All-cause mortality and SUDEP in a surgical epilepsy population

Reduced long-term mortality after successful resective epilepsy surgery: a population-based study

BACKGROUND

We investigated all-cause and epilepsy-related mortality in patients operated with resective epilepsy surgery and in non-operated patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Our hypothesis was that patients who proceed to surgery have lower mortality over time compared with non-operated patients.

METHOD

Data from 1329 adults and children from the Swedish National Epilepsy Surgery Register and 666 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who had undergone presurgical work-up but not been operated were analysed. The operated patients had follow-ups between 2 and 20 years. We used the Swedish Cause of Death Register to identify deaths. Autopsy reports were collected for patients with suspected sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for mortality and SUDEP.

RESULTS

SUDEP accounted for 30% of all deaths. Surgery was associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.9), also when adjusted for age, sex and tonic-clonic seizures at inclusion. The benefit of surgery seemed to persist and possibly even increase after 15 years of follow-up. Risk factors of mortality for operated patients were persisting seizures and living alone. Of the operated patients, 37% had seizures, and these had a higher risk of mortality (HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4 to 3.0) and SUDEP (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.7 to 7.3) compared with patients with seizure freedom at last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large population-based epilepsy surgery cohort, operated patients had a lower all-cause mortality compared with non-operated patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Seizure freedom was the most important beneficial factor for both all-cause mortality and SUDEP among operated patients.

Responsive neurostimulation for treatment of pediatric refractory epilepsy: A pooled analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is a complex medical condition often requiring resective surgery and/or some form of neurostimulation. In recent years responsive neurostimulation (RNS) has shown promising results in adult DRE, however there is a paucity of information regarding outcomes of RNS among pediatric patients treated with DRE. In this individual patient data meta-analysis (IPDMA) we seek to elucidate the effects RNS has on the pediatric population.

METHODS

Literature regarding management of pediatric DRE via RNS was reviewed in accordance with individual patient data meta-analysis guidelines. Four databases were searched with keywords ((Responsive neurostimulation) AND (epilepsy)) through December of 2022. From 1624 retrieved full text studies, 15 were ultimately included affording a pool of 98 individual participants.

RESULTS

The median age at implantation was 14 years (n = 95) with 42% of patients having undergone prior resective epilepsy surgery, 18% with prior vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), and 1% with prior RNS. At a median follow up time 12 months, median percent seizure reduction was 75% with 57% of patients achieving Engel Class < 2 outcome, 9.7% of which achieved seizure freedom. We report a postoperative complication rate of 8.4%, half of which were device-related infections. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-negative cases were negatively associated with magnitude of seizure reduction, and direct targeting techniques were associated with stronger treatment response when compared to other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

This review suggests RNS to be an effective treatment modality for pediatric patients with a postoperative complication rate comparable to that of RNS in adults. Investigation of prognostic clinical variables should be undertaken to augment patient selection. Last, multi-institutional prospective study of long-term effects of RNS on pediatric patients would stand to benefit clinicians in the management of pediatric DRE.

Epilepsy-Related Mortality After Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Patients With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this report was to study the incidence of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) after laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE).

METHODS

A prospective observational study of consecutive patients treated with LITT between 2013 and 2021 was conducted. The primary outcome was the occurrence of SUDEP during postoperative follow-up. Surgical outcome was classified according to the Engel scale.

RESULTS

There were 5 deaths, including 4 SUDEPs, among 135 patients with a median follow-up duration of 3.5 (range 0.1-9.0) years and a total of 501.3 person-years at risk. The estimated incidence of SUDEP was 8.0 (95% CI 2.2-20.4) per 1,000 person-years. Three SUDEPs occurred in patients with poor seizure outcomes, whereas 1 patient was seizure-free. Compared with pooled historical data, SUDEP occurred at a higher rate than in cohorts treated with resective surgery and at a rate similar to nonsurgical controls.

