1
|
Clari M, Albanesi B, Comoretto RI, Conti A, Renzi E, Luciani M, Ausili D, Massimi A, Dimonte V. Effectiveness of interventions to increase healthcare workers' adherence to vaccination against vaccine-preventable diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 1993 to 2022. Euro Surveill 2024; 29:2300276. [PMID: 38426238 PMCID: PMC10986662 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2024.29.9.2300276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BackgroundVaccination adherence among healthcare workers (HCWs) is fundamental for the prevention of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) in healthcare. This safeguards HCWs' well-being, prevents transmission of infections to vulnerable patients and contributes to public health.AimThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to describe interventions meant to increase HCWs' adherence to vaccination and estimate the effectiveness of these interventions.MethodsWe searched literature in eight databases and performed manual searches in relevant journals and the reference lists of retrieved articles. The study population included any HCW with potential occupational exposure to VPDs. We included experimental and quasi-experimental studies presenting interventions aimed at increasing HCWs' adherence to vaccination against VPDs. The post-intervention vaccination adherence rate was set as the main outcome. We included the effect of interventions in the random-effects and subgroup meta-analyses.ResultsThe systematic review considered 48 studies on influenza and Tdap vaccination from database and manual searches, and 43 were meta-analysed. A statistically significant, positive effect was seen in multi-component interventions in randomised controlled trials (relative risk (RR) = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.13-1.66) and in observational studies (RR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.29-1.58). Vaccination adherence rate was higher in community care facilities (RR = 1.58; 95% CI: 1.49-1.68) than in hospitals (RR = 1.24; 95% CI: 0.76-2.05).ConclusionInterventions aimed at increasing HCWs' adherence to vaccination against VPDs are effective, especially multi-component ones. Future research should determine the most effective framework of interventions for each setting, using appropriate study design for their evaluation, and should compare intervention components to understand their contribution to the effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Clari
- Department of Sciences of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- These authors contributed equally to this work and shared first authorship
| | - Beatrice Albanesi
- Department of Sciences of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- These authors contributed equally to this work and shared first authorship
| | | | - Alessio Conti
- Department of Sciences of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Erika Renzi
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Luciani
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan Italy
| | - Davide Ausili
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano - Bicocca, Milan Italy
| | - Azzurra Massimi
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Dimonte
- Department of Sciences of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kalunga L, Bulut E, Chen Z, Li Y, Ivanek R. Increasing vaccine uptake among employees within the non-health related critical infrastructure sectors: A review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2023; 19:2135852. [PMID: 36628470 PMCID: PMC9980543 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2022.2135852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
This review aimed to identify barriers to employee vaccination, motivators for vaccination, and vaccine uptake strategies within the critical infrastructure sectors. We focused on non-healthcare-related sectors, including food and agriculture, manufacturing, and education where employee vaccination is rarely mandated. We conducted a search for literature published from 2012 to 2022 from MEDLINE-PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science Core Collection, which resulted in 22 studies that met the inclusion criteria. We found that 1) barriers to vaccination differ by infectious disease and population; 2) common motivators for vaccination were about protecting self, family, and community; and 3) common uptake strategies for influenza (which accounted for 83% of uptake strategies in reviewed studies) addressed convenience and confidence barriers such as vaccination cost and education. Our review highlights the need for employers, policymakers, and researchers to identify infectious disease and population-specific barriers to vaccination and implement strategies aimed at addressing the identified barriers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Kalunga
- Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA,CONTACT Linda Kalunga Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA
| | - Ece Bulut
- Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Ziqian Chen
- College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Yihong Li
- Department of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Renata Ivanek
- Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alsaif F, Twigg M, Scott S, Blyth A, Wright D, Patel A. A systematic review of barriers and enablers associated with uptake of influenza vaccine among care home staff. Vaccine 2023; 41:6156-6173. [PMID: 37673716 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.08.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
Barriers and enablers to vaccination of care home (CH) staff should be identified in order to develop interventions to address them that increase uptake and protect residents. We aimed to synthesis the evidence describing the barriers and enablers that affect the influenza vaccination uptake of care home (CH) staff. METHOD We searched PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, AMED, IBSS, SCOPUS to identify quantitative, qualitative or mixed-method studies. Data related to health or social care workers in CHs reported barriers or enablers were extracted and mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF); the data within each domain were grouped and categorized into key factors affecting influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff. RESULTS We screened 4025 studies; 42 studies met our inclusion criteria. Thirty-four (81 %) were surveys. Five theoretical domains were frequently reported as mediators of influenza vaccine uptake: Beliefs about consequences (32 studies), Environmental context and resources (30 studies), Emotions (26 studies), Social influences (25 studies), Knowledge (22 studies). The low acceptance rate of the influenza vaccine among CH staff can be attributed to multiple factors, including insufficient understanding of the vaccine, its efficacy, or misconceptions about the vaccine (knowledge), perceiving the vaccine as ineffective and unsafe (beliefs about consequences), fear of influenza vaccine and its side effects (emotions), and experiencing limited accessibility to the vaccine (environmental context and resources). CONCLUSION Interventions aimed at increasing influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff should focus on addressing the barriers identified in this review. These interventions should include components such as enhancing knowledge by providing accurate information about vaccine benefits and safety, addressing negative beliefs by challenging misconceptions, managing concerns and fears through open communication, and improving accessibility to the vaccine through convenient on-site options. This review provides a foundation for the development of tailored Interventions to improve influenza vaccine uptake among CH staff.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Alsaif
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Michael Twigg
- School of Pharmacy, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - Sion Scott
- School of Healthcare, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Annie Blyth
- School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| | - David Wright
- School of Healthcare, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, UK.
| | - Amrish Patel
- School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Potthoff S, Finch T, Bührmann L, Etzelmüller A, van Genugten CR, Girling M, May CR, Perkins N, Vis C, Rapley T. Towards an Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) for improving health and social care services. Health Expect 2023; 26:1997-2012. [PMID: 37403248 PMCID: PMC10485327 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The implementation science literature acknowledges a need for engagement of key stakeholders when designing, delivering and evaluating implementation work. To date, the literature reports minimal or focused stakeholder engagement, where stakeholders are engaged in either barrier identification and/or barrier prioritisation. This paper begins to answer calls from the literature for the development of tools and guidance to support comprehensive stakeholder engagement in implementation research and practice. The paper describes the systematic development of the Implementation-STakeholder Engagement Model (I-STEM) in the context of an international, large-scale empirical implementation study (ImpleMentAll) aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a tailored implementation toolkit. The I-STEM is a sensitising tool that defines key considerations and activities for undertaking stakeholder engagement activities across an implementation process. METHODS In-depth, semistructured interviews and observations were conducted with implementers who were tailoring implementation strategies to integrate and embed internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT) services in 12 routine mental health care organisations in nine countries in Europe and Australia. The analytical process was informed by principles of first- and third-generation Grounded Theory, including constant comparative method. RESULTS We conducted 55 interviews and observed 19 implementation-related activities (e.g., team meetings and technical support calls). The final outcome of our analysis is expressed in an initial version of the I-STEM, consisting of five interrelated concepts: engagement objectives, stakeholder mapping, engagement approaches, engagement qualities and engagement outcomes. Engagement objectives are goals that implementers plan to achieve by working with stakeholders in the implementation process. Stakeholder mapping involves identifying a range of organisations, groups or people who may be instrumental in achieving the engagement objectives. Engagement approaches define the type of work that is undertaken with stakeholders to achieve the engagement objectives. Engagement qualities define the logistics of the engagement approach. Lastly, every engagement activity may result in a range of engagement outcomes. CONCLUSION The I-STEM represents potential avenues for substantial stakeholder engagement activity across key phases of an implementation process. It provides a conceptual model for the planning, delivery, evaluation and reporting of stakeholder engagement activities. The I-STEM is nonprescriptive and highlights the importance of a flexible, iterative approach to stakeholder engagement. It is developmental and will require application and validation across a range of implementation activities. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION Patient contribution to ImpleMentAll trial was facilitated by GAMIAN-Europe at all stages-from grant development to dissemination. GAMIAN-Europe brings together a wide variety of patient representation organisations (local, regional and national) from almost all European countries. GAMIAN-Europe was involved in pilot testing the ItFits-toolkit and provided their views on the various aspects, including stakeholder engagement. Patients were also represented in the external advisory board providing support and advice on the design, conduct and interpretation of the wider project, including the development of the ItFits-toolkit. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03652883. Retrospectively registered on 29 August 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Potthoff
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community WellbeingNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneUK
| | - Tracy Finch
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and HealthNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Leah Bührmann
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community WellbeingNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneUK
- Clinical, Neuro‐, & Developmental Psychology Faculty of Behavioural and Movement SciencesVU AmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Anne Etzelmüller
- Department Sports and Health SciencesTechnical University of MunichMunichGermany
- HelloBetter, GET.ON Institute für Online Gesundheitstrainings GmbHHamburg/BerlinGermany
| | - Claire R. van Genugten
- Clinical, Neuro‐, & Developmental Psychology Faculty of Behavioural and Movement SciencesVU AmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute—Mental HealthAmsterdamThe Netherlands
| | - Melissa Girling
- Department of Nursing, Midwifery and HealthNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK
| | - Carl R. May
- Department of Health Services Research and PolicyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine & NIHR North Thames ARCLondonUK
| | - Neil Perkins
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community WellbeingNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneUK
| | - Christiaan Vis
- Clinical, Neuro‐, & Developmental Psychology Faculty of Behavioural and Movement SciencesVU AmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Department of Public and Occupational HealthAmsterdam Public Health Research InstituteAmsterdam UMCThe Netherlands
- Section for Research‐Based Innovation, Forhelse Research Centre for Digital Mental Health ServicesDivision of Psychiatry Haukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | - Tim Rapley
- Department of Social Work, Education, and Community WellbeingNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle Upon TyneUK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Intention among Nurses Who Have Been Fully Vaccinated against COVID-19: Evidence from Greece. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11010159. [PMID: 36680004 PMCID: PMC9867012 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11010159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Seasonal influenza continues to be a significant public health issue causing hundreds of thousands of deaths annually. Nurses are a priority risk group for influenza vaccination and a high vaccine uptake rate among them is crucial to protect public health. Thus, the aim of our study was to estimate the levels of influenza vaccine acceptance, as well as its determinants, among nurses for the 2022/2023 season. We conducted a cross-sectional study with a convenience sample in Greece. We collected data via an online survey in September 2022. Most of the nurses in the study possessed a MSc/PhD diploma (56.2%) and had previously been infected by SARS-CoV-2 (70.3%). Among nurses, 57.3% were willing to accept the influenza vaccine, 19% were hesitant, and 23.7% were unwilling. Older age, higher levels of perceived support from significant others, and higher COVID-19-related physical exhaustion were positively related to influenza vaccination intention. In contrast, more side effects because of COVID-19 vaccination and higher levels of exhaustion due to measures taken against COVID-19 were negatively associated with vaccination intention. Since the influenza vaccination acceptance rate among nurses was moderate, policymakers should develop and implement measures tailored specifically to nurses in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic to decrease vaccine hesitancy.
