Revisiting differences between atopic and non-atopic asthmatics: When age is shaping airway inflammatory profile

Altered COVID-19 immunity in children with asthma by atopic status

Background

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection causes a spectrum of clinical outcomes that may be complicated by severe asthma. Antiviral immunity is often compromised in patients with asthma; however, whether this is true for SARS-CoV-2 immunity and children is unknown.

Objective

We aimed to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 immunity in children with asthma on the basis of infection or vaccination history and compared to respiratory syncytial viral or allergen (eg, cockroach, dust mite)-specific immunity.

Methods

Fifty-three children from an urban asthma study were evaluated for medical history, lung function, and virus- or allergen-specific immunity using antibody or T-cell assays.

Results

Polyclonal antibody responses to spike were observed in most children from infection and/or vaccination history. Children with atopic asthma or high allergen-specific IgE, particularly to dust mites, exhibited reduced seroconversion, antibody magnitude, and SARS-CoV-2 virus neutralization after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination. TH1 responses to SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory syncytial virus correlated with antigen-respective IgG. Cockroach-specific T-cell activation as well as IL-17A and IL-21 cytokines negatively correlated with SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and effector functions, distinct from total and dust mite IgE. Allergen-specific IgE and lack of vaccination were associated with recent health care utilization. Reduced lung function (forced expiratory volume in 1 second ≤ 80%) was independently associated with (SARS-CoV-2) peptide-induced cytokines, including IL-31, whereas poor asthma control was associated with cockroach-specific cytokine responses.

Conclusion

Mechanisms underpinning atopic and nonatopic asthma may complicate the development of memory to SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination and lead to a higher risk of repeated infection in these children.

A cross-sectional observational study of birefringent particulates in bronchoalveolar lavage cytology in horses with equine asthma from the West v East coasts of the USA

Equine asthma (EA) is an important cause of wastage in the USA horse industry. Exposure to organic particulates, from stable dust, airborne pollen, and fungal loads, is posited to be the main cause. Dust arising from the earth's crust has been largely ignored as a contributor to EA in the veterinary literature. The objectives of this study were to investigate the occurrence of birefringent particulates in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of horses with a clinical complaint of EA residing in the arid West of the USA v. the East, in an effort to determine the contribution of geolocation to geogenic dust exposure. We analyzed BALF cytology and historical data sent to our referral clinical laboratory from 148 horses from the West Coast and 233 horses from the East Coast of the USA over a 6-year period, using light microscopy to determine cell proportions and other visible elements as well as a polarizing lens to detect birefringent material. Univariate analysis showed that horses from the West coast were significantly more likely to have birefringent particulates in the BALF than horses from the East coast (40.5% v. 8.6%, p < 0.001); while horses from the East had higher BALF neutrophil proportions. Horses from the West also had lower proportions of neutrophils in the BALF than those from the East (27.1 v. 10.9, p < .001). Using historical and BAL data in a forward stepwise binary logistic regression model with presence of birefringent particulates found within alveolar macrophages as the outcome, geographical location in the West retained significance as a predictor (OR 8.0, CI [4.3-14.8], p< .001). While the birefringent particulates cannot be identified on the basis of polarizing microscopy alone, this study provides evidence that horses from the West are exposed to inorganic particulates that may contribute to signs of equine asthma.

Evidence for 2 clusters among patients with noneosinophilic asthma

BACKGROUND

Although asthma is often seen as an eosinophilic disease associated with atopy, patients with noneosinophilic asthma represent a substantial part of the population with asthma.

OBJECTIVE

To apply an unsupervised clustering method in a cohort of 588 patients with noneosinophilic asthma (sputum eosinophils < 3%) recruited from an asthma clinic of a secondary care center.

METHODS

Our cluster analysis of the whole cohort identified 2 subgroups as cluster 1 (n = 417) and cluster 2 (n = 171).

