1
|
Jadvar H, Abreu AL, Ballas LK, Quinn DI. Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Challenges. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1628-1635. [PMID: 36319116 PMCID: PMC9635685 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 07/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
In accordance with the spectrum theory of metastatic disease, an oligometastatic clinical state has been proposed as an intermediary step along the natural history of cancer with few (typically 1-3) metastatic lesions identifiable on imaging that may be amenable to metastasis-directed therapy. Effective therapy of oligometastatic disease is anticipated to impact cancer evolution by delaying progression and improving patient outcome at a minimal or acceptable cost of toxicity. There has been increasing recognition of oligometastatic disease in prostate cancer with the advent of new-generation imaging agents, most notably the recently approved PET radiotracers based on targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen. Early clinical trials with metastasis-directed therapy of oligometastases have provided evidence for delaying the employment of systematic therapy and improving outcome in selected patients. Despite these encouraging results, much needs to be investigated and learned about the underlying biology of the oligometastatic state along the evolutionary clinical course of prostate cancer, the identification of relevant imaging and nonimaging predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and the development of treatment strategies to optimize short-term and long-term patient outcome. We provide a review of the current status and the lingering challenges of this rapidly evolving clinical space in prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Jadvar
- Department of Radiology, Kenneth J. Norris, Jr., Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andre Luis Abreu
- Institute of Urology, Kenneth J. Norris, Jr., Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Leslie K. Ballas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kenneth J. Norris, Jr., Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California; and
| | - David I. Quinn
- Division of Cancer Medicine, Department of Medicine, Kenneth J. Norris, Jr., Comprehensive Cancer Center, USC Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cellini F, Tagliaferri L, Frascino V, Alitto AR, Fionda B, Boldrini L, Romano A, Casà C, Catucci F, Mattiucci GC, Valentini V. Radiation therapy for prostate cancer: What's the best in 2021. Urologia 2022; 89:5-15. [PMID: 34496707 DOI: 10.1177/03915603211042335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Radiotherapy is highly involved in the management of prostate cancer. Its features and potential applications experienced a radical evolution over last decades, as they are associated to the continuous evolution of available technology and current oncological innovations. Some application of radiotherapy like brachytherapy have been recently enriched by innovative features and multidisciplinary dedications. In this report we aim to put some questions regarding the following issues regarding multiple aspects of modern application of radiation oncology: the current application of radiation oncology; the modern role of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for both the management of primary lesions and for lymph-nodal recurrence; the management of the oligometastatic presentations; the role of brachytherapy; the aid played by the application of the organ at risk spacer (spacer OAR), fiducial markers, electromagnetic tracking systems and on-line Magnetic Resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT), and the role of the new opportunity represented by radiomic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Frascino
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Rita Alitto
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Fionda
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Boldrini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Angela Romano
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Calogero Casà
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Gian Carlo Mattiucci
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
- Radiation Oncology, Mater Olbia Hospital, Olbia, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nicholls L, Chapman E, Khoo V, Suh YE, Tunariu N, Wang Y, van As N. Metastasis-directed Therapy in Prostate Cancer: Prognostic Significance of the ESTRO/EORTC Classification in Oligometastatic Bone Disease. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 34:63-69. [PMID: 34756755 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 09/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Oligometastatic disease (OMD) represents a spectrum of clinical scenarios and various classification systems have been proposed. Bone-only OMD can occur in patients with advanced prostate cancer and validated decision-making tools are needed to assist patient selection for metastasis-directed therapy. The aim of the present study was to determine the prognostic utility of a classification system for OMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective review was conducted of all patients with bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) since November 2011. SBRT was delivered using CyberKnife® and gantry-based linear accelerator platforms. All patients were classified into oligometastatic states based on the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (ESTRO/EORTC) classification system. