Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Posterior Fossa Lesions: An Initial Experience

Safety and Efficacy of Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy as Upfront Therapy in Primary Glioblastoma and IDH-Mutant Astrocytoma: A Meta-Analysis

Although primary studies have reported the safety and efficacy of LITT as a primary treatment in glioma, they are limited by sample sizes and institutional variation in stereotactic parameters such as temperature and laser power. The current literature has yet to provide pooled statistics on outcomes solely for primary brain tumors according to the 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5). In the present study, we identify recent articles on primary CNS neoplasms treated with LITT without prior intervention, focusing on relationships with molecular profile, PFS, and OS. This meta-analysis includes the extraction of data from primary sources across four databases using the Covidence systematic review manager. The pooled data suggest LITT may be a safe primary management option with tumor ablation rates of 94.8% and 84.6% in IDH-wildtype glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and IDH-mutant astrocytoma, respectively. For IDH-wildtype GBM, the pooled PFS and OS were 5.0 and 9.0 months, respectively. Similar to rates reported in the prior literature, the neurologic and non-neurologic complication rates for IDH-wildtype GBM were 10.3% and 4.8%, respectively. The neurologic and non-neurologic complication rates were somewhat higher in the IDH-mutant astrocytoma cohort at 33% and 8.3%, likely due to a smaller cohort size.

Meta-analysis of the impact of laser interstitial hyperthermia on wound healing complications in brain tumors

High-grade gliomas (HGGs) may be amenable to the neurosurgical technique known as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT), which delivers thermal energy to interstitial brain injuries and wounds with pinpoint accuracy. The purpose of this extensive meta-analysis was to evaluate the effects of LITT on wound complications among patients who have brain tumours. Diverse conclusions emerge from a systematic review of pertinent studies, necessitating a comprehensive examination. The meta-analysis, performed utilizing the meta library provided by the R package meta, reveals an initial significant overall effect (RR: -2.1262, 95% CI [-2.7466, -1.5059], p < 0.0001) accompanied by considerable heterogeneity among studies (I2  = 61.13%). Following analyses that specifically examined the incidence of wounds, a complex correlation was found (RR: 0.0471, 95% CI [0.0264, 0.0842], p < 0.0001), indicating that LITT has a discernible but insignificant effect on the occurrence of wounds. Although the meta-analysis emphasizes a notable decrease in wound complications subsequent to LITT treatment, additional research is warranted due to constraints in standardized reporting, data accessibility, and small sample sizes. The results of this study underscore the need for exhaustive protocols to analyse wound complications in patients with brain tumours undergoing LITT.

Gold Nanostars Obviate Limitations to Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (LITT) for the Treatment of Intracranial Tumors

PURPOSE

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an effective minimally invasive treatment option for intracranial tumors. Our group produced plasmonics-active gold nanostars (GNS) designed to preferentially accumulate within intracranial tumors and amplify the ablative capacity of LITT.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

The impact of GNS on LITT coverage capacity was tested in ex vivo models using clinical LITT equipment and agarose gel-based phantoms of control and GNS-infused central "tumors." In vivo accumulation of GNS and amplification of ablation were tested in murine intracranial and extracranial tumor models followed by intravenous GNS injection, PET/CT, two-photon photoluminescence, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), histopathology, and laser ablation.

RESULTS

Monte Carlo simulations demonstrated the potential of GNS to accelerate and specify thermal distributions. In ex vivo cuboid tumor phantoms, the GNS-infused phantom heated 5.5× faster than the control. In a split-cylinder tumor phantom, the GNS-infused border heated 2× faster and the surrounding area was exposed to 30% lower temperatures, with margin conformation observed in a model of irregular GNS distribution. In vivo, GNS preferentially accumulated within intracranial tumors on PET/CT, two-photon photoluminescence, and ICP-MS at 24 and 72 hours and significantly expedited and increased the maximal temperature achieved in laser ablation compared with control.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results provide evidence for use of GNS to improve the efficiency and potentially safety of LITT. The in vivo data support selective accumulation within intracranial tumors and amplification of laser ablation, and the GNS-infused phantom experiments demonstrate increased rates of heating, heat contouring to tumor borders, and decreased heating of surrounding regions representing normal structures.

