BALATON and COMINO: Phase III Randomized Clinical Trials of Faricimab for Retinal Vein Occlusion: Study Design and Rationale

Switching to Faricimab in Therapy-Resistant Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion: Initial Real-World Efficacy Outcomes

Background/Objectives: Macular edema (ME), due to retinal vein occlusion (RVO), is a major cause of vision impairment. Many patients experience suboptimal responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monotherapy, necessitating alternative treatment approaches. Faricimab, a bispecific antibody targeting VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), introduces a novel dual-mechanism therapy. This study evaluates the short-term real-world efficacy of switching to Faricimab in patients with treatment-resistant ME secondary to RVO. Methods: This retrospective study included patients from LMU University Hospital who were switched to Faricimab due to an inadequate response or adverse events related to prior intravitreal therapy (Ranibizumab, Aflibercept, or OzurdexTM). All patients completed a structured loading phase of four monthly injections. Key outcome measures included changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), central subfield thickness (CST, µm), and intraretinal fluid (IRF) presence on optical coherence tomography (OCT). Changes were assessed from baseline (mo0) to three months (mo3). Results: The study included 19 eyes from 19 patients (mean age 63.0 ± 14.2 years). BCVA improved from 0.20 logMAR at baseline to 0.00 logMAR at mo3 (p < 0.01). CST decreased from 325 µm to 280 µm (p < 0.01). The proportion of eyes with IRF reduced from 100% to 32% (p < 0.01). Significant reductions in retinal volume within the 1 mm and 6 mm (both p < 0.01) circles of the ETDRS grid were observed. Conclusions: Switching to Faricimab in patients resulted in significant short-term improvements in BCVA, CST, and IRF resolution. Given the small sample size and retrospective design, these findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term efficacy and optimal treatment regimens.

Faricimab maintains substance integrity and sterility after compounding and storage in two different polypropylene syringe types

BACKGROUND

Compounding and storage of intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents in syringes is commonly performed in an off-label manner. However, the preservation of compound integrity and microbiological safety must be guaranteed. The aim of this study was to compare the chemical and physical stability, sterility and binding affinity to vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) of faricimab, a novel bispecific anti-VEGF/Ang-2 biologic, after compounding and storage in two different polypropylene syringe types for up to 28 days.

METHODS

Faricimab was compounded into silicone oil-free and silicone oil-containing polypropylene syringes under controlled aseptic clean room conditions and stored under light protection at 2-8 °C for up to 28 days. Compound integrity was analysed by size exclusion chromatography, nano differential scanning fluorimetry, UV-vis and dynamic light scattering. The analysis of the simultaneous binding of VEGF and Ang-2 was performed by grating-coupled interferometry. Additionally, samples were tested for sterility and presence of bacterial endotoxins. One-way ANOVA test was used to analyse statistical significance (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

No significant differences in VEGF and ANG-2 binding affinity were found in faricimab samples stored in either syringe type after 28 days compared to control. Chemical and physical stability testing revealed no statistically significant variation. Furthermore, sterility and the absence of bacterial endotoxins could be maintained.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirm the pharmaceutical safety of compounded faricimab after storage for up to 28 days. This may facilitate a cost-effective off-label use of faricimab in clinical practice while maintaining safety in the treatment of patients.

Faricimab Treat-and-Extend Dosing for Macular Edema Due to Retinal Vein Occlusion: 72-Week Results from the BALATON and COMINO Trials

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy, durability, and safety of dual angiopoietin-2/VEGF inhibition with faricimab dosed per a modified treat-and-extend-based regimen in patients with retinal vein occlusion.

DESIGN

Single-arm treatment period after a randomized, double-masked, active comparator-controlled period in the phase III BALATON/COMINO (NCT04740905/NCT04740931) trials.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with treatment-naïve foveal center-involved macular edema due to branch (BALATON; N = 553) or central/hemiretinal (COMINO; N = 729) retinal vein occlusion.

METHODS

Patients randomized to faricimab 6.0 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) or aflibercept 2.0 mg Q4W up to week 20 received faricimab 6.0 mg dosed per a modified treat-and-extend-based regimen from week 24 to 72. The dosing frequency was adjusted from Q4W to Q16W based on changes in central subfield thickness (CST) and best-corrected visual acuity.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change from baseline through week 72 in best-corrected visual acuity and CST; durability and safety through week 72.

