1
|
Garland EC, Corkeron P, Noad MJ, Abrahms B, Allen JA, Constantine R, Rendell L, Sousa-Lima RS, Stafford KM, Carroll EL. Culture and conservation in baleen whales. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2025; 380:20240133. [PMID: 40308135 PMCID: PMC12044387 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 11/28/2024] [Accepted: 12/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Culture, defined as information or behaviours shared within a population and acquired from conspecifics through social learning, acts as a second inheritance system which has important implications for species' ecology and evolution. Understanding the influence of social learning and culture in animals' lives is essential to planning and predicting outcomes of conservation actions. Culture plays a key role in cetaceans' lives, and some of the best evidence for social learning has come from baleen whales (Mysticetes). The Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), an international treaty operating under the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), has recently integrated animal culture into their conservation initiatives. An essential first step in such a conservation framework is to identify key indicators of social learning in well-studied species, which could be applied to other more elusive species. Here, as part of the UNEP CMS Expert Group on Animal Culture and Social Complexity, we first evaluate key evidence for social learning and culture in baleen whales through several case studies. We then suggest key indicators by behavioural context to assist in identifying potential cases of social learning in more elusive species generating a practical guide for future conservation assessment and management.This article is part of the theme issue 'Animal culture: conservation in a changing world'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen C. Garland
- Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Peter Corkeron
- Centre for Planetary Health and Food Security, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - Michael J. Noad
- Cetacean Ecology and Acoustics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Briana Abrahms
- Center for Ecosystem Sentinels, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jenny A. Allen
- Bio-Telemetry and Behavioral Ecology Laboratory, Institute of Marine Science, Long Marine Laboratory, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Southern Ocean Persistent Organic Pollutants Programs (SOPOPP), Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia
| | - Rochelle Constantine
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland – Waipapa Taumata Rau, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Luke Rendell
- Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK
| | - Renata S. Sousa-Lima
- Graduate Program of Psychobiology and Behavior, Biosciences Center, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
- Laboratory of Bioacoustics, Department of Physiology and Behavior, Biosciences Center, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
| | | | - Emma L. Carroll
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland – Waipapa Taumata Rau, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brakes P, Dall SRX, Townley S. Cultural processes and demography: implications for conservation and beyond. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2025; 380:20240145. [PMID: 40308132 PMCID: PMC12044369 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2024.0145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2024] [Revised: 12/03/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
Social transmission of cultural variants in wildlife can cause population level effects with implications for conservation science, policy and practice. Social learning and animal culture can generate resilience in populations through the spread of adaptive behaviour but may also generate vulnerabilities. Distilling comprehensive management advice in this field remains challenging. Animal culture is important for defining 'units to conserve', managing human-wildlife interactions, reintroductions or translocations, and influences evolutionary change. However, the population level effects of cultural processes remain poorly understood. Given the breadth of issues for which cultural processes inform conservation, it is timely to consider the underlying processes in more detail. We consider the coupling of cultural processes and population dynamics to explore the conditions under which social learning can tip a declining population into growth. Simulations on a model system of two interacting cultural units are used to explore the tensions between the coupled dynamics of cultural and demographic processes. We show that even under a simple learning bias, the population level outcomes are complex. In concert with urgent targeted conservation action, we highlight the need to develop deeper process-based understanding in this field, to yield fundamental principles applicable to a broader range of encultured species.This article is part of the theme issue 'Animal culture: conservation in a changing world'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa Brakes
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Biosciences, University of Exeter Faculty of Environment Science and Economy, PenrynTR10 9FE, UK
- Cetacean Ecology Research Group, School of Natural Sciences, Massey University, Auckland0632, New Zealand
| | - Sasha R. X. Dall
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Biosciences, University of Exeter Faculty of Environment Science and Economy, PenrynTR10 9FE, UK
| | - Stuart Townley
- Centre for Environmental Mathematics, University of Exeter Faculty of Environment Science and Economy, PenrynTR10 9FE, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Devarajan K, Fidino M, Farris ZJ, Adalsteinsson SA, Andrade-Ponce G, Angstmann JL, Anthonysamy W, Aquino J, Asefa A, Avila B, Bailey LL, de Sousa Barbosa LM, de Frias Barreto M, Barton O, Bates CE, Beltrão MG, Bird T, Biro EG, Bisi F, Bohórquez D, Boyce M, Brashares JS, Bullington G, Burns P, Burr J, Butler AR, Calhoun KL, Cao TT, Casado N, Cepeda-Duque JC, Cepek JD, Chiarello AG, Collins M, Cordeiro-Estrela P, Costa S, Cremonesi G, Cristescu B, Cruz P, de Albuquerque ACF, De Angelo C, de Campos CB, de Sena LMM, Di Bitetti M, de Matos Dias D, Diefenbach D, Doherty TS, dos Santos TP, Duarte GT, Eppley TM, Erb J, Esteves CF, Evans B, Falcão MLM, Fernandes-Ferreira H, Fieberg JR, de Souza Filho LCF, Fisher J, Fortin MJ, Gale GA, Gallo T, Ganoe LS, Garcia-Anleu R, Gaynor KM, Gelmi-Candusso TA, Gichuru PN, Gomez Q, Green AM, Guimarães LN, Haight JD, Harris LR, Hawn ZD, Heiman J, Hoang HQ, Huebner S, Iannarilli F, Iezzi ME, Ivan JS, Jaspers KJ, Jordan MJ, Kamilar J, Kane M, Karimi MH, Kelly M, Kohl MT, Kuvlesky WP, Ladle A, Larson RN, Le QT, Le D, Le VS, Lehrer EW, Lendrum PE, Lewis J, Link A, Lizcano DJ, Lombardi JV, Long R, López-Tello E, Lugarini C, Lugo D, et alDevarajan K, Fidino M, Farris ZJ, Adalsteinsson SA, Andrade-Ponce G, Angstmann JL, Anthonysamy W, Aquino J, Asefa A, Avila B, Bailey LL, de Sousa Barbosa LM, de Frias Barreto M, Barton O, Bates CE, Beltrão MG, Bird T, Biro EG, Bisi F, Bohórquez D, Boyce M, Brashares JS, Bullington G, Burns P, Burr J, Butler AR, Calhoun KL, Cao TT, Casado N, Cepeda-Duque JC, Cepek JD, Chiarello AG, Collins M, Cordeiro-Estrela P, Costa S, Cremonesi G, Cristescu B, Cruz P, de Albuquerque ACF, De Angelo C, de Campos CB, de Sena LMM, Di Bitetti M, de Matos Dias D, Diefenbach D, Doherty TS, dos Santos TP, Duarte GT, Eppley TM, Erb J, Esteves CF, Evans B, Falcão MLM, Fernandes-Ferreira H, Fieberg JR, de Souza Filho LCF, Fisher J, Fortin MJ, Gale GA, Gallo T, Ganoe LS, Garcia-Anleu R, Gaynor KM, Gelmi-Candusso TA, Gichuru PN, Gomez Q, Green AM, Guimarães LN, Haight JD, Harris LR, Hawn ZD, Heiman J, Hoang HQ, Huebner S, Iannarilli F, Iezzi ME, Ivan JS, Jaspers KJ, Jordan MJ, Kamilar J, Kane M, Karimi MH, Kelly M, Kohl MT, Kuvlesky WP, Ladle A, Larson RN, Le QT, Le D, Le VS, Lehrer EW, Lendrum PE, Lewis J, Link A, Lizcano DJ, Lombardi JV, Long R, López-Tello E, Lugarini C, Lugo D, MacKay P, Madadi M, Magalhães RA, Magle SB, Maia LHRD, Mandujano S, Marchenkova T, Marinho PH, Marker L, Pardo JM, Martinoli A, Massara RL, Masseloux J, Matiukhina D, Mayer A, Mazariegos L, McClung MR, McInturff A, McPhail D, Mertl A, Middaugh CR, Miller D, Mills D, Miquelle D, Miritis V, Moll RJ, Molnár P, Montgomery RA, Morelli TL, Mortelliti A, Mueller RI, Mukhacheva AS, Mullen K, Murphy A, Nepomuceno V, Ngoprasert D, Nguyen A, Van Nguyen T, Nguyen VT, Quang HAN, Nipko R, Nobre ACC, Northrup J, Owen MA, Paglia AP, Palmer MS, Palomo-Munoz G, Pardo LE, Parks C, de Oliveira Paschoal AM, Patterson B, Paviolo A, Pejchar L, Pendergast ME, Perotto-Baldivieso HL, Petrov T, Poisson MKP, Polli DJ, Pourmirzai M, Reebin A, Remine KR, Rich L, Richardson CS, Robino F, Rocha DG, Rocha FL, Rodrigues FHG, Rohnke AT, Ryan TJ, Salsbury CM, Sander HA, da Cruz Santos-Cavalcante NM, Sekercioglu CH, Seryodkin I, Setiawan DH, Shadloo S, Shahhosseini M, Shannon G, Shier CJ, Smith GB, Snyder T, Sollmann R, Sparks KL, Sribuarod K, St. Clair CC, Stankowich T, Steinmetz R, Stevenson CJ, Sunarto Sunarto, Surasinghe TD, Sutyrina SV, Swaisgood RR, Taktehrani A, Thapa K, Thorton M, Tilker A, Tobler MW, Tran VB, Tucker J, Van Horn RC, Vargas-Soto JS, Velásquez-C KL, Venter J, Venticinque EM, Verschueren S, Wampole E, Watchorn DJ, Wearn OR, Weiss KC, Welschen A, Widodo FA, Williamson J, Wilting A, Wittemyer G, Zavaleta A, Zellmer AJ, Gerber BD. When the wild things are: Defining mammalian diel activity and plasticity. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2025; 11:eado3843. [PMID: 40009684 PMCID: PMC11864191 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.ado3843] [Show More Authors] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/23/2025] [Indexed: 02/28/2025]
Abstract
Circadian rhythms are a mechanism by which species adapt to environmental variability and fundamental to understanding species behavior. However, we lack data and a standardized framework to accurately assess and compare temporal activity for species during rapid ecological change. Through a global network representing 38 countries, we leveraged 8.9 million mammalian observations to create a library of 14,587 standardized diel activity estimates for 445 species. We found that less than half the species' estimates were in agreement with diel classifications from the reference literature and that species commonly used more than one diel classification. Species diel activity was highly plastic when exposed to anthropogenic change. Furthermore, body size and distributional extent were strongly associated with whether a species is diurnal or nocturnal. Our findings provide essential knowledge of species behavior in an era of rapid global change and suggest the need for a new, quantitative framework that defines diel activity logically and consistently while capturing species plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kadambari Devarajan
- Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Mason Fidino
- Conservation and Science Department, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Zach J. Farris
- Department of Public Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC, USA
| | - Solny A. Adalsteinsson
- Tyson Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, 6750 Tyson Valley Road, Eureka, MO, USA
| | | | - Julia L. Angstmann
- Center for Urban Ecology and Sustainability, Butler University, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Whitney Anthonysamy
- Department of Basic Sciences, University of Health Sciences and Pharmacy, 1 Pharmacy Place, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jesica Aquino
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia” (MACN-CONICET), Av. Ángel Gallardo 490, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Addisu Asefa
- Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Authority, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Belen Avila
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra, Biodiversidad y Ambiente (ICBIA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC)–CONICET, Ruta Nacional 36 Km 601, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Larissa L. Bailey
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | | | - Marcela de Frias Barreto
- Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Owain Barton
- School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2DG, UK
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Canada
| | - Chloe E. Bates
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, 700 University Blvd, Kingsville, TX, USA
| | | | - Tori Bird
- Utah’s Hogle Zoo, 2600 Sunnyside Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Elizabeth G. Biro
- Tyson Research Center, Washington University in St. Louis, 6750 Tyson Valley Road, Eureka, MO, USA
| | - Francesco Bisi
- Environment Analysis and Management Unit–Guido Tosi Research Group, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via J. H. Dunant, 3, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Daniel Bohórquez
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW, Australia
| | - Mark Boyce
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Canada
| | - Justin S. Brashares
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California Berkeley, 137 Mulford #3114, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Grace Bullington
- Environmental and Life Sciences, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
| | - Phoebe Burns
- Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria, Parkville VIC 3053, Australia
| | - Jessica Burr
- Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Andrew R. Butler
- Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH, USA
| | - Kendall L. Calhoun
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Tien Trung Cao
- Institute for Ecology and Conservation of Nature, Vinh University, Vinh City, Vietnam
| | - Natalia Casado
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
| | - Juan Camilo Cepeda-Duque
- Tiger Cats Conservation Initiative, Finca Las Mejoras, Vereda La Rivera Baja, Comuna 10, Dosquebradas, Colombia
| | | | - Adriano Garcia Chiarello
- Departamento de Biologia, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil
| | - Merri Collins
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Pedro Cordeiro-Estrela
- Laboratório de Mamíferos, Coleção de Mamíferos da UFPB, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Jardim Universitário, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
| | - Sebastian Costa
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM)–CONICET, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
| | | | - Bogdan Cristescu
- Cheetah Conservation Fund, Otjiwarongo, Namibia
- Namibia University of Science and Technology, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Paula Cruz
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM)–CONICET, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UNaM, Bertoni 124, Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina
| | - Anna Carolina Figueiredo de Albuquerque
- Laboratório de Mamíferos, Coleção de Mamíferos da UFPB, Departamento de Sistemática e Ecologia, Centro de Ciências Exatas e da Natureza, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Jardim Universitário, João Pessoa, PB, Brazil
- Instituto Federal da Paraíba–IFPB, Jardim Camboinha, Cabedelo, PB, Brazil
| | - Carlos De Angelo
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Ciencias de la Tierra, Biodiversidad y Ambiente (ICBIA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (UNRC)–CONICET, Ruta Nacional 36 Km 601, Río Cuarto, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Cláudia Bueno de Campos
- Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade–Núcleo de Gestão Integrada, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil
- The Institute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Av. Horácio Neto, 1030 - Parque Edmundo Zanoni, Atibaia, SP, Brazil
| | - Liana Mara Mendes de Sena
- Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Mario Di Bitetti
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM)–CONICET, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, UNaM, Bertoni 124, Eldorado, Misiones, Argentina
| | - Douglas de Matos Dias
- Tiger Cats Conservation Initiative, Finca Las Mejoras, Vereda La Rivera Baja, Comuna 10, Dosquebradas, Colombia
- SETEG Soluções Ambientais, Rua Paulo Firmeza 1349, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Duane Diefenbach
- US Geological Survey, Pennsylvania Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - Tim S. Doherty
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW, Australia
- Biodiversity and Conservation Science, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Woodvale, WA, Australia
| | - Thais P. dos Santos
