Afamitresgene autoleucel for advanced synovial sarcoma and myxoid round cell liposarcoma (SPEARHEAD-1): an international, open-label, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel) showed acceptable safety and promising efficacy in a phase 1 trial (NCT03132922). The aim of this study was to further evaluate the efficacy of afami-cel for the treatment of patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing advanced synovial sarcoma or myxoid round cell liposarcoma.

METHODS

SPEARHEAD-1 was an open-label, non-randomised, phase 2 trial done across 23 sites in Canada, the USA, and Europe. The trial included three cohorts, of which the main investigational cohort (cohort 1) is reported here. Cohort 1 included patients with HLA-A*02, aged 16-75 years, with metastatic or unresectable synovial sarcoma or myxoid round cell liposarcoma (confirmed by cytogenetics) expressing MAGE-A4, and who had received at least one previous line of anthracycline-containing or ifosfamide-containing chemotherapy. Patients received a single intravenous dose of afami-cel (transduced dose range 1·0 × 109-10·0 × 109 T cells) after lymphodepletion. The primary endpoint was overall response rate in cohort 1, assessed by a masked independent review committee using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1) in the modified intention-to-treat population (all patients who received afami-cel). Adverse events, including those of special interest (cytokine release syndrome, prolonged cytopenia, and neurotoxicity), were monitored and are reported for the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04044768; recruitment is closed and follow-up is ongoing for cohorts 1 and 2, and recruitment is open for cohort 3.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 17, 2019, and July 27, 2021, 52 patients with cytogenetically confirmed synovial sarcoma (n=44) and myxoid round cell liposarcoma (n=8) were enrolled and received afami-cel in cohort 1. Patients were heavily pre-treated (median three [IQR two to four] previous lines of systemic therapy). Median follow-up time was 32·6 months (IQR 29·4-36·1). Overall response rate was 37% (19 of 52; 95% CI 24-51) overall, 39% (17 of 44; 24-55) for patients with synovial sarcoma, and 25% (two of eight; 3-65) for patients with myxoid round cell liposarcoma. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 37 (71%) of 52 of patients (one grade 3 event). Cytopenias were the most common grade 3 or worse adverse events (lymphopenia in 50 [96%], neutropenia 44 [85%], leukopenia 42 [81%] of 52 patients). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Afami-cel treatment resulted in durable responses in heavily pre-treated patients with HLA-A*02 and MAGE-A4-expressing synovial sarcoma. This study shows that T-cell receptor therapy can be used to effectively target solid tumours and provides rationale to expand this approach to other solid malignancies.

FUNDING

Adaptimmune.

Ripretinib versus sunitinib in gastrointestinal stromal tumor: ctDNA biomarker analysis of the phase 3 INTRIGUE trial

INTRIGUE was an open-label, phase 3 study in adult patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib and who were randomized to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or sunitinib 50 mg. In the primary analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) with ripretinib was not superior to sunitinib. In clinical and nonclinical studies, ripretinib and sunitinib have demonstrated differential activity based on the exon location of KIT mutations. Therefore, we hypothesized that mutational analysis using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) might provide further insight. In this exploratory analysis (N = 362), baseline peripheral whole blood was analyzed by a 74-gene ctDNA next-generation sequencing-based assay. ctDNA was detected in 280/362 (77%) samples with KIT mutations in 213/362 patients (59%). Imatinib-resistant mutations were found in the KIT ATP-binding pocket (exons 13/14) and activation loop (exons 17/18). Mutational subgroup assessment showed 2 mutually exclusive populations with differential treatment effects. Patients with only KIT exon 11 + 13/14 mutations (ripretinib, n = 21; sunitinib, n = 20) had better PFS with sunitinib versus ripretinib (median, 15.0 versus 4.0 months). Patients with only KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations (ripretinib, n = 27; sunitinib, n = 25) had better PFS with ripretinib versus sunitinib (median, 14.2 versus 1.5 months). The results of this exploratory analysis suggest ctDNA sequencing may improve the prediction of the efficacy of single-drug therapies and support further evaluation of ripretinib in patients with KIT exon 11 + 17/18 mutations. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03673501.

Patient-reported outcomes and tolerability in patients receiving ripretinib versus sunitinib after treatment with imatinib in INTRIGUE, a phase 3, open-label study

PURPOSE

In the INTRIGUE trial, ripretinib showed no significant difference versus sunitinib in progression-free survival for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) previously treated with imatinib. We compared the impact of these treatments on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomised 1:1 to once-daily ripretinib 150 mg or once-daily sunitinib 50 mg (4 weeks on/2 weeks off). Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire for Cancer-30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaire at day (D)1, and D29 of all cycles until treatment discontinuation. Change from baseline was calculated. Time without symptoms or toxicity (TWiST) was estimated as the mean number of days without progression, death, or grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events per patient over 1 year of follow-up.

RESULTS

Questionnaire completion at baseline was 88.1% (199/226) for ripretinib and 87.7% (199/227) for sunitinib and remained high for enrolled patients throughout treatment. Patients receiving sunitinib demonstrated within-cycle variation in self-reported HRQoL, corresponding to the on/off dosing regimen. Patients receiving ripretinib reported better HRQoL at D29 assessments than patients receiving sunitinib on all scales except constipation. HRQoL was similar between treatments at D1 assessments, following 2 weeks without treatment for sunitinib patients. TWiST was greater for ripretinib patients (173 versus 126 days).

CONCLUSION

Patients receiving ripretinib experienced better HRQoL than patients receiving sunitinib during the dosing period and similar HRQoL to patients who had not received sunitinib for 2 weeks for all QLQ-C30 domains except constipation. Ripretinib may provide clinically meaningful benefit to patients with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib.

Autologous T cell therapy for MAGE-A4+ solid cancers in HLA-A*02+ patients: a phase 1 trial

Affinity-optimized T cell receptors can enhance the potency of adoptive T cell therapy. Afamitresgene autoleucel (afami-cel) is a human leukocyte antigen-restricted autologous T cell therapy targeting melanoma-associated antigen A4 (MAGE-A4), a cancer/testis antigen expressed at varying levels in multiple solid tumors. We conducted a multicenter, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic solid tumors expressing MAGE-A4, including synovial sarcoma (SS), ovarian cancer and head and neck cancer ( NCT03132922 ). The primary endpoint was safety, and the secondary efficacy endpoints included overall response rate (ORR) and duration of response. All patients (N = 38, nine tumor types) experienced Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicities; 55% of patients (90% Grade ≤2) experienced cytokine release syndrome. ORR (all partial response) was 24% (9/38), 7/16 (44%) for SS and 2/22 (9%) for all other cancers. Median duration of response was 25.6 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI): 12.286, not reached) and 28.1 weeks (95% CI: 12.286, not reached) overall and for SS, respectively. Exploratory analyses showed that afami-cel infiltrates tumors, has an interferon-γ-driven mechanism of action and triggers adaptive immune responses. In addition, afami-cel has an acceptable benefit-risk profile, with early and durable responses, especially in patients with metastatic SS. Although the small trial size limits conclusions that can be drawn, the results warrant further testing in larger studies.

