1
|
Boria F, Chiva L, Chacon E, Zanagnolo V, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Shamistan A, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Zusterzeel PLM, Aluloski I, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Demirkiran F, Vorgias G, Povolotskaya N, Coronado Martín PJ, Marina T, Zapardiel I, Bizzarri N, Gorostidi M, Gutierrez M, Manzour N, Berasaluce A, Martin-Calvo N. SUCCOR quality: validation of ESGO quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:1236-1243. [PMID: 36583728 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether compliance with European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) surgery quality indicators impacts disease-free survival in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. METHODS In this retrospective cohort study, 15 ESGO quality indicators were assessed in the SUCCOR database (patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage 2009 IB1, FIGO 2018 IB1, and IB2 cervical cancer between January 2013 and December 2014), and the final score ranged between 0 and 16 points. Centers with more than 13 points were classified as high-quality indicator compliance centers. We constructed a weighted cohort using inverse probability weighting to adjust for the variables. We compared disease-free survival and overall survival using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in the weighted cohort. RESULTS A total of 838 patients were included in the study. The mean number of quality indicators compliance in this cohort was 13.6 (SD 1.45). A total of 479 (57.2%) patients were operated on at high compliance centers and 359 (42.8%) patients at low compliance centers. High compliance centers performed more open surgeries (58.4% vs 36.7%, p<0.01). Women who were operated on at centers with high compliance with quality indicators had a significantly lower risk of relapse (HR=0.39; 95% CI 0.25 to 0.61; p<0.001). The association was reduced, but remained significant, after further adjustment for conization, surgical approach, and use of manipulator surgery (HR=0.48; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.75; p=0.001) and adjustment for adjuvant therapy (HR=0.47; 95% CI 0.30 to 0.74; p=0.001). Risk of death from disease was significantly lower in women operated on at centers with high adherence to quality indicators (HR=0.43; 95% CI 0.19 to 0.97; p=0.041). However, the association was not significant after adjustment for conization, surgical approach, use of manipulator surgery, and adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS Patients with early cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy in centers with high compliance with ESGO quality indicators had a lower risk of recurrence and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Boria
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | - Anna Fagotti
- Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | - Constantijne Mom
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | | | - Octavio Arencibia
- Department of Gynecology, University Maternal Hospital Canary Islands, Las Palmas, Las Palmas, Spain
| | | | - Tayfun Toptas
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Department of Oncogynecology, Kazahskij naucno-issledovatel'skij institut onkologii i radiologii, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Dmytro Golub
- Department of Surgery, LISOD - Israeli Oncological Hospital, Kyiv Region, Ukraine
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico S Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Robert Poka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology; Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | - Igor Aluloski
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ss Cyril and Methodius University of Skopje, Skopjeskopje, Macedonia
| | - Frederic Goffin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Margarida Bernardino
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rasiah Bharathan
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Minna M Maenpaa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vladyslav Sukhin
- Department of Oncology, Radiology and Radiation Medicine, V N Karazin Kharkiv National University, Harkiv, Ukraine.,Department of Oncogynecology, Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology NAMS of Ukraine, Harkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Kersti Kukk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Fuat Demirkiran
- Istanbul University Cerrrahpasa Medical Faculty, istanbul, Turkey
| | - George Vorgias
- Metaxa Cancer Hospital of Piraeus, Piraeus, Attika, Greece
| | - Natalia Povolotskaya
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK
| | - Pluvio J Coronado Martín
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC, Complutense University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Tiermes Marina
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ignacio Zapardiel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nicolò Bizzarri
- UOC Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Monica Gutierrez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Arantxa Berasaluce
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Nerea Martin-Calvo
- ,Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chacon E, Manzour N, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Núñez-Córdoba JM, Martin-Calvo N, Căpîlna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Shamistan A, Gil Moreno A, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujić G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Minguez JA, Vázquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Boria F, Alcazar JL, Chiva L. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2022; 32:117-124. [PMID: 35039455 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2021] [Accepted: 12/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate disease-free survival of cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009). METHODS A multicenter retrospective observational cohort study was conducted including patients from the Surgery in Cervical Cancer Comparing Different Surgical Aproaches in Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer (SUCCOR) database with FIGO 2009 IB1 cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2014. We used propensity score matching to minimize the potential allocation biases arising from the retrospective design. Patients who underwent conization but were similar for other measured characteristics were matched 1:1 to patients from the non-cone group using a caliper width ≤0.2 standard deviations of the logit odds of the estimated propensity score. RESULTS We obtained a weighted cohort of 374 patients (187 patients with prior conization and 187 non-conization patients). We found a 65% reduction in the risk of relapse for patients who had cervical conization prior to radical hysterectomy (hazard ratio (HR) 0.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.16 to 0.75, p=0.007) and a 75% reduction in the risk of death for the same sample (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90, p=0.033). In addition, patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery without prior conization had a 5.63 times higher chance of relapse compared with those who had an open approach and previous conization (HR 5.63, 95% CI 1.64 to 19.3, p=0.006). Patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery with prior conization and those who underwent open surgery without prior conization showed no differences in relapse rates compared with those who underwent open surgery with prior cone biopsy (reference) (HR 1.94, 95% CI 0.49 to 7.76, p=0.349 and HR 2.94, 95% CI 0.80 to 10.86, p=0.106 respectively). CONCLUSIONS In this retrospective study, patients undergoing cervical conization before radical hysterectomy had a significantly lower risk of relapse and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrique Chacon
- Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Nabil Manzour
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Nerea Martin-Calvo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Fagotti
- University Hospital Agostino Gemelli Gynaecological Oncology Complex Operative Unit, Roma, Lazio, Italy
| | | | - Constantijne Mom
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Antonio Gil Moreno
- Gynecology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital, Sant Cugat Del Vallés, Barcelona, Spain.,Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Tayfun Toptas
- Gynecologic Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Oncogynecology, Kazahskij Naucno-issledovatel'skij Institut Onkologii i Radiologii, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Dmytro Golub
- Department of Surgery, LISOD-Israeli Oncological Hospital, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico SantOrsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Robert Poka
