Implications of second-look laparotomy in the context of optimally resected stage III ovarian cancer: a non-randomized comparison using an explanatory analysis: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study

Transforming ovarian cancer care by targeting minimal residual disease

Frontline treatment and resultant cure rates in patients with advanced ovarian cancer have changed little over the past several decades. Here, we outline a multidisciplinary approach aimed at gaining novel therapeutic insights by focusing on the poorly understood minimal residual disease phase of ovarian cancer that leads to eventual incurable recurrences.

Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Combined with Cytoreductive Surgery as Consolidation Therapy for Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer who undergo incomplete surgery followed by six cycles of chemotherapy could benefit from second-look or consolidation cytoreductive surgery (CCRS). The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the overall survival (OS) in patients undergoing complete CCRS and the factors affecting survival. The secondary goal was to study the benefit of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in these patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 173 patients with CCRS with (n = 118) or without (n = 55) HIPEC treated at 12 French centers. Only patients having a completeness of cytoreduction (CC) 0/1 resection and a minimum of 5 years of follow-up were included. HIPEC was performed systematically for all patients except those treated at the four centers that did not perform HIPEC.

RESULTS

The median Peritoneal Cancer Index was 6 (range 0-33). Closed HIPEC was performed in 59 (34.1%) patients and open HIPEC was performed in 56 (32.3%) patients. Grade 3-4 complications occurred in 64 (36.9%) patients. The median OS was 35.67 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 29.8-46.1) and was significantly longer for CCRS + HIPEC (31.4 months without HIPEC and 42.5 months with HIPEC; p = 0.022). On multivariate analysis, closed HIPEC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.46, 95% CI 0.29-0.73; p < 0.001) resulted in a longer OS, and age > 65 years (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.14-4.11; p = 0.018) and bowel resection (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.27-3.08; p = 0.020) led to a shorter OS. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, closed HIPEC (odds ratio 0.18; p = 0.001) was associated with a lower risk of dying at 5 years.

CONCLUSIONS

CCRS was performed with an acceptable morbidity and resulted in good overall survival. The role of HIPEC in addition to CCRS should be evaluated in prospective, randomized studies and the closed technique prospectively compared with the open technique.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Ovarian Neoplasms - What is Possible, What is Useful?

The use of minimally invasive surgical techniques is becoming increasingly important in gynecologic oncology due to technical advances and the increasing level of surgical expertise. In addition to laparoscopic approaches for the treatment of benign neoplasms, minimally invasive surgical methods have also become established in some areas for treating gynecologic malignancies. For tumor entities such as endometrial and cervical carcinoma, there are conclusive studies emphasizing the role of laparoscopy in surgical therapy. By contrast, due to a lack of prospective data with survival analyses, no clear conclusions can be drawn on the significance of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of ovarian carcinoma. However, some smaller, mostly retrospective case-control studies and cohort studies open the way for a discussion, positing the possibility that laparoscopic surgical procedures, particularly for early ovarian carcinoma, are technically feasible and of a quality equivalent to that of conventional longitudinal laparotomy, and may also be associated with lower perioperative morbidity. In this article we discuss the most important aspects of using minimally invasive surgical techniques for ovarian carcinoma based on the current literature. In particular we look at the relevance of laparoscopy as a primary approach for surgical staging of early ovarian carcinoma, and we evaluate the role of diagnostic laparoscopy in assessing the operability of advanced ovarian carcinoma.

Resveratrol Contrasts IL-6 Pro-Growth Effects and Promotes Autophagy-Mediated Cancer Cell Dormancy in 3D Ovarian Cancer: Role of miR-1305 and of Its Target ARH-I