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were carried out to determine the prognostic utility of this classification system. RESULTS In total, 105 patients with 145 osseous metastases were treated over 119 sessions. The median follow-up after SBRT was 23 months (interquartile range 10-39.8). Twelve patients had died after a median time of 31 months. The 3-year metastatic progression-free survival was 23% (95% confidence interval 13-32) and the 3-year overall survival was 88% (95% confidence interval 80-96). Patients in a metachronous oligometastatic state were 4.50 (95% confidence interval 1.19-17.10, P = 0.03) times more likely to experience metastatic progression compared with those with synchronous oligometastases, and 6.69 (95% confidence interval 1.05-42.50, P = 0.04) times more likely to experience any failure. Hazard ratio magnitudes increased for patients in a repeat oligometastatic state. The multivariate model for both metastatic progression-free survival and failure-free survival found prostate-specific antigen doubling time <4 months (P = 0.002; P = 0.05) to independently predict for progression. CONCLUSION The ESTRO/EORTC classification of OMD predicts for progression in patients treated with SBRT for bone-only oligometastatic prostate cancer at our institution. Further validation in prospective series over multiple tumour sites is needed. These characterisation factors should be assessed in patients considered for metastasis-directed therapy together with established prognostic features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Nicholls
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - E Chapman
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - V Khoo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - Y-E Suh
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - N Tunariu
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| | - Y Wang
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - N van As
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Institute of Cancer Research, Chelsea, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Defining oligometastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer and clinically significant outcomes: Implications on clinical trials? Urol Oncol 2021; 39:431.e1-431.e8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
5
|
Meem M, Zukotynski K, Raman S, Emmenegger U. Bone scan use in the management of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Survey of practice patterns among Canadian radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, and urologists. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 14:E601-E603. [PMID: 32520699 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The use of skeletal scintigraphy with technetium-99 methylene diphosphonate (hereafter referred to as a bone scan) for evaluating response to systemic treatment in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is an evolving paradigm in this era of advancing therapies and imaging techniques. Indeed, the interpretation of bone scans can be challenging, and there is a growing expectation that advanced imaging techniques such as prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computer tomography (PSMA PET/CT) may play a complementary role.1 The Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) has outlined specific criteria to define disease progression with respect to bone scans performed as part of clinical trials.2 However, there is no high-level evidence for the scheduling and interpretation of bone scans during routine therapeutic interventions for mCRPC. Thus, patterns of bone scan use are variable and practice-dependent outside of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbuba Meem
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katherine Zukotynski
- Departments of Medicine and Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Urban Emmenegger
- Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre and Research Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Clinical perspectives from ongoing trials in oligometastatic or oligorecurrent prostate cancer: an analysis of clinical trials registries. World J Urol 2020; 39:317-326. [PMID: 31955223 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03063-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2019] [Accepted: 12/17/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Thanks to the introduction of more sensitive/specific imaging and minimally invasive treatment techniques, the oligometastatic state in prostate cancer (PCa) has attracted the interest of the uro-oncological community. We aim to identify and analyze trials across five registries to gain insights into the directions this field is moving. METHODS A systematic review of trials on oligometastatic PCa registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, ANZCTR, ISRCTN, Netherlands and UMIN Clinical Trials Registries was performed using the following keywords: 'prostate cancer' and 'oligo'. Data were extracted from ongoing/completed trials, with an unreported primary endpoint in a peer-reviewed journal, as of May until August, 2018. RESULTS We identified 41 trials on oligometastatic PCa. Twenty-four trials are conducted in North America and 14 in Europe. Up to 70% are phase I or II trials and < 10% (n = 4) are in phase III. Less than 50% (n = 17) are randomized controlled trials. Oligometastases are PET detected in 25 trials. Studies on synchronous oligometastatic (n = 12; 29%) or oligorecurrent (n = 14; 34%) PCa are equally represented, the remainder focus on mixed states (n = 15; 37%). The majority (n = 39; 95%) of trials investigate local treatment options (RP: 5; RT: 9; RP ± RT: 7; metastasis-directed therapy: 28) with (72%) or without (28%) systemic treatment. The remaining two are imaging studies. Progression-free (PFS; 17/41; 41%) or overall survival (OS; 3/41; 7%) is defined as primary endpoint in half of all trials, others are 'safety/toxicity' or 'PSA response'. CONCLUSIONS With 41 ongoing trials, there is great interest in oligometastatic PCa. Most trials address local ablative treatments both for prostate and/or metastases, typically by radiotherapy, and several attempts to determine the benefit of adding systemic therapy. The field will hopefully have definitive answers after completion of four ongoing phase III trials.
