1
|
Schröter P, Lau HH, Stritzke F, Franke H, Weusthof K, Regnery S, Bauer L, Deng M, Dvornikovich K, Hofmann A, Wessel L, Semmelmayer K, Moratin J, Ristow O, Hoffmann J, Plinkert P, Dyckhoff G, Debus J, Held T. Combined Spatial and Dosimetric Recurrence Pattern Analysis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following Postoperative (Chemo)radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 2025; 20:63. [PMID: 40269897 PMCID: PMC12020044 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-025-02641-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/11/2025] [Indexed: 04/25/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advancements in nodal staging for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have prompted radiotherapy de-escalation trials to reduce irradiation of electively treated neck regions, with the goal of improving treatment tolerability. While volumetric de-escalation has shown promise in definitive radiotherapy of HNSCC, limited data exist regarding its safety in the postoperative treatment setting. This study aimed to assess dose-level-specific locoregional recurrence patterns following standard postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy in a mixed HNSCC cohort to inform risk-adaptive radiotherapy strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed 203 HNSCC patients (75% HPV-negative, 25% HPV-positive) treated with curative intent postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy from 2017 to 2021. Recurrence imaging was co-registered with planning CT, and recurrent tumor volumes were dosimetrically compared to the target volume dose and spatially analyzed using a center-of-mass-based approach. We classified five recurrence types: A (central high-dose), B (peripheral high-dose), C (central intermediate- or low-dose), D (peripheral intermediate- or low-dose), and E (extraneous dose). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 39.7 months, the three-year local, regional, and distant control of HPV-negative HNSCC were 84%, 87%, and 87%, respectively. Of 56 recurrences, 17 were local, 13 regional, 3 locoregional, 9 combined local/regional with concomitant distant failure, and 14 distant only. Of 40 analyzed recurrences, we identified 47.5% as type A/B, 5% as type C/D intermediate-dose, and 20% as type E, half of which were secondary cancers. Among the 27.5% (11/40) type C/D low-dose recurrences in the elective target volume, 15% (6/40) were true nodal failures, resulting in an overall elective neck failure rate of 3% (6/203). CONCLUSION The predominance of high-dose recurrences suggests that biological tumor resistance is a key driver of treatment failure, highlighting the necessity to refine postoperative risk stratification and integrate tumor biology into dose escalation decisions. The low incidence of isolated nodal recurrences in electively treated neck regions supports the feasibility of volumetric de-escalation of postoperative radiotherapy. This approach might not only be feasible for HPV-associated oropharyngeal cancers but also for HPV-negative tumors, provided that accurate nodal staging has been conducted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schröter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Hoi Hin Lau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Florian Stritzke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Henrik Franke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Weusthof
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Regnery
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Bauer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Deng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Katharina Dvornikovich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Anna Hofmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Wessel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karl Semmelmayer
- Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julius Moratin
- Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Ristow
- Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Oral and Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Plinkert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Dyckhoff
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Held
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Tumor diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niazi M, Miller R, Kolb R, Ji W, Lozano A, Ahrens M, Hanlon A, Pickles M, Song A, Bar-Ad V, Hockstein N, Park SJ, Raben A, Shukla G. Association Between Time From Surgery to Radiation Therapy and Multimodality Treatment Outcomes in HPV+ Head and Neck Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Experience. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101515. [PMID: 38993193 PMCID: PMC11233867 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 07/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Oropharyngeal squamous cell cancers (OPSCCs) are traditionally managed with surgery and, if indicated, adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy. NCCN recommends keeping the time from surgery to the start of RT (TSRT) within 6 weeks to avoid possibly compromising patient outcomes. HPV+ OPSCCs behave more favorably than HPV- OPSCCs. We hypothesized that TSRT beyond 6 weeks may not portend poorer outcomes for the former. Methods We identified nonmetastatic, high-risk HPV+ OPSCCs treated with multimodal therapy at 2 institutions. Prolonged TSRT was defined as >6 weeks and was evaluated for association with recurrence-free survival (RFS). Radiation treatment time (RTT; time from the first to the last day of RT), total treatment package time (TTPT; time from surgery to the end of adjuvant