Surgical site and early urinary tract infections in 1000 kidney transplants with antimicrobial perioperative prophylaxis

Epidemiology of surgical site infections after solid organ transplants in the period 2015-2019: A single-center retrospective cohort study

Surgical site infections (SSI) are severe complications of solid organ transplant (SOT). This retrospective study assessed the epidemiology of and outcomes associated with invasive primary SSI (IP-SSI) occurring within 3 months of transplantation in adult SOT recipients at Duke University over a 5-year period (2015-2019). Among 2073 consecutive SOT recipients, 198 IP-SSI were identified. The IP-SSI rate declined over the period (14.4% in 2015 vs. 8.3% in 2019) and was higher among multi-organ compared with single-organ transplants (33.9% vs. 8.1%, p < .01). SOT recipients with IP-SSI had longer hospital stays than patients without SSI (30.0 vs. 17.0 days, p < .01). Transplant hospitalization (9.6% vs. 2.2%, p < .01), 6-month (11.6% vs. 3.3%, p < .01), and 1-year mortality (15.7% vs. 5.8%, p < .01) were higher in SOT recipients with IP-SSI than in those without. While Gram-positive bacteria were the most common pathogens, urogenital Mollicute and atypical Mycobacteria were identified as an unexpected cause of IP-SSI, particularly among lung transplant recipients. The median time to IP-SSI was 24.0 (IQR 13.8-48.3) days, although the time to IP-SSI varied based on organ transplanted and the causative pathogen. IP-SSI is an important and potentially modifiable complication of SOT, associated with prolonged hospitalizations and reduced survival, particularly in the lung transplant population.

Single-center experience with perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infections in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Infections in kidney transplant recipients are particularly challenging owing to the immunosuppressive treatment, usually long history of chronic illness, comorbidities and prior exposures to antibiotics. Among the most common complications early after surgery are surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors and evaluate epidemiological data regarding surgical site infections. Moreover, we were able to compare the current results with historical data from our institution when different perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis was practiced.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study in a group of 254 deceased donor renal graft recipients transplanted in a single Central European institution. We evaluated epidemiological findings and resistance patterns of pathogens causing surgical site infections. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine risk factors for surgical site infections.

RESULTS

We revealed no differences in baseline characteristics between patients with and without surgical site infections. Ten surgical site infections (3.9%) were diagnosed (six superficial incisional, two deep incisional, and two organ/space). Eight species (19 strains) were identified, most of which were multi-drug resistant (63%). The most common was extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (26%). We showed that statistically significant differences were present between reoperated and non-reoperated patients (adjusted odds ratio: 6.963, 95% confidence interval 1.523-31.842, P = .012).

CONCLUSIONS

Reoperation is an individual risk factor for surgical site infection after kidney transplantation. According to our experience, cefazolin-based prophylaxis can be safe and is associated with relatively low prevalence of surgical site infections.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Urologic Procedures in Paediatric Patients: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study in Italy

The main aim of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in urologic procedures is to prevent bacteraemia, surgical site infections (SSIs), and postoperative urinary tract infections (ppUTIs). Guidelines for SAP in paediatric urology are lacking. Only some aspects of this complex topic have been studied, and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to surgical procedures seems to be more often linked to institutional schools of thought or experts’ opinions than to rules dictated by studies demonstrating the most correct and preferred management. Therefore, the aim of this Consensus document realized using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method is to provide clinicians with a series of recommendations on SAP for the prevention of bacteraemia, SSIs, and ppUTIs after urologic imaging and surgical procedures in paediatric patients. Despite the few available studies, experts agree on some basilar concepts related to SAP for urologic procedures in paediatric patients. Before any urological procedure is conducted, UTI must be excluded. Clean procedures do not require SAP, with the exception of prosthetic device implantation and groin and perineal incisions where the SSI risk may be increased. In contrast, SAP is needed in clean-contaminated procedures. Studies have also suggested the safety of eliminating SAP in paediatric hernia repair and orchiopexy. To limit the emergence of resistance, every effort to reduce and rationalize antibiotic consumption for SAP must be made. Increased use of antibiotic stewardship can be greatly effective in this regard.

