Analysis of oncologic and reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in apparent stage I adult ovarian granulosa cell tumors

Candidates for Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Case of Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer, a leading cause of gynecological cancer mortality, often affects women of reproductive age. Fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) has emerged as a viable option for selected patients with early-stage ovarian cancer who wish to preserve fertility. Patient and tumor selection criteria focus on preserving ovarian function and reproductive potential without compromising oncological safety. Optimal candidates are young, premenopausal women with disease confined to one ovary and favorable prognostic factors such as early FIGO stage, specific histologic subtypes, and good overall health. FSS typically involves unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy while preserving the uterus and contralateral ovary, achieving survival outcomes comparable to radical surgery in early-stage low-grade tumors. However, its application in higher-risk cases requires cautious evaluation. Multidisciplinary management, involving gynecologic oncologists and reproductive specialists, is essential for successful implementation of FSS, ensuring both oncological safety and preservation of reproductive potential. Long-term follow-up is critical to monitor recurrence and assess reproductive outcomes. Pregnancy after FSS is feasible, with timing guided by cancer type, stage, and individual circumstances. This review summarizes the current knowledge on FSS in ovarian cancer, emphasizing its relevance and the need for further research to refine patient selection and ensure optimal outcomes.

Clear cell borderline ovarian tumor: A retrospective study and literature review

OBJECTIVE

Clear cell borderline ovarian tumor is a rare subtype of borderline ovarian tumor for which the clinicopathological characteristics, management, and prognosis remain unclear. Herein, we describe the clinical features, treatment options, and prognosis of clear cell borderline ovarian tumors.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of nine patients with pathologically confirmed clear cell borderline ovarian tumors treated at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between 2006 and 2023. Data regarding the patients' clinicopathological features, management, and prognosis were analyzed. We also reviewed previously published studies in English of patients with clear cell borderline ovarian tumors who underwent fertility-sparing surgery.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis was 52 years (range, 35-72) and the median tumor size was 6.5 cm (range, 2.7-13). Seven patients had unilateral tumors and two patients had bilateral tumors. Seven patients underwent radical surgery and two patients underwent fertility-preserving surgery. All patients had stage I disease. Pathological analysis revealed synchronous endometriosis or adenomyosis in five patients. Endometrial hyperplasia with atypia was found in two of the seven patients who underwent hysterectomy. During a median follow-up time of 54 months (range, 14-200), only one patient suffered a recurrence, which was treated successfully with secondary surgery.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of clear cell borderline ovarian tumors is favorable, and fertility-sparing surgery is acceptable for young patients who may desire future pregnancies. Unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended for patients in whom ovarian cystectomy was the initial surgery.

Current status of treatment for malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors

Malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors belong to a specific type of ovarian epithelial carcinoma, and their prognosis is related to the kind of pathology. Unlike epithelial ovarian cancer, most malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors are low-grade malignant and have a good prognosis. Still, they have a tendency to recur in the long term, and the mortality rate of patients after recurrence is high. Surgery is the preferred treatment for malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors with chemotherapy, and other comprehensive treatments. Recurrent and metastatic malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors usually require systemic adjuvant chemotherapy, and hormonal or targeted therapy may be attempted on an individualized basis in cases where chemotherapy fails.

Sensitivity of frozen section analysis in patients with ovarian adult granulosa cell tumor, a multi-center study

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to demonstrate the sensitivity of frozen section for patients with adult granulosa cell tumor (AGCT) and analyze the clinico-pathological factors that may be associated with sensitivity.

MATERIAL METHODS

This is a multicenter study including data of 10 Gynecological Oncology Departments. Frozen-section results of patients who had ovarian AGCT at the final pathology report were retrospectively analyzed. The relation between clinico-pathological characteristics such as age, tumor size, Ca-125 level, presence of ascites, omental metastasis, menopausal status and peritoneal cytology, and the sensitivity of frozen section in patients with AGCT were evaluated. The sensitivity of frozen section diagnosis was determined by comparing the frozen section result with the final pathological diagnosis.

RESULTS

Frozen section results of 274 patients with AGCT were obtained. The median age of the patients was 52 years (range, 17-82 years). Totally, 144 (52.7%, n = 273) patients were postmenopausal. The median tumour size was 90 mm (range, 9-700 mm). The median preoperative Ca-125 level was 23 IU/mL (range, 2-995 IU/mL). The sensitivity of frozen section for detecting AGCT was 76.3%. Any association between the sensitivity of frozen section and menopausal status, presence of ascites, positive cytology, omental metastasis, tumor size, Ca-125 level, age could not be shown.

CONCLUSION

It is important to know the diagnosis of AGCT intraoperatively, and we demonstrated the sensitivity of frozen-section for these tumors as 76.3%.