treatments), de-escalated RT (dose ≤56 Gy), concurrent chemotherapy, smoking history, and treatment institution were evaluated as possible confounders. Results In total, 96 patients were included. The median follow-up time was 62 months (4-123 months); 69 patients underwent transoral robotic surgeries, and 27 received open surgeries. The median postoperative RT dose was 60 Gy (50-70.8 Gy). The median TSRT, RTT, and TTPT were 38 days (11-208), 43 days (26-56 days), and 81 days (40-255 days), respectively. Ten patients failed treatment at a median of 8 months (4-64 months). Two locoregional and 4 distant failures occurred in the group without prolonged TSRT, whereas 2 locoregional and 2 distant failures were recorded in the prolonged TSRT group. Prolonged TTPT, de-escalated RT, chemotherapy, smoking history, and treatment institution were not associated with treatment failure. RTT was dropped from our analyses as no events appeared in the prolonged RTT group, and no reliable hazard ratio could be computed. Conclusions TSRT > 6 weeks was not significantly associated with inferior outcomes in the postoperative management of HPV+ OPSCCs. Longer TSRT may facilitate better recovery from surgical toxicity, as needed, without compromising oncologic outcomes. The TSRT goal for these cancers should be investigated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muneeb Niazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryan Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ryann Kolb
- Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Wenyan Ji
- Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Alicia Lozano
- Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Monica Ahrens
- Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Alexandra Hanlon
- Center for Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Virginia Tech, Roanoke, Virginia
| | - Max Pickles
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen F Graham Cancer Center, ChristianaCare Health System, Newark, Delaware
| | - Andrew Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Voichita Bar-Ad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Neil Hockstein
- ENT & Allergy of Delaware, ChristianaCare Health System, Newark, Delaware
| | - Su Jung Park
- Medical Oncology Hematology Consultants, Newark, Delaware
| | - Adam Raben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen F Graham Cancer Center, ChristianaCare Health System, Newark, Delaware
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Helen F Graham Cancer Center, ChristianaCare Health System, Newark, Delaware
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Petery T, Frankart AJ, Esslinger H, Wu X, Rai SN, Takiar V. The effect of treatment package time on locally advanced oral cavity cancer outcomes. Oral Oncol 2024; 154:106870. [PMID: 38823171 DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2024.106870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) To assess the influence of treatment package time (TPT) on overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) in oral cavity cancer (OCC) patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy (CHT). MATERIALS/METHODS 354 adult OCC patients treated at a single, high-volume center between 2012-2022 with various pathologic risk features were included. TPT was defined as days from surgery to RT completion. Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank p-values, univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the impact of TPT on OS and EFS, and the optimal TPT cutoff. RESULTS The optimal TPT cutoff was 105 days. TPT < 105 days was significantly associated with improved OS and EFS (p = 0.002 and p = 0.027, respectively) compared to TPT ≥ 105 days. On UVA, factors significantly associated with OS were TPT < 105 days, former/current smoker status, pathologic stage IV, positive perineural invasion (PNI), and extranodal extension (ENE) (all p < 0.05). On MVA for OS, TPT < 105 days, former/current smoker status, pathologic stage IV, and positive PNI (all p < 0.05) remained significant. Factors significantly associated with EFS on UVA were TPT < 105 days, former/current smoker status, pathologic stage IV, positive PNI or ENE, and concurrent CHT (all p < 0.05). On MVA, TPT < 105 days, pathologic stage IV, and positive PNI (all p < 0.05) remained significant. CONCLUSIONS In a large, homogenous cohort of OCCs, optimal TPT was <105 days, with TPT ≥ 105 days significantly associated with worse OS and EFS. Multidisciplinary coordination should analyze factors potentially contributing to treatment delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taylor Petery
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Andrew J Frankart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Hope Esslinger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Xiaoyong Wu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics & Cancer Data Science Center, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Shesh N Rai
