased with 14%-58% and MABP decreased with 7%-12%. The mean V_MCA was decreased with 9.5%-21%, and the diameter of the STA was dilated with 41%-43%. The vascular changes lasted from 20 to >120 min. Intravenous infusion of h-α-CGRP caused a universal vasodilation without any serious adverse events. The involvement of CGRP in the systemic hemodynamic raises concerns regarding long-term blockade of CGRP in migraine patients with and without cardiovascular complications.

Neurological and psychiatric comorbidities of migraine: Concepts and future perspectives

BACKGROUND

This narrative review aims to discuss several common neurological and psychiatric disorders that show comorbidity with migraine. Not only can we gain pathophysiological insights by studying these disorders, comorbidities also have important implications for treating migraine patients in clinical practice.

METHODS

A literature search on PubMed and Embase was conducted with the keywords "comorbidity", "migraine disorders", "migraine with aura", "migraine without aura", "depression", "depressive disorders", "epilepsy", "stroke", "patent foramen ovale", "sleep wake disorders", "restless legs syndrome", "genetics", "therapeutics".

RESULTS

Several common neurological and psychiatric disorders show comorbidity with migraine. Major depression and migraine show bidirectional causality and have shared genetic factors. Dysregulation of both hypothalamic and thalamic pathways have been implicated as a possibly cause. The increased risk of ischaemic stroke in migraine likely involves spreading depolarizations. Epilepsy is not only bidirectionally related to migraine, but is also co-occurring in monogenic migraine syndromes. Neuronal hyperexcitability is an important overlapping mechanism between these conditions. Hypothalamic dysfunction is suggested as the underlying mechanism for comorbidity between sleep disorders and migraine and might explain altered circadian timing in migraine.

CONCLUSION

These comorbid conditions in migraine with distinct pathophysiological mechanisms have important implications for best treatment choices and may provide clues for future approaches.

Migraine and the Gender Divide

Migraine is a global neurologic disease that is highly prevalent, especially in women. Studies have observed a predisposition for the development of migraine in women, although the mechanisms involved have yet to be fully elucidated. This review aimed to summarize the recent evidence regarding the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of migraine and highlight key sex differences. We also identify gaps in care for both women and men living with migraine and discuss the presence of migraine-related stigma and how this may impact the efficacy of clinical care.

Targeting Nociceptive Neurons and Transient Receptor Potential Channels for the Treatment of Migraine

Migraine is a neurovascular disorder that affects approximately 12% of the global population. While its exact causes are still being studied, researchers believe that nociceptive neurons in the trigeminal ganglia play a key role in the pain signals of migraine. These nociceptive neurons innervate the intracranial meninges and convey pain signals from the meninges to the thalamus. Targeting nociceptive neurons is considered promising due to their accessibility and distinct molecular profile, which includes the expression of several transient receptor potential (TRP) channels. These channels have been linked to various pain conditions, including migraine. This review discusses the role and mechanisms of nociceptive neurons in migraine, the challenges of current anti-migraine drugs, and the evidence for well-studied and emerging TRP channels, particularly TRPC4, as novel targets for migraine prevention and treatment.

Emerging drugs for the preventive treatment of migraine: a review of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and gepants trials

INTRODUCTION

Migraine is a leading cause of years lived with disability and preventive strategies represent a mainstay to reduce health-related disability and improve quality of life of migraine patients. Until a few years ago, migraine prevention was based on drugs developed for other clinical indications and relocated in the migraine therapeutic armamentarium, characterized by unfavourable tolerability profiles. The advent of monoclonal antibodies against Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) and gepants, CGRP receptor antagonists, has been a turning point in migraine prevention owing to advantageous efficacy, safety and tolerability profiles.Nevertheless, while in an ideal scenario a drug characterized by significant greater efficacy and tolerability compared to existing therapeutic strategies should be adopted as a first-line treatment, cost-effectiveness analyses available for monoclonal antibodies against CGRP pathway tend to limit their administration to more severe migraine phenotypes.

AREAS COVERED

The present narrative review aim to provide a critical appraisal of phase II and III CGRP-mAbs and gepants trials to analyse their use in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite monoclonal antibodies against CGRP pathway and gepants can be undoubtedly considered top-of-the-range treatments, there are still issues deserving to be addressed in the coming years as the risk of off-target effects as well as their economic sustainability based on the considerable migraine burden.