DISCUSSION

SUDEP occurred early and late after mesial temporal LITT. The SUDEP rate was comparable with rates reported in epilepsy surgery candidates who did not receive intervention. These findings reinforce targeting seizure freedom to decrease SUDEP risk, including early consideration for further intervention.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class IV evidence that LITT is not effective in reducing SUDEP incidence in patients with DRE.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: A critical view of the literature

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a sudden, unexpected, witnessed or unwitnessed, non-traumatic and non-drowning death, occurring in benign circumstances, in an individual with epilepsy, with or without evidence for a seizure and excluding documented status epilepticus in which postmortem examination does not reveal other causes of death. Lower diagnostic levels are assigned when cases met most or all of these criteria, but data suggested more than one possible cause of death. The incidence of SUDEP ranged from 0.09 to 2.4 per 1000 person-years. Differences can be attributed to the age of the study populations (with peaks in the 20-40-year age group) and the severity of the disease. Young age, disease severity (in particular, a history of generalized TCS), having symptomatic epilepsy, and the response to antiseizure medications (ASMs) are possible independent predictors of SUDEP. The pathophysiological mechanisms are not fully known due to the limited data available and because SUDEP is not always witnessed and has been electrophysiologically monitored only in a few cases with simultaneous assessment of respiratory, cardiac, and brain activity. The pathophysiological basis of SUDEP may vary according to different circumstances that make that particular seizure, in that specific moment and in that patient, a fatal event. The main hypothesized mechanisms, which could contribute to a cascade of events, are cardiac dysfunction (included potential effects of ASMs, genetically determined channelopathies, acquired heart diseases), respiratory dysfunction (included postictal arousal deficit for the respiratory mechanism, acquired respiratory diseases), neuromodulator dysfunction, postictal EEG depression and genetic factors.

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy during cenobamate clinical development

OBJECTIVE

We assessed mortality, sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), and standardized mortality ratio (SMR) among adults treated with cenobamate during the cenobamate clinical development program.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed deaths among all adults with uncontrolled focal (focal to bilateral tonic-clonic [FBTC], focal impaired awareness, focal aware) or primary generalized tonic-clonic (PGTC) seizures who received ≥1 dose of adjunctive cenobamate in completed and ongoing phase 2 and 3 clinical studies. In patients with focal seizures from completed studies, median baseline seizure frequencies ranged from 2.8 to 11 seizures per 28 days and median epilepsy duration ranged from 20 to 24 years. Total person-years included all days that a patient received cenobamate during completed studies or up to June 1, 2022, for ongoing studies. All deaths were evaluated by two epileptologists. All-cause mortality and SUDEP rates were expressed per 1000 person-years.

RESULTS

A total of 2132 patients (n = 2018 focal epilepsy; n = 114 idiopathic generalized epilepsy) were exposed to cenobamate for 5693 person-years. Approximately 60% of patients with focal seizures and all patients in the PGTC study had tonic-clonic seizures. A total of 23 deaths occurred (all in patients with focal epilepsy), for an all-cause mortality rate of 4.0 per 1000 person-years. Five cases of definite or probable SUDEP were identified, for a rate of .88 per 1000 person-years. Of the 23 overall deaths, 22 patients (96%) had FBTC seizures, and all 5 of the SUDEP patients had a history of FBTC seizures. The duration of exposure to cenobamate for patients with SUDEP ranged from 130 to 620 days. The SMR among cenobamate-treated patients in completed studies (5515 person-years of follow-up) was 1.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] .84-2.0), which was not significantly different from the general population.

SIGNIFICANCE

These data suggest that effective long-term medical treatment with cenobamate may reduce excess mortality associated with epilepsy.

Association between postictal EEG suppression, postictal autonomic dysfunction, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: Evidence from intracranial EEG

OBJECTIVE

The association between postictal electroencephalogram (EEG) suppression (PES), autonomic dysfunction, and Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) remains poorly understood. We compared PES on simultaneous intracranial and scalp-EEG and evaluated the association of PES with postictal heart rate variability (HRV) and SUDEP outcome.

METHODS

Convulsive seizures were analyzed in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy at 5 centers. Intracranial PES was quantified using the Hilbert transform. HRV was quantified using root mean square of successive differences of interbeat intervals, low-frequency to high-frequency power ratio, and RR-intervals.

RESULTS

There were 64 seizures from 63 patients without SUDEP and 11 seizures from 6 SUDEP patients. PES occurred in 99% and 87% of seizures on intracranial-EEG and scalp-EEG, respectively. Mean PES duration in intracranial and scalp-EEG was similar. Intracranial PES was regional (<90% of channels) in 46% of seizures; scalp PES was generalized in all seizures. Generalized PES showed greater decrease in postictal parasympathetic activity than regional PES. PES duration and extent were similar between patients with and without SUDEP.

