Untargeted metabolomics as an unbiased approach to the diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism of the non-oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway

An evaluation of untargeted metabolomics methods to characterize inborn errors of metabolism

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) encompass a diverse group of disorders that can be difficult to classify due to heterogenous clinical, molecular, and biochemical manifestations. Untargeted metabolomics platforms have become a popular approach to analyze IEM patient samples because of their ability to detect many metabolites at once, accelerating discovery of novel biomarkers, and metabolic mechanisms of disease. However, there are concerns about the reproducibility of untargeted metabolomics research due to the absence of uniform reporting practices, data analyses, and experimental design guidelines. Therefore, we critically evaluated published untargeted metabolomic platforms used to characterize IEMs to summarize the strengths and areas for improvement of this technology as it progresses towards the clinical laboratory. A total of 96 distinct IEMs were collectively evaluated by the included studies. However, most of these IEMs were evaluated by a single untargeted metabolomic method, in a single study, with a limited cohort size (55/96, 57%). The goals of the included studies generally fell into two, often overlapping, categories: detecting known biomarkers from many biochemically distinct IEMs using a single platform, and detecting novel metabolites or metabolic pathways. There was notable diversity in the design of the untargeted metabolomic platforms. Importantly, the majority of studies reported adherence to quality metrics, including the use of quality control samples and internal standards in their experiments, as well as confirmation of at least some of their feature annotations with commercial reference standards. Future applications of untargeted metabolomics platforms to the study of IEMs should move beyond single-subject analyses, and evaluate reproducibility using a prospective, or validation cohort.

Downstream Assays for Variant Resolution: Epigenetics, RNA Sequnncing, and Metabolomics

As the availability of advanced molecular testing like whole exome and genome sequencing expands, it comes with the added complication of interpreting inconclusive results, including determining the relevance of variants of uncertain significance or failing to find a variant in an otherwise suspected specific genetic disorder. This complication necessitates the use of alternative testing methods to gather more information in support of, or against, a particular genetic diagnosis. Therefore, new genome-wide approaches, including DNA epigenetic testing, RNA sequencing, and metabolomics, are increasingly being used to increase the diagnostic yield when used in conjunction with more conventional genetic tests.

Metabolomic Studies in Inborn Errors of Metabolism: Last Years and Future Perspectives

The inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs or Inherited Metabolic Disorders) are a heterogeneous group of diseases caused by a deficit of some specific metabolic pathways. IEMs may present with multiple overlapping symptoms, sometimes difficult delayed diagnosis and postponed therapies. Additionally, many IEMs are not covered in newborn screening and the diagnostic profiling in the metabolic laboratory is indispensable to reach a correct diagnosis. In recent years, Metabolomics helped to obtain a better understanding of pathogenesis and pathophysiology of IEMs, by validating diagnostic biomarkers, discovering new specific metabolic patterns and new IEMs itself. The expansion of Metabolomics in clinical biochemistry and laboratory medicine has brought these approaches in clinical practice as part of newborn screenings, as an exam for differential diagnosis between IEMs, and evaluation of metabolites in follow up as markers of severity or therapies efficacy. Lastly, several research groups are trying to profile metabolomics data in platforms to have a holistic vision of the metabolic, proteomic and genomic pathways of every single patient. In 2018 this team has made a review of literature to understand the value of Metabolomics in IEMs. Our review offers an update on use and perspectives of metabolomics in IEMs, with an overview of the studies available from 2018 to 2022.

Chances of Liver Transplantation in a Patient With Transaldolase Deficiency Complicated by Hepatopulmonary Syndrome

Eyaid's syndrome or Transaldolase Deficiency (TD) (OMIM 606003) is a rare autosomal recessive inborn error of metabolism. In this report, we describe the case of an eight-year-old Saudi girl with a history of hepatosplenomegaly since infancy, who presented to the emergency department for a short history of cough and worsening cyanosis. She had growth retardation, facial dysmorphia, cardiac defect, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia, besides hepatosplenomegaly. A thorough investigation led to the diagnosis of hepatopulmonary syndrome and whole exome sequencing showed a homozygous frameshift variant in the TALDO1gene, c.793del, p.Gln265fs. Thus, the patient was diagnosed with TD complicated with hepatopulmonary syndrome, and the indication of liver transplantation was discussed.