- Curso de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco (UNIVASF), Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil
| | - Gabriela Teixeira Duarte
- International Institute for Sustainability, Estrada Dona Castorina, 124 Horto, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 22460-320, Brazil
| | - Timothy M. Eppley
- Conservation Science and Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, USA
- Department of Anthropology, Portland State University, Portland, OR, USA
- Wildlife Madagascar, Antananarivo, Madagascar
| | - John Erb
- Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Grand Rapids, MN, USA
| | - Carolina Franco Esteves
- The Institute for the Conservation of Neotropical Carnivores, Av. Horácio Neto, 1030 - Parque Edmundo Zanoni, Atibaia, SP, Brazil
| | - Bryn Evans
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME, USA
| | - Maria L. M. Falcão
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
| | - Hugo Fernandes-Ferreira
- Laboratório de Conservação de Vertebrados Terrestres (Converte), Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Quixadá, Ceará, Brazil
- SETEG Soluções Ambientais, Rua Paulo Firmeza 1349, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Sistemática, Uso e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil
| | - John R. Fieberg
- Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
| | | | - Jason Fisher
- School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria British Columbia V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | - Marie-Josee Fortin
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - George A. Gale
- Conservation Ecology Program and School of Bioresources and Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, 10150, Thailand
| | - Travis Gallo
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Laken S. Ganoe
- Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Rony Garcia-Anleu
- Wildlife Conservation Society–Guatemala Program, Avenida 15 de Marzo, Casa #3, Ciudad de Flores, Petén 17001, Guatemala
| | - Kaitlyn M. Gaynor
- Departments of Zoology and Botany, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z, Canada
| | - Tiziana A. Gelmi-Candusso
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Phillys N. Gichuru
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Quimey Gomez
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM)–CONICET, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
| | - Austin M. Green
- Science Research Initiative, University of Utah, 1390 Presidents’ Circle, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Luiza Neves Guimarães
- Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Jeffrey D. Haight
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, 427 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ, USA
| | - Lavendar R. Harris
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E Green Street, Athens, GA, USA
| | - Zachary D. Hawn
- Point Defiance Zoo and Aquarium, 5400 North Pearl Street, Tacoma, WA, USA
| | - Jordan Heiman
- Wildlife Biology Department, University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive, Missoula, MT, USA
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 East Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, MT, USA
| | | | - Sarah Huebner
- Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota Lion Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Fabiola Iannarilli
- Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - María Eugenia Iezzi
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM)–CONICET, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Department, University of Florida, 110 Newins-Zielger Hall, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Jacob S. Ivan
- Colorado Parks and Wildlife, 317 W. Prospect Rd., Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | | | - Mark J. Jordan
- Department of Biology, Seattle University, 901 12th Ave., Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jason Kamilar
- Department of Anthropology and Graduate Program in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Mamadou Kane
- Direction des Parcs Nationaux, MEDD, Route des Pères Maristes, Dakar, Senegal
| | | | - Marcella Kelly
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Michel T. Kohl
- Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 180 E Green Street, Athens, GA, USA
| | - William P. Kuvlesky
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, 700 University Blvd, Kingsville, TX, USA
| | - Andrew Ladle
- School of Environmental Studies, University of Victoria, PO Box 1700 STN CSC, Victoria British Columbia V8W 2Y2, Canada
| | - Rachel N. Larson
- Department of Geographical and Sustainability Sciences, University of Iowa, 316 Jessup Hall, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Quy Tan Le
- Southern Institute of Ecology, Institute of Applied Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 1D TL29 Thanh Loc Ward, District 12, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam
| | - Duy Le
- Southern Institute of Ecology, Institute of Applied Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 1D TL29 Thanh Loc Ward, District 12, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam
| | - Van Son Le
- Bidoup Nui Ba National Park, Lam Dong, Vietnam
| | | | - Patrick E. Lendrum
- World Wildlife Fund–Northern Great Plains Program, 13 S. Willson Avenue, Bozeman, MT, USA
| | - Jesse Lewis
- College of Integrative Sciences and Arts, Arizona State University, 6073 Backus Mall, Mesa, AZ, USA
| | - Andrés Link
- Departamento de Ciencias Biológicas, Laboratorio de Ecología de Bosques Tropicales y Primatología, Universidad de los Andes, Cra 1#18a-12, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Diego J. Lizcano
- Caipora Foundation, Transversal 8 #9-55. T6, Cajicá, Cundinamarca, Colombia
| | - Jason V. Lombardi
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, 700 University Blvd, Kingsville, TX, USA
- Wildlife Health Laboratory, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Rancho Cordova, CA, USA
| | - Robert Long
- Woodland Park Zoo, 5500 Phinney Ave. N, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Eva López-Tello
- Red de Biología y Conservación de Vertebrados, Instituto de Ecología A. C. Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - Camile Lugarini
- Centro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação de Aves Silvestres (CEMAVE), Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade (ICMBio), Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil
| | - David Lugo
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Paula MacKay
- Woodland Park Zoo, 5500 Phinney Ave. N, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Rodolfo Assis Magalhães
- Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Seth B. Magle
- Conservation and Science Department, Lincoln Park Zoo, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Ludmila Hufnagel Regis Diniz Maia
- Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Salvador Mandujano
- Red de Biología y Conservación de Vertebrados, Instituto de Ecología A. C. Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - Taisiia Marchenkova
- Land of the Leopard National Park, 690068, 00 let Vladivostoku, Ave., 127, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia
| | - Paulo Henrique Marinho
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
| | | | - Julia Martinez Pardo
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM)–CONICET, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
| | - Adriano Martinoli
- Environment Analysis and Management Unit–Guido Tosi Research Group, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Via J. H. Dunant, 3, 21100 Varese, Italy
| | - Rodrigo Lima Massara
- Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
- Instituto SerraDiCal de Pesquisa e Conservação, Rua José Hemetério de Andrade, 570, Buritis, Belo Horizonte, MG 30493-180, Brazil
| | - Juliana Masseloux
- Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | - Dina Matiukhina
- Land of the Leopard National Park, 690068, 00 let Vladivostoku, Ave., 127, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia
| | - Amy Mayer
- Department of Natural Resources Science, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA
| | | | - Maureen R. McClung
- Department of Biology and Health Sciences, Hendrix College, Conway, AR, USA
| | - Alex McInturff
- US Geological Survey, Washington Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, School of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Darby McPhail
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Amy Mertl
- Deptartment of Natural Science and Mathematics, Lesley University, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Christopher R. Middaugh
- Research Division, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, 2 Natural Resources Drive, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - David Miller
- Department of Ecosystem Science and Management, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
| | - David Mills
- Panthera, 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY, USA
| | - Dale Miquelle
- Wildlife Conservation Society, 2300 Southern Boulevard, the Bronx, New York, NY, USA
| | - Vivianna Miritis
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camperdown NSW, Australia
| | - Remington J. Moll
- Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH, USA
| | - Péter Molnár
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Department, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert A. Montgomery
- Department of Biology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK
| | - Toni Lyn Morelli
- US Geological Survey Northeast Climate Adaptation Science Center, Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Alessio Mortelliti
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Conservation Biology, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME, USA
- Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Edificio M, Via Licio Giorgieri 10, 34127 Trieste, Italy
| | - Rachael I. Mueller
- Northwest Trek Wildlife Park, 11610 Trek Drive East, Eatonville, WA, USA
| | | | - Kayleigh Mullen
- Utah’s Hogle Zoo, 2600 Sunnyside Avenue, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Asia Murphy
- Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Vance Nepomuceno
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Dusit Ngoprasert
- Conservation Ecology Program and School of Bioresources and Technology, King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok, 10150, Thailand
| | - An Nguyen
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
- Re:wild, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Thanh Van Nguyen
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
- Re:wild, Austin, TX, USA
- Vietnam National University–Central Institute for Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | | | | | - Rob Nipko
- Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA
| | - Ana Clarissa Costa Nobre
- Laboratório de Conservação de Vertebrados Terrestres (Converte), Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Quixadá, Ceará, Brazil
| | - Joseph Northrup
- Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry, Trent University, 2140 East Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
| | - Megan A. Owen
- Conservation Science and Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, USA
| | - Adriano Pereira Paglia
- Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Meredith S. Palmer
- Fauna and Flora International, The David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ, UK
| | - Gabriela Palomo-Munoz
- Department of Environmental Science and Technology, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Lain E. Pardo
- Panthera, 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Conservation Management, Faculty of Science, Nelson Mandela University, George, 6530, South Africa
| | - Chrystina Parks
- ROAM Africa Conservation, 16 Water Street, Williamstown, MA, USA
| | - Ana Maria de Oliveira Paschoal
- Laboratório de Ecologia e Conservação, Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
- Instituto SerraDiCal de Pesquisa e Conservação, Rua José Hemetério de Andrade, 570, Buritis, Belo Horizonte, MG 30493-180, Brazil
| | - Brent Patterson
- Ontario Ministry of Northern Development, Mines, Natural Resources and Forestry, Trent University, 2140 East Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
| | - Agustin Paviolo
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM)–CONICET, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
| | - Liba Pejchar
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Mary E. Pendergast
- Sageland Collaborative, 824 South 400 West, Suite B119, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Humberto L. Perotto-Baldivieso
- Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Texas A&M University-Kingsville, 700 University Blvd, Kingsville, TX, USA
- Department of Rangeland, Wildlife and Fisheries Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| | - Timofei Petrov
- Land of the Leopard National Park, 690068, 00 let Vladivostoku, Ave., 127, Vladivostok, Primorsky Krai, Russia
| | - Mairi K. P. Poisson
- Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire, 56 College Road, Durham, NH, USA
| | - Daiana Jeronimo Polli
- São Paulo State University, Av. 24 A, 1515 - Jardim Bela Vista, Rio Claro, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - Lindsey Rich
- California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | | | - Facundo Robino
- Asociación Civil Centro de Investigaciones del Bosque Atlántico, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
- Instituto de Biología Subtropical (IBS), Universidad Nacional de Misiones (UNaM)–CONICET, Bertoni 85, Puerto Iguazú, Misiones, Argentina
| | - Daniel G. Rocha
- Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
- Department of Biology, Southern Nazarene University, Bethany, OK, USA
| | - Fabiana Lopes Rocha
- IUCN SSC Center for Species Survival Brazil, Foz do Iguaçu, Paraná, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Biológicas–PPGCB, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil
| | - Flávio Henrique Guimarães Rodrigues
- Programa de Pós- graduação em Ecologia, Conservação e Manejo da Vida Silvestre, Departamento de Genética, Ecologia e Evolução, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Avenida Antonio Carlos, 6627, Belo Horizonte, MG 31270-901, Brazil
| | - Adam T. Rohnke
- Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Central MS Research and Extension Center, 1320 Seven Springs Rd, Raymond, MS, USA
| | - Travis J. Ryan
- Center for Urban Ecology and Sustainability, Butler University, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Butler University, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Carmen M. Salsbury
- Center for Urban Ecology and Sustainability, Butler University, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Department of Biological Sciences, Butler University, 4600 Sunset Avenue, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Heather A. Sander
- Department of Geographical and Sustainability Sciences, University of Iowa, 316 Jessup Hall, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Cagan H. Sekercioglu
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Koc University, Istanbul, Türkiye
- KuzeyDoğa Derneği, Istasyon Mahallesi, Ismail Aytemiz Caddesi, 36200 Kars, Türkiye
| | - Ivan Seryodkin
- Pacific Geographical Institute, Far-Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia
| | - Dede Hendra Setiawan
- World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Indonesia, Central Sumatra, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
| | | | | | - Graeme Shannon
- School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2DG, UK
| | - Catherine J. Shier
- Edmonton Valley Zoo, City of Edmonton, Saito Centre, 3315 Buena Vista Road, Edmonton Alberta, T5R 5R1, Canada
| | - G. Bradley Smith
- USDA Forest Service, Northern Regional Office, 26 Fort Missoula Rd, Missoula, MT, USA
| | - Tom Snyder
- Seneca Park Zoo Society, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Rahel Sollmann
- Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation, University of California–Davis, Davis, CA, USA
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
| | - Kimberly L. Sparks
- Research Division, Arkansas Game and Fish Commission, 2 Natural Resources Drive, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Kriangsak Sribuarod
- Khlong Saeng Wildlife Research Station, Department of National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Paholyotin Road, Chatuchak, Bangkok 10110, Thailand
| | - Colleen C. St. Clair
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. Canada
| | - Theodore Stankowich
- Department of Biological Sciences, California State University Long Beach, 1250 Bellflower Blvd, Long Beach, CA, USA
| | - Robert Steinmetz