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics & Cancer Data Science Center, Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resources, University of Cincinnati Cancer Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Vinita Takiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA; Cincinnati VA Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Duckett KA, Kassir MF, Nguyen SA, Brennan EA, Chera BS, Sterba KR, Hughes Halbert C, Hill EG, McCay J, Puram SV, Sandulache VC, Kahmke R, Ramadan S, Nussenbaum B, Alberg AJ, Graboyes EM. Delays Starting Postoperative Radiotherapy Among Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 170:320-334. [PMID: 37731255 PMCID: PMC10840985 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/02/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Initiating postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) within 6 weeks (42 days) of surgery is the first and only Commission on Cancer (CoC) approved quality metric for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). No study has systematically reviewed nor synthesized the literature to establish national benchmarks for delays in starting PORT. DATA SOURCES Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and CINAHL. REVIEW METHODS Studies that described time-to-PORT or PORT delays in patients with HNSCC treated in the United States after 2003 were included. Meta-analysis of proportions and continuous measures was performed on nonoverlapping datasets to examine the pooled frequency of PORT delays and time-to-PORT. RESULTS Thirty-six studies were included in the systematic review and 14 in the meta-analysis. Most studies utilized single-institution (n = 17; 47.2%) or cancer registry (n = 16; 44.4%) data. Twenty-five studies (69.4%) defined PORT delay as >6 weeks after surgery (the definition utilized by the CoC and National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines), whereas 4 (11.1%) defined PORT delay as a time interval other than >6 weeks, and 7 (19.4%) characterized time-to-PORT without defining delay. Meta-analysis revealed that 48.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41.4-55.9) of patients started PORT > 6 weeks after surgery. Median and mean time-to-PORT were 45.8 (95% CI, 42.4-51.4 days) and 47.4 days (95% CI, 43.4-51.4 days), respectively. CONCLUSION Delays in initiating guideline-adherent PORT occur in approximately half of patients with HNSCC. These meta-analytic data can be used to set national benchmarks and assess progress in reducing delays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey A Duckett
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Mohamed Faisal Kassir
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Shaun A Nguyen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Emily A Brennan
- MUSC Libraries, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Bhishamjit S Chera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hollings Cancer Center, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Katherine R Sterba
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Chanita Hughes Halbert
- Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elizabeth G Hill
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Jessica McCay
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Sidharth V Puram
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Vlad C Sandulache
- Bobby R. Alford Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- ENT Section, Operative CareLine, Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Russel Kahmke
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery and Communication Sciences, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Salma Ramadan
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Brian Nussenbaum
- American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anthony J Alberg
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Evan M Graboyes
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Calabrese L, Tagliabue M, Grammatica A, De Berardinis R, Corso F, Gazzini L, Abousiam M, Fazio E, Mattavelli D, Fontanella W, Giannini L, Bresciani L, Bruschini R, Gandini S, Piazza C, Ansarin M. Compartmental tongue surgery for intermediate-advanced squamous cell carcinoma: A multicentric study. Head Neck 2023; 45:2862-2873. [PMID: 37727894 DOI: 10.1002/hed.27517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 09/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A multicentric study was conducted on technical reproducibility of compartmental tongue surgery (CTS) in advanced tongue cancers (OTSCC) and comparison to standard wide margin surgery (SWMS). METHODS We studied 551 patients with OTSCC treated by CTS and 50 by SWMS. Oncological outcomes were analyzed. A propensity score was performed to compare survival endpoints for the two cohorts. RESULTS In the CTS group, survival and prognosis were significantly associated with positive lymph-nodes, extranodal extension, depth of invasion and involvement of the soft tissue connecting the tongue primary tumor to neck lymph nodes (T-N tract), independently from the center performing the surgery. SWMS versus CTS showed a HR Cause-Specific Survival (CSS) of 3.24 (95% CI: 1.71-6.11; p < 0.001); HR Loco-Regional Recurrence Free Survival (LRRFS) of 2.54 (95% CI: 1.47-4.40; p < 0.001); HR Overall Survival (OS) of 0.11 (95% CI: 0.01-0.77; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Performing the CTS could provide better CSS and LRRFS than SWMS regardless of the center performing the surgery, in advanced OTSSC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Calabrese
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy
| | - Marta Tagliabue
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Alberto Grammatica
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Rita De Berardinis
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Corso
- Department of Mathematics (DMAT), Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
- Centre for Health Data Science (CHDS), Human Techonopole, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Gazzini
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy
| | - Monir Abousiam
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy
| | - Enrico Fazio
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical Private University (PMU), Bolzano, Italy
| | - Davide Mattavelli
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Walter Fontanella