Tumor dormancy is the extended period during which patients are asymptomatic before recurrence, and it represents a difficult phenomenon to target pharmacologically. The relapse of tumors, for instance arising from the interruption of dormant metastases, is frequently observed in ovarian cancer patients and determines poor survival. Inflammatory cytokines present in the tumor microenvironment likely contribute to such events. Cancer cell dormancy and autophagy are interconnected at the molecular level through ARH-I (DIRAS3) and BECLIN-1, two tumor suppressors often dysregulated in ovarian cancers. IL-6 disrupts autophagy in ovarian cancer cells via miRNAs downregulation of ARH-I, an effect contrasted by the nutraceutical protein restriction mimetic resveratrol (RV). By using three ovarian cancer cell lines with different genetic background in 2D and 3D models, the latter mimicking the growth of peritoneal metastases, we show that RV keeps the cancer cells in a dormant-like quiescent state contrasting the IL-6 growth-promoting activity. Mechanistically, this effect is mediated by BECLIN-1-dependent autophagy and relies on the availability of ARH-I. We also show that ARH-I (DIRAS3) is a bona fide target of miR-1305, a novel oncomiRNA upregulated by IL-6 and downregulated by RV. Clinically relevant, bioinformatic analysis of a transcriptomic database showed that the high expression of DIRAS3 and MAP1LC3B mRNAs together with that of CDKN1A, directing a cellular dormant phenotype, predicts better overall survival in ovarian cancer patients, and this correlates with MIR1305 downregulation. The possibility of maintaining a permanent cell dormancy in ovarian cancer by the chronic administration of RV should be considered as a therapeutic option to prevent the "awakening" of cancer cells in response to a permissive microenvironment, thus limiting the risk of tumor relapse and metastasis.

Elimination of dormant, autophagic ovarian cancer cells and xenografts through enhanced sensitivity to anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibition

BACKGROUND

Poor outcomes for patients with ovarian cancer relate to dormant, drug-resistant cancer cells that survive after primary surgery and chemotherapy. Ovarian cancer (OvCa) cells persist in poorly vascularized scars on the peritoneal surface and depend on autophagy to survive nutrient deprivation. The authors have sought drugs that target autophagic cancer cells selectively to eliminate residual disease.

METHODS

By using unbiased small-interfering RNA (siRNA) screens, the authors observed that knockdown of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) reduced the survival of autophagic OvCa cells. Small-molecule ALK inhibitors were evaluated for their selective toxicity against autophagic OvCa cell lines and xenografts. Autophagy was induced by reexpression of GTP-binding protein Di-Ras3 (DIRAS3) or serum starvation and was evaluated with Western blot analysis, fluorescence imaging, and transmission electron microscopy. Signaling pathways required for crizotinib-induced apoptosis of autophagic cells were explored with flow cytometric analysis, Western blot analysis, short-hairpin RNA knockdown of autophagic proteins, and small-molecule inhibitors of STAT3 and BCL-2.

RESULTS

Induction of autophagy by reexpression of DIRAS3 or serum starvation in multiple OvCa cell lines significantly reduced the 50% inhibitory concentration of crizotinib and other ALK inhibitors. In 2 human OvCa xenograft models, the DIRAS3-expressing tumors treated with crizotinib had significantly decreased tumor burden and long-term survival in 67% to 79% of mice. Crizotinib treatment of autophagic cancer cells further enhanced autophagy and induced autophagy-mediated apoptosis by decreasing phosphorylated STAT3 and BCL-2 signaling.

CONCLUSIONS

Crizotinib may eliminate dormant, autophagic, drug-resistant OvCa cells that remain after conventional cytoreductive surgery and combination chemotherapy. A clinical trial of ALK inhibitors as maintenance therapy after second-look operations should be seriously considered.

Intraperitoneal (IP) port cytology after completion of primary therapy for advanced stage ovarian cancer: A novel approach to a "second look"

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether IP port cytology predicts early recurrence and/or poor prognosis in patients with ovarian cancer who have completed primary therapy.

METHODS

A prospective study of patients with advanced stage ovarian cancer undergoing IP port removal after debulking followed by IV/IP chemotherapy was performed. Ports were flushed with 10 cc of normal saline into ThinPrep fixative to be analyzed for cytology. Results were correlated with clinical factors and cancer outcomes. Survivals were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using log-rank analysis.