- World Wildlife Fund Thailand, Pisit Building, 11 Pradiphat Soi 10 Pradiphat Road, Phayathai, 10400, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Sunarto Sunarto
- World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Indonesia, Central Sumatra, Pekanbaru, Indonesia
| | - Thilina D. Surasinghe
- Department of Biological Sciences, Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, MA, USA
| | | | - Ronald R. Swaisgood
- Conservation Science and Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, USA
| | | | - Kanchan Thapa
- World Wildlife Fund (WWF) Nepal, Kathmandu, Bagmati Province, Nepal
| | | | - Andrew Tilker
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
- Re:wild, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Mathias W. Tobler
- Conservation Science and Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, USA
| | - Van Bang Tran
- Southern Institute of Ecology, Institute of Applied Materials Science, Vietnam Academy of Science and Technology, 1D TL29 Thanh Loc Ward, District 12, Ho Chi Minh City, 700000, Vietnam
| | - Jody Tucker
- USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 800 East Beckwith Avenue, Missoula, MT, USA
| | - Russell C. Van Horn
- Conservation Science and Wildlife Health, San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance, Escondido, CA, USA
| | - Juan S. Vargas-Soto
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toronto Scarborough, 1265 Military Trail, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Jan Venter
- Department of Conservation Management, Faculty of Science, Nelson Mandela University, George, 6530, South Africa
| | - Eduardo M. Venticinque
- Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, Brazil
| | - Stijn Verschueren
- Cheetah Conservation Fund, Otjiwarongo, Namibia
- University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Erin Wampole
- Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA, USA
| | - Darcy J Watchorn
- Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria, Parkville VIC 3053, Australia
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences (Burwood Campus), Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Oliver R. Wearn
- Fauna and Flora International–Vietnam Programme, 118 Tu Hoa, Tay Ho, Hanoi, Vietnam
- Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent’s Park, London, NW1 4RY, UK
| | - Katherine C.B. Weiss
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, 427 E. Tyler Mall, Tempe, AZ, USA
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, Marist College, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA
| | - Alejandro Welschen
- Instituto de ecología, genética y evolución de Buenos Aires. Universidad de Buenos Aires, CONICET–UBA, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Jacque Williamson
- Wildlife Habitat Council, 9466 Georgia Ave. PMB 2115, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Andreas Wilting
- Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany
| | - George Wittemyer
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| | - Arturo Zavaleta
- Posgrado, Instituto de Ecología A. C. Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
| | - Amanda J. Zellmer
- Department of Biology, Occidental College, 1600 Campus Rd., Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Arroyos and Foothills Conservancy, PO Box 1, Pasadena, CA, USA
| | - Brian D. Gerber
- Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Conservation Biology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA
- US Geological Survey, Colorado Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Fort Collins, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Biagiotti Barchiesi MC, Garcia GO, Castano MV, Biondi LM. Neophobia and exploration behavior in urban gulls: The Kelp Gulls (Larus dominicanus) as a study case. Behav Processes 2025; 225:105147. [PMID: 39800087 DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2025.105147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 01/08/2025] [Accepted: 01/09/2025] [Indexed: 01/15/2025]
Abstract
Neophobia and exploratory behavior are personality traits through which organisms evaluate and respond to environment changes by adjusting their behavior. The Kelp Gull (Larus dominicanus) is a generalist seabird that consumes a wide variety of prey. Neophobia levels and exploratory behavior in novel circumstances were analyzed in urban adult (n = 13) and immature (n = 15) Kelp Gulls captured in the landfill of Mar del Plata city. These personality traits were not significantly affected by the age of the bird. Longer feeding latencies were observed in presence of novel objects, and neophobia levels were higher in the presence of a transparent box. The exploratory events were brief and influenced by the physical properties of the objects; gulls favored complex and yellow objects. Higher neophobia levels were associated with a longer time to start the exploration and spending less time investigating the objects. Exposure to an urban environment can modulate the novelty response, partially explaining lack of difference in neophobia levels and exploratory behavior between ages, as well as the apparent absence of intrinsic attraction to unfamiliar objects when not associated with a food source. Furthermore, in relation to complex objects, unfamiliar objects likely offer richer information, driving gulls' exploratory preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Candelaria Biagiotti Barchiesi
- Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (FCEyN), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Juan B. Justo 2550, Mar del Plata B7608FBY, Argentina.
| | - German O Garcia
- Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (FCEyN), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Juan B. Justo 2550, Mar del Plata B7608FBY, Argentina.
| | - Melina V Castano
- Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (FCEyN), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Juan B. Justo 2550, Mar del Plata B7608FBY, Argentina.
| | - Laura M Biondi
- Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras (IIMyC), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (FCEyN), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata - Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Juan B. Justo 2550, Mar del Plata B7608FBY, Argentina.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Labadie M, Morand S, Bourgarel M, Niama FR, Nguilili GF, Tobi N, Caron A, De Nys H. Habitat sharing and interspecies interactions in caves used by bats in the Republic of Congo. PeerJ 2025; 13:e18145. [PMID: 39802183 PMCID: PMC11725272 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.18145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2024] [Accepted: 08/30/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Bats play key roles in ecosystem functions and provide services to human populations. There is a need to protect bat populations and to mitigate the risks associated with pathogen spillover. Caves are key habitats for many bat species, which use them as roosting and breeding sites. Caves, bats and their guano also attract many other animals along trophic chains which might favor direct or indirect interspecies interactions. Two caves hosting colonies of insectivorous bats have been investigated in the Republic of Congo to characterize habitat sharing and interactions between bats, humans and animals. We set up a camera-trap monitoring protocol during 19 months at the entrance of and inside each cave. Our results demonstrated the richness and complexity of the species interactions around and within these caves. We identified and/or quantified mainly rodents, but also numerous categories of animals such as insects, birds, reptiles and carnivores using the caves. We investigated the temporal variation in the use of caves and the potential interactions between humans, wild animals and bat colonies. Our study contributes to the understanding of the interface and interactions, for the first time quantified, between cave-dwelling animal species, including humans. This knowledge is important to promote the conservation of cave ecosystems and better understand the ecology of infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Serge Morand
- Kasetsart University, Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Bangkok, Thailand
- Kasetsart University—Mahidol University, IRL HealthDEEP, CNRS, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mathieu Bourgarel
- CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Fabien Roch Niama
- Laboratoire National de Santé Publique, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo
| | - Guytrich Franel Nguilili
- Direction Générale de l’Élevage (Service vétérinaire), Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’élevage et de la pêche, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo
| | - N’Kaya Tobi
- Direction Générale de l’Élevage (Service vétérinaire), Ministère de l’Agriculture, de l’élevage et de la pêche, Brazzaville, Republic of the Congo
| | - Alexandre Caron
- CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France
- Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Faculdade de Veterinaria, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Helene De Nys
- CIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, Harare, Zimbabwe
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oestreich WK, Oliver RY, Chapman MS, Go MC, McKenna MF. Listening to animal behavior to understand changing ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 2024; 39:961-973. [PMID: 38972787 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2024.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/09/2024]
Abstract
Interpreting sound gives powerful insight into the health of ecosystems. Beyond detecting the presence of wildlife, bioacoustic signals can reveal their behavior. However, behavioral bioacoustic information is underused because identifying the function and context of animals' sounds remains challenging. A growing acoustic toolbox is allowing researchers to begin decoding bioacoustic signals by linking individual and population-level sensing. Yet, studies integrating acoustic tools for behavioral insight across levels of biological organization remain scarce. We aim to catalyze the emerging field of behavioral bioacoustics by synthesizing recent successes and rising analytical, logistical, and ethical challenges. Because behavior typically represents animals' first response to environmental change, we posit that behavioral bioacoustics will provide theoretical and applied insights into animals' adaptations to global change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ruth Y Oliver
- Bren School of Environmental Science and Management, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Melissa S Chapman
- National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Madeline C Go
- Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, Moss Landing, CA, USA
| | - Megan F McKenna
- Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gross IP, Wilson AE, Wolak ME. The fitness consequences of wildlife conservation translocations: a meta-analysis. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 2024; 99:348-371. [PMID: 37844577 DOI: 10.1111/brv.13025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
Conservation translocation is a common strategy to offset mounting rates of population declines through the transfer of captive- or wild-origin organisms into areas where conspecific populations are imperilled or completely extirpated. Translocations that supplement existing populations are referred to as reinforcements and can be conducted using captive-origin animals [ex situ reinforcement (ESR)] or wild-origin animals without any captive ancestry [in situ reinforcement (ISR)]. These programs have been criticized for low success rates and husbandry practices that produce individuals with genetic and performance deficits, but the post-release performance of captive-origin or wild-origin translocated groups has not been systematically reviewed to quantify success relative to wild-resident control groups. To assess the disparity in post-release performance of translocated organisms relative to wild-resident conspecifics and examine the association of performance disparity with organismal and methodological factors across studies, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 821 performance comparisons from 171 studies representing nine animal classes (101 species). We found that translocated organisms have 64% decreased odds of out-performing their wild-resident counterparts, supporting claims of systemic issues hampering conservation translocations. To help identify translocation practices that could maximize program success in the future, we further quantified the impact of broad organismal and methodological factors on the disparity between translocated and wild-resident conspecific performance. Pre-release animal enrichment significantly reduced performance disparities, whereas our results suggest no overall effects of taxonomic group, sex, captive generation time, or the type of fitness surrogate measured. This work is the most comprehensive systematic review to date of animal conservation translocations in which wild conspecifics were used as comparators, thereby facilitating an evaluation of the overall impact of this conservation strategy and identifying specific actions to increase success. Our review highlights the need for conservation managers to include both sympatric and allopatric wild-reference groups to ensure the post-release performance of translocated animals can be evaluated. Further, our analyses identify pre-release animal enrichment as a particular strategy for improving the outcomes of animal conservation translocations, and demonstrate how meta-analysis can be used to identify implementation choices that maximize translocated animal contributions to recipient population growth and viability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iwo P Gross
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 120 W. Samford Avenue, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA
| | - Alan E Wilson
- School of Fisheries, Aquaculture, and Aquatic Sciences, Auburn University, 382 Mell Street, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA
| | - Matthew E Wolak
- Department of Biological Sciences, Auburn University, 120 W. Samford Avenue, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bilby J, Moseby K. Review of hyperdispersal in wildlife translocations. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2024; 38:e14083. [PMID: 36919937 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
Species translocation is a common tool to reverse biodiversity loss, but it has a high failure rate. One factor that contributes to failure is postrelease hyperdispersal, which we define as the long-distance movement of individuals resulting in their failure to contribute to population establishment. We reviewed reported incidences of hyperdispersal and compared rates of hyperdispersal among taxa, population demographics, release cohorts, and success of mitigation techniques. Of 151 conservation translocations (reinforcements and reintroductions) in which animals were tracked, hyperdispersal was confirmed in 52.1% of programs. The prevalence of hyperdispersal (percentage of studies) was relatively consistent across taxa (42.9-60%), but hyperdispersal rates in birds were likely underestimated because 76.9% of bird translocations showed incidences in which birds could not be located after release, but hyperdispersal was unable to be confirmed. Eutherians exhibited a higher average incidence of hyperdispersal (percentage of hyperdispersing individuals in a cohort) of 20.2% than birds, reptiles, and marsupials (10.4%, 15.7%, and 10.3%, respectively). No significant trends were observed for sex, source population, or translocation type, but there were nonsignificant trends for males to hyperdisperse more than females and for higher incidences of hyperdispersal in reinforcements relative to reintroduction programs. Mitigation techniques included temporary confinement, supplementation of resources, and releasing animals in social groups, but only half of studies examining mitigation techniques found them useful. Hyperdispersal incidence was variable within taxa, and we advise against forming translocations strategies based on results from other species. Hyperdispersal is a significant welfare, economic, and conservation issue in translocations, and we suggest definitions, reporting, and experimental strategies to address it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Bilby
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katherine Moseby
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Keith SA, Drury JP, McGill BJ, Grether GF. Macrobehaviour: behavioural variation across space, time, and taxa. Trends Ecol Evol 2023; 38:1177-1188. [PMID: 37661519 DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2023.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/10/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
