The needs and experiences of women with gestational diabetes mellitus from minority ethnic backgrounds in high-income nations: A systematic integrative review

The perspectives of healthcare professionals in providing care to women with GDM in high-income nations: A qualitative systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) represents a growing challenge worldwide, with significant risks to both women and their babies that extend beyond the duration of the pregnancy and immediate post-partum period. Healthcare professionals (HCPs) play important roles in the screening, diagnosis, treatment and management of women with GDM.

METHODS

For this qualitative systematic review, a comprehensive search strategy explored the electronic databases Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, and Scopus, as well as the reference lists of the included papers, for primary studies investigating the experiences, perspectives and practices of HCPs providing care to women with GDM in high-income healthcare settings. Studies were assessed with the Crowe Critical Appraisal Tool, and findings were synthesised using the approach described by Thomas and Harden.

RESULTS

This review included 33 articles - 26 qualitative and seven mixed method studies, representing ten high-income nations. The total number of HCP participants represented across the studies is 989. This figure is constituted by medical professionals (n = 226), nurses and midwives (n = 583), allied health (n = 40) and other or not numerically specified HCPs (n = 140). From 149 findings, four major themes and 10 subthemes were constructed. The four major themes are: multidisciplinary collaboration; healthcare practice; organizational factors; and working with women.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

There are barriers to providing optimal care to women with GDM. Including, time and resource constraints, a lack of consensus in practice guidelines, and variable multidisciplinary collaboration. Moving forward, there needs to be a focus on more explicit guidelines, multidisciplinary collaboration, and appropriate resources to support HCPs in providing care to women to manage the short-term and longer-term risks that are associated with a pregnancy affected by GDM.

Exploring the lived experience of women with gestational diabetes: A cross-sectional Irish national survey

AIM

Gestational diabetes (GDM) poses risks of short- and long-term complications for mother and infant, emphasising the importance of antenatal and postpartum education and support. We aimed to understand the experiences and views of women with GDM in the Republic of Ireland.

METHODS

Women with current or previous GDM were invited to complete an online cross-sectional survey (April-June 2022). Recruitment utilised social media, local media and personal networks. The survey addressed demographics, GDM knowledge and experiences, breastfeeding and weight management during pregnancy and post-pregnancy GDM support needs. Descriptive statistics were conducted, and between-group comparisons were undertaken using the chi-square test. Content analysis was applied to free text data.

RESULTS

Amongst 231 respondents, most were aged 35-39 (42%); 70% experienced a single GDM pregnancy. Only 6% correctly identified their increased level of risk for developing type 2 diabetes. Under half (44.5%) of respondents reported sufficient time with health professionals to address GDM-related questions. Just over half (54.3%) reported attending for diabetes screening at 6-12 weeks postpartum. The majority (66%) expressed a desire for postpartum information, particularly on healthy eating and physical activity. Having a more recent GDM experience was associated with a stronger preference for weaning (p ≤ 0.001) and weight management information (p = 0.025). Qualitative analysis identified inconsistencies in healthcare messaging, significant concerns about a GDM diagnosis' impact on the pregnancy experience, and financial costs of diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore women's desire for appropriate information and support during and after pregnancy with GDM. Future interventions should address these needs to effectively promote chronic disease prevention after GDM.

From the shadows: A qualitative study of fathers' perspectives and experiences of their partner's gestational diabetes mellitus and its implications

AIMS

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects an increasing number of women each year. Research involving partners of women with GDM, such as fathers is limited, however, understanding their perspectives and involvement in GDM management could enhance health outcomes for both women and their families. This study aims to explore the impact and experiences of GDM on fathers in the perinatal period.

METHODS

Qualitative, individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted with individuals whose partners either currently had GDM or had been diagnosed with GDM within the past 3 years. All participants identified as biological fathers. Data were transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Nine fathers participated in the study. Analysis resulted in four themes that explored fathers' experiences of GDM during the perinatal period: 'navigating a GDM diagnosis', 'partnering in management and health', 'finding a place within the GDM journey' and 'the lasting impact of GDM'.

CONCLUSION

Fathers encountered wide-ranging impacts of their partners' GDM. Fathers provided both practical and emotional support to their partners. Engaging fathers in discussions at diagnosis and in management could facilitate the maintenance of positive health behaviour changes postpartum, potentially reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes for both parents.

Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a complication that affects 20% of pregnancies worldwide. It is associated with adverse short- and long-term cardiometabolic outcomes for both mother and infant. Effective management of GDM involves lifestyle modifications, including medical nutrition therapy (MNT) and physical activity (PA), with the addition of insulin or metformin if glycaemic control remains inadequate. However, substantial gaps persist in the determination of optimal medical nutrition therapy (MNT) for women with GDM. Challenges in MNT include individual variation in glucose tolerance and changing maternal physiology and dietary requirements during pregnancy. Achieving optimal glycaemic control depends on careful macronutrient balance, particularly the distribution and quality of carbohydrate intake and sufficient protein and fat intake. Additionally, micronutrient deficiencies, such as inadequate vitamin D, calcium, and essential minerals, may exacerbate oxidative stress, inflammation, and glycaemic dysregulation, further impacting foetal growth and development. Cultural beliefs and dietary practices among pregnant women can also hinder adherence to recommended nutritional guidelines. Conditions like hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) affect ~1% to 2% of pregnant women can result in unintended energy and nutrient deficits. This special issue explores the current evidence and major barriers to optimising dietary therapy for women with GDM. It also identifies future research priorities to advance clinical practice, improve maternal and foetal outcomes, and address gaps in personalised nutrition interventions.

Women's experiences and needs in the use of digital technologies for the management of gestational diabetes: An integrative systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) represents a widespread complication occurring during pregnancy, posing potential risks to both expectant mothers and their babies. Evidence shows that digital technologies provide comparable levels of care to conventional methods for GDM self-management, which help to improve maternal and neonatal outcomes. This systematic review aimed to explore women's experiences in using digital technologies, inform future technology design for gestational diabetes and potentially help improve usability.

METHODS

An integrative systematic review including quantitative, qualitative and mixed-method studies. The search was conducted in five databases including CINAHL, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and PsycInfo. Studies were eligible when including the experience of using digital technologies for GDM self-management from the women's perspective. The screening processes were conducted by two independent reviewers and reached an overall moderate agreement on inter-rater reliability. Quality appraisal was conducted using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool version 2018.

RESULTS

Thirty peer-reviewed articles were included, with a predominant or partial focus on five types of digital technologies including mobile applications, virtual care services, webpages, digital devices, and online communities. Women's experiences and needs of using GDM digital technologies were synthesised into five overarching themes: (1) sufficient and straightforward GDM-relevant educational information; (2) advanced personalisation and broader commitments in coaching components; (3) easy data recording and advanced data visualisation in data management; (4) improved healthcare professionals' engagement; (5) development of online community interfaces.

CONCLUSION

This integrative systematic review gives information on the types of available features across technologies and specific preferences for features by women with GDM. According to the inferred gaps, efforts should be made to facilitate women's self-monitoring using data and feedback, provide personalised information corresponding to women's condition, meet different behaviour change needs using customised coaching features, and enable wider access to information and support.

"I didn't really fit into any boxes": understanding the experiences of women affected by cancer in pregnancy and up to one-year postpartum-a mixed-method systematic review

PURPOSE

Little is known about women's experiences of cancer during pregnancy and up to one-year postpartum. As the incidence of gestational cancer rises parallel to increasing rates of early onset cancers there is an imperative need to understand their experiences. The aim of this research is to understand women's experiences of gestational cancer during pregnancy and up to one-year postpartum.

METHODS

This systematic integrative review followed the JBI methodology for mixed method systematic reviews (MMSR) which integrates empirical data from qualitative and quantitative primary studies. The search strategy included electronic databases, APA PsycINFO, CINHAL, Medline, Scopus, and the Web of Science Core Collection. The review has been reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive methodological quality assessment was undertaken using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included, reporting on the experiences of 266 women. The findings represented the women's insight on the psychological impact of their gestational cancer, the impact on women's identity as a mother and a patient, and women's experiences of complex care.

CONCLUSIONS

Gestational cancer reflects an emerging focus of clinical practice and an opportunity for much needed new research to explore woman-centered care exploring supportive care needs and models of maternity care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Women's experiences indicate that services are under-resourced to address the holistic and integrated supportive care needs of women affected by cancer across both maternity and cancer care teams.