RESULTS

Effluent from 53 IP ports was analyzed, and patients were followed for a median of 62 months. Mean age was 58.5, with the majority of patients being white (90%), with stage 3 (62%), serous histology (87%). Seven (13.2%) patients had positive IP cytology. POS and NEG groups were similar with regard to age, BMI, stage, grade, and GOG status. Patients with POS results had increased risk of recurrence HR 3.2 (95%CI 0.4, 28.9), and death HR 6.5 (95%CI 0.7, 58.8), and were more likely to recur before 12 months, 71% vs. 22% (p = 0.007). Compared to NEG, POS conferred a shorter median survival with PFS of 32 vs. 7 months (p = 0.02) and OS of 84 vs. 42 months (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

IP port cytology is predictive of recurrence and survival in patients with ovarian cancer. This inexpensive test may serve as an adjunct to imaging and tumor markers to determine disease status at the completion of treatment. Further study should investigate how this may impact management.

Applying Precision Medicine to Ovarian Cancer: Proof-of-Principle for a "Molecular Second Look"

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to assess if targeted investigation for tumor-specific mutations by ultradeep DNA sequencing of peritoneal washes of ovarian cancer patients after primary surgical debulking and chemotherapy, and clinically diagnosed as disease free, provides a more sensitive and specific method to assess actual treatment response and tailor future therapy and to compare this "molecular second look" with conventional cytology and histopathology-based findings.

METHODS/MATERIALS

We identified 10 patients with advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer who had undergone second-look laparoscopy and for whom DNA could be isolated from biobanked paired blood, primary and recurrent tumor, and second-look peritoneal washes. A targeted 56 gene cancer-relevant panel was used for next-generation sequencing (average coverage, >6500×). Mutations were validated using either digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) or Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

A total of 25 tumor-specific mutations were identified (median, 2/patient; range, 1-8). TP53 mutations were identified in at least 1 sample from all patients. All 5 pathology-based second-look positive patients were confirmed positive by molecular second look. Genetic analysis revealed that 3 of the 5 pathology-based negative second looks were actually positive. In the 2 patients, the second-look mutations were present in either the original primary or recurrent tumors. In the third, 2 high-frequency, novel frameshift mutations in MSH6 and HNF1A were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The molecular second look detects tumor-specific evidence of residual disease and provides genetic insight into tumor evolution and future recurrences beyond standard pathology. In the precision medicine era, detecting and genetically characterizing residual disease after standard treatment will be invaluable for improving patient outcomes.

1st Evidence-based Italian consensus conference on cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for peritoneal carcinosis from ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer (OC) remains relatively rare, although it is among the top 4 causes of cancer death for women younger than 50. The aggressive nature of the disease and its often late diagnosis with peritoneal involvement have an impact on prognosis. The current scientific literature presents ambiguous or uncertain indications for management of peritoneal carcinosis (PC) from OC, both owing to the lack of sufficient scientific data and their heterogeneity or lack of consistency. Therefore, the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology (SICO), the Italian Society of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, the Italian Association of Hospital Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, and the Italian Association of Medical Oncology conducted a multidisciplinary consensus conference (CC) on management of advanced OC presenting with PC during the SICO annual meeting in Naples, Italy, on September 10-11, 2015. An expert committee developed questions on diagnosis and staging work-up, indications, and procedural aspects for peritonectomy, systemic chemotherapy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for PC from OC. These questions were provided to 6 invited speakers who answered with an evidence-based report. Each report was submitted to a jury panel, representative of Italian experts in the fields of surgical oncology, gynecology, and medical oncology. The jury panel revised the reports before and after the open discussion during the CC. This article is the final document containing the clinical evidence reports and statements, revised and approved by all the authors before submission.

Disease extent at secondary cytoreductive surgery is predictive of progression-free and overall survival in advanced stage ovarian cancer: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study

PURPOSE

GOG 152 was a randomized trial of secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in patients with suboptimal residual disease (residual tumor nodule >1cm in greatest diameter) following primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced stage ovarian cancer. The current analysis was undertaken to evaluate the impact of disease findings at SCS on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Among the 550 patients enrolled on GOG-152, two-hundred-sixteen patients were randomly assigned following 3cycles of cisplatin and paclitaxel to receive SCS. In 15 patients (7%) surgery was declined or contraindicated. In the remaining 201 patients the operative and pathology reports were utilized to classify their disease status at the beginning of SCS as; no gross disease/microscopically negative N=40 (19.9%), no gross disease/microscopically positive N=8 (4.0%), and gross disease N=153 (76.1%).

