Molecular classification defines outcomes and opportunities in young women with endometrial carcinoma

Papillary and ductal patterns of mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas are often overlooked: a retrospective revaluation of over 1000 endometrial carcinomas

AIMS

Mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma (MLA) of the endometrium is often a diagnostic challenge, due to its morphological resemblance to other more common Müllerian neoplasms. This study aimed to retrospectively identify overlooked MLA in a large endometrial carcinoma cohort, using a combination of immunohistochemistry (IHC), morphology and KRAS sequencing.

METHODS AND RESULTS

IHC was conducted on 1094 endometrial carcinomas, identifying 16 potential MLA cases based on GATA3+ and/or TTF1+ and ER- staining patterns, which subsequently underwent detailed histological review, KRAS sequencing and ProMisE molecular classification. Of the IHC screen-positive cases, one was positive for both GATA3 and TTF1, nine were positive for GATA3 only and six were positive for TTF1 only. All IHC screen-positive cases were POLE wild-type. All five tumours in the NSMP category showed morphological features of MLA, while the three MMRd and eight p53abn tumours did not show MLA morphology. The five cases diagnosed as MLA on review were all originally diagnosed as low-grade endometrioid adenocarcinoma probably because of rare morphological patterns, being predominantly papillary or ductal. Four of the five cases harboured a KRAS mutation.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the importance of a comprehensive diagnostic approach for accurately identifying endometrial MLA and for pathologists to be aware of papillary and ductal patterns in endometrial carcinoma assessment. Further exploration into the molecular landscape of MLA is essential for refining diagnostic criteria and developing targeted therapies.

Molecular subtyping of endometrial cancer via a simplified one-step NGS classifier, ARID1A and ZFHX4 mutations help further subclassify CNL/MSI-H patients

BACKGROUND

Molecular subtyping has changed the prognostic stratification and therapeutic guidance for patients with endometrial cancer (EC). However, simultaneous application of sanger sequencing and immunohistochemistry under ProMisE criteria may be time- and tissue-consuming. This study attempted to measure subtype-specific biomarkers by one-step next-generation sequencing (NGS) resulting in a shorter turnaround time and less requirement of tissue samples.

METHODS

FFPE samples from 233 EC patients were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) information was available for 131 patients with a median follow-up of 66 months. Genomic DNA was extracted and subjected to a one-step NGS panel including TP53, POLE and MSI measurement. Further comprehensive genomic analyses were performed on DNA from MSI-H and copy number low (CNL) subtypes.

RESULTS

The molecular typing ratio of the 233 patients was 8.15% for POLE subtype, 18.88% for MSI-H subtype, 11.59% for copy number high (CNH) subtype and 61.37% for CNL subtype. The 10-year OS and disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 100% in POLE subtype, while only 33.51% and 39.69% in CNH subtype. In patients with CNL and CNL/MSI-H subtypes, ARID1A and ZFHX4 mutations were significantly associated with worse prognosis respectively.

CONCLUSION

This simplified one-step NGS panel can effectively subgroup EC patients into four prognostically different subtypes. New biomarkers are able to potentially refine the classification of patients with CNL/MSI-H subtypes into groups with distinct clinical outcomes.

Low-Grade Endometrial Cancer with Abnormal p53 Expression as a Separate Clinical Entity: Insights from RNA Sequencing and Immunohistochemistry

Background: A molecular classification of endometrial cancer was developed based on an analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas. In this classification, the group characterized by abnormal p53 immunohistochemical expression showed the poorest prognosis. However, there may be no need to apply a molecular classification in low-grade endometrial cancer. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of abnormal p53 immunohistochemical expression in low-grade endometrial cancer. Methods: We obtained nine frozen samples of endometrial cancer [low-grade endometrial cancer with wild-type p53 expression (EClop53wt group): n = 3, low-grade endometrial cancer with abnormal p53 expression (EClop53ab group): n = 3, and high-grade endometrial cancer (EChi group): n = 3]. RNA sequencing was performed for each sample. All the samples passed RNA quality control. In addition, an immunohistochemical analysis was performed for 44 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. Results: Differentially expressed genes were identified in the RNA sequencing results (1811 genes between the EClop53ab group and the EChi group, and 1088 genes between the EClop53ab group and the EClop53wt group). In a principal component analysis, the EClop53ab group was more similar to the EClop53wt group than to the EChi group. In the immunohistochemical analysis, L1CAM expression was significantly less frequently observed in the EClop53ab group than in the EChi group. Moreover, p21 expression tended to be more frequently observed in the EClop53ab group than in the EChi group. Conclusions: In this study, the RNA sequencing and immunohistochemical results revealed that the EClop53ab group is a separate entity from the EChi group. While the abnormal p53 group is considered the most prognostically unfavorable in molecular classification, these findings suggest that routine molecular profiling is not necessary for patients with low-grade endometrial cancer. However, there is insufficient evidence to modify adjuvant treatment in low-grade endometrial cancer patients. Further investigation is needed on the clinical application of molecular classification to low-grade endometrial cancer.

Molecular classification of endometrial cancers (EC) and association with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) outcomes: Ancillary analysis of GOG-0258

PURPOSE

Determine if molecular classification using mismatch repair (MMR) and p53 protein expression predicts recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in endometrial cancer (EC) patients treated with chemotherapy and radiation (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT).

METHODS

GOG-0258, a phase III randomized trial (NCT00942357), compared CRT to CT. Immunohistochemistry assessed MMR and p53 status. Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox models analyzed survival outcomes by molecular subtype.

RESULTS

ECs classified as deficient MMR (dMMR) (27 %), p53 abnormal (p53abn) (24 %), and p53 wild type (p53wt) (49 %). p53abn were more frequent in patients that were older, Black, and had serous histology (p < 0.001). Median follow up was 113 months. Five-year RFS and OS were worse with p53abn (29 % [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 3.39 (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 2.34-4.91)] and 39 % [HR = 4.64 (95 % CI: 3.16-6.79)] compared to those with p53wt (referent) (p < 0.001). The five-year RFS and OS for dMMR cancers were (58 % [HR = 1.30 (95 % CI: 0.85-1.97)] and 77 % [HR = 1.53 (95 % CI: 0.99-2.36)] compared to those with p53wt (69 % and 85 %). After adjusting for age, gross residual disease, and treatment, p53wt improved RFS with CRT compared to CT in an exploratory analysis (77 % vs 60 %; HR = 0.54 (95 % CI: 0.32-0.94). The 5-year and 10-year OS rates were similar in CRT compared to CT in all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Molecular classification appears to be predictive and prognostic, with worse survival in those with p53abn tumors. In an exploratory analysis, p53wt appears to predict improved RFS, favoring CRT over CT. There was no difference in treatment efficacy based on molecular subtype for OS.

Not all uterine carcinosarcomas are created equal: Survival outcomes according to molecular characterization of uterine carcinosarcoma

OBJECTIVES

To assess if ProMisE classifier molecular subtypes are associated with differing survival outcomes in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and compare these outcomes to endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) tumors.

METHODS

There were 2235 UCS and 6469 EEC tumors using next-generation sequencing of DNA, whole exome sequencing, and RNA. Microsatellite instability (MSI) was tested by IHC and NGS. Real-world overall survival (OS) was obtained from Caris Life Sciences database and paired with insurance claims data. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model, and p-values were calculated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 2235 UCS samples, 2.7 % (n = 48) were POLE mutant (MT), 7.4 % (n = 132) MSI-H, 78.2 % (n = 1402), TP53 MT, and 11.7 % (n = 210), TP53 wild type (WT). In UCS POLE MT tumors, median OS (74.8 mos; 95 % CI: 30.5-not reached [NR]; p < 0.01) was significantly longer than all other subtypes. There was no difference in median post-chemo OS between POLE MT UCS and POLE MT EEC (p = 0.75) or MSI-H UCS and MSI-H EEC (p = 0.14). TP53 MT UCS and TP53 WT UCS tumors had worse median OS compared their respective ECC subtypes (27.9 vs 35.3 mos; HR: 1.3 95 % CI (1.1-1.5); p = 0.01, 29.4 vs 70.7 mos; HR: 2.0 95 % CI (1.5-2.7); p < 0.01). HER2 negative UCS had worse post-chemo OS compared to HER2 negative EEC (32.9 vs 77 mos; HR 1.60 95 % CI (1.092-2.348); p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

TP53 MT is the most common molecular UCS sub-type. Overall, UCS has tiered survival according to molecular classification, which mirrors EEC survival patterns. Despite UCS being considered a more aggressive histology, POLE MT and MSI-H outcomes when comparing UCS and EEC were not statistically different.