Collapse
|
6
|
Doherty E, Kingsland M, Wiggers J, Wolfenden L, Hall A, McCrabb S, Tremain D, Hollis J, Licata M, Wynne O, Dilworth S, Daly JB, Tully B, Dray J, Bailey KA, Elliott EJ, Hodder RK. The effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving preconception and antenatal preventive care: a systematic review. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:121. [PMID: 36419177 PMCID: PMC9682815 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00368-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing modifiable risk factors are not routinely implemented into preconception and antenatal care. This review assessed the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional provision of preconception and antenatal care addressing tobacco smoking, weight management and alcohol consumption. METHODS A systematic review of randomised and non-randomised studies with a parallel comparison group was conducted. Eligible studies used implementation strategy/ies targeted at health professionals to improve at least one element of preconception and/or antenatal care (smoking: ask, advise, assess, assist, arrange; weight/alcohol: assess, advise, refer) compared to usual practice/control or alternative strategies. Eligible studies were identified via CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Maternity and Infant Care, CINAHL and other sources. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate, with other findings summarised using the direction of effect. The certainty of the pooled evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach. RESULTS Fourteen studies were included in the review. Thirteen were in the antenatal period and 12 tested multiple implementation strategies (median: three). Meta-analyses of RCTs found that implementation strategies compared to usual practice/control probably increase asking (OR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.13, 5.59; 3 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) and advising (OR: 4.32; 95% CI: 3.06, 6.11; 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence) about smoking and assessing weight gain (OR: 57.56; 95% CI: 41.78, 79.29; 2 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), and may increase assessing (OR: 2.55; 95% CI: 0.24, 27.06; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), assisting (OR: 6.34; 95% CI: 1.51, 26.63; 3 studies; low-certainty evidence) and arranging support (OR: 3.55; 95% CI: 0.50, 25.34; 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) for smoking. The true effect of implementation strategies in increasing advice about weight gain (OR: 3.37; 95% CI: 2.34, 4.84; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) and alcohol consumption (OR: 10.36; 95% CI: 2.37, 41.20; 2 non-randomised studies; very low-certainty evidence) is uncertain due to the quality of evidence to date. CONCLUSIONS Review findings provide some evidence to support the effectiveness of implementation strategies in improving health professional delivery of antenatal care addressing smoking and weight management. Rigorous research is needed to build certainty in the evidence for improving alcohol and weight gain advice, and in preconception care. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO-CRD42019131691.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Doherty
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Melanie Kingsland
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia ,National Centre of Implementation Science, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia ,National Centre of Implementation Science, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia
| | - Alix Hall
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Sam McCrabb
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Danika Tremain
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia
| | - Jenna Hollis
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Milly Licata
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Olivia Wynne
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Sophie Dilworth
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Justine B. Daly
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia
| | - Belinda Tully
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia
| | - Julia Dray
- grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
| | - Kylie A. Bailey
- grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Psychological Sciences, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia
| | - Elizabeth J. Elliott
- grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XFaculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006 Australia ,grid.413973.b0000 0000 9690 854XSydney Children’s Hospital Network, Kids’ Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145 Australia
| | - Rebecca K. Hodder
- grid.3006.50000 0004 0438 2042Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia ,grid.266842.c0000 0000 8831 109XSchool of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW Australia ,grid.413648.cPopulation Health Research Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305 Australia ,National Centre of Implementation Science, Wallsend, NSW 2287 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hassan MZ, Shirin T, Rahman M, Alamgir ASM, Jahan N, Al Jubayer Biswas MA, Khan SH, Basher MAK, Islam MA, Hussain K, Islam MN, Rabbany MA, Haque MA, Chakraborty SR, Parvin SR, Rahman M, Chowdhury F. Seasonal influenza vaccine uptake among healthcare workers in tertiary care hospitals, Bangladesh: Study protocol for influenza vaccine supply and awareness intervention. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1819. [PMID: 36153529 PMCID: PMC9509585 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14182-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Healthcare workers (HCWs), such as doctors, nurses, and support staffs involved in direct or indirect patient care, are at increased risk of influenza virus infections due to occupational exposures. Vaccination is the most effective way to prevent influenza. Despite the World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations, Bangladesh lacks a seasonal influenza vaccination policy for HCWs, and thus vaccination rates remain low. The current project aims to investigate the effect of interventions on influenza vaccine awareness and availability of vaccine supply, explore HCWs’ knowledge and perceptions about influenza vaccination, understand the barriers and motivators for influenza vaccine uptake, and understand policymakers' views on the practicality of influenza vaccination among HCWs.
Method
We will conduct the study at four tertiary care teaching hospitals in Bangladesh, using a cluster randomized controlled trial approach, with the hospital as the unit of randomization and intervention. The study population will include all types of HCWs.The four different types of intervention will be randomly allocated and implemented in four study hospitals separately. The four interventions will be: i) ensuring the availability of influenza vaccine supply; ii) developing influenza vaccine awareness; iii) both ensuring influenza vaccine supply and developing influenza vaccine awareness and iv) control arm with no intervention. Both quantitative and qualitative approaches will be applied to assess the intervention effect. We will estimate the Difference in Differences (DID) with 95% CI of the proportion of vaccine uptake between each intervention and control (non-intervention) arm, adjusting for the clustering effect. The qualitative data will be summarised using a framework matrix method.
Discussion
The results of this study will inform the development and implementation of a context-specific strategy to enhance influenza vaccination rates among Bangladeshi HCWs.
Trial registration
Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05521763. Version 2.0 was registered in September 2022, and the first participant enrolled in March 2022. Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|
8
|
Doherty E, Kingsland M, Elliott EJ, Tully B, Wolfenden L, Dunlop A, Symonds I, Attia J, Ward S, Hunter M, Azzopardi C, Rissel C, Gillham K, Tsang TW, Reeves P, Wiggers J. Practice change intervention to improve antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy: a randomised stepped-wedge controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:345. [PMID: 35448996 PMCID: PMC9027411 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04646-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical guideline recommendations for addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy are sub-optimally implemented and limited evidence exists to inform practice improvements. The aim of this study was to estimate the effectiveness of a practice change intervention in improving the provision of antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy in public maternity services. Methods A randomised stepped-wedge controlled trial was undertaken with all public maternity services in three sectors (one urban, two regional/rural) of a single local health district in New South Wales, Australia. All antenatal care providers were subject to a seven-month multi-strategy intervention to support the introduction of a recommended model of care. For 35 months (July 2017 – May 2020) outcome data were collected from randomly selected women post an initial, 27–28 weeks and 35–36 weeks gestation antenatal visit. Logistic regression models assessed intervention effectiveness. Results Five thousand six hundred ninety-four interviews/online questionnaires were completed by pregnant women. The intervention was effective in increasing women’s reported receipt of: assessment of alcohol consumption (OR: 2.63; 95% CI: 2.26–3.05; p < 0.001), advice not to consume alcohol during pregnancy and of potential risks (OR: 2.07; 95% CI: 1.78–2.41; p < 0.001), complete care relevant to alcohol risk level (advice and referral) (OR: 2.10; 95% CI: 1.80–2.44; p < 0.001) and all guideline elements relevant to alcohol risk level (assessment, advice and referral) (OR: 2.32; 95% CI: 1.94–2.76; p < 0.001). Greater intervention effects were found at the 27–28 and 35–36 weeks gestation visits compared with the initial antenatal visit. No differences by sector were found. Almost all women (98.8%) reported that the model of care was acceptable. Conclusions The practice change intervention improved the provision of antenatal care addressing alcohol consumption during pregnancy in public maternity services. Future research could explore the characteristics of pregnant women and maternity services associated with intervention effectiveness as well as the sustainment of care practices over time to inform the need for, and development of, further tailored practice change support. Trial registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Registration number: ACTRN12617000882325; Registration date: 16/06/2017) https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372985&isReview=true
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Doherty
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia. .,School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia. .,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia.