Safety profile of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system in pregnancy: Updated analysis in VigiBase®

BACKGROUND

Safety data on the use of migraine preventive monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system in pregnancy are limited.

METHODS

Updated pharmacovigilance assessment of the safety reports related to pregnancy associated with erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and eptinezumab, retrieved from VigiBase® as of 31 December 2021. As primary outcome, the whole group of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP system was considered and sex and age subgroup disproportionality analyses using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) were conducted.

RESULTS

286 safety reports were found: 116 (40.6%) on erenumab, 125 (43.7%) on galcanezumab, 39 (13.6%) on fremanezumab, 6 (2.1%) on eptinezumab. One hundred and forty-nine (52.1%) safety reports reported only drug exposure in relation to pregnancy while 137 (47.9%) also included ≥1 pregnancy outcomes: maternal outcomes (n = 64), spontaneous abortion (n = 63), foetal growth restriction (n = 1), prematurity (n = 8), neonatal outcomes (n = 13), and poor breastfeeding (n = 1). No specific patterns of maternal, foetal and neonatal toxicity were observed. Spontaneous abortion was not disproportionally more frequently reported with erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and eptinezumab compared with the entire database (ROR 1.1, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.8-1.5), the entire database since 2018 (ROR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.8), and triptans (ROR 1.2, 95% CI 0.8-1.9).

CONCLUSIONS

This updated safety analysis on erenumab, galcanezumab, fremanezumab and eptinezumab in pregnancy showed no signals of foeto-maternal toxicity according to VigiBase® safety reports.

CGRP physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic targets: migraine and beyond

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a neuropeptide with diverse physiological functions. Its two isoforms (α and β) are widely expressed throughout the body in sensory neurons as well as in other cell types, such as motor neurons and neuroendocrine cells. CGRP acts via at least two G protein-coupled receptors that form unusual complexes with receptor activity-modifying proteins. These are the CGRP receptor and the AMY1 receptor; in rodents, additional receptors come into play. Although CGRP is known to produce many effects, the precise molecular identity of the receptor(s) that mediates CGRP effects is seldom clear. Despite the many enigmas still in CGRP biology, therapeutics that target the CGRP axis to treat or prevent migraine are a bench-to-bedside success story. This review provides a contextual background on the regulation and sites of CGRP expression and CGRP receptor pharmacology. The physiological actions of CGRP in the nervous system are discussed, along with updates on CGRP actions in the cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, immune, hematopoietic, and reproductive systems and metabolic effects of CGRP in muscle and adipose tissues. We cover how CGRP in these systems is associated with disease states, most notably migraine. In this context, we discuss how CGRP actions in both the peripheral and central nervous systems provide a basis for therapeutic targeting of CGRP in migraine. Finally, we highlight potentially fertile ground for the development of additional therapeutics and combinatorial strategies that could be designed to modulate CGRP signaling for migraine and other diseases.

L-arginine and aged garlic extract for the prevention of migraine: a study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase-II trial (LARGE trial)

Background

Migraine is a common and distressing neurological condition characterised by recurrent throbbing headaches, nausea and heightened sensitivity to light and sound. Accumulating evidence suggests that cerebral arteries dilate during migraine, causing distal microvessels to constrict, which could activate nociceptors and cause onset of headache pain. If so, preventing or attenuating chronic microvascular constriction, and promoting a dilatory phenotype, may reduce frequency and/or severity of migraines. The primary aim of the L-Arginine and Aged Garlic Extract (LARGE) trial is to investigate whether oral treatment with dietary nutraceuticals, L-arginine and aged garlic extract (AGE), both systemic vasodilatory agents, will alleviate migraine frequency, duration and severity in adults with chronic frequent episodic migraines.

Methods

The study is a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled phase-II single-site clinical trial conducted in Perth, Australia. The target sample is to recruit 240 participants diagnosed with chronic frequent episodic migraines between 18 and 80 years of age. Participants will be randomised to one of four treatment groups for 14 weeks (placebo induction for 2 weeks, followed by 12 weeks on one of the respective treatment arms): placebo, L-arginine, AGE, or a combination of L-arginine and AGE. The doses of L-arginine and AGE are 1.5 g and 1 g daily, respectively. The primary outcome is to assess migraine response using change in migraine frequency and intensity between baseline and 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the impact of L-arginine and/or AGE on photosensitivity, retinal vessel changes, and blood biomarker concentrations of vascular tone, following a 12-week intervention.

