Donor Smoking and Older Age Increases Morbidity and Mortality After Lung Transplantation

Lung Transplantation From Donors With a History of Substance Use

BACKGROUND

Substance use is common among lung transplant donors, but concerns persist about graft damage. Stimulant drugs such as cocaine and methamphetamine can induce pulmonary arterial hypertension, while smoked products such as cannabis and crack cocaine can produce airway and parenchymal diseases. We sought to characterize donor substance use at our center and evaluate the associations with recipient survival as well as chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD3), and baseline lung allograft dysfunction (BLAD).

METHODS

We studied patients with double lung transplants in our program between 2004 and 2016, including a history of donor substance use with nine pre-specified agents. We modeled the association with time to death or retransplant, CLAD, severe PGD, and BLAD.

RESULTS

Of 473 recipients, 186 (39%) received lungs from a donor with a history of substance use with at least one of the pre-specified substances. There was no overall relationship between donor substance use and any outcome. Heavy donor smoking was associated with an increased risk of death or retransplant (hazard ratio 1.47; p = 0.032), PGD3 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.13; p = 0.014), and BLAD (OR 2.56; p < 0.001). Donor crack cocaine use (n = 24) was also associated with worse survival (HR 2.16; 95% CI 1.16-3.66; p = 0.017) but not CLAD or BLAD. We noted no CLAD associations with any drug.

CONCLUSION

A history of donor substance use was common and in general not associated with worse outcomes, aside from heavy donor smoking. These findings may have implications for allocation and post-transplant graft dysfunction.

The Survival Benefit of Accepting an Older Donor Lung Transplant Compared With Waiting for a Younger Donor Offer

BACKGROUND

Donor pool expansion is critical as lung candidates suffer high mortality, yet older donor lungs remain underutilized. We evaluated whether accepting an older donor (defined 4 ways: donor age 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, or 60-69 y) lung transplant was associated with a survival benefit over waiting for a younger donor offer.

METHODS

Adult candidates who received a lung offer were identified using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data, 2015-2022. Offers were categorized by donor age and candidate lung allocation score (LAS; <40, 40-55, >55). Postoffer mortality was compared between candidates for whom the offer was accepted ("acceptors") versus declined ("decliners") within each age-LAS category using weighted Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 21 426 candidates received an offer from a donor age ≥30 y; 11 679 accepted. For LAS >55 candidates, a survival benefit was observed for acceptors of donors ages 30-39 y (weighted hazard ratio [wHR] of mortality: 0.450.520.59), 40-49 y (wHR: 0.610.700.79), and 50-59 y (wHR: 0.670.770.88); P < 0.001. For candidates with LAS 40-55, results suggest a survival benefit of accepting lung offers from donors age 30-39 y (wHR: 0.770.870.99) and 40-49 y (wHR: 0.760.870.99); P = 0.03. However, for candidates with LAS <40, a survival benefit was not observed for accepting any older donor transplant, with possible harm in accepting an age 50+ donor offer.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with declining and waiting for a younger donor offer, accepting an older donor lung transplant was associated with a survival advantage in candidates with high LAS in the precontinuous distribution era. Decision makers should consider these findings while recognizing potential changes in waiting time dynamics in the current era.

Effects of donor smoking history on early post-transplant lung function measured by oscillometry

Introduction

Prior studies assessing outcomes of lung transplants from cigarette-smoking donors found mixed results. Oscillometry, a non-invasive test of respiratory impedance, detects changes in lung function of smokers prior to diagnosis of COPD, and identifies spirometrically silent episodes of rejection post-transplant. We hypothesise that oscillometry could identify abnormalities in recipients of smoking donor lungs and discriminate from non-smoking donors.

Methods

This prospective single-center cohort study analysed 233 double-lung recipients. Oscillometry was performed alongside routine conventional pulmonary function tests (PFT) post-transplant. Multivariable regression models were constructed to compare oscillometry and conventional PFT parameters between recipients of lungs from smoking vs non-smoking donors.

