Preoperative nomogram predicting 12-year probability of metastatic renal cancer - evaluation in a contemporary cohort

A Review of Neoadjuvant Therapy for Localized and Locally Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

The introduction of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinases (VEGFR-TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (IOs) have drastically altered the treatment landscape for kidney cancer, with doublet combination immunotherapy (IO/IO or IO/VEGFR-TKI) now set as the standard front-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the roles of VEGFR-TKIs and IOs in the neoadjuvant setting for locoregional/locally advanced RCC remain undefined, where the goals may be primary tumor downsizing/downstaging and potentially eradicating micrometastatic disease. This review will examine VEGFR-TKI monotherapy, IO monotherapy, and VEGFR-TKI/IO combination regimens in a preoperative setting with a focus on the efficacy, toxicity, surgical, and long-term implications.

Renal cell cancer treatment: the Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group (LACOG) and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group (LARCG) surgery-focused consensus update

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) represents 2.2% of all malignancies worldwide; however, its mortality rate is not negligible. Surgery is the primary treatment for most nonadvanced cases, with its indications and techniques evolving over the years. To provide an update on RCC management in Brazil, focusing on surgery. The Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group-Genitourinary Section and the Latin American Renal Cancer Group gathered a panel of Brazilian urologists and clinical oncologists to vote on and discuss the best management of surgically resectable RCC. The experts compared the results with the literature and graded them according to the level of evidence. For small renal masses (SRMs; less than 4 cm), biopsy is indicated for specific/select cases, and when intervention is needed, partial nephrectomy should be prioritized. Radical nephrectomy and ablative techniques are exceptions for managing SRMs. Patients with small tumors (less than 3 cm), slow tumor growth, or a risk for surgery may benefit from active surveillance. Localized carcinoma up to 7 cm in diameter should be treated preferably with partial nephrectomy. Lymphadenectomy and adrenalectomy should be performed in locally advanced cases if involvement is suspected by imaging exams. Patients with venous tumor thrombi usually require surgical intervention depending on the extent of the thrombus. Neoadjuvant therapy should be considered for unresectable cases. Even in the era of targeted therapy, cytoreductive nephrectomy still has a role in metastatic disease. Metastasectomy is indicated for most patients with resectable disease. This consensus presents recommendations for surgical treatment of RCC based on expert opinions and evidence from the medical literature. Surgery remains the best curative option for nonadvanced cases, and it still has a role for select patients with metastatic disease.

Development and validation of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion weighted imaging-based model for preoperative distinguishing nuclear grade and survival of clear cell renal cell carcinoma complicated with venous tumor thrombus

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of multiparametric MRI and clinical indicators in distinguishing nuclear grade and survival of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) complicated with venous tumor thrombus (VTT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 105 and 27 patients in the training and test sets, respectively. Preoperative MRI, including intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI), was performed. Renal lesions were evaluated for IVIM-DWI metrics and conventional MRI features. All the patients had postoperative histologically proven ccRCC and VTT. An expert uropathologist reviewed all specimens to confirm the nuclear grade of the World Health Organization/ International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) of the tumor. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to select the preoperative imaging features and clinical indicators. The predictive ability of the logistic regression model was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Survival curves were plotted using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

High WHO/ISUP nuclear grade was confirmed in 69 of 105 patients (65.7%) in the training set and 19 of 27 patients (70.4%) in the test set, respectively (P = 0.647). Dp_ROI_Low, tumor size, serum albumin, platelet count, and lymphocyte count were independently related to high WHO/ISUP nuclear grade in the training set. The model identified high WHO/ISUP nuclear grade well, with an AUC of 0.817 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.735-0.899), a sensitivity of 70.0%, and a specificity of 77.8% in the training set. In the independent test set, the model demonstrated an AUC of 0.766 (95% CI, 0.567-0.966), a sensitivity of 79.0%, and a specificity of 75.0%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the predicted high WHO/ISUP nuclear grade group had poorer progression-free survival than the low WHO/ISUP nuclear grade group in both the training and test sets (P = 0.001 and P = 0.021).

CONCLUSIONS

IVIM-DWI-derived parameters and clinical indicators can be used to differentiate nuclear grades and predict progression-free survival of ccRCC and VTT.

Plasma Kidney Injury Molecule-1 for Preoperative Prediction of Renal Cell Carcinoma Versus Benign Renal Masses, and Association With Clinical Outcomes

PURPOSE

Both clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) overexpress kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1). We investigated whether plasma KIM-1 (pKIM-1) may be a useful risk stratification tool among patients with suspicious renal masses.

