1
|
Mukkamala R, Carlson DJ, Miller NK, Lindeman SD, Bowen ER, Tudi P, Schleinkofer T, Booth OC, Cox A, Srinivasarao M, Low PS. Design of a Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Radiopharmaceutical Therapy with High Tumor-to-Healthy-Tissue Ratios. J Nucl Med 2024:jnumed.124.267756. [PMID: 38871387 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Because of upregulated expression on cancer-associated fibroblasts, fibroblast activation protein (FAP) has emerged as an attractive biomarker for the imaging and therapy of solid tumors. Although many FAP ligands have already been developed for radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs), most suffer from inadequate tumor uptake, insufficient tumor residence times, or off-target accumulation in healthy tissues, suggesting a need for further improvements. Methods: A new FAP-targeted RPT with a novel ligand (FAP8-PEG3-IP-DOTA) was designed by combining the desirable features of several previous ligand-targeted RPTs. Uptake and retention of [111In]In or [177Lu]Lu-FAP8-PEG3-IP-DOTA were assessed in KB, HT29, MDA-MB-231, and 4T1 murine tumor models by radioimaging or ex vivo biodistribution analyses. Radiotherapeutic potencies and gross toxicities were also investigated by monitoring tumor growth, body weight, and tissue damage in tumor-bearing mice. Results: FAP8-PEG3-IP-DOTA exhibited high affinity (half-maximal inhibitory concentration, 1.6 nM) and good selectivity for FAP relative to its closest homologs, prolyl oligopeptidase (half-maximal inhibitory concentration, ∼14.0 nM) and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (half-maximal inhibitory concentration, ∼860 nM). SPECT/CT scans exhibited high retention in 2 different solid tumor models and minimal uptake in healthy tissues. Quantitative biodistribution analyses revealed tumor-to-healthy-tissue ratios of more than 5 times for all major organs, and live animal studies demonstrated 65%-93% suppression of tumor growth in all 4 models tested, with minimal or no evidence of systemic toxicity. Conclusion: We conclude that [177Lu]Lu-FAP8-PEG3-IP-DOTA constitutes a promising and safe RPT candidate for FAPα-targeted radionuclide therapy of solid tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramesh Mukkamala
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Daniel J Carlson
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Nicholas Kaine Miller
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Spencer D Lindeman
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Emily Renee Bowen
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Pooja Tudi
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Taylor Schleinkofer
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Owen C Booth
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Abigail Cox
- Department of Comparative Pathobiology, Purdue College of Veterinary Medicine, West Lafayette, Indiana
| | - Madduri Srinivasarao
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| | - Philip S Low
- Department of Chemistry and Institute for Drug Discovery, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana; and
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Naghavi AO, Bryant JM, Kim Y, Weygand J, Redler G, Sim AJ, Miller J, Coucoules K, Michael LT, Gloria WE, Yang G, Rosenberg SA, Ahmed K, Bui MM, Henderson-Jackson EB, Lee A, Lee CD, Gonzalez RJ, Feygelman V, Eschrich SA, Scott JG, Torres-Roca J, Latifi K, Parikh N, Costello J. Habitat escalated adaptive therapy (HEAT): a phase 2 trial utilizing radiomic habitat-directed and genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) optimization for high-grade soft tissue sarcoma. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:437. [PMID: 38594603 PMCID: PMC11003059 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12151-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), have significant inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity, with poor response to standard neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT). Achieving a favorable pathologic response (FPR ≥ 95%) from RT is associated with improved patient outcome. Genomic adjusted radiation dose (GARD), a radiation-specific metric that quantifies the expected RT treatment effect as a function of tumor dose and genomics, proposed that STS is significantly underdosed. STS have significant radiomic heterogeneity, where radiomic habitats can delineate regions of intra-tumoral hypoxia and radioresistance. We designed a novel clinical trial, Habitat Escalated Adaptive Therapy (HEAT), utilizing radiomic habitats to identify areas of radioresistance within the tumor and targeting them with GARD-optimized doses, to improve FPR in high-grade STS. METHODS Phase 2 non-randomized single-arm clinical trial includes non-metastatic, resectable high-grade STS patients. Pre-treatment multiparametric MRIs (mpMRI) delineate three distinct intra-tumoral habitats based on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) sequences. GARD estimates that simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) doses of 70 and 60 Gy in 25 fractions to the highest and intermediate radioresistant habitats, while the remaining volume receives standard 50 Gy, would lead to a > 3 fold FPR increase to 24%. Pre-treatment CT guided biopsies of each habitat along with clip placement will be performed for pathologic evaluation, future genomic studies, and response assessment. An mpMRI taken between weeks two and three of treatment will be used for biological plan adaptation to account for tumor response, in addition to an mpMRI after the completion of radiotherapy in addition to pathologic response, toxicity, radiomic response, disease control, and survival will be evaluated as secondary endpoints. Furthermore, liquid biopsy will be performed with mpMRI for future ancillary studies. DISCUSSION This is the first clinical trial to test a novel genomic-based RT dose optimization (GARD) and to utilize radiomic habitats to identify and target radioresistance regions, as a strategy to improve the outcome of RT-treated STS patients. Its success could usher in a new phase in radiation oncology, integrating genomic and radiomic insights into clinical practice and trial designs, and may reveal new radiomic and genomic biomarkers, refining personalized treatment strategies for STS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT05301283. TRIAL STATUS The trial started recruitment on March 17, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA.
