1
|
Aroche Gutierrez LL, McIntire DD, Lea J, LoCoco S, Miller DS. Social determinants of health in uterine carcinosarcoma. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 184:117-122. [PMID: 38309028 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE UCS survival outcome disparities by race have been reported. We aimed to investigate social determinants of health (SDOH) and their relation to survival outcomes in women at two affiliated high-volume institutions serving a racially and economically diverse population. METHODS Women diagnosed with stage I-IV UCS treated at St. Paul University Hospital, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Zale Lipshy Pavilion-William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital, and Parkland Memorial Hospital between 1992 and 2022 were eligible. Patients were identified by the local tumor registries; a retrospective study was conducted. The Pearson chi-square test was utilized for categorical variables. OS and PFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4. RESULTS Over half of the 218 patients with UCS were NHB. 35% of the patients had stage IV disease. Most HSP and NHB patients had a lower median household income* than Asian/Pacific Islander (API) or NHW (p < 0.001). Stage at diagnosis significantly affected OS (p < 0.001) but not PFS (p = 0.46) in univariate analyses. Accounting for age at diagnosis, insurance, income*, hospital, distance between hospital and home, months from diagnosis to first treatment, stage, and adjuvant therapy, race was significant for OS (p = 0.03) and PFS (p = 0.04). *Median household income by ZIP Code. CONCLUSIONS Racial disparities were seen in median household income. Most SDOH independently analyzed in this study did not affect OS. The complex interaction between race and stage in UCS survival outcomes needs further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa L Aroche Gutierrez
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of General Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Donald D McIntire
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Jayanthi Lea
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Salvatore LoCoco
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - David Scott Miller
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, and Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tang LS, Zhou YW, Wang JL, Zhang GX, Xu CH, Liu JY, Qiu M. Epidemiology, site-specific characteristics and survival of carcinosarcoma: a retrospective study based on SEER database. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e077974. [PMID: 38101828 PMCID: PMC10729011 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Carcinosarcoma (CS) is a rare and biphasic malignancy characterised by a highly invasive biological nature and poor prognosis. This study explored the epidemiology, site-specific characteristics and survival outcome of CS. DESIGN We conducted a retrospective study in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1975-2018) for primary CS. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS SEER database includes publicly available information from regional and state cancer registries in the US centres. A total of 5042 CS patients were identified. We selected the top five anatomic CS (uterus, double adnexa, lung, bladder and breast) patients for further analysis. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES Incidence was estimated by geographical region, age, sex, race, stage and primary site. Trends were calculated using joinpoint regression. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate and initial treatment were summarised. RESULTS Nearly 80% of CS occurred in the uterus and double adnexa, followed by lung, bladder and breast. The elderly and black population presented the highest age-adjusted rate of CS. The rates of distant metastasis in CS progressively increased from 1989 to 2018. Atlanta was the area with the highest incidence at 0.7 per 100 000. Pulmonary and bladder CS more frequently occurred in men and were diagnosed with regional stage. Distant metastasis was mostly found in ovary/fallopian tube CS. Radiotherapy was more commonly applied in uterine CS, while adnexa CS cases were more likely to receive chemotherapy. Multiple treatments were more used in breast CS. Pulmonary CS seemed to suffer worse CSS (median: 9.92 months), for which radiotherapy might not provide survival benefits (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 to 0.86). Compared with the common histological types in each site, CS had the shortest survival. CONCLUSIONS CS has unique clinical features in each primary site. Substantial prognosis variances exist based on tumour locations. The aggressive course is the common feature in CS at all sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lian-Sha Tang
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Yu-Wen Zhou
- Department of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jia-Ling Wang
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Guo-Xu Zhang
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chen-Hao Xu
- West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ji-Yan Liu
- Department of Biotherapy, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Meng Qiu