The relationship between quality of life and some mental problems in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM): a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Women with medical problems during pregnancy, including women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), experience an increased prevalence of mental health disorders which can affect their quality of life. This study aimed to assess the relationship between GDM-related quality of life and depression, anxiety, and stress.

METHODS

This analytical cross-sectional study was performed on 150 women with GDM. The participants were selected using a multi-stage sampling including quota and then randomized method from maternal care centers affiliated with Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran-Iran. The data were collected using a personal information questionnaire, the GDM-related quality of life questionnaire (GDMQoL-36), and the depression, anxiety, and stress scale (DASS). The data were analyzed using SPSS-23 software and statistical tests of coefficient Spearman's correlation, t-test, analysis of variance, and multiple linear regression.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD score for the GDM-related quality of life and the DASS scale were 55.51 ± 8.87 and 27.12 ± 19.43%, respectively. Different degrees of depression, anxiety, and stress were present in 40, 61.3, and 42% of women, respectively. The total score of GDM-related quality of life had a significant negative correlation with the total score of DASS and the scores of the subscales including depression, anxiety, and stress (P < 0.001). There were significant correlations between the total score of GDM-related quality of life with age, BMI, length of marriage, educational level of the woman and her spouse, the occupation of the woman and her spouse, income, and economic class of the family. Multiple linear regression revealed that depression, education, and job are predictive factors for GDM-related quality of life.

CONCLUSION

GDM-related quality of life is related to some mental disorders. Therefore, it is important to consider the mental health promotion of pregnant women with GDM in future prenatal health programs to improve their quality of life. This also shows the importance of integrating mental health promotion strategies to enhance the quality of life of pregnant women with GDM.

Diabetes in pregnancy: Women's views of care in a multi-ethnic, low socioeconomic population with midwifery continuity-of-care

BACKGROUND

Diabetes in pregnancy is diagnosed in 6% of pregnancies annually in Aotearoa-New Zealand, disproportionately affecting multi-ethnic, low socio-economic women. Little is known about the care experience of this population within the model of midwifery continuity-of-care, including views of telehealth care.

AIM

Increase understanding of the experience of diabetes in pregnancy care, including telehealth, among multi-ethnic, low socio-economic women receiving midwifery continuity-of-care.

METHODS

Qualitative interview study with primarily indigenous and migrant women who had diabetes in pregnancy and gave birth 6-18 months previously. Interviewers were matched with participants by ethnicity. Transcripts were analysed using Framework analysis.

RESULTS

Participants were 19 women (5 Māori, 5 Pacific Peoples, 5 Asian, 4 European). Data analysis revealed three key themes: 1) 'shock, shame, and adjustment' to the diagnosis 2) 'learning to manage diabetes in pregnancy' and 3) 'preparation for birth and beyond' to the postpartum period.

DISCUSSION

Receiving the diagnosis of diabetes in pregnancy was a shock. Managing diabetes during pregnancy was particularly challenging for indigenous and migrant women, who wished for better access to culturally appropriate dietary and lifestyle information. Women appreciated having options of telehealth and face-to-face consultations. Preparation for birth and postpartum diabetes follow-up were areas requiring significant improvement. Challenges were mitigated through care from a consistent diabetes specialist midwife and community-based midwifery continuity-of-care.

CONCLUSION

Midwives were the backbone of diabetes in pregnancy care for this multi-ethnic, low socio-economic population. Care could be improved with more culturally appropriate diet and lifestyle information, better birth preparation, and expanded postpartum diabetes support.

The impact of regional origin on the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus in a multiethnic European cohort

Introduction

Women with migration background present specific challenges related to risk stratification and care of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Therefore, this study aims to investigate the role of ethnic origin on the risk of developing GDM in a multiethnic European cohort.

Methods

Pregnant women were included at a median gestational age of 12.9 weeks and assigned to the geographical regions of origin: Caucasian Europe (n = 731), Middle East and North Africa countries (MENA, n = 195), Asia (n = 127) and Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA, n = 48). At the time of recruitment maternal characteristics, glucometabolic parameters and dietary habits were assessed. An oral glucose tolerance test was performed in mid-gestation for GDM diagnosis.