| | - J M Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Youngchul Kim
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Joseph Weygand
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Applied Sciences, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Gage Redler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Austin J Sim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, James Cancer Hospital, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Justin Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Coucoules
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Lauren Taylor Michael
- Clinical Trials Office, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Warren E Gloria
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - George Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Stephen A Rosenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kamran Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Marilyn M Bui
- Department of Pathology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | - Andrew Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Caitlin D Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ricardo J Gonzalez
- Department of Sarcoma, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Steven A Eschrich
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jacob G Scott
- Translational Hematology and Oncology Research, Radiation Oncology Department, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Javier Torres-Roca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nainesh Parikh
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - James Costello
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Interventional Radiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wiltink LM, Miah AB, Scholten AN, Haas RL. Unraveling the Myth of Radiation Resistance in Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:172-179. [PMID: 38508782 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
There is a misconception that sarcomas are resistant to radiotherapy. This manuscript summarizes available (pre-) clinical data on the radiosensitivity of soft tissue sarcomas. Currently, clinical practice guidelines suggest irradiating sarcomas in 1.8-2 Gy once daily fractions. Careful observation of myxoid liposarcomas patients during preoperative radiotherapy led to the discovery of this subtype's remarkable radiosensitivity. It resulted subsequently in an international prospective clinical trial demonstrating the safety of a reduced total dose, yet still delivered with conventional 1.8-2 Gy fractions. In several areas of oncology, especially for tumors of epithelial origin where radiotherapy plays a curative role, the concurrent application of systemic compounds aiming for radiosensitization has been incorporated into routine clinical practice. This approach has also been investigated in sarcomas and is summarized in this manuscript. Observing relatively low α/β ratios after preclinical cellular investigations, investigators have explored hypofractionation with daily doses ranging from 2.85-8.0 Gy per day in prospective clinical studies, and the data are presented. Finally, we summarize work with mouse models and genomic investigations to predict observed responses to radiotherapy in sarcoma patients. Taken together, these data indicate that sarcomas are not resistant to radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Wiltink
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - A B Miah
- Department of Radiotherapy and Physics, The Royal Marsden Hospital and The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - A N Scholten
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - R L Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, The Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shanker MD, Cavazos AP, Li J, Beckham TH, Yeboa DN, Wang C, McAleer MF, Briere TM, Amini B, Tatsui CE, North RY, Alvarez-Breckenridge CA, Cezayirli PC, Rhines LD, Ghia AJ, Bishop AJ. Definitive single fraction spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic sarcoma: Simultaneous integrated boost is associated with high tumor control and low vertebral fracture risk. Radiother Oncol 2024; 193:110119. [PMID: 38311030 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Sarcoma spinal metastases (SSM) are particularly difficult to manage given their poor response rates to chemotherapy and inherent radioresistance. We evaluated outcomes in a cohort of patients with SSM uniformly treated using single-fraction simultaneous-integrated-boost (SIB) spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS). MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was conducted at a single tertiary institution treated with SSRS for SSM between April 2007-April 2023. 16-24 Gy was delivered to the GTV and 16 Gy uniformly to the CTV. Kaplan-Meier analysis was conducted to assess time to progression of disease (PD) with proportionate hazards modelling used to determine hazard ratios (HR) and respective 95 % confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS 70 patients with 100 lesions underwent SSRS for SSM. Median follow-up was 19.3 months (IQR 7.7-27.8). Median age was 55 years (IQR42-63). Median GTV and CTVs were 14.5 cm3 (IQR 5-32) and 52.7 cm3 (IQR 29.5-87.5) respectively. Median GTV prescription dose and biologically equivalent dose (BED) [α/β = 10] was 24 Gy and 81.6 Gy respectively. 85 lesions received 24 Gy to the GTV. 27 % of patients had Bilsky 1b or greater disease. 16 of 100 lesions recurred representing a crude local failure rate of 16 % with a median time to failure of 10.4 months (IQR 5.7-18) in cases which failed locally. 1-year actuarial local control (LC) was 89 %. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.3 months (IQR 7.7-25) from SSRS. Every 1 Gy increase in GTV absolute minimum dose (DMin) across the range (5.8-25 Gy) was associated with a reduced risk of local failure (HR = 0.871 [95 % CI 0.782-0.97], p = 0.009). 9 % of patients developed vertebral compression fractures at a median of 13 months post SSRS (IQR 7-25). CONCLUSION This study represents one of the most homogenously treated and the largest cohorts of patients with SSM treated with single-fraction SSRS. Despite inherent radioresistance, SSRS confers durable and high rates of local control in SSM without unexpected long-term toxicity rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mihir D Shanker
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States; The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | | | - Jing Li
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| | - Thomas H Beckham