The Evolution of Laser-Induced Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Gliomas

Laser-induced thermal therapy (LITT) has evolved over the past two decades to treat a number of intracranial pathologies. Although it initially emerged as a salvage treatment of surgically inoperable tumors or recurrent lesions that had exhausted more conventional treatments, it is now being used as a primary, first-line treatment in certain instances with outcomes comparable to traditional surgical resection. The authors discuss the evolution of LITT in the treatment of gliomas and future directions, which may further enhance the efficacy of this procedure.

Posterior Fossa Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Children

Real-time, MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is emerging as a minimally invasive technique for epilepsy surgery and for deep-seated tumors in the pediatric population. However, MRgLITT for posterior fossa lesions poses a unique challenge that is especially evident in this age range and remains understudied. In this study, we report our experience and analyze the current literature on MRgLITT for the treatment of posterior fossa in children.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Radionecrosis

Radiotherapy is widely used for brain tumors but can cause radiation necrosis (RN). Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a relatively new therapeutic modality for RN and its impact on patient outcome is still not well understood. Based on a systematic literature search (n=33), the authors discuss the available evidence. Most studies found a positive safety/efficacy profile, as LITT may help to lengthen survival, prevent progression, taper steroids, and improve neurological symptoms while remaining safe. Prospective studies on this subject are needed and may result in LITT becoming an essential therapeutic option for the treatment of RN.

Comparable safety profile between neuro-oncology procedures involving stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) followed by laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) and LITT alone procedures

INTRODUCTION

Tissue diagnosis through stereotactic needle biopsy (SNB) is often needed prior to laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). Whether these procedures should be performed in the same surgery or in separate settings remain unclear. As a first step to address this question, we assess safety profile of procedures involving LITT alone versus SNB + LITT.

METHODS

Using International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes, we queried the National Readmissions Database (NRD, 2010-2018) for malignant brain tumor patients who underwent either (1) LITT alone or (2) elective LITT in combination with SNB (SNB + LITT). Survey regression methods were utilized. Additionally, the procedural outcome of LITT or SNB + LITT performed by the senior surgeon (2014-2022) were reviewed.

RESULTS

During the study period, an estimated 678 malignant brain tumor patients underwent LITT alone versus 373 patients that underwent SNB + LITT. Patients undergoing LITT and SNB + LITT exhibited statistically comparable median lengths of hospital stay (IQR; LITT = 2 day [1, 3]; SNB + LITT = 1 day [1, 3]; p = 0.405) and likelihood of routine discharge (LITT = 73.5%; SNB + LITT = 81.1%; p = 0.068). The odds of 30-day medical or neurological readmissions were comparable between LITT and SNB + LITT treated patients (all p ≥ 0.793). In the single surgeon experience of 218 procedures performed over an eight year period (2014-2022), the complications (LITT = 3.9%; SNB + LITT = 2.6%, p = 0.709), discharge within 48 h (LITT = 84.5%; SNB + LITT = 87.8%; p = 0.556), routine discharge (LITT = 91.3%; SNB + LITT = 93.9%; p = 0.604), and unplanned 30-day readmission (LITT = 3.9%; SNB + LITT = 1.7%; p = 0.423) were similarly comparable between LITT and SNB + LITT.