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Dimitrios Tsolakidis
- General Hospital of Thessaloniki Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
| | | | - Marcin A Jedryka
- Oncological Gynecology, Lower Silesian Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Frederic Goffin
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Igor Berlev
- North-Western State Medical University, NN Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Saint-Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Margarida Bernardino
- Gynecology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rasiah Bharathan
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Maximilian Lanner
- Kardinal Schwarzenberg'sches Krankenhaus, Schwarzach, Steiermark, Austria
| | - Minna M Maenpaa
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vladyslav Sukhin
- Oncogynecology, Grigorev Institute for Radiology, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Kersti Kukk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Felix Boria
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Alcazar
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Borčinová M, Ragosch V, Jarkovský J, Bajsová S, Pilka R, Glickman A, Garrido-Mallach S, Raspagliesi F, Szatkowski W, Pakiz M, Snyman LC, Kocián R, Tamussino K, Kalist V, Michal M, Segovia MG, Poka R, Kipp B, Szewczyk G, Wydra D, Tóth R, Vinnytska A, Fischerová D, Siegler K, Cibula D. Challenges in lower limb lymphoedema assessment based on limb volume change: Lessons learnt from the SENTIX prospective multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:76-84. [PMID: 34763939 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower limb lymphoedema (LLL) is the most disabling adverse effect of surgical staging of pelvic lymph nodes. However, the lack of standardisation of volumetric LLL assessment hinders direct comparison between the studies and makes LLL reporting unreliable. The aim of our study is to report outcomes from a prospective trial that have implications for LLL assessment standardisation. METHODS In the prospective international multicentre trial SENTIX, a group of 150 patients with stage IA1-IB2 cervical cancer treated by uterine surgery with bilateral sentinel lymph node biopsy was prospectively evaluated by objective LLL assessment, based on limb volume change (LVC) using circumferrential limb measurements and subjective patient-reported swelling. The assessments were conducted in six-month periods over 24 months post-surgery. RESULTS Patient LVC substantially fluctuated in both positive and negative directions, which were comparable in frequency up to ±14% change. Thirty-eight patients experienced persistent LVC increase >10% classified as LLL, with nine months median time to onset. Some 34.2% of cases experienced onset later than one year after the surgery. Thirty-three patients (22%) experienced transient oedema characterised as LVC >10%, which resolved without intervention between two consequent follow-up visits. No significant correlation between LVC >10% and a patient-reported swelling was observed. CONCLUSIONS Given that we observed comparable fluctuations of the the lower-limb volumes after surgical treatment of cervical cancer in both positive and negative direction up to ±14%, the diagnostic threshold for LLL diagnosis based on LVC should be increased to >15% LVC. The distinction of transient oedema from persistent LLL requires repeated measurements. Also, as one-third of LLL cases are diagnosed >1-year post-surgery, a sufficient follow-up duration needs to be ensured. Patient-reported swelling correlated poorly with LVC and should only be used as an adjunct to objective LLL assessment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02494063.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Borčinová
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Volker Ragosch
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jiří Jarkovský
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Sylva Bajsová
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG, Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic
| | - Radovan Pilka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, University Hospital Olomouc, Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Ariel Glickman
- Unit of Gynecological Oncology, Institute Clinic of Gynaecology, Obstetrics, and Neonatology, Hospital Clinic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Maja Pakiz
- University medical Centre Maribor, Slovenia
| | | | - Roman Kocián
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert Poka
- Department of obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Barbara Kipp
- Neue Freuenklinik, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Róbert Tóth
- Oncology Institute of East Slovakia, Košice, Slovakia
| | | | - Daniela Fischerová
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kathrin Siegler
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Boria F, Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, Căpîlna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Shamistan A, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujić G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Alonso-Espías M, Minguez JA, Vázquez-Vicente D, Manzour N, Jurado M, Castellanos T, Chacon E, Alcazar JL. Radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer in Europe: characteristics, outcomes and evaluation of ESGO quality indicators. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021; 31:1212-1219. [PMID: 34321289 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Comprehensive updated information on cervical cancer surgical treatment in Europe is scarce. OBJECTIVE To evaluate baseline characteristics of women with early cervical cancer and to analyze the outcomes of the ESGO quality indicators after radical hysterectomy in the SUCCOR database. METHODS The SUCCOR database consisted of 1272 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) between January 2013 and December 2014. After exclusion criteria, the final sample included 1156 patients. This study first described the clinical, surgical, pathological, and follow-up variables of this population and then analyzed the outcomes (disease-free survival and overall survival) after radical hysterectomy. Surgical-related ESGO quality indicators were assessed and the accomplishment of the stated recommendations was verified. RESULTS The mean age of the patients was 47.1 years (SD 10.8), with a mean body mass index of 25.4 kg/m2 (SD 4.9). A total of 423 (36.6%) patients had a previous cone biopsy. Tumor size (clinical examination) <2 cm was observed in 667 (57.7%) patients. The most frequent histology type was squamous carcinoma (794 (68.7%) patients), and positive lymph nodes were found in 143 (12.4%) patients. A total of 633 (54.8%) patients were operated by open abdominal surgery. Intra-operative complications occurred in 108 (9.3%) patients, and post-operative complications during the first month occurred in 249 (21.5%) patients, with bladder dysfunction as the most frequent event (119 (10.3%) patients). Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication occurred in 56 (4.8%) patients. A total of 510 (44.1%) patients received adjuvant therapy. After a median follow-up of 58 months (range 0-84), the 5-year disease-free survival was 88.3%, and the overall survival was 94.9%. In our population, 10 of the 11 surgical-related quality indicators currently recommended by ESGO were fully fulfilled 5 years before its implementation. CONCLUSIONS In this European cohort, the rate of adjuvant therapy after radical hysterectomy is higher than for most similar patients reported in the literature. The majority of centers were already following the European recommendations even 5 years prior to the ESGO quality indicator implementations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Boria
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Chiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Denis Querleu
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonie, Bordeaux, France
| | - Nerea Martin-Calvo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Fagotti
- Department of Woman, Child, and Public Health, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Constantijne Mom
- Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mario Malzoni
- Endoscopica Malzoni, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | | | | | - Francesco Raspagliesi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | - Tayfun Toptas
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Oncogynecology, Kazahskij Naucno-Issledovatel'skij Institut Onkologii i Radiologii, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mariana Tavares
- Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto Francisco Gentil, Porto, Portugal
| | - Dmytro Golub
