Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging in Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System 4 Breast Lesions: A Prediction Model for Malignancy

A Prediction Model for Assessing the Efficacy of Thermal Ablation in Treating Benign Thyroid Nodules ≥ 2 cm: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

To develop and validate a prediction model utilizing clinical and ultrasound (US) data for preoperative assessment of efficacy following US-guided thermal ablation (TA) in patients with benign thyroid nodules (BTNs) ≥ 2 cm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 962 patients with 1011 BTNs who underwent TA at four tertiary centers between May 2018 and July 2022. Ablation efficacy was categorized into therapeutic success (volume reduction rate [VRR] > 50%) and non-therapeutic success (VRR ≤ 50%). We identified independent factors influencing the ablation efficacy of BTNs ≥ 2 cm in the training set using multivariate logistic regression. On this basis, a prediction model was established. The performance of model was further evaluated by discrimination (area under the curve [AUC]) in the validation set.

RESULTS

Of the 1011 nodules included, 952 (94.2%) achieved therapeutic success at the 12-month follow-up after TA. Independent factors influencing VRR > 50% included sex, nodular composition, calcification, volume, and largest diameter (all p < 0.05). The prediction equation was established as follows: p = 1/1 + Exp∑[8.113 -2.720 × (if predominantly solid) -2.790 × (if solid) -1.275 × (if 10 mL < volume ≤ 30mL) -1.743 × (if volume > 30 mL) -1.268 × (if with calcification) -2.859 × (if largest diameter > 3 cm) +1.143 × (if female)]. This model showed great discrimination, with AUC of 0.908 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.868-0.947) and 0.850 (95% CI: 0.748-0.952) in the training and validation sets, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A clinical prediction model was successfully developed to preoperatively predict the therapeutic success of BTNs larger than 2 cm in size following US-guided TA. This model aids physicians in evaluating treatment efficacy and devising personalized prognostic plans.

Multimodal ultrasound assessment of mass and non-mass enhancements by MRI: Diagnostic accuracy in idiopathic granulomatous mastitis and breast cancer

PURPOSE

Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) poses diagnostic challenges due to its diverse clinical and radiological presentations, often mimicking malignancies. This study aimed to assess the diagnostic efficacy of multimodal ultrasound for mass and non-mass enhancements in Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) of IGM and breast cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis involved patients confirmed histopathologically with IGM and BC. All patients underwent conventional ultrasound (C-US), ultrasound elastography (UE), contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and DCE-MRI examinations. Blinded experienced radiologists assessed imaging findings. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity were calculated for mass and non-mass enhancements.

RESULTS

For mass enhancements (ME), multimodal ultrasound demonstrated strong efficacy (AUC = 0.8651, 95 % CI: 0.7431 to 0.9871), exhibiting high sensitivity (83.3 %) and specificity (92.4 %) in differentiating IGM from breast cancer. However, for non-mass enhancements (NME), multimodal ultrasound showed limited accuracy (AUC = 0.6306) with lower sensitivity (65.6 %) and specificity (81.2 %) in distinguishing between IGM and breast cancer.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal ultrasound displayed good diagnostic efficacy for mass enhancements in DCE-MRI for IGM and breast cancer, while for non-mass enhancement patterns, DCE-MRI remains the most valuable radiological modality for comprehensively assessing this condition's complexities.

Improving ultrasound diagnostic Precision for breast cancer and adenosis with modality-specific enhancement (MSE) - Breast Net

Adenosis is a benign breast condition whose lesions can mimic breast carcinoma and is evaluated for malignancy with the Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). We construct and validate the performance of modality-specific enhancement (MSE)-Breast Net based on multimodal ultrasound images and compare it to the BI-RADS in differentiating adenosis from breast cancer. A total of 179 patients with breast carcinoma and 229 patients with adenosis were included in this retrospective, two-institution study, then divided into a training cohort (institution I, n = 292) and a validation cohort (institution II, n = 116). In the training cohort, the final model had a significantly greater AUC (0.82; P < 0.05) than B-mode-based model (0.69, 95% CI [0.49-0.90]). In the validation cohort, the AUC of the final model was 0.81, greater than that of the BI-RADS (0.75, P < 0.05). The multimodal model outperformed the individual and bimodal models, reaching a significantly greater AUC of 0.87 (95% CI = 0.69-1.0) (P < 0.05). MSE-Breast Net, based on multimodal ultrasound images, exhibited better diagnostic performance than the BI-RADS in differentiating adenosis from breast cancer and may contribute to clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Spatiotemporal analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for differentiating between malignant and benign breast lesions