Collapse
|
7
|
Stelcer E, Konkol M, Głȩboka A, Suchorska WM. Liquid Biopsy in Oligometastatic Prostate Cancer-A Biologist's Point of View. Front Oncol 2019; 9:775. [PMID: 31475117 PMCID: PMC6702517 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the main cause of cancer-related mortality in males and the diagnosis, treatment, and care of these patients places a great burden on healthcare systems globally. Clinically, PCa is highly heterogeneous, ranging from indolent tumors to highly aggressive disease. In many cases treatment-generally either radiotherapy (RT) or surgery-can be curative. Several key genetic and demographic factors such as age, family history, genetic susceptibility, and race are associated with a high incidence of PCa. While our understanding of PCa, which is mainly based on the tools of molecular biology-has improved dramatically in recent years, efforts to better understand this complex disease have led to the identification of a new type of PCa-oligometastatic PCa. Oligometastatic disease should be considered an individual, heterogeneous entity with distinct metastatic phenotypes and, consequently, wide prognostic variability. In general, patients with oligometastatic disease typically present less biologically aggressive tumors whose metastatic potential is more limited and which are slow-growing. These patients are good candidates for more aggressive treatment approaches. The main aim of the presented review was to evaluate the utility of liquid biopsy for diagnostic purposes in PCa and for use in monitoring disease progression and treatment response, particularly in patients with oligometastatic PCa. Liquid biopsies offer a rapid, non-invasive approach whose use t is expected to play an important role in routine clinical practice to benefit patients. However, more research is needed to resolve the many existing discrepancies with regard to the definition and isolation method for specific biomarkers, as well as the need to determine the most appropriate markers. Consequently, the current priority in this field is to standardize liquid biopsy-based techniques. This review will help to improve understanding of the biology of PCa, particularly the recently defined condition known as "oligometastatic PCa". The presented review of the body of evidence suggests that additional research in molecular biology may help to establish novel treatments for oligometastatic PCa. In the near future, the treatment of PCa will require an interdisciplinary approach involving active cooperation among clinicians, physicians, and biologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ewelina Stelcer
- Radiobiology Laboratory, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Marek Konkol
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
- Radiation Oncology Department, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
| | | | - Wiktoria Maria Suchorska
- Radiobiology Laboratory, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gomez-Iturriaga A, Casquero Ocio F, Ost P, Fernandez I, Rodeño E, Llarena R, Garcia-Olaverri J, Ortiz de Zarate R, Cacicedo J, Ahtamon A, Bilbao P. Outcomes after a first and/or second salvage treatment in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence detected by (18-F) choline PET-CT. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 28:e13093. [PMID: 31115124 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Revised: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The primary objective of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in patients with oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence after single or repeated salvage radiation treatment. METHODS Forty-nine consecutive prostate cancer patients diagnosed with oligometastatic recurrence on Ch-PET have been prospectively treated. Seven (23%) patients had castrate-resistant disease. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Potential prognostic factors were examined using univariate proportional hazards regression. RESULTS The treatments administered to the initial oligorecurrence sites were intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) ± ADT (26 patients; 53%) and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) ± ADT (23 patients; 47%). With a median follow-up of 24 months (range 6-39), 24 patients developed a biochemical failure. Twenty out of the 24 relapsed patients underwent a second Ch-PET/CT. Seven patients presented poly-metastatic relapse and 10 oligometastatic diseases. Six of 10 patients with a second oligorecurrence were treated again with SABR. Overall, 102 lesions were treated. Local control was detected in 45 (91.8%) patients. No relevant (grade ≥ 2) toxicity was reported, and there was no grade 3 toxicity. On univariate analysis, none of the variables were significantly predicted for clinical disease-free survival. At last follow-up visit, 24 patients (40%) were free from biochemical failure and 37 (71%) patients were free from clinical disease. The 2-year OS and PCSS were 91.8% and 95.9% respectively. CONCLUSION Salvage IMRT or SBRT of oligometastatic prostate cancer recurrence is associated with a prolonged cDFS. This may result in a longer time to develop castrate-resistant disease and a longer time without systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfonso Gomez-Iturriaga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Francisco Casquero Ocio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Iratxe Fernandez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Emilia Rodeño
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Roberto Llarena
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Jorge Garcia-Olaverri
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Roberto Ortiz de Zarate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Jon Cacicedo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Alina Ahtamon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Pedro Bilbao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Cruces, Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Effective and well tolerated: where do these drugs fit now? Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:469-470. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30901-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
10
|
Beuthien-Baumann B, Koerber SA. PET imaging in adaptive radiotherapy of prostate tumors. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL CHEMISTRY AND BIOLOGY 2018; 62:404-410. [DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.18.03080-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
11
|