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Abdominal Surgery for Neonates and Paediatrics: A RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Consensus Study

Surgical site infections (SSIs), i.e., surgery-related infections that occur within 30 days after surgery without an implant and within one year if an implant is placed, complicate surgical procedures in up to 10% of cases, but an underestimation of the data is possible since about 50% of SSIs occur after the hospital discharge. Gastrointestinal surgical procedures are among the surgical procedures with the highest risk of SSIs, especially when colon surgery is considered. Data that were collected from children seem to indicate that the risk of SSIs can be higher than in adults. This consensus document describes the use of preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis in neonates and children that are undergoing abdominal surgery and has the purpose of providing guidance to healthcare professionals who take care of children to avoid unnecessary and dangerous use of antibiotics in these patients. The following surgical procedures were analyzed: (1) gastrointestinal endoscopy; (2) abdominal surgery with a laparoscopic or laparotomy approach; (3) small bowel surgery; (4) appendectomy; (5) abdominal wall defect correction interventions; (6) ileo-colic perforation; (7) colorectal procedures; (8) biliary tract procedures; and (9) surgery on the liver or pancreas. Thanks to the multidisciplinary contribution of experts belonging to the most important Italian scientific societies that take care of neonates and children, this document presents an invaluable reference tool for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in the paediatric and neonatal populations.

Anaesthesia for renal transplantation

Renal transplantation is the most common procedure in solid organ transplantation. Compered to dialysis, renal transplantation offers better quality of life and overall survival for patients. Due to the improvement of surgical technique, imunosupressive therapy and medical monitor-ing in general, the outcome of treatment has significantly improved today. The importance of the anesthesiologists and the correct performance of all procedures during this treatment has been shown in many studies related to the outcome. In addition to the correct selection of anesthesia drugs, it is very important to pay attention to the position-ing of the patient, adequate monitoring, careful fluid re-placement and the type of fluid intra-and postoperative, as well as adequate pain control after the procedure.

Perioperative fosfomycin disodium prophylaxis against urinary tract infection in renal transplant recipients: a randomized clinical trial

Background

Symptomatic urinary tract infection (UTI) is the most common infectious complication in renal transplant recipients (RTRs). Fosfomycin (FOS) is an attractive alternative for prophylaxis because it does not interact with immunosuppressants; although 90% is excreted unchanged in the urine, it does not require adjustment for renal function for single dose prophylaxis.

Methods

RTRs were recruited into this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized (1:1) to receive one 4 g dose of FOS disodium intravenously 3 h (FOS group) or placebo (placebo group) before placement and removal of a urinary catheter and before removal of a double-J ureteral stent. All participants received prophylaxis with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. The main outcome was a comparison of the mean number of symptomatic UTI and asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) episodes per patient during a 7-week follow-up period. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NTC03235947.

Results

Eighty-two participants were included (41 in the FOS group and 41 in placebo group). The mean number of AB or symptomatic UTI episodes per patient was lower in the FOS group [intention-to-treat (ITT) 0.29 versus 0.60, P = 0.04]. The incidence of symptomatic UTI was lower in the FOS group (ITT, 7.3% versus 36.6%, P = 0.001), and there was no difference in the incidence of AB between both groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups.

Conclusions

FOS addition is an effective and safe strategy to reduce the number of symptomatic UTIs during the first 7 weeks after renal transplant.

Impact of Treating Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Prospective Cohort Study

This study aims to define the epidemiologic, clinical, and microbiological features of asymptomatic bacteriuria (AB) and cystitis in kidney transplantation recipients (KTRs), and to determine the impact of antimicrobial therapy of AB and the risk factors of cystitis. We conducted a prospective observational study of AB and cystitis in KTRs from January to June 2017. One-hundred ninety seven KTRs were included: 175 (88.8%) with AB and 22 (11.2%) with cystitis. The most frequent etiologies were Escherichia coli, Klebsiellapneumoniae, Enterococcusfaecalis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. No differences were observed regarding the etiologies, antimicrobial susceptibility patterns, and microbiologic outcomes in AB vs. cystitis. The treatment of AB diminished the microbiological cure and increased the rates of microbiologic relapses and reinfections; in addition, treated AB patients showed a trend of developing symptomatic urinary tract infection in the following six months. The analysis of the data identified the following independent risk factors for cystitis during the six months of follow-up: AB treatment, thymoglobulin induction, previous acute pyelonephritis, and time since transplantation < 1 year. In summary, considering the lack of clinical benefits of treating AB and its impact on cystitis development in the follow-up, we support the recommendation of not screening for or treating AB.

Compliance with surgical prophylaxis guidelines in liver and kidney transplantations