Meta-analysis of the ability of mutational profiles on the cancer genome atlas to predict prognosis in endometrial carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In 2013, The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network suggested that endometrial carcinoma patients may be reclassified into four molecular prognostic groups.

OBJECTIVE

To compare survival of endometrial carcinoma patients with different mutational profiles.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies reporting survival of endometrial carcinoma patients were identified through systematic searches of four databases.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included relevant studies based on the literature type, data integrity and the methodological quality.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The pooled survival data were compared among patients with different mutational profiles. Heterogeneity in the pooled data was assessed using the I2 statistic.

MAIN RESULTS

Data were meta-analyzed from nine studies involving 4755 patients, who were classified into the following mutational profiles: p53abn, 745 patients (15.6%); MMRd, 1454 patients (30.6%); POLEmut, 351 patients (7.4%); and p53wt, 2205 patients (46.4%). Compared to the p53wt group, the p53abn group showed significantly worse overall survival (OS) (HR 2.31, 95% CI: 1.67-3.19), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 2.86, 95% CI: 1.45-5.64) and disease-specific survival (HR 2.60, 95% CI: 1.41-4.79); and the MMRd group showed significantly worse OS (HR 1.30, 95% CI: 1.11-1.53) and PFS (HR 1.27, 95% CI: 1.01-1.59). The POLEmut group, in contrast, showed similar survival as the p53wt group.

CONCLUSIONS

The four mutational profiles for patients with endometrial carcinoma in the Cancer Genome Atlas for Endometrial Cancer are associated with worse to better survival in the trend: p53abn < MMRd < POLEmut ≈ p53wt. Mutational profiling may be useful for stratifying endometrial carcinoma patients by survival risk, which in turn may improve their management.

Meta-analysis of the clinicopathologic features of endometrial cancer molecular staging

Objective

The 2013 TCGA identified four molecular subgroups of endometrial cancer; however, the data results for most of the pathological features were varied and of low value for clinical application. Therefore, a meta-analysis of articles related to the clinicopathological features of molecular typing was performed to observe how the prevalence of the four subgroups varied across different pathological features and whether they were associated with certain specific pathological features and to understand how molecular typing may influence current pathological assessments.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP were searched from the time of library construction until May 2024, and the following data were extracted: histological type, FIGO grade, FIGO stage, LVSI, depth of muscularis propria infiltration, and lymph node status of each TCGA group. Two reviewers used the Cochrane Diagnostic Research Scale assessment, and the data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4.1 and Stata 14.0.

Results

Fourteen diagnostic research papers were included in this study, with a total of 4,776 patients with endometrial cancer. Non-estrogen-related endometrial carcinoma (NEEC) vs. estrogen-related endometrial carcinoma (EEC) was low in polymerase epsilon (POLE) (OR = 0.49), microsatellite instability (MSI) (OR = 0.45), and copy number low (CNL) (OR = 0.11), while it was high in CNH (OR = 26.76). G3 EEC vs. G1-2 EEC POLE (OR = 1.98), MSI (OR = 1.74), and CNH (OR = 5.57) were high, whereas it was low in CNL (OR = 0.23), low in FIGO II-IV vs. FIGO I in POLE (OR = 0.39) and CNH (OR = 0.64), and high in FIGO II-IV vs. FIGO I in CNH (OR = 3.05). There was no difference in MSI prevalence in FIGO II-IV vs. FIGO I. POLE (OR = 0.64) and CNL (OR = 0.75) were low in myometrial invasion depths ≥50% and lower in myometrial invasion depths <50%, and CNL (OR) was higher in CNH (OR) than in myometrial invasion depths <50%. There was no difference in MSI between different myometrial invasion depths. MSI (OR = 1.69) and CNH (OR = 2.12) were higher in lymphatic vascular infiltration (LVSI) vs. no LVSI; CNL (OR = 0.39) was lower in LVSI than in no LVSI. There was no difference in POLE in the presence or absence of LVSI. Lymph node metastasis with and without lymph node metastasis in POLE (OR = 0.25) and CNL (OR = 0.31) were lower, and CNH (OR = 3.06) was higher in lymph node metastasis than in no lymph node metastasis. There was no difference in MSI in the presence or absence of lymph node metastasis.

Conclusions

POLE patients predominated in pathological features of early-stage endometrial cancer and had better prognosis. MSI patients were more likely to be found in EEC and G3 EEC as well as LVSI. Nearly half of G3 EEC as well as LVSI were present in MSI patients, and CNH patients were more likely to be found to have pathological features of advanced endometrial cancer and poor prognosis, providing evidence that CNH is a high-risk cancer. Patients with CNL were more likely to be found to have pathological features of early-stage endometrial cancer and good prognosis, and CNL was present in large numbers in both early-stage and late-stage endometrial cancers. CNL does not yet have a precise prognostic value.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024563661.

Challenges in implementation of molecular classification in early stage endometrial cancer-An NRG Oncology cooperative group mixed-methods study

BACKGROUND

Professional guidelines recommend molecular profiling for mismatch repair (MMR), p53, and polymerase epsilon (POLE) status in endometrial cancer (EC). However, adoption in the United States has not been documented, and barriers to the implementation of testing have not been described.

METHODS

In this mixed-methods study, implementation science frameworks were used to develop a quantitative survey. Gynecologic oncologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and pathologists affiliated with NRG Oncology programs were contacted through snowball sampling and were surveyed during 2022-2023. A subset of respondents was interviewed. Statistical and thematic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

At least 403 NRG Oncology-affiliated providers were contacted for the survey, and 107 (26.6%) responded. Greater than 90% of respondents perceived POLE, MMR, and p53 status as important for clinical care. MMR and p53 tests were perceived as easy to obtain, but only 24.2% of respondents reported that POLE testing was moderately or very easy to obtain. Respondents from academic sites reported better access to molecular classification and perceived greater importance of molecular classification compared with respondents from community sites. In thematic analysis of 13 qualitative interviews, cost concerns were reported as large barriers to testing. Interviewees reported a desire for prospective data to guide treatment selection based on classification results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although integrating molecular classification into standard pathologic reporting is recommended, and clinicians perceive molecular profiling in early stage EC as important, survey respondents noted significant implementation barriers. Implementation challenges that differ between community oncology and academic practice settings were identified. Strategies to improve equitable access to molecular classification of early stage EC are needed.

Implementation of the ProMisE classifier and validation of its prognostic impact in Brazilian endometrial carcinomas

Purpose

Molecular classification of endometrial cancer (EC) has emerged as a key approach to individualize therapy and define prognostic outcomes. This study aimed to implement the traditional ProMisE classification in a Brazilian population, compared with a molecular setting of ProMisE biomarkers, and evaluate its impact on patients' prognosis.

Patient and methods

A prospective cohort of 114 patients with primary EC treated at Barretos Cancer Hospital (BCH) between October 2020 and December 2022 was conducted. Pathology diagnosis, staging, treatment, and follow-up data were collected. The traditional ProMisE methodology was carried out by POLE hotspot sequencing and immunohistochemistry (IHC) for p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. We further evaluate the MMR and TP53 status by molecular approach, namely microsatellite instability (MSI) by PCR-based and TP53 mutation analysis by next-generation sequencing (NGS). The results of the 4 molecular groups in both methodologies were compared regarding agreement accuracy and survival outcomes.

Results

Among the 114 cases, the traditional ProMisE groups were: POLEmut 15.8%, MMRd 28.1%, p53abn 27.2%, and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) 28.9%. Considering the molecular classification approach, we observed a POLEmut group of 15.8%, MSI group of 23.7%, TP53 mutation of 27.2%, and NSMP of 33.3%. The concordance rate of both approaches was 86.8% (99/114 cases) with an overall accuracy of 0.87. Importantly, both traditional and molecular ProMisE approaches were associated with significant distinct overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) outcomes, with POLEmut patients exhibiting a better prognosis (93.8% OS, at 24 months), whereas the p53abn having a worse survival time (68.9% of OS, at 24 months).