Primary efficacy and safety of letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel; GSK3377794) pilot study in patients with advanced and metastatic myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS)

11500

Background: Lete-cel is an autologous T-cell therapy targeting NY-ESO-1 tumors using a genetically modified, high-affinity T-cell receptor. MRCLS is a sarcoma with poor response to current immunotherapy approaches and limited treatment options. The cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1 is expressed in 80‒90% of MRCLS tumors, making this a promising target. This report summaries the primary efficacy and safety results of a pilot study of lete-cel in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic MRCLS. Methods: This is an open label, study of lete-cel in pts with advanced or metastatic MRCLS following reduced-dose (Cohort 1 [C1]; 30 mg/m2 fludarabine [flu] x 3d + 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide [cy] x 3d) or standard dose (Cohort 2 [C2]; 30 mg/m2 flu x 4d + 900 mg/m2 cy x 3d) lymphodepletion (LD). Key eligibility criteria were: age ≥18 y; HLA-A*02:01; A*02:05, or A*02:06; advanced or metastatic NY-ESO-1+ MRCLS (≥30% of cells 2+/3+ by IHC); prior anthracycline treatment, and measurable disease. The transduced T cell dose range was 1– 8 × 109. Response was assessed at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, then every 3 months (mo) until disease progression, death, or withdrawal. Investigator-assessed (IA) ORR by RECIST v1.1 was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included safety, independently assessed ORR by RECIST v1.1, time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS). Overall survival (OS) was an exploratory endpoint. Results: 23 pts enrolled from March 2017 to February 2020. The median age was 47.0 yrs (range 33 to 72). 20 pts were dosed with T cells, 10 in each cohort with a median transduced T cell dose of 4.6 x 109. 8 of 20 pts (40%) had 1 line of prior therapy, 6 pts (30%) had 2 lines, and 6 pts (30%) had ≥3 lines. The median follow-up was 5.6 (C1) and 12.9 (C2) mo. In C1 the IA ORR was 20%, with best response (BR) of partial response (PR) in 2 pts and BR of stable disease (SD) in 8 pts. The median TTR was 1.9 mo, median DOR was 5.3 mo (95% CI: 1.9-8.7), and median PFS was 5.4 mo (95% CI: 2.0-11.5). In C2 the IA ORR was 40%, with BR of PR in 4 pts and BR of SD in 5 pts. The median TTR was 1.9 mo, median DOR was 7.5 mo (95% CI: 6.0-NE), and median PFS was 8.7mo (95% CI: 0.9-NE). OS is not yet mature. All pts experienced at least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). 55% of pts experienced serious TEAEs. 90% of pts had Gr ≥3 TE neutropenia, with 83% probability of resolution of initial Gr ≥3 occurrence by Day 30. Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 80% of pts, of which 25% were Gr 3, with 1st onset within 5d of infusion and median duration 7.5d. No Graft-vs-host disease, immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, Guillain-Barré Syndrome were reported. Conclusions: Treatment with a single dose of lete-cel showed anti-tumor activity, including response and long median PFS with an acceptable safety profile in pts with advanced and metastatic MRCLS. Clinical trial information: NCT02992743.

391 Biomarker correlates of response in patients with advanced myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS) treated with NY-ESO-1 TCR T cells (Letetresgene autoleucel)

Background

This is an open label pilot study (NCT02992743) on letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel; GSK3377794), an NY-ESO-1-specific autologous CD4+ and CD8+ T cells expressing a high affinity T-cell receptor which recognizes the NY-ESO-1 antigen epitope in complex with specific HLA- alleles A*02, which exhibited anti-tumor activity and manageable safety profiles in patients with advanced MRCLS based on interim analysis (IA) data.1 Lymphodepletion has been shown to enhance the expansion, persistence, and homing of therapeutically infused T-cells, thereby potentiating therapeutic efficacy against malignant diseases.2 Initial T-cell kinetics data from this study demonstrated that lymphodepletion regimen (LDR)-B robustly depleted lymphocytes at infusion and was trended with higher peak cell expansion (Cmax) vs. LDR-A. The peak expansion was significantly associated with weight-normalized transduced cell dose and trended with response.1 Here, we will be discussing additional cell kinetics data and other exploratory biomarker correlates of response.

Methods

Patients with advanced MRCLS were enrolled to 2 cohorts and received either planned A (N=10) or B (N=10) LDRs prior to lete-cel infusion (table 1). Response was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Transduced cell kinetics were measured by quantitative PCR of transgene vector copies in DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). Serum cytokines (Meso Scale Discovery immunoassay) as pharmacodynamic (PD) markers of response and their association with T cell kinetics will be discussed. Phenotypic characterization of the cell product (pre- and post- infusion) via Flow cytometry using Cytek Aurora (23 color panel), to help understand correlation of response with engineered cell product attributes, will be presented. Potential biomarker correlates of clinical response were tested using generalized linear models.

Results

Five out of 6 responders with available lab data exhibited robust lymphocyte depletion at infusion (0–25 cell/µL) and high Cmax (>50,000 vector copies/µg gDNA) with LDR. Only 6/14 non-responders exhibited low lymphocytes counts at infusion and high Cmax. LDR-B also induced strong depletion of monocytes at infusion (p=0.03) vs. LDR-A, but depletion of monocytes did not show association with response. Higher Cmax was correlated with exposure (AUC0–28d) (Adj. R2=0.606). AUC0–28d was a better predictor of response in patients receiving LDR-B (p=0.0182), with AUC0–28d trending towards predicting response in the LDR-A cohort. AUC0–28d was associated with tumor volume reduction (p=0.0569).

Abstract 391 Table 1

Conclusions

Exposure–response analysis of this study reveals that efficacy appears to be driven by weight-normalized transduced cell dose and LDR via AUC0–28d. Higher AUC0–28d was correlated with Cmax and maximum tumor volume reduction.

Acknowledgements

This study (208469; NCT02992743) was funded by GlaxoSmithKline.

Trial Registration

NCT02992743

References

D’Angelo SP, et al. J Clin Oncol 2021;39:15_suppl:11521.

Bechman, Maher. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021;21(5):627–637.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by institutional review boards (IRB) at the six participating sites.

