Real-World Impact of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Radical Cystectomy on Perioperative Outcomes and Spending

Two-year resource utilization of open vs. robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Results from optum's de-identified clinformatics® data mart database

PURPOSE

Despite increasing adoption of robotic radical cystectomy (RRC), its cost-effectiveness remains in question. Therefore, we aimed to compare 2-year resource utilization (RU) between RRC and open radical cystectomy (ORC).

METHODS

Queried from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database, patients diagnosed with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy were identified between 2014 and 2017. Patients with ≥2 years of continuous enrollment were stratified by open and robotic approach. RU was evaluated from incident hospitalization costs and total standardized costs over 2 years for each subsequent inpatient/outpatient visit. Multivariate generalized linear regression (MGLR) was used to determine the impact of surgical approach on subsequent RU.

RESULTS

About 2,373 patients were identified. Of patients with continuous enrollment for ≥2 years (N = 1353), 798 (59%) underwent RRC and 555 (41%) underwent ORC. RRC was associated with lower RU than ORC, ($65,188.02 vs. $80,375.90, P < 0.0001) and lower inpatient costs for incident hospitalization ($29,142 vs. $42,329, P < 0.001). RRC, versus ORC, demonstrated shorter median length of hospital stay (5 vs. 7 days, P < 0.0001), and was associated with lower rates of acute kidney failure (3% vs. 5%, P = 0.007), ileus (2% vs. 5%, P = 0.005) and blood transfusions (≤ 2% vs. 6%, P < 0.001). MGLR demonstrated that robotic approach independently reduced total cost (β 0.84, CI 0.77-0.93, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

RRC is associated with reduced 2-year RU and incident hospitalization costs compared to ORC. Robotic technique was independently associated with lower total costs. While granular cost metric details are limited, the reduced RU with RRC represents a novel assessment of reduced postoperative morbidity.

Total extra-peritoneal approach to radical cystectomy with ureterostomy: A novel technique for the elderly and frail

OBJECTIVES

Radical cystectomy with urinary diversion is the gold standard treatment for bladder cancer (high-risk/muscle invasive). The transperitoneal approach is associated with significant gastrointestinal complications like ileus. In the elderly and frail with a single functional kidney, we describe an extraperitoneal technique of radical cystectomy, with a ureterostomy, to be performed without general anesthesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The elderly, frail, and high-risk candidates for general anesthesia, with a prior history of nephroureterectomy with a second primary muscle-invasive bladder cancer, were chosen. All patients underwent the described procedure under combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. The posterior dissection was retrograde, caudal to cranial, with the peritoneum being opened only for resection of the dome. A cutaneous ureterostomy was fashioned on the side of the functional kidney. Peri-operative parameters were assessed for early recovery in this high-risk group.

RESULTS

The mean age was 82 years (range: 73-91), with Charleson Comorbidity Index 5, and were all deemed unfit for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. With a median duration of 127.5 minutes, an average blood loss of 225ml, and no patient requiring general anesthesia; early ambulation, early return of bowel function, and a lesser hospital stay (7 days) with minimal morbidity were achieved. Negative surgical margins were achieved in all cases, with a mean harvest of 29 lymph nodes. Only 1 patient developed stomal stenosis. The cause-specific survival (CSS) is 100% at 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The highlighting features are the early return of bowel function (flatus passage on day 1) and the avoidance of the cardio-pulmonary complications of general anesthesia. The extraperitoneal cystectomy offers a promising alternative in this select group and warrants further studies to extrapolate this technique for bilateral urinary drainage.

Comparisons of in-hospital fee and surgical outcomes between robot-assisted, laparoscopic, and open radical cystectomy: a Japanese nationwide study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate in-hospital fees and surgical outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC), laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) and open radical cystectomy (ORC) using a Japanese nationwide database.

