Macho-1 regulates unequal cell divisions independently of its function as a muscle determinant

Dynamic changes in the association between maternal mRNAs and endoplasmic reticulum during ascidian early embryogenesis

Axis formation is one of the most important events occurring at the beginning of animal development. In the ascidian egg, the antero-posterior axis is established at this time owing to a dynamic cytoplasmic movement called cytoplasmic and cortical reorganisation. During this movement, mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and maternal mRNAs (postplasmic/PEM RNAs) are translocated to the future posterior side. Although accumulating evidence indicates the crucial roles played by the asymmetrical localisation of these organelles and the translational regulation of postplasmic/PEM RNAs, the organisation of ER has not been described in sufficient detail to date owing to technical difficulties. In this study, we developed three different multiple staining protocols for visualising the ER in combination with mitochondria, microtubules, or mRNAs in whole-mount specimens. We defined the internally expanded “dense ER” using these protocols and described cisterna-like structures of the dense ER using focused ion beam-scanning electron microscopy. Most importantly, we described the dynamic changes in the colocalisation of postplasmic/PEM mRNAs and dense ER; for example, macho-1 mRNA was detached and excluded from the dense ER during the second phase of ooplasmic movements. These detailed descriptions of the association between maternal mRNA and ER can provide clues for understanding the translational regulation mechanisms underlying axis determination during ascidian early embryogenesis.

H3K27me3 suppresses sister-lineage somatic gene expression in late embryonic germline cells of the ascidian, Halocynthia roretzi

Protection of the germline from somatic differentiation programs is crucial for germ cell development. In many animals, whose germline development relies on the maternally inherited germ plasm, such protection in particular at early stages of embryogenesis is achieved by maternally localized global transcriptional repressors, such as PIE-1 of Caenorhabditis elegans, Pgc of Drosophila melanogaster and Pem of ascidians. However, zygotic gene expression starts in later germline cells eventually and mechanisms by which somatic gene expression is selectively kept under repression in the transcriptionally active cells are poorly understood. By using the ascidian species Halocynthia roretzi, we found that H3K27me3, a repressive transcription-related chromatin mark, became enriched in germline cells starting at the 64-cell stage when Pem protein level and its contribution to transcriptional repression decrease. Interestingly, inhibition of H3K27me3 together with Pem knockdown resulted in ectopic expression in germline cells of muscle developmental genes Muscle actin (MA4) and Snail, and of Clone 22 (which is expressed in all somatic but not germline cells), but not of other tissue-specific genes such as the notochord gene Brachyury, the nerve cord marker ETR-1 and a heart precursor gene Mesp, at the 110-cell stage. Importantly, these ectopically expressed genes are normally expressed in the germline sister cells (B7.5), the last somatic lineage separated from the germline. Also, the ectopic expression of MA4 was dependent on a maternally localized muscle determinant Macho-1. Taken together, we propose that H3K27me3 may be responsible for selective transcriptional repression for somatic genes in later germline cells in Halocynthia embryos and that the preferential repression of germline sister-lineage genes may be related to the mechanism of germline segregation in ascidian embryos, where the germline is segregated progressively by successive asymmetric cell divisions during cell cleavage stages. Together with findings from C. elegans and D. melanogaster, our data for this urochordate animal support the proposal for a mechanism, conserved widely throughout the animal kingdom, where germline transcriptional repression is mediated initially by maternally localized factors and subsequently by a chromatin-based mechanism.