| | - Melanie Kingsland
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia
| | - Elizabeth J Elliott
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
| | - Belinda Tully
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia
| | - Luke Wolfenden
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia
| | - Adrian Dunlop
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia.,Drug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, New South Wales, 2302, Australia
| | - Ian Symonds
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia
| | - John Attia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia
| | - Sarah Ward
- Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education, Deakin, Australian Capital Territory, 2600, Australia
| | - Mandy Hunter
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia
| | - Carol Azzopardi
- Maternity and Gynaecology John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia
| | - Chris Rissel
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Casuarina, Northern Territory, 0909, Australia
| | - Karen Gillham
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia
| | - Tracey W Tsang
- Faculty of Medicine and Health and Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia.,Sydney Children's Hospital Network, Kids' Research Institute, Westmead, New South Wales, 2145, Australia
| | - Penny Reeves
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia
| | - John Wiggers
- Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Wallsend, New South Wales, 2287, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, 2308, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, 2305, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bhaskar R, Srivastava A, Bala R. Awareness, perception, and acceptance of coronavirus vaccines by health-care workers approved for restricted emergency use in India: A web-based cross-sectional study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/ijam.ijam_85_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
10
|
Alkathlan M, Khalil R, Alhemaidani MF, Alaed GH, Almutairi SM, Almalki HA, Alghofaili RH, Al-Wutayd O. Trends, Uptake, and Predictors of Influenza Vaccination Among Healthcare Practitioners During the COVID-19 Pandemic Flu Season (2020) and the Following Season (2021) in Saudi Arabia. J Multidiscip Healthc 2021; 14:2527-2536. [PMID: 34552331 PMCID: PMC8450674 DOI: 10.2147/jmdh.s330029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Healthcare practitioners (HCPs) are at high risk of influenza. Seasonal influenza vaccines can reduce influenza-associated morbidity in healthcare settings, but despite mandatory influenza vaccination in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, the vaccination uptake rate among HCPs is below expectations. This study investigated vaccination trends from 2017 to 2020 to identify factors affecting vaccination among HCPs during the COVID-19 pandemic flu and subsequent seasons. Methods Cross-sectional study among HCPs was conducted in January 2021. A structured questionnaire was shared via social media. Vaccine uptake predictors were identified using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models (p-value 0.05). Results A total of 424 HCPs (118 physicians and 306 nurses) completed the questionnaire. Vaccine uptake increased from 2017 to 2019 (45% to 52% to 62%) but fell (to 59%) during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic flu season. Multivariable analysis indicated participants >40 years old (AOR 3.09, 95% CI 1.64–5.83), female (AOR 1.74, 95% CI 1.13–2.67), non-Saudi (AOR 2.62, 95% CI 1.72–4.01), nurses (AOR 2.70, 95% CI 1.75–4.17), and who possessed accurate knowledge of the flu vaccine efficacy duration (AOR 3.04, 95% CI 1.87–4.94) were more likely to have received the vaccine. However, 79% of HCPs declared their intention to be vaccinated in the 2021 flu season, with participants >40 years old, female (AOR 2.25, 95% CI 1.38–3.68), non-Saudi (AOR 3.79, 95% CI 2.34–6.16), or nurses (AOR 2.94, 95% CI 1.82–4.76) more likely to do so. Conclusion Influenza vaccination uptake declined among HCPs during the 2020 flu season compared with the previous season but is expected to increase in the upcoming 2021 season. Nevertheless, the findings are encouraging and indicate increased willingness of HCPs to become vaccinated in the upcoming 2021 season, but coverage could be further increased by policymakers via a comprehensive plan focusing particularly on younger HCPs, Saudis, males, and physicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Alkathlan
- Department of Infectious Diseases, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Buraydah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Rehana Khalil
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Munirah F Alhemaidani
- Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ghadah H Alaed
- Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shatha M Almutairi
- Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hala A Almalki
- Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Renad H Alghofaili
- Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Osama Al-Wutayd
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, Unaizah College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Qassim University, Unaizah, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bakhuys Roozeboom MC, Wiezer NM, Boot CRL, Bongers PM, Schelvis RMC. Use of Intervention Mapping for Occupational Risk Prevention and Health Promotion: A Systematic Review of Literature. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18041775. [PMID: 33670376 PMCID: PMC7918071 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18041775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Aim: Intervention mapping (IM) is a method to systematically design interventions that is applied regularly within the public health domain. This study investigates whether IM is effectively used within the occupational safety and health domain as well. Specifically, this study explores the relation between the fidelity regarding the use of the IM protocol for intervention development, the implementation process and the effectiveness of the occupational risk prevention and health promotion interventions. Methods: A systematic review was conducted including articles on development, implementation, and effects of occupational risk prevention and health promotion interventions that were developed according to the IM-protocol. By means of a checklist, two authors reviewed the articles and rated them on several indicators regarding the fidelity of the IM-protocol, the implementation process, and the intervention effect. Results: A literature search resulted in a total of 12 interventions as described in 38 articles. The fidelity to the IM-protocol was relatively low for participation throughout the development process and implementation planning. No relationship was found between fidelity of the IM-protocol and the intervention effect. A theory-based approach (as one of the core elements of IM) appears to be positively related to a successful implementation process. Conclusion: Results of the review suggest that organizing a participative approach and implementation planning is difficult in practice. In addition, results imply that conducting matrices of change objectives as part of the intervention development, although challenging and time-consuming, may ultimately pay off, resulting in a tailored intervention that matches the target group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maartje C. Bakhuys Roozeboom
- Department of Healthy Living, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Schipholweg 77, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands; (N.M.W.); (P.M.B.)
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam UMC, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
- Correspondence:
| | - Noortje M. Wiezer
- Department of Healthy Living, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Schipholweg 77, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands; (N.M.W.); (P.M.B.)
| | - Cécile R. L. Boot
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam UMC, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Paulien M. Bongers
- Department of Healthy Living, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Schipholweg 77, 2316 ZL Leiden, The Netherlands; (N.M.W.); (P.M.B.)
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, VU University, Amsterdam UMC, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lawes-Wickwar S, Ghio D, Tang MY, Keyworth C, Stanescu S, Westbrook J, Jenkinson E, Kassianos AP, Scanlan D, Garnett N, Laidlaw L, Howlett N, Carr N, Stanulewicz N, Guest E, Watson D, Sutherland L, Byrne-Davis L, Chater A, Hart J, Armitage CJ, Shorter GW, Swanson V, Epton T. A Rapid Systematic Review of Public Responses to Health Messages Encouraging Vaccination against Infectious Diseases in a Pandemic or Epidemic. Vaccines (Basel) 2021; 9:72. [PMID: 33498395 PMCID: PMC7909419 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Public health teams need to understand how the public responds to vaccination messages in a pandemic or epidemic to inform successful campaigns encouraging the uptake of new vaccines as they become available. A rapid systematic review was performed by searching PsycINFO, MEDLINE, healthevidence.org, OSF Preprints and PsyArXiv Preprints in May 2020 for studies including at least one health message promoting vaccine uptake of airborne-, droplet- and fomite-spread viruses. Included studies were assessed for quality using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) or the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), and for patient and public involvement (PPI) in the research. Thirty-five articles were included. Most reported messages for seasonal influenza (n = 11; 31%) or H1N1 (n = 11; 31%). Evidence from moderate to high quality studies for improving vaccine uptake included providing information about virus risks and vaccination safety, as well as addressing vaccine misunderstandings, offering vaccination reminders, including vaccination clinic details, and delivering mixed media campaigns across hospitals or communities. Behavioural influences (beliefs and intentions) were improved when: shorter, risk-reducing or relative risk framing messages were used; the benefits of vaccination to society were emphasised; and beliefs about capability and concerns among target populations (e.g., vaccine safety) were addressed. Clear, credible, messages in a language target groups can understand were associated with higher acceptability. Two studies (6%) described PPI in the research process. Future campaigns should consider the beliefs and information needs of target populations in their design, including ensuring that vaccine eligibility and availability is clear, and messages are accessible. More high quality research is needed to demonstrate the effects of messaging interventions on actual vaccine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sadie Lawes-Wickwar
- Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK
| | - Daniela Ghio
- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Society, University of Salford, Manchester M6 6PU, UK;
| | - Mei Yee Tang
- Behavioural Science Policy Research Unit, Population Health Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AX, UK;
| | - Chris Keyworth
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (C.K.); (L.B.-D.); (J.H.); (C.J.A.); (T.E.)
| | - Sabina Stanescu
- School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK;
| | | | - Elizabeth Jenkinson
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of West England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK; (E.J.); (N.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Angelos P. Kassianos
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK;
| | - Daniel Scanlan
- Department of Communication, Policy, and Research, Education Support, London N5 1EW, UK;
| | - Natalie Garnett
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of West England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK; (E.J.); (N.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Lynn Laidlaw
- Public Contributor, Health Psychology Exchange Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Group, UK;
| | - Neil Howlett
- Department of Psychology, Sports, and Geography, School of Life and Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hertfordshire AL10 9AB, UK;
| | - Natalie Carr
- Faculty of Health, Psychology, and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester M15 6BH, UK;
| | - Natalia Stanulewicz
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, School of Applied Social Sciences, De Montfort University, Leicester LE1 9BH, UK;
| | - Ella Guest
- Department of Health and Social Sciences, University of West England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK; (E.J.); (N.G.); (E.G.)
| | - Daniella Watson
- Global Health Research Institute, Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
| | | | - Lucie Byrne-Davis
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (C.K.); (L.B.-D.); (J.H.); (C.J.A.); (T.E.)
- Division of Medical Education, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Angel Chater
- Centre for Health, Wellbeing and Behaviour Change, University of Bedfordshire, Bedford, Bedfordshire MK41 9EA, UK;
| | - Jo Hart
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (C.K.); (L.B.-D.); (J.H.); (C.J.A.); (T.E.)
- Division of Medical Education, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Christopher J. Armitage
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (C.K.); (L.B.-D.); (J.H.); (C.J.A.); (T.E.)
- NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester M13 9WL, UK
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester M13 9NQ, UK
| | - Gillian W. Shorter
- Centre for Improving Health Related Quality of Life, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT7 1NN, UK;
| | - Vivien Swanson
- Department of Psychology, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK;
| | - Tracy Epton
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; (C.K.); (L.B.-D.); (J.H.); (C.J.A.); (T.E.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Promoting Influenza Vaccination among Staff of Nursing Homes According to Behavioral Insights: Analyzing the Choice Architecture during a Nudge-Based Intervention. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:vaccines8040600. [PMID: 33053868 PMCID: PMC7712811 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8040600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2020] [Revised: 10/05/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Influenza vaccination uptake in nursing home (NH) workers is uncommon. The aim of this study was to understand the choice architecture of influenza vaccination acceptance or refusal among them and to promote vaccination acceptance using the nudge approach. (2) Methods: In autumn 2019, a nudge intervention with a contextual qualitative analysis of choice architecture of vaccination was performed among the staff of eight Tuscan NHs. In summer 2020, a cross-sectional study including the staff of 111 NHs (8 in the nudge, 103 in the comparison group) was conducted to assess the impact of the nudge intervention in promoting vaccination uptake. (3) Results: Macro-categories of motivations for vaccination uptake that emerged from the qualitative analysis were risk perception, value dimension, and trust, while those regarding refusal were risk perception, distrust, value dimension, and reasons related to one’s health. Considering the cross-sectional study, influenza vaccination uptake in the 2018–2019 season was similar in the two groups (23.6% vs. 22.2% respectively, in the nudge and comparison group), but significantly different in the 2019–2020 season: 28% in the nudge vs. 20% in the comparison group. Also, the intention to get the vaccine in the 2020–2021 season was significantly different in the two groups: 37.9% in the nudge and 30.8% in the comparison group. (4) Conclusions: Nudge interventions-simple, fast, low cost-could be effective in promoting vaccination acceptance among NH workers and the analysis of choice architecture could be useful in improving tailored, new nudge interventions aimed at modifying irrational biased and cognitive errors.