Discussion

The protocol describes the oral administration of 2 nutraceutical-based interventions as possible prophylactic treatments for chronic frequent episodic migraines, with potential for direct clinical translation of outcomes. Potential limitations of the study include the fixed-dose design of each treatment arm and that in vivo neuroimaging methods, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), will not be conducted to determine putative cerebro-vasodilatory changes to coincide with the outcome measures. Dose-response studies may be indicated.

Trial registration

The trial was retrospectively registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12621001476820 (Universal Trial Number: U1111-1268-1117) on 04/08/2021. This is protocol version 1, submitted on 25/11/2022.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-023-03149-y.

Current and Emerging Pharmacotherapy for Menstrual Migraine: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

In this article, we discuss menstrual migraine (MM), which can be categorized as menstrually related migraine (MRM) or pure menstrual migraine (PMM). MM attacks are often longer, more severe, and harder to treat than other migraine attacks. Appropriate treatment strategies include acute treatment, short term preventive treatment, and daily preventive treatment, depending on the patient's pattern of migraine and occurrence of migraine outside the menstrual period.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Ovid search from inception to October 2022 provided articles relating to MM pathophysiology and treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

In patients for whom standard acute therapy is inadequate, short term or daily preventive treatment should be considered. Patients with PMM may be adequately managed with short term preventive treatment started 2 days prior to the onset of migraine and continued for 5-6 days. Frovatriptan is the mainstay of short-term prevention. Patients who experience additional attacks outside the menstrual period may benefit from daily preventive treatment. Estrogen-containing contraceptive treatment may be effective in appropriately selected patients. Emerging research on the pathophysiology of MM indicates that oxytocin agonists and CGRP antagonists may prove to be effective treatment options.

Calcitonin gene relating peptide inhibitors in combination for migraine treatment: A mini-review

The discovery of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its role in migraine pathophysiology has led to advances in the treatment of migraine. Since 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved four monoclonal antibody (mab) therapies targeting either the CGRP ligand or receptor and 3 oral small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists. These targeted therapies have been shown to be safe and effective for either preventive or acute treatment of migraine in adults. Given their efficacy and tolerability profile, CGRP inhibitors have revolutionized the approach to migraine treatment. Theoretically, combining therapies within this therapeutic class could lead to more CGRP blockade and, subsequently, improved patient outcomes. There are providers currently combining CGRP therapies in clinical practice. However, limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of this practice. This mini-review provides a summary of available data and poses important considerations when combining CGRP therapies for migraine treatment.

Efficacy of tDCS in chronic migraine: A multiprotocol randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Given the prevalence and complicated pathophysiology of migraine, unknown or varied mechanisms of action of available monotherapies or add-on therapies, and their broad range of adverse effects, it is imperative to manage migraine symptoms using a non-invasive, multifunctional, and alternate monotherapy with no negative impacts.

METHODS

We used a single-blind, randomized, sham-controlled design with baseline, post-test, and 24-weeks follow-up measurements to assess the efficacy of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in chronic migraine. A total of 150 participants were randomly assigned to the five groups (i.e., allocation ratio of 1:1:1:1:1). Each group received tDCS-intervention for 11 consecutive-weeks (25 sessions; each session = two consecutive montages; each montage = a 20 min duration, 2000 μA intensity).

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis of variance showed significant (p <.05) reductions in chronic migraine symptoms in the four intervention groups. Compared with the sham (η² < 0.18) and other protocols (two = η² > 0.42; three = η² > 0.40; four = η² > 0.51), protocol one [l. anode at the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortices, cathode at the left dorsomedial and superior frontal gyrus-first montage; anode at the right primary motor area, cathode at the medial crosstalk of hemispheres-second montage] showed a larger effect size (η² > 0.59) in the present trial.

CONCLUSIONS

With the applied protocols of the present trial, tDCS can be used as an effective intervention for the prophylactic and therapeutic treatment of chronic migraine. However, while the second protocol was the least effective, the first was the most effective at reducing migraine symptoms.

SIGNIFICANCE

To our knowledge, the present trial is the first study to cover the gaps of the earlier ones, including the parameters like the site of stimulation, electrode range distribution and field intensity, number of sessions, session design, and sample size.