RESULTS

The median PFS for patients with no gross disease/microscopically negative was 16.1months, no gross disease/microscopically positive was 13.5months and for gross disease was 11.7months, P=0.002. The median OS for patients with no gross disease/microscopically negative was 51.5months, no gross disease/microscopically positive was 42.6months and for gross disease was 34.9months, P=0.018.

CONCLUSION

Although as previously reported SCS did not change PFS or OS, for those who underwent the procedure, their operative and pathologic findings were predictive of PFS and OS. Surgical/pathological residual disease is a biomarker of response to chemotherapy and predictive of PFS and OS.

Nadir CA-125 level as prognosis indicator of high-grade serous ovarian cancer

Purpose

The capacity of nadir CA-125 levels to predict the prognosis of epithelial ovarian cancer remains controversial. This study aimed to explore whether the nadir CA-125 serum levels could predict the durations of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HG-SOC) from the USA and PRC.

Materials and methods

A total of 616 HG-SOC patients from the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC, USA) between 1990 and 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. The results of 262 cases from the Jiangsu Institute of Cancer Research (JICR, PRC) between 1992 and 2011 were used to validate the MDACC data. The CA-125 immunohistochemistry assay was performed on 280 tissue specimens. The Cox proportional hazards model and the log-rank test were used to assess the associations between the clinicopathological characteristics and duration of survival.

Results

The nadir CA-125 level was an independent predictor of OS and PFS (p < 0.01 for both) in the MDACC patients. Lower nadir CA-125 levels (≤10 U/mL) were associated with longer OS and PFS (median: 61.2 and 16.8 months with 95% CI: 52.0–72.4 and 14.0–19.6 months, respectively) than their counterparts with shorter OS and PFS (median: 49.2 and 10.5 months with 95% CI: 41.7–56.7 and 6.9–14.1 months, respectively). The nadir CA-125 levels in JICR patients were similarly independent when predicting the OS and PFS (p < 0.01 for both). Nadir CA-125 levels less than or equal to 10 U/mL were associated with longer OS and PFS (median: 59.9 and 15.5 months with 95% CI: 49.7–70.1 and 10.6–20.4 months, respectively), as compared with those more than 10 U/mL (median: 42.0 and 9.0 months with 95% CI: 34.4–49.7 and 6.6–11.2 months, respectively). Baseline serum CA-125 levels, but not the CA-125 expression in tissues, were associated with the OS and PFS of HG-SOC patients in the MDACC and JICR groups. However, these values were not independent. Nadir CA-125 levels were not associated with the tumor burden based on second-look surgery (p = 0.09). Patients who achieved a pathologic complete response had longer OS and PFS (median: 73.7 and 20.7 months with 95% CI: 63.7–83.7 and 9.5–31.9 months, respectively) than those with residual tumors (median: 34.6 and 10.6 months with 95% CI: 6.9–62.3 and 4.9–16.3 months, respectively).

Conclusions

The nadir CA-125 level was an independent predictor of OS and PFS in HG-SOC patients. Further prospective studies are required to clinically optimize the chances for a complete clinical response of HG-SOC cases with higher CA-125 levels (>10 U/mL) at the end of primary treatment.

Risk stratification of abdominopelvic failure for FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer patients: implications for adjuvant radiotherapy

Objective

To analyze patterns of abdominopelvic failures and to define subgroups for the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

Methods

We reviewed 149 patients treated with debulking surgery followed by intravenous taxane and platinum chemotherapy between 1999 and 2008. Patient characteristics, patterns of failure, abdominopelvic failure APF-free survival (APFFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.