Collapse
|
14
|
Bechini A, Lorini C, Zanobini P, Mandò Tacconi F, Boccalini S, Grazzini M, Bonanni P, Bonaccorsi G. Utility of Healthcare System-Based Interventions in Improving the Uptake of Influenza Vaccination in Healthcare Workers at Long-Term Care Facilities: A Systematic Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:vaccines8020165. [PMID: 32260594 PMCID: PMC7348755 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8020165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Healthcare workers (HCWs) in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) can represent a source of influenza infection for the elderly. While flu vaccination coverage (VC) is satisfactory in the elderly, HCWs are less likely to be vaccinated. There is no definitive evidence on which types of healthcare system-based interventions at LTCFs would be more useful in improving the vaccination uptake among HCWs. We performed a systematic review in different databases (Pubmed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Health Evidence, Web of Science, Cinahl) to provide a synthesis of the available studies on this topic. Among the 1177 articles screened by their titles and abstracts, 27 were included in this review. Most of the studies reported multiple interventions addressed to improve access to vaccination, eliminate individual barriers, or introduce policy interventions. As expected, mandatory vaccinations seem to be the most useful intervention to increase the vaccination uptake in HCWs. However, our study suggests that better results in the vaccination uptake in HCWs were obtained by combining interventions in different areas. Educational campaigns alone could not have an impact on vaccination coverage. LTCFs represent an ideal setting to perform preventive multi-approach interventions for the epidemiological transition toward aging and chronicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Bechini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.B.); (C.L.); (S.B.); (P.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Chiara Lorini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.B.); (C.L.); (S.B.); (P.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Patrizio Zanobini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.B.); (C.L.); (S.B.); (P.B.); (G.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-366-343-5179
| | - Francesco Mandò Tacconi
- Nuovo Ospedale delle Apuane, North-West Tuscany LHU, Via Enrico Mattei, 21, 54100 Massa, Italy;
| | - Sara Boccalini
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.B.); (C.L.); (S.B.); (P.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Maddalena Grazzini
- Careggi, University Hospital, Largo G. Alessandro Brambilla, 3, 50134 Florence, Italy;
| | - Paolo Bonanni
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.B.); (C.L.); (S.B.); (P.B.); (G.B.)
| | - Guglielmo Bonaccorsi
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Viale GB Morgagni 48, 50134 Florence, Italy; (A.B.); (C.L.); (S.B.); (P.B.); (G.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Health Literacy, Vaccine Confidence and Influenza Vaccination Uptake among Nursing Home Staff: A Cross-Sectional Study Conducted in Tuscany. Vaccines (Basel) 2020; 8:vaccines8020154. [PMID: 32235481 PMCID: PMC7348841 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines8020154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/29/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/28/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this cross-sectional study is to address whether health literacy (HL) and vaccine confidence are related with influenza vaccination uptake among staff of nursing homes (NHs). It was conducted in Tuscany (Italy) in autumn 2018, including the staff of 28 NHs. A questionnaire was used to collect individual data regarding influenza vaccination in 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 seasons; the intention to be vaccinated in 2018–2019; as well as demographic, educational, and health information. It included also the Italian Medical Term Recognition (IMETER) test to measure HL and eight Likert-type statements to calculate a Vaccine Confidence Index (VCI). The number of employees that fulfilled the questionnaire was 710. The percentage of influenza vaccination uptake was low: only 9.6% got vaccinated in 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 and intended to vaccinate in 2018–2019. The VCI score and the IMETER-adjusted scores were weakly correlated (Rho = 0.156). At the multinomial logistic regression analysis, the VCI was a positive predictor of vaccination uptake. In conclusion, vaccine confidence is the strongest predictor of influenza vaccination uptake among the staff of NHs. The development of an adequate vaccine literacy measurement tool could be useful to understand whether skills could be related to vaccine confidence.
Collapse
|
16
|
Borgey F, Henry L, Lebeltel J, Lescure P, Le Coutour X, Vabret A, Verdon R, Thibon P. Effectiveness of an intervention campaign on influenza vaccination of professionals in nursing homes: A cluster-randomized controlled trial. Vaccine 2019; 37:1260-1265. [PMID: 30738645 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.01.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2018] [Revised: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seasonal influenza has a major individual and collective impact, especially among the elderly living in nursing homes. To prevent infection by influenza viruses, vaccination of residents and professionals is an essential measure. However, while the vaccination rates of residents are generally high (>85%), rates among professionals are generally approximately 20%. To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention campaign on the improvement of the influenza vaccination rate of professionals, a regional intervention study was proposed for nursing homes during the 2014-15 season. METHODS Cluster-randomized controlled trial (with a nursing home representing a cluster). In the intervention group, a campaign on influenza vaccination was offered to staff, combining different teaching aids in a multimodal approach. In the control group, no intervention was proposed. The primary endpoint was the rate of influenza vaccination among staff. Before and after the study, professionals were asked to complete short questionnaires on their perceptions of influenza vaccination. A multilevel analysis was carried out to compare the vaccination rates between the 2 groups and their evolution before/after the winter period. RESULTS A total of 32 nursing homes were randomized, and 6 were excluded. Initial vaccination rates were 27.6% in the intervention group and 24.2% in the control group (p = 0.16). After the study, these rates increased to 33.7% and 22.9%, respectively, which was a relative difference of +22.1% in the intervention group compared to -5.4% in the control group, p = 0.0025. CONCLUSIONS Despite professionals' reluctance to be vaccinate, participation in a promotional campaign with a pragmatic approach has increased the rate of influenza vaccination. The approach will be offered to all nursing homes in the region after revision of the tools to enhance their ease of use and pedagogical messages focused on the direct benefits to professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Pascale Lescure
- CHU de Caen, Département filière gériatrique-Médecine, Caen F-14000, France
| | - Xavier Le Coutour
- CHU de Caen, Service d'Hygiène Hospitalière, Caen F-14000, France; Université de Caen Normandie, Medical School, Caen F-14000, France
| | - Astrid Vabret
- Université de Caen Normandie, Medical School, Caen F-14000, France; CHU de Caen, Laboratoire de Virologie, Caen F-14000, France
| | - Renaud Verdon
- Université de Caen Normandie, Medical School, Caen F-14000, France; CHU de Caen, Service de Maladies Infectieuses, Caen F-14000, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Majid U, Kim C, Cako A, Gagliardi AR. Engaging stakeholders in the co-development of programs or interventions using Intervention Mapping: A scoping review. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0209826. [PMID: 30586425 PMCID: PMC6306258 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health care innovations tailored to stakeholder context are more readily adopted. This study aimed to describe how Intervention Mapping (IM) was used to design health care innovations and how stakeholders were involved. METHODS A scoping review was conducted. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Scopus and Science Citation Index were searched from 2008 to November 2017. English language studies that used or cited Intervention Mapping were eligible. Screening and data extraction were done in triplicate. Summary statistics were used to describe study characteristics, IM steps employed, and stakeholder involvement. RESULTS A total of 852 studies were identified, 449 were unique, and 333 were excluded based on title and abstracts, 116 full-text articles were considered and 61 articles representing 60 studies from 13 countries for a variety of clinical issues were included. The number of studies published per year increased since 2008 and doubled in 2016 and 2017. The majority of studies employed multiple research methods (76.7%) and all 6 IM steps (73.3%). Resulting programs/interventions were single (55.4%) or multifaceted (46.4%), and 60.7% were pilot-tested. Programs or interventions were largely educational material or meetings, and were targeted to patients (70.2%), clinicians (14.0%) or both (15.8%). Studies provided few details about current or planned evaluation. Of the 4 (9.3%) studies that reported impact or outcomes, 3 achieved positive improvements in patient or professional behaviour or patient outcomes. Many studies (28.3%) did not involve stakeholders. Those that did (71.7%) often involved a combination of patients, clinicians, and community organizations. However, less than half (48.8%) described how they were engaged. Most often stakeholders were committee members and provide feedback on program or intervention content or format. CONCLUSIONS It is unclear if use of IM or stakeholder engagement in IM consistently results in effective programs or interventions. Those employing IM should report how stakeholders were involved in each IM step and how involvement influenced program or intervention design. They should also report the details or absence of planned evaluation. Future research should investigate how to optimize stakeholder engagement in IM, and whether use of IM itself or stakeholder engagement in IM are positively associated with effective programs or interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umair Majid
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Claire Kim
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Albina Cako
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Anna R. Gagliardi
- Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Boey L, Bral C, Roelants M, De Schryver A, Godderis L, Hoppenbrouwers K, Vandermeulen C. Attitudes, believes, determinants and organisational barriers behind the low seasonal influenza vaccination uptake in healthcare workers - A cross-sectional survey. Vaccine 2018; 36:3351-3358. [PMID: 29716777 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Revised: 04/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Seasonal influenza threatens hospitalised patients and residents of nursing homes annually. Due to age and chronic disease their protection following immunisation is diminished. Additional immunisation of direct contacts and in particular healthcare workers (HCWs) has proven added value. As vaccination coverage in HCWs remains low, we aimed to gain insight in the factors behind the demotivation for influenza vaccination. METHODS Attitudes and believes towards influenza vaccination and socio-demographic and professional determinants were surveyed in 5141 Belgian HCWs from 13 hospitals and 14 nursing homes. Additionally, influenza campaign coordinators of the participating healthcare institutions were interviewed about the factors of success/failure in their campaigns. RESULTS The mean vaccination coverage registered by the participating healthcare institutions was 40.4% in the hospitals and 45.3% in the nursing homes. Overall, up to 90% of HCWs found it important not to infect their patients. However, only 20% of non-vaccinated HCWs considered influenza vaccination a duty to not harm their patients. Up to 40% of unvaccinated staff believed they could get influenza after vaccination and that vaccination weakens their immune system. Also, only about 20% of unvaccinated staff thought to have a high chance of getting influenza. Reasons for unvaccinated staff to get vaccinated in the future are self-protection and protection of family members. Factors that positively influenced vaccination coverage are encouragement by supervisors (OR, hospitals: 7.1, p < 0.001; nursing homes: 7.5, p < 0.001) and well-organized vaccination campaigns with on-site vaccination. Factors that negatively affected vaccination coverage are misconceptions about influenza and its vaccine (OR, range 0.1-0.7, p < 0.001 for most misconceptions) and underestimation of the risk of contracting influenza by patients or HCWs (OR of perceived susceptibility, range 2.1-5.1, p < 0.001 for most factors). CONCLUSION There is a need for guidance for the organization of seasonal influenza campaigns, in which education, communication and easy accessible vaccination are promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lise Boey