Conclusion

We reported for the first time the Brazilian profile of the ProMisE classification of endometrial cancer and demonstrated the prognostic impact of the traditional and molecular ProMisE classification on patient outcomes.

Uterine-Conserving Treatment Options for Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Early Endometrial Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to synthesize available literature on uterine-conserving treatment options for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma while highlighting remaining unanswered questions.

RECENT FINDINGS

The need for uterine-conserving treatment options for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma is growing with the increasing number of cases in younger patients or those who cannot undergo surgery. We reviewed the oncological and reproductive outcomes associated with endocrine therapies used for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and grade 1 endometrial carcinoma. The rising prevalence of delayed childbearing, obesity, and diabetes in reproductive-age individuals and of medical comorbidities associated with high surgical risk continues to amplify the demand for uterine-conserving therapies. Appropriate patient selection for such therapies is imperative to maximize likelihood of treatment response. The ideal candidates are patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia or early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer with no evidence of myometrial invasion or extrauterine disease. The most accepted conservative therapeutic approach is hormonal therapy with close surveillance, with or without eventual hysterectomy following childbearing or failure of treatment. Further prospective and randomized trials are needed to address optimal patient and treatment selection, as well as the use of molecular profiling for treatment individualization and prognostication.

Mismatch repair deficiency and abnormal p53 expression has significant predictive value for progesterone resistance and endometrial tumorigenesis in patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia receiving fertility-preserving treatment

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-d) and abnormal p53 expression (p53abn) in patients with endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) who underwent fertility-preserving treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 51 patients with EAH who underwent fertility-sparing treatment. Endometrial biopsy specimens obtained before hormone therapy were collected and used for immunohistochemical staining for MMR and p53 proteins. Response, relapse, and progression rates were assessed based on age, body mass index, diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, reproductive history, MMR status, and p53 status.

RESULTS

Overall, 11/51 (21.6%) patients had loss of MMR proteins and 6/51 (11.8%) had p53abn. Patients with MMR-d had lower complete response (CR) rates than those with normal staining patients at 12 months after initial treatment (p = 0.049). Patients with MMR-d had significantly higher relapse rates than those with MMR-p at the 1-year follow-ups after achieving CR (p = 0.035). Moreover, patients with MMR-d had a higher incidence of disease progression at 2, 3, and 4 years after fertility-sparing treatment (p = 0.001, p = 0.01 and p = 0.035, respectively). Patients with p53abn had higher relapse rates than those with p53wt at the 1- and 2-year follow-ups after achieving CR (p = 0.047 and p = 0.036, respectively). Moreover, patients with p53abn had a higher incidence of disease progression at 3 and 4 years after fertility-sparing treatment (p = 0.02 and p = 0.049, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

EAH patients with MMR-d and p53abn have a significantly higher risk of disease relapse and progression. Thus, MMR-d and p53abn may be used as predictive biomarkers of progestin resistance and endometrial tumorigenesis in EAH.

Metabolism pathway-based subtyping in endometrial cancer: An integrated study by multi-omics analysis and machine learning algorithms

Endometrial cancer (EC), the second most common malignancy in the female reproductive system, has garnered increasing attention for its genomic heterogeneity, but understanding of its metabolic characteristics is still poor. We explored metabolic dysfunctions in EC through a comprehensive multi-omics analysis (RNA-seq datasets from The Cancer Genome Atlas [TCGA], Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia [CCLE], and GEO datasets; the Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium [CPTAC] proteomics; CCLE metabolomics) to develop useful molecular targets for precision therapy. Unsupervised consensus clustering was performed to categorize EC patients into three metabolism-pathway-based subgroups (MPSs). These MPS subgroups had distinct clinical prognoses, transcriptomic and genomic alterations, immune microenvironment landscape, and unique patterns of chemotherapy sensitivity. Moreover, the MPS2 subgroup had a better response to immunotherapy. Finally, three machine learning algorithms (LASSO, random forest, and stepwise multivariate Cox regression) were used for developing a prognostic metagene signature based on metabolic molecules. Thus, a 13-hub gene-based classifier was constructed to predict patients' MPS subtypes, offering a more accessible and practical approach. This metabolism-based classification system can enhance prognostic predictions and guide clinical strategies for immunotherapy and metabolism-targeted therapy in EC.

Potential of molecular classification to guide fertility-sparing management among young patients with endometrial cancer

The traditional histological classification system for endometrial carcinoma falls short in addressing the disease's molecular heterogeneity, prompting the need for alternative stratification methods. Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) has emerged as a clinically efficient tool to categorize endometrial cancers according to mismatch repair deficiency, POLE exonuclease domain mutations, and p53 expression. However, the application of this classification to fertility-sparing treatments remains unexplored, and current guidelines lack specificity in how it should be used. In this review, we summarize the available literature and establish the framework for future investigations focused on molecular profiling-based risk assessment of endometrial cancer, with the goal of utilizing precision medicine to optimally counsel patients seeking fertility-sparing treatment. While the available evidence is limited and of low quality, it does provide insights and frames future perspectives for managing fertility-sparing approaches on the basis of molecular subtypes. Evidence suggests that mismatch repair-deficient tumors are likely to recur despite progestin therapy, emphasizing the need for alternative treatments, with targeted therapies being a new landscape that still needs to be explored. Tumors with POLE mutations exhibit a favorable prognosis, but the safety of hysteroscopic resection alone requires further investigation. p53 abnormal tumors have an unfavorable prognosis, raising questions about their suitability for fertility-sparing treatment. Lastly, the no specific molecular profile (or p53 wild-type) tumors, while having a relatively good prognosis, are heterogeneous and require more precise biomarkers to effectively guide therapy for those with poorer prognoses. Addressing these research gaps will lead to more precise guidelines to ensure optimal selection for fertility-sparing treatment.

Landscape of Endometrial Cancer: Molecular Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Target Therapy

Endometrial cancer is one the most prevalent gynecological cancers and, unfortunately, has a poor prognosis due to low response rates to traditional treatments. However, the progress in molecular biology and understanding the genetic mechanisms involved in tumor processes offers valuable information that has led to the current classification that describes four molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer. This review focuses on the molecular mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancers, such as genetic mutations, defects in the DNA mismatch repair pathway, epigenetic changes, or dysregulation in angiogenic or hormonal signaling pathways. The preclinical genomic and molecular investigations presented allowed for the identification of some molecules that could be used as biomarkers to diagnose, predict, and monitor the progression of endometrial cancer. Besides the therapies known in clinical practice, targeted therapy is described as a new cancer treatment that involves identifying specific molecular targets in tumor cells. By selectively inhibiting these targets, key signaling pathways involved in cancer progression can be disrupted while normal cells are protected. The connection between molecular biomarkers and targeted therapy is vital in the fight against cancer. Ongoing research and clinical trials are exploring the use of standard therapy agents in combination with other treatment strategies like immunotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy to improve outcomes and personalize treatment for patients with endometrial cancer. This approach has the potential to transform the management of cancer patients. In conclusion, enhancing molecular tools is essential for stratifying the risk and guiding surgery, adjuvant therapy, and cancer treatment for women with endometrial cancer. In addition, the information from this review may have an essential value in the personalized therapy approach for endometrial cancer to improve the patient's life.

Efficacy of fertility-sparing treatment with LNG-IUS is associated with different ProMisE subtypes of endometrial carcinoma or atypical endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether proactive molecular risk classifier for endometrial cancer (ProMisE) could be used to assess the prognosis of patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treated with levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 93 AEH or early-stage EC patients who received LNG-IUS to preserve fertility . By immunohistochemistry and gene sequencing, 4 subtypes of ProMisE were identified (p53 wild type [p53 wt], mismatch repair-deficient [MMRd], p53-abnormal, and POLE-mutated). The primary outcome was the time to complete response (CR) after LNG-IUS therapy. Secondary outcomes included the recurrence rate after CR and success rate of conception.