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bogani G, Ray-Coquard I, Concin N, Ngoi NYL, Morice P, Caruso G, Enomoto T, Takehara K, Denys H, Lorusso D, Coleman R, Vaughan MM, Takano M, Provencher DM, Sagae S, Wimberger P, Póka R, Segev Y, Kim SI, Kim JW, Candido Dos Reis FJ, Ramirez PT, Mariani A, Leitao M, Makker V, Abu-Rustum NR, Vergote I, Zannoni G, Tan D, McCormack M, Paolini B, Bini M, Raspagliesi F, Benedetti Panici P, Di Donato V, Muzii L, Colombo N, Pignata S, Scambia G, Monk BJ. Endometrial carcinosarcoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023; 33:147-174. [PMID: 36585027 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial carcinosarcoma is a rare and aggressive high-grade endometrial carcinoma with secondary sarcomatous trans-differentiation (conversion theory). The clinical presentation and diagnostic work-up roughly align with those of the more common endometrioid counterpart, although endometrial carcinosarcoma is more frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Endometrial carcinosarcoma is not a single entity but encompasses different histological subtypes, depending on the type of carcinomatous and sarcomatous elements. The majority of endometrial carcinosarcomas are characterized by p53 abnormalities. The proportion of POLE and microsatellite instablity-high (MSI-H) is directly related to the epithelial component, being approximately 25% and 3% in endometrioid and non-endometrioid components.The management of non-metastatic disease is based on a multimodal approach with optimal surgery followed by (concomitant or sequential) chemotherapy and radiotherapy, even for early stages. Palliative chemotherapy is recommended in the metastatic or recurrent setting, with carboplatin/paclitaxel doublet being the first-line regimen. Although the introduction of immunotherapy plus/minus a tyrosine kinase inhibitor shifted the paradigm of treatment of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer, patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma were excluded from most studies evaluating single-agent immunotherapy or the combination. However, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved the use of pembrolizumab and lenvatinib in endometrial cancer (all histotypes) after progression on chemotherapy and single-agent immunotherapy in MSI-H cancers. In the era of precision medicine, emerging knowledge on molecular endometrial carcinosarcoma is opening new promising therapeutic options for more personalized treatment. The present review outlines state-of-the-art knowledge and future directions for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Bogani
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Nicole Concin
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Philippe Morice
- Department of Surgery, Institut Gustave RoussT, Villejuif, France
| | - Giuseppe Caruso
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Belgium
| | - Kazuhiro Takehara
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Hannelore Denys
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | | | - Robert Coleman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Michelle M Vaughan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Canterbury Regional Cancer and Haematology Service, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Masashi Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Medical, Japan
| | | | | | - Pauline Wimberger
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Technische Universitat Dresden Medizinische Fakultat Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Yakir Segev
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carmel Hospital, Haifa, Israel
| | - Se Ik Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Pedro T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Andrea Mariani
- Department of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mario Leitao
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nadeem R Abu-Rustum
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Gynecologic Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gianfranco Zannoni
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino e di Sanità Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - David Tan
- National University Cancer Institute, Singapore
| | - Mary McCormack
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Biagio Paolini
- Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Milano, Italy
| | - Marta Bini
- Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano, Lombardia, Italy
| | | | | | - Violante Di Donato
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Sapienza of Roma, Rome, Italy
| | - Ludovico Muzii
- Department of Maternal, Infantile, and Urological Sciences, Umberto I Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Roma, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Colombo
- Medical Gynecologic Oncology Unit; University of Milan Bicocca; Milan; Italy, European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | - Sandro Pignata
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, National Cancer Institute Napels, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scambia
- Dipartimento Scienze della Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Bradley J Monk
- HonorHealth, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chapman-Davis E, Webster EM, Balogun OD, Frey MK, Holcomb K. Landmark Series on Disparities: Uterine Cancer and Strategies for Mitigation. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:48-57. [PMID: 36376567 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12765-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Longstanding racial disparities exist in uterine cancer. There is a growing body of literature documenting differences in the prevalence, diagnosis, treatment, and tumor characteristics of uterine cancer in Black women compared with White women that significantly contribute to the outcome disparity seen between the groups. This article seeks to provide an overview of racial disparities present in uterine cancer, with attention on Black women in the USA, as well as offer a review on the multifactorial etiology of the disparities described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eloise Chapman-Davis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Emily M Webster