METHODS

All data were obtained from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database between April 2020 and March 2022. Basic characteristics and perioperative indicators, including in-hospital fees, were compared among the RARC, LRC and ORC groups. Propensity score-matched comparisons were performed to assess the differences between RARC and ORC.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2931, 1311 and 2435 cases of RARC, LRC and ORC were identified, respectively. The RARC group had the lowest in-hospital fee (median: 2.38 million yen), the shortest hospital stay (26 days) and the lowest blood transfusion rate (29.5%), as well as the lowest complication rate (20.9%), despite having the longest anesthesia time (569 min) among the three groups (all P < 0.01). The outcomes of LRC were comparable with those of RARC, and the differences in these indicators between the RARC and ORC groups were greater than those between the RARC and LRC groups. In propensity score-matched comparisons between the RARC and ORC groups, the differences in the indicators remained significant (all P < 0.01), with an ~50 000 yen difference in in-hospital fees.

CONCLUSIONS

RARC and LRC were considered to be more cost-effective surgeries than ORC due to their superior surgical outcomes and comparable surgical fees in Japan. The widespread adoption of RARC and LRC is expected to bring economic benefits to Japanese society.

Perioperative outcomes of open versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy in octogenarians: a population based analysis

Octogenarians undergoing cystectomy experience higher morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients. Though the non-inferiority of robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) compared to open radical cystectomy (ORC) has been established in a generalized population, the benefits of the robotic approach have not been well studied in an aged population. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for all patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer from 2010 to 2016. Of these, 2527 were performed in patients age 80 or older; 1988 and 539 underwent ORC and RARC, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, RARC was associated with significantly reduced odds for both 30- and 90-day mortality (HR 0.404, p = 0.004; HR 0.694, p = 0.031, respectively), though the association with overall mortality was not significant (HR 0.877, p = 0.061). The robotic group had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) compared to open surgery (10.3 days ORC vs. 9.3 days RARC, p = 0.028). The proportion of cases performed robotically increased over the study period from 12.2% in 2010 to 28.4% in 2016 (p = 0.009, R2 = 0.774). The study is limited by a retrospective design and a section bias, which was not completely control for in the analysis. In conclusion, RARC provides improved perioperative outcomes in aged patients compared to ORC and a trend toward greater utilization of this technique was observed.

Bayesian network analysis of long-term oncologic outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer

BACKGROUND

To understand the long-term oncologic outcomes of open radical cystectomy (ORC) versus laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) versus robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) for bladder cancer (BCa). Therefore, we performed the conventional meta-analysis and network meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes of ORC, LRC, and RARC for BCa.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Medline, and Web of science was performed up until July 1, 2021. Long-term oncologic outcomes include the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate, the 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate, and the 5-year cancer specific-survival (CSS) rate. The Bayesian network analysis has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020208396).

RESULTS

We found that 10 articles (including 3228 patients) were included in our Bayesian network analysis. No significant differences were found between ORC, LRC, and RARC in long-term oncologic outcomes in either direct meta-analysis or network meta-analysis. Therefore, the clinical effects of 5-year OS, RFS, and CSS of RARC, LRC, and ORC are similar. But LRC may be ranked first in 5-year OS, RFS, and CSS compared to other surgical approaches by probabilistic analysis ranking via Bayesian network analysis.

CONCLUSION

We found that there were no statistical differences in the 3 surgical approaches of RAPC, LPC, and OPC for Bca in long-term oncologic outcomes by direct meta-analysis. However, Subtle differences between these surgical approaches can be concluded that LRC may be a better surgical approach than RARC or ORC in long-term oncologic outcomes by probabilistic analysis ranking via Bayesian network analysis. Moreover, we need a large sample size and more high-quality studies to improve and verify further.

Narcotic Avoidance After Robotic Radical Cystectomy Allows Routine of Only Two-Day Hospital Stay

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcomes of a narcotic-sparing clinical pathway after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with ileal conduit targeting discharge on postoperative day #2 and report postoperative narcotic consumption, pain scores, and the resulting length of stay (LOS).

METHODS

We reviewed a single-surgeon series of consecutive RARCs between August 2015-September 2020. Acetaminophen and ketorolac were given with thorough patient education reserving oral narcotics for breakthrough pain. Intravenous narcotics were intentionally excluded from postoperative orders. Alvimopan was given once it became available. Subcutaneous ropivacaine pain pumps were removed before discharge. Discharge criteria included diet, oral analgesia, ambulation, and bowel function. Narcotic use and pain scores were evaluated to deternine the success of the applied narcotic-avoidance strategy.