RESULTS

Among the 93 patients, 15 (16.1%) were classified as MMRd, 6 (6.5%) as POLE-mutated, 5 (5.4%) as p53-abnormal, and 67 (72.0%) as p53 wt. Comparison of serum cancer antigen 125, family history of tumor, and positive rates of programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 protein and Ki67 protein in 4 groups showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05). Patients with the p53-abnormal subtype had the lowest overall CR rate (40%) and the highest recurrence rate (2/2). Patients with POLE-mutated subtype had the best prognosis, and all 6 patients achieved CR. When patients achieved complete remission, assisted reproductive technology was more likely to help them conceive than natural conception (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with early-stage EC or AEH who are more likely to benefit from fertility-sparing treatment can be identified using ProMisE classifier. Patients with POLE-mutated are suitable for fertility-sparing treatment with LNG-IUS.

Special Considerations in Classification and Workup of Endometrial Carcinomas

CONTEXT.—

A variety of uncommon malignant endometrial tumors can be challenging to diagnose because of overlapping morphology with more common entities. In some cases, immunohistochemical stains and/or molecular testing allow for more definitive diagnosis or prognostication.

OBJECTIVE.—

To review classic morphologic features of uncommon endometrial tumors, pathologic features of these tumors and their mimics, and the evidence for use of immunohistochemistry and molecular testing in the diagnosis of these tumors.

DATA SOURCES.—

University of Michigan (Ann Arbor) cases and review of pertinent literature about each entity.

CONCLUSIONS.—

Although each of these uncommon endometrial tumors has morphologic mimics, key histologic features, immunohistochemical stains, and molecular testing allow for accurate classification.

Analysis of patients with endometrial carcinoma using the ProMise classifier: a pilot study from India

BACKGROUND

Molecular subtyping of endometrial carcinomas (EC) has been shown to classify tumors into prognostically relevant groups. Characterizing EC with a limited number of markers viz., POLE mutations, p53 mutations, and MMR status, can provide valuable information.

DESIGN

Paraffin sections of a cohort of 48 EC from a tertiary care center were characterized for the above-mentioned molecular markers and analyzed in the context of survival.

METHODS

Formalin fixed paraffin embedded tissues from 48 EC were characterized for POLE mutations by Sanger sequencing (exons 9-14), for MMR (MLH1, MH2, MSH6) using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and copy number (high/low) using p53 IHC. Mutational status was integrated along with the clinicopathological details and survival analysis performed.

RESULTS

Eleven (22.9%) patients were MMR deficient, 3 (6.3%) had POLE mutation, while 2 (4.1%) had both POLE and P53 mutations (regarded as multiple classifiers). Twelve (25%) patients were found to have P53 mutations, while the remaining 20 (41.7%) had no specific molecular profile (NSMP). Median follow-up duration was 43.5 (2-62) months with 8 recurrences and 9 deaths. Tumors with POLE mutation had the most favorable prognosis followed by the NSMP and the MMR mutated group while the P53 and multiple classifier groups had the worst prognosis in terms of OS (Log-rank p: 0.006) and PFS (Log-rank p: 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The integration of molecular-clinicopathologic data for endometrial cancer classification, through cost-effective, clinically applicable assays appears to be a highly objective tool that can be adopted even in resource-limited settings. It has the potential to cause a shift in the paradigm of EC pathology and management practice.

Recent Advances in Endometrial Cancer Prevention, Early Diagnosis and Treatment

Endometrial cancer is the sixth commonest cancer in women worldwide, with over 417,000 diagnoses in 2020. The disease incidence has increased by 132% over the last 30 years and is set to continue to rise in response to an ageing population and increasing global rates of obesity and diabetes. A greater understanding of the mechanisms driving endometrial carcinogenesis has led to the identification of potential strategies for primary disease prevention, although prospective evaluation of their efficacy within clinical trials is still awaited. The early diagnosis of endometrial cancer is associated with improved survival, but has historically relied on invasive endometrial sampling. New, minimally invasive tests using protein and DNA biomarkers and cytology have the potential to transform diagnostic pathways and to allow for the surveillance of high-risk populations. The molecular classification of endometrial cancers has been shown to not only have a prognostic impact, but also to have therapeutic value and is increasingly used to guide adjuvant treatment decisions. Advanced and recurrent disease management has also been revolutionised by increasing the use of debulking surgery and targeted treatments, particularly immunotherapy. This review summarises the recent advances in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer and seeks to identify areas for future research.

Clinicopathological characteristics of multiple-classifier endometrial cancers: a cohort study and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Endometrial cancers with more than one molecular feature-POLE mutations (POLEmut), mismatch repair protein deficiency (MMRd), p53 abnormality (p53abn)-are called 'multiple classifiers'.

OBJECTIVE

To describe our cohort of multiple classifiers and to report the results of a review on their incidence and the techniques used to identify them.

METHODS

Multiple classifiers identified at the European Institute of Oncology, Milan, between April 2019 and Decmber 2022, were included. Clinicopathological, molecular characteristics, and oncologic outcomes were summarized and compared between single and multiple classifiers sharing common features. Studies on molecular classification of endometrial cancer were searched in the PubMed Database to collect data on the incidence of multiple classifiers and the techniques used for classification.

RESULTS

Among 422 patients, 48 (11.4%) were multiple classifiers: 15 (3.6%) POLEmut-p53abn, 2 (0.5%) POLEmut-MMRd, 28 (6.6%) MMRd-p53abn, and 3 (0.7%) POLEmut-MMRd-p53abn. MMRd-p53abn and MMRd differed in histotype (non-endometrioid: 14.8% vs 2.0%, p=0.006), grade (high-grade: 55.6% vs 22.2%, p=0.001), and MMR proteins expression, whereas they differed from p53abn in histotype (non-endometrioid: 14.8% vs 50.0%, p=0.006). POLEmut-p53abn and POLEmut differed only in grade (high-grade: 66.7% vs 22.7%, p=0.008), while they differed from p53abn in age (56.1 vs 66.7 years, p=0.003), stage (advanced: 6.7% vs 53.4%, p=0.001), and histotype (non-endometrioid: 6.7% vs 50.0%, p=0.002). Two (7.1%) patients with MMRd-p53abn, 4 (4.0%) with MMRd, and 25 (34.3%) with p53abn had a recurrence. No recurrences were observed in POLEmut-p53abn and POLEmut. TP53 sequencing allowed the detection of additional 7 (18.9%) multiple classifiers with normal p53 immunostaining. The incidence of multiple classifiers ranged from 1.8% to 9.8% in 10 published studies including >100 patients. When only p53 immunohistochemistry was performed, the highest incidence was 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

The characteristics of POLEmut-p53abn resembled those of POLEmut, whereas MMRd-p53abn appeared to be intermediate between MMRd and p53abn. The high proportion of multiple classifiers may be related to the methods used for molecular classification, which included both p53 immunohistochemistry and TP53 sequencing.

Conservative treatment of endometrial cancer in women of reproductive age (Review)

Endometrial cancer is the fifth most common female cancer worldwide and the third leading female cancer in the Western world. The marked surge in endometrial cancer incidence is alarming. The aim of the present review is to focus on endometrial cancer affecting young women of reproductive age. Surgery, namely abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy, with or without salpingo-oophorectomy, and sentinel lymph node detection has become the standard surgical strategy for early stage endometrioid endometrial cancer. However, premenopausal women might want to preserve their fertility, especially if they are nulliparous or have not reached their desired number of children at the time of diagnosis. Conservative, uterus-sparing treatment, based on progestin products, may be an advantageous option for patients meeting the necessary criteria. Potential candidates have to be committed to following a rigorous protocol of treatment, investigations and follow-up. The evidence in favor of this approach, although limited, is encouraging and patients who have achieved a histologically documented disease complete remission could attempt to conceive spontaneously or with the immediate use of assisted reproductive technology techniques. The risk of partial or negative response to progestin treatment or cancer recurrence is well documented, thus patients have to be aware of the possible need for interruption of conservative treatment and hysterectomy.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma

Background

The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment.

Objectives

To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

Results

The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues.

Conclusions

These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario.

What is new?

A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.

Molecular subtype stratified outcomes according to adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVES

Recent data support the predictive implications of molecular subtype assignment in endometrial cancer (EC). Our objective was to retrospectively assess clinical outcomes according to adjuvant treatment received within EC molecular subtypes.

METHODS

Clinical outcomes (disease-specific and progression-free survival DSS/PFS) of EC patients from a single institution and population-based cohorts that had undergone molecular classification were assessed with respect to adjuvant therapy received and 2016 ESMO risk group.