Results

The analysis included 109 patients who received lungs from non-smokers and 124 from smokers. Multivariable analysis identified significant differences between recipients of smoking and non-smoking lungs in the oscillometric measurements R5-19, X5, AX, R5z and X5z, but no differences in %predicted FEV1, FEV1/FVC, %predicted TLC or %predicted DLCO. An analysis of the smoking group also demonstrated associations between increasing smoke exposure, quantified in pack years, and all the oscillometry parameters, but not the conventional PFT parameters.

Conclusion

An interaction was identified between donor-recipient sex match and the effect of smoking. The association between donor smoking and oscillometry outcomes was significant predominantly in the female donor/female recipient group.

Extending the age criteria of lung transplant donors to 70+ years old does not significantly affect recipient survival

OBJECTIVES

To determine the impact of older donor age (70+ years) on long-term survival and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant (LTx) recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study was performed on all LTx recipients from 2002 to 2017 and a modern subgroup from 2013 to 2017. Recipients were stratified into 4 groups based on donor lung age (<18, 18-55, 56-69, ≥70 years). Donor and recipient characteristics were compared using χ2 tests for differences in proportions and analysis of variance for differences in means. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression was used to describe differences in long-term survival and freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

RESULTS

Between 2002 and 2017, 1600 LTx were performed, 98 of which were performed from donors aged 70 years or older. Recipients of 70+ years donor lungs were significantly older with a mean age of 55.5 ± 12.9 years old (P = .001) and had more Status 3 (urgent) recipients (37.4%, P = .002). After multivariable regression, there were no significant differences in survival or freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction between the 4 strata of recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

Lung transplantation using donors 70 years old or older can be considered when all other parameters suggest excellent donor lung function without compromising short- or long-term outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of lung transplantation with ex vivo lung perfusion technique

Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) has demonstrated encouraging short- and medium-term outcomes with limited data available on its long-term outcomes. This study assesses (1) EVLP long-term outcomes and (2) EVLP era-based sub-analysis in addition to secondary outcomes of recipients with EVLP-treated donor lungs compared with recipients of conventionally preserved donor lungs in unmatched and propensity score-matched cohorts. Double lung transplants performed between 1st January 2012 and 31st December 2021 were included. A total of 57 recipients received EVLP-treated lungs compared to 202 unmatched and 57 matched recipients who were subjected to non-EVLP-treated lungs. The EVLP group had a significantly lower mean PaO2/FiO2 ratio and significantly higher mean BMI than the non-EVLP group in the unmatched and matched cohorts. The proportion of smoking history in the unmatched cohort was significantly higher in the EVLP group, while a similar smoking history was demonstrated in the matched cohorts. No difference was demonstrated in overall freedom from death and retransplantation between the groups in the unmatched and matched cohorts (unmatched: hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-2.07, P = 0.32; matched: HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.59-1.89). P = 0.89). In the unmatched cohort, overall freedom from chronic allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was significantly different between the groups (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.07-2.52, P = 0.02); however, the cumulative CLAD incidence was similar (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.1, P = 0.13). In the matched cohort, the overall freedom from CLAD (HR 1.69, 95% CI 0.97-2.95, P = 0.06) and cumulative CLAD incidence (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.37-2.215, P = 0.83) were similar between the groups. The EVLP era sub-analysis of the unmatched cohort in 2012-2014 had a significantly higher cumulative CLAD incidence in the EVLP group; however, this was not demonstrated in the matched cohort. All secondary outcomes were similar between the groups in the unmatched and matched cohorts. In conclusion, transplantation of marginal donor lungs after EVLP evaluation is non-detrimental compared to conventionally preserved donor lungs in terms of mortality, retransplantation, cumulative CLAD incidence, and secondary outcomes. Although the unmatched EVLP era of 2012-2014 had a significantly higher cumulative CLAD incidence, no such finding was demonstrated in the matched cohort of the same era.