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Onyinye D Balogun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,NewYork-Presbyterian Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Melissa K Frey
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Holcomb
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
da Silva JL, de Albuquerque LZ, Rodrigues FR, de Mesquita GG, Chaves CBP, Bonamino MH, de Melo AC. The prevalence and prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in uterine carcinosarcoma. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:1306. [PMID: 34876047 PMCID: PMC8650400 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-09026-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the prevalence and prognostic role of tumor microenvironment (TME) markers in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) through immunohistochemical characterization. METHODS The internal database of our institution was queried out for women with UCS who underwent surgery and thereafter postoperative chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel between January 2012 and December 2017. Tissue microarrays containing surgical samples of UCS from 57 women were assessed by immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2. RESULTS The mean age was 65.3 years (range, 49 to 79 years). For the epithelial component (E), CD3_E and CD4_E were highly expressed in 38 (66.7%) and in 40 (70.1%) patients, respectively, and were significantly associated with more advanced stages (p = 0.038 and p = 0.025, respectively). CD8_E was highly expressed in 42 (73.7%) patients, FOXP3_E 16 (28.1%), PD-1_E 35 (61.4%), PD-L1_E 27 (47.4%) and PD-L2_E 39 (68.4%). For the sarcomatous component (S), the prevalence of high expression was: CD3_S 6 (10.5%), CD4_S 20 (35.1%), CD8_S 44 (77.2%), FOXP3_S 8 (14%), PD-1_S 14 (24.6%), PD-L1_S 14 (24.6%) and PD-L2_S 8 (14%). By multivariate analysis, the CD8/FOXP3_S ratio (p = 0.026), CD4_E (p = 0.010), PD-L1_E (p = 0.013) and PD-L1_S (p = 0.008) markers significantly influenced progression-free survival. CD4/FOXP3_S ratio (p = 0.043), PD-1_E (p = 0.011), PD-L1_E (p = 0.036) and PD-L1_S (p = 0.028) had a significant association with overall survival. CONCLUSION Some differences in UCS clinical outcomes may be due to the subtype of TILs and PD-1/PD-L1 axis immune checkpoint signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse Lopes da Silva
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
| | - Lucas Zanetti de Albuquerque
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | - Guilherme Gomes de Mesquita
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Division of Pathology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Cláudia Bessa Pereira Chaves
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Gynecologic Oncology Section, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Martín Hernán Bonamino
- Immunology and Tumor Biology Program, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Vice-Presidency of Research and Biological Collections (VPPCB), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (FIOCRUZ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Andreia Cristina de Melo
- Division of Clinical Research and Technological Development, Brazilian National Cancer Institute, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Salman L, Brudner Y, Silverman BG, Hallak M, Bruchim I. Increased incidence with improved survival of gynecologic carcinosarcoma: A population-based study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2021; 266:106-110. [PMID: 34624737 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate trends in the incidence and survival of gynecologic carcinosarcoma over the last 35 years and to explore ethnic disparities. STUDY DESIGN Using the Israeli National Cancer Registry database, all cases of gynecologic carcinosarcoma were included (1980-2014). Age at diagnosis, patient's ethnicity and anatomical site were extracted. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASRs) were calculated for 3 time periods (1980-1994, 1995-2004 and 2005-2014). Relative survival was calculated using the Pohar-Perme method. RESULTS Overall, 935 cases of gynecologic carcinosarcomas were diagnosed during 1980-2014. The most common gynecologic anatomical site was the uterus (83.4%). Most cases (66%) were diagnosed at ages 60-80, with median age of 69 years. There was a steady increase in ASRs from 5.6 to 8.2 per million women. Throughout 1980-1994 and 2005-2014, ASRs were significantly higher in the Jewish compared to the Arab population (5.8 vs. 3.1, p = 0.02 and 8.5 vs. 5.2, p = 0.002, respectively). Relative survival rates increased throughout the study period. No significant differences were noted in relative survival between the Jewish and Arab populations (p = 0.18). CONCLUSION The incidence of gynecologic carcinosarcoma increased significantly from 1980 through 2014. Nevertheless, survival rates increased during this time, with no difference in survival between the Jewish and Arab populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lina Salman
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated with the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel.