CONCLUSION

The length of hospital stay, the likelihood of routine discharge, and 30-day readmission for malignant brain tumor patients who underwent LITT and SNB + LITT were comparable.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for the Treatment of Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive treatment option for intracranial tumors that are challenging to treat via traditional methods; however, its safety and efficacy are not yet well validated in the literature. The objectives of the study were to assess the available evidence of the indications and adverse events (AEs) of LITT and 1-year progression-free survival and 1-year overall survival in the treatment of primary and secondary brain tumors.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted through the databases PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library until October 2021. Comparative and descriptive studies, except for case reports, were included in the meta-analysis. Separate analyses by tumor type (high-grade gliomas, including World Health Organization grade 4 astrocytomas [which include glioblastomas] as a specific subgroup; low-grade gliomas; and brain metastases) were conducted. Pooled effect sizes and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) were generated via random-effects models.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria, yielding 826 patients for meta-analysis. There were 829 lesions in total, of which 361 were classified as high-grade gliomas, 116 as low-grade gliomas, 337 as metastatic brain tumors, and 15 as nonglial tumors. Indications for offering LITT included deep/inaccessible tumor (12 studies), salvage therapy after failed radiosurgery (9), failures of ≥2 treatment options (3), in pediatric patients (4), patient preference (1); indications were nonspecific in 12 studies. Pooled incidence of all (minor or major) procedure-related AEs was 30% (95% CI, 27%-40%) for all tumors. Pooled incidence of neurologic deficits (minor or major) was 16% (12%-22%); postprocedural edema 14% (8%-22%); seizure 6% (4%-9%); hematoma 20% (14%-29%); deep vein thrombosis 19% (11%-30%); hydrocephalus 8% (5%-12%); and wound infection 5% (3%-7%). One-year progression-free survival was 18.6% (11.3%-29.0%) in high-grade gliomas, 16.9% (11.6%-24.0%) among the grade 4 astrocytomas; and 51.2% (36.7%-65.5%) in brain metastases. One-year overall survival was 43.0% (36.0%-50.0%) in high-grade glioma, 45.9% (95% CI, 37.9%-54%) in grade 4 astrocytomas; 93.0% (42.3%-100%) in low-grade gliomas, and 56.3% (47.0%-65.3%) in brain metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

New neurologic deficits and postprocedural edema were the most reported AEs after LITT, albeit mostly transient. This meta-analysis provides the best statistical estimates of progression and survival outcomes based on the available information. LITT is generally a safe procedure for selected patients, and future well-designed comparative studies on its outcomes versus the current standard of care should be performed.

The safety and feasibility of three-dimensional visualization planning system for CT-guided microwave ablation of stage I NSCLC (diameter ≤2.5 cm): A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Microwave ablation (MWA) of lung tumors is a technique that is dependent on the ablationist's level of expertise. The selection of the optimum puncture path and determination of appropriate ablative parameters is the key to the success and safe of the procedure. The objective of this study was to describe the clinical use of a novel three-dimensional visualization ablation planning system (3D-VAPS) for aided MWA of stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

This was a single-arm, single-center, retrospective study. From May 2020 to July 2022, 113 consented patients with stage I NSCLC received MWA treatment in 120 MWA sessions. The 3D-VAPS was used to determine that: (1) the overlap between the gross tumor region and simulated ablation; (2) the proper posture and appropriate puncture site on the surface of the body; (3) the puncture path; and (4) presetting preliminarily ablative parameters. Patients were monitored with contrast-enhanced CT scans at 1, 3, and 6 months, as well as every 6 months following that. The primary endpoints were technical success and a complete ablation rate. Local progression-free survival (LPFS), overall survival (OS), and comorbidities were secondary study objectives.

RESULTS

The mean diameter of tumors was 1.9 ± 0.4 cm (range 0.9-2.5 cm). The mean duration was 5.34 ± 1.28 min (range 3.0-10.0 min). The mean power output was 42.58 ± 4.23 (range 30.0-50.0W). The median follow-up time was 19.0 months (6.0-26.0 months). The technical success rate was 100%. Three-month after the procedure, the complete ablation rate was 97.35%. 6, 9, 12, and 24 months LPFS rates were 100%, 98.23%, 98.23%, and 96.46%, respectively. One-year and 2-year OS rates were 100% and 100%. There were no patients who died both during the procedure and after the MWA of 30 days. The complications after MWA included pneumothorax (38.33%), pleural effusion (26.67%), intrapulmonary hemorrhage (31.67%), and pulmonary infection (2.50%).