Timon G, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Fersino S, Iotti C, Corvò R, Magrini SM, Alongi F. Non-palliative radiotherapy in ab initio oligometastatic prostate cancer: an Italian national survey. Radiol Med 2018; 124:211-217. [DOI: 10.1007/s11547-018-0952-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
12
|
Abdel-Rahman O, Cheung WY. Impact of Prior Local Treatment on the Outcomes of Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2018; 16:466-472. [PMID: 30098982 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 07/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local treatment of metastatic prostate cancer and its impact on future disease course requires further assessment. We sought to evaluate the impact of prior local treatment to the prostate on the outcomes of hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (HSPC) patients recruited in the CHAARTED study. PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective analysis of the prospectively collected data among patients with metastatic HSPC in the CHAARTED study, a phase 3 multicenter study conducted between 2006 and 2014. The CHAARTED study compared androgen deprivation therapy plus docetaxel versus androgen deprivation therapy alone among patients with metastatic HSPC. The main outcomes of the current analysis are overall survival, progression-free survival, prostate cancer-specific survival, and time to castration-resistant disease as assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank testing, and Cox regression models. RESULTS Kaplan-Meier overall survival estimates were produced according to whether patients underwent prior local treatment and results were stratified by treatment arm. For both treatment arms, patients with prior local treatment had better overall survival (P < .01). Similarly, Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival estimates were produced according to whether patients underwent prior local treatment, and results were stratified by the treatment arm. For both treatment arms, patients with prior local treatment had better progression-free survival (P < .01). In an adjusted Cox multivariate model (adjusted for assigned study treatment arm, age, baseline prostate-specific antigen, and baseline Gleason score, volume of the disease (low risk or high risk) and baseline performance status), patients with prior local treatment had better overall survival (P = .045), progression-free survival (P = .035), and cancer-specific survival (P = .010) compared to those without prior local treatment. Moreover, they had a longer time to development of castration-resistant disease (P = .025). CONCLUSION Patients with metastatic HSPC and prior local treatment had better overall, progression-free, and cancer-specific survivals compared to those without prior local treatment. The impact of these findings on the treatment paradigms for metastatic HSPC should be thoroughly evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Abdel-Rahman
- Clinical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt; Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Winson Y Cheung
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and PSA <0.5 ng/ml. Efficacy and impact on treatment strategy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 46:11-19. [DOI: 10.1007/s00259-018-4066-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2018] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
14
|
Nieder C, Haukland E, Pawinski A, Norum J. Seven-month prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is prognostic in patients with prostate cancer initially diagnosed with distant metastases. Med Oncol 2018; 35:46. [PMID: 29508104 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1110-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2018] [Accepted: 02/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Recent research suggests that prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 0.2 ng/dl at 7 months is prognostic for better survival with androgen deprivation therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer regardless of chemotherapy with docetaxel. These results were derived from a group of clinical trial participants. Therefore, we performed a confirmatory analysis in patients treated outside of trials. Furthermore, we limited inclusion to those who presented with metastases at the initial diagnosis of prostate cancer (synchronous metastases). A retrospective analysis of a comprehensive regional database was performed. The oncology care in this region (Nordland County, Northern Norway) was provided by one center. Patients who were diagnosed between January 01, 2004 and December 31, 2016 were included. Of 101 patients, 90 were alive at 7 months and had their PSA value measured. Their median age was 68.5 years. Only six patients (7%) achieved PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/dl at 7 months. The median value was 4.05 ng/dl. Median overall survival was shortest in patients with PSA > 4.0 ng/dl (22 months). For patients with PSA between 0.3 and 4.0 ng/dl, median survival was 54 months (p = 0.0001). No further increase was seen in the small group with lower PSA. Statistical significance was also found for a cutoff of ≤ 1.0 ng/dl (55 vs. 32 months). PSA at 7 months predicts overall survival. Given that only 7% of patients achieved PSA ≤ 0.2 ng/dl, confirmation of this particular cutoff requires additional studies in other populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Nieder
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsö, Norway. .,Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, 8092, Bodø, Norway.
| | - Ellinor Haukland
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsö, Norway.,Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, 8092, Bodø, Norway
| | - Adam Pawinski
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, 8092, Bodø, Norway
| | - Jan Norum
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsö, Norway.,Department of Surgery, Finnmark Hospital Trust, Hammerfest, 9600, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Denis-Bacelar AM, Chittenden SJ, Dearnaley DP, Divoli A, O'Sullivan JM, McCready VR, Johnson B, Du Y, Flux GD. Reply to 'Single high dose versus repeated bone-targeted radionuclide therapy'. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2018; 45:515-517. [PMID: 29247283 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-017-3902-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M Denis-Bacelar
- Chemical, Medical and Environmental Science Department, National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington, TW11 0LW, UK.