- Department of Surgery, LISOD - Israeli Oncological Hospital, Kyiv region, Ukraine
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico SantOrsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Robert Poka
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology, Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Dimitrios Tsolakidis
- General Hospital of Thessaloniki Papageorgiou, Thessaloniki, Central Macedonia, Greece
| | | | - Marcin A Jedryka
- Department of Oncological Gynecology, Uniwersytet Medyczny im Piastów Śląskich we Wrocławiu (Wroclaw Medical University), Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Frederic Goffin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Igor Berlev
- North-Western State Medical University. N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, Saint-Petersburg, Saint-Petersburg, Russian Federation
| | - Margarida Bernardino
- Department of Gynecology, Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rasiah Bharathan
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Maximilian Lanner
- Kardinal Schwarzenberg'sches Krankenhaus, Schwarzach, Steiermark, Austria
| | - Minna M Maenpaa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vladyslav Sukhin
- Department of Oncology, Radiology and Radiation Medicine, V N Karazin Kharkiv National University, Harkiv, Ukraine.,Department of Oncogynecology, Grigoriev Institute for Medical Radiology NAMS of Ukraine, Harkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Kersti Kukk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | - María Alonso-Espías
- Department of Gynecologíc Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jose Angel Minguez
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | | | - Nabil Manzour
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra Departamento de Ginecologia y Obstetricia, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Matias Jurado
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Teresa Castellanos
- Department of Gynecology, Clinica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Navarra, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Alcazar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine; University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Di Fiore R, Suleiman S, Ellul B, O’Toole SA, Savona-Ventura C, Felix A, Napolioni V, Conlon NT, Kahramanoglu I, Azzopardi MJ, Dalmas M, Calleja N, Brincat MR, Muscat-Baron Y, Sabol M, Dimitrievska V, Yordanov A, Vasileva-Slaveva M, von Brockdorff K, Micallef RA, Kubelac P, Achimas-Cadariu P, Vlad C, Tzortzatou O, Poka R, Giordano A, Felice A, Reed N, Herrington CS, Faraggi D, Calleja-Agius J. GYNOCARE Update: Modern Strategies to Improve Diagnosis and Treatment of Rare Gynecologic Tumors—Current Challenges and Future Directions. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13030493. [PMID: 33514073 PMCID: PMC7865420 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13030493] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary More than 50% of all the tumors affecting the female genital tract can be classified as rare and usually have a poor prognosis owing to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Currently, gynecologic cancer research, due to distinct scientific and technological challenges, is lagging behind. Moreover, the overall efforts for addressing these challenges are fragmented across different countries. The European Network for Gynecological Rare Cancer Research: GYNOCARE aims to address these challenges by creating a unique network between key stakeholders covering distinct domains from basic research to cure. GYNOCARE is part of a European Collaboration in Science and Technology (COST) with the aim to focus on the development of new approaches to improve the diagnosis and treatment of rare gynecological tumors. Here, we provide a brief overview describing the goals of this COST Action and its future challenges with the aim to continue fighting against this rare cancer. Abstract More than 50% of all gynecologic tumors can be classified as rare (defined as an incidence of ≤6 per 100,000 women) and usually have a poor prognosis owing to delayed diagnosis and treatment. In contrast to almost all other common solid tumors, the treatment of rare gynecologic tumors (RGT) is often based on expert opinion, retrospective studies, or extrapolation from other tumor sites with similar histology, leading to difficulty in developing guidelines for clinical practice. Currently, gynecologic cancer research, due to distinct scientific and technological challenges, is lagging behind. Moreover, the overall efforts for addressing these challenges are fragmented across different European countries and indeed, worldwide. The GYNOCARE, COST Action CA18117 (European Network for Gynecological Rare Cancer Research) programme aims to address these challenges through the creation of a unique network between key stakeholders covering distinct domains from concept to cure: basic research on RGT, biobanking, bridging with industry, and setting up the legal and regulatory requirements for international innovative clinical trials. On this basis, members of this COST Action, (Working Group 1, “Basic and Translational Research on Rare Gynecological Cancer”) have decided to focus their future efforts on the development of new approaches to improve the diagnosis and treatment of RGT. Here, we provide a brief overview of the current state-of-the-art and describe the goals of this COST Action and its future challenges with the aim to stimulate discussion and promote synergy across scientists engaged in the fight against this rare cancer worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Di Fiore
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta; (R.D.F.); (S.S.)
- Center for Biotechnology, Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA;
| | - Sherif Suleiman
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta; (R.D.F.); (S.S.)
| | - Bridget Ellul
- Centre for Molecular Medicine & Biobanking, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta;
| | - Sharon A. O’Toole
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Histopathology, Trinity St James’s Cancer Institute, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland;
| | - Charles Savona-Ventura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta;
| | - Ana Felix
- Department of Pathology, Campo dos Mártires da Pátria, Instituto Portugues de Oncologia de Lisboa, NOVA Medical School, UNL, 130, 1169-056 Lisboa, Portugal;
| | - Valerio Napolioni
- Genomic And Molecular Epidemiology (GAME) Lab., School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino, Italy;
| | - Neil T. Conlon
- National Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, 9 Dublin, Ireland;
| | - Ilker Kahramanoglu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Emsey Hospital, Istanbul 3400, Turkey;
| | - Miriam J. Azzopardi
- Directorate for Health Information and Research, PTA 1313 G’Mangia, Malta; (M.J.A.); (N.C.)
| | - Miriam Dalmas
- Office of the Chief Medical Officer, Department of Policy in Health, Ministry for Health, 15 Merchants Street, VLT 1171 Valletta, Malta;
| | - Neville Calleja
- Directorate for Health Information and Research, PTA 1313 G’Mangia, Malta; (M.J.A.); (N.C.)
| | - Mark R. Brincat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Dei Hospital, Triq Dun Karm, MSD 2090 Msida, Malta; (M.R.B.); (Y.M.-B.)
| | - Yves Muscat-Baron
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Mater Dei Hospital, Triq Dun Karm, MSD 2090 Msida, Malta; (M.R.B.); (Y.M.-B.)
| | - Maja Sabol
- Laboratory for Hereditary Cancer, Division of Molecular Medicine, Ruđer Bošković Institute, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia;
| | | | - Angel Yordanov
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical University Pleven, 5800 Pleven, Bulgaria;
| | | | - Kristelle von Brockdorff
- Sir Anthony Mamo Oncology Centre, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Mater Dei Hospital, MSD 2090 Msida, Malta; (K.v.B.); (R.A.M.)
| | - Rachel A. Micallef
- Sir Anthony Mamo Oncology Centre, Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Mater Dei Hospital, MSD 2090 Msida, Malta; (K.v.B.); (R.A.M.)
| | - Paul Kubelac
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Oncology Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă”. 34–36 Republicii Street, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
- Department of Oncology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.A.-C.); (C.V.)
| | - Patriciu Achimas-Cadariu
- Department of Oncology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.A.-C.); (C.V.)
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The Oncology Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta”, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Catalin Vlad
- Department of Oncology, “Iuliu Hatieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (P.A.-C.); (C.V.)