CONCLUSIONS

This research describes and confirms that 3D-VAPS is a feasibility and safe method for MWA of stage I NSCLC treatment. 3D-VAPS may be helpful to optimize the puncture path, assess reasonable ablative parameters, and minimize complications.

Laser hyperthermia: Past, present, and future

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is an ablative procedure using heat from a laser to provide cytoreduction in tissue. It is a minimally invasive procedure that has been used in intracranial pathologies such as high-grade gliomas, metastatic lesions, epilepsy, and other lesions. While LITT may offer a more acceptable complication profile compared to open surgery, the role of laser therapy for intracranial lesions in current treatment paradigms continues to evolve. This review will focus on the background and application of LITT, the current evidence for its use, and future directions for the technology.

Repeat laser interstitial thermal therapy for recurrent primary and metastatic intracranial tumors

Background:

Repeat craniotomy in patients with primary and metastatic brain tumors carries significant morbidity and can delay adjuvant treatments. Repeat laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for recurrent disease has been described and could benefit patients with limited cytoreductive options. We aim to describe the indications, safety, and efficacy of repeat LITT for recurrent primary and metastatic intracranial tumors.

Methods:

Patients undergoing repeat ablations for the same lesion were included in the study. We retrospectively analyzed 13 patients treated with 29 total LITT ablations.

Results:

Eleven patients were treated for glioblastoma (GBM), while two had brain metastases. Eleven patients had LITT performed only 2 times, while three patients underwent three total iterations of LITT for disease recurrence. Median length of stay after the 1^st ablation was 2 days, while the median length of stay after the 2^nd ablation was 1 day. The median time to resuming adjuvant treatments after the 1^st LITT was 11 days. The median time to resuming adjuvant treatments after the 2^nd LITT was 28 days. Four patients after the 1^st and 2^nd LITT sustained deficits persisting through 30-day follow-up. The median progression-free survival among the GBM patients from the first ablation was 6.0 months, 3.2 months from the 2^nd ablation, and 2.1 months from the 3^rd ablation.

Conclusion:

Recurrent tumors, especially GBM, can be safely treated using repeat LITT when surgery cannot be effectively performed. Our results indicate that patients tolerate the procedure well and have a meaningful survival given the salvage nature of the procedure.

Open surgery or laser interstitial thermal therapy for low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors of the temporal lobe: A single-institution consecutive series

Outcomes of treating low-grade epilepsy-associated tumors (LEATs) in the temporal lobe with MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) remain poorly characterized. This study aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of treating temporal lobe LEATs with MRgLITT versus open resection in a consecutive single-institution series. We reviewed all adult patients with epilepsy that underwent surgery for temporal lobe LEATs at our institution between 2002 and 2019, during which time we switched from open surgery to MRgLITT. Surgical outcome was categorized by Engel classification at >12mo follow-up and Kaplan-Meir analysis of seizure freedom. We recorded hospital length of stay, adverse events, and available neuropsychological results. Of 14 total patients, 7 underwent 9 open resections, 6 patients underwent MRgLITT alone, and 1 patient underwent an open resection followed by MRgLITT. Baseline group demographics differed and were notable for preoperative duration of epilepsy of 9.0 years (range 1-36) for open resection versus 14.0 years (range 2-34) for MRgLITT. Median length of stay was one day shorter for MRgLITT compared to open resection (p=<.0001). There were no major adverse events in the series, but there were fewer minor adverse events following MRgLITT. At 12mo follow-up, 50% (5/10) of patients undergoing open resection and 57% (4/7) of patients undergoing MRgLITT were free of disabling seizures (Engel I). When comparing patients who underwent similar procedures in the dominant temporal lobe, patients undergoing MRgLITT had fewer and milder material-specific neuropsychological declines than patients undergoing open resections. In this small series, MRgLITT was comparably safe and effective relative to open resection of temporal lobe LEATs.

Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Posterior Fossa Lesions: A Systematic Review and Analysis of Multi-Institutional Outcomes

Background: Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has emerged as a treatment option for deep-seated primary and metastatic brain lesions; however, hardly any data exist regarding LITT for lesions of the posterior fossa. Methods: A quantitative systematic review was performed. Article selection was performed by searching MEDLINE (using PubMed), Scopus, and Cochrane electronic bibliographic databases. Inclusion criteria were studies assessing LITT on posterior fossa tumors. Results: 16 studies comprising 150 patients (76.1% female) with a mean age of 56.47 years between 2014 and 2021 were systematically reviewed for treatment outcomes and efficacy. Morbidity and mortality data could be extracted for 131 of the 150 patients. Death attributed to treatment failure, disease progression, recurrence, or postoperative complications occurred in 6.87% (9/131) of the pooled sample. Procedure-related complications, usually including new neurologic deficits, occurred in approximately 14.5% (19/131) of the pooled sample. Neurologic deficits improved with time in most cases, and 78.6% (103/131) of the pooled sample experienced no complications and progression-free survival at the time of last follow-up. Conclusions: LITT for lesions of the posterior fossa continues to show promising data. Future clinical cohort studies are required to further direct treatment recommendations.

Magnetic Resonance-guided Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy (MRgLITT) for Brainstem Pathologies

OBJECTIVE

Magnetic Resonance-guided Laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRgLITT) is a minimally invasive and effective treatment option that can potentially treat deep-seated pathologies in cases where there are no safe open surgical corridors. In this report, we present our experience using MRgLITT for brainstem pathologies.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent MRgLITT for pathologies within or closely surrounding the brainstem between 2011 and 2020. The patients underwent stereotactic laser placement in the operating suite and were transported to the MRI suite for laser ablation with real-time monitoring. Demographics, operative parameters and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of twelve patients underwent MRgLITT for brainstem pathologies. The average age of the patients was 47.6 years old, ranging from 4 to 75. Pathologies included both primary and metastatic intracranial tumors. The average pre-ablation volume of the targets was 2.4cm³ ±SEM=0.50. The average time of ablation was 324.3± 60.7 seconds and average post-ablation volume was 2.92±0.53 cm³. There was one perioperative mortality directly related to the procedure and seven cases of post-operative deficits. Two patients had recurrence after MRgLITT and opted to undergo additional alternative treatments.

CONCLUSION

The brainstem represents formidable territory even for minimally invasive procedures. The overall morbidity and mortality remains high, and the probability of achieving a meaningful outcome needs to be carefully assessed.

Supralesional Ablation Volumes Are Feasible in the Posterior Fossa and May Provide Enhanced Symptomatic Relief

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for posterior fossa lesions remains rare as the small size of the infratentorial compartment, proximity to the brainstem, and thickness/angulation of the occipital bone creates barriers to procedural success. Furthermore, evaluation of the effect of ablation volume on outcomes is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze our institutional experience with LITT in the posterior fossa stratifying perioperative and long-term outcomes by ablation volumes.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with posterior fossa lesions treated with LITT from 2013 to 2020 were identified. Local progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, steroid dependence, and edema reduction were evaluated with Kaplan-Meier analysis grouped by ablation volume. Preoperative, postoperative, and last known Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) were compared using a matched paired t test.