We explore how integrating behavioural ecology and macroecology can provide fundamental new insight into both fields, with particular relevance for understanding ecological responses to rapid environmental change. We outline the field of macrobehaviour, which aims to unite these disciplines explicitly, and highlight examples of research in this space. Macrobehaviour can be envisaged as a spectrum, where behavioural ecologists and macroecologists use new data and borrow tools and approaches from one another. At the heart of this spectrum, interdisciplinary research considers how selection in the context of large-scale factors can lead to systematic patterns in behavioural variation across space, time, and taxa, and in turn, influence macroecological patterns and processes. Macrobehaviour has the potential to enhance forecasts of future biodiversity change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally A Keith
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK.
| | - Jonathan P Drury
- Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK
| | - Brian J McGill
- School of Biology and Ecology and Mitchell Center for Sustainability Solutions, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA
| | - Gregory F Grether
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chung MHJ, Barber I, Head ML. Long-term environmental stability does not erode plasticity in nest building responses to changing ambient conditions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2023; 378:20220154. [PMID: 37427465 PMCID: PMC10331907 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The primary function of animal nests is to protect developing offspring from hostile and fluctuating environments. Animal builders have been shown to adjust nest construction in response to changes in their environment. However, the extent of this plasticity, and its dependence on an evolutionary history of environmental variability, is not well understood. To test whether an evolutionary history with flowing water impacts male ability to adjust nests in response to flow regime, we collected three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) from three lakes and three rivers, and brought them into reproductive condition in controlled laboratory aquaria. Males were then allowed to nest under both flowing and static conditions. Nest building behaviour, nest structure and nest composition were all recorded. In comparison to males building nests under static conditions, males building in flowing water took longer to construct their nests and invested more in nesting behaviour. Moreover, nests built in flowing water contained less material, were smaller, more compact, neater and more elongated than nests built under static conditions. Whether males came from rivers or lakes had little impact on nesting activities, or male capacity to adjust behaviours in response to flow treatment. Our findings suggest that aquatic animals which have experienced a stable environment over a long period of time retain plasticity in nest-building behaviours that allow them to adjust nests to ambient flow conditions. This ability may prove crucial in coping with the increasingly unpredictable flow regimes found in anthropogenically altered waterways and those resulting from global climate change. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolutionary ecology of nests: a cross-taxon approach'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng-Han Joseph Chung
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, 2601, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Iain Barber
- Department of Life Sciences, Aberystwyth University, SY23 3DA, Aberystwyth, UK
| | - Megan L. Head
- Division of Ecology and Evolution, Research School of Biology, Australian National University, 2601, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Summers J, Lukas D, Logan CJ, Chen N. The role of climate change and niche shifts in divergent range dynamics of a sister-species pair. PEER COMMUNITY JOURNAL 2023; 3:e23. [PMID: 37424524 PMCID: PMC10328137 DOI: 10.24072/pcjournal.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
Species ranges are set by limitations in factors including climate tolerances, habitat use, and dispersal abilities. Understanding the factors governing species range dynamics remains a challenge that is ever more important in our rapidly changing world. Species ranges can shift if environmental changes affect available habitat, or if the niche or habitat connectivity of a species changes. We tested how changes in habitat availability, niche, or habitat connectivity could contribute to divergent range dynamics in a sister-species pair. The great-tailed grackle (Quiscalus mexicanus) has expanded its range northward from Texas to Nebraska in the past 40 years, while its closest relative, the boattailed grackle (Quiscalus major), has remained tied to the coasts of the Atlantic Ocean and the Gulf of Mexico as well as the interior of Florida. We created species distribution and connectivity models trained on citizen science data from 1970-1979 and 2010-2019 to determine how the availability of habitat, the types of habitat occupied, and range-wide connectivity have changed for both species. We found that the two species occupy distinct habitats and that the great-tailed grackle has shifted to occupy a larger breadth of urban, arid environments farther from natural water sources. Meanwhile, the boattailed grackle has remained limited to warm, wet, coastal environments. We found no evidence that changes in habitat connectivity affected the ranges of either species. Overall, our results suggest that the great-tailed grackle has shifted its realized niche as part of its rapid range expansion, while the range dynamics of the boat-tailed grackle may be shaped more by climate change. The expansion in habitats occupied by the great-tailed grackle is consistent with observations that species with high behavioral flexibility can rapidly expand their geographic range by using human-altered habitat. This investigation identifies how opposite responses to anthropogenic change could drive divergent range dynamics, elucidating the factors that have and will continue to shape species ranges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dieter Lukas
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Corina J Logan
- Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
- University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, USA
| | - Nancy Chen
- University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Cerini F, Childs DZ, Clements CF. A predictive timeline of wildlife population collapse. Nat Ecol Evol 2023; 7:320-331. [PMID: 36702859 DOI: 10.1038/s41559-023-01985-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Contemporary rates of biodiversity decline emphasize the need for reliable ecological forecasting, but current methods vary in their ability to predict the declines of real-world populations. Acknowledging that stressor effects start at the individual level, and that it is the sum of these individual-level effects that drives populations to collapse, shifts the focus of predictive ecology away from using predominantly abundance data. Doing so opens new opportunities to develop predictive frameworks that utilize increasingly available multi-dimensional data, which have previously been overlooked for ecological forecasting. Here, we propose that stressed populations will exhibit a predictable sequence of observable changes through time: changes in individuals' behaviour will occur as the first sign of increasing stress, followed by changes in fitness-related morphological traits, shifts in the dynamics (for example, birth rates) of populations and finally abundance declines. We discuss how monitoring the sequential appearance of these signals may allow us to discern whether a population is increasingly at risk of collapse, or is adapting in the face of environmental change, providing a conceptual framework to develop new forecasting methods that combine multi-dimensional (for example, behaviour, morphology, life history and abundance) data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cerini
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Dylan Z Childs
- School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Barnes CH, Chumkiew S, Piyatadsananon P, Strine CT. Seeing wildlife behavior in a new way: Novel utilization of computer vision for focal reptile videography behavior study. WILDLIFE SOC B 2023. [DOI: 10.1002/wsb.1426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Curt H. Barnes
- School of Biology, Institute of Science Suranaree University of Technology 111 Maha Witthayalai Road, Suranari Subdistrict, Nakhon Ratchasima District Nakhon Ratchasima 3000 Thailand
| | - Sirilak Chumkiew
- School of Biology, Institute of Science Suranaree University of Technology 111 Maha Witthayalai Road, Suranari Subdistrict, Nakhon Ratchasima District Nakhon Ratchasima 3000 Thailand
| | - Pantip Piyatadsananon
- School of Biology, Institute of Science Suranaree University of Technology 111 Maha Witthayalai Road, Suranari Subdistrict, Nakhon Ratchasima District Nakhon Ratchasima 3000 Thailand
| | - Colin T. Strine
- School of Biology, Institute of Science Suranaree University of Technology 111 Maha Witthayalai Road, Suranari Subdistrict, Nakhon Ratchasima District Nakhon Ratchasima 3000 Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
MacKinlay RD, Shaw RC. A systematic review of animal personality in conservation science. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2023; 37:e13935. [PMID: 35561041 PMCID: PMC10084254 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13935] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
Although animal personality research may have applied uses, this suggestion has yet to be evaluated by assessing empirical studies examining animal personality and conservation. To address this knowledge gap, we performed a systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature relating to conservation science and animal personality. Criteria for inclusion in our review included access to full text, primary research articles, and relevant animal conservation or personality focus (i.e., not human personality studies). Ninety-two articles met these criteria. We summarized the conservation contexts, testing procedures (including species and sample size), analytical approach, claimed personality traits (activity, aggression, boldness, exploration, and sociability), and each report's key findings and conservation-focused suggestions. Although providing evidence for repeatability in behavior is crucial for personality studies, repeatability quantification was implemented in only half of the reports. Nonetheless, each of the 5 personality traits were investigated to some extent in a range of conservations contexts. The most robust studies in the field showed variance in how personality relates to other ecologically important variables across species and contexts. Moreover, many studies were first attempts at using personality for conservation purposes in a given study system. Overall, it appears personality is not yet a fully realized tool for conservation. To apply personality research to conservation problems, we suggest researchers think about where individual differences in behavior may affect conservation outcomes in their system, assess where there are opportunities for repeated measures, and follow the most current methodological guides on quantifying personality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regan D. MacKinlay
- School of Biological SciencesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
| | - Rachael C. Shaw
- School of Biological SciencesVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Edelblutte É, Krithivasan R, Hayek MN. Animal agency in wildlife conservation and management. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2023; 37:e13853. [PMID: 35262968 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Revised: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Wildlife conservation and management (WCM) practices have been historically drawn from a wide variety of academic fields, yet practitioners have been slow to engage with emerging conversations about animals as complex beings, whose individuality and sociality influence their relationships with humans. We propose an explicit acknowledgement of wild, nonhuman animals as active participants in WCM. We examined 190 studies of WCM interventions and outcomes to highlight 3 common assumptions that underpin many present approaches to WCM: animal behaviors are rigid and homogeneous; wildlife exhibit idealized wild behavior and prefer pristine habitats; and human-wildlife relationships are of marginal or secondary importance relative to nonhuman interactions. We found that these management interventions insufficiently considered animal learning, decision-making, individuality, sociality, and relationships with humans and led to unanticipated detrimental outcomes. To address these shortcomings, we synthesized theoretical advances in animal behavioral sciences, animal geographies, and animal legal theory that may help conservation professionals reconceptualize animals and their relationships with humans. Based on advances in these fields, we constructed the concept of animal agency, which we define as the ability of animals to actively influence conservation and management outcomes through their adaptive, context-specific, and complex behaviors that are predicated on their sentience, individuality, lived experiences, cognition, sociality, and cultures in ways that shape and reshape shared human-wildlife cultures, spaces, and histories. Conservation practices, such as compassionate conservation, convivial conservation, and ecological justice, incorporate facets of animal agency. Animal agency can be incorporated in conservation problem-solving by assessing the ways in which agency contributes to species' survival and by encouraging more adaptive and collaborative decision-making among human and nonhuman stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Émilie Edelblutte
- Earth and Environment Department, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Roopa Krithivasan
- Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew Nassif Hayek
- Department of Environmental Studies, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kelleher SR, Silla AJ, Hunter DA, McFadden MS, Byrne PG. Captive diet does not influence exploration behavior upon reintroduction to the wild in a critically endangered amphibian. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2022. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2022.985545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Exploration behavior can have profound effects on individual fitness. Consequently, knowledge of the proximate mechanisms underpinning exploration behavior may inform conservation breeding programs (CBPs) for threatened species. However, the environmental factors that influence exploration behavior in captivity and during the reintroduction process remain poorly understood. Dietary micronutrients, such as carotenoids, are known to affect the expression of energetically costly behavioral traits, and theoretically may also influence the degree of exploration behavior in various contexts. Here, we investigate whether dietary β-carotene supplementation in captivity influences exploration behavior upon reintroduction to the wild in the critically endangered southern corroboree frog, Pseudophryne corroboree. We conducted a manipulative dietary experiment where captive bred P. corroboree were supplemented with different doses of β-carotene for 40 weeks prior to release. Frogs (n = 115) were reintroduced to the wild using a soft-release approach, where they were released into field enclosures specifically designed for this species. Upon reintroduction, the frogs’ initial exploration behavior was measured using a standardized behavioral assay. There was no effect of diet treatment on any measure of exploration behavior (mean latency to leave the initial refuge, time spent mobile within the release apparatus and latency to disperse into the field enclosure). However, there was a significant relationship between individual body size and latency to leave the refuge, whereby smaller individuals left the refuge more rapidly. While these findings provide no evidence that β-carotene at the dosages tested influences P. corroboree exploration behavior in a reintroduction context, the effect of body size draws attention to the potential for bodily state to influence exploration behavior. We discuss the need for ongoing research investigating the influence of captive diet on post release behavior, and highlight how knowledge concerning state-dependent behavior might help to inform and direct reintroduction programs.