Risk Factors and Clinical Outcomes of Recurrence in Adult Ovarian Granulosa Cell Tumors

PURPOSE

Granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) of the ovary are rare but clinically significant malignancies. Despite advances in treatment, recurrence has remained a substantial challenge. This study aimed to identify clinical outcomes and potential prognostic risk factors for recurrence in patients diagnosed with GCTs.

METHODS

In a retrospective cohort study, the ovarian cancer database of the gynecological tertiary referral cancer center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran, was searched from August 2012 to August 2023 to find GCT cases. Demographic, clinical, pathological, intervention-related factors, follow-up, and survival findings were meticulously collected. Data were analyzed using SPSS v 23.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients with GCTs, including 86 AGCT and 6 JGCT subjects, were identified. Based on further analysis of AGCT patients, most patients were ages under 50 (58.1%), clinically presented pain (32.6%), and abnormal uterine bleeding (27.9%) as the most frequent symptoms. Stages IA (64.0%) and IC (20.9%) were common. Five-year overall and progression-free survival were 98.2% and 90.8%, respectively. With a median follow-up time of 72 (0.0-180) months, disease recurrence was observed in 19 patients (23.9%), and five patients (5.4%) died of the disease. Stage IV was a hazard factor of recurrence (HR = 7.62, 95%CI (1.89-30.63); p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study provides valuable insights into the outcomes and potential risk factors for recurrence in ovarian AGCTs. It duplicates the importance of stage in the prognosis of AGCT patients and highlights the safety of fertility-sparing surgery in stage I and the lack of need to administer chemotherapy in stage IC.

Effects of different surgical extents on prognosis of patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors: a retrospective cohort study

Malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors are rare neoplasms that account for approximately 5-7% of all ovarian malignancies, and they are primarily treated with surgery. The prognosis of patients with different surgical extents remains controversial. Therefore, the effects of different surgical extents on the prognosis of patients were explored in this retrospective cohort study. Patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors who underwent surgical treatment from January 2000 to December 2019 were selected. Disease-free survival and overall survival rates were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Prognosis factors were identified by Cox regression analysis. P < 0.05 was considered a statistically significant difference. A total of 278 patients with an average age at onset of 42 (8-78) years old were enrolled. The median follow-up time was 73 months. There was no significant difference in disease-free survival and overall survival rates between patients who underwent fertility-sparing surgery and those who underwent Non-fertility-sparing surgery, and between patients underwent staging surgery and those underwent Non-staging surgery. Age < 40 years (P = 0.024), stage II-III (P = 0.038), a high CA125 level (P = 0.035) and WT-1 (+) (P = 0.016) were independent risk factors for recurrence. In conclusion, different surgical extents have no significant influence on recurrence and survival status of patients with malignant ovarian sex cord-stromal tumors.

The experıance of tertıary center for adult granulosa cell tumor: whıch factors predıct survival?

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aims to evaluate the clinical course and long-term outcomes of patients diagnosed with adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCT).

METHODS

The study analyzed a cohort of 112 AGCT patients with a median follow-up of 87 months. Data regarding disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), recurrence rates, and prognostic factors were collected and analyzed. Surgical interventions, including lymphadenectomy and cytoreductive surgery, were assessed for their impact on outcomes.

RESULTS

The study revealed favorable long-term outcomes, with a 5-year DFS of 85% and a 10-year DFS of 83%. Additionally, a 5-year OS of 100% and a 10-year OS of 96% were observed. Recurrence occurred in 13.4% of cases, with advanced stage and positive peritoneal cytology identified as independent poor prognostic factors for DFS. Lymph node involvement was rare, and routine lymphadenectomy did not improve outcomes. Conservative surgery showed comparable DFS rates to definitive surgery in early-stage disease. However, cytoreductive surgery was crucial for advanced and recurrent tumors, with complete tumor resection enhancing survival outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The study underscores the importance of vigilant follow-up and individualized treatment strategies for AGCT patients. Despite the retrospective nature of the analysis, the substantial patient cohort and meticulous surgical interventions contribute valuable insights into AGCT management. Prospective multicenter studies are warranted to further elucidate prognostic factors and optimize treatment approaches for this rare malignancy.

Current limits of conservative treatment in ovarian cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Fertility-sparing surgery in ovarian cancer is an increasing need in gynecology-oncology clinical practice because of the frequent childbearing delay in developed countries. As the evidence in literature is based on observational studies, this review focuses on summarizing the most recent and relevant evidence for the conservative management of young patients with ovarian cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Staging surgery is mandatory in epithelial ovarian tumors. In sex cord-stromal tumors, fertility-sparing surgery is only recommended in FIGO stage IA. Due to its good prognosis, conservative treatment is possible in some cases of advanced disease of germ cell tumors and borderline tumors. Cystectomy is a reasonable option in serous borderline tumors but is not recommended in other tumor subtypes. Successful conception rates after fertility-sparing surgery ranges from 30 to 60%.