RESULTS

No differences in pathology, preoperative KPS, or preoperative lesion volume were found between patients with total (100%-200% increase in pre-LITT lesion volume) versus radical (>200% increase in pre-LITT lesion volume) ablations. Patients who underwent radical ablation had a higher postoperative KPS (93 vs 82, P = .02) and higher KPS (94 vs 87, P = .04) and greater reduction in perilesional edema at last follow-up (P = .01). Median follow-up was 80.8 wk.

CONCLUSION

Despite obvious anatomical challenges, our results demonstrate that radical ablations are both feasible and safe in the posterior fossa. Furthermore, radical ablations may lead to greater decreases in perilesional edema and improved functional status both immediately after surgery and at last follow-up. Thus, LITT should be considered for patients with otherwise unresectable or radioresistant posterior fossa lesions.

A customized 3D implant to target laser interstitial thermal therapy ablation of a posterior fossa mass

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive neurosurgical technique that has been demonstrated to successfully ablate intracranial tumors. While LITT for supratentorial lesions can often be straightforward, ablation of infratentorial lesions can be difficult with current targeting technologies and instrumentation. The anatomical difficulty of targeting posterior fossa masses can be further complicated in patients who have had a prior craniectomy or other procedure that removed the bone that is required to set the surgical trajectory. This article describes use of a three-dimensional (3D)-printed customized surgical implant to improve and enable targeting of posterior fossa lesions using LITT, particularly in the setting of prior craniectomy. A 3D-printed implant was customized for a patient with a history of metastatic lung cancer and prior posterior fossa craniectomy who presented for treatment of a progressively enlarging contrast-enhancing lesion in the right cerebellar hemisphere. The device included a built-in bolt trajectory for LITT ablation. The temporary implant was successfully fabricated for use with laser ablation of a right cerebellar mass. Three potential trajectories for the LITT bolt were incorporated into the temporary implant, but only the primary trajectory was utilized. Laser ablation was performed with the implant and a SideFire laser probe. Customized 3D-printed implants can enable the use of LITT for patients who would not otherwise be candidates.

Laser thermal therapy in the management of high-grade gliomas

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a minimally invasive therapy that have been used for brain tumors, epilepsy, chronic pain, and other spine pathologies. This therapy is performed under imaging and stereotactic guidance to precisely direct the probe and ablate the area of interest using real-time magnetic resonance (MR) thermography. LITT has gained popularity as a treatment for glioma because of its minimally invasive nature, small skin incision, repeatability, shorter hospital stay, and the possibility of receiving adjuvant therapy shortly after surgery instead of several weeks as required after open surgical resection. Several reports have demonstrated the usefulness of LITT in the treatment of newly-diagnosed and recurrent gliomas. In this review, we will summarize the recent evidence of this therapy in the field of glioma surgery and the future perspectives of the use of LITT combined with other treatment strategies for this devastating disease.

Laser interstitial thermotherapy (LITT) for the treatment of tumors of the brain and spine: a brief review

INTRODUCTION

Laser Interstitial Thermotherapy (LITT; also known as Stereotactic Laser Ablation or SLA), is a minimally invasive treatment modality that has recently gained prominence in the treatment of malignant primary and metastatic brain tumors and radiation necrosis and studies for treatment of spinal metastasis has recently been reported.

METHODS

Here we provide a brief literature review of the various contemporary uses for LITT and their reported outcomes.

RESULTS

Historically, the primary indication for LITT has been for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). However, indications have continued to expand and now include gliomas of different grades, brain metastasis (BM), radiation necrosis (RN), other types of brain tumors as well as spine metastasis. LITT is emerging as a safe, reliable, minimally invasive clinical approach, particularly for deep seated, focal malignant brain tumors and radiation necrosis. The role of LITT for treatment of other types of tumors of the brain and for spine tumors appears to be evolving at a small number of centers. While the technology appears to be safe and increasingly utilized, there have been few prospective clinical trials and most published studies combine different pathologies in the same report.

CONCLUSION

Well-designed prospective trials will be required to firmly establish the role of LITT in the treatment of lesions of the brain and spine.