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| | - Debra N Yeboa
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| | - Chenyang Wang
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| | | | | | - Behrang Amini
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| | - Claudio E Tatsui
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| | - Robert Y North
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| | | | | | | | - Amol J Ghia
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Centre, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bryant JM, Mills MN, Yang GQ, Liveringhouse C, Palm R, Johnstone PA, Miller JT, Latifi K, Feygelman V, Naghavi AO. Novel Definitive Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Dose-painting (HARD) for Unresected Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101447. [PMID: 38778821 PMCID: PMC11110037 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are historically radioresistant, with surgery being an integral component of their treatment. With their low α/β, STS may be more responsive to hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT), which is often limited by long-term toxicity risk to surrounding normal tissue. An isotoxic approach using a hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) regimen allows for dosing based on clinical risk while sparing adjacent organs at risk. Methods and Materials We retrospectively identified patients from 2019 to 2022 with unresected STS who received HARD with dose-painting to high, intermediate, and low-risk regions of 3.0 Gy, 2.5 Gy, and 2.0 to 2.3 Gy, respectively, in 20 to 22 fractions. Clinical endpoints included local control, locoregional control, progression free survival, overall survival, and toxicity outcomes. Results Twenty-seven consecutive patients were identified and had a median age of 68 years and tumor size of 7.0 cm (range, 1.2-21.0 cm). Tumors were most often high-grade (70%), stage IV (70%), located in the extremities (59%), and locally recurrent (52%). With a median follow-up of 33.4 months, there was a 3-year locoregional control rate of 100%. The 3-year overall and progression-free survival were 44.9% and 23.3%, respectively. There were 5 (19%) acute and 2 (7%) late grade 3 toxicities, and there were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities at any point. Conclusions The HARD regimen is a safe method of dose-escalating STS, with durable 3-year locoregional control. This approach is a promising alternative for unresected STS, though further follow-up is required to determine long-term control and toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - George Q. Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Casey Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Russell Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Peter A. Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Justin T. Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O. Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ewongwo A, Hui C, Moding EJ. Opportunity in Complexity: Harnessing Molecular Biomarkers and Liquid Biopsies for Personalized Sarcoma Care. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:195-206. [PMID: 38508784 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Due to their rarity and complexity, sarcomas represent a substantial therapeutic challenge. However, the incredible diversity within and across sarcoma subtypes presents an opportunity for personalized care to maximize efficacy and limit toxicity. A deeper understanding of the molecular alterations that drive sarcoma development and treatment response has paved the way for molecular biomarkers to shape sarcoma treatment. Genetic, transcriptomic, and protein biomarkers have become critical tools for diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment selection in patients with sarcomas. In the future, emerging biomarkers like circulating tumor DNA analysis offer the potential to improve early detection, monitoring response to treatment, and identifying mechanisms of resistance to personalize sarcoma treatment. Here, we review the current state of molecular biomarkers for sarcomas and highlight opportunities and challenges for the implementation of new technologies in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnes Ewongwo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Caressa Hui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Everett J Moding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.; Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA..
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mills M, Miller J, Liveringhouse C, Bryant JM, Kawahara Y, Feygelman V, Latifi K, Yang G, Johnstone PA, Naghavi AO. Novel Postoperative Hypofractionated Accelerated Radiation Dose-Painting Approach for Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101391. [PMID: 38495036 PMCID: PMC10943519 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hypofractionated radiation therapy (RT) offers benefits in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas (STS), including exploitation of the lower α/β, patient convenience, and cost. This study evaluates the acute toxicity of a hypofractionated accelerated RT dose-painting (HARD) approach for postoperative treatment of STS. Methods and Materials This is a retrospective review of 53 consecutive patients with STS who underwent resection followed by postoperative RT. Standard postoperative RT dosing for R0/R1/gross disease with sequential boost (50 Gy + 14/16/20 Gy in 32-35 fractions) were replaced with dose-painting, which adapts dose based on risk of disease burden, to 50.4 and 63, 64.4, 70 Gy in 28 fractions, respectively. The first 10 patients were replanned with a sequential boost RT approach and dosimetric indices were compared. Time-to-event outcomes, including local control, regional control, distant control, and overall survival, were estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results Median follow-up was 25.2 months. Most patients had high-grade (59%) STS of the extremity (63%) who underwent resection with either R1 (40%) or close (36%) margins. Four patients experienced grade 3 acute dermatitis which resolved by the 3-month follow-up visit. The 2-year local control, regional control, distant control, and overall survival were 100%, 92%, 68%, and 86%, respectively. Compared with the sequential boost plan, HARD had a significantly lower field size (total V50 Gy; P = .002), bone V50 (P = .031), and maximum skin dose (P = .008). Overall treatment time was decreased by 4 to 7 fractions, which translated to a decrease in estimated average treatment cost of $3056 (range, $2651-$4335; P < .001). Conclusions In addition to benefits in cost, convenience, and improved biologic effect in STS, HARD regimen offers a safe treatment approach with dosimetric advantages compared with conventional sequential boost, which may translate to improved long-term toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Justin Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Casey Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - John M. Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Yuki Kawahara