A Comprehensive Mass Spectrometry-Based Workflow for Clinical Metabolomics Cohort Studies

As a comprehensive analysis of all metabolites in a biological system, metabolomics is being widely applied in various clinical/health areas for disease prediction, diagnosis, and prognosis. However, challenges remain in dealing with the metabolomic complexity, massive data, metabolite identification, intra- and inter-individual variation, and reproducibility, which largely limit its widespread implementation. This study provided a comprehensive workflow for clinical metabolomics, including sample collection and preparation, mass spectrometry (MS) data acquisition, and data processing and analysis. Sample collection from multiple clinical sites was strictly carried out with standardized operation procedures (SOP). During data acquisition, three types of quality control (QC) samples were set for respective MS platforms (GC-MS, LC-MS polar, and LC-MS lipid) to assess the MS performance, facilitate metabolite identification, and eliminate contamination. Compounds annotation and identification were implemented with commercial software and in-house-developed PAppLine^TM and Ulib^MS library. The batch effects were removed using a deep learning model method (NormAE). Potential biomarkers identification was performed with tree-based modeling algorithms including random forest, AdaBoost, and XGBoost. The modeling performance was evaluated using the F1 score based on a 10-times repeated trial for each. Finally, a sub-cohort case study validated the reliability of the entire workflow.

A narrative review of metabolomics in the era of "-omics": integration into clinical practice for inborn errors of metabolism

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Traditional targeted metabolomic investigations identify a pre-defined list of analytes in samples and have been widely used for decades in the diagnosis and monitoring of inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs). Recent technological advances have resulted in the development and maturation of untargeted metabolomics: a holistic, unbiased, analytical approach to detecting metabolic disturbances in human disease. We aim to provide a summary of untargeted metabolomics [focusing on tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS)] and its application in the field of IEMs.

METHODS

Data for this review was identified through a literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and personal repositories of articles collected by the authors. Findings are presented within several sections describing the metabolome, the current use of targeted metabolomics in the diagnostic pathway of patients with IEMs, the more recent integration of untargeted metabolomics into clinical care, and the limitations of this newly employed analytical technique.

KEY CONTENT AND FINDINGS

Untargeted metabolomic investigations are increasingly utilized in screening for rare disorders, improving understanding of cellular and subcellular physiology, discovering novel biomarkers, monitoring therapy, and functionally validating genomic variants. Although the untargeted metabolomic approach has some limitations, this "next generation metabolic screening" platform is becoming increasingly affordable and accessible.

CONCLUSIONS

When used in conjunction with genomics and the other promising "-omic" technologies, untargeted metabolomics has the potential to revolutionize the diagnostics of IEMs (and other rare disorders), improving both clinical and health economic outcomes.

Analysis of endogenous metabolites using multifunctional derivatization and capillary RPLC-MS

Heterogeneity in metabolite structure and charge state complicates their analysis in electrospray mass spectrometry (ESI-MS). Complications such as diminished signal response and quantitation can be reduced by sequential dual-stage derivatization and capillary RP LC-ESI-MS analysis. Our sequential dual-stage chemical derivatization reacts analyte primary amine and hydroxyl groups with a linear acyl chloride head containing a tertiary amine moiety. Analyte carboxylate groups are then coupled to a linear amine tag with a tertiary amine moiety. This increase in the number of tags on analytes increases analyte proton affinity and hydrophobicity. We derivatized 250 metabolite standards which on average improved signal to noise by >44-fold, with an average limit of detection of 66 nM and R² of 0.98. This system detected 107 metabolites from 18 BAECs, 111 metabolites from human urine, and 153 from human serum based on retention time, exact mass, and MS/MS matches from a derivatized standard library. As a proof of concept, aortic endothelial cells were treated with epinephrine and analyzed by the dual-stage derivatization. We observed changes in 32 metabolites with many increases related to energy metabolism, specifically in the TCA cycle. A decrease in lactate levels and corresponding increase in pyruvate levels suggest that epinephrine causes a movement away from glycolytic reliance on energy and a shift towards the more efficient TCA respiration for increasing energy.