The sense of stopping migraine prophylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Migraine prophylactic therapy has changed over recent years with the development and approval of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. As new therapies emerged, leading headache societies have been providing guidelines on the initiation and escalation of such therapies. However, there is a lack of robust evidence looking at the duration of successful prophylaxis and the effects of therapy discontinuation. In this narrative review we explore both the biological and clinical rationale for prophylactic therapy discontinuation to provide a basis for clinical decision-making.

METHODS

Three different literature search strategies were conducted for this narrative review. These include i) stopping rules in comorbidities of migraine in which overlapping preventives are prescribed, notably depression and epilepsy; ii) stopping rules of oral treatment and botox; iii) stopping rules of antibodies targeting the CGRP (receptor). Keywords were utilized in the following databases: Embase, Medline ALL, Web of Science Core collection, Cochran Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar.

DISCUSSION

Reasons to guide decision-making in stopping prophylactic migraine therapies include adverse events, efficacy failure, drug holiday following long-term administration, and patient-specific reasons. Certain guidelines contain both positive and negative stopping rules. Following withdrawal of migraine prophylaxis, migraine burden may return to pre-treatment level, remain unchanged, or lie somewhere in-between. The current suggestion to discontinue CGRP(-receptor) targeted mAbs after 6 to 12 months is based on expert opinion, as opposed to robust scientific evidence. Current guidelines advise the clinician to assess the success of CGRP(-receptor) targeted mAbs after three months. Based on excellent tolerability data and the absence of scientific data, we propose if no other reasons apply, to stop the use of mAbs when the number of migraine days decreases to four or fewer migraine days per month. There is a higher likelihood of developing side effects with oral migraine preventatives, and so we suggest stopping these drugs according to the national guidelines if they are well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Translational and basic studies are warranted to investigate the long-term effects of a preventive drug after its discontinuation, starting from what is known about the biology of migraine. In addition, observational studies and, eventually, clinical trials focusing on the effect of discontinuation of migraine prophylactic therapies, are essential to substantiate evidence-based recommendations on stopping rules for both oral preventives and CGRP(-receptor) targeted therapies in migraine.

Change of CGRP Plasma Concentrations in Migraine after Discontinuation of CGRP-(Receptor) Monoclonal Antibodies

Discontinuation of treatment with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) targeting the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) pathway leads to an increase in migraine frequency. We aimed to assess changes in free and total CGRP plasma concentrations after the discontinuation of CGRP(-receptor) mAbs. This prospective analysis included 59 patients with migraine (n = 25 erenumab, n = 25 galcanezumab, n = 9 fremanezumab) who discontinued mAbs after ≥8 months of treatment. Patients were visited at the time of the last mAb injection (V1) and 16 weeks later (V2). For control, 30 migraine patients without preventive drug therapy were included. We measured free CGRP plasma concentrations in the erenumab and fremanezumab group and total CGRP concentrations in the galcanezumab group. Free CGRP plasma concentrations did not change after treatment discontinuation [erenumab: V1 31.2 pg/mL (IQR 25.8−45.6), V2 30.3 pg/mL (IQR 22.9−47.6), p = 0.65; fremanezumab V1 29.4 pg/mL (IQR 16.4−61.9), V2 34.4 (19.2−62.0), p = 0.86]. Controls had similar CGRP values of 32.6 pg/mL (IQR 21.3−44.6). Total CGRP concentrations in the galcanezumab group were 5439.3 pg/mL (2412.7−6338.1) at V1, and decreased to 1853.2 pg/mL (1136.5−3297.0) at V2 (p < 0.001). Cessation of treatment with CGRP(-R) mAbs did not have an impact on the free-circulating CGRP concentrations. Total CGRP decreased significantly after three months of treatment discontinuation.

Global Epidemiology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis and Current Therapeutic Novelties in Migraine Therapy and their Prevention: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

The current article reviews the latest information on epidemiology, clinical features, diagnosis, recent advancements in clinical management, current therapeutic novelties, and the prevention of migraines. In a narrative review, all studies as per developed MeSH terms published until February 2023, excluding those irrelevant, were identified through a PubMed literature search.