RESULTS

2472 ECs were assessed; 184 (7.4%) POLEmut, 638 (25.8%) MMRd, 1223 (49.5%) NSMP and 427 (17.3%) p53abn. N = 774 (34.6%) of the cohort were ESMO 2016 high risk and 109 (4.8%) were advanced or metastatic. In patients with MMRd EC, assessed across and within stage, there was no observed benefit in DSS or PFS with the addition of chemotherapy +/- radiation compared to radiation alone in ESMO high risk (p = 0.694) or ESMO high, advanced, metastatic risk groups combined (p = 0.852). In patients with p53abn EC, adjuvant chemotherapy given with radiation was associated with significantly longer DSS compared to radiation alone in ESMO high risk (p = 0.007) and ESMO high, advanced and metastatic risk groups combined (p = 0.015), even when restricted to stage I disease (p < 0.001) and when compared in serous vs. non-serous histotypes (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with more favorable outcomes for patients with p53abn EC, including stage I disease and non-serous histotypes, but does not appear to add benefit within MMRd ECs for any stage of disease, consistent with PORTEC-3 molecular subanalysis. Prospective trials, assessing treatment efficacy within molecular subtype are needed, however these 'real-world' data should be considered when discussing adjuvant treatment with patients.

Utility of molecular subtypes and genetic alterations for evaluating clinical outcomes in 1029 patients with endometrial cancer

BACKGROUND

We investigated the utility of a molecular classifier tool and genetic alterations for predicting prognosis in Japanese patients with endometrial cancer.

METHODS

A total of 1029 patients with endometrial cancer from two independent cohorts were classified into four molecular subtype groups. The primary and secondary endpoints were relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively.

RESULTS

Among the 265 patients who underwent initial surgery, classified according to immunohistochemistry, patients with DNA polymerase epsilon exonuclease domain mutation had an excellent prognosis (RFS and OS), patients with no specific molecular profile (NSMP) and mismatch repair protein deficiency had an intermediate prognosis, and those with protein 53 abnormal expression (p53abn) had the worst prognosis (P < 0.001). In the NSMP group, mutant KRAS and wild-type ARID1A were associated with significantly poorer 5-year RFS (41.2%) than other genomic characteristics (P < 0.001). The distribution of the subtypes differed significantly between patients with recurrence/progression and classified by sequencing (n = 764) and patients who underwent initial surgery (P < 0.001). Among patients with recurrence/progression, 51.4% had the opportunity to receive molecular targeted therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

A molecular classifier is a useful tool for determining prognosis and eligibility for molecularly targeted therapy in patients with endometrial cancer.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Hum Reprod Open 2023;2023:hoac057. [PMID: 36756380 PMCID: PMC9900425 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac057]

STUDY QUESTION

How should fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma be performed?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Forty-eight recommendations were formulated on fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in endometrial carcinoma in a multidisciplinary setting. While addressing also work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility-sparing treatment.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practising clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgement was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations in four sections; patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

Of the 48 recommendations, none could be based on level I evidence and only 16 could be based on level II evidence, implicating that 66% of the recommendations are supported only by observational data, professional experience and consensus of the development group.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. G.S. has reported grants from MSD Italia S.r.l., advisory boards for Storz, Bayer, Astrazeneca, Metronic, TESARO Bio Italy S.r.l and Johnson & Johnson, and honoraria for lectures from Clovis Oncology Italy S.r.l. M.G. has reported advisory boards for Gedeon Richter and Merck. The other authors have reported no conflicts of interest.

DISCLAIMER

This document represents the views of ESHRE, ESGO and ESGE which are the result of consensus between the relevant stakeholders and where relevant based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. The recommendations should be used for informational and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care, or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma

The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma, consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive information on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in endometrial carcinoma in a multidisciplinary setting. While addressing also work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility-sparing treatment.A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), and the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE), aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment (patient selection, tumor clinicopathological characteristics, treatment, special issues) in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of endometrial carcinoma (11 experts from across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified by a systematic search, was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE Guidelines for the fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma

Background

The standard surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC) consisting of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy drastically affects the quality of life of patients and creates a challenge for clinicians. Recent evidence-based guidelines of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in EC in a multidisciplinary setting. While also addressing work-up for fertility preservation treatments and the management and follow-up for fertility preservation, it was considered relevant to further extend the guidance on fertility sparing treatment.

Objectives

To define recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Materials and Methods

ESGO/ESHRE/ESGE nominated an international multidisciplinary development group consisting of practicing clinicians and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of EC (11 experts across Europe). To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature published since 2016, identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the development group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 95 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives.

Results

The multidisciplinary development group formulated 48 recommendations for fertility-sparing treatment of patients with endometrial carcinoma in four sections: patient selection, tumour clinicopathological characteristics, treatment and special issues.

Conclusions

These recommendations provide guidance to professionals caring for women with endometrial carcinoma, including but not limited to professionals in the field of gynaecological oncology, onco-fertility, reproductive surgery, endoscopy, conservative surgery, and histopathology, and will help towards a holistic and multidisciplinary approach for this challenging clinical scenario. What is new? A collaboration was set up between the ESGO, ESHRE and ESGE, aiming to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based guidelines focusing on key aspects of fertility-sparing treatment in order to improve the quality of care for women with endometrial carcinoma across Europe and worldwide.

Molecular Profiling of Endometrial Cancer From TCGA to Clinical Practice

Molecular classification provides an objective, reproducible framework for categorization of endometrial cancers (ECs), informing prognosis and selection of therapy. Currently, the uptake of molecular classification, integration in to EC management algorithms, and enrollment in molecular subtype-specific clinical trials lags behind what it could be. Access to molecular testing is not uniform, and subsequent management (surgical, adjuvant therapy) is unacceptably variable. We are in the midst of a critical landscape change in this disease site, with increasing emphasis on the integration of molecular features in EC care that can potentially improve standard of care globally. This article summarizes the rationale for molecular classification of ECs, strategies for implementation in low and high resource settings, and actionable opportunities based on this information.

Oncological and reproductive outcomes for gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with aromatase inhibitors or levonorgestrel-releasing intra-uterine system in women with endometrial cancer or atypical endometrial hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) combined with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device (LNG-IUD) or aromatase inhibitor (letrozole) in women with endometrial carcinoma or atypical endometrial hyperplasia who wished to preserve fertility.

METHODS

Patients at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 2013 and December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 179 patients who were unsuitable to undergo treatment with high-dose oral progestin, including those with progestin allergies, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, liver and/or renal dysfunction, hypercoagulable state, and thrombosis were included. Patient data were retrieved from medical records and a prospectively maintained database that represented the standard protocol was followed for all patients. Clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and reproductive outcomes were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression models were constructed to determine the associations between complete remission, recurrence, and fertility.

RESULTS

Overall, 169 patients (94.4%) achieved complete remission; 58 (96.7%) had atypical endometrial hyperplasia and 111 (93.3%) had endometrial carcinoma. The complete remission rates for the GnRHa plus LNG-IUD and GnRHa plus letrozole groups were 93.5% and 95.8%, respectively. The median time to complete remission was 6 (range 3-18) months: 4 (range 3-10) months for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and 8 (range 3-18) months for endometrial carcinoma. After a median follow-up of 27.5 (range 3-92) months, 41 (24.3%) women developed recurrence, with a median recurrence time of 17 (range 6-77) months. Of the patients with complete remission, 134 patients desired to conceive and 42 (32.3%) became pregnant, 24 (17.9%) were successfully delivered, 5 (3.7%) were still pregnant, while 13 miscarried.

CONCLUSION

GnRHa combined treatment provides favorable oncological and reproductive outcomes. Larger multi-institutional studies are required to confirm these preliminary findings.

CRABP2 - A novel biomarker for high-risk endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the clinical and functional implications of elevated CRABP2 expression in endometrial cancer (EC) patients.

METHODS

Patients were stratified into high and low CRABP2 expression groups using a decision tree classifier. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses determined the prognostic and clinicopathological consequences of increased CRABP2 expression. A CRABP2 gene signature was generated using differential expression analysis, and analyzed using network-based approaches. The findings were validated in The Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC), a newly generated cohort of 120 endometrial tissues, and The Cancer Dependency Map (DepMap).