Clinical metabolomics for inborn errors of metabolism

Metabolism is a highly regulated process that provides nutrients to cells and essential building blocks for the synthesis of protein, DNA and other macromolecules. In healthy biological systems, metabolism maintains a steady state in which the concentrations of metabolites are relatively constant yet are subject to metabolic demands and environmental stimuli. Rare genetic disorders, such as inborn errors of metabolism (IEM), cause defects in regulatory enzymes or proteins leading to metabolic pathway disruption and metabolite accumulation or deficiency. Traditionally, the laboratory diagnosis of IEMs has been limited to analytical methods that target specific metabolites such as amino acids and acyl carnitines. This approach is effective as a screening method for the most common IEM disorders but lacks the comprehensive coverage of metabolites that is necessary to identify rare disorders that present with nonspecific clinical symptoms. Fortunately, advancements in technology and data analytics has introduced a new field of study called metabolomics which has allowed scientists to perform comprehensive metabolite profiling of biological systems to provide insight into mechanism of action and gene function. Since metabolomics seeks to measure all small molecule metabolites in a biological specimen, it provides an innovative approach to evaluating disease in patients with rare genetic disorders. In this review we provide insight into the appropriate application of metabolomics in clinical settings. We discuss the advantages and limitations of the method and provide details related to the technology, data analytics and statistical modeling required for metabolomic profiling of patients with IEMs.

Comparison of Untargeted Metabolomic Profiling vs Traditional Metabolic Screening to Identify Inborn Errors of Metabolism

IMPORTANCE

Recent advances in newborn screening (NBS) have improved the diagnosis of inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs); however, many potentially treatable IEMs are not included on NBS panels, nor are they covered in standard, first-line biochemical testing.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the utility of untargeted metabolomics as a primary screening tool for IEMs by comparing the diagnostic rate of clinical metabolomics with the recommended traditional metabolic screening approach.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This cross-sectional study compares data from 4464 clinical samples received from 1483 unrelated families referred for trio testing of plasma amino acids, plasma acylcarnitine profiling, and urine organic acids (June 2014 to October 2018) and 2000 consecutive plasma samples from 1807 unrelated families (July 2014 to February 2019) received for clinical metabolomic screening at a College of American Pathologists and Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-certified biochemical genetics laboratory. Data analysis was performed from September 2019 to August 2020.

EXPOSURES

Metabolic and molecular tests performed at a genetic testing reference laboratory in the US and available clinical information for each patient were assessed to determine diagnostic rate.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The diagnostic rate of traditional metabolic screening compared with clinical metabolomic profiling was assessed in the context of expanded NBS.

RESULTS

Of 1483 cases screened by the traditional approach, 912 patients (61.5%) were male and 1465 (98.8%) were pediatric (mean [SD] age, 4.1 [6.0] years; range, 0-65 years). A total of 19 families were identified with IEMs, resulting in a 1.3% diagnostic rate. A total of 14 IEMs were detected, including 3 conditions not included in the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for NBS. Of the 1807 unrelated families undergoing plasma metabolomic profiling, 1059 patients (58.6%) were male, and 1665 (92.1%) were pediatric (mean [SD] age, 8.1 [10.4] years; range, 0-80 years). Screening identified 128 unique cases with IEMs, giving an overall diagnostic rate of 7.1%. In total, 70 different metabolic conditions were identified, including 49 conditions not presently included on the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel for NBS.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

These findings suggest that untargeted metabolomics provided a 6-fold higher diagnostic yield compared with the conventional screening approach and identified a broader spectrum of IEMs. Notably, with the expansion of NBS programs, traditional metabolic testing approaches identify few disorders beyond those covered on the NBS. These data support the capability of clinical untargeted metabolomics in screening for IEMs and suggest that broader screening approaches should be considered in the initial evaluation for metabolic disorders.