Negative sentinel lymph node accurately predicts negative status of pelvic lymph nodes in uterine cervix carcinoma

Predictors of Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A SENTICOL GROUP Study

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to identify the risk factors for metastasis in the remaining non-sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in the case of positive SLN in early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

An ancillary analysis of two prospective multicentric databases on SLN biopsy for cervical cancer (SENTICOL I and II) was performed. Patients with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO 2018 IA to IIA1), with bilateral SLN detection and at least one positive SLN after ultrastaging, were included.

RESULTS

405 patients were included in SENTICOL I and Il. Fifty-two patients had bilateral SLN detection and were found to have SLN metastasis. After pelvic lymphadenectomy, metastatic involvement of non-SLN was diagnosed in 7 patients (13.5%). Patients with metastatic non-SLN were older (51.9 vs. 40.8 years, p = 0.01), had more often lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI) (85.7% vs. 35.6%, p = 0.03), and had more often parametrial involvement (42.9% vs. 6.7%, p = 0.003). Multivariate analysis retained age (OR = 1.16, 95% IC = [1.01-1.32], p = 0.03) and LVSI (OR = 25.97, 95% IC = [1.16-582.1], p = 0.04) as independently associated with non-SLN involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

Age and LVSI seemed to be predictive of non-SLN metastasis in patients with SLN metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm the results and clinical usefulness of such findings.

Can Conization Specimens Predict Sentinel Lymph Node Status in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer? A SENTICOL Group Study

Simple Summary

Lymph node involvement is one of the major prognosis factors for early-stage cervical cancer. Improvement in preoperative identification of node-positive patients may lead to a more accurate triage to primary chemoradiation for these patients instead of radical surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy, given the increased morbidity of combined treatment. Several studies have well established risk factors for node involvement, but they are based on final pathologic examination of radical hysterectomy specimens and are usually extrapolated for preoperative risk assessment. Among these risk factors, tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and depth of stromal invasion might be assessed in conization specimens. Our findings suggest that patients with depth of stromal invasion lower than 10 mm and no LVSI in conization specimens had lower risk of micro- and macrometastatic SLN. In this subpopulation, full node dissection may be questionable in case of SLN unilateral detection.

Abstract

Background: The prognosis of patients with cervical cancer is significantly worsened in case of lymph node involvement. The goal of this study was to determine whether pathologic features in conization specimens can predict the sentinel lymph node (SLN) status in early-stage cervical cancer. Methods: An ancillary analysis of two prospective multicentric database on SLN biopsy for cervical cancer (SENTICOL I and II) was carried out. Patients with IA to IB2 2018 FIGO stage, who underwent preoperative conization before SLN biopsy were included. Results: Between January 2005 and July 2012, 161 patients from 25 French centers fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Macrometastases, micrometastases and Isolated tumor cells (ITCs) were found in 4 (2.5%), 6 (3.7%) and 5 (3.1%) patients respectively. Compared to negative SLN patients, patients with micrometastatic and macrometastatic SLN were more likely to have lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (60% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.04) and deep stromal invasion (DSI) ≥ 10 mm (50% vs. 17.8%, p = 0.04). Among the 93 patients with DSI < 10 mm and absence of LVSI on conization specimens, three patients (3.2%) had ITCs and only one (1.1%) had micrometastases. Conclusions: Patients with DSI < 10 mm and no LVSI in conization specimens had lower risk of micro- and macrometastatic SLN. In this subpopulation, full node dissection may be questionable in case of SLN unilateral detection.

Pathological factors associated with non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in early stage cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the predictive factors for non-sentinel lymph node (non-SLN) metastasis in early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

We analyzed a series of 113 patients who underwent sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for cervical cancer. The SLNs were examined by immunohistochemistry (IHC) when the hematoxylin-eosin stain was negative.