- Leuven University Vaccinology Center, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Charlotte Bral
- Leuven University Vaccinology Center, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mathieu Roelants
- Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Antoon De Schryver
- Department of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Antwerp, Belgium; IDEWE Occupational Health Services, Heverlee-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lode Godderis
- Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium; IDEWE Occupational Health Services, Heverlee-Leuven, Belgium
| | - Karel Hoppenbrouwers
- Leuven University Vaccinology Center, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium; Environment and Health, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Belgium
| | - Corinne Vandermeulen
- Leuven University Vaccinology Center, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sundaram N, Duckett K, Yung CF, Thoon KC, Sidharta S, Venkatachalam I, Chow A, Yoong J. “I wouldn’t really believe statistics” – Challenges with influenza vaccine acceptance among healthcare workers in Singapore. Vaccine 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.02.102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
20
|
Lytras T, Kopsachilis F, Mouratidou E, Papamichail D, Bonovas S. Interventions to increase seasonal influenza vaccine coverage in healthcare workers: A systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2017; 12:671-81. [PMID: 26619125 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1106656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 87] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Influenza vaccination is recommended for healthcare workers (HCWs), but coverage is often low. We reviewed studies evaluating interventions to increase seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in HCWs, including a meta-regression analysis to quantify the effect of each component. Fourty-six eligible studies were identified. Domains conferring a high risk of bias were identified in most studies. Mandatory vaccination was the most effective intervention component (Risk Ratio of being unvaccinated [RRunvacc] = 0.18, 95% CI: 0.08-0.45), followed by "soft" mandates such as declination statements (RRunvacc = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.45-0.92), increased awareness (RRunvacc = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.97) and increased access (RRunvacc = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.78-1.00). For incentives the difference was not significant, while for education no effect was observed. Heterogeneity was substantial (τ(2) = 0.083). These results indicate that effective alternatives to mandatory HCWs influenza vaccination do exist, and need to be further explored in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodore Lytras
- a Department of Epidemiological Surveillance and Intervention , Hellenic Centre for Disease Control and Prevention , Athens , Greece.,b Centre for Research in Environmental Epidemiology (CREAL) , Barcelona , Spain.,c Department of Experimental and Health Sciences , Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF) , Barcelona , Spain
| | - Frixos Kopsachilis
- d Department of Occupational and Industrial Hygiene , National School of Public Health , Athens , Greece
| | - Elisavet Mouratidou
- a Department of Epidemiological Surveillance and Intervention , Hellenic Centre for Disease Control and Prevention , Athens , Greece
| | - Dimitris Papamichail
- e Department of Child Health , National School of Public Health , Athens , Greece
| | - Stefanos Bonovas
- f Humanitas Clinical and Research Center , Rozzano , Milan , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen CH, Wu MS, Hsu WY, Chen YM, Hsu CC, Hsiung CA, Wu IC. Determinants of influenza vaccination in older adults: A nationwide community-based study in Taiwan. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17:2396-2402. [PMID: 28753227 DOI: 10.1111/ggi.13088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2016] [Revised: 03/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
AIMS Influenza vaccination (InVa) is an effective measure for preventing influenza infection, which is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults. However, the determinants of InVa remain unclear. METHODS The present study included 4756 adults aged 55 years and older who completed the baseline examination of the Healthy Aging Longitudinal Study in Taiwan. During the examination, each participant received assessments of InVa status. Comprehensive assessments of sociodemographic (age, sex, education level, marital status, living alone and occupation) and health-related factors (chronic diseases, smoking status, alcohol intake, physical activities, cognitive status and physical performance) were also carried out. The InVa rate was defined as the number of participants who reported receiving free InVa divided by the total number of candidates for free InVa. Multinomial logistic regression analysis was applied to investigate the sociodemographic and health-related determinants of InVa status. RESULTS The coverage rate of InVa was 44.8% (2130/4756). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [OR; >75 years vs <65 years] 7.72, 95% CI 6.26-9.52), multiple chronic diseases (OR [≥2 vs 0)] 1.31, 95% CI 1.10-1.65) and physical activity (OR [yes vs no] 1.43, 95% CI 1.23-1.64) were positively associated with receiving InVa. A current smoking status (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.82) was negatively associated with receiving InVa. CONCLUSIONS Older adults who received InVa differed from non-receivers in multiple sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. These findings support continual efforts to improve the InVa coverage rate in vulnerable populations. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 2396-2402.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang-Hua Chen
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua City, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yu Hsu
- Department of Psychiatry, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Min Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Cheng Hsu
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
| | - Chao A Hsiung
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
| | - I-Chien Wu
- Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Zhunan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Garba RM, Gadanya MA. The role of intervention mapping in designing disease prevention interventions: A systematic review of the literature. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0174438. [PMID: 28358821 PMCID: PMC5373531 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2015] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the role of Intervention Mapping (IM) in designing disease prevention interventions worldwide. Methods Systematic search and review of the relevant literature—peer-reviewed and grey—was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Findings Only five of the twenty two included studies reviewed were RCTs that compared intervention using IM protocol with placebo intervention, and provided the outcomes in terms of percentage increase in the uptake of disease-prevention programmes, and only one of the five studies provided an effect measure in the form of relative risk (RR = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.08–2.34, p = 0.02). Of the five RCTs, three were rated as strong evidences, one as a medium evidence and one as a weak evidence, and they all reported statistically significant difference between the two study groups, with disease prevention interventions that have used the intervention mapping approach generally reported significant increases in the uptake of disease-prevention interventions, ranging from 9% to 28.5% (0.0001 ≤ p ≤ 0.02), On the other hand, all the 22 studies have successfully identified the determinants of the uptake of disease prevention interventions that is essential to the success of disease prevention programmes. Conclusion Intervention Mapping has been successfully used to plan, implement and evaluate interventions that showed significant increase in uptake of disease prevention programmes. This study has provided a good understanding of the role of intervention mapping in designing disease prevention interventions, and a good foundation upon which subsequent reviews can be guided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rayyan M. Garba
- Department of Community Medicine, Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
- * E-mail:
| | - Muktar A. Gadanya
- Department of Community Medicine, Bayero University/ Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital, Kano, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Rashid H, Yin JK, Ward K, King C, Seale H, Booy R. Assessing Interventions To Improve Influenza Vaccine Uptake Among Health Care Workers. Health Aff (Millwood) 2017; 35:284-92. [PMID: 26858382 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Despite official recommendations for health care workers to receive the influenza vaccine, uptake remains low. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials was conducted to understand the evidence about interventions to improve influenza vaccine uptake among health care workers. We identified twelve randomized controlled trials that, collectively, assessed six major categories of interventions involving 193,924 health care workers in high-income countries. The categories were educational materials and training sessions, improved access to the vaccine, rewards following vaccination, organized efforts to raise vaccine awareness, reminders to get vaccinated, and the use of lead advocates for vaccination. Only one of the four studies that evaluated the effect of a single intervention in isolation demonstrated a significantly higher vaccine uptake rate in the intervention group, compared to controls. However, five of the eight studies that evaluated a combination of strategies showed significantly higher vaccine uptake. Despite the low quality of the studies identified, the data suggest that combined interventions can moderately increase vaccine uptake among health care workers. Further methodologically appropriate trials of combined interventions tailored to individual health care settings and incorporating less-studied strategies would enhance the evidence about interventions to improve immunization uptake among health care workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harunor Rashid
- Harunor Rashid is an epidemiologist in the National Centre for Immunisation Resarch and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases (NCIRS), Kids Research Institute, Children's Hospital at Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jiehui Kevin Yin
- Jiehui Kevin Yin is a conjoint lecturer at the Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, in New South Wales
| | - Kirsten Ward
- Kirsten Ward is a monitoring and evaluation officer at the NCIRS, Kids Research Institute, Children's Hospital at Westmead
| | - Catherine King
- Catherine King is a medical librarian at the NCIRS, Kids Research Institute, Children's Hospital at Westmead
| | - Holly Seale
- Holly Seale is a senior lecturer in the School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, in Sydney
| | - Robert Booy
- Robert Booy is head of clinical research at the NCIRS, Kids Research Institute, Children's Hospital at Westmead
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Hulo S, Nuvoli A, Sobaszek A, Salembier-Trichard A. Knowledge and attitudes towards influenza vaccination of health care workers in emergency services. Vaccine 2016; 35:205-207. [PMID: 27919630 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.11.086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2016] [Accepted: 11/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Annual vaccination rates among French health care workers (HCWs) are in decline even in Emergency Services to which patients at highest risk of influenza complications are admitted, and in which HCWs have the greatest risk of exposure to influenza from patients. We aimed here to identify knowledge and attitudes towards influenza vaccination of HCWs in Emergency Services. We collected 344 self-administered questionnaires of 1060 HCWs. Only 18% of HCWs were vaccinated against influenza. Physicians were vaccinated more often (55%) than nurses (16%) or aid nurses (11%). The most important barriers to vaccination were reported as being a lack of time (33%), lack of safety of the vaccine (31%), fear of contracting influenza due to vaccination (29%), and lack of effectiveness (23%). Being vaccinated was significantly related to a higher knowledge score based on epidemiological influenza items (OR (95% CI)) (1.63 (1.08-2.46)) and vaccine features items (2.36 (1.36-4.10)).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sébastien Hulo