- Department of Surgery, The Oncology Institute “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta”, 400015 Cluj Napoca, Romania
| | - Olga Tzortzatou
- Biomedical Research Foundation of the Academy of Athens, Soranou Efesiou 4 str., 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Robert Poka
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Debrecen, Nagyerdei krt. 98, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary;
| | - Antonio Giordano
- Center for Biotechnology, Sbarro Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA;
- Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy
| | - Alex Felice
- Centre of Molecular Medicine and BioBanking, Department of Physiology & Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine & Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta;
| | - Nicholas Reed
- Beatson Oncology Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK;
| | - C. Simon Herrington
- Cancer Research UK Edinburgh Centre, Western General Hospital, University of Edinburgh, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XR, UK;
| | - David Faraggi
- Department of Statistics, University of Haifa, Haifa 31905, Israel;
| | - Jean Calleja-Agius
- Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Malta, MSD 2080 Msida, Malta; (R.D.F.); (S.S.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +356-2340-1892
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zapardiel I, Kocian R, Köhler C, Klat J, Germanova A, Jacob A, Bajsova S, Böhmer G, Lay L, Gil-Ibañez B, Havelka P, Kipp B, Szewczyk G, Toth R, Staringer JC, De Santiago J, Coronado PJ, Poka R, Laky R, Luyckx M, Fastrez M, Dusek L, Hernandez A, Cibula D. Voiding recovery after radical parametrectomy in cervical cancer patients: An international prospective multicentre trial - SENTIX. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 160:729-734. [PMID: 33419610 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Voiding dysfunctions represent a leading morbidity after radical hysterectomy performed in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to perform ad hoc analysis of factors influencing voiding recovery in SENTIX (SENTinel lymph node biopsy in cervIX cancer) trial. METHODS The SENTIX trial (47 sites, 18 countries) is a prospective study on sentinel lymph node biopsy without pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Overall, the data of 300 patients were analysed. Voiding recovery was defined as the number of days from surgery to bladder catheter/epicystostomy removal or to post-voiding urine residuum ≤50 mL. RESULTS The median voiding recovery time was three days (5th-95th percentile: 0-21): 235 (78.3%) patients recovered in <7 days and 293 (97.7%) in <30 days. Only seven (2.3%) patients recovered after >30 days. In the multivariate analysis, only previous pregnancy (p = 0.033) and type of parametrectomy (p < 0.001) significantly influenced voiding recovery >7 days post-surgery. Type-B parametrectomy was associated with a higher risk of delayed voiding recovery than type-C1 (OR = 4.69; p = 0.023 vs. OR = 3.62; p = 0.052, respectively), followed by type-C2 (OR = 5.84; p = 0.011). Both previous pregnancy and type C2 parametrectomy independently prolonged time to voiding recovery by two days. CONCLUSIONS Time to voiding recovery is significantly related to previous pregnancy and type of parametrectomy but it is not influenced by surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive), age, or BMI. Type B parametrectomy, without direct visualisation of nerves, was associated with longer recovery than nerve-sparing type C1. Importantly, voiding dysfunctions after radical surgery are temporary, and the majority of the patients recover in less than 30 days, including patients after C2 parametrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ignacio Zapardiel
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Roman Kocian
- Gynaecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Cristhardt Köhler
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Germanova
- Gynaecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Anna Jacob
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Sylva Bajsova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, Poruba, Czech Republic
| | - Gerd Böhmer
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Laura Lay
- Department of Gynaecology, Institute of Oncology Angel H Roffo University of Bueno s Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Blanca Gil-Ibañez
- Unit of Gynaecological Oncology, Institute Clinic of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology (ICGON), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pavel Havelka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bata Hospital Zlin, Czech Republic, CEEGOG, Zlin, Czech Republic
| | - Barbara Kipp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Grzegorz Szewczyk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Robert Toth
- Oncology Institute of East Slovakia, Košice, Slovakia
| | - Juan Carlos Staringer
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Español de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Pluvio J Coronado
- Departamento de Obstetricia y Ginecología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert Poka
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Rene Laky
- Gynaecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Mathieu Luyckx
- Department of Gynaecology, Universite catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Maxime Fastrez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Pierre University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Ladislav Dusek
- Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Alicia Hernandez
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, La Paz University Hospital-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Cibula
- Gynaecologic Oncology Centre, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, CEEGOG, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, Arévalo-Serrano J, Căpîlna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Aliyev S, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujić G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Minguez JA, Vázquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Chacon E, Alcazar JL. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2020; 30:1269-1277. [PMID: 32788262 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer has demonstrated in recent publications worse outcomes than open surgery. The primary objective of the SUCCOR study, a European, multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study was to evaluate disease-free survival in patients with stage IB1 (FIGO 2009) cervical cancer undergoing open vs minimally invasive radical hysterectomy. As a secondary objective, we aimed to investigate the association between protective surgical maneuvers and the risk of relapse. METHODS We obtained data from 1272 patients that underwent a radical hysterectomy by open or minimally invasive surgery for stage IB1 cervical cancer (FIGO 2009) from January 2013 to December 2014. After applying all the inclusion-exclusion criteria, we used an inverse probability weighting to construct a weighted cohort of 693 patients to compare outcomes (minimally invasive surgery vs open). The first endpoint compared disease-free survival at 4.5 years in both groups. Secondary endpoints compared overall survival among groups and the impact of the use of a uterine manipulator and protective closure of the colpotomy over the tumor in the minimally invasive surgery group. RESULTS Mean age was 48.3 years (range; 23-83) while the mean BMI was 25.7 kg/m2 (range; 15-49). The risk of recurrence for patients who underwent minimally invasive surgery was twice as high as that in the open surgery group (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.35 to 3.15; P=0.001). Similarly, the risk of death was 2.42-times higher than in the open surgery group (HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.30 to 4.60, P=0.005). Patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery using a uterine manipulator had a 2.76-times higher hazard of relapse (HR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.75 to 4.33; P<0.001) and those without the use of a uterine manipulator had similar disease-free-survival to the open surgery group (HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 0.79 to 3.15; P=0.20). Moreover, patients that underwent minimally invasive surgery with protective vaginal closure had similar rates of relapse to those who underwent open surgery (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.15 to 2.59; P<0.52). CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive surgery in cervical cancer increased the risk of relapse and death compared with open surgery. In this study, avoiding the uterine manipulator and using maneuvers to avoid tumor spread at the time of colpotomy in minimally invasive surgery was associated with similar outcomes to open surgery. Further prospective studies are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis Chiva
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Nerea Martin-Calvo
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mario Malzoni
- Center for Advanced Endoscopic Gynecologic Surgery, Avellino, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Tayfun Toptas
- Saglik Bilimleri University Antalya Research and Training Hospital, Antalya, Turkey
| | - David Cibula