SUMMARY

Fertility-sparing surgery is a well tolerated option in young women with early-stage ovarian cancer with acceptable reproductive outcomes.

Adult ovarian granulosa cell tumors: analysis of outcomes and risk factors for recurrence

OBJECTIVE

Adult granulosa cell tumors represent less than 5% of all ovarian malignancies. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinicopathological parameters and their impact on progression-free and overall survival.

METHODS

Patients with primary adult granulosa cell tumors treated in three international referral centers between July 1999 and December 2018 were included. The following data were anonymously exported from the prospective database: age at diagnosis, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, adjuvant therapy, surgical procedures, progression-free survival, and overall survival. Descriptive statistical analysis regarding tumor and treatment characteristics was performed. Survival analyses included Kaplan-Meier functions and Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR).

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients with primary adult granulosa cell tumors were included. Median age was 50 years (range 13-82). With regard to stage distribution, 54.2% (n=91) of patients were FIGO stage IA, 1.2% (n=2) were stage IB, 26.8% (n=45) were stage IC, and 17.9% (n=30) were FIGO stage II-IV. 66.7% (n=112) of patients underwent surgical restaging, of whom 17.9% (n=20) were moved to a higher stage. In addition, 36 (21.4%) patients underwent fertility-sparing surgery. After a median follow-up of 61 months (range 0-209), 10.7% of patients (n=18) had recurrent disease and 4.8% (n=8) died of disease. Five-year progression-free survival was 86.1% and estimated overall survival was 95.7%. Five-year progression-free survival was worse for patients with advanced stages (FIGO stage IA/B vs IC: HR 5.09 (95% CI 1.53 to 16.9); FIGO stage IA/B vs II-IV: HR 5.62 (95% CI 1.58 to 19.9)). Nineteen patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy had lower estimated 5-year progression-free survival compared with patients not receiving chemotherapy (49.7% vs 91.1%, p<0.001; HR 9.15 (95% CI 3.62 to 23.1)).

CONCLUSION

The prognosis of patients with primary adult granulosa cell tumors is mainly determined by FIGO stage. The outcome of patients with FIGO stage IC is comparable to those with advanced stages. Fertility-sparing surgery seems to be a safe procedure in stage IA. Our data do not support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in early and advanced stages of adult granulosa cell tumors.

Granulosa tumor: two spontaneous pregnancies after combined medico-surgical treatment: case report and review of the literature

Background

Granulosa tumor is a rare tumor that arises from the mesenchyme and the sexual cord of the ovary. The prognosis is generally excellent, and treatment is mainly based on surgery, followed by chemotherapy depending on the extension of the disease. However, “the obstetrical prognosis” is compromised.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 32-year-old Caucasian patient who was diagnosed during a primary infertility assessment with an ultrasound image of a 39 mm organic left ovarian cyst confirmed on pelvic magnetic resonance imaging with infiltration of the uterosacral space. Tumor markers, including cancer antigen 125, alpha fetoprotein, and β-human chorionic gonadotropin, were normal. Histological study of biopsies of the ovarian lesion taken during exploratory laparoscopy confirmed the diagnosis of adult granulosa tumor. After a normal extension assessment including a thoracoabdominopelvic computed tomography scan and a positron emission tomography scan, the patient underwent complete conservative surgery and the disease was classified as stage Ic. Three cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy according to the “BEP” protocol combining bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin were performed after oocyte cryopreservation. After a 5-year follow-up period, the patient had no sign of tumor progression and had two spontaneous pregnancies, the first occurring 3 months after the end of chemotherapy and the second 14 months later.

Conclusion

Granulosa cell tumor remains a rare tumor whose management considerably compromises fertility and reduces the chances of having a spontaneous pregnancy. The particularity of our observation is that the diagnosis of the granulosa tumor was made following a primary infertility assessment and that the patient had two spontaneous pregnancies 3 months after the end of a medico-surgical treatment known to be very gonadotoxic.

Fertility Sparing Surgery in Young Woman With Granulosa Cell Tumor Followed by a Successful Pregnancy

An uncommon form of cancer known as a granulosa cell tumor (GCT) arises from ovarian sex cord cells that produce estrogen. The goal of conservative surgery in cancer is to retain organ functions while avoiding severe excision wherever possible. In oncologic gynecological surgery, fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) is a technique that tries to preserve the uterus and ovarian tissue. A 26-year-old woman with nulligravida presented with the main complaints of pain in the right iliac fossa for 10 to 15 days and fullness in the abdomen for one month, along with a change in appetite and noticeable weight loss. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) revealed a large, well-defined, multiloculated, solid cystic mass with altered signal intensity. On exploratory laparotomy, an intraoperatively left ovarian cystic mass was seen. The ovarian mass was histopathologically diagnosed as a sex cord tumor of the ovary, with characteristics compatible with adult GCT. Disregarding the follow-up advice on discharge four months later, the patient conceived spontaneously and gave birth to a male child via emergency lower segment cesarean section. In GCTs that have not spread beyond the ovary or in people who have had relapses of the disease, FSS created the groundwork for conception and appeared safe. In the lack of any compelling supporting evidence, the line of care of terminal surgery should always be thoroughly discussed with the patient and advised for women after their families are complete.