- Univ. Lille, EA 4483 - IMPECS - IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine, F-59000 Lille, France; CHU Lille, Service des Exploration Fonctionnelles Respiratoires, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Alexandra Nuvoli
- CHU Lille, Service de Médecine du Travail du Personnel Hospitalier, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | - Annie Sobaszek
- Univ. Lille, EA 4483 - IMPECS - IMPact de l'Environnement Chimique sur la Santé humaine, F-59000 Lille, France; CHU Lille, Service de Médecine du Travail du Personnel Hospitalier, F-59000 Lille, France.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Contal E, Putot A, Dipanda M, Perrin S, Asgassou S, Sordet-Guépet H, Manckoundia P. [The seasonal flu vaccination among caregivers in geriatric units: Up-to-date]. Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique 2016; 64:415-423. [PMID: 27816309 DOI: 10.1016/j.respe.2016.06.333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2014] [Revised: 06/03/2016] [Accepted: 06/27/2016] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Flu vaccinations for healthcare professionals seems to be one of the most effective preventive actions in the face of a disease that carries a high risk of a potentially serious nosocomial epidemic in a geriatric environment. The aim of this study was to take stock of the flu vaccination status among caregivers in the geriatric units and to understand the reasons for their reluctance to be vaccinated, in order to put forward proposals to improve vaccination coverage. METHOD A literature search of articles published since 2000 in the area of geriatrics, infectious diseases or pneumology was mainly conducted on PubMed using the keywords "caregivers", "elderly", "flu", "influenza", "nosocomial" and "vaccination". After reading all abstracts in English or French and ruling out irrelevant articles, only 64 relevant articles have been listed in bibliography section. RESULTS Despite official recommendations, the literature reveals insufficient vaccination coverage of healthcare personnel at both the national and international level. Vaccination coverage seems to be lower among younger female non-medical staff. The factors that determine the likelihood of vaccination are the wish to protect one's self, one's family and patients/residents, as well as the experience of earlier bouts of flu. Factors that oppose vaccination are complex and related to the fear of side effects, the use of other preventive measures, the feeling that vaccination is ineffective, poor understanding of the disease and the vaccine, forgetfulness and problems of organization. Campaigns to promote vaccination that target healthcare professionals must be multidimensional and very incentive. The pedagogical message must be centered on the benefits to the individual and adjusted to socio-professional categories. Mobile strategies in the different departments to encourage staff are a pragmatic solution to this challenge. The referring doctor has an essential role to play, as does the occupational doctor in association with the hospital hygiene services. CONCLUSION Flu vaccinations must be included in the education and training of caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Contal
- Service de médecine A, centre hospitalier de Langres, 10, rue de la Charité, 52200 Langres, France
| | - A Putot
- Service de médecine interne gériatrie, hôpital de Champmaillot, CHU, BP 87909, 2, rue Jules-Violle, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - M Dipanda
- Service de médecine interne gériatrie, hôpital de Champmaillot, CHU, BP 87909, 2, rue Jules-Violle, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - S Perrin
- Service de médecine interne gériatrie, hôpital de Champmaillot, CHU, BP 87909, 2, rue Jules-Violle, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - S Asgassou
- Service de médecine interne gériatrie, hôpital de Champmaillot, CHU, BP 87909, 2, rue Jules-Violle, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - H Sordet-Guépet
- Service de médecine interne gériatrie, hôpital de Champmaillot, CHU, BP 87909, 2, rue Jules-Violle, 21079 Dijon cedex, France
| | - P Manckoundia
- Service de médecine interne gériatrie, hôpital de Champmaillot, CHU, BP 87909, 2, rue Jules-Violle, 21079 Dijon cedex, France; Inserm U1093 cognition, action, et plasticité sensorimotrice, université de Bourgogne-Franche-Comté, UFR STAPS, 21078 Dijon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Asma S, Akan H, Uysal Y, Poçan AG, Sucaklı MH, Yengil E, Gereklioğlu Ç, Korur A, Başhan İ, Erdogan AF, Özşahin AK, Kut A. Factors effecting influenza vaccination uptake among health care workers: a multi-center cross-sectional study. BMC Infect Dis 2016; 16:192. [PMID: 27142774 PMCID: PMC4855819 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-016-1528-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2015] [Accepted: 04/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The present study aimed to identify factors affecting vaccination against influenza among health professionals. METHODS We used a multi-centre cross-sectional design to conduct an online self-administered questionnaire with physicians and nurses at state and foundation university hospitals in the south-east of Turkey, between 1 January 2015 and 1 February 2015. The five participating hospitals provided staff email address lists filtered for physicians and nurses. The questionnaire comprised multiple choice questions covering demographic data, knowledge sources, and Likert-type items on factors affecting vaccination against influenza. The target response rate was 20 %. RESULTS In total, 642 (22 %) of 2870 health professionals (1220 physicians and 1650 nurses) responded to the questionnaire. Participants' mean age was 29.6 ± 9.2 years (range 17-62 years); 177 (28.2 %) were physicians and 448 (71.3 %) were nurses. The rate of regular vaccination was 9.2 % (15.2 % for physicians and 8.2 % for nurses). Increasing age, longer work duration in health services, being male, being a physician, working in an internal medicine department, having a chronic disease, and living with a person over 65 years old significantly increased vaccination compliance (p < 0.05). We found differences between vaccine compliant and non-compliant groups for expected benefit from vaccination, social influences, and personal efficacy (p < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed differences between the groups in perceptions of personal risks, side effects, and efficacy of the vaccine (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis found that important factors influencing vaccination behavior were work place, colleagues' opinions, having a chronic disease, belief that vaccination was effective, and belief that flu can be prevented by natural ways. CONCLUSION Numerous factors influence health professionals' decisions about influenza vaccination. Strategies to increase the ratio of vaccination among physicians and nurses should consider all of these factors to increase the likelihood of success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Süheyl Asma
- Department of Family Medicine, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Bağlıca Kampüsü Eskişehir Yolu 20. km Bağlıca, Ankara, 06810, Turkey.
| | - Hülya Akan
- Department of Family Medicine, Yeditepe University Faculty of Medicine, İnönü Mahallesi, Kayışdağı Cad., 26 Ağustos Yerleşimi, Kadıköy, İstanbul, 34755, Turkey
| | - Yücel Uysal
- Department of Family Medicine, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Çiftlikköy Kampusu, Mersin, 33343, Turkey
| | - A Gürhan Poçan
- Department of Family Medicine, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Bağlıca Kampüsü Eskişehir Yolu 20. km Bağlıca, Ankara, 06810, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Haki Sucaklı
- Department of Family Medicine Sütçü İmam University Faculty of Medicine, Avşar Kampüsü, Kahramanmaraş, 46100, Turkey
| | - Erhan Yengil
- Department of Family Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine, Ürgen Paşa Mh, Hatay, 31030, Turkey
| | - Çiğdem Gereklioğlu
- Department of Family Medicine, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Bağlıca Kampüsü Eskişehir Yolu 20. km Bağlıca, Ankara, 06810, Turkey
| | - Aslı Korur
- Department of Family Medicine, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Bağlıca Kampüsü Eskişehir Yolu 20. km Bağlıca, Ankara, 06810, Turkey
| | - İbrahim Başhan
- Department of Family Medicine, Mersin University Faculty of Medicine, Çiftlikköy Kampusu, Mersin, 33343, Turkey
| | - A Ferit Erdogan
- Department of Family Medicine, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Bağlıca Kampüsü Eskişehir Yolu 20. km Bağlıca, Ankara, 06810, Turkey
| | - A Kürşat Özşahin
- Department of Family Medicine, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Bağlıca Kampüsü Eskişehir Yolu 20. km Bağlıca, Ankara, 06810, Turkey
| | - Altuğ Kut
- Department of Family Medicine, Başkent University Faculty of Medicine, Bağlıca Kampüsü Eskişehir Yolu 20. km Bağlıca, Ankara, 06810, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Akan H, Yavuz E, Yayla M, Külbay H, Kaspar E, Zahmacıoğlu O, Badur S. Factors affecting uptake of influenza vaccination among family physicians. Vaccine 2016; 34:1712-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2015] [Revised: 12/14/2015] [Accepted: 01/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
28
|
Baker R, Camosso‐Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, Robertson N, Wensing M, Fiander M, Eccles MP, Godycki‐Cwirko M, van Lieshout J, Jäger C. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; 2015:CD005470. [PMID: 25923419 PMCID: PMC7271646 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005470.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 307] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tailored intervention strategies are frequently recommended among approaches to the implementation of improvement in health professional performance. Attempts to change the behaviour of health professionals may be impeded by a variety of different barriers, obstacles, or factors (which we collectively refer to as determinants of practice). Change may be more likely if implementation strategies are specifically chosen to address these determinants. OBJECTIVES To determine whether tailored intervention strategies are effective in improving professional practice and healthcare outcomes. We compared interventions tailored to address the identified determinants of practice with either no intervention or interventions not tailored to the determinants. SEARCH METHODS We conducted searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, CINAHL, and the British Nursing Index to May 2014. We conducted a final search in December 2014 (in MEDLINE only) for more recently published trials. We conducted searches of the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) in March 2013. We also handsearched two journals. SELECTION CRITERIA Cluster-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of interventions tailored to address prospectively identified determinants of practice, which reported objectively measured professional practice or healthcare outcomes, and where at least one group received an intervention designed to address prospectively identified determinants of practice. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently assessed quality and extracted data. We undertook qualitative and quantitative analyses, the quantitative analysis including two elements: we carried out 1) meta-regression analyses to compare interventions tailored to address identified determinants with either no interventions or an intervention(s) not tailored to the determinants, and 2) heterogeneity analyses to investigate sources of differences in the effectiveness of interventions. These included the effects of: risk of bias, use of a theory when developing the intervention, whether adjustment was made for local factors, and number of domains addressed with the determinants identified. MAIN RESULTS We added nine studies to this review to bring the total number of included studies to 32 comparing an intervention tailored to address identified determinants of practice to no intervention or an intervention(s) not tailored to the determinants. The outcome was implementation of recommended practice, e.g. clinical practice guideline recommendations. Fifteen studies provided enough data to be included in the quantitative analysis. The pooled odds ratio was 1.56 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.27 to 1.93, P value < 0.001). The 17 studies not included in the meta-analysis had findings showing variable effectiveness consistent with the findings of the meta-regression. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Despite the increase in the number of new studies identified, our overall finding is similar to that of the previous review. Tailored implementation can be effective, but the effect is variable and tends to be small to moderate. The number of studies remains small and more research is needed, including trials comparing tailored interventions to no or other interventions, but also studies to develop and investigate the components of tailoring (identification of the most important determinants, selecting interventions to address the determinants). Currently available studies have used different methods to identify determinants of practice and different approaches to selecting interventions to address the determinants. It is not yet clear how best to tailor interventions and therefore not clear what the effect of an optimally tailored intervention would be.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Baker