Abstract CT111: Results of a phase 1 dose escalation study of ERY974, an anti-glypican 3 (GPC3)/CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background: ERY974, a bispecific T cell-redirecting antibody, redirects T cells to tumor cells by engaging the CD3 antigen on T cells and the glypican 3 (GPC3) antigen selectively expressed on tumors. ERY974 demonstrates T cell-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in vitro and transient cytokine elevations in preclinical toxicology studies (Ishiguro et al. 2017). The primary objective of this dose escalation (DE) study was to determine ERY974's maximum tolerated dose in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors expressing GPC3. Methods: The study included adult patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors not amenable to standard therapy, histologically confirmed, with measurable disease and a life expectancy ≥ 3 months, including patients with ≤ 1cm and ≤ 1 brain metastasis. Patients with interstitial lung disease, or acute/active chronic infection were excluded. ERY974 was administered IV and dosed weekly. DE was initiated with an accelerated titration design of single patient cohorts followed by three patient cohorts. To mitigate for the toxicity of cytokine release syndrome (CRS), steroid prophylaxis and a flexible study design was implemented which included a two-step intra-patient escalation (regimen A), and a three-step intra-patient escalation (regimen B). Results: 29 patients were enrolled in dose levels ranging from 0.003 μg/kg to 0.81 μg/kg. Treatment-related adverse events that occurred in greater than 20% of patients included CRS and pyrexia. Dose level 0.81 μg/kg (regimen A) was confirmed not tolerable due to DLTs of Grade 3 CRS and Grade 2 CRS in two out of three patients (assessed according to Lee, et al. 2014). The Grade 3 CRS was associated with Grade 3 transaminitis and a Grade 3 elevation of bilirubin. Both CRS events led to dose delay and dose reduction. Increases in IL-6, IL-8 and IL-10 were observed in patients with the CRS. The severity and frequency of CRS in regimen B were similar to those observed in regimen A at the same dose level. One partial response (per modified RECIST criteria) was observed in a patient with esophageal cancer treated with 0.54 μg/kg (regimen B) and having 40% of the tumor tissue staining positive for GPC3 via immunohistochemistry. Stable disease lasting 3 months or longer was observed in four patients. Conclusions: The observed responses and CRS side effects are markers of ERY974 biologic activity. At doses below 0.81 μg/kg (regimen A), ERY974 was generally well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile, including ERY-induced CRS which was manageable with steroid administration and anti-IL6R therapy. Further research is required to determine if combined prophylactic anti-IL6R and steroid therapy is a more effective strategy for managing CRS. References: 1. Ishiguro, Takahiro, et al. Science translational medicine, 2017, 9.410: eaal4291. 2. Lee, Daniel W., et al. Blood, 2014, 124.2: 188-195.

Citation Format: Howard Safran, Mihaela Druta, Michael Morse, Filipa Lynce, Sofya Pintova, Khaldoun Almhanna, Daniel Weiss, Athos Gianella-Borradori, Yoshitaka Ogita, Roland Morley, Mikiko Nakamura, Junnosuke Matsushima, Takahiro Ishiguro. Results of a phase 1 dose escalation study of ERY974, an anti-glypican 3 (GPC3)/CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT111.

Safety and efficacy of letetresgene autoleucel (lete-cel; GSK3377794) in advanced myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS) following high lymphodepletion (Cohort 2): Interim analysis

11521

Background: Cancer testis antigen NY-ESO-1 is expressed in multiple tumor types, including 80‒90% of MRCLS [1,2]. Overall response rates (ORRs) to MRCLS treatment are low (1L, <20%; 2L, <10%) [2]. Lete-cel, an autologous T-cell therapy, targets NY-ESO-1/LAGE-1a+ tumors using a genetically modified, high-affinity T-cell receptor. High-dose lymphodepletion (LD) was linked with better responses in synovial sarcoma [3]; the current study tested this hypothesis in MRCLS. Methods: This open label, pilot study evaluates lete-cel efficacy and safety in advanced MRCLS following low-dose (Cohort 1 [C1]; 30 mg/m2 fludarabine [flu] x 3d + 600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide [cy] x 3d) or high-dose (Cohort 2 [C2]; 30 mg/m2 flu x 4d + 900 mg/m2 cy x 3d; initiated based on C1 data) LD. Key eligibility: age ≥18 y; HLA-A*02:01; A*02:05, or A*02:06; advanced high-grade NY-ESO-1+ MRCLS (≥30% of cells 2+/3+ by IHC); prior anthracycline; measurable disease; specified washouts; and active/chronic/intercurrent illness restrictions. Stages include screening, leukapheresis, lete-cel manufacture, LD, lete-cel infusion (1– 8 × 109 transduced T cells), follow-up. Response is assessed at wk 4, 8, 12, and 24, then every 3 mo to disease progression/death/withdrawal. The primary efficacy endpoint is investigator-assessed ORR by RECIST v1.1. In C1 (n=10 patients [pts]), lete-cel was well tolerated and linked with 2 confirmed partial responses (PR; ORR, 20%) and stable disease (SD) in 8 pts. Planned interim analysis for C2, shown here, was done once all 10 treated pts had ≥3 post-baseline disease assessments or progressed/died/withdrew. Efficacy data will be correlated with transduced cell kinetics and pharmacodynamics marker profiles. Results: Durable (1.0–7.8 mo) PR (4/10 pts [ORR, 40%]; 2 ongoing) and prolonged (2.7–10.6 mo) SD (5/10 pts; 3 ongoing) with tumor regression were observed. Treatment-emergent cytopenias occurred in all pts. All experienced T-cell related cytokine release syndrome (5 serious adverse events; 30% Grade 3), with onset ≤5d of infusion and median duration 7.5d. Graft-vs-host disease, immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, pancytopenia, or aplastic anemia were not reported. Conclusions: A single lete-cel infusion after high LD showed antitumor activity in advanced MRCLS and a manageable safety profile consistent with other lete-cel studies. The trial is active but no longer recruiting (NCT02992743). MRCLS is included in a separate, ongoing lete-cel study (NCT03967223). References: 1. D’Angelo SP, et al. J Clin Oncol 2018;36:15_suppl, 3005. 2. Pollack SM, et al. Cancer Med 2020;9(13):4593–602. 3. D’Angelo SP, et al. J Immunother Cancer 2020;8:P298. Funding: GSK (208469; NCT02992743). Editorial support was provided by Eithne Maguire, PhD, of Fishawack Indicia, part of Fishawack Health, and funded by GSK. Clinical trial information: NCT02992743.

Pexidartinib Long-Term Hepatic Safety Profile in Patients with Tenosynovial Giant Cell Tumors

Background

Pexidartinib is approved in the U.S. for tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCTs). Herein, we assessed the hepatic safety profile of pexidartinib across patients with TGCTs receiving pexidartinib.

Materials, and Methods

Hepatic adverse reactions (ARs) were assessed by type and magnitude of liver test abnormalities, classified as (a) isolated aminotransferase elevations (alanine [ALT] or aspartate [AST], without significant alkaline phosphatase [ALP] or bilirubin elevations), or (b) mixed or cholestatic hepatotoxicity (increase in ALP with or without ALT/AST and bilirubin elevations, based on adjudication). Median follow‐up from initial pexidartinib treatment was 39 months (range, 32–82) in 140 patients with TGCTs across clinical studies NCT01004861, NCT02371369, NCT02734433, and NCT03291288.

Results

In total, 95% of patients with TGCTs (133/140) treated with pexidartinib (median duration of exposure, 19 months [range, 1–76]), experienced a hepatic AR. A total of 128 patients (91%) had reversible, low‐grade dose‐dependent isolated AST/ALT elevations without significant ALP elevations. Five patients (4%) experienced serious mixed or cholestatic injury. No case met Hy's law criteria. Onset of hepatic ARs was predominantly in the first 2 months. All five serious hepatic AR cases recovered 1–7 months following pexidartinib discontinuation. Five patients from the non‐TGCT population (N = 658) experienced serious hepatic ARs, two irreversible cases.