Results

The median age of the patients was 51 years. Thirty-two patients (21.5%) were found to have residuum >2 cm after surgery. The median pretreatment CA-125 was 604 and 54.4% of patients had a decline in CA-125 ≥90% between pretreatment and at postoperative 1 month. With a median follow-up of 50 months, 79 patients (53.0%) experienced abdominopelvic failure (APF). The 5-year APF-free survival rate was 41.1%. Lymph node metastasis, size of residual disease, and decline in CA-125 were found to be significant prognostic factors for APF upon multivariate analysis. The group of patients in whom abdominopelvic irradiation was indicated as definitive postoperative treatment comprised 55% of the overall patient population and their 5-year survival rate was 68%.

Conclusion

The stratification was suggested to predict APF based on lymph node metastasis, size of residual tumor, and decline in CA-125. Adjuvant radiotherapy covering the whole abdominopelvis using the intensity modulation technique may be considered to reduce APF in FIGO stage III EOC patients with intermediate risk.

Latest research and treatment of advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer

The natural history of ovarian cancer continues to be characterized by late-stage presentation, metastatic bulky disease burden and stagnant mortality statistics, despite prolific drug development. Robust clinical investigation, particularly with modifications to primary treatment surgical goals and adjuvant therapy are increasing median progression-free survival and overall survival, although the cure rates have been affected only modestly. Maintenance therapy holds promise, but studies have yet to identify an agent and/or strategy that can affect survival. Recurrent disease is largely an incurable state; however, current intervention with selected surgery, combination and targeted therapy and investigational protocols are impacting progression-free survival. Ovarian cancer is a diverse and genomically complex disease, which commands global attention. Rational investigation must balance the high rate of discovery with lagging clinical investigation and limited patient resources. Nevertheless, growth in our armamentarium offers unprecedented opportunities for patients suffering with this disease. This Review presents and reviews the contemporary management of the disease spectrum termed epithelial 'ovarian' cancer and describes the direction and early results of clinical investigation.

Evolution of the Gynecologic Oncology Group protocols in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer

This chapter reviews some of the sentinel Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) ovarian trials, describes their rationale, provides summary tables for reference, and is organized into early ovarian cancer (GOG 1, 7601, 7602, 95, 157, 175, 212), advanced ovarian cancer optimal (2, 25, 52, 104, 114, 158, 172, 182, 178, 212, 252), and suboptimal disease (3, 22, 47, 97, 111, 162, 182, 218, 252, 262).

Surgical management of epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer affects approximately 21,880 women and accounts for over 13,000 deaths annually in the United States. Although survival rates have improved over the past several decades, directly as a result of advances in chemotherapy and surgery, ovarian cancer continues to have high mortality rates. Understanding the multiple roles of surgery throughout the disease course is the focus of this review.

Posttreatment surveillance and diagnosis of recurrence in women with gynecologic malignancies: Society of Gynecologic Oncologists recommendations

Although gynecologic cancers account for only 10% of all new cancer cases in women, these cancers account for 20% of all female cancer survivors. Improvements in cancer care have resulted in almost 10 million cancer survivors, and this number is expected to grow. Therefore, determining the most cost-effective clinical surveillance for detection of recurrence is critical. Unfortunately, there has been a paucity of research in what are the most cost-effective strategies for surveillance once patients have achieved a complete response. Currently, most recommendations are based on retrospective studies and expert opinion. Taking a thorough history, performing a thorough examination, and educating cancer survivors about concerning symptoms is the most effective method for the detection of most gynecologic cancer recurrences. There is very little evidence that routine cytologic procedures or imaging improves the ability to detect gynecologic cancer recurrence at a stage that will impact cure or response rates to salvage therapy. This article will review the most recent data on surveillance for gynecologic cancer recurrence in women who have had a complete response to primary cancer therapy.

Surgical second-look in epithelial ovarian cancer: high recurrence rate after negative results and lack of survival benefit limits its role in standard management

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of surgical second look (SSL) in epithelial ovarian cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

One hundred and seventy-one patients clinically free of disease were assessed retrospectively. Ninety-eight (57.3%) patients underwent SSL and 73 (42.7%) were observed. Fifty-one (52.0%) of the SSL operations were negative, 31 (31.6%) microscopically positive, and 16 (16.3%) macroscopically positive. Cytoreduction and/or chemotherapy were administered after positive SSL. Negative SSL and observation group patients were observed without treatment until recurrence was detected. Disease free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS) and clinical characteristics of groups were compared.