- University of LeicesterDepartment of Health Sciences22‐28 Princess Rd WestLeicesterLeicestershireUKLE1 6TP
| | | | - Clare Gillies
- University of LeicesterUniversity Division of Medicine for the ElderlyThe Glenfield HospitalGroby RoadLeicesterUKLE5 4PW
| | - Elizabeth J Shaw
- National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)Level 1A, City PlazaPiccadilly PlazaManchesterUKM1 4BD
| | - Francine Cheater
- School of Health Sciences, University of East AngliaEdith Cavell BuildingNorwichNorfolkUK
| | - Signe Flottorp
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health ServicesBox 7004, St. Olavs plassOsloNorway0130
| | - Noelle Robertson
- Leicester UniversitySchool of Psychology (Clinical Section)104 Regent RoadLeicesterLeicestershireUKLE1 7LT
| | - Michel Wensing
- Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud Institute for Health SciencesPO Box 9101117 KWAZONijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
| | | | - Martin P Eccles
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health and SocietyBadiley Clark BuildingRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Maciek Godycki‐Cwirko
- Medical University of LodzCentre for Family and Community MedicineKopcindkiego 20LodzPoland90‐153
| | - Jan van Lieshout
- Radboud University Medical CenterScientific Institute for Quality of HealthcareP.O.Box 9101NijmegenNetherlands6500 HB
| | - Cornelia Jäger
- University Hospital of HeidelbergDepartment of General Practice and Health Services ResearchVoßstr. 2, Geb. 37HeidelbergGermany69115
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Jarrett C, Wilson R, O'Leary M, Eckersberger E, Larson HJ. Strategies for addressing vaccine hesitancy - A systematic review. Vaccine 2015; 33:4180-90. [PMID: 25896377 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 607] [Impact Index Per Article: 67.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED The purpose of this systematic review is to identify, describe and assess the potential effectiveness of strategies to respond to issues of vaccine hesitancy that have been implemented and evaluated across diverse global contexts. METHODS A systematic review of peer reviewed (January 2007-October 2013) and grey literature (up to October 2013) was conducted using a broad search strategy, built to capture multiple dimensions of public trust, confidence and hesitancy concerning vaccines. This search strategy was applied and adapted across several databases and organizational websites. Descriptive analyses were undertaken for 166 (peer reviewed) and 15 (grey literature) evaluation studies. In addition, the quality of evidence relating to a series of PICO (population, intervention, comparison/control, outcomes) questions defined by the SAGE Working Group on Vaccine Hesitancy (WG) was assessed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria; data were analyzed using Review Manager. RESULTS Across the literature, few strategies to address vaccine hesitancy were found to have been evaluated for impact on either vaccination uptake and/or changes in knowledge, awareness or attitude (only 14% of peer reviewed and 25% of grey literature). The majority of evaluation studies were based in the Americas and primarily focused on influenza, human papillomavirus (HPV) and childhood vaccines. In low- and middle-income regions, the focus was on diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis, and polio. Across all regions, most interventions were multi-component and the majority of strategies focused on raising knowledge and awareness. Thirteen relevant studies were used for the GRADE assessment that indicated evidence of moderate quality for the use of social mobilization, mass media, communication tool-based training for health-care workers, non-financial incentives and reminder/recall-based interventions. Overall, our results showed that multicomponent and dialogue-based interventions were most effective. However, given the complexity of vaccine hesitancy and the limited evidence available on how it can be addressed, identified strategies should be carefully tailored according to the target population, their reasons for hesitancy, and the specific context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caitlin Jarrett
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rose Wilson
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Maureen O'Leary
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elisabeth Eckersberger
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Heidi J Larson
- Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
| | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Godoy P, Castilla J, Mayoral JM, Martín V, Astray J, Torner N, Toledo D, Soldevila N, González-Candelas F, García S, Diaz-Borrego J, Tamames S, Domínguez A. Influenza vaccination of primary healthcare physicians may be associated with vaccination in their patients: a vaccination coverage study. BMC FAMILY PRACTICE 2015; 16:44. [PMID: 25880501 PMCID: PMC4389995 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-015-0259-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2014] [Accepted: 03/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Background To assess the contribution of physician-related factors, especially their influenza vaccine status, in the vaccination coverage of their patients. Methods A study of vaccination coverage was carried out in Spain in 2011–12. The dependent variable (vaccination coverage in patients aged ≥65 years) was obtained from regional records. Information was gathered on the vaccination of physicians through an anonymous web survey. We compared the vaccination coverage of patients with the vaccination of their physicians using the Student t test. Associations were determined using a multilevel regression model. Results The coverage in patients aged ≥ 65 years was 56.3% and was higher (57.3%) in patients whose physician had been vaccinated than in those whose physician had not (55.2%) (p = 0.008). In the multilevel regression model, vaccination of the physician was associated (p = 0.049) with vaccination of their patients after controlling for the effects of age (p = 0.046), region (p = 0.089), and opinions on the effectiveness of the vaccine (p = 0.013). Conclusions Vaccination of physicians together with their opinions on the effectiveness of the vaccine may be a predictor of vaccination coverage in their patients. Further studies are required to confirm this. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12875-015-0259-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pere Godoy
- Agencia de Salud Pública de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain. .,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Lleida, Universidad de Lleida (IRBLleida), Lleida, Spain.
| | - Jesús Castilla
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
| | | | - Vicente Martín
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Instituto de Biomedicina, Universidad de León, León, Spain.
| | - Jenaro Astray
- Área de Epidemiología, Comunidad de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Núria Torner
- Agencia de Salud Pública de Cataluña, Barcelona, Spain. .,CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Diana Toledo
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain. .,Servicio de Epidemiología, Agencia de Salud Pública de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Núria Soldevila
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Fernando González-Candelas
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Pública, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Susana García
- Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo, Guipúzcoa, Spain.
| | | | - Sonia Tamames
- Dirección General de Salud Pública, Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación, Junta de Castilla y León, León, Spain.
| | - Angela Domínguez
- CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain. .,Departamento de Salud Pública, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sociocognitive predictors of the intention of healthcare workers to receive the influenza vaccine in Belgian, Dutch and German hospital settings. J Hosp Infect 2014; 89:202-9. [PMID: 25586987 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2014] [Accepted: 11/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination of healthcare workers (HCWs) is recommended to prevent the transmission of influenza to vulnerable patients. Nevertheless, vaccination coverage rates of HCWs in European countries have been low. AIM To investigate the relative and combined strength of sociocognitive variables, from past research, theory and a qualitative study, in explaining the motivation of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine. METHODS An anonymous, online questionnaire was distributed among HCWs in hospital settings in Belgium, Germany and the Netherlands between February and April 2013. FINDINGS Attitude and past vaccination uptake explained a considerable amount of variance in the intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine. Moreover, low perceived social norms, omission bias, low moral norms, being older, having no patient contact, and being Belgian or Dutch (compared with German) increased the probability of having no intention to receive the influenza vaccine compared with being undecided about vaccination. High intention to receive the influenza vaccine was shown to be more likely than being undecided about vaccination when HCWs had high perceived susceptibility of contracting influenza, low naturalistic views, and lower motivation to receive the vaccine solely for self-protection. CONCLUSION Country-specific interventions and a focus on different sociocognitive variables depending on the intention/lack of intention of HCWs to receive the influenza vaccine may be beneficial to promote vaccination uptake.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lehmann BA, Ruiter RAC, Chapman G, Kok G. The intention to get vaccinated against influenza and actual vaccination uptake of Dutch healthcare personnel. Vaccine 2014; 32:6986-6991. [PMID: 25454867 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2014] [Revised: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 10/14/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Health Authorities recommend annual vaccination of healthcare personnel (HCP) against influenza to protect vulnerable patients. Nevertheless, vaccination rates have been low among European HCP. Here we report on a longitudinal survey study to identify social cognitive predictors of the motivation to obtain influenza vaccination, and to test whether intention is a good predictor of actual vaccination behaviour. Dutch HCP (N=1370) were invited to participate in a survey (baseline). To link intention to behaviour, participants who completed the first survey (N=556) were sent a second survey after vaccinations were offered (follow-up). Multinominal regression analysis showed that HCP with a positive attitude and a higher frequency of past vaccinations were more likely to have a high intention to get vaccinated. A negative attitude, high feelings of autonomy in the decision whether to get vaccinated, a preference of inaction over vaccination, a lesser sense of personal responsibility, and high self-protection motives increased the probability of no intention to get vaccinated. Social cognitive predictors were identified that explain the intention to get vaccinated against influenza of HCP, which in turn proved to be a good predictor of behaviour. Future interventions should focus on these variables to increase vaccination coverage rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Birthe A Lehmann
- Department of Work & Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Robert A C Ruiter
- Department of Work & Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Gretchen Chapman
- Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, 152 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, United States.