RESULTS

None of the 54 patients required intravenous narcotics postoperatively, and 19 patients (35%) never required even oral narcotics. Mean pain scores were higher in patients who required oral narcotics (4.3/11 vs 3.0/11, p=0.001, respectively). Among 35 patients who received narcotics, mean tablets taken were 4.3/day (range, 1-13) with 68% using 8 or less tablets during their entire LOS. Mean LOS was 2.1d (range 1-4). Five patients (9%) were discharged on POD#1, 37/54 (68.5%) on POD #2, 10/54 (18.5%) on POD#3 and 2/54 (4%) on POD #4. Eight patients (15%) were readmitted within 90 days.

CONCLUSION

Minimizing narcotics after RARC with conduit allowed for a 2-day LOS in the majority of patients and the shortest ever reported mean LOS after cystectomy, essentially halving hospitalization time. Patient education is critical to minimizing narcotic usage.

A 25-year perspective on advances in an understanding of the biology, evaluation, treatment and future directions/challenges of urothelial cancer

The Urologic Oncology Journal was founded 25 years ago and we reviewed the literature since that time in the area of urothelial cancer to see the progress and pitfalls we have made over this time period. A comprehensive literature search was conducted by the authors involved who are all actively involved in research, clinical trials, and treatment for urothelial cancer and the results were summarized over the past 25 years. The field of urothelial cancer has evolved tremendously in the last 25 years with the incorporation of molecular subtyping, novel imaging, immunotherapy, and robotic surgery. However, treatments such as BCG and radical cystectomy have remained steadfast over the last 25 years. Although we have a better understanding of the biology of bladder cancer, we still have a long way from being able to cure patients with bladder cancer and eliminate morbidity from treatments. Nevertheless, considerable progress has been made since the founding of the Urologic Oncology Journal 25 years ago.

Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Cystectomy in a Laparoscopic Naïve Center

Background

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy is a challenging surgical procedure; however, it has been largely abandoned in favor of the more intuitive robotic-assisted cystectomy. Due to the prohibitive cost of robotic surgery, the adoption of laparoscopic cystectomy is of relevance in low-resource institutes. Methodology. This is a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) to open radical cystectomy (ORC) at a single institute. Each group included thirty patients. The trial was designed to compare both approaches regarding operative time, blood loss, transfusion requirements, length of hospital stay, time to oral intake, requirement of opioid analgesia, and complications.

Results

LRC was associated with less hospital stay (9.8 vs. 13.8 days, P=0.001), less time to oral solid intake (6 vs. 8.6 days, P=0.031), and lower opioid requirements (23.3% vs. 53.3%, P=0.033). There was a trend towards lower blood loss and transfusion requirements, but this did not reach statistical significance. Overall complication rates were comparable.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic radical cystectomy was associated with comparable postoperative outcomes when compared to ORC in the first laparoscopic cystectomy experience in our center. Benefitting from the assistance of an experienced laparoscopic surgeon is recommended to shorten the learning curve.

Robotic assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a review of what we do and don't know

Radical cystectomy (RC) is the gold standard treatment for muscle-invasive and high-risk, noninvasive bladder cancer. Since 2003, robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has been gaining popularity. Metanalyses show that the primary advantage of RARC is less blood loss and the primary advantage of open radical cystectomy (ORC) is shorter operative times. There do not appear to be significant differences in complications, cancer-related outcomes or survival between the two approaches. Cost analyses comparing RARC and ORC are complicated by the often-ill-defined distinction between the cost to the hospital versus the cost to payors. However, it is likely that for both hospitals and payors, RARC is cost effective at high-volume centers. It is feasible that in the future, increased experience with RARC will lead to improved outcomes and justify the use of RARC over ORC.

Survival after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Multicenter comparison between minimally invasive and open approaches

Objective

To investigate oncological outcomes in patients with bladder cancer who underwent minimally invasive radical cystectomy (MIRC) or open radical cystectomy (ORC).