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maxillofacial, and Thyroid Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Giannini
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maxillofacial, and Thyroid Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bresciani
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Maxillofacial, and Thyroid Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Bruschini
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Gandini
- Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Experimental Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cesare Piazza
- Unit of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences, and Public Health, University of Brescia, School of Medicine, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mohssen Ansarin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dang S, Patel T, Lao I, Sridharan SS, Solari MG, Kim S, Duvvuri U, Ferris R, Kubik M. Discharge Disposition After Head and Neck Reconstruction: Effect on Adjuvant Therapy and Outcomes. Laryngoscope 2023; 133:2977-2983. [PMID: 36896866 PMCID: PMC11225595 DOI: 10.1002/lary.30648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Head and neck cancer patients that require major reconstruction often have advanced-stage disease. Discharge disposition of patients can vary and impact time to adjuvant treatment. We sought to examine outcomes in patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNF) compared to those discharged home, including the impact on adjuvant therapy initiation and treatment package time (TPT). METHODS Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with surgical resection and microvascular free flap reconstruction from 2019 to 2022 were included. Retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the impact of disposition on time to radiation (RT) and TPT. RESULTS 230 patients were included, with 165 (71.7%) discharged to home and 65 (28.3%) discharged to SNF. 79.1% of patients were recommended adjuvant therapy. Average time to RT was 59 days for patients discharged to home compared to 70.1 days for patients discharged to SNF. Disposition was an independent risk factor for delays to starting RT (p = 0.03). TPT was 101.7 days for patients discharged to home versus 112.3 days for those who discharged to SNF. Patients discharged to SNF had higher rates of readmission (p < 0.005) compared to patients discharged home in an adjusted multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSIONS Patients discharged to an SNF had significantly delayed time to initiation of adjuvant treatment and higher rates of readmission. Timeliness to adjuvant treatment has recently been established as a quality measure, thus identifying delays to adjuvant treatment initiation should be a priority. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2977-2983, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Dang
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Terral Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Isabella Lao
- University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Shaum S Sridharan
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Mario G Solari
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Seungwon Kim
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Umamaheswar Duvvuri
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Robert Ferris
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| | - Mark Kubik
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McDonald MW, Bates JE, McCall NS, Goyal S, Liu Y, Rudra S, Remick JS, Tian S, El-Deiry MW, Saba NF, Stokes WA, Swinney E. Insurance Authorization and Access to Proton Therapy for Patients With Head and Neck Cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 116:404-412. [PMID: 36889515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.02.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated our institutional experience to assess potential racial inequities in insurance coverage for proton therapy in patients with head and neck (HN) cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS We examined the demographics of 1519 patients with HN cancer seen in consultation at our HN multidisciplinary clinic (HN MDC) and 805 patients for whom a proton insurance authorization was sought (PAS) from January 2020 to June 2022. The prospects for proton therapy insurance authorization were prospectively noted based on each patient's ICD-10 (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision) diagnosis code and their specific insurance plan. Proton-unfavorable (PU) insurance were those plans whose policy describes proton beam therapy as "experimental" or "not medically necessary" for the given diagnosis. RESULTS For patients seen in our HN MDC, Black, Indigenous, and people of color (BIPOC) were significantly more likely to have PU insurance than non-Hispanic White (NHW) patients (24.9% vs 18.4%, P = .005). In multivariable analysis including race, average income of residence ZIP code, and Medicare eligibility age, BIPOC patients had an odds ratio of 1.25 for PU insurance (P = .041). In the PAS cohort, while there was no difference in the percentage of patients receiving insurance approval for proton therapy between NHW and BIPOC populations (88% vs 88.2%, P = .80), for patients with PU insurance, the median time to determination was significantly longer (median, 15.5 days), and the median time to start any radiation of any modality was longer (46 vs 35 days, P = .08). Compared with NHW patients, the median time from consultation to start of radiation therapy was longer for BIPOC patients (37 vs 43 days, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS BIPOC patients were significantly more likely to have insurance plans unfavorable to proton therapy coverage. These PU insurance plans were associated with a longer median time to determination, a lower approval rate for proton therapy, and a longer time to start radiation of any modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark W McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - James E Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Neal S McCall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Subir Goyal