Asymmetric and Unequal Cell Divisions in Ascidian Embryos

Asymmetric cell division during embryogenesis contributes to cell diversity by generating daughter cells that adopt distinct developmental fates. In this chapter, we summarize current knowledge of three examples of asymmetric cell division occurring in ascidian early embryos: (1) Three successive cell divisions that are asymmetric in terms of cell fate and unequal in cell size in the germline lineage at the embryo posterior pole. A subcellular structure, the centrosome-attracting body (CAB), and maternal PEM mRNAs localized within it control both the positioning of the cell division planes and segregation of the germ cell fates. (2) Asymmetric cell divisions involving endoderm and mesoderm germ layer separation. Asymmetric partitioning of zygotically expressed mRNA for Not, a homeodomain transcription factor, promotes the mesoderm fate and suppresses the endoderm fate. This asymmetric partitioning is mediated by transient nuclear migration toward the mesodermal pole of the mother cell, where the mRNA is delivered. In this case, there is no special regulation of cleavage plane orientation. (3) Asymmetric cell divisions in the marginal region of the vegetal hemisphere. The directed extracellular FGF and ephrin signals polarize the mother cells, inducing distinct fates in a pair of daughter cells (nerve versus notochord and mesenchyme versus muscle). The directions of cell division are regulated and oriented but independently of FGF and ephrin signaling. In these examples, polarization of the mother cells is facilitated by localized maternal factors, by delivery of transcripts from the nucleus to one pole of each cell, and by directed extracellular signals. Two cellular processes-asymmetric fate allocation and orientation of the cell division plane-are coupled by a single factor in the first example, but these processes are regulated independently in the third example. Thus, various modes of asymmetric cell division operate even at the early developmental stages in this single type of organism.

Multiplicity of Buc copies in Atlantic salmon contrasts with loss of the germ cell determinant in primates, rodents and axolotl

BACKGROUND

The primordial germ cells (PGCs) giving rise to gametes are determined by two different mechanisms in vertebrates. While the germ cell fate in mammals and salamanders is induced by zygotic signals, maternally delivered germ cell determinants specify the PGCs in birds, frogs and teleost fish. Assembly of the germ plasm in the oocyte is organized by the single Buc in zebrafish, named Velo1 in Xenopus, and by Oskar in Drosophila. Secondary loss of oskar in several insect lineages coincides with changes in germline determination strategies, while the presence of buc in mammals suggests functions not associated with germline formation.

RESULTS

To clarify the evolutionary history of buc we searched for the gene in genomes available from various chordates. No buc sequence was found in lamprey and chordate invertebrates, while the gene was identified in a conserved syntenic region in elephant shark, spotted gar, teleosts, Comoran coelacanth and most tetrapods. Rodents have probably lost the buc gene, while a premature translation stop was found in primates and in Mexican axolotl lacking germ plasm. In contrast, several buc and buc-like (bucL) paralogs were identified in the teleosts examined, including zebrafish, and the tetraploid genome of Atlantic salmon harbors seven buc and bucL genes. Maternal salmon buc1a, buc2a and buc2b mRNAs were abundant in unfertilized eggs together with dnd and vasa mRNAs. Immunostained salmon Buc1a was restricted to cleavage furrows in 4-cell stage embryos similar to a fluorescent zebrafish Buc construct injected in salmon embryos. Salmon Buc1a and Buc2a localized together with DnD, Vasa and Dazl within the Balbiani body of early oocytes.

CONCLUSIONS

Buc probably originated more than 400 million years ago and might have played an ancestral role in assembling germ plasm. Functional redundancy or subfunctionalization of salmon Buc paralogs in germline formation is suggested by the maternally inherited mRNAs of three salmon buc genes, the localized Buc1a in the cleavage furrows and the distribution of Buc1a and Buc2a in the Balbiani body during oogenesis. The extra-ovarian expression of salmon buc genes and the presence of a second zebrafish bucL gene suggest additional functions not related to germ cell specification.

Physical association between a novel plasma-membrane structure and centrosome orients cell division

In the last mitotic division of the epidermal lineage in the ascidian embryo, the cells divide stereotypically along the anterior-posterior axis. During interphase, we found that a unique membrane structure invaginates from the posterior to the centre of the cell, in a microtubule-dependent manner. The invagination projects toward centrioles on the apical side of the nucleus and associates with one of them. Further, a cilium forms on the posterior side of the cell and its basal body remains associated with the invagination. A laser ablation experiment suggests that the invagination is under tensile force and promotes the posterior positioning of the centrosome. Finally, we showed that the orientation of the invaginations is coupled with the polarized dynamics of centrosome movements and the orientation of cell division. Based on these findings, we propose a model whereby this novel membrane structure orchestrates centrosome positioning and thus the orientation of cell division axis.