Conclusion

This pooled analysis provides information to help form the basis for the treating physician's risk assessment for patients with TCGTs, a locally aggressive but typically nonmetastatic tumor. In particular, long‐term treatment with pexidartinib has a predictable effect on hepatic aminotransferases and unpredictable risk of serious cholestatic or mixed liver injury.

Implications for Practice

This is the first long‐term pooled analysis to report on the long‐term hepatic safety of pexidartinib in patients with tenosynovial giant cell tumors associated with severe morbidity or functional limitations and not amenable to improvement with surgery. These findings extend beyond what has been previously published, describing the observed instances of hepatic toxicity following pexidartinib treatment across the clinical development program. This information is highly relevant for medical oncologists and orthopedic oncologists and provides guidance for its proper use for appropriate patients within the Pexidartinib Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Safety program.

Pexidartinib is approved in the U.S. for treatment of tenosynovial giant cell tumors (TGCT). This article assesses the hepatic safety profile of pexidartinib in TGCT cases and describes risk mitigation procedures designed to identify any instances of serious liver injury as early as possible to better inform prescribers and patients about this drug.

A Phase 1b Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of CMB305, a Lentiviral-Based Prime-Boost Vaccine Regimen, in Patients with Locally Advanced, Relapsed, or Metastatic Cancer Expressing NY-ESO-1

Preclinical data suggest that a "prime-boost" vaccine regimen using a target-expressing lentiviral vector for priming, followed by a recombinant protein boost, may be effective against cancer; however, this strategy has not been evaluated in a clinical setting. CMB305 is a prime-boost vaccine designed to induce a broad anti-NY-ESO-1 immune response. It is composed of LV305, which is an NY-ESO-1 expressing lentiviral vector, and G305, a recombinant adjuvanted NY-ESO-1 protein. This multicenter phase 1b, first-in-human trial evaluated CMB305 in patients with NY-ESO-1 expressing solid tumors. Safety was examined in a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design, followed by an expansion with CMB305 alone or in a combination with either oral metronomic cyclophosphamide or intratumoral injections of a toll-like receptor agonist (glucopyranosyl lipid A). Of the 79 patients who enrolled, 81.0% had sarcomas, 86.1% had metastatic disease, and 57.0% had progressive disease at study entry. The most common adverse events were fatigue (34.2%), nausea (26.6%), and injection-site pain (24.1%). In patients with soft tissue sarcomas, a disease control rate of 61.9% and an overall survival of 26.2 months (95% CI, 22.1-NA) were observed. CMB305 induced anti-NY-ESO-1 antibody and T-cell responses in 62.9% and 47.4% of patients, respectively. This is the first trial to test a prime-boost vaccine regimen in patients with advanced cancer. This approach is feasible, can be delivered safely, and with evidence of immune response as well as suggestion of clinical benefit.

Liver-directed treatments of liver-dominant metastatic leiomyosarcoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of liver-directed therapies in patients with unresectable metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the liver. Liver-directed therapies included in this study were transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin eluting beads (DEB-TACE), yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization, and percutaneous microwave ablation.

METHODS

This is a single institution retrospective study of unresectable metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the liver treated with DEB-TACE, radioembolization, or microwave ablation. DEB-TACE was performed using 70-150 or 100-300 µ doxorubicin-loaded drug-eluting LC beads. Radioembolization was performed using Y90 glass microspheres. Electronic medical records were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate clinical and biochemical toxicities, tumor response on imaging, overall survival (OS), and liver progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the liver who underwent liver-directed treatment were identified (8 males, 16 females; average age, 62.8±11.4 years). Of these patients, 13 underwent DEB-TACE, 6 underwent Y90, and 5 underwent ablation. Three patients received a combination of treatments: one received Y90 followed by DEB-TACE, one received ablation followed by DEB-TACE, and one received ablation followed by Y90. Of the 24 patients, 19 received prior chemotherapy. At 3-month follow-up, grade 1 or 2 lab toxicities were found in 20 patients; 3 patients had grade 3 toxicities. A grade 3 clinical toxicity was reported in one patient. MELD score was 7.5±1.89 at baseline and 8.8±4.2 at 3 months. Median OS was 59 months (95% CI, 39.8-78.2) from diagnosis, 27 months (95% CI, 22.9-31.0) from development of liver metastasis, and 9 months (95% CI, 0-21.4) from first liver-directed treatment. Median liver PFS was 9 months (95% CI, 1.4-16.6).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with liver-directed therapies for patients with unresectable metastatic leiomyosarcoma to the liver is safe and can improve overall survival, with OS after liver-directed therapy being similar to patients who underwent surgical resection.

Chemotherapy improves distant control in localized high-grade soft tissue sarcoma of the extremity/trunk

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare and heterogeneous tumors making chemotherapy use controversial. Our goal was to identify a subset of patients with primary STS that benefit with the addition of chemotherapy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review included intermediate to high-grade localized primary STS of the extremity/trunk, and tumor size > 5 cm. The effect of chemotherapy was evaluated for local control (LC), distant control (DC), progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Results

In this cohort (n = 273), patients were treated with surgery (98%), radiation (81%), and chemotherapy (24.5%). With a median follow-up of 51 months, the entire cohort’s 5-year LC, DC, PFS, and OS are 79.1%, 59.9%, 43.8%, and 68.7%, respectively. The addition of chemotherapy did not provide a DC benefit (p = 0.238) for the entire cohort. High-grade disease (n = 210) experienced a 5-year benefit in DC (68% vs. 54.4%, p = 0.04), which was more pronounced with MAI (Mesna, Adriamycin, Ifosfamide) based regimens (74.2%, p = 0.016), and a 5-year PFS (50.8% vs 45%, p = 0.025) and OS benefit (76.2% vs 70%, p = 0.067) vs. no chemotherapy. On multivariate analysis of the high-grade subset, chemotherapy independently predicted for a DC benefit (HR 0.48 95% CI 0.26–89, p = 0.019). The benefit of chemotherapy was more pronounced with MAI, showing a significant benefit in DC (HR 0.333 95% CI 0.145–0.767, p = 0.01) and PFS (HR 0.52 95% CI 0.28–0.99, p = 0.047).

Conclusion

In patients with localized STS > 5 cm, the high-grade subset had a distant control benefit with the addition of chemotherapy, leading to improved progression free survival. This is more pronounced with the use of MAI and should be considered in patients eligible for this regimen.

Adrenal crisis and death following transarterial chemoembolization of sarcoma liver metastases

Adrenal crisis is a life-threatening complication of adrenal insufficiency which is triggered by physiological stressors such as injury, infection or a surgical procedure when the plasma concentration of adrenal corticosteroids is insufficient for physiological requirements. It is associated with a high mortality rate unless early diagnosis and treatment is initiated. We report a case of a patient with metastatic sarcoma and adrenal insufficiency who underwent right hepatic artery chemoembolization to control his intrahepatic metastases. He did not receive stress dose glucocorticoid and his glucocorticoid supplement medication was accidentally discontinued after embolization. He died due to an unrecognized adrenal crisis 2 days after embolization. This case suggests that embolization should be recognized as a stressor to prompt the need to continue chronic replacement of corticosteroids and to consider supplemental stress-dose corticosteroids. There is a growing population of patients on chronic corticosteroids for various conditions who may require tumor embolization. Therefore, it is important to consider adrenal crisis in post-embolization settings since the symptoms are non-specific and mortality can be avoided only if the diagnosis of adrenal crisis is considered and parenteral glucocorticoids administered.