CONCLUSIONS

Regional intracranial PES can be present despite scalp-EEG demonstrating generalized or no PES. Postictal autonomic dysfunction correlates with the extent of PES.

SIGNIFICANCE

Intracranial-EEG demonstrates changes in autonomic regulatory networks not seen on scalp-EEG.

Knowledge and awareness toward surgical treatment of epilepsy among medical students at Umm Al-Qura University

Objective

This study aims to evaluate knowledge and awareness toward surgical treatment of epilepsy among medical students at Umm Al-Qura University.

Methods

A survey composed of 10 questions was distributed to medical students concerning surgical neurological disorders. It was used to collect data from 401 samples. Questions addressed general knowledge of epilepsy surgery and drug-resistant epilepsy, students' attitude toward epilepsy surgery, and techniques. The chi-square test was utilized.

Results

The familiar surgical techniques were lobectomy (11.2%), followed by hemispherotomy (8.2%). The term "drug-resistant epilepsy" was known to 24.4%. More than half of the students 259 (64.6%) would refer patients with drug-resistant epilepsy to a neurosurgeon and neurologist, knowledge and awareness of epilepsy surgery were high for 30.7% of students. Statistically, significant relationship was observed between the level of awareness and academic years (p = 0.000131).

Conclusions

Medical students have a positive attitude toward epilepsy surgery. Students are less aware of drug resistance in epilepsy. Knowledge and awareness were better among students at higher levels. We conclude that highlighting the importance of epilepsy surgery should be continued. Moreover, additional educational effort should be invested in expressing the term drug-resistant epilepsy.

EEG as an indispensable tool during and after the COVID-19 pandemic: A review of tribulations and successes

During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, elective and non-emergent tests and procedures were delayed or suspended in lieu of diverting resources to more emergent treatment of critically ill patients and to avoid the spread and contraction of COVID-19. Further, the workforce was stretched thin, and healthcare facilities saw high turnover rates for full-time and contract employees, which strained the system and reduced the ability to provide clinical services. One of the casualties of these changes was electroencephalography (EEG) procedures, which have been performed less frequently throughout the world since the pandemic. Whether considered routine or emergent, the deferral of EEG studies can cause downstream effects, including a delay in diagnosis and initiation of treatment for epilepsy and non-epileptic seizures resulting in a higher risk of morbidity and mortality. Despite these limitations, the importance and utility of EEG and EEG technologists have been reinforced with the development of COVID-related neurological complications, including encephalopathy and seizures, which require EEG for diagnosis and treatment. Since the pandemic, reliance on remote telemonitoring has further highlighted the value and ease of using EEG. There has also been a heightened interest in rapid EEG devices that non-technologist professionals can attach quickly, allowing minimum patient contact to avoid exposure to COVID-19 and taking advantage of remote EEG monitoring. This review discusses the acute and potential long-term effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the use and performance of EEG.

Drug-resistant epilepsy and mortality-Why and when do neuromodulation and epilepsy surgery reduce overall mortality

Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy have an increased mortality rate, with the majority of deaths being epilepsy related and 40% due to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). The impact of epilepsy surgery on mortality has been investigated since the 1970s, with increased interest in this field during the past 15 years. We systematically reviewed studies investigating mortality rate in patients undergoing epilepsy surgery or neuromodulation therapies. The quality of available evidence proved heterogenous and often limited by significant methodological issues. Perioperative mortality following epilepsy surgery was found to be <1%. Meta-analysis of studies that directly compared patients who underwent surgery to those not operated following presurgical evaluation showed that the former have a two-fold lower risk of death and a three-fold lower risk of SUDEP compared to the latter (odds ratio [OR] 0.40, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29-0.56; p < .0001 for overall mortality and OR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.18-0.57; p < .001 for SUDEP). Limited data are available regarding the risk of death and SUDEP in patients undergoing neuromodulation therapies, although some evidence indicates that vagus nerve stimulation might be associated with a lower risk of SUDEP. Several key questions remain to be addressed in future studies, considering the need to better inform patients about the long-term benefit-risk ratio of epilepsy surgery. Dedicated long-term prospective studies will thus be required to provide more personalized information on the impact of surgery and/or neuromodulation on the risk of death and SUDEP.