Collapse
|
17
|
Burton AC, Beirne C, Sun C, Granados A, Procko M, Chen C, Fennell M, Constantinou A, Colton C, Tjaden‐McClement K, Fisher JT, Burgar J. Behavioral "bycatch" from camera trap surveys yields insights on prey responses to human-mediated predation risk. Ecol Evol 2022; 12:e9108. [PMID: 35866017 PMCID: PMC9288887 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Human disturbance directly affects animal populations and communities, but indirect effects of disturbance on species behaviors are less well understood. For instance, disturbance may alter predator activity and cause knock-on effects to predator-sensitive foraging in prey. Camera traps provide an emerging opportunity to investigate such disturbance-mediated impacts to animal behaviors across multiple scales. We used camera trap data to test predictions about predator-sensitive behavior in three ungulate species (caribou Rangifer tarandus; white-tailed deer, Odocoileus virginianus; moose, Alces alces) across two western boreal forest landscapes varying in disturbance. We quantified behavior as the number of camera trap photos per detection event and tested its relationship to inferred human-mediated predation risk between a landscape with greater industrial disturbance and predator activity and a "control" landscape with lower human and predator activity. We also assessed the finer-scale influence on behavior of variation in predation risk (relative to habitat variation) across camera sites within the more disturbed landscape. We predicted that animals in areas with greater predation risk (e.g., more wolf activity, less cover) would travel faster past cameras and generate fewer photos per detection event, while animals in areas with less predation risk would linger (rest, forage, investigate), generating more photos per event. Our predictions were supported at the landscape-level, as caribou and moose had more photos per event in the control landscape where disturbance-mediated predation risk was lower. At a finer-scale within the disturbed landscape, no prey species showed a significant behavioral response to wolf activity, but the number of photos per event decreased for white-tailed deer with increasing line of sight (m) along seismic lines (i.e., decreasing visual cover), consistent with a predator-sensitive response. The presence of juveniles was associated with shorter behavioral events for caribou and moose, suggesting greater predator sensitivity for females with calves. Only moose demonstrated a positive behavioral association (i.e., longer events) with vegetation productivity (16-day NDVI), suggesting that for other species bottom-up influences of forage availability were generally weaker than top-down influences from predation risk. Behavioral insights can be gleaned from camera trap surveys and provide complementary information about animal responses to predation risk, and thus about the indirect impacts of human disturbances on predator-prey interactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Cole Burton
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Christopher Beirne
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Catherine Sun
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Alys Granados
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Michael Procko
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Cheng Chen
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Mitchell Fennell
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Alexia Constantinou
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Chris Colton
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Katie Tjaden‐McClement
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Jason T. Fisher
- School of Environmental StudiesUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaBritish ColumbiaCanada
| | - Joanna Burgar
- Wildlife Coexistence Lab, Department of Forest Resources ManagementUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverBritish ColumbiaCanada
- School of Environmental StudiesUniversity of VictoriaVictoriaBritish ColumbiaCanada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Clements SJ, Zhao Q, Silk MJ, Hodgson DJ, Weegman MD. Modelling associations between animal social structure and demography. Anim Behav 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2022.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
|
19
|
Hammond TT, Swaisgood RR, Jacobs LE, Curtis MJ, McCormick BA, Hornfeldt JA, Trotman EM, Shier DM. Age‐dependent effects of developmental experience on morphology, performance, dispersal and survival in a translocated, endangered species. J Appl Ecol 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eric M. Trotman
- San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Escondido CA USA
- Department of Biology University of Florida Gainesville FL USA
| | - Debra M. Shier
- San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Escondido CA USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of California Los Angeles CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hennessy SM, Wisinski CL, Ronan NA, Gregory CJ, Swaisgood RR, Nordstrom LA. Release strategies and ecological factors influence mitigation translocation outcomes for burrowing owls: a comparative evaluation. Anim Conserv 2022. [DOI: 10.1111/acv.12767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- S. M. Hennessy
- Recovery Ecology San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Escondido CA USA
| | - C. L. Wisinski
- Recovery Ecology San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Escondido CA USA
| | - N. A. Ronan
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office Palm Springs CA USA
| | - C. J. Gregory
- U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office Palm Springs CA USA
| | - R. R. Swaisgood
- Recovery Ecology San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Escondido CA USA
| | - L. A. Nordstrom
- Recovery Ecology San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Escondido CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pero EM, Chitwood MC, Hildreth AM, Berkman LK, Keller BJ, Sumners JA, Hansen LP, Isabelle JL, Eggert LS, Titus CL, Millspaugh JJ. Acclimation of elk mating system following restoration to the Missouri Ozarks, U.S.A. Restor Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/rec.13623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M. Pero
- Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive Missoula MT 59812 USA
| | - M. Colter Chitwood
- Natural Resource Ecology & Management Oklahoma State University, 008C Agriculture Hall Stillwater OK 74078 USA
| | - Aaron M. Hildreth
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Leah K. Berkman
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Barbara J. Keller
- Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Rd. St. Paul MN 55155 USA
| | - Jason A. Sumners
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 2901 W Truman Blvd Jefferson City MO 65102 USA
| | - Lonnie P. Hansen
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Jason L. Isabelle
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Lori S. Eggert
- Biological Sciences University of Missouri Columbia MO 65211 USA
| | - Chelsea L. Titus
- Missouri Department of Conservation, 3500 E Gans Rd. Columbia MO 65201 USA
| | - Joshua J. Millspaugh
- Wildlife Biology Program University of Montana, 32 Campus Drive Missoula MT 59812 USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dixon-MacCallum GP, Rich JL, Lloyd N, Blumstein DT, Moehrenschlager A. Loss of Predator Discrimination by Critically Endangered Vancouver Island Marmots Within Five Generations of Breeding for Release. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.718562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Conservation translocations, which involve the intentional movement and release of organisms for conservation benefit, are increasingly required to recover species of conservation concern. In order to maximize post-release survival, and to accomplish conservation translocation objectives, animals must exhibit behaviors that facilitate survival in the wild. The Vancouver Island marmot (Marmota vancouverensis) is a critically endangered endemic in Canada which has been captive-bred for 24 years for reintroductions and reinforcements that have increased the wild population from ~30 to more than 200 individuals. Despite this success many marmots are killed by predators after release and predation represents a major hurdle to full marmot recovery. To better understand if captive-bred marmots are prepared for the novel environment into which they will be released, and to determine whether such suitability changes over time, we presented taxidermy mounts of mammalian predators and non-predators to marmots that were wild-caught, and captive born for between one and five generations. We also examined mortality of offspring from marmots we tested that had been released to the wild. A minimum of 43% of offspring were killed by predators in the wild over 17 years, most by cougars. Marmots in captivity generally responded to taxidermy mounts by decreasing foraging and increasing vigilance, and overall responded more strongly to predators than non-predators, especially wolves. However, marmots in captivity for more than two generations lacked discrimination between cougars, non-predators, and controls, suggesting a rapid loss of predator recognition. This study was only possible because predator-recognition trials were initiated early in the conservation translocation program, and could then be repeated after a number of generations. The finding that changes occurred relatively rapidly (within five generations during which changes in genetic diversity were negligible) suggests that behavioral suitability may deteriorate more rapidly than genetics would suggest. Strategies addressing potential behavior loss should be considered, including sourcing additional wild individuals or pre-release training of captive-born individuals. Subsequently, post-release survival should be monitored to determine the efficacy of behavior-optimization strategies.