Results

Mothers with Caucasian ancestry were older and had higher blood pressure and an adverse lipoprotein profile as compared to non-Caucasian mothers, whereas non-Caucasian women (especially those from MENA countries) had a higher BMI and were more insulin resistant. Moreover, we found distinct dietary habits. Non-Caucasian mothers, especially those from MENA and Asian countries, had increased incidence of GDM as compared to the Caucasian population (OR 1.87, 95%CI 1.40 to 2.52, p < 0.001). Early gestational fasting glucose and insulin sensitivity were consistent risk factors across different ethnic populations, however, pregestational BMI was of particular importance in Asian mothers.

Discussion

Prevalence of GDM was higher among women from MENA and Asian countries, who already showed adverse glucometabolic profiles at early gestation. Fasting glucose and early gestational insulin resistance (as well as higher BMI in women from Asia) were identified as important risk factors in Caucasian and non-Caucasian patients.

Promoting breastfeeding in women with gestational diabetes mellitus in high-income settings: an integrative review

BACKGROUND

Breastfeeding provides many short- and long-term health benefits for mothers and their infants and is a particularly relevant strategy for women who experience Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) during pregnancy. However, breastfeeding rates are generally lower amongst this group of women than the general population. This review's objective is to identify the factors that influence breastfeeding by exploring the experiences and outcomes of women in in high-income health care contexts when there is a history of GDM in the corresponding pregnancy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search strategy explored the electronic databases Medline, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus for primary studies exploring breastfeeding practices for papers published between January 2011 and June 2023. All papers were screened independently by two researchers with included papers assessed using the Crowe Critical Appraisal tool. Findings were analysed using a narrative synthesis framework.

RESULTS

From an initial search result of 1037 papers, 16 papers representing five high-income nations were included in this review for analysis - the United States of America (n = 10), Australia (n = 3), Finland (n = 1), Norway (n = 1), and Israel (n = 1). Fifteen papers used a quantitative design, and one used a qualitative design. The total number of participants represented in the papers is 963,718 of which 812,052 had GDM and 151,666 did not. Women with an immediate history of GDM were as likely to initiate breastfeeding as those without it. However, they were more likely to have the first feed delayed, be offered supplementation, experience delayed lactogenesis II and or a perception of low supply. Women were less likely to exclusively breastfeed and more likely to completely wean earlier than the general population. Maternity care practices, maternal factors, family influences, and determinants of health were contextual and acted as either a facilitator or barrier for this group.

CONCLUSION

Breastfeeding education and support need to be tailored to recognise the individual needs and challenges of women with a history of GDM. Interventions, including the introduction of commercial milk formula (CMF) may have an even greater impact and needs to be very carefully considered. Supportive strategies should encompass the immediate and extended family who are major sources of influence.

Latent profile analysis and influencing factors of quality of life in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) negatively affects the quality of life of pregnant women and is influenced by several factors. Research to date treats pregnant women with gestational diabetes as a homogeneous group based on their quality of life. We attempted to identify subgroups based on self-reported quality of life and explored variables associated with subgroups.

METHODS

From September 1, 2020 to November 29, 2020, pregnant women with GDM from two hospitals in Guangdong Province were selected as subjects by convenience sampling method. Medical records provided sociodemographic data, duration of GDM, pregnancy status, and family history of diabetes. Participants completed validated questionnaires for quality of life, anxiety and depression. Latent profile analysis was used to identify profiles of quality of life in pregnant women with GDM, and then a mixed regression method was used to analyze the influencing factors of different profiles.

RESULTS

A total of 279 valid questionnaires were collected. The results of the latent profile analysis showed that the quality of life of pregnant women with GDM could be divided into two profiles: C1 "high worry-high support" group (75.6%) and C2 "low worry-low support" group (24.4%). Daily exercise duration and depression degree are negative influencing factors, making it easier to enter the C1 group (p < 0.05). Disease duration and family history of diabetes are positive influencing factors, making it easier to enter the C2 group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The quality of life of pregnant women with GDM had obvious classification characteristics. Pregnant women with exercise habits and depression are more likely to enter the "high worry-high support" group, and health care providers should guide their exercise according to exercise guidelines during pregnancy and strengthen psychological intervention. Pregnant women with a family history of diabetes and a longer duration of the disease are more likely to fall into the "low worry-low support" group. Healthcare providers can strengthen health education for them and improve their disease self-management abilities.