SPEARHEAD-1: A phase II trial of ADP-A2M4 SPEAR T cells in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma

TPS11569

Background: ADP-A2M4 specific peptide enhanced affinity receptor (SPEAR) T-cells are genetically engineered to target MAGE-A4+ tumors in the context of HLA-A*02. MAGE-A4 has been described as having high expression in synovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCLS) [1, 2]. This Phase 2 trial was initiated based on the favorable benefit:risk profile of ADP-A2M4 observed in a Phase 1 trial (NCT03132922) of ADP-A2M4 which demonstrated compelling clinical responses in patients with SS. Methods: This Phase 2, open-label trial (SPEARHEAD-1; NCT04044768) is designed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of ADP-A2M4 in patients with advanced/metastatic SS or MRCLS who are HLA-A*02 positive and whose tumors express the MAGE-A4 protein. Enrolled patients are to undergo apheresis, and their isolated T-cells are then transduced with the MAGE-A4c1032 TCR, and expanded. Prior to ADP-A2M4 infusion, patients are to receive lymphodepleting chemotherapy consisting of fludarabine (30 mg/m2/day x 4 days) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2/day x 3 days). Patients are to receive 1 – 10 × 109 transduced T-cells. An independent Data Safety Monitoring Board will review ongoing safety and benefit:risk during the interventional phase of the study. Disease will be assessed by independent review per RECIST v1.1 by CT/MRI at weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, and every 2 months thereafter until confirmed disease progression. As of 24 Jan 2020, there were 17 clinical sites open in the US, one in Canada, and two in Spain. References: 1. Iura K, et al. Cancer-testis antigen expression in synovial sarcoma: NY-ESO-1, PRAME, MAGEA4, and MAGEA1. Human Pathology 2017; 61:130-139. 2. Iura K, et al. MAGEA4 expression in bone and soft tissue tumors: its utility as a target for immunotherapy and diagnostic marker combined with NY-ESO-1. Virchows Archiv 2017;471:383–392. Clinical trial information: NCT04044768 .

Clinical outcomes of patients with advanced synovial sarcoma or myxoid/round cell liposarcoma treated at major cancer centers in the United States

BACKGROUND

Outcomes data regarding advanced synovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCL) are limited, consisting primarily of retrospective series and post hoc analyses of clinical trials.

METHODS

In this multi-center retrospective study, data were abstracted from the medical records of 350 patients from nine sarcoma centers throughout the United States and combined into a registry. Patients with advanced/unresectable or metastatic SS (n = 249) or MRCL (n = 101) who received first-line systemic anticancer therapy and had records of tumor imaging were included. Overall survival (OS), time to next treatment, time to distant metastasis, and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression.

RESULTS

At start of first-line systemic anticancer therapy, 92.4% of patients with SS and 91.1% of patients with MRCL had metastatic lesions. However, 74.7% of patients with SS and 72.3% of patients with MRCL had ≥2 lines of systemic therapy. Median OS and median PFS from first-line therapy for SS was 24.7 months (95% CI, 20.9-29.4) and 7.5 months, respectively (95% CI, 6.4-8.4). Median OS and median PFS from start of first-line therapy for MRCL was 29.9 months (95% CI, 27-44.6) and 8.9 months (95% CI 4.5-12.0).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective study of patients with SS and MRCL. It provides an analysis of real-world clinical outcomes among patients treated at major sarcoma cancer centers and could inform treatment decisions and design of clinical trials. In general, the survival outcomes for this selected population appear more favorable than in published literature.

Case of pembrolizumab-induced myocarditis presenting as torsades de pointes with safe re-challenge

Introduction

Pembrolizumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting the programmed death receptor with clinical effect on multiple malignancies including sarcoma. Associated cardio-toxicities include myocarditis, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and arrhythmias. Although in most cases of immune checkpoint inhibitor cardiotoxicity the offending agent is discontinued, we report a case of successful and safe re-challenge with a checkpoint inhibitor in a patient with mild myocarditis.

Case report

We describe a 37-year-old female with alveolar soft part sarcoma, metastatic to the lungs on cycle 13 of pembrolizumab who presented with dyspnea, cough, and vague chest discomfort. Telemetry showed bigeminal bradycardia that transitioned to self-terminating torsades de pointes. Cardiac MRI showed subtle patchy T2 signal increase within the left ventricular septum without late gadolinium uptake, suggesting mild focal myocarditis. Management and outcome: The patient was started on a steroid taper without additional arrhythmias. We have re-challenged the patient who safely tolerated re-challenge with pembrolizumab despite an episode of torsades de pointes and documented myocarditis. She continues to receive pembrolizumab at seven months after the initial event without further cardiovascular events.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of successful re-challenge of pembrolizumab after an episode of myocarditis. In patients with mild myocarditis and no evidence of left ventricular dysfunction, re-challenge may be a viable option. However, close monitoring for the development of heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or serious arrhythmias is necessary to ensure patient safety.

Clinical, pathological, and genomic features of EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion sarcoma

Molecular diagnostics of sarcoma subtypes commonly involve the identification of characteristic oncogenic fusions. EWSR1-PATZ1 is a rare fusion partnering in sarcoma, with few cases reported in the literature. In the current study, a series of 11 cases of EWSR1-PATZ1 fusion positive malignancies are described. EWSR1-PATZ1-related sarcomas occur across a wide age range and have a strong predilection for chest wall primary site. Secondary driver mutations in cell-cycle genes, and in particular CDKN2A (71%), are common in EWSR1-PATZ1 sarcomas in this series. In a subset of cases, an extended clinical and histopathological review was performed, as was confirmation and characterization of the fusion breakpoint revealing a novel intronic pseudoexon sequence insertion. Unified by a shared gene fusion, EWSR1-PATZ1 sarcomas otherwise appear to exhibit divergent morphology, a polyphenotypic immunoprofile, and variable clinical behavior posing challenges for precise classification.

Systemic and local immunity following adoptive transfer of NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells in synovial sarcoma

Background

Gene-modified autologous T cells expressing NY-ESO-1^c259, an affinity-enhanced T-cell receptor (TCR) reactive against the NY-ESO-1-specific HLA-A*02-restricted peptide SLLMWITQC (NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cells; GSK 794), have demonstrated clinical activity in patients with advanced synovial sarcoma (SS). The factors contributing to gene-modified T-cell expansion and the changes within the tumor microenvironment (TME) following T-cell infusion remain unclear. These studies address the immunological mechanisms of response and resistance in patients with SS treated with NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cells.

Methods

Four cohorts were included to evaluate antigen expression and preconditioning on efficacy. Clinical responses were assessed by RECIST v1.1. Engineered T-cell persistence was determined by qPCR. Serum cytokines were evaluated by immunoassay. Transcriptomic analyses and immunohistochemistry were performed on tumor biopsies from patients before and after T-cell infusion. Gene-modified T-cells were detected within the TME via an RNAish assay.