The Impact of Donor Smoking on Primary Graft Dysfunction and Mortality after Lung Transplantation

Rationale: Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) is the leading cause of early morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation. Prior studies implicated proxy-defined donor smoking as a risk factor for PGD and mortality. Objectives: We aimed to more accurately assess the impact of donor smoke exposure on PGD and mortality using quantitative smoke exposure biomarkers. Methods: We performed a multicenter prospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients enrolled in the Lung Transplant Outcomes Group cohort between 2012 and 2018. PGD was defined as grade 3 at 48 or 72 hours after lung reperfusion. Donor smoking was defined using accepted thresholds of urinary biomarkers of nicotine exposure (cotinine) and tobacco-specific nitrosamine (4-[methylnitrosamino]-1-[3-pyridyl]-1-butanol [NNAL]) in addition to clinical history. The donor smoking-PGD association was assessed using logistic regression, and survival analysis was performed using inverse probability of exposure weighting according to smoking category. Measurements and Main Results: Active donor smoking prevalence varied by definition, with 34-43% based on urinary cotinine, 28% by urinary NNAL, and 37% by clinical documentation. The standardized risk of PGD associated with active donor smoking was higher across all definitions, with an absolute risk increase of 11.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 19.2%) by urinary cotinine, 5.7% (95% CI, -3.4% to 14.9%) by urinary NNAL, and 6.5% (95% CI, -2.8% to 15.8%) defined clinically. Donor smoking was not associated with differential post-lung transplant survival using any definition. Conclusions: Donor smoking associates with a modest increase in PGD risk but not with increased recipient mortality. Use of lungs from smokers is likely safe and may increase lung donor availability. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00552357).

Effect of donor smoking and substance use on post-lung transplant outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to determine effects of donor smoking and substance use on primary graft dysfunction, allograft function, and survival after lung transplant.

METHODS

From January 2007 to February 2020, 1366 lung transplants from 1291 donors were performed in 1352 recipients at Cleveland Clinic. Donor smoking and substance use history were extracted from the Uniform Donor Risk Assessment Interview and medical records. End points were post-transplant primary graft dysfunction, longitudinal forced expiratory volume in 1 second (% of predicted), and survival.

RESULTS

Among lung transplant recipients, 670 (49%) received an organ from a donor smoker, 163 (25%) received an organ from a donor with a 20 pack-year or more history (median pack-years 8), and 702 received an organ from a donor with substance use (51%). There was no association of donor smoking, pack-years, or substance use with primary graft dysfunction (P > .2). Post-transplant forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 74% at 1 year in donor nonsmoker recipients and 70% in donor smoker recipients (P = .0002), confined to double-lung transplant, where forced expiratory volume in 1 second was 77% in donor nonsmoker recipients and 73% in donor smoker recipients. Donor substance use was not associated with allograft function. Donor smoking was associated with 54% non-risk-adjusted 5-year survival versus 59% (P = .09) and greater pack-years with slightly worse risk-adjusted long-term survival (P = .01). Donor substance use was not associated with any outcome (P ≥ 8).

CONCLUSIONS

Among well-selected organs, lungs from smokers were associated with non-clinically important worse allograft outcomes without an inflection point for donor smoking pack-years. Substance use was not associated with worse allograft function. Given the paucity of organs, donor smoking or substance use alone should not preclude assessment for lung donation or transplant.

Outcomes following heart or bilateral-lung transplantation from donors who died of drug toxicity in British Columbia, Canada

INTRODUCTION

The illicit drug toxicity (overdose) crisis has worsened across Canada; between 2016 and 2021, more than 28,000 individuals have died of drug toxicity. Organ donation from persons who experience drug toxicity death (DTD) has increased in recent years. This study examines whether survival after heart or bilateral-lung transplantation differed by donor cause of death.

METHODS

We studied transplant recipients in British Columbia who received heart (N = 110) or bilateral-lung (N = 223) transplantation from deceased donors aged 12-70 years between 2013 and 2019. Transplant recipient survival was compared by donor cause of death from drug toxicity or other. Five-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of survival and 3-year inverse probability treatment weighted Cox proportional hazards models were conducted.