Background Patients undergoing solid organ transplantations are at a high risk of surgical site infections. Complying with surgical prophylaxis guidelines minimize post-operative infection rate. Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the compliance with the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists surgical prophylaxis guidelines related to antibiotic selection, dosing, administration time, and duration of surgical prophylaxis in liver and kidney transplantations. However, the re-dosing time was only assessed for liver transplantation cases. Setting The study was conducted at the solid organ transplantation center at King Abdualziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Method A retrospective chart review including all patients who had a liver or kidney transplantation from January 2016 to December 2018. Main outcome measure The compliance rate with the surgical prophylaxis guideline related to selecting the recommended antibiotic, dosing, administration time, and antibiotic exposure duration. The re-dosing time was assessed in liver transplantations. Results The study included 54 liver recipients and 163 kidney recipients, with an average age of 56 and 43 years, respectively. The majority of the included patients (68% and 56%) were male in both groups. The compliance rates to the recommendations in liver and kidney operations were 82.6% and 77.09% in terms of the choice of antibiotic, 44.5% and 13.4% in terms of dosing, 31.5% and 43.5% in terms of timing, and 18.47% and 84.36% in terms of duration, respectively. None of liver recipients received a re-dosed antibiotic at the recommended time. Conclusion The study concluded that there was an optimal compliance rate to the choice of antibiotic recommendations in both liver and kidney transplantations. Similarly, a high compliance rate was observed for the duration of antibiotic exposure after kidney transplantations. However, the compliance rate in terms of dosing and administration time was low in both transplantations. Low compliance rates were also observed in the duration of antibiotic exposure and the re-dosing time recommendations in liver transplants.

Effectiveness of Factor XIII Infusion in Treatment of Refractory Ureteral Leakage after Kidney Transplantation

Despite the evolution of transplantation techniques, urological complications are common and result in loss of graft. We report the case of a 57-year-old man who developed continuous urine leakage despite pyeloureteral neoanastomosis and stenting after kidney transplantation from his dizygotic twin. Suspecting ureteral leakage, we performed pyeloureteral neoanastomosis using his native right ureter and a ureteral stent 5 days after the kidney transplant. However, urine leakage continued for several days. Because the plasma factor XIII level decreased to 48%, we administered factor XIII products (Fibrogammin P; CSL Behring, King of Prussia, PA) after the surgery. Although its utility and safety in patients with renal failure and/or transplantation are unclear, urine leakage stopped after the infusion of fibrogammin without any side effects. This is the first case report of the use of factor XIII for refractory urine leakage after kidney transplantation. Although further studies are needed, administration of factor XIII products could be one option for refractory urine leakage after transplantation.

Antibiotic therapy in case of positive cultures of kidney transplant preservation fluid: a nationwide survey of prescribing practices

Our survey aimed to describe current prescribing practices for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in French kidney transplant centers. We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional clinical vignette-based survey that we sent via email to hospital practitioners involved in perioperative management of kidney transplant patients (KTR). Nearly half of practitioners contacted (182/427, 42.6%) were respondents. A total of 167 getting enough kidney transplant activity were eligible for the survey. The response rate was 50.7% (68/134) among interns and 33.8% (99/293) among seniors. Positive perfusion fluids (PF) cultures for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus were associated with antibiotic prescribing in 35% of cases, with no difference in prescribing in patients with diabetes, obesity, or delayed graft function. Antibiotic prescribing was most frequent with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (67%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains producing extended spectrum β-lactamases (57%). About 77%, 16%, and 13% of respondents, respectively, reported the existence of local practice guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis, a standardized approach for antibiotic prescribing in case of positive kidney transplant PF cultures, and local practice guidelines for systematical antibiotic prophylaxis in the early post-transplant period. In France, antibiotic prophylaxis practices in the perioperative kidney transplant period are very heterogeneous. To prevent unnecessary prescribing and bacterial resistance, evidence-based practice guidelines should be developed.

Beyond death and graft survival-Variation in outcomes after kidney transplantation. Results from the NSQIP Transplant beta phase

The National Surgical Quality Program (NSQIP) Transplant was designed by transplant surgeons from the ground up to track posttransplant outcomes beyond basic recipient and graft survival. After an initial pilot phase, the program has expanded to 29 participating sites and enrolled more than 4300 recipient-donor pairs into the database, including 2876 complete kidney transplant cases. In this analysis, surgical site infection (SSI), urinary tract infection (UTI), and reoperation/intervention were evaluated for kidney transplant recipients. We observed impressive variation in the crude incidence between sites for SSI (0%-17%), UTI (0%-14%), and reoperation/intervention (0%-25%). After adjustment for donor and recipient factors, 2 sites were outliers with respect to their incidence of UTI. For the first time, the field of transplantation has data that demonstrate variation in kidney recipient surgical outcomes between sites. More importantly, NSQIP Transplant provides a powerful platform to improve care beyond basic patient and graft survival.

Reoperation in Early Kidney Post-transplant Period as a Strong Risk Factor of Surgical Site Infection Occurrence

BACKGROUND

One of the most common infective complications after kidney transplant (KTx) is surgical site infection (SSI). Providing indications of improvement of perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) and allowing the characterization of risk factors are critical to reduce SSI. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the SSI risk factors and impact of reoperation in the early post-transplant period on SSI occurrence and assess if standard PAP in those cases is a best consideration.

METHODS

Between April 2014 and October 2015, a total of 236 KTxs were performed in our center. Deceased donor data, recipient data, and data related to surgical procedures were collected.