RESULTS

While DFS and OS of negative SSL group were better than the observation, microscopic and macroscopic positive SSL groups (p<.01), no significant difference was found between positive SSL and observation groups (p>.05). However, DFS and OS of the microscopic positive SSL group were significantly longer than the macroscopic positive SSL group (p<.01). Thirty-two patients have had recurrences (62.8%) after negative SSL. Only the use of paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy was seen to prevent recurrence after negative SSL (p<.05). Recurrence after negative SSL was not affected by stage, grade, age, CA-125 level, ascites volume, histologic type or optimal cytoreduction.

CONCLUSION

Rate of recurrence after negative SSL remains high, and secondary efforts following positive SSL could not lead to an obvious survival benefit. Therefore, routine use of SSL seems ineffective and unnecessary.

The prognostic impact of circulating proteasome concentrations in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Intracellularly, the ubiquitin-proteasome system participates in crucial functions such as cell cycling, differentiation, proliferation, gene transcription, and apoptosis. However, in malignancies including ovarian cancer increased extracellular concentrations of circulating 20S proteasomes (c-proteasomes) have been detected in blood. We tested the hypothesis that the c-proteasome plasma concentration is a biomarker associated with the clinical course of ovarian cancer patients.

METHODS

20S-proteasome venous plasma concentration was measured by ELISA in patients presenting with ovarian cancer before (n=120) and after (n=68) primary treatment, and in healthy volunteers (n=55). The median follow-up time was 19 months. To assess the relation of proteasome expression with c-proteasome concentration, tumor specimens from 27 patients were immunohistochemically stained for 20S proteasome using an antibody directed against the core subunits of the catalytic domain of the 20S proteasome.

RESULTS

Median c-proteasome concentration was higher (p<0.0001) in untreated ovarian cancer patients (457.5 ng/ml, range: 200-12540 ng/ml) than in healthy controls 290 ng/ml, range: 140-425 ng/ml). Following completion of primary treatment, the median c-proteasome concentration increased (p=0.003) relative to baseline (595 ng/ml, range: 200-20000 ng/ml) and concentrations positively correlated (p=0.031) with residual disease left at primary surgery. Patients with post-treatment c-proteasome concentrations exceeding the cohort's median showed a diminished survival (p=0.045). We found no correlation between c-proteasome concentration and strength of proteasomal staining in tumor specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Circulating proteasome concentrations correlate with residual tumor mass and might be a prognostic variable in ovarian cancer following primary therapy.

Trials with impact on clinical management: first line

INTRODUCTION

Advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer is generally managed with cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy consisting of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Although initially responsive, most tumors recur and demonstrate progressive chemotherapy resistance. During the last 20 years, many thousands of women have participated in international front-line phase 3 trials that have contributed to our understanding of ovarian cancer biology and helped to define optimal treatment strategies. Emerging data from these trials need to be interpreted within an evolving paradigm of cancer biology, disease management, and availability of clinical resources.

METHODS

Survey of recent phase 3 trials and emerging principles of ovarian tumor biology.

RESULTS

There is no evidence that adding a third cytotoxic agent improves clinical outcomes. However, weekly dose-dense scheduling of paclitaxel appears superior to standard dosing.

CONCLUSION

Primary therapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel remains a well-tolerated standard regimen, including the option of weekly paclitaxel dosing. Data are awaited from completed trials incorporating bevacizumab. Emerging biological paradigms will contribute to individualized treatment options in the future.

Evaluation of new platinum-based treatment regimens in advanced-stage ovarian cancer: a Phase III Trial of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup

PURPOSE

To determine if incorporation of an additional cytotoxic agent improves overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) and primary peritoneal carcinoma who receive carboplatin and paclitaxel.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Women with stages III to IV disease were stratified by coordinating center, maximal diameter of residual tumor, and intent for interval cytoreduction and were then randomly assigned among five arms that incorporated gemcitabine, methoxypolyethylene glycosylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan compared with carboplatin and paclitaxel. The primary end point was OS and was determined by pairwise comparison to the reference arm, with a 90% chance of detecting a true hazard ratio of 1.33 that limited type I error to 5% (two-tail) for the four comparisons.