| | - Yana Brudner
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated with the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Barbara G Silverman
- Israel National Cancer Registry, Israel Ministry of Health, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mordechai Hallak
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated with the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Ilan Bruchim
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center, Hadera, Israel, Affiliated with the Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Squires BS, Quinn TJ, Nandalur SR, Jawad MS. Adjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival when added to surgery and chemotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:2282-2294. [PMID: 34427803 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-02007-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) confers a high recurrence risk following surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT) is typically administered in all stages. The benefit of radiation therapy (RT) in UCS, when added to adjuvant CHT, is unknown. We sought to analyze the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to ascertain whether RT improves overall survival (OS) when added to surgery and CHT for UCS. METHODS SEER 18 Custom Data registries (Nov 2018 submission) were queried for uterine (ICD10 C54.1-9, C55.9) carcinosarcoma (ICD-0-3 8980-3). Patients with stage I-III UCS who underwent surgery and CHT ± RT were analyzed with univariate analysis (UVA) and multivariable analysis (MVA) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression modeling. Propensity-score matched analysis with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed to account for indication bias. Furthermore, conditional landmark analysis (minimum three-month follow-up) was performed to minimize immortal time bias. RESULTS All 1541 patients (1988-2016) underwent surgery and CHT and 54% received RT. On UVA, RT improved median and 5-year OS from 41 to 87 months and 43-55%, respectively (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.56-0.77) (p < 0.001). After IPTW adjustment, RT improved median and 5-year OS from 46 to 65 months and 46-53%, respectively (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.63-0.87) (p < 0.001). The benefit of RT remained on unadjusted and adjusted MVA and conditional landmark analysis. CONCLUSION In stage I-III UCS treated with surgery and CHT, receipt of RT is associated with OS benefit. Further prospective data are needed to investigate the RT's benefit in UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan S Squires
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA.
| | - Thomas J Quinn
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
| | - Sirisha R Nandalur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, 44344 Dequindre Rd, Sterling Heights, MI, 48314, USA
| | - M Saada Jawad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI, 48073, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beckmann K, Selva-Nayagam S, Olver I, Miller C, Buckley ES, Powell K, Buranyi-Trevarton D, Gowda R, Roder D, Oehler MK. Carcinosarcomas of the Uterus: Prognostic Factors and Impact of Adjuvant Treatment. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:4633-4645. [PMID: 34140809 PMCID: PMC8203298 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s309551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 05/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Uncertainties remain about the most effective treatment for uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), a rare but aggressive uterine cancer, due to the limited scope for randomized trials. This study investigates whether nodal excision or adjuvant therapies after hysterectomy offer a survival benefit, using multi-institutional clinical registry data from South Australia. Methods Data for all consecutive cases of UCS from 1980 to 2019 were extracted from the Clinical Cancer Registry. Clinical and treatment-related factors associated with disease-specific mortality (DSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) were determined using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, with subgroup analyses by stage. Results Median follow-up for the 140 eligible cases was 21 months. 94% underwent hysterectomy, and 72% had an additional pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). Furthermore, 16% received adjuvant chemotherapy; 11% adjuvant radiotherapy and 16% multimodal chemoradiotherapy, with an increase in the latter two modalities over time. DSM was reduced among those who underwent PLND (HR: 0.41; 95%CI: 0.23–0.74), adjuvant chemotherapy (HR: 0.39; 95%CI: 0.18–0.84) or multimodality treatment (HR: 0.11; 95%CI: 0.06–0.30) compared with hysterectomy alone for the whole cohort and for late stage disease (FIGO III/IV) but not for earlier stage disease, except for reduced DSM with multimodal therapy. Findings were similar for ACM. Conclusion Our findings indicate better survival among those who received PLND, chemotherapy and multimodal adjuvant therapy, with the latter applying to early and late stage disease. However, cautious interpretation is warranted, due to potential “indication bias” and limited power. Further research into effective treatment modalities, ideally using prospective study designs, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kerri Beckmann
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Ian Olver
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Caroline Miller
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia.,School of Public Health, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Elizabeth S Buckley
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Kate Powell