RESULTS

The overall bilateral detection rate was 81.5%, with a median of two SLNs resected. The study ultimately included 92 patients with SLNs that were mapped who had also undergone systematic pelvic lymph node dissection. Thirteen (14.1%) patients had positive SLNs, with a median of one positive SLN. Regarding the size of SLN metastasis, one (1.1%) had isolated tumor cells (ITC), seven (7.6%) had micrometastases, and five (5.4%) had macrometastases. Notably, 46.1% (6/13) had lymph node metastases detected only after IHC. Five (38.5%) cases had positive non-SLNs, with a median count of one positive lymph node. Parametrial invasion was the only risk factor for positive non-SLN (p = .045). Regarding the size of SLN metastasis, non-SLN involvement was present in the only case with ITC (1/1), 42.9% (3/7) of cases with micrometastases, and in 20% (1/5) with macrometastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that parametrial invasion correlates with the risk of non-SLN metastasis in cervical cancer.

Status of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Vulvar and Cervical Cancer

Assessment of lymphatic metastasis is an essential component of solid tumour staging. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a minimally invasive procedure that allows regional lymph node involvement by tumour to be estimated by selectively examining the sentinel lymph node while minimising the morbidity of systematic lymph node dissection. Within the group of genital cancers, the diagnostic value of SLN biopsy is rated differently. For selected patients with early-stage vulvar cancer (unifocal primary tumour < 4 cm, clinically negative inguinal lymph nodes) the SLN technique is already an established procedure in the guidelines of the German Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (DGGG)/German Cancer Society (DKG) and the recommendations of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO). For cervical cancer, SLN biopsy has not yet been sufficiently standardised but can be considered for patients without risk factors with a primary tumour size < 2 cm. The SLN is identified by combined use of radioactive ^99m technetium nanocolloid and patent blue. The use of indocyanine green offers an alternative for SLN identification with few side effects. Recent studies aim to increase the diagnostic reliability of intraoperative frozen section analysis as this continues to show limited sensitivity in both vulvar and cervical cancer. The rate of detection of micrometastases can be increased by additional ultrastaging, the prognostic significance of which for both diseases is still unclear. The prognostic value of SLN biopsy compared with systematic lymph node dissection is being investigated in current studies (GROINSS-V-II for vulvar cancer and SENTIX-, SENTICOL-3 for cervical cancer). For this review article, a guideline-based literature search was performed in the National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE) database with a particular focus on recent cohort studies and conference contributions.

Histopathologic Validation of the Sentinel Node Technique for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy may be an alternative to systematic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer. The SLN biopsy is less morbid and has been shown to have high sensitivity for metastasis detection. However, the sensitivity of the SLN technique might be overevaluated because SLNs are examined with ultra-staging, and non-sentinel nodes usually are examined only with routine techniques. This study aimed to validate the negative predictive value (NPV) of the SLN technique by the ultra-staging of SLNs and non-sentinel nodes (NSLNs).

METHODS

The SENTICOL 1 study data published in 2011 were used. All nodes (i.e., SLNs and NSLNs) were secondarily subjected to ultra-staging. The ultra-staging consisted of sectioning every 200 µm, in addition to immunohistochemistry. Moreover, the positive slides and 10% of the negative slides were reviewed.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 139 patients, and SLNs were detected in 136 (97.8%) of these patiets. Bilateral SLNs were detected in 104 (76.5%) of the 136 patients. A total of 2056 NSLNs were identified (median, 13 NSLNs per patient; range 1-54). Of the 136 patients with SLNs, 23 were shown to have positive SLNs after serial sectioning and immunohistochemical staining. The NSLNs were metastatic in six patients. In the case of bilateral SLN detection, the NPV was 100%, with no false-negatives (FNs).

CONCLUSIONS

The pelvic SLN technique is safe and trustworthy for determining the nodal status of patients with early-stage cervical cancer. In the case of optimal mapping with bilateral detection, the NPV was found to be 100%.