RESULTS

Accrual exceeded 1,200 patients per year. An event-triggered interim analysis occurred after 272 events on the reference arm, and the study closed with 4,312 women enrolled. Arms were well balanced for demographic and prognostic factors, and 79% of patients completed eight cycles of therapy. There were no improvements in either PFS or OS associated with any experimental regimen. Survival analyses of groups defined by size of residual disease also failed to show experimental benefit in any subgroup.

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard paclitaxel and carboplatin, addition of a third cytotoxic agent provided no benefit in PFS or OS after optimal or suboptimal cytoreduction. Dual-stage, multiarm, phase III trials can efficiently evaluate multiple experimental regimens against a single reference arm. The development of new interventions beyond surgery and conventional platinum-based chemotherapy is required to additionally improve outcomes for women with advanced EOC.

Progress in gynecologic cancer research: the Gynecologic Oncology Group experience

Since 1970, the Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) has been a leader in clinical research in female pelvic cancers. Currently comprising 59 institutions and their affiliates in the United States, Canada, and elsewhere, the GOG has defined, principally through phase III randomized clinical trials, the standard of care for several stages and types of gynecologic cancer. This review will briefly summarize, in the context of research done concurrently by other groups and institutions, important GOG trials that have moved the field forward, especially in ovarian, endometrial, and cervical cancers. The role of cisplatin, carboplatin, and paclitaxel, as well as other drugs and combinations, in gynecologic cancer has been extensively studied by the GOG, as has chemoradiation in cervical cancer. Surgical staging of cervical and endometrial cancers has provided new insights and guidance for management. The benefits and limitations of radiation therapy in these diseases have been examined carefully. Thus, the stage has been set for further progress in this field.

Role of surgery in ovarian carcinoma

Surgery plays a critical role in the optimal management of all stages of ovarian carcinoma. In apparent early-stage ovarian cancer, a comprehensive surgical evaluation allows stratification of patients into low- and high-risk categories. Low-risk patients may be candidates for fertility-sparing surgery and can safely avoid chemotherapy and be observed. Treatment of patients with high-risk early- or advanced-stage ovarian cancer usually requires a combined modality approach. Although it is well known that epithelial ovarian cancer is moderately chemosensitive, what distinguishes it most from other metastatic solid tumors is that surgical cytoreduction of tumor volume is highly correlated with prolongation of patient survival. Procedures such as radical pelvic surgery, bowel resection, and aggressive upper abdominal surgery are commonly required to achieve optimal cytoreduction. Women who develop recurrent disease may be eligible for a secondary cytoreductive surgery or may require a surgical intervention to palliate disease-related symptoms. For women at high risk of ovarian cancer, prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy significantly reduces the incidence of this disease. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the surgical management of ovarian carcinoma. The roles of primary, interval, and secondary cytoreductive surgeries; second-look procedures; and palliative surgery are reviewed. The indications for fertility-sparing and minimally invasive surgery as well as the current guidelines for prophylactic surgery in high-risk mutation carriers are also discussed.

Ovarian cancer: an overview of treatment options

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecologic cancer. Early-stage diagnosis is difficult, and chemotherapy treatments often are not durable. Despite challenges, progress has been made since the 1990s; healthcare professionals now have an increased understanding of the disease biology and can identify hereditary ovarian cancer and provide screening recommendations. The recognized importance of complete staging, cytoreductive surgery, and new effective treatments has made an improvement in five-year survival.