Collapse
|
23
|
Andrewartha TA, Evans MJ, Batson WG, Manning AD, Price C, Gordon IJ, Barton PS. Outfoxing the fox: Effect of prey odor on fox behavior in a pastoral landscape. CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/csp2.516] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Tim A. Andrewartha
- Fenner School of Environment and Society Australian National University Acton Australian Capital Territory Australia
| | - Maldwyn J. Evans
- Fenner School of Environment and Society Australian National University Acton Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Department of Ecosystem Studies, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences University of Tokyo Tokyo Japan
| | - William G. Batson
- Mulligans Flat Woodland Sanctuary ACT Parks and Conservation Service Forde Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Capital Woodlands and Wetlands Conservation Trust Forde Australian Capital Territory Australia
- NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Blue Mountains Branch Blackheath New South Wales Australia
| | - Adrian D. Manning
- Fenner School of Environment and Society Australian National University Acton Australian Capital Territory Australia
| | - Catherine Price
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Sydney Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Iain J. Gordon
- Fenner School of Environment and Society Australian National University Acton Australian Capital Territory Australia
- Division of Tropical Environments & Societies James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia
- The James Hutton Institute Cragiebuckler, Aberdeen Scotland UK
- Land & Water, CSIRO Townsville Australia
| | - Philip S. Barton
- Fenner School of Environment and Society Australian National University Acton Australian Capital Territory Australia
- School of Science, Psychology and Sport Federation University Australia, University Drive Mount Helen Victoria Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Candolin U, Goncalves S, Pant P. Parental care amplifies changes in offspring production in a disturbed environment. OIKOS 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/oik.08668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrika Candolin
- Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Univ. of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | - Sara Goncalves
- Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Univ. of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| | - Pankaj Pant
- Organismal and Evolutionary Biology, Univ. of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Auld HL, Jacobson DP, Rhodes AC, Banks MA. Differences in Mate Pairings of Hatchery- and Natural-Origin Coho Salmon Inferred from Offspring Genotypes. Integr Org Biol 2021; 3:obab020. [PMID: 34409260 PMCID: PMC8363981 DOI: 10.1093/iob/obab020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Revised: 05/20/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Captive breeding can affect how sexual selection acts on subsequent generations. One context where this is important is in fish hatcheries. In many salmon hatcheries, spawning is controlled artificially and offspring are reared in captivity before release into the wild. While previous studies have suggested that hatchery- and natural-origin fish may make different mate choice decisions, it remains to be determined how hatchery fish may be making different mate choice decisions compared with natural-origin fish at a genetic level. Using genotyping-by-sequencing, we identify single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with variation in mate pairings from a natural context involving hatchery- and natural-origin coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). In both natural-origin and hatchery mate pairs, we observed more SNPs with negative assortment than positive assortment. However, only 3% of the negative assortment SNPs were shared between the two mating groups, and 1% of the positive assortment SNPs were shared between the two mating groups, indicating divergence in mating cues between wild and hatchery-raised salmon. These findings shed light on mate choice in general and may have important implications in the conservation management of species as well as for improving other captive breeding scenarios. There remains much to discover about mate choice in salmon and research described here reflects our intent to test the potential of ongoing advances in population genomics to develop new hatchery practices that may improve the performance of hatchery offspring, lessening the differences and thus potential impacts upon wild stocks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H L Auld
- Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
| | - D P Jacobson
- Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
| | - A C Rhodes
- Coastal Oregon Marine Experiment Station, Hatfield Marine Science Center, Oregon State University, Newport, OR 97365, USA
| | - M A Banks
- Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Conservation Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lewton J, Rose PE. Social networks research in ex situ populations: Patterns, trends, and future directions for conservation-focused behavioral research. Zoo Biol 2021; 40:493-502. [PMID: 34227153 DOI: 10.1002/zoo.21638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Social networks research using non-human animals has grown over the past decade, utilizing a wide range of species to answer an array of pure and applied questions. Network approaches have relevance to conservation, evaluating social influences on fecundity, health, fitness and longevity. While the application of network approaches to in situ populations with conservation concern appears in published literature, the degree to which ex situ and zoo-housed populations are the focus of "social networks for conservation research" is limited. Captive environments provide scientists with an ability to understand the social behavior of species that may be hard to observe consistently in the wild. This paper evaluates the scope of network research involving ex situ populations, analyzing output from 2010 to 2019 to determine trends in questions and subjects using ex situ populations. We show that only 8.2% of ex situ social network analysis (SNA) implications are of conservation-focus, apparent in papers relating to birds, carnivores, bats, primates, reptiles, and ungulates. Husbandry and welfare questions predominate in ex situ network research, but over half of these papers have nonpractical application (basic science). The chance of a citation for a basic science paper was 95.4% more than for a conservation-based paper. For taxonomic groups, primate-focused papers had the most citations. The focus of ex situ conservation-based networks research may be driven by the needs of conservation programs (e.g., population recovery outcomes) or by a need to evaluate the efficacy of ex situ conservation goals. We evaluate our findings considering the IUCN's One Plan Approach to conservation to show how in situ and ex situ network research is applicable to global conservation efforts. We have identified that there is a lack of application and evaluation of SNA to wildlife conservation. We highlight future areas of research in zoos and hope to stimulate discussion and collaboration between relevant parties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Lewton
- Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, UK
| | - Paul E Rose
- Centre for Research in Animal Behaviour, College of Life & Environmental Science, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,WWT Slimbridge Wetland Centre, Slimbridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Barocas A, Farfan J, Groenendijk J, Mendoza J, Silva J, Mujica O, Ochoa JA, Macdonald DW, Swaisgood RR. Disturbance‐specific behavioral responses of giant otters exposed to ecotourism and extractive activities. Anim Conserv 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/acv.12713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- A. Barocas
- Recovery Ecology San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Escondido CA USA
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit Department of Zoology The Recanati‐Kaplan Centre University of Oxford Abingdon UK
- San Diego Zoo Global‐Peru Cusco Peru
| | - J. Farfan
- Frankfurt Zoological Society – Perú Cusco Peru
- Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco Cusco Peru
| | | | - J. Mendoza
- National Service of Protected Natural Areas (SERNANP) Cusco Peru
| | - J. Silva
- Frankfurt Zoological Society – Perú Cusco Peru
| | - O. Mujica
- Frankfurt Zoological Society – Perú Cusco Peru
| | - J. A. Ochoa
- Facultad de Ciencias Universidad Nacional de San Antonio Abad del Cusco Cusco Peru
- Museo de Biodiversidad del Perú Cusco Peru
| | - D. W. Macdonald
- Wildlife Conservation Research Unit Department of Zoology The Recanati‐Kaplan Centre University of Oxford Abingdon UK
| | - R. R. Swaisgood
- Recovery Ecology San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance Escondido CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lo FHY, Tsang TPN, Bonebrake TC. Behavior-partitioned diversity reveals differential habitat values of gardens to butterfly communities. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 31:e02331. [PMID: 33756047 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Diversity metrics, essential for habitat evaluation in conservation, are often based on occurrences records with little consideration of behavioral ecology. As species use diverse habitats to perform different behaviors, reliance on occurrence records alone will fail to reveal environmental conditions shaping the behavioral importance of habitats with respect to resource exploitation. Here, we integrated occurrence and behavioral records to quantify diversity and assessed how environmental determinants shape the behavioral importance of gardens to butterflies across Hong Kong. We conducted standardized butterfly sampling and behavioral observation, and recorded environmental variables related to climate, habitat quality, and landscape connectivity. We found differential responses of diversity and behavioral diversity metrics to environmental variables. Connectivity increased taxonomic richness based on occurrence and flying across records, while temperature reduced richness based on occurrence, settling and interaction records. Floral abundance increased richness based on nectaring records only. No environmental variable promoted the average number of behavioral types observed in each taxon. Our results suggest that connectivity and temperature determine the richness of butterflies reaching gardens, while floral abundance determines whether butterflies use the sites as nectaring grounds via modifying species behaviors. Our study demonstrates the utility in integrating behavioral and diversity data to reveal how environmental conditions shape behavioral importance of habitats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona H Y Lo
- Division of Ecology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Toby P N Tsang
- Division of Ecology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Timothy C Bonebrake
- Division of Ecology & Biodiversity, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gunner RM, Wilson RP, Holton MD, Scott R, Arkwright A, Fahlman A, Ulrich M, Hopkins P, Duarte C, Eizaguirre C. Activity of loggerhead turtles during the U-shaped dive: insights using angular velocity metrics. ENDANGER SPECIES RES 2021. [DOI: 10.3354/esr01125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Understanding the behavioural ecology of endangered taxa can inform conservation strategies. The activity budgets of the loggerhead turtle Caretta caretta are still poorly understood because many tracking methods show only horizontal displacement and ignore dives and associated behaviours. However, time-depth recorders have enabled researchers to identify flat, U-shaped dives (or type 1a dives) and these are conventionally labelled as resting dives on the seabed because they involve no vertical displacement of the animal. Video- and acceleration-based studies have demonstrated this is not always true. Focusing on sea turtles nesting on the Cabo Verde archipelago, we describe a new metric derived from magnetometer data, absolute angular velocity, that integrates indices of angular rotation in the horizontal plane to infer activity. Using this metric, we evaluated the variation in putative resting behaviours during the bottom phase of type 1a dives for 5 individuals over 13 to 17 d at sea during a single inter-nesting interval (over 75 turtle d in total). We defined absolute resting within the bottom phase of type 1a dives as periods with no discernible acceleration or angular movement. Whilst absolute resting constituted a significant proportion of each turtle’s time budget for this 1a dive type, turtles allocated 16-38% of their bottom time to activity, with many dives being episodic, comprised of intermittent bouts of rest and rotational activity. This implies that previously considered resting behaviours are complex and need to be accounted for in energy budgets, particularly since energy budgets may impact conservation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- RM Gunner
- Swansea Lab for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - RP Wilson
- Swansea Lab for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - MD Holton
- Swansea Lab for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - R Scott
- GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research, Kiel, Düsternbrooker Weg 20, 24105 Kiel, Germany
- Natural Environmental Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN2 1FL, UK
| | - A Arkwright
- Swansea Lab for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
- L’Oceanogràfic, Ciutat de les Arts i de les Ciències, Carrer d’Eduardo Primo Yúfera, 1B, 46013 Valencia, Spain
| | - A Fahlman
- L’Oceanogràfic, Ciutat de les Arts i de les Ciències, Carrer d’Eduardo Primo Yúfera, 1B, 46013 Valencia, Spain
| | - M Ulrich
- Institutionen för fysik kemi och biologi (IFM), Linköping Universitet, Olaus Magnus väg, 583 30 Linköping, Sweden
| | - P Hopkins
- Swansea Lab for Animal Movement, Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK
| | - C Duarte
- Red Sea Research Centre, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST), Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
| | - C Eizaguirre
- School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London E35SA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Brakes P, Carroll EL, Dall SRX, Keith SA, McGregor PK, Mesnick SL, Noad MJ, Rendell L, Robbins MM, Rutz C, Thornton A, Whiten A, Whiting MJ, Aplin LM, Bearhop S, Ciucci P, Fishlock V, Ford JKB, Notarbartolo di Sciara G, Simmonds MP, Spina F, Wade PR, Whitehead H, Williams J, Garland EC. A deepening understanding of animal culture suggests lessons for conservation. Proc Biol Sci 2021; 288:20202718. [PMID: 33878919 PMCID: PMC8059593 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.2718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
A key goal of conservation is to protect biodiversity by supporting the long-term persistence of viable, natural populations of wild species. Conservation practice has long been guided by genetic, ecological and demographic indicators of risk. Emerging evidence of animal culture across diverse taxa and its role as a driver of evolutionary diversification, population structure and demographic processes may be essential for augmenting these conventional conservation approaches and decision-making. Animal culture was the focus of a ground-breaking resolution under the Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals (CMS), an international treaty operating under the UN Environment Programme. Here, we synthesize existing evidence to demonstrate how social learning and animal culture interact with processes important to conservation management. Specifically, we explore how social learning might influence population viability and be an important resource in response to anthropogenic change, and provide examples of how it can result in phenotypically distinct units with different, socially learnt behavioural strategies. While identifying culture and social learning can be challenging, indirect identification and parsimonious inferences may be informative. Finally, we identify relevant methodologies and provide a framework for viewing behavioural data through a cultural lens which might provide new insights for conservation management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippa Brakes
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
- Whale and Dolphin Conservation, Brookfield House, Chippenham, Wiltshire SN15 1LJ, UK
| | - Emma L. Carroll
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 8LB, UK
| | - Sasha R. X. Dall
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
| | - Sally A. Keith
- Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YQ, UK
| | | | - Sarah L. Mesnick
- Marine Mammal and Turtle Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
- Scripps Institution of Oceanography, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0203, USA
| | - Michael J. Noad
- Cetacean Ecology and Acoustics Laboratory, School of Veterinary Science, The University of Queensland, QLD 4343, Australia
| | - Luke Rendell
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 8LB, UK
- Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK
| | - Martha M. Robbins
- Department of Primatology, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Christian Rutz
- Centre for Biological Diversity, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK
| | - Alex Thornton
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
| | - Andrew Whiten
- Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9JP, UK
| | - Martin J. Whiting
- Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia
| | - Lucy M. Aplin
- Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, Radolfzell 78315, Germany
- Centre for the Advanced Study of Collective Behaviour, University of Konstanz, Konstanz 78467, Germany
| | - Stuart Bearhop
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
| | - Paolo Ciucci
- Department of Biology and Biotechnologies, University of Rome La Sapienza, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Vicki Fishlock
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall TR10 9FE, UK
- Amboseli Trust for Elephants, Langata 00509, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - John K. B. Ford
- Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Mark P. Simmonds
- Bristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol BS40 5DU, UK
- Humane Society International, London N1 7LY, UK
| | - Fernando Spina
- Istituto Superiore Protezione Ricerca Ambientale (ISPRA), I-40064 Ozzano Emilia (BO), Italy
| | - Paul R. Wade
- Marine Mammal Laboratory, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, WA 98115, USA
- School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
| | - Hal Whitehead
- Biology Department, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3H4R2
| | - James Williams
- Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Monkstone House, Peterborough PE1 1JY, UK
| | - Ellen C. Garland
- Sea Mammal Research Unit, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 8LB, UK
- Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive Evolution, School of Biology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews KY16 9TH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Greggor AL, Berger-Tal O, Swaisgood RR, Cooke SJ, DeVault TL, Fernández-Juricic E, Gienapp A, Hall S, Hostetter C, Owen MA, Rankin S, Ruppert KA, Swaddle JP, Blumstein DT. Using Change Models to Envision Better Applications of Animal Behavior Research in Conservation Management and Beyond. FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fcosc.2021.653056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
While most animal behavior researchers have mastered the process of knowledge creation, generating knowledge that can readily be applied requires a different set of skills. The process and timeframe of fundamental scientific knowledge production is often not relevant to those who might apply it, such as conservation or wildlife managers. Additionally, the complex challenges that policy makers, managers and practitioners face are often not adequately communicated to and among scientists. This mutual disconnect in discourse, relationships, common terms, and practices is especially apparent when animal behavior researchers seek to have applied impact. We argue that bridging the complex implementation gap in animal behavior requires a formalized vision for change. We turn to change model theory, a tool commonly used in other fields for identifying the links between actions and outcomes necessary for enacting large-scale change. We focus on the subfield of conservation behavior with a change model that outlines specific ways to improve collaboration and coordination between animal behavior science and conservation practice. We present this targeted change model, review each strategy the model outlines, and highlight pressing actions that people from various career stages and backgrounds can take. We encourage researchers to further the alignment of science with management needs by developing the proper communication mechanisms for improved cultural exchange and plan future change model efforts directly targeting managers. Beyond the conservation behavior change model we present, we also discuss the broad applicability of change models to enhance the application of academic research to other fields. Fundamental science researchers are increasingly required to show impact of their work on society; the change model process we describe here can enable further impact.
