Low incidence of stroke in ambulatory patients with heart failure: a prospective study

Cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke : Echocardiography, CT, or MRI?

About 20–25% of all ischemic strokes are of cardioembolic etiology, with atrial fibrillation and heart failure as the most common underlying pathologies. Diagnostic work-up by noninvasive cardiac imaging is essential since it may lead to changes in therapy, e.g., in—but not exclusively—secondary stroke prevention. Echocardiography remains the cornerstone of cardiac imaging after ischemic stroke, with the combination of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography as gold standard thanks to their high sensitivity for many common pathologies. Transesophageal echocardiography should be considered as the initial diagnostic tool when a cardioembolic source of stroke is suspected. However, to date, there is no proven benefit of transesophageal echocardiography-related therapy changes on the main outcomes after ischemic stroke. Based on the currently available data, cardiac computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging should be regarded as complementary methods to echocardiography, providing additional information in specific situations; however, they cannot be recommended as first-line modalities.

Cardiac MRI and radionuclide ventriculography for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction in ICD candidates

OBJECTIVE

Current guidelines provide left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) criterion for use of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) but do not specify which modality to use for measurement. We compared LVEF measurements by radionuclide ventriculography (RNV) vs cardiac MRI (CMR) in ICD candidates to assess impact on clinical decision making.

METHODS

This single-centre study included 124 consecutive patients referred for assessment of ICD implantation who underwent RNV and CMR within 30 days for LVEF measurement. RNV and CMR were interpreted independently by experienced readers.

RESULTS

Among 124 patients (age 64 ± 11 years, 77% male), median interval between CMR and RNV was 1 day; mean LVEF was 32 ± 12% by CMR and 33 ± 11% by RNV (p = 0.60). LVEF by CMR and RNV showed good correlation, but Bland-Altman analysis showed relatively wide limits of agreement (-12.1 to 11.4). CMR LVEF reclassified 26 (21%) patients compared to RNV LVEF (kappa = 0.58). LVEF by both modalities showed good interobserver reproducibility (ICC 0.96 and 0.94, respectively) (limits of agreement -7.27 to 5.75 and -8.63 to 6.34, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Although LVEF measurements by CMR and RNV show moderate agreement, there is frequent reclassification of patients for ICD placement based on LVEF between these modalities. Future studies should determine if a particular imaging modality for LVEF measurement may enhance ICD decision making and treatment benefit.

Role of Antiplatelet Therapy and Anticoagulation in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

Heart failure continues to be a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the United States. The pathophysiology of heart failure involves the activation of complex neurohormonal pathways, many of which mediate not only hypertrophy and fibrosis within ventricular myocardium and interstitium, but also activation of platelets and alteration of vascular endothelium. Platelet activation and vascular endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the observed increased risk of thromboembolic events in patients with chronic heart failure. However, current data from clinical trials do not support the routine use of chronic antiplatelet or oral anticoagulation therapy for ambulatory heart failure patients without other indications (atrial fibrillation and/or coronary artery disease) as the risk of bleeding seems to outweigh the potential benefit related to reduction in thromboembolic events. In this review, we consider the potential clinical utility of targeting specific pathophysiological mechanisms of platelet and vascular endothelial activation to guide clinical decision making in heart failure patients.

Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Risk of Stroke and Cardiac Events in Heart Failure: Data From the Warfarin Versus Aspirin in Reduced Ejection Fraction Trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In heart failure (HF), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is inversely associated with mortality and cardiovascular outcomes. Its relationship with stroke is controversial, as is the effect of antithrombotic treatment. We studied the relationship of LVEF with stroke and cardiovascular events in patients with HF and the effect of different antithrombotic treatments.

METHODS

In the Warfarin Versus Aspirin in Reduced Ejection Fraction (WARCEF) trial, 2305 patients with systolic HF (LVEF≤35%) and sinus rhythm were randomized to warfarin or aspirin and followed for 3.5±1.8 years. Although no differences between treatments were observed on primary outcome (death, stroke, or intracerebral hemorrhage), warfarin decreased the stroke risk. The present report compares the incidence of stroke and cardiovascular events across different LVEF and treatment subgroups.

RESULTS

Baseline LVEF was inversely and linearly associated with primary outcome, mortality and its components (sudden and cardiovascular death), and HF hospitalization, but not myocardial infarction. A relationship with stroke was only observed for LVEF of <15% (incidence rates: 2.04 versus 0.95/100 patient-years; P=0.009), which more than doubled the adjusted stroke risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.125; 95% CI, 1.182-3.818; P=0.012). In warfarin-treated patients, each 5% LVEF decrement significantly increased the stroke risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.346; 95% CI, 1.044-1.737; P=0.022; P value for interaction=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with systolic HF and sinus rhythm, LVEF is inversely associated with death and its components, whereas an association with stroke exists for very low LVEF values. An interaction with warfarin treatment on stroke risk may exist.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00041938.