- University of South Florida, Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | - Vladimir Feygelman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kujtim Latifi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - George Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Peter A. Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O. Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jang JY, Kim K, Chen M, Akimoto T, Wang MLC, Kim M, Kim K, Lee TH, Yoo GS, Park HC. A meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety between proton beam therapy versus carbon ion radiotherapy. Cancer Med 2024; 13:e7023. [PMID: 38396380 PMCID: PMC10891363 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.7023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the outcomes of proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) by a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing clinical evidence. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed to identify studies comparing the clinical outcomes of PBT and CIRT. The included studies were required to report oncological outcomes (local control [LC], progression-free survival [PFS], or overall survival [OS]) or adverse events. RESULTS Eighteen articles comprising 1857 patients (947 treated with PBT and 910 treated with CIRT) were included in the analysis. The pooled analysis conducted for the overall population yielded average hazard ratios of 0.690 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.493-0.967, p = 0.031) for LC, 0.952 (95% CI, 0.604-1.500, p = 0.590) for PFS, and 1.183 (0.872-1.607, p = 0.281) for OS with reference to CIRT. The subgroup analyses included patients treated in the head and neck, areas other than the head and neck, and patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas. These analyses revealed no significant differences in most outcomes, except for LC in the subgroup of patients treated in areas other than the head and neck. Adverse event rates were comparable in both groups, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.097 (95% CI, 0.744-1.616, p = 0.641). Meta-regression analysis for possible heterogeneity did not demonstrate a significant association between treatment outcomes and the ratio of biologically effective doses between modalities. CONCLUSION This study highlighted the comparability of PBT and CIRT in terms of oncological outcomes and adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong Yun Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Kangpyo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Miao‐Fen Chen
- Department of Radiation OncologyChang Gung Memorial HospitalTaoyuanTaiwan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Division of Radiation Oncology and Particle TherapyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastChibaJapan
- Department of Radiation OncologyNational Cancer Center Hospital EastChibaJapan
| | | | - Min‐Ji Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future MedicineSamsung Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Kyunga Kim
- Biomedical Statistics Center, Research Institute for Future MedicineSamsung Medical CenterSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| | - Gyu Sang Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
- Department of Radiation OncologyChungbuk National University HospitalCheongjuRepublic of Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical CenterSungkyunkwan University School of MedicineSeoulRepublic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chang L, D'Amiano A, Bhatia R, Yenokyan G, Llosa NJ, Ladle BH, Meyer CF, Levin AS, Pratilas CA, Ladra M, Acharya S. Impact of Consolidative Radiation on Overall and Progression-Free Survival in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Metastatic Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:474-484. [PMID: 37797747 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the association between consolidative radiation (RT) and survival in children, adolescents, and young adults with metastatic sarcoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS Eligibility criteria included patients aged ≤39 years with newly diagnosed metastatic bone or soft tissue sarcoma who completed local control of the primary tumor without disease progression. Consolidative RT was defined as RT to all known sites of metastatic disease. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox provided adjusted estimates. To account for immortal time bias, consolidative RT was used as a time-varying covariate in a time dependent Cox model. Distant failure was estimated using the Fine-Gray model. RESULTS Patients (n = 85) had a median age at diagnosis of 14.8 years. Most common histology was Ewing Sarcoma (45.9%) followed by rhabdomyosarcoma (40.0%). Receipt of consolidative RT was associated with Ewing Sarcoma (P < .001) and local control modality as those who underwent local control with surgery and RT compared with surgery alone were more likely to be treated with consolidative RT (P = .034). Consolidative RT was independently associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.17-0.98; P = .045) and improved PFS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16-0.88; P = .024) after adjusting for confounding variables and immortal time bias. Patients treated with consolidative RT also experienced a lower risk of distant failure (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P = .001). In an independent data set of patients with metachronous progression (n = 36), consolidative RT remained independently associated with improved OS. CONCLUSIONS Consolidative RT was independently associated with improved OS and PFS and decreased risk of distant failure in child, adolescent, and young adult patients with metastatic sarcoma. Future work should evaluate biomarkers to optimize patient selection, timing, and dose for consolidative RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leslie Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Anjali D'Amiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rohini Bhatia