A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study of Platinum-DNA Adducts and Excision Repair Cross-Complementation Group 1 Expression in Optimal, Stage III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Treated with Platinum-Taxane Chemotherapy

To determine whether platinum-DNA adducts and/or mRNA expression of the excision nuclease excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) from peripheral blood leukocytes (PBL) were associated with clinical outcome in women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), participants that had previously untreated, optimally resected, stage III EOC were randomized to paclitaxel plus cisplatin or carboplatin. DNA and RNA were extracted from PBLs collected 20 to 28 h post-drug infusion. DNA adducts were measured by atomic absorption spectroscopy. ERCC1 expression was evaluated by reverse transcription-PCR. There were 170 cases fully evaluable for DNA adducts and ERCC1 mRNA expression. Adduct levels ranged from 0.43 to 131 fmol platinum/microg DNA in 140 samples; and adducts were not detectable in 30 samples. ERCC1 mRNA was detectable in 132 samples and undetectable in 38. ERCC1 mRNA expression in PBLs was not associated with any clinical end point measured. The presence of detectable versus undetectable adducts was associated with longer median progression-free survival (20.4 versus 15.6 months; P = 0.084) and overall survival (60.3 versus 36.3 months; P = 0.029), respectively. Unadjusted Cox regression modeling indicated a trend toward a reduced risk of disease progression [hazard ratio (HR), 0.686; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 0.447-1.054; P = 0.086] and a statistically significant reduction in the risk of death (HR, 0.607; 95% CI, 0.385-0.958; P = 0.032) for women with detectable versus undetectable adducts. After adjusting for clinicopathologic variables, detectable adducts were not an independent predictor of progression-free survival or overall survival. The presence of platinum-DNA adducts, but not ERCC1 mRNA expression, in PBLs was associated with better survival, but was not an independent predictor of clinical outcome in optimal advanced EOC.

Treatments for gynaecological cancers

Gynaecological cancers account for a significant amount of morbidity and mortality in the world, with varying incidences and outcomes depending on the country. These malignancies consist of vulval, vaginal, cervical, endometrial, fallopian and ovarian cancers, and account for between 10 and 15% of women's cancers. Although mainly a disease of post-menopausal women, when affecting younger women, fertility-related consequences exist. Therapeutic interventions for gynaecological cancers include surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with combination modalities often required. The basis for certain therapies are derived from appropriately conducted randomized clinical trial, whereas in some settings, therapy is based on clinical experience and intuition. This review will endeavour to focus on the evidence base, though inevitably, non-evidence based practice is unavoidable.

Intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Standard chemotherapy for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer is a platinum-taxane combination. The Gynecologic Oncology Group conducted a randomized, phase 3 trial that compared intravenous paclitaxel plus cisplatin with intravenous paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel in patients with stage III ovarian cancer.

METHODS

We randomly assigned patients with stage III ovarian carcinoma or primary peritoneal carcinoma with no residual mass greater than 1.0 cm to receive 135 mg of intravenous paclitaxel per square meter of body-surface area over a 24-hour period followed by either 75 mg of intravenous cisplatin per square meter on day 2 (intravenous-therapy group) or 100 mg of intraperitoneal cisplatin per square meter on day 2 and 60 mg of intraperitoneal paclitaxel per square meter on day 8 (intraperitoneal-therapy group). Treatment was given every three weeks for six cycles. Quality of life was assessed.

RESULTS

Of 429 patients who underwent randomization, 415 were eligible. Grade 3 and 4 pain, fatigue, and hematologic, gastrointestinal, metabolic, and neurologic toxic effects were more common in the intraperitoneal-therapy group than in the intravenous-therapy group (P< or =0.001). Only 42 percent of the patients in the intraperitoneal-therapy group completed six cycles of the assigned therapy, but the median duration of progression-free survival in the intravenous-therapy and intraperitoneal-therapy groups was 18.3 and 23.8 months, respectively (P=0.05 by the log-rank test). The median duration of overall survival in the intravenous-therapy and intraperitoneal-therapy groups was 49.7 and 65.6 months, respectively (P=0.03 by the log-rank test). Quality of life was significantly worse in the intraperitoneal-therapy group before cycle 4 and three to six weeks after treatment but not one year after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

As compared with intravenous paclitaxel plus cisplatin, intravenous paclitaxel plus intraperitoneal cisplatin and paclitaxel improves survival in patients with optimally debulked stage III ovarian cancer.