Thromboembolic risk stratification of patients hospitalized with heart failure in sinus rhythm: a nationwide cohort study

AIMS

Patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm are at an increased risk of thromboembolic complications. So far, validated risk stratification tools are lacking for such patients, which makes the decision to initiate anti-thrombotic treatment difficult.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We included 136,545 patients admitted with heart failure in sinus rhythm from national registries from 1999 to 2012. Patients receiving oral anticoagulants were omitted from the study. First, we investigated if the CHA2DS2-VASc score could identify heart failure patients in sinus rhythm with high rates of thromboembolic complications. Second, we investigated if any single CHA2DS2-VASc risk factor carried a greater prognostic value with regard to thromboembolism. The risk of thromboembolism increased more than ninefold (hazard ratio 9.2, 95% confidence interval 6.8-12.5) in patients with all CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors compared with those with heart failure alone. The incidence rates of thromboembolism were clinically significant, averaging 6.0 (95% confidence interval 5.98-6.02) events per 100 patient years during the first year following diagnosis. Risk factors such as diabetes, age, vascular disease, and especially previous thromboembolism, conferred an independent risk of future thromboembolism.

CONCLUSION

The CHA2DS2-VASc risk stratification scheme was able to provide prognostic information on future thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm. The CHA2DS2-VASc scale could be easily implemented as an aid to clinicians in risk stratifying heart failure patients in sinus rhythm, for thromboembolism.

Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction in patients eligible for ICD therapy: Discrepancy between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and 2D echocardiography

Objective

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) and cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) have substantially improved the survival of patients with cardiomyopathy. Eligibility for this therapy requires a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35 %. This is largely based on studies using echocardiography. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is increasingly utilised for LVEF assessment, but several studies have shown differences between LVEF assessed by CMR and echocardiography. The present study compared LVEF assessment by CMR and echocardiography in a heart failure population and evaluated effects on eligibility for device therapy.

Methods

152 patients (106 male, mean age 65.5 ± 9.9 years) referred for device therapy were included. During evaluation of eligibility they underwent both CMR and echocardiographic LVEF assessment. CMR volumes were computed from a stack of short-axis images. Echocardiographic volumes were computed using Simpson’s biplane method.

Results

The study population demonstrated an underestimation of end-diastolic volume (EDV) and end-systolic volume (ESV) by echocardiography of 71 ± 53 ml (mean ± SD) and 70 ± 49 ml, respectively. This resulted in an overestimation of LVEF of 6.6 ± 8.3 % by echocardiography compared with CMR (echocardiographic LVEF 31.5 ± 8.7 % and CMR LVEF 24.9 ± 9.6 %). 28 % of patients had opposing outcomes of eligibility for cardiac device therapy depending on the imaging modality used.

Conclusion

We found EDV and ESV to be underestimated by echocardiography, and LVEF assessed by CMR to be significantly smaller than by echocardiography. Applying an LVEF cut-off value of 35 %, CMR would significantly increase the number of patients eligible for device implantation. Therefore, LVEF cut-off values might need reassessment when using CMR.

Value of CMR for the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of CMR features for the differential diagnosis of cardiac masses.

BACKGROUND

Differentiation of cardiac tumors and thrombi and differentiation of benign from malignant cardiac neoplasms is often challenging but important in clinical practice. Studies assessing the value of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in this regard are scarce.

METHODS

We reviewed the CMR scans of patients with a definite cardiac thrombus or tumor. Mass characteristics on cine, T1-weighted turbo spin echo (T1w-TSE) and T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2w-TSE), contrast first-pass perfusion (FPP), post-contrast inversion time (TI) scout, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were 84 thrombi, 17 benign tumors, and 25 malignant tumors in 116 patients. Morphologically, thrombi were smaller (median area 1.6 vs. 8.5 cm(2); p < 0.0001), more homogeneous (99% vs. 46%; p < 0.0001), and less mobile (13% vs. 33%; p = 0.007) than tumors. Hyperintensity compared with normal myocardium on T2w-TSE, FPP, and LGE were more common in tumors than in thrombi (85% vs. 42%, 70% vs. 4%, and 71% vs. 5%, respectively; all p < 0.0001). A pattern of hyperintensity/isointensity (compared with normal myocardium) with short TI and hypointensity with long TI was very frequent in thrombi (94%), rare in tumors (2%), and had the highest accuracy (95%) for the differentiation of both entities. Regarding the characterization of neoplastic masses, malignant tumors were larger (median area 11.9 vs. 6.3 cm(2); p = 0.006) and more frequently exhibited FPP (84% vs. 47%; p = 0.03) and LGE (92% vs. 41%; p = 0.001). The ability of CMR features to distinguish benign from malignant neoplasms was moderate, with LGE showing the highest accuracy (79%).

CONCLUSIONS

CMR features demonstrated excellent accuracy for the differentiation of cardiac thrombi from tumors and can be helpful for the distinction of benign versus malignant neoplasms.