Central Pathology Review in SENTIX, A Prospective Observational International Study on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (ENGOT-CX2)

The quality of pathological assessment is crucial for the safety of patients with cervical cancer if pelvic lymph node dissection is to be replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Central pathology review of SLN pathological ultrastaging was conducted in the prospective SENTIX/European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial (ENGOT)-CX2 study. All specimens from at least two patients per site were submitted for the central review. For cases with major or critical deviations, the sites were requested to submit all samples from all additional patients for second-round assessment. From the group of 300 patients, samples from 83 cases from 37 sites were reviewed in the first round. Minor, major, critical, and no deviations were identified in 28%, 19%, 14%, and 39% of cases, respectively. Samples from 26 patients were submitted for the second-round review, with only two major deviations found. In conclusion, a high rate of major or critical deviations was identified in the first round of the central pathology review (28% of samples). This reflects a substantial heterogeneity in current practice, despite trial protocol requirements. The importance of the central review conducted prospectively at the early phase of the trial is demonstrated by a substantial improvement of SLN ultrastaging quality in the second-round review.

Pathologic Protocols for Sentinel Lymph Nodes Ultrastaging in Cervical Cancer

CONTEXT.—

Ultrastaging of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is a crucial aspect in the approach to SLN processing. No consensual protocol for pathologic ultrastaging has been approved by international societies to date.

OBJECTIVE.—

To provide a review of the ultrastaging protocol and all its aspects related to the processing of SLNs in patients with cervical cancer.

DATA SOURCES.—

In total, 127 publications reporting data from 9085 cases were identified in the literature. In 24% of studies, the information about SLN processing is entirely missing. No ultrastaging protocol was used in 7% of publications. When described, the differences in all aspects of SLN processing among the studies and institutions are substantial. This includes grossing of the SLN, which is not completely sliced and processed in almost 20% of studies. The reported protocols varied in all aspects of SLN processing, including the thickness of slices (range, 1-5 mm), the number of levels (range, 0-cut out until no tissue left), distance between the levels (range, 40-1000 μm), and number of sections per level (range, 1-5).

CONCLUSIONS.—

We found substantial differences in protocols used for SLN pathologic ultrastaging, which can impact sensitivity for detection of micrometastases and even small macrometastases. Since the involvement of pelvic lymph nodes is the most important negative prognostic factor, such profound discrepancies influence the referral of patients to adjuvant radiotherapy and could potentially cause treatment failure. It is urgent that international societies agree on a consensual protocol before SLN biopsy without pelvic lymphadenectomy is introduced into routine clinical practice.

Risk factors for failure of bilateral sentinel lymph node mapping in early-stage cervical cancer

BACKGROUND

The objective of this study was to determine clinical, tumoral and surgical factors associated with successful bilateral sentinel lymph node mapping (SBM) in early-stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

We performed an ancillary work on the data of two prospective trials on SLN biopsy for FIGO IA-IIA cervical cancer (SENTICOL I & II). Patients having Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for early-stage cervical cancer were included between 2005 and 2012 from 28 French oncologic centers. SLN was detected by a combined labeling technique (blue and isotopic).

RESULTS

405 patients were included for analysis: SLNs were identified on at least one side of the pelvis in 381 patients (94.1%) and bilaterally in 326 patients (80.5%). The mean age was 45.4 years [22-85 years]. Most patients had IB1 pathologic FIGO 2018 stage (81.3%) and squamous cell carcinoma (71%). Surgeries were mainly performed by minimally invasive approach (368 patients - 90.9%). By multivariate analysis, lower SBM rate was significantly associated with Age ≥70 years (ORa = 0.02, 95%CI = [0.001-0.28], p = 0.004), tumor size larger than 20 mm (ORa = 0.46,95%CI = [0.21-0.99], p = 0.048) and Body-mass index higher than 30 kg/m² (ORa = 0.28, 95%CI = [0.12-0.65], p = 0.003). SBM rate was significantly higher in high skills centers (>5patients/year) (ORa = 8.05, 95%CI = [2.06-31.50], p = 0.003) and in SENTICOL II (2009-2012) compared to SENTICOL I (2005-2007) (ORa = 2.6, 95%CI = [1.23-5.51], p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In early-stage cervical cancer, bilateral SLN detection rates is lower in patients aged more than 70years, patients with BMI≥30 kg/m² and larger tumor ≥20 mm whereas stronger experience of SLN biopsy technique improves bilateral SLN detection.