Collapse
|
32
|
de Azevedo CS, Young RJ. Animal Personality and Conservation: Basics for Inspiring New Research. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11041019. [PMID: 33916547 PMCID: PMC8065675 DOI: 10.3390/ani11041019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The study of animal personality is important to conserve animals because it can help in selecting the most appropriate individuals to be released into the wild. Individuals not so bold or aggressive, less stressed, who explore their new environment with greater caution are often more likely to survive after release into the wild. In contrast, bolder and more aggressive animals reproduce more successfully and, therefore, can be released with the aim of rapid repopulation of an area. These and other aspects of how animal personality can help in conservation programs, as well as how to collect personality data are covered in this paper. Abstract The number of animal species threatened with extinction are increasing every year, and biologists are conducting animal translocations, as one strategy, to try to mitigate this situation. Furthermore, researchers are evaluating methods to increase translocation success, and one area that shows promise is the study of animal personality. Animal personality can be defined as behavioral and physiological differences between individuals of the same species, which are stable in time and across different contexts. In the present paper, we discuss how animal personality can increase the success of translocation, as well as in the management of animals intended for translocation by evaluating personality characteristics of the individuals. Studies of the influence of birthplace, parental behavior, stress resilience, and risk assessment can be important to select the most appropriate individuals to be released. Finally, we explain the two methods used to gather personality data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Schetini de Azevedo
- Departamento de Biodiversidade, Evolução e Meio Ambiente, Instituto de Ciências Exatas e Biológicas, Campus Morro do Cruzeiro, Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto, s/n Bauxita, Ouro Preto, MG 35.400-000, Brazil
- Correspondence:
| | - Robert John Young
- School of Science, Engineering and Environment, University of Salford Manchester, Peel Building—Room G51, Salford M5 4WT, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Elmer LK, Madliger CL, Blumstein DT, Elvidge CK, Fernández-Juricic E, Horodysky AZ, Johnson NS, McGuire LP, Swaisgood RR, Cooke SJ. Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management. CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY 2021; 9:coab002. [PMID: 33815799 PMCID: PMC8009554 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coab002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Multidisciplinary approaches to conservation and wildlife management are often effective in addressing complex, multi-factor problems. Emerging fields such as conservation physiology and conservation behaviour can provide innovative solutions and management strategies for target species and systems. Sensory ecology combines the study of 'how animals acquire' and process sensory stimuli from their environments, and the ecological and evolutionary significance of 'how animals respond' to this information. We review the benefits that sensory ecology can bring to wildlife conservation and management by discussing case studies across major taxa and sensory modalities. Conservation practices informed by a sensory ecology approach include the amelioration of sensory traps, control of invasive species, reduction of human-wildlife conflicts and relocation and establishment of new populations of endangered species. We illustrate that sensory ecology can facilitate the understanding of mechanistic ecological and physiological explanations underlying particular conservation issues and also can help develop innovative solutions to ameliorate conservation problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura K Elmer
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Christine L Madliger
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Daniel T Blumstein
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1606, USA
| | - Chris K Elvidge
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| | | | - Andrij Z Horodysky
- Department of Marine and Environmental Science, Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668, USA
| | - Nicholas S Johnson
- USGS, Great Lakes Science Center, Hammond Bay Biological Station, Millersburg, MI 49759, USA
| | - Liam P McGuire
- Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Ronald R Swaisgood
- Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, San Diego, CA 92027-7000, USA
| | - Steven J Cooke
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Northrup JM, Anderson CR, Gerber BD, Wittemyer G. Behavioral and Demographic Responses of Mule Deer to Energy Development on Winter Range. WILDLIFE MONOGRAPHS 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/wmon.1060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph M. Northrup
- Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Colorado State University 1474 Campus Delivery Fort Collins CO 80523 USA
- ; and Wildlife Research and Monitoring Section Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry 2140 East Bank Drive Peterborough ON K9L 1Z8 Canada
| | - Charles R. Anderson
- Mammals Research Section Colorado Parks and Wildlife 317 W Prospect Road Fort Collins CO 80526 USA
| | - Brian D. Gerber
- Department of Natural Resources Science University of Rhode Island 1 Greenhouse Road Kingston RI 02881‐2018 USA
| | - George Wittemyer
- Department of Fish, Wildlife and Conservation Biology Colorado State University 1474 Campus Delivery Fort Collins CO 80523 USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Cooke SJ, Bergman JN, Madliger CL, Cramp RL, Beardall J, Burness G, Clark TD, Dantzer B, de la Barrera E, Fangue NA, Franklin CE, Fuller A, Hawkes LA, Hultine KR, Hunt KE, Love OP, MacMillan HA, Mandelman JW, Mark FC, Martin LB, Newman AEM, Nicotra AB, Raby GD, Robinson SA, Ropert-Coudert Y, Rummer JL, Seebacher F, Todgham AE, Tomlinson S, Chown SL. One hundred research questions in conservation physiology for generating actionable evidence to inform conservation policy and practice. CONSERVATION PHYSIOLOGY 2021; 9:coab009. [PMID: 33859825 PMCID: PMC8035967 DOI: 10.1093/conphys/coab009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 01/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Environmental change and biodiversity loss are but two of the complex challenges facing conservation practitioners and policy makers. Relevant and robust scientific knowledge is critical for providing decision-makers with the actionable evidence needed to inform conservation decisions. In the Anthropocene, science that leads to meaningful improvements in biodiversity conservation, restoration and management is desperately needed. Conservation Physiology has emerged as a discipline that is well-positioned to identify the mechanisms underpinning population declines, predict responses to environmental change and test different in situ and ex situ conservation interventions for diverse taxa and ecosystems. Here we present a consensus list of 10 priority research themes. Within each theme we identify specific research questions (100 in total), answers to which will address conservation problems and should improve the management of biological resources. The themes frame a set of research questions related to the following: (i) adaptation and phenotypic plasticity; (ii) human-induced environmental change; (iii) human-wildlife interactions; (iv) invasive species; (v) methods, biomarkers and monitoring; (vi) policy, engagement and communication; (vii) pollution; (viii) restoration actions; (ix) threatened species; and (x) urban systems. The themes and questions will hopefully guide and inspire researchers while also helping to demonstrate to practitioners and policy makers the many ways in which physiology can help to support their decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven J Cooke
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
- Corresponding author: Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada.