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Dilyara Kaidarova
- Oncogynecology, Kazahskij Naucno-issledovatel'skij Institut Onkologii i Radiologii, Almaty, Kazakhstan
| | - Mehmet Mutlu Meydanli
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zekai Tahir Burak Women's Health Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Dmytro Golub
- LISOD - Israeli Oncological Hospital, Kyiv, Ukraine
| | - Anna Myriam Perrone
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico SantOrsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Robert Poka
- Obstetrics and Gynecology; Unit of Gynecologic Oncology; Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | | | - Marcin A Jedryka
- Oncological Gynecology, Lower Silesian Cancer Center, Wroclaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Frederic Goffin
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Dimitrios Haidopoulos
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alexandra Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Robert Jach
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Igor Berlev
- North-Western State Medical University. N.N. Petrov Research Institute of Oncology, St Petersburg, Russia
| | | | | | | | - Minna M Maenpaa
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - Vladyslav Sukhin
- Oncogynecology, Grigorev Institute for Radiology, Kharkiv, Ukraine
| | | | - Robert Fruscio
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.,Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | - Kersti Kukk
- North Estonia Medical Centre, Tallinn, Estonia
| | - Jordi Ponce
- Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Catalunya, Spain
| | - Jose Angel Minguez
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | | - Teresa Castellanos
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Enrique Chacon
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Juan Luis Alcazar
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine; University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nemejcova K, Kocian R, Kohler C, Jarkovsky J, Klat J, Berjon A, Pilka R, Sehnal B, Gil-Ibanez B, Lupo E, Petiz A, Arencibia Sanchez O, Kascak P, Martinelli F, Buda A, Presl J, Barahona M, van Lonkhuijzen L, Szatkowski W, Minar L, Pakiz M, Havelka P, Zorrero C, Misiek M, Snyman LC, Wydra D, Vergote I, Vinnytska A, Redecha M, Michal M, Tingulstad S, Kipp B, Szewczyk G, Toth R, de Santiago Garcia FJ, Coronado Martin PJ, Poka R, Tamussino K, Luyckx M, Fastrez M, Staringer JC, Germanova A, Plaikner A, Bajsova S, Dundr P, Mallmann-Gottschalk N, Cibula D. Central Pathology Review in SENTIX, A Prospective Observational International Study on Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Patients with Early-Stage Cervical Cancer (ENGOT-CX2). Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12051115. [PMID: 32365651 PMCID: PMC7281480 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Revised: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 04/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The quality of pathological assessment is crucial for the safety of patients with cervical cancer if pelvic lymph node dissection is to be replaced by sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy. Central pathology review of SLN pathological ultrastaging was conducted in the prospective SENTIX/European Network of Gynaecological Oncological Trial (ENGOT)-CX2 study. All specimens from at least two patients per site were submitted for the central review. For cases with major or critical deviations, the sites were requested to submit all samples from all additional patients for second-round assessment. From the group of 300 patients, samples from 83 cases from 37 sites were reviewed in the first round. Minor, major, critical, and no deviations were identified in 28%, 19%, 14%, and 39% of cases, respectively. Samples from 26 patients were submitted for the second-round review, with only two major deviations found. In conclusion, a high rate of major or critical deviations was identified in the first round of the central pathology review (28% of samples). This reflects a substantial heterogeneity in current practice, despite trial protocol requirements. The importance of the central review conducted prospectively at the early phase of the trial is demonstrated by a substantial improvement of SLN ultrastaging quality in the second-round review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristyna Nemejcova
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.N.); (P.D.)
| | - Roman Kocian
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (R.K.); (A.G.)
| | - Christhardt Kohler
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, 22763 Hamburg, Germany; (C.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Jiri Jarkovsky
- Institute for Biostatistics and Analyses, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 62500 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | - Jaroslav Klat
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.B.)
| | - Alberto Berjon
- Department of Pathology, La Paz University Hospital, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
- Molecular Pathology and Therapeutic Targets Group, IdiPAZ, 28046 Madrid, Spain
| | - Radovan Pilka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University, University Hospital Olomouc, 77520 Olomouc, Czech Republic;
| | - Borek Sehnal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bulovka Hospital, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, 18081 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Blanca Gil-Ibanez
- Unit of Gynecological Oncology, Institute Clinic of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology (ICGON), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Ezequiel Lupo
- Department of Pathology, Institute of Oncology Angel H. Roffo, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires Autonomous City 1214, Argentina;
| | - Almerinda Petiz
- Department of Gynecology, Francisco Gentil Portuguese Oncology Institute, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal;
| | - Octavio Arencibia Sanchez
- Departments of Gynecologic Oncology, University Hospital of the Canary Islands, 35016 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain;
| | - Peter Kascak
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty Hospital Trencin, 91171 Trencin, Slovakia;
| | - Fabio Martinelli
- IRCCS Foundation National Cancer Institute in Milan, 20133 Milan, Italy;
| | - Alessandro Buda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Unit of Gynecologic Oncology Surgery, San Gerardo Hospital, 20900 Monza, Italy;
| | - Jiri Presl
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Pilsen, Charles University, 30460 Prague, Czech Republic;
| | - Marc Barahona
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Biomedical Research Institute of Bellvitge, University of Barcelona, 08907 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Luc van Lonkhuijzen
- Center for Gynecologic Oncology, Academic Medical Centre, 1100DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Wiktor Szatkowski
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Centre of Oncology, M. Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Institute, Cracow Department, 31-115 Cracow, Poland;
| | - Lubos Minar
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, 60200 Brno, Czech Republic;
| | - Maja Pakiz
- University Clinic for Gynaecology and Perinatology, University Medical Centre Maribor, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia;
| | | | - Cristina Zorrero
- Gynecology Department, Instituto Valenciano de Oncología (IVO), 46009 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Marcin Misiek
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Holycross Cancer Center, 25-734 Kielce, Poland;
| | - Leon Cornelius Snyman
- Gynaecologic Oncology Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0001, South Africa;
| | - Dariusz Wydra
- Department of Gynecology, Gynecologic Oncology and Gynecologic Endocrinology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-402 Gdansk, Poland;
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, 3000 Leuven, Belgium;
| | - Alla Vinnytska
- LISOD-Israeli Oncological Hospital, 08720 Plyuty, Ukraine;
| | - Mikulas Redecha
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Comenius University, 82101 Bratislava, Slovakia;
| | - Martin Michal
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Ceske Budejovice, JSC, 37001 Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic;
| | | | - Barbara Kipp
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, 6000 Lucerne, Switzerland;
| | - Grzegorz Szewczyk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Mother and Child, 01-211 Warsaw, Poland;
| | - Robert Toth
- Oncology Institute of East Slovakia, 04191 Košice, Slovakia;
| | | | | | - Robert Poka
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary;
| | | | - Mathieu Luyckx
- Department of Gynecology, Universite catholique de Louvain, Cliniques Universitaires St Luc, 1200 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Maxime Fastrez
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Pierre University Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 1000 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Juan Carlos Staringer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital Español de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 2975, Argentina;
| | - Anna Germanova
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (R.K.); (A.G.)