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) concept in cervical cancer: Current limitations and unanswered questions

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been increasingly used in the management of early-stages cervical cancer instead of systematic pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). The aim of this article is to give a critical overview of key aspects related to this concept, such as a necessity for reliable detection of micrometastases (MIC) in SLN and the requirements for SLN pathologic ultrastaging, low accuracy of intraoperative detection of SLN involvement, and still a limited evidence of oncological safety of the replacement of PLND by SLN biopsy only in ≥IB1 tumours due to unknown risk of MIC in non-SLN pelvic lymph nodes in patients with negative SLN, and absence of any prospective evidence.

Current status of sentinel lymph node mapping in the management of cervical cancer

The status of regional lymph nodes is the most important prognostic factor in early cervical cancer patients. Pelvic lymph node dissections are routinely performed as a part of standard surgical treatment. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy is associated with short- and long-term morbidities. This review discusses single components of the sentinel lymph node mapping (SLNM) technique and results of the detection of sentinel lymph nodes. SLNM biopsy performed by an experienced team for small volume tumors (<2 cm) has high specific side detection rate, excellent negative-predictive value and high sensitivity. Uncommon lymphatic drainage has been reported in 15% of cervical cancer patients. There is sufficient data now to suggest that SLNM with 99mTc plus blue dye in the hands of a surgeon with extensive experience should prove to be an important part of individualized cervical cancer surgery and increase the safety of less radical or fertility-sparing surgery.

Value and advantages of preoperative sentinel lymph node imaging with SPECT/CT in cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

Precise detection of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) seems to be a crucial factor for optimized treatment of cervical cancer. We assess the use of single photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography (SPECT/CT) as an alternative to lymphoscintigraphy (LSG) for preoperative identification of SLN.

METHODS

This study was performed in a prospective, unicentric setting. Patients with cervical carcinoma were scheduled for surgery and additional SLN labeling by peritumoral injection of 10 MBq technetium-99m-nanocolloid and patent blue. Thirty minutes after injection, LSG and SPECT/CT were carried out. We evaluated the number of SLNs detected intraoperatively in LSG and SPECT/CT and the histologic findings of SLN and non-SLN. Subsequently, we determined the impact of these results on the therapeutic approach.

RESULTS

This represents the largest study about SPECT/CT for SLN detection in cervical cancer so far. Between August 2008 and March 2013, 59 cervical cancer patients underwent intraoperative SLN detection. In addition, 51 of these patients underwent preoperative LSG and SPECT/CT. Imaging with SPECT/CT detected singular SLN at significantly higher rate (47/51, 92.2%) than that with planar LSG (43/51, 84.3%, P = 0.044). Furthermore, SPECT/CT performed better than LSG regarding the total number of detected SLN (SPECT/CT median, 3 [0-18]; LSG median, 2 [0-15]) and detection rates per pelvic side (SPECT/CT 76.9%, LSG 69.2%, P < 0.01). Whenever SLN detection succeeded, histologic evaluation of SLN correctly predicted the lymph node status per patient's side. Using this type of diagnostic approach for lymph node staging, we reached sensitivity of 100% and negative predictive value of 100% at a rate of false-negative results of 0% even in tumors larger than 4 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Single photon emission computed tomography combined with computed tomography imaging leads to improved rates of SLN detection and better anatomic correlation compared with planar LSG. Thus, intraoperative detection of SLN can be improved by preoperative SPECT/CT imaging. This enhances the clinical value of SLN technique and improves the oncologic safety of SLN concept.

[Sentinel lymph node procedure and uterine cancers]

Lymph node metastases in cervical and endometrial cancer are major prognostic factors. Lymph-nodal involvement determines adjuvant therapy. As imagery is not reliable to diagnose lymph node status, pelvic +/- para-aortic lymphadenectomy remains the gold standard. These surgical procedures are, however, responsible for specific morbidity: lymphocele and lymphedema. Sentinel lymph node procedure could avoid lymphadenectomy and their complications in cervical and endometrial cancer with good negative predictive values. We present actual indications, procedure and results of sentinel lymph node procedures in cervical and endometrial cancer.

The sentinel node concept in early cervical cancer performs well in tumors smaller than 2 cm

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the sentinel node (SLN) concept for lymphatic mapping in early stage cervical cancer.