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Raghu Gowda
- Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - David Roder
- Cancer Epidemiology and Population Health Research, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Martin K Oehler
- Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chiang CY, Huang HJ, Chang WY, Yang LY, Wu RC, Wang CC, Tung HJ, Chao A, Lai CH. Adjuvant therapy and prognosis in uterine carcinosarcoma. J Formos Med Assoc 2021; 120:1977-1987. [PMID: 33992491 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2021.04.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2020] [Revised: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the prognostic factors and impact of adjuvant treatment on uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). METHODS A retrospective review of UCS patients treated between 2005 and 2019 was conducted. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 staging system was used. Multivariate stepwise Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify the independent predictors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS A total of 138 patients were eligible for descriptive analysis. Excluding 12 patients without surgery, 126 patients with adequate clinicopathologic data were included for prognostic analysis. The median follow-up for survivors was 51.8 months. 5-year OS and PFS rates for FIGO stage I, II, III, IV were 64.5% and 51.8%, 60.8% and 57.7%, 47.7% and 45.9%, 5.1% and 4.1%, respectively. By multivariate analysis, six models each for PFS and OS were formulated including highly correlated variables alternatively. Adjuvant chemoradiation was consistently selected as an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.10-0.22, all p < 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.12-0.23, all p < 0.001), while adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.33-0.41), age≥58 years (HR 1.80-1.91), stage III/IV (HR 3.36-13.34), and adnexal metastasis (HR 2.06-5.02) in three to four of the six models for OS. Stratified analyses revealed that adjuvant chemoradiation significantly improved outcome compared with adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IA patients with lymphovascular space invasion and stage IB-IV, lymph node metastasis, and adnexal metastasis. CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemoradiation was confirmed as an independent good prognostic factor, while older age, stage III/IV, and adnexal metastasis were associated with poor outcome in UCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Yuan Chiang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Huei-Jean Huang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Yang Chang
- Clinical Trial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Lan-Yan Yang
- Clinical Trial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Ren-Chin Wu
- Department of Pathology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chieh Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Jung Tung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Angel Chao
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan
| | - Chyong-Huey Lai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch, and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Gynecologic Cancer Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
The Role of Postoperative Radiotherapy for Carcinosarcoma of the Uterus. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12123573. [PMID: 33265910 PMCID: PMC7760981 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12123573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Revised: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The role of radiotherapy on carcinosarcoma, a rare malignant tumor, of the uterus is unclear. We reviewed data published from 2010 on the effects of radiotherapy on tumor control and survival in this patient group. Available data were mainly from cancer registries and suggested that radiotherapy, given either as vaginal brachytherapy (contact radiotherapy of the vagina) or external-beam radiotherapy or a combination of both, reduces the risk of recurrence and improves survival in patients with all stages of carcinosarcoma of the uterus without metastases in other organs. Abstract The role of postoperative radiotherapy delivered as external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT), vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) or a combination of both, in the management of carcinosarcoma of the uterus is not clearly defined, as only limited randomized trial data are available, indicating a reduction in locoregional recurrences after EBRT. We performed a structured review of data published from 2010. Although no relevant new data from prospective trials or meta-analyses were identified, 14 analyses of cancer registry data from the United States or Europe, focusing predominantly on the endpoint for overall survival, were identified, four of them using propensity-score matching to compare subgroups treated with vs. without radiotherapy. Although stage-by-stage data are rare, the registry analyses support the idea of a beneficial effect, especially of VBT, on overall survival in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IA patients (to a lesser extent in stage IB). For stages II to III, the data sets indicate the largest effects on overall survival for the combination of EBRT and VBT. In all stages, survival effects of radiotherapy apparently persist when given in addition to chemotherapy. Whereas some studies see the strongest survival effects in patients with positive lymph nodes, propensity-score matched data indicate an overall survival effect of radiotherapy (EBRT + VBT or VBT alone) in FIGO stages I to III regardless of lymph node surgery.