Analysis of the Safety and Pregnancy Outcomes of Fertility-sparing Surgery in Ovarian Malignant Sex Cord-stromal Tumours: A Multicentre Retrospective Study

AIMS

To assess the difference in survival between fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) and radical surgery and explore pregnancy outcomes after FSS in stage I malignant sex cord-stromal tumours (MSCSTs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We carried out a multicentre retrospective cohort study on patients who were diagnosed with MSCSTs and the tumour was confined to one ovary. The patients were divided into FSS and radical surgery groups. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance variables between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the difference in disease-free survival (DFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to find risk factors of DFS. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess risk factors of pregnancy.

RESULTS

In total, 107 patients were included, of whom 54 (50.5%) women underwent FSS and 53 (49.5%) received radical surgery. After IPTW, a pseudo-population of 208 was determined and all of the covariates were well balanced. After a median follow-up time of 50 months (range 7-156 months), 10 patients experienced recurrence and two died. There was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups, both in unweighted (P = 0.969) or weighted cohorts (P = 0.792). In the weighted cohort, stage IC (P = 0.014), tumour diameter >8 cm (P = 0.003), incomplete staging surgery (P = 0.003) and no adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001) were the four high-risk factors associated with a shorter DFS. Among 14 patients who had pregnancy desire, 11 (78.6%) women conceived successfully; the live birth rate was 76.9%. In univariate analysis, only adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.009) was associated with infertility.

CONCLUSIONS

On the premise of complete staging surgery, FSS is safe and feasible in early stage MSCSTs with satisfactory reproductive outcomes.

Use of staging for sex cord stromal tumours

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sex cord-stromal tumours (SCSTs) are rare ovarian cancers. As in the literature, only small case series or case reports are published, gathering solid evidence about their management is challenging. Surgery plays a pivotal role, and accurate staging is one of the most important prognostic factors. This review focuses on the current evidence for surgical staging in the management of SCSTs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Staging procedures have been inferred by epithelial ovarian cancers; however, they are often only partially performed, and most SCSTs therefore end up incompletely staged, raising the issue of the need for restaging or further treatments. In addition, some parts of the staging procedure have been questioned over the years, and lymphadenectomy is now considered unnecessary for SCSTs.The generally favourable prognosis of SCSTs, the introduction of minimally invasive surgery and fertility-sparing approaches is empowering the question of which staging procedures are beneficial for these patients. We reviewed the role of each staging procedure proposed by the guidelines in light of new scientific updates.

SUMMARY

Surgical staging should always be performed. It includes peritoneal samplings (peritoneal washing, multiple peritoneal biopsies, omental biopsy and biopsy of any suspicious area), whereas lymphadenectomy could be omitted. Laparoscopy may be considered a feasible approach.

Analysis of Outcomes and Prognostic Factors after Fertility-Sparing Surgery in Patients with Early Stage Juvenile Granulosa Cell Tumor of the Ovary: Experience from a Tertiary Center

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to analyze the oncological outcomes and prognostic factors in patients with early-stage juvenile granulosa cell tumor (JGCT) who underwent fertility-sparing surgery.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

All patients with early-stage JGCT who underwent fertility-sparing surgery between January 1995 and December 2017 were reviewed retrospectively.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The risk factors for recurrence and death in patients with early-stage JGCT were identified.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were eligible for the current study. The median age was 17 years (range: 4-30 years), and 10 patients were premenarchal. Nine patients were International Federation of Obstetrics and Gynecology stage IA, and 26 were stage IC. Eight subjects underwent complete staging, whereas 28 had no staging at their initial surgery. In those without initial staging, 3 patients who received initial unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) and 6 with initial cystectomy underwent secondary surgery for staging or USO with staging, respectively. At the time of the secondary staging operation, 1 of the subjects (treated with USO at initial surgery) was found to be stage III and was excluded from this study. Therefore, 8 patients underwent secondary staging surgery performed by laparoscopic surgery, and none of them suffered recurrence during follow-up. Fourteen of the 16 patients with complete staging surgery underwent lymphadenectomy, and none of them had lymph node metastasis. Thirty-one patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Eight patients had disease recurrence after a median follow-up time of 51 months (range: 6-229 months), with a median time to recurrence of 4.5 months (range: 2-52 months). Six patients died of their disease. The 5-year disease-free and overall survival rates were 74.8% and 84.3%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that incomplete staging surgery was associated with increased risk of recurrence (P = 0.029). Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with disease-free survival. Four patients had a total of 6 pregnancies, resulting in 6 live births.