RESULTS

Cluster 1 comprised a predominantly female group with late disease onset, a low proportion of atopy (24%), and a substantial smoking history (53%). In this cluster, treatment burden was low (<50% of inhaled corticosteroid users); asthma control and quality of life were poor, with median Asthma Control Test, Asthma Control Questionnaire, and Asthma Quality of Life scores of 16, 1.7, and 4.5, respectively, whereas lung function was preserved with a median postbronchodilation forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 93% predicted. Cluster 2 was a predominantly male group, almost exclusively comprising patients with atopy (99%) with early disease onset and a moderate treatment burden (median inhaled corticosteroids dose 800 µg/d equivalent beclomethasone). In cluster 2, asthma was partially controlled, with median Asthma Control Test and Asthma Control Questionnaire scores reaching 18 and 1.3, respectively, and lung function well preserved with a median postbronchodilation of 95% predicted. Although systemic and airway neutrophilic inflammation was the dominant pattern in cluster 1, cluster 2 essentially comprised paucigranulocytic asthma with moderately elevated fraction exhaled nitric oxide.

CONCLUSION

Noneosinophilic asthma splits into 2 clusters distinguishing by disease onset, atopic status, smoking history, systemic and airway inflammation, and disease control and quality of life.

When sequential use of mepolizumab and dupilumab in a severe atopic eosinophilic asthmatic questions the role of eosinophils in mediating the clinical expression of the disease: a case report

BACKGROUND

The advent of biologics has resulted in major progress in the treatment of severe T2 high asthmatics. There are currently several classes of biologics approved for severe asthma including anti-immunoglobulin E, anti-interleukin-5/interleukin 5R, anti-interleukin 4/interleukin 13R, and anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin.

CASE PRESENTATIONS

Here we report the case of a 55-year-old Caucasian man with severe eosinophilic atopic asthma, who sequentially benefited from a treatment with mepolizumab, an anti-interleukin-5 monoclonal antibody, followed by treatment with dupilumab, an anti-interleukin-4/interleukin-13R antibody, the switch being justified by a flare-up of dermatitis while on mepolizumab. Overall, the patient has been followed for 72 months, including 42 months on mepolizumab and 30 months on dupilumab. Close monitoring of exacerbations, asthma control, lung function, asthma quality of life, and biomarkers shows that both biologics reduced asthma exacerbation and provided an improvement in asthma control and quality of life, with the patient achieving remission after 30 months on dupilumab. However, the effects of the two biologics on the biomarkers were very different, with mepolizumab controlling eosinophilic inflammation and dupilumab reducing serum immunoglobulin E and fractional exhaled nitric oxide levels.

CONCLUSION

The originality of this case resides in the description of clinical status and biomarker evolution after a sequential use of mepolizumab and dupilumab in a severe atopic eosinophilic asthmatic. It shows that mepolizumab reduces exacerbation and improves asthma control by curbing eosinophilic inflammation whereas dupilumab provides asthma remission without controlling airway eosinophilic inflammation.

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide-a possible biomarker for risk of obstructive sleep apnea in snorers

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Airway inflammation in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been described and can be assessed by measuring the biomarker fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). In this pilot study, we investigated FeNO measurements in identification of OSA among persons with snoring.

METHODS

In this study we aimed to investigate (1) if FeNO could be used in screening for OSA, (2) if daytime sleepiness correlated to FeNO levels, and (3) whether asthma affected FeNO levels. Persons with snoring were prospectively included in three primary care ear, nose, and throat clinics. Patients underwent spirometry, FeNO tests, and partial polygraphy. They filled out questionnaires on sinonasal and asthma symptoms, daytime sleepiness, and quality of life. Current smokers, patients with upper airway inflammatory conditions, and patients treated with steroids were excluded.

RESULTS

Forty-nine individuals were included. Median apnea-hypopnea index was 11.4, mean age was 50.9 years, and 29% were females. OSA was diagnosed in 73% of the patients of whom 53% had moderate-severe disease. Patients with moderate-severe OSA had significantly higher FeNO counts than patients with no or mild OSA (P = .024). Patients younger than 50 years with a FeNO below 15 had the lowest prevalence of moderate-severe OSA. No correlation was found between FeNO measurements and daytime sleepiness, and asthma did not affect FeNO levels.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a low prevalence of moderate-severe OSA in persons with snoring when FeNO and age were low. This might be considered in a future screening model, though further studies testing the FeNO cutoff level and the diagnostic accuracy are warranted.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: NO Measurements in Screening for Asthma and OSA, in Patients With Severe Snoring; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03964324; Identifier: NCT03964324.

CITATION

Kiaer E, Ravn A, Jennum P, et al. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide-a possible biomarker for risk of obstructive sleep apnea in snorers. J Clin Sleep Med. 2024;20(1):85-92.