RESULTS

Surgical site infections were reported in 5.6% (12/214) of patients. Seven patients were diagnosed as having superficial SSI (7/12; 58.3%), 2 with deep SSI (2/12; 16.6%), and 4 with organ-specific SSI (4/12; 33.3%). Extended criteria donor-related transplant, cold ischemia time > 22 hours, dialysis period > 30 months, recipient age older than 45 years, recipient body mass index > 27, induction therapy prior to transplant, diabetes prior to transplant, and ≥ 1 reoperation during 30 days of observation were independent risk factors of SSI occurrence. A total of 19 reoperations were performed in 17 patients. In 8 of all 12 patients with SSI diagnosis, the reoperation was performed (66.7%). In 202 patients of non-SSI patients, only 9 reoperations were performed (4.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Early reoperation after Ktx is a strong risk factor of SSI occurrence. There is a probability that > 4 SSI risk factors and reoperation in the early post-transplant period could require different and more aggressive proceeding, as standard PAP in those cases is insufficient.

Use of single-dose perioperative antimicrobial therapy is acceptable in recipients of living-donor renal transplants in the rituximab era

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of single-dose perioperative antimicrobial therapy as infection prophylaxis in recipients of living-donor renal transplants in the rituximab era.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2009 and 2017, 84 recipients underwent living-donor renal transplantation (LDRT) at Okayama University Hospital; 3 with vascular/urinary complications requiring additional surgery were excluded from this analysis. Data including recipient characteristics, antimicrobial prophylaxis and administration of rituximab were retrospectively examined for an association with perioperative infections. Prophylactic antimicrobial agents, selected according to the Results of preoperative urine cultures, were administered just before incision. Perioperative infections, which consisted of surgical site infections, remote infections, and urinary tract infections, were defined as a positive culture indicating required administration of additional antimicrobial agents.

RESULTS

Among the 81 recipients, prophylactic cefazolin, ampicillin/sulbactam, and others were administered to 66 (82%), 13 (16%), and 2 (3%) recipients, respectively. Twenty-one (26%) received single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis, while 60 (74%) received multiple doses up to 7 days. Rituximab was used in 59 (72.8%) recipients. The incidence of urinary tract infection, surgical site infection and remote infection was 13 (16%), 1 (1%), and 0, respectively. Univariate analysis could not demonstrate any significant risk factors for postoperative urinary tract infections, including a single dose vs multiple doses of antimicrobial therapy (P = 0.069) and administration of rituximab (P = 0.717).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that the use of single-dose perioperative antimicrobial therapy is acceptable for prophylaxis of infections in patients undergoing LDRT, even in the rituximab era.

Evaluating a Change in Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Kidney Transplant Recipients

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate if a change in practice from January 2013 to August 2015 affected the rate of surgical-site infections following kidney transplantation at the single academic medical center. More patients were found to have a surgical-site infection when surgical antibiotics were only given intra-operatively despite a lower incidence of risk factors identified in the literature when compared to the cohort who received antibiotics intra-op and post-op for 24 hours.

Early urological complications after kidney transplantation: An overview

Urological complications, especially urine leaks, remain the most common type of surgical complication in the early post-transplant period. Despite major advances in the field of transplantation, a small minority of kidney transplants are still being lost due to urological problems. Many of these complications can be traced back to the time of retrieval and implantation. Serial ultrasound examination of the transplanted graft in the early post-operative period is of key importance for early detection. The prognosis is generally excellent if recognized and managed in a timely fashion. The purpose of this narrative review is to discuss the different presentations, compare various ureterovesical anastomosis techniques and provide a basic overview for the management of post-transplant urological complications.

The challenge of urinary tract infections in renal transplant recipients

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant patients. These infections are quite common, and the goal of care is to identify and reduce risk factors while providing effective prophylaxis and treatment. Better understanding of long-term outcomes from these infections has led to the distinctions among UTI, recurrent UTI, and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB), and that each requires a different therapeutic approach. Specifically, new research has supported the perspective that asymptomatic bacteriuria should not be treated. Symptomatic UTI, on the other hand, requires intervention and remains an ongoing challenge for infectious disease clinicians. Many bacteria species are responsible for UTI in renal transplant patients, and in recent years there has been a global rise in infection caused by bacteria with newly acquired antibacterial resistance genes. Many renal transplant patients who experience UTI will also have multiple recurring episodes, which likely has a distinct pathophysiological mechanism leading to chronic colonization of the urinary tract. In these cases, long-term management includes bacterial suppression, which aims to reduce rather than eliminate bacteria to levels below the threshold for symptomatic infection. This review will address the current understanding of UTI epidemiology, pathogenesis, and risk factors in the renal transplant community, and also focus on current prevention and treatment strategies for patients who face an environment of increasingly antibiotic-resistant bacteria.