RESULTS

Visual acuity gains and CST reductions achieved at week 24 were maintained through week 72. Adjusted mean best-corrected visual acuity (95.03% confidence interval [CI]) changes from baseline averaged over weeks 64, 68, and 72 in the prior faricimab Q4W and prior aflibercept Q4W arms were +18.1 letters (16.9-19.4) and +18.8 letters (17.5-20.0), respectively, in BALATON and +16.9 letters (15.2-18.6) and +17.1 letters (15.4-18.8), respectively, in COMINO. Adjusted mean (95.03% CI) CST changes from baseline averaged over weeks 64, 68, and 72 in the prior faricimab Q4W and prior aflibercept Q4W arms were -310.9 μm (-315.6 to -306.3) and -307.0 μm (-311.7 to -302.3), respectively, in BALATON and -465.9 μm (-472.5 to -459.3) and -460.6 μm (-467.2 to -453.9), respectively, in COMINO. In the prior faricimab Q4W and prior aflibercept Q4W arms, 64.1% and 56.9% of patients from BALATON and 45.5% and 50.1% from COMINO, respectively, were on ≥Q12W dosing at week 68. Faricimab continued to be well tolerated from weeks 24 to 72; the safety profile was consistent with that established for diabetic macular edema and neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings support the sustained efficacy and safety of faricimab in patients with macular edema due to retinal vein occlusion up to 72 weeks, with the potential for reduced treatment burden due to response durability.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Emerging clinical evidence of a dual role for Ang-2 and VEGF-A blockade with faricimab in retinal diseases

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapies have transformed the treatment of retinal diseases. However, VEGF signaling is only one component of the complex, multifactorial pathophysiology of retinal diseases, and many patients have residual disease activity despite ongoing anti-VEGF treatment. The angiopoietin/tyrosine kinase with immunoglobulin and epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (Ang/Tie2) signaling pathway is critical to endothelial cell homeostasis, survival, integrity, and vascular stability. Ang-2 can interfere with Ang-1/Tie2 signaling and is increased in several retinal diseases. Lack of Tie2 signaling due to elevated Ang-2 levels drives vascular instability through pericyte dropout, neovascularization, vascular leakage, inflammation, and fibrosis. Although Ang-2 and VEGF can synergistically promote vascular instability and neovascularization, Ang-2 may also mediate vascular instability independently of VEGF. Faricimab is a bispecific antibody designed for intraocular use that inhibits two distinct pathways via Ang-2 and VEGF-A blockade. Clinical biomarkers of vascular instability are important for evaluating disease control and subsequent treatment decisions. These biomarkers include measurement/evaluation with optical coherence tomography (OCT) of intraretinal fluid, subretinal fluid, central subfield thickness, and pigment epithelial detachments (PEDs), and fluorescein angiography imaging of macular leakage and PEDs. Hyperreflective foci (HRF), thought to be representative of activated microglia, indicating an inflammatory microenvironment, and epiretinal membranes (ERMs), a marker for retinal fibrotic proliferation in diabetic macular edema (DME), are both also identified using OCT. Here we summarize data (secondary endpoint and prespecified exploratory analyses as well as post hoc analyses) from six Phase III trials suggest that dual therapy Ang-2/VEGF-A inhibition with faricimab (6 mg) has a greater effect on reducing/resolving biomarkers of vascular instability than aflibercept (2 mg), by both controlling neovascularization and vascular leakage (with resultant resolution of exudation associated with DME, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, and retinal vein occlusion), as well as by targeting inflammation (reduction of HRF in DME) and retinal fibrotic proliferation (reducing the risk of ERMs in eyes with DME). Modulation of both the Ang-2 and VEGF-A pathways with faricimab may therefore provide greater disease control than anti-VEGF monotherapy, potentially leading to extended treatment durability and improved long-term outcomes.

Integrated Assessment of OCT, Multimodal Imaging, and Cytokine Markers for Predicting Treatment Responses in Retinal Vein Occlusion Associated Macular Edema: A Comparative Review of Anti-VEGF and Steroid Therapies

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is a significant cause of vision loss, characterized by the occlusion of retinal veins, leading to conditions such as central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) and branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO). Macular edema (ME), a prevalent consequence of RVO, is the primary cause of vision impairment in affected patients. Anti-VEGF agents have become the standard treatment, showing efficacy in improving visual acuity (VA) and reducing ME. However, a subset of patients exhibit a suboptimal response to anti-VEGF therapy, necessitating alternative treatments. Corticosteroids, which address inflammatory pathways implicated in ME, have shown promise, particularly in cases resistant to anti-VEGF. This review aims to identify biomarkers that predict treatment response to corticosteroids in RVO-associated ME, utilizing multimodal imaging and cytokine assessments. Baseline imaging, including SD-OCT and OCT-A, is essential for evaluating biomarkers like hyperreflective foci (HRF), serous retinal detachment (SRF), and central retinal thickness (CRT). Elevated cytokine levels, such as IL-6 and MCP-1, correlate with ME severity and poor anti-VEGF response. Early identification of these biomarkers can guide timely transitions to corticosteroid therapy, potentially enhancing treatment outcomes. The practical conclusion of this review is that integrating biomarker assessment into clinical practice enables personalized treatment decisions, allowing for earlier and more effective management of RVO-associated ME by transitioning patients to corticosteroid therapy when anti-VEGF agents are insufficient. Advanced diagnostics and machine learning may further refine personalized treatment strategies, improving the management of RVO-associated ME.