Stereotactic Laser Ablation of Glioblastoma

The previous decade has seen an expansion in the use of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for a variety of pathologies. LITT has been used to treat both newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), especially in deep-seated, difficult-to-access lesions where open resection is otherwise infeasible or in patients who would not tolerate craniotomy. This review aims to describe the current state of the technology and operative technique, as well as summarize the outcomes data and future research regarding LITT as a treatment of GBM.

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy for posterior fossa neoplasms

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been increasingly used to treat a number of intracranial pathologies, though its use in the posterior fossa has been limited to a few small series. We performed a multi-institutional review of targets in the posterior fossa, reporting the efficacy and safety profile associated with laser ablation in this region of the brain.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients undergoing LITT in the posterior fossa was performed from August 2010 to March 2020. Patient demographic information was collected alongside the operative parameters and patient outcomes. Reported outcomes included local control of the lesion, postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and steroid requirements.

RESULTS

58 patients across four institutions underwent LITT in the posterior fossa for 60 tumors. The median pre-ablation tumor volume was 2.24 cm³. 48 patients (50 tumors) were available for follow-up. An 84% (42/50) overall local control rate was achieved at 9.5 months median follow up. There were two procedural complications, including insertional hemorrhage and laser misplacement and 12/58 (21%) patients developed new neurological deficits. There was one procedure related death. The median length of hospital stay was 1 day, with 20.7% of patients requiring discharge to a rehabilitation facility.

CONCLUSIONS

LITT is an effective approach for treating pathology in the posterior fossa. The average target size is smaller than what has been reported in the supratentorial space. Care must be taken to prevent injury to surrounding structures given the close proximity of critical structures in this region.

The intersection between immunotherapy and laser interstitial thermal therapy: a multipronged future of neuro-oncology

The rise of immunotherapy (IT) in oncological treatment has greatly improved outcomes in a number of disease states. However, its use in tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) remains limited for multiple reasons related to the unique immunologic tumor microenvironment. As such, it is valuable to consider the intersection of IT with additional treatment methods that may improve access to the CNS and effectiveness of existing IT modalities. One such combination is the pairing of IT with localized hyperthermia (HT) generated through technologies such as laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT). The wide-ranging immunomodulatory effects of localized and whole-body HT have been investigated for some time. Hyperthermia has demonstrated immunostimulatory effects at the level of tumor cells, immune cells, and the broader environment governing potential immune surveillance. A thorough understanding of these effects as well as the current and upcoming investigations of such in combination with IT is important in considering the future directions of neuro-oncology.

Hyperthermia treatment advances for brain tumors

Hyperthermia therapy (HT) of cancer is a well-known treatment approach. With the advent of new technologies, HT approaches are now important for the treatment of brain tumors. We review current clinical applications of HT in neuro-oncology and ongoing preclinical research aiming to advance HT approaches to clinical practice. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is currently the most widely utilized thermal ablation approach in clinical practice mainly for the treatment of recurrent or deep-seated tumors in the brain. Magnetic hyperthermia therapy (MHT), which relies on the use of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and alternating magnetic fields (AMFs), is a new quite promising HT treatment approach for brain tumors. Initial MHT clinical studies in combination with fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in patients have been completed in Europe with encouraging results. Another combination treatment with HT that warrants further investigation is immunotherapy. HT approaches for brain tumors will continue to a play an important role in neuro-oncology.

Lessons Learned in Using Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy for Treatment of Brain Tumors: A Case Series of 238 Patients from a Single Institution

BACKGROUND

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is a novel, minimally invasive alternative to craniotomy, and as with any new technology, comes with a learning curve.

OBJECTIVE

We present our experience detailing the evolution of this technology in our practice in one of the largest patient cohorts to date regarding LITT in neuro-oncology.