METHODS

105 women with early stage (1a1-2a) cervical cancer were scheduled for the sentinel node procedure in conjunction with a complete pelvic lymphadenectomy. The day before surgery, 1-1.5 mL 120MBq Tc(99) albumin nanocolloid was injected submucosally at four points around the tumor followed by a lymphoscintigram (LSG) to achieve an overview of the radiotracer uptake.

RESULTS

During surgery, the overall detection rate (gamma probe) of at least one SLN was 90% (94/105 women) whereas at least one SLN was identified in 94% (61/65 women) with a tumor <or=2 cm. Bilateral SLNs were identified in 62/105 (59%) of the women. Among 18 women with any metastatic lymph node 17 had a metastatic SLN (sensitivity 94%, 95% CI 73-100%). Among 61 women with a tumor <or=2 cm, all five women with any metastatic lymph node also had a metastatic SLN (sensitivity 100%). One woman with a 1.5-cm squamous epithelial carcinoma had metastatic positive SLNs on each side but also one metastatic bulky (>2 cm) node without radiotracer uptake. The negative predictive value for patients with cervical cancers <or=2 cm was 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The SLN-technique seems to be an accurate method for identifying lymph node metastases in cervical cancer patients with tumors of 2 cm or smaller. In case of a unilateral SLN only, a complete lymphadenectomy should be performed on the radionegative side. All bulky nodes must be removed.

Management of pelvic lymph nodes by sentinel node navigation surgery in the treatment of invasive cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

Diagnosis of lymph node metastasis is a critical issue in the treatment of cervical cancer. Many studies describing sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) for examination of node status have been reported in the past decade. In this study, the feasibility of node status diagnosis by SNNS, including intraoperative frozen section diagnosis, in patients with early and advanced cervical cancer was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-eight cervical cancer patients with early and advanced stage disease were enrolled. All patients were treated with backup pelvic lymphadenectomy after SNNS. To detect sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), radioactive material and/or blue dye were used as tracers. Lymph nodes confirmed as SLNs were immediately sent to pathologists and diagnosed by frozen section intraoperatively.

RESULTS

A total of 118 and 16 SLNs were pathologically investigated in early and advanced stage cervical cancer, respectively. The detection rate of SLNs in the early and advanced stages was 94.7% and 66.7%, respectively, whereas the detection rate using 1 or 2 tracers was 62.5% and 90%, respectively. The false-negative rate and negative predictive value was 0% and 100% for all stages. Pathological diagnosis by frozen section was completed within 30 minutes in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrate that SNNS in cervical cancer is a promising procedure for patients with early stage (up to Ib1) disease, especially patients with small tumor diameter (<2.0 cm). However, SNNS raises several points for discussion before it can be established as a practical clinical procedure or as part of a subsequent radical hysterectomy.

Sentinel node (SLN) biopsy in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer

OBJECTIVES

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy can significantly contribute to the management of locally advanced cervical cancers with high risk of lymph node (LN) positivity. However, low detection rate and sensitivity were reported in larger tumors, albeit on a small number of cases. It was the aim of our study to verify the SLN reliability in large tumors, with modified dye application technique and a careful identification of side-specific lymphatic drainage.

METHODS

The study involved 44 patients with tumors 3 cm in diameter or larger, stages IB1 to IIA, or selected IIB. In cases where SLN could not be detected, systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed on the respective side. Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed during the second step radical procedure if not already done.

RESULTS

Detection rate in the whole cohort reached 77% per patient and 59% bilaterally. No significant difference was found whether a blue dye or a combined method was used (75% vs 80%, and 55% vs 67%). Systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in cases with undetected SLN unilaterally in 8 and bilaterally in 10 women. A systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was included in the second step radical procedure in 19 cases and no positive LN were found. There was no case of false-negative SLN result in patients who underwent surgical treatment.

CONCLUSION

Detection rate in locally advanced cervical cancer could be improved by a careful dye application technique. Low false-negative SLN rate could be achieved if pelvic lymphatic drainage is evaluated on a side-specific principle by performing systematic lymphadenectomy if SLN is not detected.