Timing of referral to evaluate for epilepsy surgery: Expert Consensus Recommendations from the Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy

Epilepsy surgery is the treatment of choice for patients with drug-resistant seizures. A timely evaluation for surgical candidacy can be life-saving for patients who are identified as appropriate surgical candidates, and may also enhance the care of nonsurgical candidates through improvement in diagnosis, optimization of therapy, and treatment of comorbidities. Yet, referral for surgical evaluations is often delayed while palliative options are pursued, with significant adverse consequences due to increased morbidity and mortality associated with intractable epilepsy. The Surgical Therapies Commission of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) sought to address these clinical gaps and clarify when to initiate a surgical evaluation. We conducted a Delphi consensus process with 61 epileptologists, epilepsy neurosurgeons, neurologists, neuropsychiatrists, and neuropsychologists with a median of 22 years in practice, from 28 countries in all six ILAE world regions. After three rounds of Delphi surveys, evaluating 51 unique scenarios, we reached the following Expert Consensus Recommendations: (1) Referral for a surgical evaluation should be offered to every patient with drug-resistant epilepsy (up to 70 years of age), as soon as drug resistance is ascertained, regardless of epilepsy duration, sex, socioeconomic status, seizure type, epilepsy type (including epileptic encephalopathies), localization, and comorbidities (including severe psychiatric comorbidity like psychogenic nonepileptic seizures [PNES] or substance abuse) if patients are cooperative with management; (2) A surgical referral should be considered for older patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who have no surgical contraindication, and for patients (adults and children) who are seizure-free on 1-2 antiseizure medications (ASMs) but have a brain lesion in noneloquent cortex; and (3) referral for surgery should not be offered to patients with active substance abuse who are noncooperative with management. We present the Delphi consensus results leading up to these Expert Consensus Recommendations and discuss the data supporting our conclusions. High level evidence will be required to permit creation of clinical practice guidelines.

Practical considerations in epilepsy neurostimulation

Neuromodulation is a key therapeutic tool for clinicians managing patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. Multiple devices are available with long-term follow-up and real-world experience. The aim of this review is to give a practical summary of available neuromodulation techniques to guide the selection of modalities, focusing on patient selection for devices, common approaches and techniques for initiation of programming, and outpatient management issues. Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS), deep brain stimulation of the anterior nucleus of the thalamus (DBS-ANT), and responsive neurostimulation (RNS) are all supported by randomized controlled trials that show safety and a significant impact on seizure reduction, as well as a suggestion of reduction in the risk of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Significant seizure reductions are observed after 3 months for DBS, RNS, and VNS in randomized controlled trials, and efficacy appears to improve with time out to 7 to 10 years of follow-up for all modalities, albeit in uncontrolled follow-up or retrospective studies. A significant number of patients experience seizure-free intervals of 6 months or more with all three modalities. Number and location of epileptogenic foci are important factors affecting efficacy, and together with comorbidities such as severe mood or sleep disorders, may influence the choice of modality. Programming has evolved-DBS is typically initiated at lower current/voltage than used in the pivotal trial, whereas target charge density is lower with RNS, however generalizable optimal parameters are yet to be defined. Noninvasive brain stimulation is an emerging stimulation modality, although it is currently not used widely. In summary, clinical practice has evolved from those established in pivotal trials. Guidance is now available for clinicians who wish to expand their approach, and choice of neuromodulation technique may be tailored to individual patients based on their epilepsy characteristics, risk tolerance, and preferences.

Association Between Standardized Mortality Ratio and Utilization of Care in US Veterans With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy Compared With All US Veterans and the US General Population

Importance

Drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) is thought to be associated with increased mortality, but larger population-based studies are lacking. Additionally, the benefit of effective management in DRE lacks evidence.

Objective

To examine the association of utilization of care with mortality in US veterans with DRE.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Observational cohort study conducted between October 1, 2013, and March 31, 2020. Mortality statistics in US veterans with DRE were compared to the US general population and all veterans within the Veterans Health Administration. Epilepsy was defined as use of 1 or more antiseizure medications (ASMs) for 30 days or longer with a seizure diagnosis or 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient encounters with an epilepsy diagnosis. DRE was defined as the use of 2 or more ASMs. Among 9.6 million US veterans, 164 435 (1.7%) had epilepsy, of whom 55 571 (33.8%) had DRE. Epilepsy and DRE were administratively identified based on criteria noted in design. Identified participants were included for analysis.

Exposures

Veterans with DRE.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Standardized mortality ratio (SMR).