RESULTS

DTD donors made up 36% (40/110) of heart and 24% (54/223) of bilateral-lung transplantations. DTD donors were more likely to be young, white, and male. Unadjusted 5-year recipient survival was similar by donor cause of death (heart: 87% for DTD and 86% for non-DTD, p = .75; bilateral- lung: 80% for DTD and 76% for non-DTD, p = .65). Adjusted risk of mortality at 3-years post-transplant was similar between recipients of DTD and non-DTD donor heart (hazard ratio [HR]: .94, 95% confidence interval (CI): .22-4.07, p = .938) and bilateral-lung (HR: 1.06, 95% CI: .41-2.70, p = .908).

CONCLUSION

Recipient survival after heart or bilateral-lung transplantation from DTD donors and non-DTD donors was similar. Donation from DTD donors is safe and should be considered more broadly to increase organ donation.

Prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes Among Lung Transplant Recipients of Donors With Cocaine Use

INTRODUCTION

There is limited data regarding lung transplant (LT) outcomes among recipients of donors with a history of cocaine use. We sought to assess the burden of cocaine abuse among LT donors, describe their characteristics, and evaluate the association with post-transplant outcomes.

METHODS

From the United Network for Organ Sharing database, we included adult patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent LT between 1996 and 2014 (N = 20,106; mean age 53.7 ± 13 years; male: 57%). Study groups were divided based on the donor history of recent cocaine abuse (last 6 months). Donor and recipient characteristics were compared between the 2 groups. With 1-year survival as the primary endpoint, multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess for an independent association with the donor history of cocaine use.

RESULTS

The overall frequency of donors with any history of cocaine use was 10.9% (n = 2189), although less than half were current users (n = 1001, 4.98%). Unadjusted 1-year survival was worse among recipients of donors with current cocaine use, although it did not achieve statistical significance (84.4% vs 82.2%; odds ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval 0.99-1.38; P = .07). After adjusting for potential confounders, the current use of cocaine was not associated with 1-year survival (adjusted OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.95-1.18; P = .29).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant proportion of lung donors have a history of cocaine abuse. Although unadjusted early outcomes appear to worsen among recipients of active cocaine users, an independent association was not seen with 1-year survival. The current analysis supports the continued use of donors with a history of cocaine abuse, assuming they meet other criteria for organ quality.

Donor selection for lung transplant in Turkey: Is it necessary to wait for an ideal donor?

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the donor criteria used in lung transplantation in our clinic.

Methods

A total of 55 cadaveric donors who were accepted for lung transplantation in our clinic between December 2016 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed according to ideal donor criteria. The donors were divided into two groups as ideal and non-ideal ones according to their age, partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood, history of smoking, and ventilation day. Donor data, recipient characteristics and survival outcomes were evaluated.

Results

Of 55 donors accepted for lung transplantation, 24 (43.7%) were ideal and 31 (56.3%) were non-ideal donors. The 90-day mortality and one-year survival rates were not significantly different between the two groups. The 90-day mortality was 25% in the ideal group and 22.6% in the non-ideal group (p=0.834). The one-year survival rates after lung transplantation were 64.5% versus 70.6% in the ideal and non-ideal groups, respectively (p=0.444).

Conclusion

The whole clinical picture should be evaluated before accepting or rejecting donors for lung transplantation. The use of lung donors that do not meet the ideal criteria does not impair short- and mid-term results, compared to ideal lung donors. Strict implementation of donor criteria may prevent using suitable donors for lung transplantation. Use of non-ideal donors can reduce waiting list mortality.

Donor quality assessment and size match in lung transplantation

Careful donor quality assessment and size match can impact long-term survival in lung transplantation. With this article, we review the conceptual and practical aspects of the preoperative donor lung quality assessment and size matching.