Methods

We identified patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy (RC) in 13 centers of the Chinese Bladder Cancer Consortium (CBCC). Perioperative outcomes were compared between MIRC and ORC. The influence of surgical approaches on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in the entire study group and subgroups classified according to pathologic stage or lymph node (LN) status was assessed with the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association among OS, CSS and risk factors of interest.

Results

Of 2 098 patients who underwent RC, 1 243 patients underwent MIRC (1 087 laparoscopic RC and 156 robotic-assisted RC, respectively), while 855 patients underwent ORC. No significant differences were noted in positive surgical margin rate and 90-day postoperative mortality rate. MIRC was associated with less estimated blood loss, more LN yield, higher rate of neobladder diversion, longer operative time, and longer length of hospital stay. There was no significant difference in OS and CSS according to surgical approaches (p=0.653, and 0.816, respectively). Subgroup analysis revealed that OS and CSS were not significantly different regardless of the status of extravesical involvement or LN involvement. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that the surgical approach was not a significant predictor of OS and CSS.

Conclusions

Our study showed that MIRC was comparable to conventional ORC in terms of OS and CSS.

Minimally invasive versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of minimally invasive radical cystectomy (MIRC) versus open radical cystectomy (ORC) for bladder cancer.

Methods

We searched the EMBASE and MEDLINE databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of MIRC versus ORC in the treatment of bladder cancer.

Results

Eight articles describing nine RCTs (803 patients) were analyzed. No significant differences were found between MIRC and ORC in two oncologic outcomes: the recurrence rate and mortality. Additionally, no significant differences were found in three pathologic outcomes: lymph node yield, positive lymph nodes, and positive surgical margins. With respect to perioperative outcomes, however, MIRC showed a significantly longer operating time, less estimated blood loss, lower blood transfusion rate, shorter time to regular diet, and shorter length of hospital stay than ORC. The incidence of complications was similar between the two techniques. We found no statistically significant differences in the above outcomes between robot-assisted radical cystectomy and ORC or between laparoscopic radical cystectomy and ORC with the exception of the complication rate.

Conclusions

MIRC is an effective and safe surgical approach in the treatment of bladder cancer. However, a large-scale multicenter RCT is needed to confirm these findings.

Comparison of Hospital Readmission After Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty vs Spinal Surgery After Implementation of the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program

IMPORTANCE

The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP) was recently expanded to penalize excessive readmissions after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA). These are the first surgical procedures to be included in the HRRP.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether the HRRP was associated with a greater decrease in readmissions after targeted procedures (THA and TKA) compared with similar nontargeted procedures (lumbar spine fusion and laminectomy).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients 50 years or older among all payers in the Nationwide Readmissions Database who underwent THA, TKA, lumbar spine fusion, or laminectomy between January 1, 2010, and September 30, 2015. Multivariable logistic regression and interrupted time-series models were used to calculate and compare 30-day readmission trends in 3 periods associated with the HRRP: preimplementation (January 2010-September 2012), implementation (October 2012-September 2014), and penalty (October 2014-September 2015). Statistical analysis was performed from January 1, 2010, to September 30, 2015.

EXPOSURES

Announcement and implementation of the HRRP.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Readmission within 30 days after hospitalization for THA, TKA, lumbar spine fusion, or laminectomy surgery.

RESULTS

The study included 6 687 077 (58.3% women and 41.7% men; mean age, 66.7 years; 95% CI, 66.7-66.8 years) weighted hospitalizations for THA, TKA, lumbar spine fusion, and laminectomy surgery: 4 765 466 hospitalizations for targeted conditions and 1 921 611 for nontargeted conditions. After passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, the risk-adjusted rates of readmission after all procedures decreased in a similar fashion. Implementation of the HRRP was associated with a 0.018% per month decrease in the rate of readmission (95% CI, -0.025% to -0.010%) after targeted procedures, which was not observed after nontargeted procedures (slope per month, -0.003%; 95% CI, -0.016% to 0.010%). Penalties were not associated with a greater decrease in readmission for either targeted or nontargeted procedures.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These results appear to be consistent with hospitals responding to the future possibility of penalties by reducing readmissions after surgical procedures targeted by the HRRP.