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Gayane Yenokyan
- Johns Hopkins Biostatistics Center, Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nicolas J Llosa
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brian H Ladle
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christian F Meyer
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Adam S Levin
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Christine A Pratilas
- Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Matthew Ladra
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sahaja Acharya
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Montero A, Chen-Zhao X, Ciérvide R, Álvarez B, Prado A, López M, Sánchez E, Hernando O, de la Casa MA, García-Aranda M, Valero J, Alonso R, Fernández-Letón P, Rubio C. Moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy and pathologic response for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of limbs and trunk: experience from a tertiary cancer center. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:204-213. [PMID: 37277526 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03237-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative radiation therapy following by limb-sparing or conservative surgery is a standard approach for limb and trunk STS. Data supporting hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules are scarce albeit biological sensitivity of STS to radiation would justify it. We sought to evaluate the impact of moderate hypofractionation on pathologic response and its influence on oncologic outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS From October 2018 to January 2023, 18 patients with limb or trunk STS underwent preoperative radiotherapy at a median dose of 52.5 Gy (range 49.5-60 Gy) in 15 fractions of 3.5 Gy (3.3-4 Gy) with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A favorable pathologic response (fPR) was considered as ≥ 90% tumor necrosis on specimen examination. RESULTS All patients completed planned preoperative radiotherapy. Eleven patients (61.1%) achieved a fPR, and 7 patients (36.8%) a complete pathologic response with total disappearance of tumor cells. Nine patients (47%) developed grade 1-2 acute skin toxicity, and 7 patients (38.8%) had wound complications on follow-up. With a median follow-up of 14 months (range 1-40), no cases of local relapse were observed, and actuarial 3-year overall survival (OS) and distant metastases-free survival (DMFS) are 87% and 76.4%, respectively. In the univariate analysis, the presence of a favorable pathologic response (fPR) was associated with improved 3-year OS (100% vs. 56.03%, p = 0.058) and 3-year DMFS (86.91% vs. 31.46%, p = 0.002). Moreover, both complete or partial RECIST response and radiological stabilization of the tumor lesion showed a significant association with higher rates of 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) (83% vs. 83% vs. 56%, p < 0.001) and 3-year overall survival (OS) (100% vs. 80% vs. 0, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative moderate hypofractionated radiation treatment for STS is feasible and well tolerated and associates encouraging rates of pathologic response that could have a favorable impact on final outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Xin Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Beatriz Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Alejandro Prado
- Department of Medical Physics, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Angel de la Casa
- Department of Medical Physics, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariola García-Aranda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeannette Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Rosa Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pedro Fernández-Letón
- Department of Medical Physics, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmen Rubio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal (C.I.O.C.C.), HM Hospitales, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kim E, Kim MS, Paik EK, Chang UK, Kong CB. Treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy for primary and metastatic sarcoma of the spine. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:156. [PMID: 37736735 PMCID: PMC10514933 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02346-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study evaluated the treatment outcomes of spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in sarcoma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 44 sarcoma patients and 75 spinal lesions (6 primary tumors, 69 metastatic tumors) treated with SBRT were retrospectively reviewed between 2006 and 2017. The median radiation dose was 33 Gy (range, 18-45 Gy) in 3 fractions (range, 1-5) prescribed to the 75% isodose line. RESULTS The median follow-up duration was 18.2 months. The 1-year local control was 76.4%, and patients treated with single vertebral body were identified as a favorable prognostic factor on multivariate analyses. Progression-free survival at 1 year was 31.9%, with the interval between initial diagnosis and SBRT and extent of disease at the time of treatment being significant prognostic factors. The 1-year overall survival was 80.5%, and PTV and visceral metastases were independently associated with inferior overall survival. CONCLUSION SBRT for spinal sarcoma is effective in achieving local control, particularly when treating a single vertebral level with a limited extent of disease involvement, resulting in an excellent control rate. The extent of disease at the time of SBRT is significantly correlated with survival outcomes and should be considered when treating spine sarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunji Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government - Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Paik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ung-Kyu Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang-Bae Kong
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 75, Nowon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul, 01812, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kahvecioglu A, Yuce Sari S, Yazici G. In Regard to Liveringhouse et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:284-285. [PMID: 37574240 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alper Kahvecioglu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezin Yuce Sari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