Cytoplasmic localization and reorganization in ascidian eggs: role of postplasmic/PEM RNAs in axis formation and fate determination

Localization of maternal molecules in eggs and embryos and cytoplasmic movements to relocalize them are fundamental for the orderly cellular and genetic processes during early embryogenesis. Ascidian embryos have been known as 'mosaic eggs' because of their autonomous differentiation abilities based on localized cell fate determinants. This review gives a historical overview of the concept of cytoplasmic localization, and then explains the key features such as ooplasmic movements and cell lineages that are essential to grasp the process of ascidian development mediated by localized determinant activities. These activities are partly executed by localized molecules named postplasmic/PEM RNAs, originating from approximately 50 genes, of which the muscle determinant, macho-1, is an example. The cortical domain containing these RNAs is relocalized to the posterior-vegetal region of the egg by cytoskeletal movements after fertilization, and plays crucial roles in axis formation and cell fate determination. The cortical domain contains endoplasmic reticulum and characteristic granules, and gives rise to a subcellular structure called the centrosome-attracting body (CAB), in which postplasmic/PEM RNAs are highly concentrated. The CAB is responsible for a series of unequal partitionings of the posterior-vegetal cytoplasmic domain and the postplasmic/PEM RNAs at the posterior pole during cleavage. Some components of this domain, which is rich in granules, are eventually inherited by prospective germline cells with particular postplasmic/PEM RNAs such as vasa. The postplasmic/PEM RNAs are classified into two groups according to their final cellular destinations and localization pathways. Localization of these RNAs is regulated by specific nucleotide sequences in the 3' untranslated regions (3'UTRs).

Abnormal expression of Nek2 and β-catenin in breast carcinoma: clinicopathological correlations

AIMS

NIMA-related kinase 2 (Nek2) and β-catenin are important centrosome regulatory factors. The aim of this study was to detect the possible disparity in their expression among normal breast tissue, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), concomitant ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), and pure DCIS, and to explore its correlation with clinicopathological factors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used immunohistochemistry to detect protein expression of Nek2 and β-catenin in breast cancer tissues from 60 cases of pure DCIS, 348 cases of IDC and 137 cases of concomitant DCIS with that in normal breast tissues from the same 137 concomitant DCIS patients as controls. As compared with normal tissue, expression of Nek2 and β-catenin in the cytoplasm was significantly increased in IDC and DCIS (P < 0.05), and variation in expression was also observed in different grades of IDC (P < 0.01). Also, cytoplasmic expression of Nek2 and and of β-catenin were correlated with each other in IDC and DCIS (P < 0.01). In addition, they were both related to Ki67 immunoreactivity (P < 0.05). Furthermore, our study also revealed a correlation between their expression and some clinicopathological factors. We found that Nek2 cytoplasmic expression was associated with grade and tumour size (P < 0.01) in IDC, whereas β-catenin cytomembrane expression showed significant variation with grades, TNM stages, lymphoid node status, oestrogen receptor status, and molecular subtype (P < 0.05); a difference in expression was also observed between IDC and DCIS (P < 0.05). Also, β-catenin cytoplasmic expression was associated with TNM stage (P < 0.05). Expression of Nek2 at the mRNA level was detected in 50 pairs of breast cancer specimens and matched normal tissues by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, and the result showed increased expression in IDC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that abnormal expression of Nek2 and β-catenin might be one of the mechanisms of tumorigenesis, especially of abnormal tumour proliferation. They may represent new potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

Bi-polarized translation of ascidian maternal mRNA determinant pem-1 associated with regulators of the translation machinery on cortical Endoplasmic Reticulum (cER)

Polarized cortical mRNA determinants such as maternal macho-1 and pem-1 in ascidians, like budding yeast mating factor ASH1 reside on the cER-mRNA domain a subdomain of cortical Endoplasmic Reticulum(ER) and are translated in its vicinity. Using high resolution imaging and isolated cortical fragments prepared from eggs and embryos we now find that macho-1 and pem-1 RNAs co-localize with phospho-protein regulators of translation initiation (MnK/4EBP/S6K). Translation of cortical pem-1 RNA follows its bi-polarized relocalization. About 10 min after fertilization or artificial activation with a calcium ionophore, PEM1 protein is detected in the vegetal cortex in the vicinity of pem-1 RNA. About 40 min after fertilization-when pem-1 RNA and P-MnK move to the posterior pole-PEM1 protein remains in place forming a network of cortical patches anchored at the level of the zygote plasma membrane before disappearing. Cortical PEM1 protein is detected again at the 4 cell stage in the posterior centrosome attracting body (CAB) region where the cER-mRNA domain harboring pem-1/P-MnK/P-4EBP/P-S6K is concentrated. Bi-polarized PEM1 protein signals are not detected when pem-1 morpholinos are injected into eggs or zygotes or when MnK is inhibited. We propose that localized translation of the pem-1 RNA determinant is triggered by the fertilization/calcium wave and that the process is controlled by phospho-protein regulators of translation initiation co-localized with the RNA determinant on a sub-domain of the cortical Endoplasmic Reticulum.