Comparison of donor scores in bilateral lung transplantation-A large single-center analysis

Objectifying donor lung quality is difficult and currently there is no consensus. Several donor scoring systems have been proposed in recent years. They all lack large-scale external validation and widespread acceptance. A retrospective evaluation of 2201 donor lungs offered to the lung transplant program at the Medical University of Vienna between January 2010 and June 2018 was performed. Five different lung donor scores were calculated for each offer (Oto, ET, MALT, UMN-DLQI, and ODSS). Prediction of organ utilization, 1-year graft survival, and long-term outcome were analyzed for each score. 1049 organs were rejected at the initial offer (group I), 209 lungs declined after procurement (group II), and 841 lungs accepted and transplanted (group III). The Oto score was superior in predicting acceptance of the initial offer (AUC: 0.795; CI: 0.776-0.815) and actual donor utilization (AUC: 0.660; CI: 0.618-0.701). Prediction of 1-year graft survival was best using the MALT score, Oto score, and UMN-DLQI. Stratification of early outcome by MALT was significant for length of mechanical ventilation (LMV), PGD3 rates, ICU stay and hospital stay, and in-hospital-mortality, respectively. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest validation analysis comparing currently available donor scores. The Oto score was superior in predicting organ utilization, and MALT score and UMN-DLQI for predicting outcome after lung transplantation.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Evolving Concepts and Therapies

The primary factor that limits long-term survival after lung transplantation is chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). CLAD also impairs quality of life and increases the costs of medical care. Our understanding of CLAD continues to evolve. Consensus definitions of CLAD and the major CLAD phenotypes were recently updated and clarified, but it remains to be seen whether the current definitions will lead to advances in management or impact care. Understanding the potential differences in pathogenesis for each CLAD phenotype may lead to novel therapeutic strategies, including precision medicine. Recognition of CLAD risk factors may lead to earlier interventions to mitigate risk, or to avoid risk factors all together, to prevent the development of CLAD. Unfortunately, currently available therapies for CLAD are usually not effective. However, novel therapeutics aimed at both prevention and treatment are currently under investigation. We provide an overview of the updates to CLAD-related terminology, clinical phenotypes and their diagnosis, natural history, pathogenesis, and potential strategies to treat and prevent CLAD.

Bacterial Re-Colonization Occurs Early after Lung Transplantation in Cystic Fibrosis Patients

Most cystic fibrosis (CF) patients referred for lung transplantation are chronically infected with Gram-negative opportunistic pathogens. It is well known that chronic infections in CF patients have a significant impact on lung-function decline and survival before transplantation. The rate and timing of re-colonization after transplantation have been described, but the impact on survival after stratification of bacteria is not well elucidated. We did a single-center retrospective analysis of 99 consecutive CF patients who underwent lung transplantation since the beginning of the Copenhagen Lung Transplant program in 1992 until October 2014. Two patients were excluded due to re-transplantation. From the time of CF diagnosis, patients had monthly sputum cultures. After transplantation, CF-patients had bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage at 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after transplantation, as well as sputum samples if relevant. Selected culture results prior to and after transplantation were stored. We focused on colonization with the most frequent bacteria: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (SM), Achromobacter xylosoxidans (AX) and Burkholderia cepacia complex (BCC). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was used to identify clonality of bacterial isolates obtained before and after lung transplantation. Time to re-colonization was defined as the time from transplantation to the first positive culture with the same species. Seventy-three out of 97 (75%) had sufficient culture data for analyses with a median of 7 (1–91) cultures available before and after transplantation. Median colonization-free survival time was 23 days until the first positive culture after transplantation. After 2 years, 59 patients (81%) were re-colonized, 33 (48.5%) with PA, 7 (10.3%) with SM, 12 (17.6%) with AX, and 7 (10.3%) with BCC. No difference in survival was observed between the patients colonized within the first 2 years and those not colonized. Re-colonization of bacteria in the lower airways occurred at a median of 23 days after transplantation in our cohort. In our patient cohort, survival was not influenced by re-colonization or bacterial species.