| | - Gozde Yazici
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Liveringhouse CL, Palm RF, Bryant JM, Yang GQ, Mills MN, Figura ND, Ahmed KA, Mullinax J, Gonzalez R, Johnstone PA, Naghavi AO. Neoadjuvant Simultaneous Integrated Boost Radiation Therapy Improves Clinical Outcomes for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:123-138. [PMID: 36935026 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.03.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Neoadjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with standard techniques (ST) offers a modest benefit in retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). As the high-risk region (HRR) at risk for a positive surgical margin and recurrence is posterior and away from radiosensitive organs at risk, using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) allows targeted dose escalation to the HRR while sparing these organs. We hypothesized that neoadjuvant SIB RT can improve disease control compared with ST, without increasing toxicity. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively identified patients with resectable nonmetastatic RPS from 2000 to 2021 who received neoadjuvant RT of 180 to 200 cGy/fraction to standard volumes. SIB patients received 205 to 230 cGy/fraction to the appropriate HRR. Clinical endpoints included abdominopelvic control (APC), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and acute toxicity. RESULTS With a median follow-up of 57 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-64), there were 103 patients with RPS who received either ST (n = 69) or SIB (n = 34) RT. Median standard volume dose was 5000 cGy (ST) and 4500 cGy (SIB), with a median HRR SIB dose of 5750 cGy. Liposarcomas (79% vs 53%; P = .004) and cT4 tumors (59% vs 19%; P < .001) were more common in the SIB cohort, without a significant difference in the rate of resection (82% vs 81%; P = .88) or R1 margin (53.5% vs 50%; P = .36); there were no R2 resections. SIB was associated with a significant improvement in 5-year APC (96% vs 70%; P = .046) and RFS (60.2% vs 36.3%; P = .036), with a nonsignificant OS difference (90.1% vs 67.5%; P = .164). On multivariable analysis, SIB remained a predictor for APC (hazard ratio, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.74; P = .027) and RFS (hazard ratio, 0.036; 95% CI, 0.13-0.98; P = .045). SIB showed no significant detriment in toxicity, albeit with a lower rate of overall grade 3 acute toxicity (3% vs 22%; P = .023) compared with ST. CONCLUSIONS In RPS, dose escalation with neoadjuvant SIB RT may be independently associated with improved APC and RFS, without a detriment in toxicity, compared with ST. With the addition of standard RT having only a modest benefit compared with surgery alone, our study suggests that future prospective studies evaluating for the benefit of SIB RT should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Casey L Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Russell F Palm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - John M Bryant
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - George Q Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Matthew N Mills
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Nicholas D Figura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kamran A Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - John Mullinax
- Sarcoma Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ricardo Gonzalez
- Sarcoma Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Peter A Johnstone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Liveringhouse CL, Yang GQ, Naghavi AO. In Reply to Kahvecioglu et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:285-286. [PMID: 37574241 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Casey L Liveringhouse
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - George Q Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Arash O Naghavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Roohani S, Loskutov J, Heufelder J, Ehret F, Wedeken L, Regenbrecht M, Sauer R, Zips D, Denker A, Joussen AM, Regenbrecht CRA, Kaul D. Photon and Proton irradiation in Patient-derived, Three-Dimensional Soft Tissue Sarcoma Models. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:577. [PMID: 37349697 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11013-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite their heterogeneity, the current standard preoperative radiotherapy regimen for localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma (STS) follows a one fits all approach for all STS subtypes. Sarcoma patient-derived three-dimensional cell culture models represent an innovative tool to overcome challenges in clinical research enabling reproducible subtype-specific research on STS. In this pilot study, we present our methodology and preliminary results using STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures that were exposed to different doses of photon and proton radiation. Our aim was: (i) to establish a reproducible method for irradiation of STS patient-derived 3D cell cultures and (ii) to explore the differences in tumor cell viability of two different STS subtypes exposed to increasing doses of photon and proton radiation at different time points. METHODS Two patient-derived cell cultures of untreated localized high-grade STS (an undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) and a pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLS)) were exposed to a single fraction of photon or proton irradiation using doses of 0 Gy (sham irradiation), 2 Gy, 4 Gy, 8 Gy and 16 Gy. Cell viability was measured and compared to sham irradiation at two different time points (four and eight days after irradiation). RESULTS The proportion of viable tumor cells four days after photon irradiation for UPS vs. PLS were significantly different with 85% vs. 65% (4 Gy), 80% vs. 50% (8 Gy) and 70% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Proton irradiation led to similar diverging viability curves between UPS vs. PLS four days after irradiation with 90% vs. 75% (4 Gy), 85% vs. 45% (8 Gy) and 80% vs. 35% (16 Gy). Photon and proton radiation displayed only minor differences in cell-killing properties within each cell culture (UPS and PLS). The cell-killing effect of radiation sustained at eight days after irradiation in both cell cultures. CONCLUSIONS Pronounced differences in radiosensitivity are evident among UPS and PLS 3D patient-derived sarcoma cell cultures which may reflect the clinical heterogeneity. Photon and proton radiation showed similar dose-dependent cell-killing effectiveness in both 3D cell cultures. Patient-derived 3D STS cell cultures may represent a valuable tool to enable translational studies towards individualized subtype-specific radiotherapy in patients with STS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyer Roohani