Results

Responses across cohorts were affected by preconditioning and intra-tumoral NY-ESO-1 expression. Of the 42 patients reported (data cut-off 4June2018), 1 patient had a complete response, 14 patients had partial responses, 24 patients had stable disease, and 3 patients had progressive disease. The magnitude of gene-modified T-cell expansion shortly after infusion was associated with response in patients with high intra-tumoral NY-ESO-1 expression. Patients receiving a fludarabine-containing conditioning regimen experienced increases in serum IL-7 and IL-15. Prior to infusion, the TME exhibited minimal leukocyte infiltration; CD163⁺ tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) were the dominant population. Modest increases in intra-tumoral leukocytes (≤5%) were observed in a subset of subjects at approximately 8 weeks. Beyond 8 weeks post infusion, the TME was minimally infiltrated with a TAM-dominant leukocyte infiltrate. Tumor-associated antigens and antigen presentation did not significantly change within the tumor post-T-cell infusion. Finally, NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells trafficked to the TME and maintained cytotoxicity in a subset of patients.

Conclusions

Our studies elucidate some factors that underpin response and resistance to NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T-cell therapy. From these data, we conclude that a lymphodepletion regimen containing high doses of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is necessary for SPEAR T-cell persistence and efficacy. Furthermore, these data demonstrate that non-T-cell inflamed tumors, which are resistant to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, can be treated with adoptive T-cell based immunotherapy.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01343043, Registered 27 April 2011.

Clinical outcomes from a retrospective registry of patients with locally advanced/metastatic synovial sarcoma and myxoid round cell liposarcoma

e22520

Background: Outcomes of patients (pts) with advanced synovial sarcoma (SS) and myxoid/round cell sarcoma (MRCL) is lacking. Current data is limited to single institution studies or post hoc analyses of clinical trials. To understand the natural history of these subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma we performed a systematic analysis of SS and MRCL patients from large medical institutions. Methods: Data was abstracted at 7 U.S. centers for pts treated from 2005 to 2015. Advanced SS or MRCL were eligible if they had received chemotherapy and were 18 years or older. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and secondary endpoints were progression free survival, time to next treatment, time to new distant metastasis. Results: 350 pts with locally advanced (LA), unresectable and/or or metastatic (Met) SS (n = 249) and MRCL (n = 101) were analyzed. The median age at diagnosis was 40 years for SS pts (58.2% male). The median age of MRCL pts was 50 years (67.3% male). 249 SS pts all had ≥ 1line of therapy, 74.7% had ≥2 lines of treatment. All MRCL pts received ≥1 line of treatment, 72.3% had ≥2 lines. The clinical outcomes (median overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), time to next treatment (TTNT) and time to distant metastasis (TTDM)) from start of first-line chemotherapy are: The OS and PFS from second line chemotherapy decreased for all evaluable pts (n = 259) was 17.9 months (mos) [95% confidence interval (CI) (15.0, 22.3)]; 3.9 mos (3.4, 4.8), respectively. A similar trend toward shortened OS and PFS were seen with each subsequent line of chemotherapy. Conclusions: This registry analyzing real-world clinical outcomes among advanced SS and MRCL pts is the most comprehensive performed to date. It provides data on clinical outcomes depending on line of therapy and can provide the backbone for better patient management and design of future clinical trials.[Table: see text]

Abstract A002: Autologous Tcells transduced with the affinity enhanced NY-ESO-1c259TCR in patients with synovial sarcoma expressing low levels of the NY-ESO-1 antigen

Background: NY-ESO-1c259 is an affinity optimized TCR recognizing an NY-ESO-1-derived peptide complexed with HLA-A*02 (SPEAR T-cells). NY-ESO-1c259TCR therapy induced responses in ~50% of patients whose tumors express high level NY-ESO-1 (NCT01343043). Here we report on preclinical studies of TCR activity and results from a cohort of patients whose tumors express low NY-ESO-1 levels. Methods: T-cell response against tumor-derived cell lines with differential NY-ESO-1 expression levels was assessed by ELISA. Patients had selected HLA subtypes (HLA-A*02:01, 02:05, 02:06) and advanced NY-ESO-1+ SS. In this cohort, tumors express NY-ESO-1 at ≥ 1+ in &gt; 1% but &lt; 2+ or 3+ in ≥ 50% cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Following apheresis, T-cells are isolated, activated, transduced to express NY-ESO-1c259T and expanded. Lymphodepletion is with fludarabine 30 mg/m2/d × 4d and cyclophosphamide 1800 mg/m2/d × 2d. Target dose is 1–6 × 10e9 transduced cells. Disease is assessed at weeks 4, 8 and 12 and then every 3 months until disease progression. Results: NY-ESO-1c259T-cells produce IFNγ responses across a spectrum of NY-ESO-1 expressing tumor cell lines. A threshold for activation was observed at ~1×10e4 mRNA copies/10e6 reference gene transcripts. The IHC clinical trial assay was tested in FFPE tumor-derived cell lines, and staining was observed in cell lines expressing &gt;1×10e4 mRNA copies/10e6 reference gene transcripts. Ten patients in this cohort have been treated (as of 23Nov17). One died due to disease progression 2 days post infusion. Four have had a partial response (ORR 40%), and median duration of response was 8.5 weeks (range, 8-13). Antigen expression level by IHC (% 1+, 2+, and/or 3+), best overall response (BOR) by RECIST v1.1, and transduced cell expansion (copies/microgram DNA) are listed below for the 9 evaluable patients: Pt 264, 30% 1+/2+, PR, 86320; Pt 313, 90% 1+, PR, 45430; Pt 325, 10% 2+, PR, 13365; Pt 331, 40% 1+, 10% 2+, 10% 3+, PR, 197546; Pt 324, 50% 1+, 10% 2+, SD, 133334; Pt 305, 5% 1+, 5% 2+, 5% 3+, SD, 74855; Pt 322, 50% 1+, 10% 2+, SD, 54569; Pt 323, 20% 1+, 10% 2+, SD, 50912; Pt 211, 10% 1+, 20% 2+, 20% 3+, PD, 22627. Conclusions: In vitro assays can assess mRNA levels and protein expression of target antigen required for T-cell activation and cytotoxicity, predicting expression levels required for anti-tumor activity in vivo. The patient data suggest that affinity optimized TCRs can be used to treat tumors with low target antigen expression.

Citation Format: Dejka Araujo, Sandra D'Angelo, George Demetri, Mihaela Druta, John Glod, Warren Chow, William Tap, Joana Senra, Rachel Abbott, Erin Van Winkle, Karen Chagin, Miguel Maroto, Elliot Norry, Malini Iyengar, Trupti Trivedi, Andrew Gerry, Rafael Amado, Crystal Mackall. Autologous Tcells transduced with the affinity enhanced NY-ESO-1c259TCR in patients with synovial sarcoma expressing low levels of the NY-ESO-1 antigen [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Fourth CRI-CIMT-EATI-AACR International Cancer Immunotherapy Conference: Translating Science into Survival; Sept 30-Oct 3, 2018; New York, NY. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2019;7(2 Suppl):Abstract nr A002.