CONCLUSION

Complete surgical staging is recommended for early-stage JGCT, but lymph node dissection can be omitted. Laparoscopic restaging surgery is feasible for patients with incomplete staging at initial surgery. However, the prognosis of patients with relapsed JGCT remains poor.

Fertility sparing surgery in sex-cord stromal tumors: oncological and reproductive outcomes

Sex cord stromal tumors are rare neoplasms, frequently diagnosed in young women often as early-stage disease. In patients who desire to preserve fertility, when possible, unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with peritoneal surgical staging is a safe alternative to radical treatment. In this review, we analyze the available literature on the obstetrical outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery in a total of 255 patients with sex cord stromal tumors. We found that the spontaneous conception rate in granulosa cells tumor is encouraging (88.5%). In particular, juvenile granulosa cell tumors are associated with a more successful pregnancy rate than adult granulosa cells tumors (11/26 (42.3%) in juvenile granulosa cells tumors compared with 28.5% in adult granulosa cell tumors, respectively.) On the other hand, the results of obstetrical outcomes in Sertoli-Leydig cells tumors are less promising (7/36 (19.4%)). Unfortunately, no evidence on this topic is available for sex cord tumor with annular tubules due to the low incidence. Regarding the oncological outcomes of 900 cases of sex cord stromal tumors treated conservatively, data are reassuring with comparable outcomes between patients treated with conservative and radical surgery. Given the limited available data on this rare tumor, further studies are needed to evaluate the safety of conservative approaches and to define the obstetrical outcomes in this patient population.

Oncological Prognosis and Fertility Outcomes of Different Surgical Extents for Malignant Ovarian Sex-Cord Stromal Tumors: A Narrative Review

Background

Malignant ovarian sex-cord stromal tumors (MOSCSTs) are rare neoplasms that account for approximately 5–7% of all ovarian malignancies. The majority (70%) of patients had an early stage; thus, surgery is the predominant treatment. Patients were relatively young at the onset of the tumor. Moreover, the prognosis of patients with this tumor is better than that of malignant epithelial ovarian tumors and tends to recur late with an indolent clinical course. Thus, patients may be more inclined to conservative surgical procedures. There is, however, no objective criterion for selecting a suitable surgical procedure. Clinically, surgical extent depended on the preoperative evaluations, age, and willingness of patients, and gynecologists were relatively subjective when choosing surgery. The prognosis of patients with different surgical extents is still controversial. The review aimed to summarize the impacts of different surgical extents on oncological prognosis and fertility outcomes.

Methods

The literature search was performed in PubMed (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/), and publications between January 2011 and December 2021 in English including clinical cohort studies and case reports were eligible for inclusion.

Results

We finally identified 12 large-sample retrospective studies and 18 cases of MOSCSTs. The primary surgical procedures include fertility-spring surgery (FSS), total hysterectomy with unilateral or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TAH-USO/BSO), FSS with complete staging procedure, complete staging surgery (CSS), and debulking surgery. FSS includes cystectomy (CYS), unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (USO) or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) with uterine preservation that allows for potential future assisted reproductive approaches. Complete staging procedure includes peritoneal cytologic examinations, inspections of peritoneal surfaces, random peritoneal biopsies and omentectomy. FSS with complete staging procedure means surgical procedure with uterine preservation and complete staging procedure. And, generally, CSS means TAH-BSO with complete staging procedure.

Conclusion

It can be concluded that USO can be done in young, fertility-desired patients with tumors confined to the ovary but avoid CYS. FSS with complete staging procedure is feasible among stage IC-III patients who have fertility desire. Patients can choose to have a complete surgery once their family is complete or without fertility requirements. CSS is recommended for patients with risk factors such as high stage, poor differentiation, and large tumor size and without fertility desire. A close follow-up is essential.

Current state of fertility preservation for adolescent and young adult patients with gynecological cancer

Although the incidence of the various gynecological cancers has been increasing in recent years, long-term survival is now possible for many patients thanks to advances in multimodality treatment. When treating gynecological cancer in adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients who desire future pregnancy, it is necessary to preserve the reproductive organs and their function to prevent loss of fertility. However, because treatment targets these organs, in the large majority of cases, patients must have these organs removed. In the subfield of oncofertility, treatment of the underlying disease takes priority, and the main principle is preventing delay in treatment. Close cooperation between obstetricians and gynecologists involved in reproductive medicine and oncologists involved in cancer treatment is necessary. In addition, it is important that clinicians work closely not only with other specialists but also with such medical professionals as nurses and counselors so that cancer patients of the AYA generation can be provided the support they need to fight their cancer with hope. Herein, we describe the current status of fertility-sparing therapy for AYA patients with gynecological cancer (cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, or ovarian cancer). In addition, we explain points to keep in mind during a patient's pregnancy after fertility preservation, the latest findings on assisted reproductive technology, and the challenges and prospects of fertility preservation therapy for patients with gynecologic cancer.