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Loskutov
- CELLphenomics GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jens Heufelder
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, BerlinProtonen am Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin, 14109, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Ophthalmology, 12200, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lena Wedeken
- CELLphenomics GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Manuela Regenbrecht
- CELLphenomics GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- ASC Oncology GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rica Sauer
- Institute of Pathology, Helios Klinikum Emil von Behring, Walterhöferstr. 11, 14165, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Denker
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie, 14109, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonia M Joussen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Ophthalmology, 12200, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christian R A Regenbrecht
- CELLphenomics GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- ASC Oncology GmbH, Robert-Rössle-Str. 10, 13125, Berlin, Germany
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Bobak K, Spałek MJ, Sokół K, Wągrodzki M, Owczarek D, Kawecka M, Puton B, Koseła-Paterczyk H, Rutkowski P, Czarnecka AM. Predictive Biomarkers of Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15112960. [PMID: 37296922 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Marginally resectable and unresectable soft tissue sarcomas (STS) remain a therapy challenge due to the lack of highly active treatment. The aim of the study was to identify a biomarker to predict the pathological response (PR) to preplanned treatment of these STSs. METHODS In the phase II clinical trial (NCT03651375), locally advanced STS patients received preoperative treatment with a combination of doxorubicin-ifosfamide chemotherapy and 5 × 5 Gy radiotherapy. PR to the treatment was classified using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group recommendations. We have chosen HIF-1α, CD163, CD68, CD34, CD105, and γH2AFX proteins, rendering different biological phenomena, for biomarker study. RESULTS Nineteen patients were enrolled and in four cases a good PR was reported. The high expression of HIF-1α before surgery showed a negative correlation with PR, which means a poor response to therapy. Furthermore, the samples after surgery had decreased expression of HIF-1α, which confirmed the correlation with PR. However, high expression of γH2AFX positively correlated with PR, which provides better PR. The high number of positive-staining TAMs and the high IMVD did not correlate with PR. CONCLUSIONS HIF1α and γH2AFX could be potential biomarkers for PR prediction after neoadjuvant treatment in STS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
- Diagnostic Hematology Department, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 00791 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Klaudia Bobak
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Mateusz J Spałek
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
- 1st Department of Radiotherapy, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kamil Sokół
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
- Diagnostic Hematology Department, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 00791 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Michał Wągrodzki
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Daria Owczarek
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Monika Kawecka
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
- Diagnostic Hematology Department, Institute of Hematology and Transfusion Medicine, 00791 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Beata Puton
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna M Czarnecka
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02781 Warsaw, Poland
- Department of Experimental Pharmacology, Mossakowski Medical Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02106 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Early outcomes of ultra-hypofractionated preoperative radiation therapy for soft tissue sarcoma followed by immediate surgical resection. Radiother Oncol 2023; 180:109439. [PMID: 36481382 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.109439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in shorter courses of radiation therapy (RT) in the management of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We report our institutional experience for patients undergoing ultra-hypofractionated preoperative RT followed by immediate resection. METHODS An IRB approved review of patients treated with preoperative 5 fraction, once daily RT followed by immediate resection (within 7 days) for STS of the extremity or trunk was conducted. The primary endpoints are major wound complications and local control (LC). Secondary endpoints include grade ≥ 2 toxicity, metastasis free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Twenty-two patients with a median age of 67 years (range 30-87) and median follow-up of 24.5 months (IQR 17.0-35.7) met eligibility criteria; 18/22 patients (81.8 %) had ≥ 1 year follow-up. Primary tumor location was lower extremity in 15 patients (68.2 %), upper extremity in 5 (22.7 %), and trunk in 2 (9.1 %). All patients received 30 Gy in 5 fractions. The median time to resection following RT was 1 day (range 0-5). The median time from biopsy to resection was 34 days (range 20-69). Local control was 100 %; in patients with localized disease, 2-year MFS and OS were 71.3 % and 76.9 %, respectively. Major wound complications occurred in 9 patients (40.9 %), with wound complications requiring reoperation occurring in 8 patients (36.4 %). Other acute and late grade ≥ 2 toxicities were seen in 0 and 4 patients (18.2 %), respectively. CONCLUSION Ultra-hypofractionated preoperative RT followed by immediate resection permits expedited completion of oncologic therapy with early results demonstrating excellent local control and acceptable toxicity. Prospective data with long-term follow-up is needed.