Lung Ultrasound to Phenotype Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction in Lung Transplant Recipients. A Prospective Observational Study

Background: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) and restrictive allograft syndrome (RAS) are two distinct phenotypes of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) in lung transplant (LTx) recipients. Contrary to BOS, RAS can radiologically present with a pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE) pattern. This study investigates lung ultrasound (LUS) to identify potential surrogate markers of PPFE in order to distinguish CLAD phenotype RAS from BOS. Methods: A prospective cohort study performed at a National Lung Transplantation Center during June 2016 to December 2017. Patients were examined with LUS and high-resolution computed tomography of the thorax (HRCT). Results: Twenty-five CLAD patients (72% males, median age of 54 years) were included, corresponding to 19/6 BOS/RAS patients. LUS-identified pleural thickening was more pronounced in RAS vs. BOS patients (5.6 vs. 2.9 mm) compatible with PPFE on HRCT. LUS-identified pleural thickening as an indicator of PPFE in RAS patients’ upper lobes showed a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI; 54–100%), specificity of 100% (95% CI; 82–100%), PPV of 100% (95% CI; 54–100%), and NPV of 100% (95% CI; 82–100%). Conclusion: Apical pleural thickening detected by LUS and compatible with PPFE on HRCT separates RAS from BOS in patients with CLAD. We propose LUS as a supplementary tool for initial CLAD phenotyping.

Substance use and abuse in pediatric transplant recipients: What the transplant provider needs to know

Substance abuse is infrequently addressed during pre- and post-transplant care. However, the significant increase in the use of nicotine- and marijuana-containing products in the general and transplant adolescent population is concerning. In addition, alcohol use/abuse remains prevalent in the US population as it is highly accessible. Pediatric transplant providers should be prepared to screen for the use of any of these substances (eg, alcohol, nicotine, marijuana, cocaine, opiates, amphetamines) and to counsel them about the dangers of substance use and abuse including the unique dangers of the substances as a transplant recipient. Formal screening tools (in children as young as 9 years) should always be used as casual assessment of substance abuse has a high failure rate. This review summarizes the substances most commonly used in adolescent transplant recipients and the approach that transplant providers should take in order to prevent, decrease, or halt use in this patient population.

Impact of donor smoking history on post heart transplant outcomes: A propensity-matched analysis of ISHLT registry

PURPOSE

Smoking is a major public health issue, and its effect on cardiovascular outcomes is well established. This study evaluates the impact of donor smoking on heart transplant (HT) outcomes.

METHODS

HT recipients between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2016, with known donor smoking status were queried from the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) registry. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary endpoints were graft failure, acute rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy. We utilized propensity-score matching to identify cohorts of recipients with and without a history of donor smoking. Hazard ratios for post-transplant outcomes for the matched sample were estimated from separate Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Of 26 390 patients in the cohort, 18.9% had history of donor smoking. Donors with history of smoking were older, predominantly male and had higher incidence of diabetes, hypertension, cocaine use, and "high-risk" status. In propensity-matched analysis, recipients with a history of donor smoking had increased risk of death (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20) and higher risk of graft failure (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20).

CONCLUSION

Donor smoking was associated with increased mortality and higher incidence of graft failure following HT. Consideration of donor smoking history is warranted while evaluating donor hearts.

Dual Procurement of Lung and Heart Allografts Does Not Negatively Affect Lung Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The data that exists regarding multiorgan procurement outcomes is conflicted. Given the increasing demand for pulmonary allografts, it is critical to assess the impact of dual procurement on lung transplant recipient outcomes.