Detection of micrometastases in cervical cancer with a system that evaluates both sentinel and nonsentinel lymph nodes

The aim is to reevaluate the accuracy of our sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection procedure and the use of SLN examination for detecting cervical cancer micrometastases. Patients affected by cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy and total pelvic lymphadenectomy at Tohoku University Hospital from 2001 to 2003 were enrolled in this study. Patients in whom lymph node metastases were detected by routine histological examination or in whom no SLNs could be detected were excluded. Paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were cut into 3-microm thick slides at 200-microm intervals for both SLNs and non-SLNs. All lymph nodes were evaluated with step-serial sectioning and immunohistochemistry with an anticytokeratin antibody. One of the 10 patients had micrometastases, and 1 patient had isolated tumor cells (ITCs) in their SLNs. Thus, 2 (6%) of the 31 SLNs detected by our method had cancer cells. In contrast, none of the 309 non-SLNs obtained from 10 patients had micrometastases. The SLN micrometastases were detected in the right external iliac basin. The ITCs were detected in the left external iliac basin. The patient with micrometastases did not have vascular invasion but experienced recurrence. The case with ITCs had vascular invasion; however, she received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and had no recurrence after 4 years. Our study suggests that only SLNs will contain micrometastases or ITCs, and non-SLNs will not. The SLNs detected by our method are probably real given the large total number of nodes evaluated. How micrometastases affect prognosis and the best way to detect them are areas of further study.

New developments in the surgical therapy of cervical carcinoma

For almost a century abdominal radical hysterectomy has been the standard surgical treatment of early-stage macroscopic carcinoma of the uterine cervix. The excessive parametrial resection of the original procedures of Wertheim, Okabayashi, and Meigs has later been "tailored" to tumor extent. Systematic pelvic and eventually periaortic lymph node dissection is performed to identify and treat regional disease. Adjuvant (chemo)radiation therapy is liberally added to improve locoregional tumor control when histopathological risk factors are present. The therapeutic index of the current surgical treatment, particularly if combined with radiation, appears to be inferior to that of primary chemoradiation as an oncologically equivalent therapeutic alternative. Several avenues of new conceptual and technical developments have been used since the 1990s with the goal of improving the therapeutic index. These are: surgical staging, including sentinel node biopsy and nodal debulking; minimal access and recently robotic radical hysterectomy; fertility-preserving surgery; nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy; total mesometrial resection based on developmentally defined surgical anatomy; and supraradical hysterectomy. The superiority of these new developments over the standard treatment remains to be demonstrated by controlled prospective trials. Multimodality therapy including surgery for locally advanced disease represents another area of clinical research. Both neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery, with or without adjuvant radiation, and completion surgery after (chemo)radiation are feasible and have to be compared to primary chemoradiation as the new nonsurgical treatment standard. Surgical treatment of postirradiation persisting or recurrent cervical carcinoma has been traditionally limited to pelvic exenteration for central disease. Applying the principle of developmentally derived anatomical compartments increases R0 resectability. The laterally extended endopelvic resection allows even the extirpation of a subset of visceral pelvic side wall tumors with clear margins. Many questions regarding the indication for these "ultraradical" operations, the surgery of irradiated tissues, and the optimal reconstructive procedures are still open and demand multi-institutional controlled trials to be answered.

Ultrastaging improves detection of metastases in sentinel lymph nodes of uterine cervix squamous cell carcinoma