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Yuan Liu
- Biostatistics Shared Resource, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Soumon Rudra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jill S Remick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sibo Tian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Mark W El-Deiry
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nabil F Saba
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - William A Stokes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Erica Swinney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marques O, Brenet E, Gaultier V, Marchand-Crety C. [Postoperative radiotherapy with cetuximab for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients at high risk of recurrence not eligible for cisplatin: A single-center experience and literature review]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:17-22. [PMID: 35853823 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of concurrent cetuximab with postoperative radiotherapy for patients with head and neck cancer has been scarcely discussed in the literature. The main aim of this study was to report clinical outcomes of high-risk head and neck cancer patients treated by postoperative radiotherapy with cetuximab. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2013 and December 2016, all medical records of patients operated for head and neck cancer who underwent postoperative radiochemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Patients who received cisplatin were excluded; only patients who received cetuximab were included in the analysis. RESULTS Among 52 patients with head and neck cancer treated with postoperative radiochemotherapy, 18 patients received cetuximab potentiation due to ineligibility for cisplatin. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were 23 and 19,5 months and 3-year OS and PFS were 30,5% and 25,9%, respectively. There was a 22% treatment discontinuation rate. CONCLUSION In our single-center retrospective analysis, postoperative radiotherapy with cetuximab for patients with high-risk head and neck cancer ineligible for cisplatin showed similar outcomes to the literature data for exclusive postoperative radiotherapy, with a high discontinuation rate. These low-power data support the lack of indication for cetuximab in combination with postoperative radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Marques
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Godinot, Reims, France
| | - E Brenet
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - V Gaultier
- Department of Oncology Care Unit, Hôpital Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - C Marchand-Crety
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Polyclinique Courlancy, Reims, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Muacevic A, Adler JR, Nittala MR, Duggar WN. The Emerging Boon of Information and Communication Technology in Multidisciplinary Cancer Care: A Force Multiplier With a Human Touch. Cureus 2023; 15:e33665. [PMID: 36788838 PMCID: PMC9917828 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.33665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer care (CC) is incredibly complex and requires the coordination of multiple disciplines for optimal outcomes. Historically, this has been accomplished with multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTBs), but the benefits, while perhaps intuitive, have not always been demonstrated with sufficient research robustness and validity. We hypothesize that this difficulty in demonstrating the benefit of MDTBs may be related to a delay in decision-making and operationalizing those decisions. The history and value of MDTBs are presented as well as their weaknesses and limited demonstration of improved outcomes. A major weakness highlighted by the challenges of MDTBs is the concept of total package time (TPT) (rather, the inability to keep it as short as possible); any significant delays in CC for any discipline may have a deleterious impact on any given patient's care outcome. Drawing on our own experience with utilizing information and communication technology (ICT) during an effort to apply accountability theory to improve specifically radiation therapy package time (RTPT), we argue that similar principles will be applicable in the improvement of not only the TPT which relies on multiple disciplines, but other factors of CC as well, such as coordination. Experience with improvement in RTPT is discussed and the underlying theory is demonstrated as a sound methodology to apply beyond RTPT to TPT involving coordination of multiple disciplines and stands to lead to the full realization of the benefits of the multidisciplinary approach. The complexity of cancer means that real solutions to optimal outcomes are also, by nature, complex, but here simple accountability theory is demonstrated that may unlock the next phase of multidisciplinary coordination. In this work, we argue that the benefits of the MDTB format can be fully realized with the addition of ICT, a technological breakthrough in the past two decades, while not forgetting about continued human factors.
