1
|
Hartgerink C, Toiv A, Sarowar A, Todd E, Nagai S, Muszkat Y, Beltran N, Jafri SM. Safety and Efficacy of Everolimus Use to Preserve Renal Function in Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantation Patients. Transplant Proc 2024; 56:2250-2254. [PMID: 39603963 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.10.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2024] [Revised: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 10/19/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As calcineurin inhibitors are associated with renal impairment post intestinal transplant, use of everolimus (EVR) may provide renal-sparing benefits. METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis focused on EVR use and renal function after intestinal or multivisceral transplant. No prisoners were used in the study. This study is compliant with the Helsinki Congress and the Declaration of Istanbul. RESULTS A total of 28 patients, 18 patients who underwent isolated intestinal transplant, and 10 patients who underwent multivisceral transplant, were included in this study. For 13 patients that never received EVR, the average change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) compared to baseline at the time of transplant were as follows: 1 year post-transplant = -18.1%; 2 years = -43.7%; 3 years = -44.1; and 5 years = -43.3%. For 15 patients who received EVR after transplant, average duration of EVR therapy was (579.60 ± 784.15) days with 87% of patients ultimately removed from medication due to side effects. In the EVR group, the average change in eGFR compared to baseline were as follows: 1 year post-transplant = -37.5%; 2 years = -43.5%; 3 years = -54.2%; and 5 years = -42.9%. After the initiation of EVR, the average change in eGFR compared to eGFR at time of EVR initiation was as follows: 1 year = +5.9%; 2 years = -1.57%; 3 years = -5.01%; and 5 years = -1.79%. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that EVR can play an important role in preserving renal function in intestinal and multivisceral transplant recipients, but tolerance of EVR is highly variable in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Avi Toiv
- Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Arif Sarowar
- Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Ella Todd
- Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Cocco P, Martinino A, Pinto F, Valdepenas B, Spaggiari M, Tzvetanov I, Benedetti E. Living Donor Intestinal Transplantation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2024; 53:441-452. [PMID: 39068005 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2023.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
This study explores intestinal transplantation (ITx) as a viable treatment option for intestinal failure (IF). Historical development, donor and recipient considerations, surgical techniques, immunosuppression, and outcomes, are reviewed with particular emphasis to the value of living donor ITx. The review highlights the evolution of ITx and emphasizes the ongoing need for patient-specific selection processes. In the realm of pediatric ITx, the article underlines the significance of early intervention to mitigate IF-related liver disease. Overall, it provides a comprehensive overview of this life-saving procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierpaolo Di Cocco
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Alessandro Martinino
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Federico Pinto
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Benito Valdepenas
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Mario Spaggiari
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ivo Tzvetanov
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Enrico Benedetti
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patwardhan S, Hong J, Weiner J. Update on Maintenance Immunosuppression in Intestinal Transplantation. Gastroenterol Clin North Am 2024; 53:493-507. [PMID: 39068010 PMCID: PMC11284276 DOI: 10.1016/j.gtc.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
Outcomes in intestinal transplantation remain hampered by higher rates of rejection than any other solid organs. However, maintenance immunosuppression regimens have largely remained unchanged despite advances in therapies for induction and treatment of rejection and graft-versus-host disease. Recently, there have been a small number of new maintenance therapies attempted, and older agents have been used in new ways to achieve better outcomes. The authors herein review the traditional maintenance therapies and their mechanisms and then consider updates in new therapies and new ways of using old therapies for maintenance immunosuppression after intestinal transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satyajit Patwardhan
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, 650 West 168th Street, BB1705, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Julie Hong
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, 650 West 168th Street, BB1705, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Joshua Weiner
- Columbia Center for Translational Immunology, 650 West 168th Street, BB1705, New York, NY 10032, USA; Division of Abdominal Organ Transplantation, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, 622 West 168th Street, PH14-105, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zhang J, Zhan H, Song Z, Liu S. Immune reactions following intestinal transplantation: Mechanisms and prevention. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:3819-3826. [PMID: 38431471 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2024.02.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
For patients with intestinal failure, small bowel transplantation remains one of the most effective treatments despite continuous advancements in parenteral nutrition techniques. Long-term use of parenteral nutrition can result in serious complications that lead to metabolic dysfunction and organ failure. However, the small intestine is a highly immunogenic organ with a large amount of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue and histocompatibility antigens; therefore, the small intestine is highly susceptible to severe immune rejection. This article discusses the mechanisms underlying immune rejection after small bowel transplantation and presents various options for prevention and treatment. Our findings offer new insights into the development of small bowel transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junhao Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China