Polo-like kinase 1 is required for localization of Posterior End Mark protein to the centrosome-attracting body and unequal cleavages in ascidian embryos

In ascidian embryos, the posterior-localized maternal factor Posterior End Mark (PEM) is responsible for patterning embryos along the anterior-posterior axis with regard to both cleavage pattern involving unequal cell divisions and gene expression. Although PEM plays important roles in embryogenesis, its mechanism of action is still unclear because PEM has no known functional domain. In the present study, we explored the candidate of PEM partner proteins in Halocynthia roretzi using yeast two-hybrid screening. We isolated a homologue of Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1), a key regulator of cell division and highly conserved in eukaryotes, as the first potential binding partner of PEM. We biochemically confirmed that interaction occurred between the Plk1 and PEM proteins. Immunostaining showed that Plk1 protein concentrates in the centrosome-attracting body (CAB) at the posterior pole, where PEM protein is also localized. The CAB is a subcellular structure that plays an important role in generating the posterior cleavage pattern. Plk1 localization to the CAB was dependent on the cell cycle phases during unequal cleavage. Inhibition of Plk1 with specific drugs resulted in failure of the nucleus to migrate towards the posterior pole and formation of a microtubule bundle between the CAB and a centrosome, similarly to inhibition of PEM function, suggesting that both proteins are involved in the same process of unequal cleavages. This interrupted nuclear migration was rescued by overexpression of PEM. In Plk1-inhibited embryos, the localization of PEM protein to the CAB was impaired, indicating that Plk1 is required for appropriate localization of PEM.

Cell cycle in ascidian eggs and embryos

In ascidians the cell cycle machinery has been studied mainly in oocytes while ascidian embryos have been used to dissect the mechanism that controls asymmetric cell division (ACD). Here we overview the most specific and often exceptional points and events in cell cycle control in ascidian oocytes and early embryos. Mature stage IV eggs are arrested at metaphase I due to cytostatic factor (CSF). In vertebrates, unfertilized eggs are arrested at metaphase II by CSF. Meta II-CSF is mediated by the Mos/MEK/MAPK/Erp1 pathway, which inhibits the ubiquitin ligase APC/C(cdc20) preventing cyclin B destruction thus stabilizing MPF activity. CSF is inactivated by the fertilization Ca(2+) transient that stimulates the destruction of Erp1 thus releasing APC/C(cdc20) from inhibition. Although many of the components of CSF are conserved between the ascidian and the vertebrates, the lack of Erp1 in the ascidians (and indeed other invertebrates) is notable since the Mos/MAPK pathway nonetheless mediates Meta I-CSF. Moreover, since the fertilization Ca(2+) transient targets Erp1, it is not clear how the sperm-triggered Ca(2+) transient in ascidians (and again other invertebrates) stimulates cyclin B destruction in the absence of Erp1. Nonetheless, like mammalian eggs, sperm trigger a series of Ca(2+) oscillations that increases the rate of cyclin B destruction and the subsequent loss of MAPK activity leading to meiotic exit in ascidians. Positive feedback from MPF maintains the Ca(2+) oscillations in fertilized ascidian eggs ensuring the eventual loss of MPF stimulating the egg-to-embryo transition. Embryonic cell cycles in the ascidian are highly stereotyped where both the rate of cell division and the orientation of cell division planes are precisely controlled. Three successive rounds of ACD generate two small posterior germ cell precursors at the 64 cell stage. The centrosome-attracting body (CAB) is a macroscopic cortical structure visible by light microscopy that causes these three rounds of ACD. Entry into mitosis activates the CAB causing the whole mitotic spindle to rotate and migrate toward the cortical CAB leading to a highly ACD whereby one small cell is formed that inherits the CAB and approximately 40 maternal postplasmic/PEM RNAs including the germ cell marker vasa.