Collapse
|
18
|
Gutkin PM, Gore E, Charlson J, Neilson JC, Johnstone C, King DM, Hackbarth DA, Wooldridge A, Mannem R, Bedi M. Stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic sarcoma to the lung: adding to the arsenal of local therapy. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:42. [PMID: 36859309 PMCID: PMC9976442 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02226-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Conventional treatment of pulmonary metastatic sarcoma primarily involves surgery, with systemic therapy added in select patients. However, broader applications of radiation therapy techniques have prompted investigation into the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for treatment of metastatic sarcoma, an attractive non-invasive intervention with potential for lower rates of adverse events than surgery. Current data are limited to retrospective analyses. This study analyzed 2-year local control and overall survival and adverse events in patients prospectively treated with SBRT to pulmonary sarcoma metastases. METHODS Patients prospectively treated with SBRT to the lung for biopsy-proven metastatic sarcoma at a single institution from 2010 to 2022 were included. SBRT dose/fractionation treatment regimens ranged from 34 to 54 Gy in 1-10 fractions using photons. Local recurrence, local progression-free survival (LPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the end of SBRT. Univariable analysis (UVA) was performed using the log-rank test. Multivariable analysis (MVA) was performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Adverse events due to SBRT were graded based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS Eighteen patients with metastatic sarcoma were treated to 26 pulmonary metastases. The median local progression-free survival was not met. The median overall survival was not met. The local control rate at 2 years was 96%. 2-year LPFS was 95.5% and OS was 74%. Three patients (16.7%) developed grade 1 adverse events from SBRT. There were no adverse events attributed to radiation that were grade 2 or higher. CONCLUSION We report prospective data demonstrating that SBRT for sarcoma pulmonary metastases affords a high rate of local control and low toxicity, consistent with prior sarcoma SBRT retrospective data. This study adds to the wealth of information on SBRT in a radioresistant tumor. Though largely limited to retrospective reviews, current data indicate high rates of local control with favorable toxicity profiles. Therefore, SBRT for pulmonary sarcoma metastases may be considered for properly selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paulina M. Gutkin
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 West Doyne Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
| | - Elizabeth Gore
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 West Doyne Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
| | - John Charlson
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Medical Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI USA
| | - John C. Neilson
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI USA
| | - Candice Johnstone
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 West Doyne Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
| | - David M. King
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI USA
| | - Donald A. Hackbarth
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI USA
| | - Adam Wooldridge
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI USA
| | - Rajeev Mannem
- grid.30760.320000 0001 2111 8460Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI USA
| | - Meena Bedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8800 West Doyne Ave, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Predicting tumour radiosensitivity to deliver precision radiotherapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:83-98. [PMID: 36477705 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-022-00709-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Owing to advances in radiotherapy, the physical properties of radiation can be optimized to enable individualized treatment; however, optimization is rarely based on biological properties and, therefore, treatments are generally planned with the assumption that all tumours respond similarly to radiation. Radiation affects multiple cellular pathways, including DNA damage, hypoxia, proliferation, stem cell phenotype and immune response. In this Review, we summarize the effect of these pathways on tumour responses to radiotherapy and the current state of research on genomic classifiers designed to exploit these variations to inform treatment decisions. We also discuss whether advances in genomics have generated evidence that could be practice changing and whether advances in genomics are now ready to be used to guide the delivery of radiotherapy alone or in combination.
Collapse
|
20
|
Gurusamy VM, Al-Hammadi N, Caparrotti P, Divakar SR, Hammoud RW, Shaikh G. Real-world clinical outcomes with daily image-guided IMRT in extremity soft tissue sarcomas. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2022; 33:100655. [PMID: 36356354 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2022.100655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We report the clinical outcomes of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS) arising in extremities treated with image-guided intensity modulated radiotherapy (IG-IMRT) at our institute. Local control of the tumors treated with RT was the primary end point of this study. Analyzing overall survival and long-term toxicities were the secondary objectives. METHODS AND MATERIALS The database of the patients with STS who received wide local excision and IG-IMRT at our institution from January 2012 to December 2020 was reviewed. Radiation was offered either preoperatively or postoperatively as part of multi-modality treatment. RESULTS Thirty-three consecutive patients were identified and included for analysis. Twenty-eight patients (84.8%) received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Dedicated MRI simulation studies were performed in 31 patients (93.9%) in the treatment position. RapidArc IMRT technique was used in 31 patients (93.9%). A total of 2954 images were acquired during 991 treatment sessions. Errors exceeding 1 mm in the x, y and z directions were corrected online before the treatment. With a median follow-up of 36 months, two patients (6.1%) developed local recurrence. The 3-year local control was 90.9% (95% CI, 0.76 - 0.98), and the 5-year overall survival was 71.7% (95% CI, 0.44 - 0.88). One patient (3.03%) sustained a pathological fracture during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION Our results showed that IMRT with daily imaging offered excellent local control with acceptable long-term toxicity, as well as being feasible and practical to implement in our routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkada Manickam Gurusamy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR), Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
| | - Noora Al-Hammadi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR), Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Palmira Caparrotti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR), Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Saju Raveendran Divakar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR), Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Rabih Wafiq Hammoud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR), Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| | - Ghazia Shaikh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Center for Cancer Care and Research (NCCCR), Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for an unusual case of large brain metastases from Ewing's sarcoma in a paediatric patient. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100979. [PMID: 35814851 PMCID: PMC9260128 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
22
|
Blomain ES, Moding EJ. Liquid Biopsies for Molecular Biology-Based Radiotherapy. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:11267. [PMID: 34681925 PMCID: PMC8538046 DOI: 10.3390/ijms222011267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Molecular alterations drive cancer initiation and evolution during development and in response to therapy. Radiotherapy is one of the most commonly employed cancer treatment modalities, but radiobiologic approaches for personalizing therapy based on tumor biology and individual risks remain to be defined. In recent years, analysis of circulating nucleic acids has emerged as a non-invasive approach to leverage tumor molecular abnormalities as biomarkers of prognosis and treatment response. Here, we evaluate the roles of circulating tumor DNA and related analyses as powerful tools for precision radiotherapy. We highlight emerging work advancing liquid biopsies beyond biomarker studies into translational research investigating tumor clonal evolution and acquired resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik S. Blomain
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
| | - Everett J. Moding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA;
- Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|