Clinical Utility of Genomic Profiling in the Treatment of Advanced Sarcomas: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

Sarcomas are a diverse group of malignant tumors that arise from soft tissues or bone. For most advanced cases, there is a substantial need for improved therapeutic options and, therefore, a desire to more precisely tailor therapy in individual cases. In this study, we review our institutional experience with next-generation sequencing (NGS)–based molecular profiling for non–GI stromal tumors sarcomas, with a focus on the clinical utility of the results.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed results of NGS performed on tumors from 114 patients with a diagnosis of sarcoma. A chart review was conducted to review the clinical impact of NGS findings.

Results

A median of three putatively oncogenic gene alterations were identified per tumor sample (range, 0 to 19) and at least one mutation was detected in 96.7% of tumors. Fifty-six patients (49.1%) harbored a finding that was felt to be actionable after review by a molecular tumor board. Five patients (4.4%) had a diagnosis change as a result of NGS findings. In 15 patients (13.2%), therapeutic selection was influenced by NGS findings. Four of 15 (26.7%) of the NGS-influenced systemic therapies resulted in clinical benefit.

Conclusion

Putatively oncogenic mutations are readily detected in the majority of sarcomas. Genetic profiling affected the diagnosis and/or treatment approach in a sizeable minority of patients with sarcoma treated at our center. Additional study is required to determine if genetic profiling leads to improved clinical outcomes.

A pilot study of NY-ESO-1c259 T cells in subjects with advanced myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (NCT02992743)

TPS3097

Background: Myxoid/round cell liposarcomas (MRCLS) account for 6-10% of soft tissue sarcomas. Although a chemosensitive tumor, metastatic MRCLS has a poor prognosis and is inevitably fatal. More effective, durable and less toxic therapies are needed. NY-ESO-1 is a cancer/testis antigen that is expressed in 80-90% of MRCLS tumors. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of genetically engineered affinity enhanced autologous NY-ESO-1c259T cells recognizing an NY-ESO-1 derived peptide complexed with HLA-A*02 in MRCLS. Methods: This open label phase I/II non-randomized pilot study will evaluate efficacy (overall response rate by RECIST v1.1, time to response, duration of response, progression free survival, overall survival), safety, and translational research endpoints. Patients must meet these criteria: ≥ 18 yrs old; HLA-A*02:01, *02:05 or *02:06 positive; have advanced (metastatic or inoperable) MRCLS expressing NY-ESO-1 at 2+/3+ intensity in ≥30% of tumor cells by IHC; measurable disease; prior systemic anthracycline therapy; have ECOG status 0 or 1; and adequate organ function. Initially, ten patients are planned to be enrolled, with potential to enroll an additional 5 patients. Patients who do not receive the minimum cell dose or who do not receive the T-cell infusion may be replaced. Following apheresis, the T cells are isolated and expanded with CD3/CD28 beads, transduced with a lentiviral vector containing the NY-ESO-1c259 TCR, and 1– 8 × 109 transduced T-cells are infused intravenously on Day 1 after lymphodepletion with fludarabine 30 mg/m2/day and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2/day on days -7 to -5. Response is assessed at 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks, and then every 3 months until confirmation of progression of disease. On study tumor biopsies and blood samples will be evaluated to compare the pre- and post-T cell infusion immune profile for association with treatment outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT02992743.

Immune response, safety, and survival impact from CMB305 in NY-ESO-1+ recurrent soft tissue sarcomas (STS)

11006

Background: CMB305 is an active immunotherapy regimen designed to generate and expand anti-NY-ESO-1 T cells. It consists of LV305, a dendritic cell targeting lentiviral vector encoding NY-ESO-1, and a boost with G305, an NY-ESO-1 recombinant protein plus GLA-SE, a TLR-4 agonist. An LV305 phase 1 study demonstrated a 1-yr survival of 81% and induction of anti-NY-ESO-1 T cells in sarcoma patients (pts). This first-in-human study of CMB305 examined safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in pts with NY-ESO-1 positive (+) solid tumors. Methods: Adults with previously treated NY-ESO-1+ sarcomas, NSCLC, ovarian cancer were enrolled in a 3+3 dose-escalation with an expansion phase 1 study. The CMB305 regimen included 4 intradermal injections of LV305 at 109 or 1010 vector genomes, alternating with 3 intramuscular G305 injections at 250 µg for 3 months, then bimonthly G305 injections up to 1 yr. Results: As of 31Dec2016, 25 pts with STS (15 synovial (SS), 8 myxoid/round cell liposarcoma (MRCL), 2 other) were evaluable for safety; 23 SS/MRCL pts were evaluable for immune response (IR) and efficacy. All SS and MRCL pts received prior therapy for locally advanced/metastatic disease, 67% > = 2 prior chemo regimens. No DLTs were observed; treatment related AEs were grade 1 and 2, except 1 pt with grade 3 SAE (prostatic pain). Of 11 SS/MRCL pts tested, 64% pts developed NY-ESO-1 specific T cells and 72% pts anti-NY-ESO-1 antibodies. T cell receptor sequencing indicated increased clonality, and antigen spreading after CMB305. Best response by immune related response criteria was stable disease in 8/15 (53%) SS pts and 6/8 (75%) MRCL pts. The 3 month PFS rate was 74% and 75% for SS and MRCL pts. Median survival has not been reached with 1-yr survival rate of 86% and 100% for SS and MRCL pts. Conclusions: CMB305 is safe, well tolerated, and demonstrates a survival rate that is favorable when compared with approved agents for recurrent STS. CMB305 resulted in a stronger and broader integrated IR than LV305, including antigen spreading. These data warrant further investigation of CMB305 as a monotherapy in a randomized clinical study in STS. A randomized study of CMB305 in combination with atezolizumab in SS/MRCL pts is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02387125.

Open label, non-randomized, multi-cohort pilot study of genetically engineered NY-ESO-1 specific NY-ESO-1c259t in HLA-A2+ patients with synovial sarcoma (NCT01343043)