| | - Andrea Plaikner
- Department of Special Operative and Oncologic Gynaecology, Asklepios-Clinic Hamburg, 22763 Hamburg, Germany; (C.K.); (A.P.)
| | - Sylva Bajsova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital Ostrava, 708 52 Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic; (J.K.); (S.B.)
| | - Pavel Dundr
- Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (K.N.); (P.D.)
| | | | - David Cibula
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, 12000 Prague, Czech Republic; (R.K.); (A.G.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +420-224967451
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Takacs P, Sipos AG, Kozma B, Cunningham TD, Larson K, Lampé R, Poka R. The Effect of Vaginal Microablative Fractional CO
2
Laser Treatment on Vaginal Cytology. Lasers Surg Med 2020; 52:708-712. [DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Takacs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Eastern Virginia Medical School 825 Fairfax Avenue, Suite 526 Norfolk Virginia 23507‐2007
| | - Attila Gergely Sipos
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine Pf. 400 H‐4002 Debrecen Hungary
| | - Bence Kozma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine Pf. 400 H‐4002 Debrecen Hungary
| | - Tina D. Cunningham
- The Center for Health Analytics and Discovery 825 Fairfax Avenue Suite 526 Norfolk Virginia 23507‐2007
| | - Kindra Larson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Eastern Virginia Medical School 825 Fairfax Avenue, Suite 526 Norfolk Virginia 23507‐2007
| | - Rudolf Lampé
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine Pf. 400 H‐4002 Debrecen Hungary
| | - Robert Poka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine Pf. 400 H‐4002 Debrecen Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dvorská D, Braný D, Nagy B, Grendár M, Poka R, Soltész B, Jagelková M, Zelinová K, Lasabová Z, Zubor P, Danková Z. Aberrant Methylation Status of Tumour Suppressor Genes in Ovarian Cancer Tissue and Paired Plasma Samples. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20174119. [PMID: 31450846 PMCID: PMC6747242 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20174119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 08/17/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease and its formation is affected by many epidemiological factors. It has typical lack of early signs and symptoms, and almost 70% of ovarian cancers are diagnosed in advanced stages. Robust, early and non-invasive ovarian cancer diagnosis will certainly be beneficial. Herein we analysed the regulatory sequence methylation profiles of the RASSF1, PTEN, CDH1 and PAX1 tumour suppressor genes by pyrosequencing in healthy, benign and malignant ovarian tissues, and corresponding plasma samples. We recorded statistically significant higher methylation levels (p < 0.05) in the CDH1 and PAX1 genes in malignant tissues than in controls (39.06 ± 18.78 versus 24.22 ± 6.93; 13.55 ± 10.65 versus 5.73 ± 2.19). Higher values in the CDH1 gene were also found in plasma samples (22.25 ± 14.13 versus 46.42 ± 20.91). A similar methylation pattern with positive correlation between plasma and benign lesions was noted in the CDH1 gene (r = 0.886, p = 0.019) and malignant lesions in the PAX1 gene (r = 0.771, p < 0.001). The random forest algorithm combining methylation indices of all four genes and age determined 0.932 AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve) prediction power in the model classifying malignant lesions and controls. Our study results indicate the effects of methylation changes in ovarian cancer development and suggest that the CDH1 gene is a potential candidate for non-invasive diagnosis of ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Dvorská
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
| | - Dušan Braný
- Division of Molecular Medicine, Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia.
| | - Bálint Nagy
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Marián Grendár
- Bioinformatic Unit, Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
| | - Robert Poka
- Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Beáta Soltész
- Department of Human Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen, H-4032 Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Marianna Jagelková
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Martin University Hospital, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
- Division of Oncology, Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
| | - Katarína Zelinová
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Martin University Hospital, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
- Division of Oncology, Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
| | - Zora Lasabová
- Division of Oncology, Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
| | - Pavol Zubor
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Martin University Hospital, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
| | - Zuzana Danková
- Division of Oncology, Biomedical Center Martin, Jessenius Faculty of Medicine in Martin, Comenius University in Bratislava, 036 01 Martin, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sipos AG, Kozma B, Poka R, Larson K, Takacs P. The Effect of Fractional CO
2
Laser Treatment on the Symptoms of Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions: Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory‐20 Questionnaire. Lasers Surg Med 2019; 51:882-886. [DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Attila Gergely Sipos
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine 98 Nagyerdei krt 4032 Debrecen Hungary
| | - Bence Kozma
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine 98 Nagyerdei krt 4032 Debrecen Hungary
| | - Robert Poka
- Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine 98 Nagyerdei krt 4032 Debrecen Hungary
| | - Kindra Larson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive SurgeryEastern Virginia Medical School 825 Fairfax Avenue, Suite 526 Norfolk Virginia 23507‐2007
| | - Peter Takacs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive SurgeryEastern Virginia Medical School 825 Fairfax Avenue, Suite 526 Norfolk Virginia 23507‐2007
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Orosz L, Orosz G, Veress L, Dosa D, Orosz L, Arany I, Fabian A, Medve L, Pap K, Karanyi Z, Toth Z, Poka R, Than NG, Torok O. Screening for preeclampsia in the first trimester of pregnancy in routine clinical practice in Hungary. J Biotechnol 2019; 300:11-19. [PMID: 31055145 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the contribution of different factors in the Fetal Medicine Foundation algorithms for preeclampsia (PE) risk calculation during first-trimester screening in Hungary. We selected subjects for the nested case-control study from a prospective cohort of 2545 low-risk pregnancies. Eighty-two patients with PE and 82 gestational age-matched controls were included. Individual PE risk was calculated using two risk-assessing softwares. Using Astraia 2.3.1, considering maternal characteristics and biophysical parameters only, detection rates (DR) were 63.6% for early-PE and 67.6% for late-PE. When we added placenta associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) to the risk calculation, DRs decreased to 54.5% and 64.8% respectively. Using Astraia 2.8.2 with maternal characteristics and biophysical parameters resulted in the DRs of 63.6% (early-PE) and 56.3% (late-PE). If we added PAPP-A to the risk calculation, DRs improved to 72.7% and 54.9%. The addition of placental growth factor (PlGF) did not increase detection rates in either calculation. In conclusion, using maternal characteristics, biophysical parameters, and PAPP-A, an acceptable screening efficacy could be achieved for early-PE during first-trimester screening. Since PlGF did not improve efficacy in our study, we suggest setting new standard curves for PlGF in Eastern European pregnant women, and the evaluation of novel biochemical markers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laszlo Orosz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre, Nagyerdei korut 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Gergo Orosz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre, Nagyerdei korut 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Lajos Veress
- Department of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre, Nagyerdei korut 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Diana Dosa
- Department of Family and Occupational Medicine, Faculty of Public Health and Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre, Moricz Zsigmond krt. 22, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Laszlo Orosz
- Departement of Obststrics and Gynaecology, Andras Josa County and Teaching Hospital, Szent Istvan ut. 68, 4400, Nyiregyhaza, Hungary.