The technique of sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is increasingly being applied in patients with uterine cervix carcinoma. This study presents the pathologic findings of SLNs in 48 such patients. The institutional pathology files were searched for all patients with a diagnosis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma who had SLNs reported. Patient age, follow-up, tumor size, presence/absence of lymphatic invasion, number and status of SLNs and non-SLNs, location of SLNs, and size of metastases in SLNs were recorded. All SLNs were sectioned in 2-mm slices perpendicular to the long axis and submitted entirely for microscopic examination. For all SLNs negative on the initial hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slides, an ultrastaging protocol was performed consisting of 5 sets of slides at 40-mum intervals (1 H&E slide+2 unstained slides), representing an additional 5 intervals. Lymph nodes negative by the additional H&E intervals had immunohistochemistry for cytokeratin performed on 1 unstained slide. Forty-eight patients ranging from 25 to 62 years of age had a total of 208 SLNs removed. Fifteen (31%) patients had positive SLNs with 1 to 5 positive SLNs per case. The metastasis size ranged from a single cell to 27 mm. Twelve patients had metastasis detected by routine processing in 23 SLNs, whereas ultrastaging detected metastases in 3 SLNs of 3 additional patients. In 2 patients with metastasis detected by ultrastaging, the metastasis was detected by wide H&E intervals (level 2 for 1 patient; level 3 for 1 patient); in 1 patient, the metastasis was detected only by immunohistochemistry and consisted of a single cell. Of the 15 patients with positive SLNs, 3 patients had a total of 6 positive non-SLNs. All of the patients with a positive SLN are currently living. Thirty-three (69%) patients had negative SLNs. Of these, 1 patient had a single positive non-SLN for a false negative rate of 6.25%. Negative SLN predicts negative non-SLN. For most patients with a positive SLN, the SLN will be the only metastasis detected; a minority of patients with a positive SLN may have a positive non-SLN.

The sentinel node concept in endometrial cancer: histopathologic validation by serial section and immunohistochemistry

BACKGROUND

The sentinel node (SN) is defined as the first node in the lymphatic system that drains a tumor site. If the SN is not metastatic, then all other nodes should also be disease-free. We used serial sections and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining to examine both SN and non-sentinel nodes (non-SNs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-three patients (median age 69 years) with early endometrial cancer underwent a laparoscopic SN procedure based on a combined detection method, followed by complete laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy. If the SN was free of metastasis by both hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and IHC staining, all non-SNs were also examined by the combined staining method.

RESULTS

SNs were identified in 19 patients (82.6%). A total of 47 SNs were removed (mean 2.5). Ten SNs (21.3%) from five patients (26.3%) were found to be metastatic at the final histologic assessment. In 14 patients, no metastatic SN involvement was detected by H&E and IHC staining. In these 14 patients, 120 non-SNs were examined by serial sectioning and IHC, and none were found to be metastatic.

CONCLUSION

The SN procedure appears to reliably predict the metastatic status of the regional lymphatic basin in patients with early endometrial cancer.

Laparoscopic sentinel lymph node mapping for cervix cancer--a detailed evaluation and time analysis

OBJECTIVE

To provide data from a US center on laparoscopic (LSC) approach to sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection in cervix cancer with detailed time analysis.

METHODS

This prospective trial enrolled patients with stage IA2-IIA cervix cancer undergoing primary radical surgery. Tc-99 radiocolloid was injected the morning of surgery, followed by hybrid SPECT/CT lymphoscintigraphy. Blue dye injection occurred just prior to incision. After bilateral LSC SLN detection, all patients received complete LSC pelvic lymphadenectomy. Institutional SLN protocol was followed for frozen section, hematoxylin and eosin, and cytokeratin staining.

RESULTS

Between December 2003 and February 2006, 20 enrolled patients received 9 LSC-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomies, 7 radical abdominal hysterectomies, 2 LSC-assisted radical vaginal trachelectomies, and 2 LSC lymphadenectomies alone (secondary to positive lymph nodes). Mean tumor size was 2.5 cm. Nineteen percent of the 64 SLNs were found in unusual sites, including common iliac (11%), presacral (5%) and para-aortic (3%). The negative predictive value was 100%. The combined technique detected SLNs bilaterally in all patients. If blue dye alone was used, this rate would have dropped to 67.5% and was negatively correlated with elapsed surgical time (-0.7; p=0.002). The ability to visualize blue SLNs remained steady for 30 min and was completely gone by 50 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic SLN mapping can be newly introduced into gynecologic oncology centers with high detection rates and negative predictive values. The visualization of blue dye in SLNs is transient, and this negative time correlation may explain the previously reported inferior detection rates with this technique. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION.: ClinicalTrials.gov, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT 00205010.