Collapse
|
11
|
Hapsari K, Bhugwandass C, van Rijn GWJ, van der Wurff AAM, van ‘t Veer M, Boll D, Vos MC, Pijlman B, Kok A, Piek JMJ. Treatment and Outcome of Patients with Uterine Carcinosarcoma in a Comprehensive Cancer Network. INDIAN JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40944-019-0362-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim
To determine clinical characteristics, treatment modalities and survival of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).
Methods
Data on treatment of UCS patients in the Comprehensive Cancer Network south region in the Netherlands between 2004 and 2014 were retrospectively evaluated.
Results
Data of 62 patients with UCS were retrieved. Mean age at diagnosis was 69.2 years (45–95 years). Data of six patients were excluded because they did not receive any treatment. Of the 56 patients included in this study, 57.1% presented with early-stage (FIGO I–II) disease and 42.9% with late-stage (FIGO III–IV) disease. 46.9% of the patients with FIGO early-stage disease received only surgical treatment, whereas 9.4% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 43.8% received adjuvant radiotherapy. Median DFS in patients with early-stage disease was 47.0 months (17.5–72.0). Adjuvant therapy did not seem to alter prognosis (p = 0.261). 16.7% of the patients with late-stage disease received only surgical treatment, 12.5% received only chemotherapy, whereas 50% received adjuvant chemotherapy and 20.8% adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery. Median DFS in late-stage disease was 8.5 months (2.5–23.5). Adjuvant therapy did not seem to alter prognosis (p = 0.30).
Conclusion
UCS with both FIGO stages I–II and III–IV has a dismal prognosis. The addition of adjuvant treatment did not seem to increase survival.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rojas C, Tian C, Powell MA, Chan JK, Bateman NW, Conrads TP, Rocconi RP, Jones NL, Shriver CD, Hamilton CA, Maxwell GL, Casablanca Y, Darcy KM. Racial disparities in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma: A population-based analysis of treatment and survival. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 157:67-77. [PMID: 32029291 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 12/31/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate racial disparities in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities. METHODS Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stage I-IV UCS or OCS between 2004 and 2014 were eligible. Differences by disease site or race were compared using Chi-square test and multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS There were 2830 NHBs and 7366 NHWs with UCS, and 280 NHBs and 2586 NHWs with OCS. Diagnosis of UCS was more common in NHBs (11.5%) vs. NHWs (3.7%) and increased with age (P < .0001). OCS diagnosis remained <5% in both races and all ages. NHBs with UCS or OCS were more common in the South and more likely to have a comorbidity score ≥ 1, low neighborhood income and Medicaid or no insurance (P < .0001). Diagnosis at stage II-IV was more common in NHBs than NHWs with UCS but not OCS. NHBs with both UCS and OCS were less likely to undergo surgery and to achieve no gross residual disease with surgery (P = .002). Risk of death in NHB vs. NHW patients with UCS was 1.38 after adjustment for demographic factors and dropped after sequential adjustment for comorbidity score, neighborhood income, insurance status, stage and treatment by 4%, 16%, 7%, 19% and 10%, respectively, leaving 43.5% of the racial disparity in survival unexplained. In contrast, risk of death in NHBs vs. NHWs with OCS was 1.19 after adjustment for demographic factors and became insignificant after adjustment for comorbidity. Race was an independent prognostic factor in UCS but not in OCS. CONCLUSIONS Racial disparities exist in characteristics, treatment and survival in UCS and OCS with distinctions that merit additional research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Rojas
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Chunqiao Tian
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Matthew A Powell
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
| | - John K Chan
- Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Nicholas W Bateman
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Thomas P Conrads
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
| | - Nathaniel L Jones
- Mitchell Cancer Institute, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, USA.
| | - Craig D Shriver
- John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Chad A Hamilton
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA; Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Center for Personalized Health, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - G Larry Maxwell
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA; Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Inova Center for Personalized Health, Falls Church, VA, USA.