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to apply spatiotemporal analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) loops to quantify the enhancement heterogeneity for improving the differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 120 women (age range, 18-82 years; mean, 52 years) scheduled for ultrasound-guided biopsy. With the aid of brightness-mode images, the border of each breast lesion was delineated in the CEUS images. Based on visual evaluation and quantitative metrics, the breast lesions were categorized into four grades of different levels of contrast enhancement. Grade-1 (hyper-enhanced) and grade-2 (partly-enhanced) breast lesions were included in the analysis. Four parameters reflecting enhancement heterogeneity were estimated by spatiotemporal analysis of neighboring time-intensity curves (TICs). By setting the threshold on mean parameter, the diagnostic performance of the four parameters for differentiating benign and malignant lesions was evaluated.

RESULTS

Sixty-four of the 120 patients were categorized as grade 1 or 2 and used for estimating the four parameters. At the pixel level, mutual information and conditional entropy present significantly different values between the benign and malignant lesions (p < 0.001 in patients of grade 1, p = 0.002 in patients of grade 1 or 2). For the classification of breast lesions, mutual information produces the best diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.893 in patients of grade 1, AUC = 0.848 in patients of grade 1 or 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed spatiotemporal analysis for assessing the enhancement heterogeneity shows promising results to aid in the diagnosis of breast cancer by CEUS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The proposed spatiotemporal method can be developed as a standardized software to automatically quantify the enhancement heterogeneity of breast cancer on CEUS, possibly leading to the improved diagnostic accuracy of differentiation between benign and malignant lesions.

KEY POINTS

• Advanced spatiotemporal analysis of ultrasound contrast-enhanced loops for aiding the differentiation of malignant or benign breast lesions. • Four parameters reflecting the enhancement heterogeneity were estimated in the hyper- and partly-enhanced breast lesions by analyzing the neighboring pixel-level time-intensity curves. • For the classification of hyper-enhanced breast lesions, mutual information produces the best diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.893).

Preoperative prediction of extrathyroidal extension: radiomics signature based on multimodal ultrasound to papillary thyroid carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is a recognized need for additional approaches to improve the accuracy of extrathyroidal extension (ETE) diagnosis in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) before surgery. Up to now, multimodal ultrasound has been widely applied in disease diagnosis. We investigated the value of radiomic features extracted from multimodal ultrasound in the preoperative prediction of ETE.

METHODS

We retrospectively pathologically confirmed PTC lesions in 235 patients from January 2019 to April 2022 in our hospital, including 45 ETE lesions and 205 non-ETE lesions. MaZda software was employed to obtain radiomics parameters in multimodal sonography. The most valuable radiomics features were selected by the Fisher coefficient, mutual information, probability of classification error and average correlation coefficient methods (F + MI + PA) in combination with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method. Finally, the multimodal model was developed by incorporating the clinical records and radiomics features through fivefold cross-validation with a linear support vector machine algorithm. The predictive performance was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 scores and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in the training and test sets.

RESULTS

A total of 5972 radiomics features were extracted from multimodal sonography, and the 13 most valuable radiomics features were selected from the training set using the F + MI + PA method combined with LASSO regression. The multimodal prediction model yielded AUCs of 0.911 (95% CI 0.866-0.957) and 0.716 (95% CI 0.522-0.910) in the cross-validation and test sets, respectively. The multimodal model and radiomics model showed good discrimination between ETE and non-ETE lesions.

CONCLUSION

Radiomics features based on multimodal ultrasonography could play a promising role in detecting ETE before surgery.