RESULTS

60 (11%) patients in TCGA had high CRABP2 expression, whilst 468 (89%) had low expression. High expression was associated with serous EC, reduced overall survival, advanced stage and grade. Downstream retinoic acid receptors (RARG and RARA) were correlated with CRABP2 expression and were associated with worse prognosis in serous EC. The CRABP2 gene signature was enriched for Polycomb target gene sets, and was regulated by ELP3 and BMP7. BMP7 expression was increased in the CRABP2-high group, was associated with worse prognosis, and CRISPR-Cas9 screens revealed correlations in its cell-fitness score with CRABP2 following gene knockout. The opposite was true for ELP3, suggesting opposing effects from both master regulators.

CONCLUSIONS

CRABP2 expression is associated with poor prognosis and advanced EC. The expression of RARA and RARG correlates with CRABP2 and are associated with worse prognosis in advanced histological subtypes. Polycomb target gene sets and two master regulators, ELP3 and BMP7, were identified as functionally relevant mechanisms driving aberrant CRABP2 expression.

Endometrial Cancer Following Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System Insertion in Young Women with Atypical Hyperplasia: Two Case Reports and Literature Review

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) insertion is the first-line treatment for atypical hyperplasia (AH) in young women who wish to retain their fertility. However, the procedure is not always effective, and may allow AH to progress to endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). Two young women with AH who wished to preserve their fertility developed EEC following 52-mg LNG-IUS in insertion at our institution. One was a 34-year-old woman diagnosed with endometrial cancer 2 years after LNG-IUS insertion. The second was a 30-year-old woman diagnosed 17 months after LNG-IUS insertion. Proactive molecular risk classification for endometrial cancer (ProMisE) classification revealed that the first and second patients had p53-abnormal (p53abn) EEC and mismatch repair deficient (MMR-d) EEC, respectively. MMR-d and p 53abn were frequently observed in both AH and EEC specimens. Studies suggest that MMR-d and p53abn are predictors of the occurrence adverse effects after fertility-preserving treatment for EEC. AH is a precursor of EEC. Therefore, p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) mutation may be used to identify women with AH who will not likely benefit from progestin therapy. Molecular assays in women with AH will likely be useful for identifying novel predictive biomarkers of progestin resistance and to improve the safety of conservative treatment. Combined assessment of progesterone receptor (PR) with these predictive molecular markers may improve the predictive ability.

Less is more in endometrial cancer (SLN, conservative treatment, radical hysterectomy, molecular classification)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of endometrial cancer has known many evolutions within the last decades. In this review, we aim to summarize recent evolutions (mainly toward less aggressive management) that have occurred in the management of endometrial cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Enhanced by molecular classification, the determination of lymph node status, in young women, in case of cervical invasion, the treatment is evolving toward a less aggressive strategy.

SUMMARY

The predictive value and the safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy explain why most societies propose to abandon systematic pelvic and para aortic lymphadenectomy. For young women, the safety of fertility preservation is now well established and efficient protocols have been validated. In stage II endometrial cancer (stromal cervical invasion), radical hysterectomy appears excessive. The Cancer Genome Atlas classification increases prognostic evaluation in association with the traditional pathological classification and permits to tailor adjuvant treatment more accurately.

Molecular Classification in Patients With Endometrial Cancer After Fertility-Preserving Treatment: Application of ProMisE Classifier and Combination of Prognostic Evidence

The Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) is a molecular classification system that identifies endometrial cancer (EC) into four prognostically distinct subtypes: POLE-mutated, mismatch repair deficiency (MMR-D), p53 wild-type (p53wt), and p53 abnormal (p53abn). However, few reports have applied the ProMisE classifier to EC patients who underwent fertility-preserving treatment (FPT) so far. This study evaluated whether the ProMisE classifier predicted in early-stage EC patients after FPT. We first summarized the three reported outcomes of ProMisE applied to EC patients who received FPT. The hormone-treated patients with EC from 2010 to 2020 in our facility were then analyzed. By sequential immunohistochemistry and Sanger sequencing of POLE according to the ProMisE system, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks of patients before treatment were collected and classified into POLE-mutated, MMR-D, p53wt, and p53abn subtypes. The primary outcome was a complete response rate after FPT. Thirteen patients were enrolled from our facility, with 3 (3/13) MMR-D, 0 (0/13) POLE, 8 (8/13) p53wt, 1 (1/13) p53abn, and 1 (1/13) failed with DNA amplification. Six (6/8) patients with p53wt, 2 (2/3) patients with MMR-D, and 1 (1/1) patient with p53abn achieved a complete response in 6 months after treatment. The results of our study and the reported outcomes were finally combined. A total of 106 patients who underwent FPT were included. Of these, 23 (21.7%) were classified as MMR-D, 3 (2.8%) as POLE-mutated, 3 (2.8%) as p53abn, and 77 (72.6%) as p53wt. There was no significant difference in the complete response rate (P = 0.152) and recurrence rate (P = 0.174) between MMR-D and p53wt subtypes after FPT. Based on current data, we observed no prognostic significance of the ProMisE classifier in EC patients who underwent FPT. Larger prospective studies are needed to elucidate the precise prognostic meaning of this molecular classifier in these cases.

Synonymous Variants: Necessary Nuance in our Understanding of Cancer Drivers and Treatment Outcomes

Once called "silent mutations" and assumed to have no effect on protein structure and function, synonymous variants are now recognized to be drivers for some cancers. There have been significant advances in our understanding of the numerous mechanisms by which synonymous single nucleotide variants (sSNVs) can affect protein structure and function by affecting pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA expression, stability, folding, miRNA binding, translation kinetics, and co-translational folding. This review highlights the need for considering sSNVs in cancer biology to gain a better understanding of the genetic determinants of human cancers and to improve their diagnosis and treatment. We surveyed the literature for reports of sSNVs in cancer and found numerous studies on the consequences of sSNVs on gene function with supporting in vitro evidence. We also found reports of sSNVs that have statistically significant associations with specific cancer types but for which in vitro studies are lacking to support the reported associations. Additionally, we found reports of germline and somatic sSNVs that were observed in numerous clinical studies and for which in silico analysis predicts possible effects on gene function. We provide a review of these investigations and discuss necessary future studies to elucidate the mechanisms by which sSNVs disrupt protein function and are play a role in tumorigeneses, cancer progression, and treatment efficacy. As splicing dysregulation is one of the most well recognized mechanisms by which sSNVs impact protein function, we also include our own in silico analysis for predicting which sSNVs may disrupt pre-mRNA splicing.

Endometrial Cancer Management in Young Women

Endometrial cancer (EC) rarely develops in young women. Most cases are associated with known risk factors: BMI > 30, history of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOs), and race differentiation. The molecular EC classification based on The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network divides these heterogeneous cancers into four types: Polymerase Epsilon Mutation (POLE), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), Copy Number Low (CNL), and Copy Number High (CNH). This division was introduced to allow for early assessment of neoplastic changes and clinical management, including targeted therapies. The basic technique for imaging endometrium changes is transvaginal sonography. Hysteroscopy is the standard for obtaining endometrial material for histological evaluation. The MRI result permits assessment of the extent of EC cancer infiltration. In young women who want to preserve fertility, apart from surgery, conservative management is often implemented after strict selection based on clinical and pathological data. This pharmacological treatment involves the administration of progestogens MPA (medroxyprogesterone acetate) and MA (megestrol acetate). The use of metformin may increase the effectiveness of such treatment. An alternative option is to apply progestogens locally—via the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device. In addition to pharmacological treatment, hysteroscopic resection may be used—part of the uterine muscle adjacent to the pathologically changed endometrium may also undergo resection. An alternative is the administration of estrogen receptor modulators (e.g., SERMs) or aromatase inhibitors, or GnRH agonists.

Endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynaecological cancer in high income countries and its incidence is rising globally. Although an ageing population and fewer benign hysterectomies have contributed to this trend, the growing prevalence of obesity is the major underlying cause. Obesity poses challenges for diagnosis and treatment and more research is needed to offer primary prevention to high-risk women and to optimise endometrial cancer survivorship. Early presentation with postmenopausal bleeding ensures most endometrial cancers are cured by hysterectomy but those with advanced disease have a poor prognosis. Minimally invasive surgical staging and sentinel-lymph-node biopsy provides a low morbidity alternative to historical surgical management without compromising oncological outcomes. Adjuvant radiotherapy reduces loco-regional recurrence in intermediate-risk and high-risk cases. Advances in our understanding of the molecular biology of endometrial cancer have paved the way for targeted chemotherapeutic strategies, and clinical trials will establish their benefit in adjuvant, advanced, and recurrent disease settings in the coming years.