| | - Gerjo Kok
- Department of Work & Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
van der Sande MA, Meijer A, Sen-Kerpiclik F, Enserink R, Cools HJ, Overduin P, Ferreira JM, Veldman-Ariessen MJ. Effectiveness of post-exposition prophylaxis with oseltamivir in nursing homes: a randomised controlled trial over four seasons. Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2014; 11:13. [PMID: 25210532 PMCID: PMC4159638 DOI: 10.1186/1742-7622-11-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2014] [Accepted: 08/20/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Oseltamivir has been registered for use as post-exposition prophylaxis (PEP) following exposure to influenza, based on studies among healthy adults. Effectiveness among frail elderly nursing home populations still needs to be properly assessed. Methods We conducted a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of PEP with either oseltamivir (75 mg once daily) or placebo among nursing home units where influenza virus was detected; analysis was unblinded. The primary outcome was laboratory-confirmed influenza among residents in units on PEP; the secondary outcome was clinical diagnosis of influenza-like illness (ILI). Results 42 nursing homes were recruited, in which 17 outbreaks occurred from 2009 through 2013, two caused by influenza virus B, the others caused by influenza virus A(H3N2). Randomisation was successful in 15 outbreaks, with a few chance differences in baseline indicators. Six outbreaks were assigned to oseltamivir and nine to placebo. Influenza virus positive secondary ILI cases were detected in 2/6 and 2/9 units respectively (ns); secondary ILI cases occurred in 2/6 units on oseltamivir, and 5/9 units on placebo (ns). Logistical challenges in ensuring timely administration were considerable. Conclusion We did not find statistical evidence that PEP with oseltamivir given to nursing home residents in routine operational settings exposed to influenza reduced the risk of new influenza infections within a unit nor that of developing ILI. Power however was limited due to far fewer outbreaks in nursing homes than expected since the 2009 pandemic. (RCT nr NL92738)
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Ab van der Sande
- Centre Infectious Disease Control, RIVM, PO Box 1-pb75, 3720BA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands ; Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Adam Meijer
- Centre Infectious Disease Control, RIVM, PO Box 1-pb75, 3720BA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Fatmagül Sen-Kerpiclik
- Centre Infectious Disease Control, RIVM, PO Box 1-pb75, 3720BA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Remko Enserink
- Centre Infectious Disease Control, RIVM, PO Box 1-pb75, 3720BA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands ; Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, UMC Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Herman Jm Cools
- Department Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Piet Overduin
- Centre Infectious Disease Control, RIVM, PO Box 1-pb75, 3720BA, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Wicker S, Marckmann G. Vaccination of health care workers against influenza: Is it time to think about a mandatory policy in Europe? Vaccine 2014; 32:4844-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2013] [Revised: 08/25/2013] [Accepted: 09/26/2013] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
35
|
Influenza vaccination among health care personnel in California: 2010-2011 influenza season. Am J Infect Control 2013; 41:e65-71. [PMID: 23394860 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2012] [Revised: 10/12/2012] [Accepted: 10/15/2012] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza vaccination among health care personnel (HCP) is a key measure to prevent influenza infection and transmission in health care settings. This study described influenza vaccination coverage among employees in various health care settings in California and examined factors associated with HCP influenza vaccination. METHODS This study analyzed data from 111 facilities recruited through statewide invitation. Data on facility characteristics, vaccination programs, and vaccination receipt within and outside facilities were collected using Web-based questionnaires. Employees were defined as all persons in the facility payroll system regardless of patient contact. Facility-level employee vaccination coverage was calculated for 91 facilities. RESULTS The mean employee influenza vaccination coverage was 60.7% overall: 64.0% for acute care hospitals (n = 30), 54.7% for long-term care facilities (n = 22), 59.4% for ambulatory surgery centers (n = 8), 58.6% for dialysis centers (n = 25), and 77.2% for physician practices (n = 6). Vaccination promotion methods such as risk-benefit education, personal reminders, and vaccination data tracking and feedback were significantly associated with increased vaccination coverage. CONCLUSION The study findings suggest some variations in HCP vaccination coverage by type of health care setting as well as substantial challenges in reaching the Healthy People 2020 goal of 90%. Health care facilities need to use comprehensive promotion methods to improve HCP influenza vaccinations.
Collapse
|
36
|
Riphagen-Dalhuisen J, Frijstein G, van der Geest-Blankert N, Danhof-Pont M, de Jager H, Bos N, Smeets E, de Vries M, Gallee P, Hak E. Planning and process evaluation of a multi-faceted influenza vaccination implementation strategy for health care workers in acute health care settings. BMC Infect Dis 2013; 13:235. [PMID: 23701921 PMCID: PMC3680164 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2012] [Accepted: 05/10/2013] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Influenza transmitted by health care workers (HCWs) is a potential threat to frail patients in acute health care settings. Therefore, immunizing HCWs against influenza should receive high priority. Despite recommendations of the World Health Organization, vaccine coverage of HCWs remains low in all European countries. This study explores the use of intervention strategies and methods to improve influenza vaccination rates among HCWs in an acute care setting. METHODS The Intervention Mapping (IM) method was used to systematically develop and implement an intervention strategy aimed at changing influenza vaccination behaviour among HCWs in Dutch University Medical Centres (UMCs). Carried out during the influenza seasons 2009/2010 and 2010/2011, the interventions were then qualitatively and quantitatively evaluated by way of feedback from participating UMCs and the completion of a web-based staff questionnaire in the following spring of each season. RESULTS The IM method resulted in the development of a transparent influenza vaccination intervention implementation strategy. The intervention strategy was offered to six Dutch UMCs in a randomized in a clustered Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), where three UMCs were chosen for intervention, and three UMCs acted as controls. A further two UMCs elected to have the intervention. The qualitative process evaluation showed that HCWs at four of the five intervention UMCs were responsive to the majority of the 11 relevant behavioural determinants resulting from the needs assessment in their intervention strategy compared with only one of three control UMCs. The quantitative evaluation among a sample of HCWs revealed that of all the developed communication materials, HCWs reported the posters as the most noticeable. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that it is possible to develop a structured implementation strategy for increasing the rate of influenza vaccination by HCWs in acute health care settings. The evaluation also showed that it is impossible to expose all HCWs to all intervention methods (which would have been the best case scenario). Further study is needed to (1) improve HCW exposure to intervention methods; (2) determine the effect of such interventions on vaccine uptake among HCWs; and (3) assess the impact on clinical outcomes among patients when such interventions are enacted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josien Riphagen-Dalhuisen
- Department of PharmacoEpidemiology & PharmacoEconomics, University Centre of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, A. Deusinglaan 1, P.O. Box XB45, Groningen 9713 AV, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schmidt S, Saulle R, Di Thiene D, Boccia A, La Torre G. Do the quality of the trials and the year of publication affect the efficacy of intervention to improve seasonal influenza vaccination among healthcare workers?: Results of a systematic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2013; 9:349-61. [PMID: 23291943 DOI: 10.4161/hv.22736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite longstanding recommendations by public-health authorities vaccination coverage in health care workers worldwide are poor. The aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the trials conducted to increase seasonal influenza vaccination rates among health care workers. RESULTS Ten articles met the pre-determined criteria. For all article the score calculation was performed. DISCUSSION The combination of an educational and a promotional element appared the most effective in augmenting the influenza vaccination coverage among health care workers. But some cases, the intervention did not contribute to increasing the vaccination rates among health care workers. In any case, the quality of controlled trials plays an important role in the results obtained by carrying out a specific intervention and contributed to obtaining this debatable results. MATERIALS AND METHODS Research was conducted using Scopus and PubMed database. We selected all clinical trials to perform the meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Schmidt
- Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases; Sapienza University of Rome; Rome, Italy; 2 University of Amsterdam; Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Macdonald L, Cairns G, Angus K, de Andrade M. Promotional communications for influenza vaccination: a systematic review. JOURNAL OF HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2013; 18:1523-1549. [PMID: 24298886 DOI: 10.1080/10810730.2013.840697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The authors conducted a systematic review that aimed to map current practice and identify effective practice in promotional communications for seasonal influenza vaccination in Europe. They identified 22 studies from 7 European countries. Included studies were primarily outcome evaluations of communications promoting vaccination to health care workers and elderly adults. Evidence on communications to improve public acceptance was sparse. A range of communication approaches, methods, materials, and channels were used, frequently in combination. All forms of promotional communications have the potential to increase uptake in health care workers and can also improve uptake among patients. There was promising evidence that mass communication methods, delivered as standalone activities or as one component of a communication mix, can improve uptake in target populations. Education for health care workers and improved service delivery are common adjuncts to promotional communications that were associated with effectiveness. The evidence suggests that personalized communications, combined with improved service delivery, might boost rates of uptake among elderly adults. Future development of good practice could be enhanced by more systematic, theory-based intervention design and more detailed reporting of process and outcome evaluations. Vaccine hesitancy is increasingly prevalent; more policy and research to improve public acceptance should therefore be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Macdonald
- a Institute for Social Marketing, Stirling Management School, University of Stirling , Stirling , Scotland, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kok G, van Essen GA, Wicker S, Llupià A, Mena G, Correia R, Ruiter RAC. Planning for influenza vaccination in health care workers: an Intervention Mapping approach. Vaccine 2011; 29:8512-9. [PMID: 21939722 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2011] [Revised: 08/26/2011] [Accepted: 09/06/2011] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Influenza vaccination uptake by health care workers (HCWs) decreases the transmission of influenza to vulnerable patients and prevents influenza-related absenteeism. Vaccination is effective, easy, and generally without serious side-effects. However, vaccination rates of HCWs are too low. This paper's objective is to apply Intervention Mapping (IM), a planning process for the systematic theory- and evidence-based development of health promotion interventions, to the development of voluntary educational interventions to promote influenza vaccination in HCWs. IM consists of the following six steps: needs assessment, program objectives, methods and applications, program development, planning for program implementation, and planning for program evaluation. Examples are provided to illustrate the activities associated with these steps. It is concluded that applying IM in the (influenza) vaccination field may help the development of effective behavior change interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerjo Kok
- Work & Social Psychology, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Looijmans-van den Akker I, Hulscher ME, Verheij TJ, Riphagen-Dalhuisen J, van Delden JJ, Hak E. How to develop a program to increase influenza vaccine uptake among workers in health care settings? Implement Sci 2011; 6:47. [PMID: 21595877 PMCID: PMC3115899 DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2010] [Accepted: 05/19/2011] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Apart from direct protection and reduced productivity loss during epidemics, the main reason to immunize healthcare workers (HCWs) against influenza is to provide indirect protection of frail patients through reduced transmission in healthcare settings. Because the vaccine uptake among HCWs remains far below the health objectives, systematic programs are needed to take full advantage of such vaccination. In an earlier report, we showed a mean 9% increase of vaccine uptake among HCWs in nursing homes that implemented a systematic program compared with control homes, with higher rates in those homes that implemented more program elements. Here, we report in detail the process of the development of the implementation program to enable researchers and practitioners to develop intervention programs tailored to their setting. Methods We applied the intervention mapping (IM) method to develop a theory- and evidence-based intervention program to change vaccination behaviour among HCWs in nursing homes. Results After a comprehensive needs assessment, we were able to specify proximal program objectives and selected methods and strategies for inducing behavioural change. By consensus, we decided on planning of three main program components, i.e., an outreach visit to all nursing homes, plenary information meetings, and the appointment of a program coordinator -- preferably a physician -- in each home. Finally, we planned program adoption, implementation, and evaluation. Conclusion The IM methodology resulted in a systematic, comprehensive, and transparent procedure of program development. A potentially effective intervention program to change influenza vaccination behaviour among HCWs was developed, and its impact was assessed in a clustered randomised controlled trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingrid Looijmans-van den Akker
- University of Groningen, Department of Pharmacy, Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomy, A, Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|