METHODS

Overall, migraine affects more than a billion people annually and is one of the most common neurological illnesses. A wide range of comorbidities is associated with migraines, including stress and sleep disturbances. To lower the worldwide burden of migraine, comprehensive efforts are required to develop and enhance migraine treatment, which is supported by informed healthcare policy. Numerous migraine therapies have been successful, but not all patients benefit from them.

RESULTS

CGRP pathway-targeted therapy demonstrates the importance of translating mechanistic understanding into effective treatment. In this review, we discuss clinical features, diagnosis, and recently approved drugs, as well as a number of potential therapeutic targets, including pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), adenosine, opioid receptors, potassium channels, transient receptor potential ion channels (TRP), and acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC).

CONCLUSION

In addition to providing more treatment options for improved clinical care, a better understanding of these mechanisms facilitates the discovery of novel therapeutic targets.

Adverse Events Reported with Therapies Targeting the CGRP Pathway During the First 6 Months Post-launch: A Retrospective Analysis Using the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System

INTRODUCTION

Through 2018, three calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway-targeted monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) had received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for migraine prevention: erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis evaluated adverse events (AEs) spontaneously reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) safety surveillance database during the first 6 months post-approval of erenumab (May 2018 to November 2018), fremanezumab (September 2018 to March 2019), and galcanezumab (September 2018 to March 2019). Reporting rates (RR) per 1000 exposed patients were calculated from number of reported events (when product classified as "primary suspect") in each AE category and estimated number of treated patients based on de-identified prescription data (IQVIA database) and were ranked on the basis of frequency for each product.

RESULTS

RR per 1000 exposed patients for "migraine" (erenumab, 4.89; fremanezumab, 1.01; galcanezumab, 2.99), "headache" (3.32, 1.27, 3.07), and "drug ineffective" (3.68, 1.14, 1.69) were commonly reported for all three products, as were migraine-associated symptoms ("nausea": 2.94, 0.91, 1.09) and "injection-site" reactions ("pain": 2.94, 0.8, 4.9; "swelling": 0.56, 0.53, 1.25; "pruritus": 0.26, 0.63, 1.14; "erythema": 0.58, 0.71, 1.58). "Constipation" ranked second for erenumab (4.90) but did not make the top ten events for fremanezumab (0.46) or galcanezumab (0.76); cardiovascular events did not rank in the top ten AEs for any product. The frequency of serious outcomes was low, with ≤ 2% of AEs categorized as serious across the CGRP mAbs.

CONCLUSION

These results aid in supporting the safety profile of CGRP mAbs in the real-world setting and may provide clinicians and patients with additional insight when considering migraine preventive treatments.

A stated preference survey to explore patient preferences for novel preventive migraine treatments

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to explore patient preference for attributes of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors for the preventive treatment of migraine and to describe differences in treatment preferences between patients.

BACKGROUND

CGRP inhibitors are a novel class of migraine drugs specifically developed for the preventive treatment of migraine. Clinicians should understand patient preferences for CGRP inhibitors to inform and support prescribing choices.

METHODS

Patients with migraine in the US and Germany were recruited to participate in an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey, which presented hypothetical treatment choices using five attributes: mode of administration, side effects, migraine frequency, migraine severity, and consistency of treatment effectiveness. Attribute selection was informed by a literature review and semi-structured patient interviews (n = 35), and evaluated using patient cognitive debriefing interviews (n = 5).

RESULTS

Of 680 who consented to participate, 506 participants completed the survey and were included in the study (US = 257; Germany = 249). Overall, participants placed highest importance (preference weight, beta = 1.65, p < 0.001) on the treatment's ability to reduce the severity of migraine (mild vs. unchanged severity), followed by consistent treatment effectiveness (beta = 1.13, p < 0.001), and higher chance of reduced migraine frequency (beta = 1.00, p < 0.001). Participants preferred an oral tablet every other day (beta = 1.00, p < 0.001) over quarterly infusion, quarterly injections (p = 0.019), or monthly injection (p < 0.001). Preference for all treatment attributes were heterogeneous, and the subgroup analyses found that participants naïve to CGRP monoclonal antibody treatments had a stronger preference for oral therapy compared to those with such experience (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

In this DCE assessing CGRP inhibitors attributes, the main driver of patient choice was treatment effectiveness, specifically reduced migraine severity, and consistent treatment effectiveness. Further, patients exhibited an overall preference for an oral tablet every other day over injectables. Patients' experience with previous treatments informs the value they place on treatment characteristics.