Collapse
|
10
|
Deichaite I, Hopper A, Krockenberger L, Sears TJ, Sutton L, Ray X, Sharabi A, Navon A, Sanghvi P, Carter H, Moiseenko V. Germline genetic biomarkers to stratify patients for personalized radiation treatment. J Transl Med 2022; 20:360. [PMID: 35962345 PMCID: PMC9373374 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03561-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Precision medicine incorporating genetic profiling is becoming a standard of care in medical oncology. However, in the field of radiation oncology there is limited use of genetic profiling and the impact of germline genetic biomarkers on radiosensitivity, radioresistance, or patient outcomes after radiation therapy is poorly understood. In HNSCC, the toxicity associated with treatment can cause delays or early cessation which has been associated with worse outcomes. Identifying potential biomarkers which can help predict toxicity, as well as response to treatment, is of significant interest. Methods Patients with HNSCC who received RT and underwent next generation sequencing of somatic tumor samples, transcriptome RNA-seq with matched normal tissue samples were included. Patients were then grouped by propensity towards increased late vs. early toxicity (Group A) and those without (Group B), assessed by CTCAE v5.0. The groups were then analyzed for association of specific germline variants with toxicity and clinical outcomes. Results In this study we analyzed 37 patients for correlation between germline variants and toxicity. We observed that TSC2, HLA-A, TET2, GEN1, NCOR2 and other germline variants were significantly associated with long term toxicities. 34 HNSCC patients treated with curative intent were evaluated for clinical outcomes. Group A had significantly improved overall survival as well as improved rates of locoregional recurrence and metastatic disease. Specific variants associated with improved clinical outcomes included TSC2, FANCD2, and PPP1R15A, while the HLA-A and GEN1 variants were not correlated with survival or recurrence. A group of five HLA-DMA/HLA-DMB variants was only found in Group B and was associated with a higher risk of locoregional recurrence. Conclusions This study indicates that germline genetic biomarkers may have utility in predicting toxicity and outcomes after radiation therapy and deserve further investigation in precision radiation medicine approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ida Deichaite
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. .,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| | - Austin Hopper
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Lena Krockenberger
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Timothy J Sears
- Bioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Leisa Sutton
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Xenia Ray
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Sharabi
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ami Navon
- Department of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Parag Sanghvi
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Hannah Carter
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.,Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Influence of Treatment Package Time on outcomes in High-Risk Oral Cavity Carcinoma in patients receiving Adjuvant Radiation and Concurrent Systemic Therapy: A Multi-Institutional Oral Cavity Collaborative study. Oral Oncol 2022; 126:105781. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2022.105781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
12
|
Xia H, Huang Z, Liu S, Zhao X, He R, Wang Z, Shi W, Chen W, Li Z, Yu L, Huang P, Kang P, Su Z, Xu Y, Yam JWP, Cui Y. LncRNA DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 5: A crucial regulator in malignant tumors. Biomed Pharmacother 2021; 141:111889. [PMID: 34323697 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2021] [Revised: 05/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA), a subgroup of ncRNA with a length of more than 200 nt without protein coding function, has been recognized by the academia for its mediating effects of dysregulated expression on the tumorigenesis and development of a variety of tumors. LncRNA DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 5 (DGCR5), originally found to induce DiGeorge syndrome, has been confirmed to be extremely dysregulated in multiple tumors, which mediates the malignant phenotypes of hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, etc. through the regulation of Wnt/β-catenin, MEK/ERK1/2 and other cancerous signaling pathways as a molecular sponge. Researches on the cancerous derivation-related pathways involved in DGCR5 can provide potential molecular intervention targets for tumor precision treatment. Moreover, liquid biopsy based on the detection of DGCR5 in body fluids is also expected to provide a non-invasive evaluation method for the early diagnosis and prognostic evaluation of malignant tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haoming Xia
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Ziyue Huang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Shuqiang Liu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xudong Zhao
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Risheng He
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Zhongrui Wang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Wenguang Shi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Wangming Chen
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Zhizhou Li
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Liang Yu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China; The key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Peng Huang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China; The key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Pengcheng Kang
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Zhilei Su
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yi Xu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China; The key Laboratory of Myocardial Ischemia, Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China; Department of Pathology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong.