| | - Yovanni Casablanca
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Kathleen M Darcy
- Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Reade CJ, Elit LM. Current Quality of Gynecologic Cancer Care in North America. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2019; 46:1-17. [PMID: 30683257 DOI: 10.1016/j.ogc.2018.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Evaluating the quality of care received by gynecologic cancer patients in the real world is essential for excellent outcomes. The recent population-based literature looking at quality of care was reviewed for all gynecologic malignancies. Outcomes are generally highest when care is provided by high-volume providers in high-volume cancer centers. Provision of care according to clinical practice guidelines has also been demonstrated to improve outcomes in many situations. Disparities exist for marginalized groups in terms of the care they receive and subsequent outcomes. Health systems need to improve care for these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare J Reade
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario L8V 5C2, Canada
| | - Laurie M Elit
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Juravinski Cancer Centre, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario L8V 5C2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Matsuo K, Takazawa Y, Ross MS, Elishaev E, Yunokawa M, Sheridan TB, Bush SH, Klobocista MM, Blake EA, Takano T, Baba T, Satoh S, Shida M, Ikeda Y, Adachi S, Yokoyama T, Takekuma M, Yanai S, Takeuchi S, Nishimura M, Iwasaki K, Johnson MS, Yoshida M, Hakam A, Machida H, Mhawech-Fauceglia P, Ueda Y, Yoshino K, Kajiwara H, Hasegawa K, Yasuda M, Miyake TM, Moriya T, Yuba Y, Morgan T, Fukagawa T, Pejovic T, Nagano T, Sasaki T, Richmond AM, Post MD, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Yoshida H, Enomoto T, Omatsu K, Ueland FR, Kelley JL, Karabakhtsian RG, Roman LD. Proposal for a Risk-Based Categorization of Uterine Carcinosarcoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3676-3684. [PMID: 30105438 PMCID: PMC7521084 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6695-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2018] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose a categorization model of uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) based on tumor cell types (carcinoma and sarcoma) and sarcoma dominance. METHODS This secondary analysis of a prior multicenter retrospective study examined 889 cases of UCS with available histologic evaluation. Based on survival outcome, cases were clustered into three groups: low-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type A, n = 96 (10.8%)], (1) low-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance and (2) high-grade carcinoma with nondominant homologous sarcoma [type B, n = 412 (46.3%)], and high-grade carcinoma with heterologous sarcoma or any sarcoma dominance [type C, n = 381 (42.9%)]. Tumor characteristics and outcome were examined based on the categorization. RESULTS Women in type C category were more likely to be older, obese, and Caucasian, whereas those in type A category were younger, less obese, Asian, and nulligravid (all P < 0.01). Type C tumors were more likely to have metastatic implants, large tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion with sarcoma cells, and higher lymph node ratio, whereas type A tumors were more likely to be early-stage disease and small (all P < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, tumor categorization was independently associated with progression-free survival (5-year rates: 70.1% for type A, 48.3% for type B, and 35.9% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01) and cause-specific survival (5-year rates: 82.8% for type A, 63.0% for type B, and 47.1% for type C, adjusted P < 0.01). CONCLUSION Characteristic differences in clinicopathological factors and outcomes in UCS imply that different underlying etiologies and biological behaviors may be present, supporting a new classification system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Yutaka Takazawa
- Department of Pathology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Esther Elishaev
- Department of Pathology, MaGee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Mayu Yunokawa
- Department of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Todd B Sheridan
- Department of Pathology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Stephen H Bush
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Merieme M Klobocista
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Tadao Takano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tohoku University, Miyagi, Japan
| | - Tsukasa Baba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuji Ikeda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takuhei Yokoyama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Satoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Iwate Medical University, Morioka, Japan
| | - Masato Nishimura
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokushima University, Tokushima, Japan
| | - Keita Iwasaki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aichi Medical University, Aichi, Japan
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Masayuki Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ardeshir Hakam
- Department of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Yoshino
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Masanori Yasuda
- Department of Pathology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Takahito M Miyake
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Takuya Moriya
- Department of Pathology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Yuba
- Department of Pathology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Terry Morgan
- Department of Pathology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | | | - Tanja Pejovic
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Tadayoshi Nagano
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kitano Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Pathology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Abby M Richmond
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Miriam D Post