| | - Hanxiang Zhan
- Department of General Surgery, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong, China
| | - Zifang Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
| | - Shanglong Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nelson J, Alvey N, Bowman L, Schulte J, Segovia M, McDermott J, Te HS, Kapila N, Levine DJ, Gottlieb RL, Oberholzer J, Campara M. Consensus recommendations for use of maintenance immunosuppression in solid organ transplantation: Endorsed by the American College of Clinical Pharmacy, American Society of Transplantation, and the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. Pharmacotherapy 2022; 42:599-633. [DOI: 10.1002/phar.2716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Joelle Nelson
- Department of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmacy Services University Health San Antonio Texas USA
- Pharmacotherapy Education and Research Center University of Texas Health San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA
- Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacotherapy Division, College of Pharmacy The University of Texas at Austin Austin Texas USA
| | - Nicole Alvey
- Department of Pharmacy Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA
- Science and Pharmacy Roosevelt University College of Health Schaumburg Illinois USA
| | - Lyndsey Bowman
- Department of Pharmacy Tampa General Hospital Tampa Florida USA
| | - Jamie Schulte
- Department of Pharmacy Services Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | | | - Jennifer McDermott
- Richard DeVos Heart and Lung Transplant Program, Spectrum Health Grand Rapids Michigan USA
- Department of Medicine, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine Grand Rapids Michigan USA
| | - Helen S. Te
- Liver Transplantation, Center for Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine University of Chicago Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA
| | - Nikhil Kapila
- Department of Transplant Hepatology Duke University Hospital Durham North Carolina USA
| | - Deborah Jo Levine
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA
| | - Robert L. Gottlieb
- Baylor University Medical Center and Baylor Scott and White Research Institute Dallas Texas USA
| | - Jose Oberholzer
- Department of Surgery/Division of Transplantation University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia USA
| | - Maya Campara
- Department of Surgery University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
- Department of Pharmacy Practice University of Illinois Chicago Chicago Illinois USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dogra H, Hind J. Innovations in Immunosuppression for Intestinal Transplantation. Front Nutr 2022; 9:869399. [PMID: 35782951 PMCID: PMC9241336 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.869399] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
It has been 57 years since the first intestinal transplant. An increased incidence of graft rejection has been described compared to other solid organ transplants due to high immunogenicity of the bowel, which in health allows the balance between of dietary antigen with defense against pathogens. Expanding clinical experience, knowledge of gastrointestinal physiology and immunology have progress post-transplant immunosuppressive drug regimens. Current regimes aim to find the window between prevention of rejection and the risk of infection (the leading cause of death) and malignancy. The ultimate aim is to achieve graft tolerance. In this review we discuss advances in mucosal immunology and technologies informing the development of new anti-rejection strategies with the hope of improved survival in the next generation of transplant recipients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Early Use of Everolimus as a Third Immunosuppressive Agent for Intestinal Transplantation: A Report of 2 Cases. Transplant Proc 2022; 54:472-475. [DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2022.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
8
|
Graft Versus Host Disease After Intestinal Transplantation: A Single-center Experience. Transplant Direct 2021; 7:e731. [PMID: 34291153 PMCID: PMC8291352 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Background. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) is an uncommon but highly morbid complication of intestinal transplantation (ITx). In this study, we reviewed our 17-y experience with GVHD focusing on factors predicting GVHD occurrence and survival. Methods. Retrospective review of 271 patients who received 1 or more ITx since program inception in 2003 with survival analysis using Cox proportional hazard modeling. Results. Of 271 patients, 28 developed GHVD 34 (18–66) d after ITx presenting with rash or rash with fever in 26, rectosigmoid disease in 1, and hemolysis in 1; other sites, mainly rectosigmoid colon, were involved in 13. Initial skin biopsy demonstrated classic findings in 6, compatible findings in 14, and no abnormalities in 2. Additional sites of GVHD later emerged in 14. Of the 28 patients, 16 died largely from sepsis, the only independent hazard for death (hazard ratio [HR], 37.4181; P = 0.0008). Significant (P < 0.0500) independent hazards for occurrence of GVHD in adults were pre-ITx functional intestinal failure (IF) (HR, 15.2448) and non-IF diagnosis (HR, 20.9952) and early post-ITx sirolimus therapy (HR, 0.0956); independent hazards in children were non-IF diagnosis (HR, 4.3990), retransplantation (HR, 4.6401), donor:recipient age ratio (HR, 7.3190), and graft colon omission (HR, 0.1886). Variant transplant operation was not an independent GVHD hazard. Conclusions. Initial diagnosis of GVHD after ITx remains largely clinical, supported but not often confirmed by skin biopsy. Although GVHD risk is mainly recipient-driven, changes in donor selection and immunosuppression practice may reduce incidence and improve survival.