Results

Among US veterans with DRE, the mean (SD) age was 58.3 (15.4) years, and 49 430 individuals (88.9%) were male. Of ethnicity data gathered, 3170 individuals (5.7%) were Hispanic or Latino, 50 599 (91.1%) were not Hispanic or Latino, 842 (1.5%) declined to answer, and 960 (1.7%) were recorded as unknown. Of race data gathered, 516 individuals (0.9%) were American Indian or Alaskan Native, 270 (0.5%) were Asian, 11 316 (20.4%) were Black or African American, 587 (1.1%) were of multiple races, 453 (0.8%) were Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, 39 543 (71.2%) were White, 1697 (3.1%) declined to answer, and 1189 (2.1%) were recorded as unknown. SMR was 1.50 (95% CI, 1.47-1.53) compared with the US general population and 1.56 (95% CI, 1.53-1.59) compared with all veterans. Utilization rates were 81.1% (n = 45 057) for neurology clinic evaluation, 66.4% (n = 36 905) for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 49.6% (n = 27 546) for electroencephalography (EEG) testing. Only 8350 individuals (15.0%) had comprehensive epilepsy evaluations and 3357 (6.0%) had epilepsy monitoring. Multivariable analysis revealed an association between lower mortality and neurology clinic evaluation, EEG, MRI, epilepsy monitoring, and the use of more than 2 ASMs after adjusting for age and comorbidities.

Conclusions and Relevance

Mortality rates were significantly higher in US veterans with DRE compared to the general population. Better utilization of comprehensive epilepsy care, diagnostic services, and medications were each associated with reduced mortality. These findings indicate that appropriate management of DRE is critical in this population.

Frontal lobe hypometabolism associated with Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) risk: An objective PET study

OBJECTIVE

Abnormalities of brain structures and neuronal networks have been identified in MRI studies of patients with Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) as well as in those at elevated risk. The goal of this study was to identify common patterns of objectively detected brain glucose metabolic abnormalities associated with SUDEP patients and those at high SUDEP risk.

METHODS

Patients with refractory epilepsy (n = 78, age: 16-61 years, 44 females), who underwent comprehensive presurgical evaluation, were assessed for their risk of SUDEP using the revised SUDEP-7 inventory. From the 57 patients with low SUDEP risk, 35 were selected to match their demographic and clinical characteristics to those with high SUDEP risk (n = 21). [¹⁸F]fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) abnormalities were evaluated in the high- and low-SUDEP risk subgroups compared to FDG-PET scans of a healthy adult control group using statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Individual FDG-PET scans of 4 additional patients, who died from SUDEP, were also analyzed by SPM.

RESULTS

Mean SUDEP-7 score was 6.1 in the high and 2.7 in the low SUDEP risk group. MRI showed no lesion in 36 patients (64%). Statistical parametric mapping analysis of the high SUDEP risk subgroup showed bilateral medial frontal and inferior frontal hypometabolism as a common pattern. The low-risk group showed no specific common metabolic abnormalities on SPM group analysis. Individual PET scans of all 4 patients who died from SUDEP also showed bilateral frontal lobe hypometabolism.

CONCLUSIONS

These data show that bilateral frontal lobe involvement on FDG-PET, especially the medial and inferior frontal cortex, may be a common metabolic pattern associated with high SUDEP risk and SUDEP itself, in patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP): A Review of Risk Factors and Possible Interventions in Children

Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is a serious and devastating, yet poorly understood outcome in epilepsy. This review discusses the current knowledge and understanding of SUDEP in children and adolescents. Established risk factors for SUDEP include history of generalized tonic-clonic seizures and nocturnal seizures. Other proposed risk factors include the use of multiple antiseizure medications and poor medication adherence. Possible prevention strategies for SUDEP include improved medication adherence, surgical interventions, nighttime safety, seizure detection devices, and diet. Pediatric providers have a great opportunity to educate families about SUDEP, assess medication adherence, and provide families with tools to improve medication adherence and learn about SUDEP in children and adolescents with epilepsy. Future research in SUDEP aims to further understand the etiology and risk factors of SUDEP, while developing more intervention strategies to prevent SUDEP.