| | - Judy Wai Ping Yam
- Department of Pathology, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 999077, Hong Kong.
| | - Yunfu Cui
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150086, Heilongjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sumner W, Ray X, Sutton L, Rebibo D, Marincola F, Sanghvi P, Moiseenko V, Deichaite I. Gene alterations as predictors of radiation-induced toxicity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Transl Med 2021; 19:212. [PMID: 34001187 PMCID: PMC8130372 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-021-02876-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Optimizing the therapeutic ratio for radiation therapy (RT) in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is uniquely challenging owing to high rates of early and late toxicity involving nearby organs at risk. These toxicities have a profound impact on treatment compliance and quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests that RT dose alone cannot fully account for the variable severity of RT-related adverse events (rtAEs) observed in HNSCC patients. Next-generation sequencing has become an increasingly valuable tool with widespread use in the oncology field and is being robustly explored for predicting rtAEs beyond dosimetric data. Methods Patients who had Foundation Medicine sequencing data and received RT for primary or locally recurrent HNSCC were selected for this study. Early and late toxicity data were collected and reported based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Dosimetric parameters were collected for pertinent structures. Results A total of HNSCC 37 patients were analyzed in this study. Genetic alterations in BRCA2, ERBB3, NOTCH1 and CCND1 were all associated with higher mean grade of toxicity with BRCA2 alteration implicated in all toxicity parameters evaluated including mucositis, early dysphagia, xerostomia and to a lesser extent, late dysphagia. Interestingly, patients who exhibited alterations in both BRCA2 and ERBB3 experienced a twofold or greater increase in early dysphagia, early xerostomia and late dysphagia compared to ERBB3 alteration alone. Furthermore, several gene alterations were associated with improved toxicity outcomes. Within an RT supersensitive patient subset, alterations were found in TNFAIP3, HNF1A, SPTA1 and CASP8. All of these alterations were not found in the RT insensitive patient subset. We found 17 gene alterations in the RT insensitive patient subset that were not found in the RT supersensitive patient subset. Conclusion Despite consistent RT dosimetric parameters, patients with HNSCC experience heterogeneous patterns of rtAEs. Identifying factors associated with toxicity outcomes offers a new avenue for personalized precision RT therapy and prophylactic management. Here, next-generation sequencing in a population of HNSCC patients correlates several genetic alterations with severity of rtAEs. Further analysis is urgently needed to identify genetic patterns associated with rtAEs in order to reduce harmful outcomes in this challenging population. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-021-02876-5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney Sumner
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Xenia Ray
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Leisa Sutton
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Daniel Rebibo
- Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | - Parag Sanghvi
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Vitali Moiseenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Ida Deichaite
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. .,Moores Cancer Center, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Wang S, Zhu W, Ouyang L, Li J, Li S, Yang X. Up-Regulation of Tiam1 Promotes the Radioresistance of Laryngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Through Activation of the JNK/ATF-2 Signaling Pathway. Onco Targets Ther 2020; 13:7065-7074. [PMID: 32801742 PMCID: PMC7382609 DOI: 10.2147/ott.s257748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2020] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Our previous study has revealed that T-lymphoma invasion and metastasis-inducing factor 1 (Tiam1) overexpression are significantly associated with aggressive behavior and poor prognosis in patients with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC). However, the influence of Tiam1 in the radioresistance of LSCC and its mechanism have never been elucidated. Materials and Methods Western blotting was used to confirm the relationship between Tiam1 and the JNK/ATF-2 signaling