METHODS

The United Network for Organ Sharing transplant registry was queried for all first-time adult (age ≥18) lung transplant recipients between 2006 and 2018 and stratified by concurrent heart donor status. Multiorgan transplant recipients and recipients with missing survival time were excluded. Donors were excluded if they were donating after circulatory death, did not consent or were not approached for heart donation, the heart was recovered for nontransplant purposes, or the heart was recovered for transplant but not transplanted. Post-transplant survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

A total of 18,641 recipients met inclusion criteria, including 6230 (33.4%) in the nonheart donor group (NHD) and 12,409 (66.6%) in the heart donor group (HD). HD recipients demonstrated longer survival at 10 years posttransplant, with a median survival of 6.5 years as compared with 5.9 years in NHD recipients. On adjusted analysis, HD and NHD recipients demonstrated comparable survival (AHR 0.95, 95% CI 0.90-1.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant heart and lung procurement was not associated with worse survival. This finding encourages maximizing the number of organs procured from each donor, particularly in the setting of urgency-driven thoracic transplantation.

Clinical Outcomes of Lung Transplants From Donors With Unexpected Pulmonary Embolism

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is unexpectedly detected in some donor lungs during organ procurement for lung transplantation. Anecdotally, such lungs are usually implanted; however, the impact of this finding on recipient outcomes remains unclear. We hypothesized that incidentally detected donor PE is associated with adverse short-term and long-term outcomes among lung transplant recipients.

METHODS

We analyzed a prospectively maintained database of all lung donors procured by a single surgeon and transplanted at our institution between 2009 and 2018. A standardized approach was used for all procurements and included antegrade and retrograde flush. Pulmonary embolism was defined as macroscopic thrombus seen in the pulmonary artery during the donor procurement operation.

RESULTS

A total of 501 consecutive lung procurements were performed during the study period. The incidence of donor PE was 4.4% (22 of 501). No organs were discarded owing to PE. Donors with PE were similar to donors without PE in baseline characteristics and Pao₂. Recipients in the two groups were also similar. Pulmonary embolism was associated with a higher likelihood of acute cellular rejection grade 2 or more (10 of 22 [45.5%] vs 120 of 479 [25.1%], P = .03). Multivariable Cox modeling demonstrated an association between PE and the development of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (hazard ratio 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.23 to 3.30; P = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

Lungs from donors with incidentally detected PE may be associated with a higher incidence of recipient acute cellular rejection as well as reduced chronic lung allograft dysfunction-free survival. Surgeons must use caution when transplanting lungs with incidentally discovered PE. These preliminary findings warrant corroboration in larger data sets.

Impact of extended-criteria donor lungs according to preoperative recipient status and age in lung transplantation

Background

Organ donor shortage remains as one of the limiting factors for lung transplantation. Given the increase in waiting time, preoperative condition has worsened and affects surgical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate postoperative and long-term outcomes of lung transplantation in extended-criteria donor (ECD) lungs compared with standard-criteria donor (SCD) lungs.

Methods

A total of 246 patients who had undergone double-lung transplantation during the study period were enrolled. SCD was defined based on the following characteristics age <55 years, <20 pack-years smoking history, and PaO₂/fraction of O₂ ratio >300 mmHg. Organ donors who do not fulfill these criteria were classified as ECD. Pre- and postoperative data for outcomes and survival data were analyzed.

Results

ECD showed significant association with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning in the operating room (hazard ratio [HR], 0.531; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.291–0.970; P=0.039) considering recipient’s age and status at operation. The ECD group showed comparable survival rate with the SCD group (HR, 1.413; 95% CI, 0.885–2.255; P=0.148), with adjustment of other factors. However, when the recipient had Korean Network for Organ Sharing (KONOS) status 0 at the time of transplantation (HR, 1.662; 95% CI, 1.025–2.568; P=0.039), G3 primary graft dysfunction at 72 hours after surgery (HR, 2.508; 95% CI, 1.416–4.440; P=0.002) was a risk factor that decreased survival.

Conclusions

The outcome of ECD is not inferior to that of SCD. Therefore, ECD lung should be considered a potential donor organ following active donor management rather than a contraindication of transplantation in highly selected recipients.

Review 1: Lung transplant-from donor selection to graft preparation

For various end-stage lung diseases, lung transplantation remains one of the only viable treatment options. While the demand for lung transplantation has steadily risen over the last few decades, the availability of donor grafts is limited, which have resulted in progressively longer waiting lists. In the early years of lung transplantation, only the 'ideal' donor grafts are considered for transplantation. Due to the donor shortages, there is ongoing discussion about the safe use of 'suboptimal' grafts to expand the donor pool. In this review, we will discuss the considerations around donor selection, donor-recipient matching, graft preparation and graft optimisation.