3000

Background: NY-ESO-1 is expressed in ~70% of synovial sarcomas (SS). NY-ESO-1c259T cells recognizing an NY-ESO-1 derived peptide complexed with HLA-A*02 are being studied in SS. Methods: Eligible patients (pt) are HLA-A*02:01, 02:05 or 02:06, with unresectable, metastatic or recurrent SS expressing NY-ESO-1. Primary endpoint of ORR (CR+PR) is evaluated in high (≥ 50% tumor cells express 2+/3+) and low (≥ 1+ in ≥ 1% cells, not exceeding 2+/3+ in ≥ 50% cells) NY-ESO-1 expressers with different lymphodepleting regimens. Secondary endpoints are safety, DOR, PFS, OS, and gene-marked cell persistence. Lymphocytes are obtained by leukapheresis, isolated, activated, transduced to express NY-ESO-1c259T, and expanded. Target dose is 1–6 × 109cells. Disease is assessed at wk 4, 8 and 12 post-T-cell infusion, and then every 3 months. Results: 34 pt have been enrolled with 24 treated. 50% are male; median age is 30 yr (range 15 – 73). 12/15 pt in cohort 1 were treated. ORR was 50% (1 CR; 5 PR). Time to response was 6 wk (range 4-9) and median DOR 31 wk (range 13-72). Cohort 3 was closed due to only 1 PR out of 5 pt. Evaluation is ongoing in cohorts 2 (6 enrolled; 5 treated) and 4 (8 enrolled; 2 treated) as of 1/9/17. The most common AE are leukopenia (96%), nausea and pyrexia (88%), neutropenia (88%), lymphopenia (83%), anemia (79%), and thrombocytopenia (79%). 11 events of CRS were reported (3 G3; 1 G4), with no events of seizure, cerebral edema or fatal neurotoxicity; all resolved with supportive therapy. One fatal SAE (bone marrow failure) occurred in cohort 2; investigations have not identified a mechanism by which NY-ESO-1c259T may have caused this event. Conclusions: NY-ESO-1c259T has promising efficacy and acceptable safety. CRS is not associated with severe neurotoxicity and appears manageable with appropriate supportive care. Cohort 3 data indicate that Flu may be important for efficacy. Efficacy and safety data will be further evaluated and presented. Clinical trial information: NCT01343043. [Table: see text]

Practical Issues for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Background

Retroperitoneal sarcoma is rare. Using initial specimens on biopsy, a definitive diagnosis of histological subtypes is ideal but not always achievable.

Methods

A retrospective institutional review was performed for all cases of adult retroperitoneal sarcoma from 1996 to 2015. A review of the literature was also performed related to the distribution of retroperitoneal sarcoma subtypes. A meta-analysis was performed.

Results

Liposarcoma is the most common subtype (45%), followed by leiomyosarcoma (21%), not otherwise specified (8%), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (6%) by literature review. Data from Moffitt Cancer Center demonstrate the same general distribution for subtypes of retroperitoneal sarcoma. A pathology-based algorithm for the diagnosis of retroperitoneal sarcoma is illustrated, and common pitfalls in the pathology of retroperitoneal sarcoma are discussed.

Conclusions

An informative diagnosis of retroperitoneal sarcoma via specimens on biopsy is achievable and meaningful to guide effective therapy. A practical and multidisciplinary algorithm focused on the histopathology is helpful for the management of retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Metabolic syndrome and colorectal cancer: is hyperinsulinemia/insulin receptor-mediated angiogenesis a critical process?

OBJECTIVE

Components of metabolic syndrome (MS) have been individually linked to colorectal cancer risk and prognosis; however, an understanding of the dominant mechanisms is lacking.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients (10 MS; 11 non-MS) with resectable colorectal cancer were prospectively enrolled. Patients were classified for MS by the World Health Organization criteria and tested for circulating vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), fasting insulin, and tumor expression of IGF-1 receptor (IGF-1R), insulin-receptor (IR) and receptor for advanced glycation end-products (RAGE). Circulating markers were re-tested 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The MS group had significantly higher baseline and post-operative fasting insulin levels (p < 0.001 and 0.003). No differences were observed in circulating IL-6, VEGF, IGF-1 and free IGF-1. By immunohistochemistry (IHC), IGF-1R expression was significantly higher in tumor vs. normal tissues (p < 0.001) while IR expression showed no difference. Interestingly, 64% of tumors demonstrated high IR positivity in the vessels within or surrounding the tumor stroma, but not in the vessels away from the tumor. By reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), tumor IGF-1R over-expression (80%) was confirmed, but there was no difference between MS and non-MS patients. Tumor RAGE over-expression was found in 67% of patients and was equally distributed between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperinsulinemia was the only significant factor distinguishing patients with colorectal cancer who have MS. The preferential over-expression of IR in the peri-tumoral microvessels suggests that hyperinsulinemia might contribute to colorectal cancer growth by enhancing angiogenesis.

Measuring quality of care in the treatment of colorectal cancer: the moffitt quality practice initiative

PURPOSE

The Moffitt Quality Practice Initiative (MQPI) is a practice-based system of quality self-assessment, the ultimate goal of which is to improve the quality of cancer care at a statewide level. The initial phase of this project focused on developing procedures, determining feasibility, and evaluating utility for assessing quality of care for colorectal cancer within an existing affiliate network.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Representatives from four oncology groups selected quality measures consistent with evidence-, consensus-, and safety-based guidelines that could be abstracted from medical records. Trained abstractors then reviewed records of all eligible colorectal patients seen by each practice in 2004. Frequencies of responses for each indicator were tabulated for overall and practice-specific level of adherence and were compared among practices.

RESULTS

Adherence was uniformly high for several indicators, including confirmatory pathology report, staging information, and chemotherapy discussion or recommendation. Lower adherence was evident across practices for performance of carcinoembryonic tests and complete colonoscopic evaluations. Significant variation among practices was evident only for consent for chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The initial phase of MQPI demonstrated the feasibility and utility of assessing quality indicators for colorectal cancer among members of an existing affiliate network. Findings identified areas where adherence to care was uniformly high, but also identified areas where both overall and practice-specific adherence were less than optimal. These efforts lay the groundwork for expanding MQPI in several directions that have in common the potential to improve the quality of cancer care on a statewide basis.

Measuring quality of care in the treatment of colorectal cancer: The Moffitt Network Initiative on Practice Quality (MNIPQ)

6001

Background: As the first step in a larger effort to improve quality of care among its member institutions, the MNIPQ sought to develop and implement methods to assess quality of care in the treatment of colorectal cancer. The current report focuses on our initial experience conducting quality assessments at 4 of 20 member institutions. Methods: Medical chart reviews were conducted of all patients diagnosed with colon or rectal cancer in 2004 and seen by a medical oncologist at the Moffitt Cancer Center or at any of three affiliate institutions. Abstractors, who were trained and periodically monitored, conducted the reviews using a web-based abstraction tool. Abstraction focused on assessing adherence to quality indicators consistent with evidence-, consensus-, and regulatory-based guidelines. Variability in adherence across sites was evaluated by conducting Fisher’s exact tests. The 186 patients whose charts were reviewed were predominantly female (57%) and diagnosed with colon cancer (74%). Results: Adherence was consistently (p values>.05) high across all four study sites for: presence of a pathology report confirming malignancy (91–100%); evidence of staging based on established criteria (88–94%); documentation of discussion or referral for chemotherapy in cases of lymph node (colon and rectal cancer) or rectal wall (rectal cancer) involvement (89–100%); and presence of chemotherapy flow sheets (92–100%). Adherence was consistently (p values>.05) lower across sites for: performance of complete colon evaluation within 12 months of surgery (24–47%) and performance of CEA test before (48–74%) or in the 6 months after (56–82%) surgery or chemotherapy. Adherence varied significantly (p < .001) across sites only for documentation of consent for patients treated with chemotherapy (41–100%). Discussion: Findings identified several areas where efforts should be made to improve the quality of colorectal cancer care at one or more member institutions. In addition, the methods developed have laid the groundwork for future efforts to measure and improve quality of care for other cancers and among a larger number of member institutions.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.