pathway. To explore the specific functions of Tiam1 and JNK/ATF-2 signaling pathway on the proliferation and apoptosis of LSCC after radiation, cloning formation assay and flow cytometry were conducted in vitro, and the experiments on a xenograft mouse model and TUNEL assay were performed in vivo. Results Western blotting indicated that Tiam1 can regulate the JNK/ATF-2 signaling pathway through the influence of the activity of JNK and ATF-2. Up-regulation of Tiam1 could promote proliferation and inhibit apoptosis of LSCC after radiation both in vitro and in vivo. Moreover, the down-regulation of the JNK/ATF-2 signaling pathway reduced the radioresistance of LSCC caused by Tiam1 up-regulation. Conclusion These results suggest that the up-regulation of Tiam1 expression can promote the radioresistance of LSCC through activation of the JNK/ATF-2 signaling pathway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Weiyu Zhu
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, Guangdong, People's Republic of China
| | - Lei Ouyang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Jingkun Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Shisheng Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| | - Xinming Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011, Hunan, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Forsthoefel MK, Ballew E, Unger KR, Ahn PH, Rudra S, Pang D, Collins SP, Dritschilo A, Harter W, Paudel N, Collins BT, Lischalk JW. Early Experience of the First Single-Room Gantry Mounted Active Scanning Proton Therapy System at an Integrated Cancer Center. Front Oncol 2020; 10:861. [PMID: 32547953 PMCID: PMC7273355 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Review the early experience with a single-room gantry mounted active scanning proton therapy system. Material and Methods: All patients treated with proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) were enrolled in an institutional review board-approved patient registry. Proton beam radiotherapy was delivered with a 250 MeV gantry mounted synchrocyclotron in a single-room integrated facility within the pre-existing cancer center. Demographic data, cancer diagnoses, treatment technique, and geographic patterns were obtained for all patients. Treatment plans were evaluated for mixed modality therapy. Insurance approval data was collected for all patients treated with PBT. Results: A total of 132 patients were treated with PBT between March 2018 and June 2019. The most common oncologic subsites treated included the central nervous system (22%), gastrointestinal tract (20%), and genitourinary tract (20%). The most common histologies treated included prostate adenocarcinoma (19%), non-small cell lung cancer (10%), primary CNS gliomas (8%), and esophageal cancer (8%). Rationale for PBT treatment included limitation of dose to adjacent critical organs at risk (67%), reirradiation (19%), and patient comorbidities (11%). Patients received at least one x-ray fraction delivered as prescribed (36%) or less commonly due to unplanned machine downtime (34%). Concurrent systemic therapy was administered to 57 patients (43%). Twenty-six patients (20%) were initially denied insurance coverage and required peer-to-peers (65%), written appeals (12%), secondary insurance approval (12%), and comparison x-ray to proton plans (8%) for subsequent approval. Proton beam radiotherapy approval required a median of 17 days from insurance submission. Discussion: Incorporation of PBT into our existing cancer center allowed for multidisciplinary oncologic treatment of a diverse population of patients. Insurance coverage for PBT presents as a significant hurdle and improvements are needed to provide more timely access to necessary oncologic care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew K Forsthoefel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Elizabeth Ballew
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Keith R Unger
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Peter H Ahn
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sonali Rudra
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Dalong Pang
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Sean P Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Anatoly Dritschilo
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - William Harter
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Nitika Paudel
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Brian T Collins
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Jonathan W Lischalk
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, United States
| |
Collapse
|