Fertility-Sparing Approaches in Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia and Endometrial Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Directions

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the fourth most common cancer in women in developed countries. Although it is usually diagnosed in postmenopausal women, its incidence has increased in young women, as well in recent decades, with an estimated rate of 4% in those under 40 years of age. Factors involved in this increase, particularly in resource-rich countries, include delayed childbearing and the rise in obesity. The new molecular classification of EC should help to personalize treatment, through appropriate candidate selection. With the currently available evidence, the use of oral progestin either alone or in combination with other drugs such as metformin, levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine devices and hysteroscopic resection, seems to be feasible and safe in women with early-stage EC limited to the endometrium. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence of the efficacy and safety of conservative management in EC. Randomized clinical trials in younger women and obese patients are currently underway.

Fertility-Sparing Treatment for Endometrial Cancer or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Patients With Obesity

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of fertility-sparing treatment on endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) patients with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2.

Methods

A total of 102 EC or AEH patients with obesity who received fertility-preserving therapy in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital were included in our study. All patients were followed up regularly. Clinical characteristics, treatment outcomes, adverse events, and reproductive outcomes were collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 88 (86.3%) patients achieved complete response (CR), 92.5% in AEH and 82.3% in EC, with 6 months (3–12 months) median CR time. High remission rates were found in patients who received gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa)-based regimen, were younger than 35 years old, and lost more than 10% of their weight. Fifteen (17.0%) women had developed recurrence with a median recurrence time of 26 (8–52) months. Patients who received GnRHa regimen, lost more than 10% weight, received maintenance therapy, or conceived during the follow-up period had a low probability of recurrence. Of the patients with CR, 57 women attempted to get pregnant and 16 (28.1%) patients became pregnant, 7 (12.3%) of them successfully delivered and 4 (7.0%) were in pregnancy, while 5 (8.8%) of them miscarried.

Conclusion

For obese patients with EC and AEH, fertility-preserving treatment can still achieve a promising response. Weight loss of more than 10% has a positive influence on response, recurrence, as well as pregnancy rates. GnRHa could be an option for obese women due to less effect on weight gain compared to progestin therapy.

Prognosis Stratification Tools in Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: Could We Improve Their Accuracy?

There are three prognostic stratification tools used for endometrial cancer: ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO 2016, ProMisE, and ESGO-ESTRO-ESP 2020. However, these methods are not sufficiently accurate to address prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the integration of molecular classification and other biomarkers could be used to improve the prognosis stratification in early-stage endometrial cancer. Relapse-free and overall survival of each classifier were analyzed, and the c-index was employed to assess accuracy. Other biomarkers were explored to improve the precision of risk classifiers. We analyzed 293 patients. A comparison between the three classifiers showed an improved accuracy in ESGO-ESTRO-ESP 2020 when RFS was evaluated (c-index = 0.78), although we did not find broad differences between intermediate prognostic groups. Prognosis of these patients was better stratified with the incorporation of CTNNB1 status to the 2020 classifier (c-index 0.81), with statistically significant and clinically relevant differences in 5-year RFS: 93.9% for low risk, 79.1% for intermediate merged group/CTNNB1 wild type, and 42.7% for high risk (including patients with CTNNB1 mutation). The incorporation of molecular classification in risk stratification resulted in better discriminatory capability, which could be improved even further with the addition of CTNNB1 mutational evaluation.

Prognostic significance of CTNNB1 mutation in early stage endometrial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In the last years, mutations in the exon 3 of CTNNB1 have emerged as a possible prognostic factor for recurrence in early stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, especially in cases with no specific molecular profile (NSMP).

Objective

To define the prognostic value of CTNNB1 mutations in early stage endometrioid endometrial carcinoma, through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched from their inception to November 2020 for all studies assessing the prognostic value of CTNNB1 mutation in early stage (FIGO I–II) endometrioid endometrial carcinoma. Odds ratio (OR) for tumor recurrence and hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated with a significant p value < 0.05.

Results

Seven studies with 1031 patients were included. Four studies were suitable for meta-analysis of OR and showed significant association between CTNNB1 mutation and the absolute number of recurrence (OR = 3.000; p = 0.019); the association became stronger after excluding patients with known molecular status other than NSMP (HR = 5.953; p = 0.012). Three studies were suitable for meta-analysis of HR and showed no significant association between CTNNB1 mutation and decreased DFS (HR = 1.847; p = 0.303); the association became significant after excluding patients with known molecular status other than NSMP (HR = 2.831; p = 0.026).

Conclusion

CTNNB1 mutation is significantly associated with recurrence in early stage endometrioid endometrial carcinomas, especially in the NSMP, appearing potentially useful in directing adjuvant treatment.

Clinicopathologic and protein markers distinguishing the “polymerase epsilon exonuclease” from the “copy number low” subtype of endometrial cancer

Objective

The need to perform genetic sequencing to diagnose the polymerase epsilon exonuclease (POLE) subtype of endometrial cancer (EC) hinders the adoption of molecular classification. We investigated clinicopathologic and protein markers that distinguish the POLE from the copy number (CN)-low subtype in EC.

Methods

Ninety-one samples (15 POLE, 76 CN-low) were selected from The Cancer Genome Atlas EC dataset. Clinicopathologic and normalized reverse phase protein array expression data were analyzed for associations with the subtypes. A logistic model including selected markers was constructed by stepwise selection using area under the curve (AUC) from 5-fold cross-validation (CV). The selected markers were validated using immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a separate cohort.

Results

Body mass index (BMI) and tumor grade were significantly associated with the POLE subtype. With BMI and tumor grade as covariates, 5 proteins were associated with the EC subtypes. The stepwise selection method identified BMI, cyclin B1, caspase 8, and X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1) as markers distinguishing the POLE from the CN-low subtype. The mean of CV AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and balanced accuracy of the selected model were 0.97, 0.91, 0.87, and 0.89, respectively. IHC validation showed that cyclin B1 expression was significantly higher in the POLE than in the CN-low subtype and receiver operating characteristic curve of cyclin B1 expression in IHC revealed AUC of 0.683.

Conclusion

BMI and expression of cyclin B1, caspase 8, and XBP1 are candidate markers distinguishing the POLE from the CN-low subtype. Cyclin B1 IHC may replace POLE sequencing in molecular classification of EC.

Body mass index and cyclin B1, caspase 8, and X-box binding protein 1 are candidate markers distinguishing between the polymerase epsilon exonuclease (POLE) and copy number (CN)-low subtypes of endometrial cancer. Cyclin B1 immunohistochemistry expression was significantly higher in the POLE than in the CN-low subtype and may substitute POLE sequencing.

Fertility Sparing Treatments in Endometrial Cancer Patients: The Potential Role of the New Molecular Classification

Endometrial cancer is the most frequent gynecological malignancy, and, although epidemiologically it mainly affects advanced age women, it can also affect young patients who want children and who have not yet completed their procreative project. Fertility sparing treatments are the subject of many studies and research in continuous evolution, and represent a light of hope for young cancer patients who find themselves having to face an oncological path before fulfilling their desire for motherhood. The advances in molecular biology and the more precise clinical and prognostic classification of endometrial cancer based on the 2013 The Cancer Genome Atlas classification allow for the selection of patients who can be submitted to fertility sparing treatments with increasing oncological safety. It would also be possible to predict the response to hormonal treatment by investigating the state of the genes of the mismatch repair.

Management of Recurrent Endometrial Cancer or Atypical Endometrial Hyperplasia Patients After Primary Fertility-Sparing Therapy

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and prognosis of fertility-sparing re-treatment on patients with recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) who wish to preserve their uterus after complete remission (CR) for primary conservative therapy.

Methods

We performed a retrospective study on recurrent EC or AEH patients who received fertility-sparing re-treatment after achieving CR. Data regarding clinicopathological factors, adverse events, treatment efficacy, tumor prognosis, and reproductive outcome were analyzed.