METHODS

We reviewed 238 consecutive patients with brain tumor treated with LITT at our institution. Data on patient, surgery and tumor characteristics, and follow-up were collected. Patients were categorized into 2 cohorts: early (<2014, 100 patients) and recent (>2015, 138 patients). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 8.4 months.

RESULTS

The indications for LITT included gliomas (70.2%), radiation necrosis (21.0%), and metastasis (8.8%). Patient demographics stayed consistent between the 2 cohorts, with the exception of age (early, 54.3; recent, 58.4; P = 0.04). Operative time (6.6 vs. 3.5; P < 0.001) and number of trajectories (53.1% vs. 77.9% with 1 trajectory; P < 0.001) also decreased in the recent cohort. There was a significant decrease in permanent motor deficits over time (15.5 vs. 4.4%; P = 0.005) and 30-day mortality (4.1% vs. 1.5%) also decreased (not statistically significant) in the recent cohort. In terms of clinical outcomes, poor preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (≤70) were significantly correlated with increased permanent deficits (P = 0.001) and decreased overall survival (P < 0.001 for all time points).

CONCLUSIONS

We observed improvement in operative efficiency and permanent deficits over time and also patients with poor preoperative Karnofsky Performance Status achieved suboptimal outcomes with LITT. As many other treatment modalities, patient selection is important in this procedure.

Evolving Strategies to Potentially Further Optimize Surgical Interventions in Brain Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Provide an overview, the indications for use, and a synopsis of current literature regarding two evolving neurosurgical interventions-GammaTile therapy (GTT) and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT).

RECENT FINDINGS

GTT delivers immediate, uniform, high-dose radiation with avoidance of direct brain-to-seed contact. Innate properties of the novel carrier system and cesium-131 source may explain lower observed rate of radiation-induced necrosis (RIN) and support use in larger and previously irradiated lesions. LITT delivers focal laser energy to cause heat-generated necrosis. Case series suggest use in difficult-to-access lesions and treatment of RIN. Collaboration among subspecialties and remaining up-to-date on evolving technology is critical in developing individualized treatment plans for patients with brain cancer. While patients should be thoroughly counseled that these interventions are not standard of care, in optimal clinical scenarios, GTT and LITT could extend quantity and quality of life for patients with few remaining options. Prospective studies are needed to establish specific treatment parameters.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy in gliomas

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) has been used for brain metastasis, epilepsy, and necrosis, as well as gliomas as a minimally invasive treatment for many years. With the improvement of the thermal monitoring and ablation precision, especially the application of magnetic resonance (MR) thermography in the procedure and the available two commercial laser systems nowadays, LITT is gradually accepted by more neurosurgical centers. Recently, some new concepts, for example the adjuvant chemotherapy or radiation following LITT, the combination of immunotherapy and LITT regarding the glioma treatment are proposed and currently being investigated. The aim of this study is to summarize the evolution of LITT especially for brain gliomas and a possible outlook of the future.

Laser interstitial thermal therapy

Background

Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is becoming an increasingly popular technique for the treatment of brain lesions. More minimally invasive that open craniotomy for lesion resection, LITT may be more appropriate for lesions that are harder to access through an open approach, deeper lesions, and for patients who may not tolerate open surgery.

Methods

A search of the current primary literature on LITT for brain lesions on PubMed was performed. These studies were reviewed and updates on the radiological, pathological, and long-term outcomes after LITT for brain metastases, primary brain tumors, and radiation necrosis as well as common complications are included.

Results

Larger extent of ablation and LITT as frontline treatment were potential predictors of favorable progression-free and overall survival for primary brain tumors. In brain metastases, larger extent of ablation was more significantly associated with survival benefit, whereas tumor size was a possible predictor. The most common complications after LITT are transient and permanent weakness, cerebral edema, hemorrhage, seizures, and hyponatremia.

Conclusions

Although the current literature is limited by small sample sizes and primarily retrospective studies, LITT is a safe and effective treatment for brain lesions in the correct patient population.