Added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound to conventional ultrasound for characterization of indeterminate soft-tissue tumors

OBJECTIVE

To assess the added value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) to conventional ultrasound in differentiating benign soft-tissue tumors from malignant ones.

METHODS

197 soft-tissue tumors underwent ultrasound examination with confirmed histopathology were retrospectively evaluated. The radiologists classified all the tumors as benign, malignant, or indeterminate according to ultrasound features. The indeterminate tumors underwent CEUS were reviewed afterwards for malignancy identification by using individual and combined CEUS features.

RESULTS

Ultrasound analysis classified 62 soft-tissue tumors as benign, 111 tumors as indeterminate and 24 tumors as malignant. There 104 indeterminate tumors were subject to CEUS. Three CEUS features including enlargement of enhancement area, infiltrative enhancement boundary, and intratumoral arrival time difference were significantly associated with the tumor nature in both univariable and multivariable analysis for the indeterminate tumors (all p < 0.05). When at least one out of the three discriminant CEUS features were present, the best sensitivity of 100% for malignancy identification was obtained with the specificity of 66.7% and the AUC of 0.833. When at least two of the three discriminant CEUS features were present, the best area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.924 for malignancy identification was obtained. The combination of at least two discriminant CEUS features showed much better diagnostic performance than the optimal combination of ultrasound features in terms of AUC (0.924 vs 0.608, p < 0.0001), sensitivity (94.0% vs 42.0%, p < 0.0001), and specificity (90.7% vs 79.6%, p = 0.210) for the indeterminate tumors.

CONCLUSION

The combination CEUS features of enlargement of enhancement area, infiltrative enhancement boundary and intratumoral arrival time difference are valuable to improve the discriminating performance for indeterminate soft-tissue tumors on conventional ultrasound.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The combination of peritumoral and arrival-time CEUS features can improve the discriminating performance for indeterminate soft-tissue tumors on conventional ultrasound.

Evaluation of diagnostic efficacy of multimode ultrasound in BI-RADS 4 breast neoplasms and establishment of a predictive model

Objectives

To explore the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound (US), two-dimensional and three-dimensional shear-wave elastography (2D-SWE and 3D-SWE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in breast neoplasms in category 4 based on the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) from the American College of Radiology (ACR) and to develop a risk-prediction nomogram based on the optimal combination to provide a reference for the clinical management of BI-RADS 4 breast neoplasms.

Methods

From September 2021 to April 2022, a total of 104 breast neoplasms categorized as BI-RADS 4 by US were included in this prospective study. There were 78 breast neoplasms randomly assigned to the training cohort; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC), 95% confidence interval (95% CI), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 2D-SWE, 3D-SWE, CEUS, and their combination were analyzed and compared. The optimal combination was selected to develop a risk-prediction nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was assessed by a validation cohort of 26 neoplasms.

Results

Of the 78 neoplasms in the training cohort, 16 were malignant and 62 were benign. Among the 26 neoplasms in the validation cohort, 6 were malignant and 20 were benign. The AUC values of 2D-SWE, 3D-SWE, and CEUS were not significantly different. After a comparison of the different combinations, 2D-SWE+CEUS showed the optimal performance. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression was used to filter the variables in this combination, and the variables included Emax, Eratio, enhancement mode, perfusion defect, and area ratio. Then, a risk-prediction nomogram with BI-RADS was built. The performance of the nomogram was better than that of the radiologists in the training cohort (AUC: 0.974 vs. 0.863). In the validation cohort, there was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between the nomogram and the experienced radiologists (AUC: 0.946 vs. 0.842).

Conclusions

US, 2D-SWE, 3D-SWE, CEUS, and their combination could improve the diagnostic efficiency of BI-RADS 4 breast neoplasms. The diagnostic efficacy of US+3D-SWE was not better than US+2D-SWE. US+2D-SWE+CEUS showed the optimal diagnostic performance. The nomogram based on US+2D-SWE+CEUS performs well.