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Department of Gynecology, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hiroshi Yoshida
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kohei Omatsu
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rouzan G Karabakhtsian
- Department of Pathology, University of Kentucky Medical Center, Lexington, KY, USA
- Department of Pathology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pang A, Carbini M, Moreira AL, Maki RG. Carcinosarcomas and Related Cancers: Tumors Caught in the Act of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. J Clin Oncol 2017; 36:210-216. [PMID: 29220296 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2017.74.9523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, we outline the biology and management of patients with carcinosarcomas and related malignancies, which are often included under the broader concept of sarcomatoid carcinomas. Carcinosarcomas are unusual tumors that are commonly gynecologic in origin, where they are referred to as malignant mixed Müllerian tumors, but may appear in any anatomic site. Although a variety of hypotheses have been presented as to the biphasic nature of these tumors, carcinosarcomas seem to represent the best example in human cancers of the concept of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), in which the two parts of the tumor are genomically related to one another, as opposed to the mesenchymal component that represents a second neoplasm or (benign) reactive process. In general, patients with carcinosarcomas fare worse than patients with carcinomas of the same anatomic site. Treatment paradigms for carcinosarcomas generally follow those of carcinomas of the same organ site, except where clinical trials provide more specific options. Agents that block or reverse EMT are worth examination in patients with carcinosarcoma and arguably may be even more effective in carcinomas, given evidence of dependence on EMT to generate successful metastases. Information about EMT may also inform other phase transitions in cancer, such as those between prostate or lung carcinoma and more aggressive tumors with neuroendocrine differentiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Pang
- Angela Pang, National University Health System and National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Mariana Carbini, Mount Sinai Medical Center; Andre L. Moreira, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York; and Robert G. Maki, Northwell Health Monter Cancer Center and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Lake Success, NY
| | - Mariana Carbini
- Angela Pang, National University Health System and National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Mariana Carbini, Mount Sinai Medical Center; Andre L. Moreira, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York; and Robert G. Maki, Northwell Health Monter Cancer Center and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Lake Success, NY
| | - Andre L Moreira
- Angela Pang, National University Health System and National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Mariana Carbini, Mount Sinai Medical Center; Andre L. Moreira, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York; and Robert G. Maki, Northwell Health Monter Cancer Center and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Lake Success, NY
| | - Robert G Maki
- Angela Pang, National University Health System and National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore; Mariana Carbini, Mount Sinai Medical Center; Andre L. Moreira, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York; and Robert G. Maki, Northwell Health Monter Cancer Center and Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Lake Success, NY
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yen MS, Chen JR, Wang PH, Wen KC, Chen YJ, Ng HT. Uterine sarcoma part III-Targeted therapy: The Taiwan Association of Gynecology (TAG) systematic review. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 55:625-634. [PMID: 27751406 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2016.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Uterine sarcoma is a very aggressive and highly lethal disease. Even after a comprehensive staging surgery or en block cytoreduction surgery followed by multimodality therapy (often chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy), many patients relapse or present with distant metastases, and finally die of diseases. The worst outcome of uterine sarcomas is partly because of their rarity, unknown etiology, and highly divergent genetic aberration. Uterine sarcomas are often classified into four distinct subtypes, including uterine leiomyosarcoma, low-grade uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma, high-grade uterine endometrial stromal sarcoma, and undifferentiated uterine sarcoma. Currently, evidence from tumor biology found that these tumors showed alternation and/or mutation of genomes and the intracellular signal pathway. In addition, some preclinical studies showed promising results for targeting receptor tyrosine kinase signaling, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, various kinds of growth factor pathways, Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway, transforming growth factor β/bone morphogenetic protein signal pathway, aurora kinase A, MDM2 proto-oncogene, histone deacetylases, sex hormone receptors, certain types of oncoproteins, and/or loss of tumor suppressor genes. The current review is attempted to summarize the recurrent advance of targeted therapy for uterine sarcomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Shyen Yen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Foundation of Female Cancer, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Ruei Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Peng-Hui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
| | - Kuo-Chang Wen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Jen Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Heung-Tat Ng
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Foundation of Female Cancer, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|