Collapse
|
9
|
Andres AM, Talayero P, Alcolea Sanchez A, Sanchez Galán A, Serradilla Rodríguez J, Bueno Jimenez A, Gonzalez Sacristan R, Stringa P, Papa Gobbi R, Lasa Lazaro M, Díaz Almirón M, Ramos Boluda E, Lopez Santamaría M, Hernández Oliveros F. Delayed introduction of sirolimus in paediatric intestinal transplant recipients: indications and long-term benefits. Transpl Int 2021; 34:1895-1907. [PMID: 34174115 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
To review our experience using sirolimus in a single centre paediatric intestinal transplantation cohort. Intestinal transplant patients with more than 3 months follow-up were divided into two groups according to their immunosuppression regimen: tacrolimus, (TAC group, n = 45 grafts) or sirolimus (SRL group, n = 38 grafts), which included those partially or completely converted from tacrolimus to sirolimus. The indications to switch were tacrolimus side effects and immunological complications. Survival and complications were retrospectively analysed comparing both groups. SRL was introduced 9 months (0 months-16.9 years) after transplant. The main cause for conversion was worsening renal function (45%), followed by haemolytic anaemia (21%) and graft-versus-host-disease (16%). Both groups showed a similar overall patient/graft survival (P = 0.76/0.08) and occurrence of rejection (24%/17%, P = 0.36). Immunological complications did not recur after conversion. Renal function significantly improved in most SRL patients. After a median follow-up of 65.17 months, 28/46 survivors were on SRL, 26 with monotherapy, with good graft function. Over one-third of our patients eventually required SRL conversion that allowed to improve their kidney function and immunological events, without entailing additional complications or survival impairment. Further trials are warranted to clarify the potential improvement of the standard tacrolimus maintenance by sirolimus conversion or addition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane M Andres
- Pediatric Surgery Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Idipaz Institute, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,TransplantChild ERN, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma Talayero
- Immunology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Pablo Stringa
- Idipaz Institute, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Institute for Immunological and Physiopathological Studies (IIFP-CONICET-UNLP), National University of La Plata, La plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Maria Lasa Lazaro
- Immunology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariana Díaz Almirón
- Biostatistics Department, Idipaz Institute, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Francisco Hernández Oliveros
- Pediatric Surgery Department, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,Idipaz Institute, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.,TransplantChild ERN, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Modi K, Segovia M, Mavis A, Schiano T, Patel Y, Boike J, Sudan D, Nagai S, Jafri SM. Efficacy and safety of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors following intestinal and multivisceral transplantation. Clin Transplant 2021; 35:e14324. [PMID: 34046945 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 04/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
This is a descriptive study reviewing the outcomes of mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORs) in intestinal (IT) and multivisceral transplantation (MVT). This study included 22 patients, 20 adults, and two children, and an overall mean age of 46 years old at the time of transplantation. Twelve patients (54.5%) received IT, and the remainder (45.5%) MVT. The mean time between transplantation and mTORs initiation was 24 months. The indication was worsening renal function in 13 patients (59%), with 9/13 (69.2%) noted to have an increase in glomerular filtration rate of at least 10 ml/min/1.73m2 . The indication for four patients (18.2%) was a history of neuroendocrine tumor. After mTOR initiation, 50% of patients were reduced or weaned off tacrolimus and 13.7% off prednisone. mTORs were discontinued in 11/22 patients. Six patients (54.5%) stopped due to side effects, two (18.1%) for surgery, and one (9%) for acute cellular rejection. Side effects were edema (33.3%), headaches (33.3%), diarrhea (16.7%), and oral ulcers (16.7%). The average duration of mTORs prior to discontinuation due to side effects was 7 months. mTORs may function in their own niche of patients due to the potential renal safety profile, but use is most limited by tolerance to side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishna Modi
- Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Maria Segovia
- Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Alisha Mavis
- Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Duke Children's Hospital and Health Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Yuval Patel
- Gastroenterology/Hepatology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | | | - Debra Sudan
- Transplant Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Shunji Nagai
- Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Courbage S, Canioni D, Talbotec C, Lambe C, Chardot C, Rabant M, Galmiche L, Corcos O, Goulet O, Joly F, Lacaille F. Beyond 10 years, with or without an intestinal graft: Present and future? Am J Transplant 2020; 20:2802-2812. [PMID: 32277553 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Revised: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Long-term outcomes in children undergoing intestinal transplantation remain unclear. Seventy-one children underwent intestinal transplantation in our center from 1989 to 2007. We report on 10-year posttransplant outcomes with (group 1, n = 26) and without (group 2, n = 9) a functional graft. Ten-year patient and graft survival rates were 53% and 36%, respectively. Most patients were studying or working, one third having psychiatric disorders. All patients in group 1 were weaned off parenteral nutrition with mostly normal physical growth and subnormal energy absorption. Graft histology from 15 late biopsies showed minimal abnormality. However, micronutrient deficiencies and fat malabsorption were frequent; biliary complications occurred in 4 patients among the 17 who underwent liver transplantation; median renal clearance was 87 mL/min/1.73 m2 . Four patients in group 1 experienced late acute rejection. Among the 9 patients in group 2, 4 died after 10 years and 2 developed significant liver fibrosis. Liver transplantation and the use of a 3-drug regimen including sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil were associated with improved graft survival. Therefore, intestinal transplantation may enable a satisfactory digestive function in the long term. The prognosis of graft removal without retransplantation is better than expected. Regular monitoring of micronutrients, early psychological assessment, and use of sirolimus are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Courbage
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Danielle Canioni
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Talbotec
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Cécile Lambe
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Chardot
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marion Rabant
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Louise Galmiche
- Department of Pathology, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Corcos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nutrition Support and Intestinal Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Olivier Goulet
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Francisca Joly
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nutrition Support and Intestinal Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, University of Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Florence Lacaille
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lauro A, Oltean M, Marino IR. Chronic Rejection After Intestinal Transplant: Where Are We in Order to Avert It? Dig Dis Sci 2018; 63:551-562. [PMID: 29327261 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-018-4909-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 01/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Chronic rejection affects the long-term survival of all solid organ transplants and, among intestinal allografts, occurs in up to 10% of the recipients. The insidious clinical evolution of the chronic allograft enteropathy, the absence of noninvasive biomarkers, and the late endoscopic findings delay its diagnosis. No pharmacological approach has been proven effective, and allograft removal nowadays still represents the only available therapy. The inclusion of the liver in the visceral allograft appears to be the only intervention affecting the development of chronic rejection, as revealed by large-center studies and registry reports. A significant body of evidence emerged from the experimental setting and provided essential knowledge on the complex mechanisms behind the development of chronic allograft enteropathy. More recently, donor-specific antibodies have been suggested as an early, key element in the natural history of chronic allograft enteropathy and several novel approaches, tackling the antibody-mediated graft injury, have gained acceptance in clinical settings and are believed to impact on chronic rejection. The inclusion of a liver allograft is advocated when re-transplanting a sensitized recipient, due to its protective effect against humoral immunity. Multicenter trials are required to understand and tackle chronic rejection, and find the therapeutic answer to this clinical dilemma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Augusto Lauro
- Liver and Multiorgan Transplant Unit, St. Orsola University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Mihai Oltean
- The Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Ignazio R Marino
- Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature on the current indications, surgical techniques, immunosuppressive therapy and outcomes following intestinal transplantation (ITx). RECENT FINDINGS Over recent years, ITx has become a more common operation with approximately 2500 procedures carried out worldwide by 2014. It is reserved for patients with intestinal failure and who have developed complications of home parenteral nutrition or who have a high risk of dying from their underlying disease. Recent advances such as the improvement in survival rates, not only for isolated small bowel transplants but also following inclusion of a liver graft in combined liver-small bowel transplant, and the utility of citrulline as a noninvasive biomarker to appreciate acute rejection herald an exciting shift in the field of ITx. SUMMARY With advancements in immunosuppressive drugs, induction regimens, standardization of surgical techniques and improved postoperative care, survival is increasing. In due course, it will most likely become as good as remaining on home parenteral nutrition and as such could become a viable first-line option.