| | - Jordanna N Bergman
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Christine L Madliger
- Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - Rebecca L Cramp
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
| | - John Beardall
- Securing Antarctica’s Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
| | - Gary Burness
- Department of Biology, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
| | - Timothy D Clark
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria 3216, Australia
| | - Ben Dantzer
- Department of Psychology, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Erick de la Barrera
- Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Morelia, Michoacán, 58190, Mexico
| | - Nann A Fangue
- Department of Wildlife, Fish & Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Craig E Franklin
- School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia
| | - Andrea Fuller
- Brain Function Research Group, School of Physiology, University of the Witwatersrand, 7 York Rd, Parktown, 2193, South Africa
| | - Lucy A Hawkes
- College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Hatherly Laboratories, University of Exeter, Prince of Wales Road, Exeter EX4 4PS, UK
| | - Kevin R Hultine
- Department of Research, Conservation and Collections, Desert Botanical Garden, Phoenix, AZ 85008, USA
| | - Kathleen E Hunt
- Smithsonian-Mason School of Conservation, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA
| | - Oliver P Love
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9B 3P4, Canada
| | - Heath A MacMillan
- Department of Biology and Institute of Biochemistry, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Dr., Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada
| | - John W Mandelman
- Anderson Cabot Center for Ocean Life, New England Aquarium, 1 Central Wharf, Boston, MA, 02110, USA
| | - Felix C Mark
- Department of Integrative Ecophysiology, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany
| | - Lynn B Martin
- Global Health and Infectious Disease Research, University of South Florida, 3720 Spectrum Boulevard, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
| | - Amy E M Newman
- Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1, Canada
| | - Adrienne B Nicotra
- Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601, Australia
| | - Graham D Raby
- Department of Biology, Trent University, 1600 West Bank Drive, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
| | - Sharon A Robinson
- School of Earth, Atmospheric and Life Sciences (SEALS) and Centre for Sustainable Ecosystem Solutions, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia
| | - Yan Ropert-Coudert
- Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé, CNRS UMR 7372—La Rochelle Université, 79360 Villiers-en-Bois, France
| | - Jodie L Rummer
- ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia
| | - Frank Seebacher
- School of Life and Environmental Sciences A08, University of Sydney, New South Wales 2006, Australia
| | - Anne E Todgham
- Department of Animal Science, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Sean Tomlinson
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia 5000, Australia
| | - Steven L Chown
- Securing Antarctica’s Environmental Future, School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
|
37
|
Schloesing E, Chambon R, Tran A, Choden K, Ravon S, Epstein JH, Hoem T, Furey N, Labadie M, Bourgarel M, De Nys HM, Caron A, Cappelle J. Patterns of foraging activity and fidelity in a southeast Asian flying fox. MOVEMENT ECOLOGY 2020; 8:46. [PMID: 33292573 PMCID: PMC7652672 DOI: 10.1186/s40462-020-00232-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improved understanding of the foraging ecology of bats in the face of ongoing habitat loss and modification worldwide is essential to their conservation and maintaining the substantial ecosystem services they provide. It is also fundamental to assessing potential transmission risks of zoonotic pathogens in human-wildlife interfaces. We evaluated the influence of environmental and behavioral variables on the foraging patterns of Pteropus lylei (a reservoir of Nipah virus) in a heterogeneous landscape in Cambodia. METHODS We employed an approach based on animal-movement modeling, which comprised a path-segmentation method (hidden Markov model) to identify individual foraging-behavior sequences in GPS data generated by eight P. lylei. We characterized foraging localities, foraging activity, and probability of returning to a given foraging locality over consecutive nights. Generalized linear mixed models were also applied to assess the influence of several variables including proxies for energetic costs and quality of foraging areas. RESULTS Bats performed few foraging bouts (area-restricted searches) during a given night, mainly in residential areas, and the duration of these decreased during the night. The probability of a bat revisiting a given foraging area within 48 h varied according to the duration previously spent there, its distance to the roost site, and the corresponding habitat type. We interpret these fine-scale patterns in relation to global habitat quality (including food-resource quality and predictability), habitat-familiarity and experience of each individual. CONCLUSIONS Our study provides evidence that heterogeneous human-made environments may promote complex patterns of foraging-behavior and short-term re-visitation in fruit bat species that occur in such landscapes. This highlights the need for similarly detailed studies to understand the processes that maintain biodiversity in these environments and assess the potential for pathogen transmission in human-wildlife interfaces.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elodie Schloesing
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
| | - Rémi Chambon
- Université de Rennes - unité BOREA (MNHN Sorbonne Université, CNRS, UCN, IRD UA), Rennes, France
| | - Annelise Tran
- UMR TETIS, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | | | | | | | - Thavry Hoem
- Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Neil Furey
- Fauna & Flora International (Cambodia), Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- Harrison Institute, Sevenoaks, UK
| | - Morgane Labadie
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Mathieu Bourgarel
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, RP-PCP, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Hélène M De Nys
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, RP-PCP, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Alexandre Caron
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Faculdade de Veterinaria, Universidade Eduardo Mondlane, Maputo, Mozambique
| | - Julien Cappelle
- UMR ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institut Pasteur du Cambodge, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
- UMR EPIA, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Greggor AL, Berger-Tal O, Blumstein DT. The Rules of Attraction: The Necessary Role of Animal Cognition in Explaining Conservation Failures and Successes. ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECOLOGY, EVOLUTION, AND SYSTEMATICS 2020. [DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-011720-103212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Integrating knowledge and principles of animal behavior into wildlife conservation and management has led to some concrete successes but has failed to improve conservation outcomes in other cases. Many conservation interventions involve attempts to either attract or repel animals, which we refer to as approach/avoidance issues. These attempts can be reframed as issues of manipulating the decisions animals make, which are driven by their perceptual abilities and attentional biases, as well as the value animals attribute to current stimuli and past learned experiences. These processes all fall under the umbrella of animal cognition. Here, we highlight rules that emerge when considering approach/avoidance conservation issues through the lens of cognitive-based management. For each rule, we review relevant conservation successes and failures to better predict the conditions in which behavior can be manipulated, and we suggest how to avoid future failures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alison L. Greggor
- Department of Recovery Ecology, Institute for Conservation Research, San Diego Zoo Global, Escondido, California 92027, USA
| | - Oded Berger-Tal
- Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Midreshet Ben-Gurion 8499000, Israel
| | - Daniel T. Blumstein
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hammond TT, Curtis MJ, Jacobs LE, Tobler MW, Swaisgood RR, Shier DM. Behavior and detection method influence detection probability of a translocated, endangered amphibian. Anim Conserv 2020. [DOI: 10.1111/acv.12645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Leah E. Jacobs
- San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research Escondido CA USA
| | | | | | - Debra M. Shier
- San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research Escondido CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Monier SA, Veit RR, Manne LL. Changes in positive associations among vertebrate predators at South Georgia during winter. Polar Biol 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s00300-020-02720-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
AbstractWe studied positive associations among seabirds and marine mammals at South Georgia on research cruises during the Austral winters of 1985, 1991 and 1993 and found statistically significant differences. We collected data on abundance and distribution, providing a critical reference for sub-Antarctic conservation in anticipation of future environmental changes. We found significant changes in the abundance of 29% of species surveyed and a consequent change in species diversity. We postulate that the resulting altered community composition may have previously unanticipated population effects on the component species, due to changes in positive interactions among species which use each other as cues to the presence of prey. We found a near threefold reduction in spatial overlap among vertebrate predators, associated with warming sea temperatures. As the strength and opportunity for positive associations decreases in the future, feeding success may be negatively impacted. In this way, environmental changes may disproportionately impact predator abundances and such changes are likely already underway, as Southern Ocean temperatures have increased substantially since our surveys. Of course the changes we describe are not solely due to changing sea temperature or any other single cause—many factors are important and we do not claim to have removed these from consideration. Rather, we report previously undocumented changes in positive associations among species, and argue these changes may continue into the future, given near-certain continued increases in climate-related changes.
Collapse
|
41
|
|
42
|
Mettke-Hofmann C, Eccles GR, Greggor AL, Bethell EJ. Cognition in a Changing World: Red-Headed Gouldian Finches Enter Spatially Unfamiliar Habitats More Readily Than Do Black-Headed Birds. Front Ecol Evol 2020. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.498347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
43
|
Merrill E, Killeen J, Pettit J, Trottier M, Martin H, Berg J, Bohm H, Eggeman S, Hebblewhite M. Density-Dependent Foraging Behaviors on Sympatric Winter Ranges in a Partially Migratory Elk Population. Front Ecol Evol 2020. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2020.00269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
|
44
|
McBrayer LD, Orton RW, Kinsey CT, Neel LK. Conservation and Management Strategies Create Opportunities for Integrative Organismal Research. Integr Comp Biol 2020; 60:509-521. [PMID: 32531064 DOI: 10.1093/icb/icaa069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Conservation and management activities are geared toward the achievement of particular goals for a specific species, or groups of species, at the population level or higher. Conversely, organismal or functional research is typically organized by hypothesis tests or descriptive work that examines a broader theory studying individual organismal traits. Here, we outline how integrative organismal biologists might conduct mutually beneficial and meaningful research to inform or assist conservation and management biologists. We argue that studies of non-target species are very useful to both groups because non-target species can meet the goals of managers and organismal biologists alike, while also informing the other. We highlight our work on a threatened lizard species' thermal physiology, behavior, and color pattern-all of which are impacted by species management plans for sympatric, threatened, bird species. We show that management practices affect activity time, thermal adaptation, and substrate use, while also altering predation rates, crypsis, ectoparasite load, and sexual coloration in the study species. These case studies exemplify the challenges of conservation and management efforts for threatened or endangered species in that non-target species can be both positively and negatively affected by those efforts. Yet, the collaboration of organismal biologists with conservation and management efforts provides a productive system for mutually informative research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lance D McBrayer
- Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA
| | - Richard W Orton
- Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, 337 Life Science Building, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
| | - Chase T Kinsey
- Department of Biological Sciences, 132 Long Hall, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA
| | - Lauren K Neel
- School of Life Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Tanalgo KC, Monfort N, Hughes AC. Attacked from above and below: new ethological evidence on the predation strategies of corvid and varanid on a cave-roosting bat. ETHOL ECOL EVOL 2020. [DOI: 10.1080/03949370.2020.1771773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Krizler Cejuela Tanalgo
- Landscape Ecology Group, Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 666303 Mengla, Yunnan Province, P.R. China (E-mail: )
| | - Norma Monfort
- Philippine Bats for Peace Foundation Inc., 5 Ramona Townhomes, Guadalupe Village, Lanang, 8000 Davao City, The Republic of the Philippines
| | - Alice Catherine Hughes
- Landscape Ecology Group, Center for Integrative Conservation, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 666303 Mengla, Yunnan Province, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Maslo B, Burkhalter JC, Bushek D, Yuhas T, Schumm B, Burger J, Lockwood JL. Assessing conservation conflict: Does intertidal oyster aquaculture inhibit foraging behavior of migratory shorebirds? Ecosphere 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Maslo
- Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey 08901 USA
| | | | - David Bushek
- Haskin Shellfish Research Lab New Jersey Agricultural Experiment Station Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Port Norris New Jersey 08349 USA
| | - Tanner Yuhas
- Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey 08901 USA
| | - Brian Schumm
- Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey 08901 USA
| | - Joanna Burger
- Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey 08901 USA
- Division of Life Sciences Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey Piscataway New Jersey 08854 USA
| | - Julie L. Lockwood
- Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey New Brunswick New Jersey 08901 USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hale R, Blumstein DT, Mac Nally R, Swearer SE. Harnessing knowledge of animal behavior to improve habitat restoration outcomes. Ecosphere 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.3104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Hale
- School of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria 3010 Australia
| | - Daniel T. Blumstein
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and the Institute of the Environment and Sustainability University of California Los Angeles Los Angeles California USA
| | - Ralph Mac Nally
- School of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria 3010 Australia
| | - Stephen E. Swearer
- School of BioSciences The University of Melbourne Parkville Victoria 3010 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dey CJ, Rego AI, Midwood JD, Koops MA. A review and meta-analysis of collaborative research prioritization studies in ecology, biodiversity conservation and environmental science. Proc Biol Sci 2020; 287:20200012. [PMID: 32183628 PMCID: PMC7126043 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Collaborative research prioritization (CRP) studies have become increasingly popular during the last decade. By bringing together a diverse group of stakeholders, and using a democratic process to create a list of research priorities, these methods purport to identify research topics that will better meet the needs of science users. Here, we review 41 CRP studies in the fields of ecology, biodiversity conservation and environmental science that collectively identify 2031 research priorities. We demonstrate that climate change, ecosystem services and protected areas are common terms found in the research priorities of many CRP studies, and that identified research priorities have become less unique over time. In addition, we show that there is a considerable variation in the size and composition of the groups involved in CRP studies, and that at least one aspect of the identified research priorities (lexical diversity) is related to the size of the CRP group. Although some CRP studies have been highly cited, the evidence that CRP studies have directly motivated research is weak, perhaps because most CRP studies have not directly involved organizations that fund science. We suggest that the most important impact of CRP studies may lie in their ability to connect individuals across sectors and help to build diverse communities of practice around important issues at the science-policy interface.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cody J. Dey
- Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, 867 Lakeshore Road, Burlington, Ontario, CanadaL7S 1A1
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Collisions between birds and aircraft pose a severe threat to aviation and avian safety. To understand and prevent these bird strikes, knowledge about the factors leading to these bird strikes is vital. However, even though it is a global issue, data availability strongly varies and is difficult to put into a global picture. This paper aims to close this gap by providing an in-depth review of studies and statistics to obtain a concise overview of the bird strike problem in commercial aviation on an international level. The paper illustrates the factors contributing to the occurrence and the potential consequences in terms of effect on flight and damage. This is followed by a presentation of the risk-reducing measures currently in place as well as their limitations. The paper closes with an insight into current research investigating novel methods to prevent bird strikes.
Collapse
|
50
|
Potential Distribution of the Critically Endangered Chinese Pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) in Different Land Covers of Nepal: Implications for Conservation. SUSTAINABILITY 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/su12031282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Anthropogenic activities have driven many wildlife species towards extinction. Among these species, the geographic distributions of many are poorly documented, which can limit the effectiveness of conservation. The critically endangered Chinese pangolin (Manis pentadactyla) is experiencing population decline throughout its range due to land-use changes and illegal trade for food and traditional medicine. Using distribution records and maximum entropy modeling, we predicted the potential distribution of the Chinese pangolin across Nepal. Most suitable potential habitats of the Chinese pangolin occurred in forest areas of the mid-hill region in central and eastern Nepal, followed by cultivated land. Almost all potential suitable habitats of the Chinese pangolin occurred outside of protected areas, and most of them were encroached upon by cultivated land, human settlements, and infrastructure developments. The results from this study provide baseline information on the potential suitable habitats of the Chinese pangolin in Nepal, which helps to develop site- and species-specific management plans and to identify priority areas to minimize the current threats to the pangolin and enhance the stewardship of species conservation.
Collapse
|