Results

Of the 98 recurrent patients with a median disease-free interval period of 19 (3–96) months, 18 patients decided to receive hysterectomy directly, and 80 patients received fertility-preserving re-treatment. Seventy-one (88.6%) cases achieved CR, 96.0% in AEH and 75.8% in EC patients, with the 6 (3–16) months’ median CR time. Seven (8.8%) patients failed to achieve CR and then underwent the hysterectomy: one partial response (PR), four stable disease (SD), and two progressive disease (PD). Forty-nine women attempted to get pregnant after CR, 13 (26.5%) became pregnant, seven (14.3%) successfully delivered, and six (12.2%) miscarried. During the follow-up period, 22 (31.0%) women had developed a second relapse with the median recurrence time of 12 (4–90) months, and 10 patients decided to receive the third round of fertility-sparing treatment. Seven (70.0%) patients, 33.3% in EC and 85.7% in AEH, achieved CR again. Hysterectomy was performed in two (20.0%) patients due to SD. After the third-round treatment, six women had the desire to conceive but no one became pregnant successfully.

Conclusion

For patients with recurrent EC and AEH after primary conservative treatment, fertility-preserving re-treatment can still achieve a promising response, and patients have possibilities of completing childbirth.

Prognostic value of the TCGA molecular classification in uterine carcinosarcoma

Background

The TCGA molecular groups of endometrial carcinoma are “POLE‐mutated” (POLEmut), “microsatellite‐instable/mismatch repair‐deficient” (MSI/MMRd), “TP53‐mutated/p53‐abnormal” (TP53mut/p53abn), and “no specific molecular profile” (NSMP).

Objective

Prognostic assessment of the TCGA groups in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS).

Search strategy

Systematic review from January 2000 to January 2021.

Selection criteria

Studies assessing the TCGA groups in UCS.

Data collection and analysis

Progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan–Meier and Cox analyses (reference: TP53mut/p53abn group) and compared with endometrioid and serous carcinomas (original TCGA cohort), with a significant P < 0.050.

Main results

Five studies with 263 UCS were included. Compared with TP53mut/p53abn UCS, MSI/MMRd UCS showed significantly better PFS (P < 0.001) but similar OS (P = 0.788), whereas NSMP UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.936) and OS (P = 0.240). Compared with their endometrioid/serous counterparts, NSMP and TP53mut/p53abn UCS showed significantly worse PFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004) and OS (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001), while MSI/MMRd UCS showed similar PFS (P = 0.595) but significantly worse OS (P < 0.001). The POLEmut group showed neither recurrences nor deaths in both the UCS and the endometrioid/serous carcinoma cohorts.

Conclusion

POLEmut UCS show excellent prognosis, whereas TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than that of TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas. The prognosis of MSI/MMRd UCS remains to be defined.

POLEmut UCS show the same excellent prognosis as POLEmut endometrioid carcinomas, while TP53mut/p53abn and NSMP UCS show a prognosis even worse than TP53mut/p53abn endometrioid/serous carcinomas.

A 4-Gene Signature Associated With Recurrence in Low- and Intermediate-Risk Endometrial Cancer

Background

The molecular profile of endometrial cancer has become an important tool in determining patient prognosis and their optimal adjuvant treatment. In addition to The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), simpler tools have been developed, such as the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE). We attempted to determine a genetic signature to build a recurrence risk score in patients diagnosed with low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer.

Methods

A case-control study was conducted. The eligible patients were women diagnosed with recurrence low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer between January 2009 and December 2014 at a single institution; the recurrence patients were matched to two nonrecurrence patients with the same diagnosis by age and surgical staging. Following RNA isolation of 51 cases, 17 recurrence and 34 nonrecurrence patients, the expression profile was determined using the nCounter^® PanCancer Pathways Panel, which contains 770 genes.

Results

The expression profile was successfully characterized in 49/51 (96.1%) cases. We identified 12 genes differentially expressed between the recurrence and nonrecurrence groups. The ROC curve for each gene was generated, and all had AUCs higher than 0.7. After backward stepwise logistic regression, four genes were highlighted: FN1, DUSP4, LEF1, and SMAD9. The recurrence risk score was calculated, leading to a ROC curve of the 4-gene model with an AUC of 0.93, sensitivity of 100%, and specificity of 72.7%.

Conclusion

We identified a four-gene signature that may be associated with recurrence in patients with low- and intermediate-risk endometrial cancer. This finding suggests a new prognostic factor in this poorly explored group of patients with endometrial cancer.

MSI testing : What's new? What should be considered?

Based on new trial data regarding immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the detection of high-grade microsatellite instability (MSI-H) or underlying deficient mismatch repair protein (dMMR) is now becoming increasingly important for predicting treatment response. For the first time, a PD‑1 ICI (pembrolizumab) has been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for first-line treatment of advanced (stage IV) dMMR/MSI‑H colorectal cancer (CRC). Further indications, such as dMMR/MSI‑H endometrial carcinoma (EC), have already succeeded (Dostarlimab, 2nd line treatment) and others are expected to follow before the end of 2021. The question of optimal testing in routine diagnostics should therefore be re-evaluated. Based on a consideration of the strengths and weaknesses of the widely available methods (immunohistochemistry and PCR), a test algorithm is proposed that allows quality assured, reliable, and cost-effective dMMR/MSI‑H testing. For CRC and EC, testing is therefore already possible at the primary diagnosis stage, in line with international recommendations (NICE, NCCN). The clinician is therefore enabled from the outset to consider not only the predictive but also the prognostic and predispositional implications of such a test when counseling patients and formulating treatment recommendations. As a basis for quality assurance, participation in interlaboratory comparisons and continuous documentation of results (e.g., QuIP Monitor) are strongly recommended.

Endometrial Cancer Molecular Characterization: The Key to Identifying High-Risk Patients and Defining Guidelines for Clinical Decision-Making?

Endometrial carcinomas (EC) are the sixth most common cancer in women worldwide and the most prevalent in the developed world. ECs have been historically sub-classified in two major groups, type I and type II, based primarily on histopathological characteristics. Notwithstanding the usefulness of such classification in the clinics, until now it failed to adequately stratify patients preoperatively into low- or high-risk groups. Pieces of evidence point to the fact that molecular features could also serve as a base for better patients' risk stratification and treatment decision-making. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), back in 2013, redefined EC into four main molecular subgroups. Despite the high hopes that welcomed the possibility to incorporate molecular features into practice, currently they have not been systematically applied in the clinics. Here, we outline how the emerging molecular patterns can be used as prognostic factors together with tumor histopathology and grade, and how they can help to identify high-risk EC subpopulations for better risk stratification and treatment strategy improvement. Considering the importance of the use of preclinical models in translational research, we also discuss how the new patient-derived models can help in identifying novel potential targets and help in treatment decisions.

Clear cell endometrial carcinomas with mismatch repair deficiency have a favorable prognosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

In the ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for endometrial carcinoma management, the risk category of clear cell carcinoma (CCC) is not well defined. In fact, while p53-abnormal (p53abn) CCC are known to be aggressive, the prognosis of mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd) and p53-wild-type (p53wt) CCCs is less clear.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the prognostic value of the MMRd and p53wt groups in CCC through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched from their inception to February 2021. All studies reporting p53 expression, MMR proteins expression and survival outcomes in endometrial CCC (either pure or mixed) were included. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analyses with hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) were performed by using the p53abn group as reference; a significant p-value<0.05 was adopted.

RESULTS

Six studies with 136 CCC (114 pure and 22 mixed) were included. Five-year OS was 95.7 ± 4.3% in the MMRd group, 48.4 ± 8.4% months in the p53wt group and 40.6 ± 10.4% in the p53abn group. The hazard of death was significantly lower in the MMRd group than in the p53abn group (HR = 0.062; p = 0.007), while it did not significantly differ between the p53wt and the p53abn group (HR = 0.673; p = 0.222). The POLEmut group could not be analyzed due to the absence of deaths. Similar results were observed in the pure CCC and mixed CCC subgroups.

CONCLUSION

MMRd CCCs seem to have a favorable prognosis and might be lumped together with MMRd endometrioid carcinoma for management purpose. On the other hand, p53wt CCCs appear prognostically more similar to p53abn CCCs.