Collapse
|
14
|
Rao B, Segovia MC, Kazimi M, Parekh R, Raoufi M, Jafri SM. Use of Everolimus After Multivisceral Transplantation: A Report of Two Cases. Transplant Proc 2017; 48:485-8. [PMID: 27109983 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.11.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2015] [Revised: 11/04/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Inhibitors of mechanistic target of rapamycin are used in solid organ transplant procedures to avoid calcineurin inhibitor complications, including nephrotoxicity and malignancy. We present 2 cases of multivisceral transplantation for neuroendocrine tumor (NET) for which everolimus was implemented for its potential to prevent NET recurrence as well as preserve renal function. The first case was complicated by NET recurrence in the liver before initiation of everolimus. After initiation of everolimus, the patient developed a ventral hernia and elevated aminotransferase levels with nonspecific biopsy findings. The second case was complicated by cytomegalovirus infection with elevated everolimus trough levels as well as acute cellular rejection. Everolimus was reinitiated in both cases in addition to decreasing the dosage of tacrolimus, and there were no further complications. Everolimus was beneficial in stabilizing renal function in both patients and has the theoretical potential to prevent recurrence of NET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Rao
- Department of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - M C Segovia
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
| | - M Kazimi
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - R Parekh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - M Raoufi
- Department of Pathology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| | - S-M Jafri
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kubal CA, Mangus RS, Tector AJ. Intestine and multivisceral transplantation: current status and future directions. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2015; 17:427. [PMID: 25613179 DOI: 10.1007/s11894-014-0427-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Intestinal failure and associated parenteral nutrition-induced liver failure cause significant morbidity, mortality, and health care burden. Intestine transplantation is now considered to be the standard of care in patients with intestinal failure who fail intestinal rehabilitation. Intestinal failure-associated liver disease is an important sequela of intestinal failure, caused by parenteral lipids, requiring simultaneous liver-intestine transplant. Lipid minimization and, in recent years, the emergence of fish oil-based lipid emulsions have been shown to reverse parenteral nutrition-associated hyperbilirubinemia, but not fibrosis. Significant progress in surgical techniques and immunosuppression has led to improved outcomes after intestine transplantation. Intestine in varying combination with liver, stomach, and pancreas, also referred to as multivisceral transplantation, is performed for patients with intestinal failure along with liver disease, surgical abdominal catastrophes, neuroendocrine and slow-growing tumors, and complete portomesenteric thrombosis with cirrhosis of the liver. Although acute and chronic rejection are major problems, long-term survivors have excellent quality of life and remain free of parenteral nutrition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chandrashekhar A Kubal
- Transplant Division, Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 550 N University Blvd, Room 4601, Indianapolis, IN, 46202-5250, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Pech T, Fujishiro J, Finger T, von Websky M, Stoffels B, Wehner S, Abu-Elmagd K, Kalff JC, Schaefer N. Effects of immunosuppressive therapy after experimental small bowel transplantation in rats. Transpl Immunol 2011; 25:112-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trim.2011.07.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2011] [Revised: 07/12/2011] [Accepted: 07/12/2011] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
17
|
Kahan BD. Forty years of publication of Transplantation Proceedings--the fourth decade: Globalization of the enterprise. Transplant Proc 2011; 43:3-29. [PMID: 21335147 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.12.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Barry D Kahan
- Division of Immunology and Organ Transplantation, The University of Texas-Health Science Center at Houston Medical School, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Andres AM, Lopez Santamaría M, Ramos E, Hernandez F, Prieto G, Encinas J, Leal N, Molina M, Sarría J, Tovar J. The use of sirolimus as a rescue therapy in pediatric intestinal transplant recipients. Pediatr Transplant 2010; 14:931-5. [PMID: 20946188 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01363.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
To review our experience with SRL as a second-line therapy in our series of 45 SBTx recipients (1997-2009). Retrospective review of five children converted to SRL: 3 M/2 F; median of three yr old (range 20 months-18 yr); rescue indications, adverse events with SRL, resolution of tacrolimus-related side effects, incidence of rejection, PTLD, or GVHD were summarized. Tacrolimus was discontinued (average 13 months after transplant) because of refractory hemolytic anemia in four patients with decreased renal function and because of advanced renal failure and unclear neutropenia in one. PTLD and GVHD had been previously diagnosed in two. Tacrolimus-related side effects disappeared in all five although other immunosuppressants and splenectomy were used simultaneously or later in most of them. Adverse events reported after the conversion were infections (tuberculosis and Pneumocystis carinii in two) and mild hypertriglyceridemia. No rejection, GVHD, or PTLD episode was observed. Four patients are alive with excellent quality of life (median follow-up 18 months). Sirolimus is a safe rescue therapy in SBTx children when tacrolimus is not well tolerated. Renal function and hematologic disorders seem to improve, although other simultaneous strategies could be also involved. Further studies could demonstrate its efficacy as a first-line treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ane M Andres
- Pediatric Surgery, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
|