In vitro effects of dental monomer exposure - Dependence on the cell culture model

Digital manufacturing techniques and the in vitro biocompatibility of acrylic-based occlusal device materials

OBJECTIVES

Material chemistry and workflow variables associated with the fabrication of dental devices may affect the biocompatibility of the dental devices. The purpose of this study was to compare digital and conventional workflow procedures in the manufacturing of acrylic-based occlusal devices by assessing the cytotoxic potential of leakage products.

METHODS

Specimens were manufactured by 3D printing (stereolithography and digital light processing), milling, and autopolymerization. Print specimens were also subjected to different post-curing methods. To assess biocompatibility, a human tongue epithelial cell line was exposed to material-based extracts. Cell viability was measured by MTT assay while Western blot assessed the expression level of selected cytoprotective proteins.

RESULTS

Extracts from the Splint 2.0 material printed with DLP technology and post-cured with the Asiga Flash showed the clearest loss of cell viability. The milled and autopolymerized materials also showed a significant reduction in cell viability. However, by storing the autopolymerized material in dH2O for 12 h, no significant viability loss was observed. Increased levels of cytoprotective proteins were seen in cells exposed to extracts from the print materials and the autopolymerized material. Similarly to the effect on viability loss, storing the autopolymerized material in dH2O for 12 h reduced this effect.

CONCLUSIONS/CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Based on the biocompatibility assessments, clinical outcomes of acrylic-based occlusal device materials may be affected by the choice of manufacturing technique and workflow procedures.

Methacrylate Ester Monomers

The Expert Panel for Cosmetic Ingredient Safety reviewed newly available studies since their original assessment in 2005, along with updated information regarding product types and concentrations of use, and confirmed that these 22 methacrylate ester monomers are safe as used in nail enhancement products in the practices of use and concentration as described in this report, when skin contact is avoided.

Biological aspects of modern dental composites

Biological evaluation of resin-based dental composites has traditionally been based on in vitro endpoint tests with different methods to determine loss of cell viability and cell morphology changes after exposure to the material or monomer constituents. The data reveals a potential for biological effects, but clinical relevance of such data is limited. Positive allergy tests and allergic clinical reactions to dental monomers are observed in dental personnel and patients. The aim of this review is to address newer research on molecular events caused by exposure to resin-based composites to have a better understanding of the potential for clinical adverse effects. A more accurate understanding of the biological aspects of dental composite materials has been found after studying parameters like glutathione depletion, oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and immunomodulatory key effects in various cell culture models. Using omics-based approaches allow for a broader and non-specified search of changes caused by methacrylate exposure. Defense mechanisms and adaption are observed in cells exposed to monomer concentrations relevant to clinical exposure. The above-mentioned methods are the foundations for modified testing strategies. The clinical relevance of most available in vitro endpoint tests is of limited relevance for the patient. Research focusing on molecular mechanisms has given new insight into methacrylate toxicity in exposed cells. Using this knowledge from mechanistic studies to develop standardized in vitro biocompatibility tests will likely improve their clinical relevance.

Synthesis of di- and triacrylamides with tertiary amine cores and their evaluation as monomers in dental adhesive interfaces

PURPOSE/AIM

In an attempt to increase the service life of dental adhesive interfaces, more hydrolytically and enzymatically-stable methacrylate alternatives, such as methacrylamides, have been proposed. The aim of this study was to investigate polymerization behavior, as well as mechanical and biological properties of experimental adhesives containing multi-functional acrylamides.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multi-functional acrylamides (N,N-Bis[(3-methylaminoacryl)propyl]methylamine - BMAAPMA, Tris[(2-methylaminoacryl)ethyl]amine - TMAAEA, N,N'-bis(acrylamido) 1,4-diazepane - BAADA, N,N-Diethyl-1,3-bis(acrylamido)propane - DEBAAP) or HEMA (2-Hydroxyethyl methacrylate - control) were added at 40 wt% to UDMA. 0.2 wt% DMPA and 0.4 wt% DPI-PF6 were used as initiators. Polymerization kinetics was followed in real-time in near-IR during photoactivation (320-500 nm, at 630 mW/cm²). Water sorption/solubility and flexural strength/modulus were measured according to ISO 4049. ¹H NMR was used to assess monomer degradation kinetics. MTT assay was used to assess cytotoxicity against OD-21 and DPSC cells. Biofilm formation and adhesion were assessed by Luciferase Assay and Impingement technique, respectively. Solvated adhesives (40 vol% ethanol) were used to test interfacial adhesion strength. The results were analyzed by ANOVA/Tukey's test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

In general, the pure methacrylate mixture had higher rate of polymerization (Rp_max), degree of conversion (DC) at Rp_max, and final DC than the acrylamides. Flexural properties after water storage decreased between 11 and 65%, more markedly for acrylamides. Interfacial bond strength was greater and more stable long-term for the newly synthesized acrylamide formulations (less than 4% reduction at 6 months) compared to the methacrylate experimental control (42% reduction at 6 months). HEMA degraded by almost 90%, while the acrylamides showed no degradation in acidic conditions. Cytotoxicity and biofilm formation, in general, were similar for all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite demonstrating high water sorption, the acrylamide-containing materials had similar mechanical and biological properties and enhanced interfacial bond strength stability compared to the methacrylate control.