Fertility-Sparing Surgery for Ovarian Cancer

(1) Background: although most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergo radical surgery, patients with early-stage disease, borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) or a non-epithelial tumor could be offered fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) depending on histologic subtypes and prognostic factors. (2) Methods: we conducted a systematic review to assess the safety and fertility outcomes of FSS in the treatment of ovarian cancer. We queried the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Cochrane (“Cochrane Reviews”) databases for articles published in English or French between 1985 and 15 January 2021. (3) Results: for patients with BOT, FSS should be offered to young women with a desire to conceive, even if peritoneal implants are discovered at the time of initial surgery. Women with mucinous BOT should undergo initial unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, whereas cystectomy is an acceptable option for women with serous BOT. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) can be initiated in patients with stage I BOT if infertility persists after surgery. For patients with EOC, FSS should only be considered after staging for women with stage IA grade 1 (and probably 2, or low-grade in the current classification) serous, mucinous or endometrioid tumors. FSS could also be offered to patients with stage IC grade 1 (or low-grade) disease. For women with serous, mucinous or endometrioid high-grade stage IA or low-grade stage IC1 or IC2 EOC, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and uterine conservation could be offered to allow pregnancy by egg donation. Finally, FSS has a large role to play in patients with non- epithelial ovarian cancer, and particularly women with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors.

Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic factors of ovarian granulosa cell tumors: A JSGO-JSOG joint study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinicopathological features of ovarian granulosa cell tumors (GCTs) and to identify the prognostic factors.

METHODS

The Japanese Society of Gynecologic Oncology (JSGO) conducted an observational retrospective cohort study of women with GCTs enrolled in the Gynecological Tumor Registry of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology (JSOG) between 2002 and 2015. Clinicopathological features, including lymph node metastasis, were evaluated. In addition, we performed a prognostic analysis of patients between 2002 and 2011 for whom survival data were available. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.

RESULTS

We identified 1426 patients with GCTs. Of the 222 patients who underwent lymph node dissection, 10 (4.5%) had lymph node metastasis. The incidence of lymph node metastasis in patients with pT1, pT2, and pT3 was 2.1%, 13.3%, and 26.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). Prognostic analysis was performed on 674 patients. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, residual disease after initial surgery (hazard ratio (HR) = 10.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.15-34.29) and lymph node metastasis (HR = 5.58, 95% CI = 1.62-19.19) were independent risk factors for cancer-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

In the initial surgery for GCTs, lymph node dissection can be omitted if the operative finding is pT1. In cases of pT2 or higher, lymph node dissection should be considered. Debulking is critical for achieving no gross residual tumor at the end of the surgery.

Progress in the management of ovarian granulosa cell tumor: A review

Ovarian granulosa cell tumor (GCT) is a rare, low-grade malignant tumor that accounts for 70% of the sex cord-stromal tumors. It has two histopathologic types with different clinical and biologic features: adult GCT and juvenile GCT. Most women diagnosed with the adult GCT have a favorable prognosis, with a 5-year survival rate of 97%-98%, but adult GCT has a feature of late relapse; the recurrence time could be more than 20 years after diagnosis. Juvenile GCT has a survival rate of 97% in stage I and a 5-year survival rate of 0%-22% in advanced stage with earlier recurrence than adult GCT. Consequently, the scenario emphasizes the need for early diagnosis, standardized treatment protocols, and long-term follow up. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding accurate diagnosis of GCT and adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, GCT tends to occur in young women, which emphasizes the viability of fertility-sparing surgery. The current review performed a systematic literature review of 60 articles to summarize the latest advances in GCT, with an emphasis on the molecular pathogenesis and survival after fertility-sparing surgery. We found that young women with fertility-sparing surgery had a desirable reproductive and survival outcome compared with those undergoing radical surgery.

Fertility preservation in women with malignant and borderline ovarian tumors: Experience of the French ESGO-certified center and pregnancy-associated cancer network (CALG)

OBJECTIVE

To describe strategy and results of fertility preservation (FP) in patients with malignant and borderline ovarian tumors.

METHODS

Consecutive cohort study of 43 women with malignant or borderline ovarian tumors who underwent FP between February 2013 and July 2019. The study was conducted in national expert center in Tenon University Hospital, Sorbonne University: French ESGO-certified ovarian cancer center and pregnancy-associated cancer network (CALG). Main outcome measure was FP technique proposed by multidisciplinary committee, FP technique used, time after surgery, number of fragments, histology and follicle density (if ovarian tissue freezing), number of expected, retrieved and frozen oocytes (if ovarian stimulation).