The protective effect of anti-VEGF-A/Ang-2 bispecific antibody on retinal vein occlusion model mice

(233/250) Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) causes macular edema and retinal ischemia resulting in visual field and vision loss. A bispecific antibody that blocks VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) has been recently launched and applied clinically to treat macular edema, but the role of Ang-2 in the pathogenesis of RVO is still unclear. In this study, we investigated the effects of the anti-VEGF-A/anti-Ang-2 bispecific antibody (BsAb) in a murine RVO model. By using RVO model mice, the expression of Ang-2 gene and protein was examined in the retina through real-time qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. A significant increase in Ang-2 was detected 1 day after occlusion. Immediately after occlusion, control IgG 400 μg/mL, anti-VEGF-A antibody 200 μg/mL, anti-Ang-2 antibody 200 μg/mL, and BsAb 400 μg/mL were intravitreally administered at 2 μL. Visual function was examined using electroretinograms, and apoptosis was examined using TUNEL staining. Interestingly, BsAb partially suppressed the decrease in amplitude of a and b waves compared to control IgG. Anti-Ang-2 antibody and BsAb reduced apoptosis-positive cells 1 day after occlusion. Comprehensive gene expression profiles were also examined using RNA sequencing analysis. RNA sequencing analysis of the retinal tissues showed that BsAb suppressed expression of gene groups associated with inflammatory response and vascular development compared to anti-VEGF-A antibody. Taken together, higher expression of Ang-2 contributes to the pathophysiology of RVO, providing a possible mechanism for the efficacy of BsAb in suppressing retinal dysfunction in RVO.

Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of retinal vein occlusion

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To assess the methodological quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPG) for the diagnosis and management of Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO).

METHODS

A systematic review of CPGs for the diagnosis and management of RVO was carried out with a search in databases, metasearch engines, CPG development institutions, ophthalmology associations and CPG repositories until April 2022. Search update was performed on April 2023, with no new record available. Five CPGs published in the last 10 years in English/Spanish were selected, and 5 authors evaluated them independently, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-II) instrument. An individual assessment of each CPG by domain (AGREE-II), an overall assessment of the guide, and its use with or without modifications were performed. Additionally, a meta-synthesis of the recommendations for the most relevant outcomes was carried out.

RESULTS

The lowest score (mean 18.8%) was for domain 5 'applicability', and the highest score (mean 62%) was for domain 4 'clarity of presentation'. The 2019 American guideline (PPP) presented the best score (40.4%) in domain 3 'rigour of development'. When evaluating the overall quality of the CPGs analysed, all CPGs could be recommended with modifications. In the meta-synthesis, anti-VEGF therapy is the first-choice therapy for macular oedema associated with RVO, but there is no clear recommendation about the type of anti-VEGF therapy to choose. Recommendations for diagnosis and follow-up are similar among the CPGs appraised.

CONCLUSION

Most CPGs for the diagnosis and management of RVO have a low methodological quality assessed according to the AGREE-II. PPP has the higher score in the domain 'rigour of development'. Among the CPGs appraised, there is no clear recommendation on the type of anti-VEGF therapy to choose.

A pivotal decade for bispecific antibodies?

Bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) are a class of antibodies that can mediate novel mechanisms of action compared to monospecific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). Since the discovery of mAbs and their adoption as therapeutic agents in the 1980s and 1990s, the development of bsAbs has held substantial appeal. Nevertheless, only three bsAbs (catumaxomab, blinatumomab, emicizumab) were approved through the end of 2020. However, since then, 11 bsAbs received regulatory agency approvals, of which nine (amivantamab, tebentafusp, mosunetuzumab, cadonilimab, teclistamab, glofitamab, epcoritamab, talquetamab, elranatamab) were approved for the treatment of cancer and two (faricimab, ozoralizumab) in non-oncology indications. Notably, of the 13 currently approved bsAbs, two, emicizumab and faricimab, have achieved blockbuster status, showing the promise of this novel class of therapeutics. In the 2020s, the approval of additional bsAbs can be expected in hematological malignancies, solid tumors and non-oncology indications, establishing bsAbs as essential part of the therapeutic armamentarium.

Novel pharmaceuticals for the management of retinal vein occlusion and linked disorders

INTRODUCTION

Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) is the second leading cause of blindness from retinal vascular disease behind diabetic retinopathy. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and glucocorticoid therapy are the cornerstones of pharmaceutical treatment for RVO. There is considerable interest in developing new pharmaceuticals in and out of these two classes to reduce costs, lower injection burden, and treat the occlusion itself, rather than the complications.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss novel pharmaceuticals for the treatment of RVO outside of current standard of care. We performed a comprehensive literature search encompassing pharmaceuticals that have recently been approved or have shown promising results in early clinical trials or animal models.

EXPERT OPINION

Anti-VEGF therapy remains the most efficacious treatment for RVO with a very favorable side effect profile. New biosimilars reduce costs while maintaining efficacy. Novel glucocorticoids may be a useful therapy in patients for whom anti-VEGF therapy has failed, or as an adjunct. Pharmaceuticals in other drug classes, particularly those with neuroprotective or regenerative properties, as well as those geared toward treating the occlusion itself, represent exciting options for early RVO therapy, but are likely years away from clinical relevance.