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5NG, UK.
| | - Sarah J Chittenden
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - David P Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Antigoni Divoli
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Joe M O'Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
| | - V Ralph McCready
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, BN2 5BE, UK
| | - Bernadette Johnson
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| | - Yong Du
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5PT, UK
| | - Glenn D Flux
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, SM2 5NG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Denis-Bacelar AM, Chittenden SJ, Murray I, Divoli A, Ralph McCready V, Dearnaley DP, O’Sullivan JM, Johnson B, Flux GD. A radiobiological model of metastatic burden reduction for molecular radiotherapy: application to patients with bone metastases. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:2859-2870. [PMID: 28291739 PMCID: PMC5953197 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5e6f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Revised: 01/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Skeletal tumour burden is a biomarker of prognosis and survival in cancer patients. This study proposes a novel method based on the linear quadratic model to predict the reduction in metastatic tumour burden as a function of the absorbed doses delivered from molecular radiotherapy treatments. The range of absorbed doses necessary to eradicate all the bone lesions and to reduce the metastatic burden was investigated in a cohort of 22 patients with bone metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer. A metastatic burden reduction curve was generated for each patient, which predicts the reduction in metastatic burden as a function of the patient mean absorbed dose, defined as the mean of all the lesion absorbed doses in any given patient. In the patient cohort studied, the median of the patient mean absorbed dose predicted to reduce the metastatic burden by 50% was 89 Gy (interquartile range: 83-105 Gy), whilst a median of 183 Gy (interquartile range: 107-247 Gy) was found necessary to eradicate all metastases in a given patient. The absorbed dose required to eradicate all the lesions was strongly correlated with the variability of the absorbed doses delivered to multiple lesions in a given patient (r = 0.98, P < 0.0001). The metastatic burden reduction curves showed a potential large reduction in metastatic burden for a small increase in absorbed dose in 91% of patients. The results indicate the range of absorbed doses required to potentially obtain a significant survival benefit. The metastatic burden reduction method provides a simple tool that could be used in routine clinical practice for patient selection and to indicate the required administered activity to achieve a predicted patient mean absorbed dose and reduction in metastatic tumour burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana M Denis-Bacelar
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah J Chittenden
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Iain Murray
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Antigoni Divoli
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - V Ralph McCready
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - David P Dearnaley
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joe M O’Sullivan
- Centre for Cancer Research and Cell Biology, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Bernadette Johnson
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Glenn D Flux
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
[Surgery for metastatic prostate cancer]. Urologe A 2017; 56:1017-1018. [PMID: 28349186 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-017-0373-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
18
|
Jereczek-Fossa BA, Fanetti G, Fodor C, Ciardo D, Santoro L, Francia CM, Muto M, Surgo A, Zerini D, Marvaso G, Timon G, Romanelli P, Rondi E, Comi S, Cattani F, Golino F, Mazza S, Matei DV, Ferro M, Musi G, Nolè F, de Cobelli O, Ost P, Orecchia R. Salvage Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Isolated Lymph Node Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Single Institution Series of 94 Consecutive Patients and 124 Lymph Nodes. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2017; 15:e623-e632. [PMID: 28185875 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2017.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Revised: 12/23/2016] [Accepted: 01/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of the study was to evaluate the prostate serum antigen (PSA) response, local control, progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lymph node (LN) oligorecurrent prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between May 2012 and October 2015, 124 lesions were treated in 94 patients with a median dose of 24 Gy in 3 fractions. Seventy patients were treated for a single lesion and 25 for > 1 lesion. In 34 patients androgen deprivation (AD) was combined with SBRT. We evaluated biochemical response according to PSA level every 3 months after SBRT: a 3-month PSA decrease from pre-SBRT PSA of more than 10% identified responder patients. In case of PSA level increase, imaging was performed to evaluate clinical progression. Toxicity was assessed every 6 to 9 months after SBRT. RESULTS Median follow-up was 18.5 months. In 13 patients (14%) Grade 1 to 2 toxicity was reported without any Grade 3 to 4 toxicity. Biochemical response, stabilization, and progression were observed in 64 (68%), 10 (11%), and 20 (21%) of 94 evaluable patients. Clinical progression was observed in 31 patients (33%) after a median time of 8.1 months. In-field progression occurred in 12 lesions (9.7%). Two-year local control and PFS rates were 84% and 30%, respectively. Age older than 75 years correlated with better biochemical response rate. Age older than 75 years, concomitant AD administered up to 12 months, and pelvic LN involvement correlated with longer PFS. CONCLUSION SBRT is safe and offers good in-field control. At 2 years after SBRT, 1 of 3 patients is progression-free. Further investigation is warranted to identify patients who benefit most from SBRT and to define the optimal combination with AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Delia Ciardo
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Santoro
- Department of Epidemiology and Statistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Maria Francia
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Muto
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Surgo
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Dario Zerini
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Marvaso
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Timon
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Romanelli
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Rondi
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Golino
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Mazza
- Department of Radiotherapy, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Matteo Ferro
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Gennaro Musi
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Nolè
- Division of Urogenital and Head and Neck Tumours, Department of Medical Oncology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Piet Ost
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Scientific Directorate, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|