RESULTS

Pathological diagnosis was malignant epithelial ovarian tumor in five women (11.6%), rare malignant ovarian tumor in 14 (32.6%), borderline in 24 (55.8%), and mostly unilateral (79.1%) and stage I (76.7%). Mean age at diagnosis was 26.8 ± 6.9 years and mean tumor size 109.7 ± 61 mm. Before FP, mean AFC was 11.0 ± 6.1 and AMH levels were 2.7 ± 4.6 ng/mL. Six ovarian tissue-freezing procedures were performed (offered to 13). Twenty-four procedures of ovarian stimulation and oocyte freezing were performed after surgical treatment for 19 women (offered to 28) with a median interval of 188 days. The mean number of mature oocytes retrieved per stimulation was 12.4 ± 12.8. At least 10 mature oocytes were frozen for 52.6% of the women. No FP was offered to five women.

CONCLUSION

Oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation should be offered to patients with malignant and borderline ovarian tumors. More data are needed to confirm ovarian stimulation and ovarian tissue grafting safety.

Outcomes after Fertility-sparing Surgery for Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To compare reproductive and oncologic outcomes of patients diagnosed with early-stage epithelial ovarian carcinoma, borderline ovarian tumors, or nonepithelial ovarian carcinoma according to receipt of fertility-sparing surgery or conventional surgery.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed was searched from January 1, 1995, to May 29, 2020.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if they (1) enrolled women of childbearing age diagnosed with ovarian cancer between the ages of 18 years and 50 years, (2) reported on oncologic and/or reproductive outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for ovarian cancer, and (3) included at least 20 patients.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

The initial search identified 995 studies. After duplicates were removed, we abstracted 980 unique citations. Of those screened, 167 publications were identified as potentially relevant, and evaluated for inclusion and exclusion criteria. The final review included 44 studies in epithelial ovarian cancer, 42 in borderline ovarian tumors, and 31 in nonepithelial ovarian carcinoma. The narrative synthesis demonstrated that overall survival does not seem to be compromised in patients undergoing fertility-sparing surgery compared with those undergoing conventional surgery, although long-term data are limited. Areas of controversy include safety of fertility-sparing surgery in the setting of high-risk factors (stage IC, grade 3, and clear cell histology), as well as type of surgery (salpingo-oophorectomy vs cystectomy). It seems that although there may be some fertility compromise after surgery, pregnancy and live-birth rates are encouraging.

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing surgery is safe and feasible in women with early-stage low-risk ovarian cancer. Pregnancy outcomes for these patients also seem to be similar to those of the general population.

Fertility preservation in rare ovarian tumors

Although gynecologic cancers usually affect older women, a significant proportion of patients with rare ovarian tumors are of reproductive age. In a young patient who presents with a pelvic mass, a primary consideration should be the probability of a malignancy. If there is any suspicion of a cancer diagnosis, the patient should be referred to a gynecologic oncologist. Key factors in clinical management include assessment of preoperative studies (physical examination, tumor markers, and imaging) to determine the likelihood of a malignancy, appropriate preoperative counseling (including discussion of fertility preservation), choice of surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open), frozen section examination by a gynecologic pathologist, and intraoperative decision making. Fortunately, the clinical features of several rare ovarian tumors are compatible with fertility preservation. These characteristics include a high proportion of stage I disease and unilateral ovarian involvement for most rare histotypes. Once a final diagnosis of a rare ovarian tumor is determined, further clinical management may include the need for further studies, possible referral to a fertility expert, consideration of further surgery (if the initial surgery was incomplete), and recommendations for postoperative therapy. This article reviews the literature on fertility preservation in the context of the treatment of several rare ovarian tumor subtypes, including malignant germ cell tumors, sex cord-stromal tumors, borderline tumors, low grade serous carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, and small cell carcinoma of the hypercalcemic type.

Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Early-Stage Cervical, Ovarian, and Endometrial Malignancies

Approximately 20% of gynecologic malignancies are diagnosed in reproductive-aged women, and standard-of-care surgical treatment often precludes future fertility. In early-stage disease, shared decision making about fertility-sparing medical and surgical approaches may give well-selected patients the opportunity to pursue their family-building goals without compromising long-term survival. Although future fertility is an important consideration for young women with cancer, rates of fertility-sparing procedures remain low. Moreover, because data on pregnancy rates and outcomes after fertility-sparing treatments are limited, it is challenging to counsel patients on realistic expectations. This review examines the critical oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing approaches in early-stage gynecologic malignancies and highlights pregnancy outcomes in this population.