| | - Ibolya Arany
- Departement of Neonatology, Andras Josa County and Teaching Hospital, Szent Istvan ut. 68, 4400, Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
| | - Antal Fabian
- Departement of Obststrics and Gynaecology, Andras Josa County and Teaching Hospital, Szent Istvan ut. 68, 4400, Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
| | - Laszlo Medve
- Departement of Obststrics and Gynaecology, Andras Josa County and Teaching Hospital, Szent Istvan ut. 68, 4400, Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
| | - Karoly Pap
- Departement of Obststrics and Gynaecology, Andras Josa County and Teaching Hospital, Szent Istvan ut. 68, 4400, Nyiregyhaza, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Karanyi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre, Nagyerdei korut 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Zoltan Toth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre, Nagyerdei korut 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Robert Poka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre, Nagyerdei korut 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Nandor Gabor Than
- Systems Biology of Reproduction Lendulet Research Group, Institute of Enzymology, Research Centre for Natural Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Magyar Tudosok krt. 2, 1117, Budapest, Hungary; Maternity Private Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kiralyhago ter 8, 1126, Budapest, Hungary; First Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Ulloi ut 26, 1085, Budapest, Hungary.
| | - Olga Torok
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Debrecen Medical and Health Science Centre, Nagyerdei korut 98, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Takacs P, Kozma B, Erdodi B, Jakab A, Larson K, Poka R. Zinc-containing Vaginal Moisturizer Gel Improves Postmenopausal Vulvovaginal Symptoms: A Pilot Study. J Menopausal Med 2019; 25:63-68. [PMID: 31080791 PMCID: PMC6487289 DOI: 10.6118/jmm.2019.25.1.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Revised: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Although vaginal estrogen is highly effective in alleviating genitourinary symptoms of menopause (GSM), some women are reluctant to use hormonal treatment. Our aim was to evaluate the effect of a zinc-containing vaginal moisturizer gel on GSM. Methods Women with GSM were enrolled. Patients were asked to use the vaginal gel daily for 2 weeks. Vaginal Health Index (VHI) was calculated. Visual analogue scale (VAS) was obtained on vaginal pain, dryness, burning, itching, dyspareunia and dysuria before and 2 weeks after the completion of treatment. Vaginal cytology was obtained. Vulvovaginal symptom questionnaire (VSQ-21) was used to assess subjective symptoms. Results Thirty-seven women with GSM participated in the study. The VHI improved significantly (mean ± standard deviation, 13 ± 4 before vs. 17 ± 4 after treatment, P < 0.01). The patient reported VAS combined score was significantly lower after the treatment (18 ± 14 before vs. 7 ± 12 after treatment, P < 0.01). The largest improvement occurred in vaginal dryness. The maturation value did not change significantly. There were no signs of inflammation on vaginal cytology. VSQ-21 combined scores also improved significantly (7.9 ± 5.5 before vs. 2.7 ± 3.6 after the intervention, P < 0.01). Side effects were rare and minor. Conclusions Novel zinc-containing vaginal moisturizer gel significantly improves postmenopausal vulvovaginal symptoms without serious side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Takacs
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Bence Kozma
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Balazs Erdodi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Attila Jakab
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Kindra Larson
- Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA
| | - Robert Poka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Debrecen Faculty of Medicine, Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kozma B, Larson K, Scott L, Cunningham TD, Abuhamad A, Poka R, Takacs P. Association between pelvic organ prolapse types and levator-urethra gap as measured by 3D transperineal ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37:2849-2854. [PMID: 29672905 DOI: 10.1002/jum.14644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Revised: 02/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the association between pelvic organ prolapse (POP) types and levator-urethra gap (LUG) as measured by 3-dimensional transperineal tomographic ultrasound. METHODS A retrospective study was carried out on 98 women with symptomatic POP. Three-dimensional transperineal tomographic ultrasound images and POP quantification coordinates were reviewed. Each vaginal compartment was staged for the degree of prolapse, and total number of involved compartments identified. LUG was measured on 3-dimensional tomographic sonograms as the distance between the center of the urethra and the levator insertion bilaterally. Based on prior studies, an abnormal LUG of 25 mm or greater indicated levator avulsion. The LUG and the presence or absence of unilateral/bilateral avulsions was analyzed with reference to the clinical diagnosis of prolapse (single versus multicompartment, and mild [stage II] versus severe [stage III-IV]). Generalized logit models were used to evaluate the association between avulsion and prolapse type and stage. RESULTS The LUG was substantially larger in women with multicompartment compared to single-compartment POP (28.9 ± 4.1 mm versus 22.7 ± 4.1 mm, P < .01). Similarly, LUG was substantially larger in women with severe (stage III-IV) compared to mild (stage II) POP (28.8 ± 4.7 mm versus 23.3 ± 4.5 mm, P < .01). Women with severe prolapse were 32 times more likely than women with mild prolapse to have bilateral levator avulsion. Those with POP involving all 3 vaginal compartments were 76 times more likely than single-compartment POP to have bilateral levator avulsions. CONCLUSIONS Bilateral levator ani avulsion as diagnosed by LUG measurements of 25 mm or greater at rest is associated with multicompartment, severe prolapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bence Kozma
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Kindra Larson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - Lauren Scott
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - Tina D Cunningham
- The Center for Health Analytics and Discovery, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - Alfred Abuhamad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| | - Robert Poka
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Peter Takacs
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Toth L, Nagy B, Mehes G, Laszlo E, Molnar PP, Poka R, Hernadi Z. Cell adhesion molecule profiles, proliferation activity and p53 expression in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer induced malignant ascites-Correlation of tissue microarray and cytology microarray. Pathol Res Pract 2018; 214:978-985. [PMID: 29801775 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2018] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/15/2018] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peritoneal dissemination accompanied by ascites formation is common in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Adhesion molecules are crucial in metastatic spread and the latter involves epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). This study aimed at: (1) clarifying whether E-cadherin and β-catenin expression and proliferative activity in metastatic ovarian cancer are inter-related; (2) Identifying possible correlations between cell adhesion molecular expression profiles, the proliferative activity and p53 expression of tumor cells and tumor grade and stage; (3) testing the cytology microarray (CMA) technique in analyzing metastasis formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS Both tumorous and ascitic samples from 27 EOC patients were examined by using tissue microarray (TMA) and cytology microarray (CMA), respectively. CMA blocks were constructed using cores from each cell block of the ascitic specimens. Expression of E-cadherin, β-catenin, Ki-67 and p53 was immunohistochemically detected both in TMA and CMA blocks. RESULTS E-cadherin expression was higher in ascitic cells than in primary tumor cells (p = .294). β-catenin expression was significantly lower in ascitic cells than in primary tumor cells (p = .006). Expression of Ki-67 was lower and expression of p53 was higher in primary tumors than in ascitic cells, for p53 the difference was significant (p = .001). Both Ki-67 and p53 expression elevated significantly in high-grade primary tumor cells and in ascites cells (p = .039, and p = .004, respectively). CONCLUSION Epithelial-mesenchymal transition- mesenchymal-epithelial transition is suggested as the best descriptive term for our IHC observations which accompany increased proliferative activity of ascitic cells. The CMA method is an adequate and reliable method for the analysis of ascitic tumor cells disseminating from ovarian malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laszlo Toth
- Department of Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Debrecen, Hungary.