Non-mass Breast Lesions: Could Multimodal Ultrasound Imaging Be Helpful for Their Diagnosis?

Objective: To develop a prediction model for discriminating malignant from benign breast non-mass-like lesions (NMLs) using conventional ultrasound (US), strain elastography (SE) of US elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Methods: A total of 101 NMLs from 100 patients detected by conventional US were enrolled in this retrospective study. The characteristics of NMLs in conventional US, SE and CEUS were compared between malignant and benign NMLs. Histopathological results were used as the reference standard. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent risk factors. A multimodal method to evaluate NMLs based on logistic regression was developed. The diagnostic performance of conventional US, US + SE, US + CEUS and the combination of these modalities was evaluated and compared. Results: Among the 101 lesions, 50 (49.5%) were benign and 51 (50.5%) were malignant. Age ≥45 y, microcalcifications in the lesion, elasticity score >3, earlier enhancement time and hyper-enhancement were independent diagnostic indicators included to establish the multimodal prediction method. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of US + SE + CEUS was significantly higher than that of US (p < 0.0001) and US + SE (p < 0.0001), but there was no significant difference between the AUC of US + SE + CEUS and the AUC of US + CEUS (p = 0.216). Conclusion: US + SE + CEUS and US + CEUS could significantly improve the diagnostic efficiency and accuracy of conventional US in the diagnosis of NMLs.

Multi-parameter ultrasonography-based predictive model for breast cancer diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

To develop, validate, and evaluate a predictive model for breast cancer diagnosis using conventional ultrasonography (US), shear wave elastography (SWE), and contrast-enhanced US (CEUS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 674 patients with 674 breast lesions. The data, a main and an independent datasets, were divided into three cohorts. Cohort 1 (80% of the main dataset; n = 448) was analyzed by logistic regression analysis to identify risk factors and establish the predictive model. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was analyzed in Cohort 2 (20% of the main dataset; n = 119) to validate and in Cohort 3 (the independent dataset; n = 107) to evaluate the predictive model.

RESULTS

Multivariable regression analysis revealed nine independent breast cancer risk factors, including age > 40 years; ill-defined margin, heterogeneity, rich blood flow, and abnormal axillary lymph nodes on US; enhanced area enlargement, contrast agent retention, and irregular shape on CEUS; mean SWE higher than the cutoff value (P < 0.05 for all). The diagnostic performance of the model was good, with AUC values of 0.847, 0.857, and 0.774 for Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The model increased the diagnostic specificity (from 31% to 81.3% and 7.3% to 73.1% in cohorts 2 and 3, respectively) without a significant loss in sensitivity (from 100.0% to 90.1% and 100.0% to 81.8% in cohorts 2 and 3, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The multi-parameter US-based model showed good performance in breast cancer diagnosis, improving specificity without a significant loss in sensitivity. Using the model could reduce unnecessary biopsies and guide clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Color-map virtual touch tissue imaging (CMV) combined with BI-RADS for the diagnosis of breast lesions

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the importance of color-map virtual touch tissue imaging (CMV) in assisting Breast Imaging Reporting and Data Systems (BI-RADS) in diagnosing malignant breast lesions.

METHODS

A dataset included 134 patients and 146 breast lesions was assembled. All patients underwent biopsy or surgical excision of breast lesions, and pathological results were obtained. All patients with breast lesions also underwent conventional ultrasound (US) and CMV. Each lesion was assigned a CMV score based on the color pattern of the lesion and surrounding breast tissue and a BI-RADS classification rating based on US characteristics. We compared the diagnostic performance of using BI-RADS and CMV separately and their combination.

RESULTS

BI-RADS (odds ratio [OR]: 3.665; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.147, 6.258) and CMV (OR: 6.616; 95% CI: 2.272, 19.270) were independent predictors of breast malignancy (all P < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for either CMV or BI-RADS alone was inferior to that of the combination (0.877 vs. 0.962; 0.938 vs. 0.962; all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The performance of BI-RADS in diagnosing breast lesions is significantly improved by combining CMV. Therefore, we recommend CMV as an adjunct to BI-RADS.