METHODS

Prenephrectomy pKIM-1 was measured in two independent cohorts of patients with renal masses. Cohort 1, from the prospective K2 trial, included 162 patients found to have clear cell RCC (cases) and 162 patients with benign renal masses (controls). Cohort 2 included 247 patients with small (cT1a) renal masses from an academic biorepository, of whom 184 had RCC. We assessed the relationship between pKIM-1, surgical pathology, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

In Cohort 1, pKIM-1 distinguished RCC versus benign masses with area under the receiver operating curve (AUC-ROC, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.76 to 0.86]). In Cohort 2 (cT1a only), pKIM-1 distinguished RCC versus benign masses (AUC-ROC, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.80]) and the addition of pKIM-1 to an established nomogram for predicting malignancy improved the model AUC-ROC (0.65 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.74] v 0.78 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.85]). A pKIM-1 cutpoint identified using Cohort 2 demonstrated sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 60% for identifying RCC in Cohort 1. In long-term follow-up of RCC cases (Cohort 1), higher prenephrectomy pKIM-1 was associated with worse metastasis-free survival (multivariable MFS hazard ratio [HR] 1.29 per unit increase in log pKIM-1, 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.53) and overall survival (multivariable OS HR 1.31 per unit increase in log pKIM-1, 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.54). In long-term follow-up of Cohort 2, no metastatic events occurred, consistent with the favorable prognosis of resected cT1a RCC.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with renal masses, pKIM-1 is associated with malignant pathology, worse MFS, and risk of death. pKIM-1 may be useful for selecting patients with renal masses for intervention versus surveillance.

Renal cell carcinoma and venous tumor thrombus: predicting sarcomatoid dedifferentiation through preoperative IVIM-based MR imaging

PURPOSE

To evaluate the value of preoperative intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging (IVIM-DWI) and conventional MRI indicators in identifying sarcomatoid dedifferentiation in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and tumor thrombus.

METHODS

From September 2016 to April 2023, consecutive patients with RCC and tumor thrombus who received routine MRI examination and IVIM-DWI before radical resection were enrolled prospectively. Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test was used to calculate and compare the survival probability. The preoperative imaging features were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify independent predictors of sarcomatoid dedifferentiation. The predictive ability was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients (15.3%) of the 144 patients in the training set (median age, 58.0 years [IQR, 52.0-65.0 years]; 108 men) and 11 patients (22.4%) of the 49 patients in the test set (median age, 58.0 years [IQR, 53.0-63.0 years]; 38 men) had sarcomatoid dedifferentiated tumors. Patients with sarcomatoid-differentiated tumors had poor progress-free survival in the training set and test set (P < 0.001 and P = 0.007). f value (P = 0.011), mN stage (P = 0.007), and necrosis (P = 0.041) were independent predictors for predicting sarcomatoid dedifferentiation in the training set. The model combining conventional MRI features and f value had AUCs of 0.832 (95% CI 0.755-0.909) and 0.825 (95% CI 0.702-0.948) in predicting sarcomatoid dedifferentiation in the training set and test set.

CONCLUSION

It is feasible to preoperatively identify sarcomatoid dedifferentiation based on IVIM-DWI and conventional MR imaging indicators.

Role of perioperative immunotherapy in localized renal cell carcinoma

Immunotherapy has proven effective in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The current standard of treatment in localized RCC is partial or complete nephrectomy. However, after surgery, there is a high recurrence rate and survival rates ranging from 53% to 85% depending on the stage of disease at presentation. Given clinical response to immunotherapies in metastatic RCC, these therapies are being tested as monotherapy and in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in the (neo)adjuvant setting. Here we describe the current landscape of these treatments in localized RCC.

Comprehensive assessments of immuno-oncology drug-based combination therapies as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma

Over the last decade, there have been substantial progress in the field of systemic therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma. Through the transition from treatment with cytokines to molecular-targeted agents, and currently to immuno-oncology drugs, the prognostic outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma have been markedly improved. In particular, based on the promising outcomes of recently conducted pivotal randomized clinical trials, immuno-oncology drug-based combination therapy by either dual immune checkpoint inhibition or combined inhibition of an immune checkpoint and tyrosine kinase, is currently regarded as a standard of care for treatment-naïve advanced renal cell carcinoma patients. However, insufficient data are available with respect to the selection of optimal systemic therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma in the first-line setting due to the lack of a head-to-head comparison between approved immuno-oncology drug-based combination therapies. In this review, therefore, we summarize interesting findings associated with first-line combination therapies for advanced renal cell carcinoma obtained from both randomized clinical trials and real-world clinical practices, in order to present useful guidance to help make treatment decisions for patients with treatment-naïve advanced renal cell carcinoma.