Ovarian Cancer, Version 2.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology

Epithelial ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic cancer in the United States and is the country's fifth most common cause of cancer mortality in women. A major challenge in treating ovarian cancer is that most patients have advanced disease at initial diagnosis. These NCCN Guidelines discuss cancers originating in the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum, as these are all managed in a similar manner. Most of the recommendations are based on data from patients with the most common subtypes─high-grade serous and grade 2/3 endometrioid. The NCCN Guidelines also include recommendations specifically for patients with less common ovarian cancers, which in the guidelines include the following: carcinosarcoma, clear cell carcinoma, mucinous carcinoma, low-grade serous, grade 1 endometrioid, borderline epithelial, malignant sex cord-stromal, and malignant germ cell tumors. This manuscript focuses on certain aspects of primary treatment, including primary surgery, adjuvant therapy, and maintenance therapy options (including PARP inhibitors) after completion of first-line chemotherapy.

Does uterine preservation affect survival outcomes of patients with stage I ovarian sex cord-stromal cell tumours? A multi-institutional study

OBJECTIVE

Sex cord-stromal tumours of the ovary are relatively uncommon neoplasms that account for 3 % of all ovarian cancers. Uterine preservation with careful staging is achievable; however, conservative surgery remains controversial. This study examined the prognostic effects of uterine preservation in patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study was undertaken between January 1986 and February 2019, and the clinicopathological data of 4897 women with malignant ovarian tumours were collected. Seventy-seven patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours were eligible for inclusion. The characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients were examined. To investigate the prognostic effects of uterine-preserving surgery, baseline imbalances between patients with and without uterine-preserving surgery were adjusted using an inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores composed of independent clinical variables.

RESULTS

The mean ages of patients in the uterine-preserving surgery and non-uterine-preserving surgery groups were 39.8 and 57.8 years, respectively. After inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustments, no significant differences in overall survival (p = 0.205) or recurrence-free survival (p=0.071) were observed between the uterine-preserving surgery and non-uterine-preserving surgery groups. Estimated 10-year overall survival rates were 98.7 % in the uterine-preserving surgery group and 95.9 % in the non-uterine-preserving surgery group, and 10-year recurrence-free survival rates were 87.2 % in the uterine-preserving surgery group and 78.2 % in the non-uterine-preserving surgery group. Uterine-preserving surgery did not significantly affect the site of tumour recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Uterine-preserving surgery may be a feasible surgical option for patients with stage I sex cord-stromal tumours. Further research is needed to guarantee prognostic accuracy and develop effective therapeutic approaches for sex cord-stromal tumours.

The French national network dedicated to rare gynecological cancers diagnosis and management could improve the quality of surgery in daily practice of granulosa cell tumors. A TMRG and GINECO group Study

OBJECTIVE

The French national rare gynecological tumor network has been established to improve the quality of care through offering expertise in double reading histological diagnosis, reviewing cases and guiding management of these tumors through specialized multidisciplinary tumor boards and online clinical guidelines (www.ovaire-rare.com). The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of the development and implementation of this network by assessing the conformity of medical practice with the guidelines concerning the granulosa cell tumors (GCTs).

METHODS

This is a French nationwide study, including 463 patients (out of the 639 identified patients) with a definitive diagnosis of GCT between 2011 and 2016. Surgical practices were analyzed for conformity with the current guidelines (www.ovaire-rare.org). Medical records, surgical and pathological reports were systematically analyzed. Total conformity was defined by a conservative (unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) or radical surgery (hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy) including surgical staging (omentectomy, peritoneal biopsies and peritoneal cytology) according to the FIGO stage. Partial conformity referred to a conservative or radical surgery without surgical staging and non-conformity was defined as a non-optimal surgery as recommended by the guidelines.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 49 years old (range 10-89). The median size of tumor was 94 mm (range 5-400). Radical surgery was performed in 240 patients (52%); while a fertility-sparing surgery was performed in 98 cases (21%). A surgical staging was performed in 76 cases (16%) and an evaluation of the endometrium in 289 cases (62%). Surgery was fully compliant with the guidelines in 65 patients (14%), partially compliant in 213 patients (46%), non-compliant in 137 patients (30%) and not assessable in 48 cases (10%). A statistically significant difference for compliance was observed in restaging surgery (p < 0,001), radical surgery (p = 0,017) and the period (before or after) of the implementation of the network (p < 0,001). Survival analyses did not allow us to demonstrate a significant difference in overall survival nor in PFS although there was a trend in favor of optimal surgery compared to incomplete/non optimal surgery.

CONCLUSION

Surgical management's conformity to the guidelines increases over time from 2011 to 2016. According to this study, the implementation of a national network dedicated to rare gynecologic tumors seems to significantly improve the surgical management of the patients with ovarian granulosa cell tumors.