| | - Bence Nagy
- Department of Pathology, University of Szeged, Hungary
| | - Gabor Mehes
- Department of Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Eszter Laszlo
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Peter Pal Molnar
- Department of Pathology, Clinical Centre, University of Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Robert Poka
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Centre, University of Debrecen, Hungary
| | - Zoltan Hernadi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Centre, University of Debrecen, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Orosz M, Jakab A, Poka R, Csehely S, Deli T. Special aspects of pregnancy care in PCOS patients. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.217] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
17
|
Farkas E, Papp EK, Csehely S, Orosz M, Deli T, Molnar Z, Poka R, Jakab A. Laboratory and etiology characteristics of PCOS phenotypes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
18
|
Csehely S, Kovacs A, Orosz M, Deli T, Farkas E, Bacsko G, Poka R, Jakab A. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction and natural conception. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.07.291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
19
|
Poka R, Czegledy J, Hernadi Z, Gergely L, Lampe L. Stage related detection rate of human papillomavirus DNA in invasive cervical cancer. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2009. [DOI: 10.3109/01443619109013593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
20
|
Poka R, Hernadi Z, Lampe L. Invasive cervical carcinoma associated with pregnancy. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2009. [DOI: 10.3109/01443619309151789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
21
|
Sapy T, Poka R, Szarka K, Konya J, Huga S, Hernadi Z. Age-specific prevalence of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in a Hungarian female population with positive cytology. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2007; 138:194-8. [PMID: 17714853 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2007] [Revised: 06/25/2007] [Accepted: 07/03/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with positive screening results and persistence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection represent the population at the highest risk for developing cervical cancer. To describe the epidemiology in this high-risk population, data were collected and analysed at the referral centre for patients with positive cytology. STUDY DESIGN Between January 1997 and December 2002 the authors performed 3480 virus identifications using the Digene Hybrid Capture system in a female population with positive cytology at cervical cancer screening. Age-specific prevalence data were evaluated and compared between the age groups by running the chi(2) and Pearson chi(2) tests. Subgroup analysis was performed to estimate monthly clearance rates among eligible women with positive HR-HPV results. RESULTS Low-risk (LR), high-risk (HR) and double infections were detected in 91 cases (2.6%), 1072 cases (30.8%) and 59 cases (1.7%), respectively. A significantly higher incidence of high-, rather than low-risk HPV infections was found in all age groups (p<0.001). Also, in this high-risk population with positive screening a significant decrease was detected in the prevalence of both high- and low-risk infections beyond 35 years of age (p<0.001). However, the decline in the HR-HPV types occurred later than in the case of LR infections, and HR-HPV was of remarkable frequency in the older age groups, which might represent both incidental and prevalent cases. Subgroup analysis for estimating monthly clearance rates revealed no significant differences between the various age groups and between women with various cytology results. CONCLUSIONS In a population with positive cytology the prevalence of HPV drops with age while the relative frequency of high-risk HPV infection remains at the same level as that of the youngest age group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamas Sapy
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University of Debrecen, Medical and Health Science Center, Debrecen, Hungary.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Szluha KL, Bodgal Z, Andras C, Poka R, Fülöp B, Kósa C, Varga I. THE ROLE OF DYNAMIC MAGNETIC RESONANCE MAMMOGRAPHY IN TREATMENT PLANNING OF BREAST CANCER. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2003. [DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-00009577-200303001-00429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
|
23
|
Hernadi Z, Szarka K, Sapy T, Krasznai Z, Veress G, Poka R. The prognostic significance of HPV-16 genome status of the lymph nodes, the integration status and p53 genotype in HPV-16 positive cervical cancer: a long term follow up. BJOG 2003. [DOI: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2003.01516.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
24
|
Abstract
The role of thrombophilia in the elevated risk of thromboembolism during oral contraceptive use has been established. We performed a cross-sectional study among young women to survey the occurrence of antiphospholipid antibodies among users and non-users of oral contraceptives. Serum levels of immunoglobulin (Ig)G, IgA and IgM isotypes of anti-beta2-glycoprotein I and anticardiolipin antibodies were measured by validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay methods. Combining all types of antiphospholipid antibodies, pill-users had an elevated antibody titre more than twice as frequently as non-users (odds ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-5.1). The higher frequency of elevated antibody titre was related most commonly to IgG type anti-beta2-glycoprotein I antibodies. Oral contraceptive use increases the risk of elevated antiphospholipid antibody levels among asymptomatic young women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Szilvia Vad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Debrecen Health Science Centre, Debrecen, Hungary
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Poka R, Lampe L. Microinvasion of the amniotic cavity increases the risk of post-cesarean section endometritis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 168:275-6. [PMID: 8420339 DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9378(12)90925-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|