Variation in Time to Peak Values for Different Lung Function Parameters After Double Lung Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Establishment of baseline values for forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), or total lung capacity (TLC) is required when diagnosing and phenotyping chronic lung allograft dysfunction after lung transplant. It is generally accepted that the baseline (peak) values of these parameters occur simultaneously, but this assumption has not been substantiated for TLC.

METHODS

All lung function measurements in all double lung transplant recipients from a single center in the period from 1992-2014 were included. Time to baseline FEV₁ was assessed according to standards from the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, and time to peak FVC, TLC, and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 288 double lung transplants surviving more than 3 months after transplant were included. Baseline FEV₁ occurred at a median of 0.77 years post transplant and was statistically different from median times to the peak FVC (1.02 years), to peak TLC (1.37 years), and to peak diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide 1.04 years post transplant (all log-rank P < .001). At the time of baseline FEV1, FVC, and TLC were at a mean of 96% and 95% of their peak values, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The peak lung function is reached at different time points for different parameters post transplant with FEV₁ baseline occurring first. For most patients values of FVC and TLC obtained at time for baseline FEV₁ is a good estimate of peak values, but in a small percentage of patients this procedure may jeopardize phenotyping of chronic lung allograft dysfunction based solely on lung function parameters.

Effects of drug abuse, smoking and alcohol on donor hearts and lungs

Potential heart and lung donors with a history of illicit drugs and/or smoking and alcohol are frequently offered, though there is no clear guidance on when it is safe to use these organs. A review of the literature on effects of drugs, alcohol and smoking on donor outcomes, and the effects of these on the intact heart and lung was undertaken. There has been a marked increase in deaths from opioid abuse in many developed countries, though recent evidence suggests that outcomes after cardiothoracic transplantation are equivalent to nonopioid donor causes of death. For donor smoking, there is an increased risk with lung transplantation; however, that risk is less when compared to further waiting on the transplant list for a nonsmoking alternative. Heavy alcohol consumption does not adversely affect heart transplantation, and there is no clear evidence of adverse outcomes after lung transplantation. There are no overall effects of cannabis or cocaine on survival after heart or lung transplantation. In all these cases, careful donor assessment can establish if a particular organ can be used. In most cases, use of drugs requires careful assessment, but is not in of itself a contraindication to cardiothoracic transplantation.

Effects of Smoking on Solid Organ Transplantation Outcomes

Tobacco smoking is the leading preventable cause of death worldwide. Both donor and recipient smoking have been shown to increase graft loss and mortality in solid organ transplant recipients in many studies. Only in lung transplants is smoking a universal contraindication to transplantation. Transplant centers implement different policies regarding smoking recipients and allografts from smoking donors. Due to scarcity of available allografts, the risks of smoking have to be weighed against the risks of a longer transplant waitlist period. Although transplant centers implement different strategies to encourage smoking cessation pre- and post-transplant, not many studies have been published that validate the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions in this vulnerable population. This article summarizes the results of studies investigating prevalence, impact on outcomes, and cessationinterventions for smoking in the transplant population. We report herein a review of the elevated risks of infection, malignancy, graft loss, cardiovascular events, and mortality in solid organ transplant populations.

Solid organ transplantation in older adults. Infectious and other age-related considerations

In the U.S., older adults aged 65 or above comprise nearly one quarter of the solid organ transplant (SOT) waitlists, and the number of transplants performed in this age group continues to increase. There are no specific guidelines for the assessment and follow up of the older SOT candidate or recipient. Older adults are at increased risk of infectious complications after SOT. Despite these complications and even with the use of suboptimal donors, overall outcomes are favorable. We provide an overview to specific consideration as they relate to the older SOT candidate and recipient.