The role of convulsive seizures in SUDEP

Convulsive seizures are the most consistently reported risk factor for SUDEP. However, the precise mechanisms by which convulsive seizures trigger fatal cardiopulmonary changes are still unclear. Additionally, it is not clear why some seizures cause death when most do not. This article reviews the physiologic changes that occur during and after convulsive seizures and how these may contribute to SUDEP. Seizures activate specific cortical and subcortical regions that can cause potentially lethal cardiorespiratory changes. Clinical factors, including sleep state, medication treatment and withdrawal, positioning and posturing during seizures, and underlying structural or genetic conditions may also affect specific aspects of seizures that may contribute to SUDEP. While seizure control, either through medication or surgical treatment, is the primary intervention that reduces SUDEP risk, unfortunately, seizures cannot be fully controlled despite maximal treatment in a significant proportion of people with epilepsy. Thus specific interventions to prevent adverse seizure-related cardiopulmonary consequences are needed. The potential roles of repositioning/stimulation after seizures, oxygen supplementation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and clinical treatment options in reducing SUDEP risk are explored. Ultimately, understanding of these factors may lead to interventions that could reduce or prevent SUDEP.

The SANTÉ study at 10 years of follow-up: Effectiveness, safety, and sudden unexpected death in epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of deep brain anterior thalamus stimulation after 7 and 10 years, and report the incidence of sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) and overall mortality in adults in the Stimulation of the Anterior Nucleus of the Thalamus for Epilepsy (SANTÉ) study.

METHODS

After the 3-month blinded and 9-month unblinded phases, subjects continued to be assessed during long-term follow-up (LTFU) and later a continued therapy access phase (CAP), to further characterize adverse events and the incidence of SUDEP. Stimulus parameter and medication changes were allowed.

RESULTS

One hundred ten implanted subjects accumulated a total of 938 device-years of experience (69 subjects during the LTFU phase and 61 subjects in the CAP phase). Prior to study closure, 57 active subjects continued therapy at 14 study centers, with follow-up of at least 10 (maximum 14) years. At 7 years, median seizure frequency percent reduction from baseline was 75% (p < .001), with no outcome differences related to prior vagus nerve stimulation or resective surgery. The most severe seizure type, focal to bilateral tonic-clonic, was reduced by 71%. Adding new antiseizure medications did not impact the pattern of seizure reduction over time. There were no unanticipated serious adverse events in the study. The definite-plus-probable SUDEP rate, based on SANTÉ study experience (two deaths in 938 years) and previous pilot studies (0 deaths in 76 years), indicated a rate of 2.0 deaths for 1000 person-years. Overall mortality was 6.9 deaths per 1000 person-years.

SIGNIFICANCE

The long-term efficacy and safety profiles of the deep brain stimulation (DBS) system for epilepsy are favorable and demonstrate stable outcomes. Improvement in frequency of the most severe seizure type may reduce SUDEP risk. The SUDEP rate with DBS (2.0) is comparable to other neuromodulation treatments (i.e., vagus nerve stimulation, responsive neurostimulation) for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Mind the Gap: SUDEP in the United States

Socioeconomic Disparities in SUDEP in the US

Cihan E, Hesdorffer DC, Brandsoy M, et al. Neurology. 2020;94(24): e2555-e2566. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000009463

Objective:

To determine the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) rates.

Methods:

We queried all decedents presented for medicolegal investigation at 3 medical examiner offices across the country (New York City, Maryland, San Diego County) in 2009 to 2010 and 2014 to 2015. We identified all decedents for whom epilepsy/seizure was listed as cause/contributor to death or comorbid condition on the death certificate. We then reviewed all available reports. Decedents determined to have SUDEP were included for analysis. We used median income in the ZIP code of residence as a surrogate for SES. For each region, zip code regions were ranked by median household income and divided into quartiles based on total population for 2 time periods. Region-, age-, and income-adjusted epilepsy prevalence were estimated in each zip code. Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy rates in the highest and lowest SES quartiles were evaluated to determine disparity. Examined SUDEP rates in 2 time periods were also compared.

Results:

There were 159 and 43 SUDEP cases in the lowest and highest SES quartiles. Medical examiner–investigated SUDEP rate ratio between the lowest and highest SES quartiles was 2.6 (95% CI: 1.7-4.1, P < .0001) in 2009 to 2010 and 3.3 (95% CI: 1.9-6.0, P < .0001) in 2014 to 2015. There was a significant decline in overall SUDEP rate between the 2 study periods (36% decrease, 95% CI: 22%-48%, P < .0001).

Conclusion:

Medical examiner–investigated SUDEP incidence was significantly higher in people with the lowest SES compared to the highest SES. The difference persisted over a 5-year period despite decreased overall SUDEP rates.