Thromboembolism and antithrombotic therapy for heart failure in sinus rhythm: an executive summary of a joint consensus document from the ESC Heart Failure Association and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis

Chronic heart failure (HF) with either reduced or preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction is common and remains an extremely serious disorder with a high mortality and morbidity. Many complications related to heart failure can be related to thrombosis. Epidemiological and pathophysiological data also link HF to an increased risk of thrombosis, leading to the clinical consequences of sudden death, stroke, systemic thromboembolism and/or venous thromboembolism. This executive summary of a joint consensus document of the Heart Failure Association (EHFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis reviews the published evidence, summarises 'best practice', and puts forward consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and assist management decisions in everyday clinical practice. In HF patients with atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation is clearly recommended, and the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores should be used to determine the likely risk-benefit ratio (thromboembolism prevention versus risk of bleeding) of oral anticoagulation. In HF patients with reduced LV ejection fraction who are in sinus rhythm there is no evidence of an overall benefit of vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin) on mortality, with risk of major bleeding. Whilst there is the potential for a reduction in ischaemic stroke, there is currently no compelling reason to routinely use warfarin for these patients. Risk factors associated with increased risk of thromboembolic events should be identified and decisions regarding use of anticoagulation individualised. Patient values and preferences are important determinants when balancing the risk of thromboembolism against bleeding risk. Novel oral anticoagulants that offer a different risk-benefit profile compared with warfarin may appear as an attractive therapeutic option, but this would need to be confirmed in clinical trials.

Potential clinical impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of ejection fraction on eligibility for cardioverter defibrillator implantation

BACKGROUND

For the primary prevention of sudden cardiac death, guidelines provide left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) criteria for implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) placement without specifying the technique by which it should be measured. We sought to investigate the potential impact of performing cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) for EF on ICD eligibility.

METHODS

The study population consisted of patients being considered for ICD implantation who were referred for EF assessment by CMR. Patients who underwent CMR within 30 days of echocardiography were included. Echocardiographic EF was determined by Simpson's biplane method and CMR EF was measured by Simpson's summation of discs method.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients (age 62±15 years, 81% male) had a mean EF of 38 ± 14% by echocardiography and 35 ± 14% by CMR. CMR had greater reproducibility than echocardiography for both intra-observer (ICC, 0.98 vs 0.94) and inter-observer comparisons (ICC 0.99 vs 0.93). The limits of agreement comparing CMR and echocardiographic EF were - 16 to +10 percentage points. CMR resulted in 11 of 52 (21%) and 5 of 52 (10%) of patients being reclassified regarding ICD eligibility at the EF thresholds of 35 and 30% respectively. Among patients with an echocardiographic EF of between 25 and 40%, 9 of 22 (41%) were reclassified by CMR at either the 35 or 30% threshold. Echocardiography identified only 1 of the 6 patients with left ventricular thrombus noted incidentally on CMR.

CONCLUSIONS

CMR resulted in 21% of patients being reclassified regarding ICD eligibility when strict EF criteria were used. In addition, CMR detected unexpected left ventricular thrombus in almost 10% of patients. Our findings suggest that the use of CMR for EF assessment may have a substantial impact on management in patients being considered for ICD implantation.

Thrombo-embolism and antithrombotic therapy for heart failure in sinus rhythm. A joint consensus document from the ESC Heart Failure Association and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis

Chronic heart failure (HF) with either reduced or preserved ejection fraction is common and remains an extremely serious disorder with a high mortality and morbidity. Many complications related to HF can be related to thrombosis. Epidemiological and pathophysiological data also link HF to an increased risk of thrombosis, leading to the clinical consequences of sudden death, stroke, systemic thrombo-embolism, and/or venous thrombo-embolism. This consensus document of the Heart Failure Association (EHFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis reviews the published evidence and summarizes 'best practice', and puts forward consensus statements that may help to define evidence gaps and assist management decisions in everyday clinical practice. In HF patients with atrial fibrillation, oral anticoagulation is recommended, and the CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc and HAS-BLED scores should be used to determine the likely risk-benefit ratio (thrombo-embolism prevention vs. risk of bleeding) of oral anticoagulation. In HF patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction who are in sinus rhythm there is no evidence of an overall benefit of vitamin K antagonists (e.g. warfarin) on mortality, with risk of major bleeding. Despite the potential for a reduction in ischaemic stroke, there is currently no compelling reason to use warfarin routinely for these patients. Risk factors associated with increased risk of thrombo-embolic events should be identified and decisions regarding use of anticoagulation individualized. Patient values and preferences are important determinants when balancing the risk of thrombo-embolism against bleeding risk. New oral anticoagulants that offer a different risk-benefit profile compared with warfarin may appear as an attractive therapeutic option, but this would need to be confirmed in clinical trials.

Left ventricular thrombus attenuation characterization in cardiac computed tomography angiography

BACKGROUND

Because of their similar visual appearance, differentiation of left ventricular thrombotic material and myocardial wall can be difficult in contrast-enhanced coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography.

OBJECTIVE

We identified typical thrombi attenuation of left ventricular thrombi with the use of CT measurement.

METHODS

Over a time period of 6 years, we retrospectively identified 31 patients who showed a left ventricular thrombus in CT angiography datasets. Patients underwent routine contrast cardiac CT to investigate coronary artery disease. CT attenuation of each thrombus was assessed in the 4-chamber view. CT densities were also determined in the ascending aorta, left ventricle, and myocardial wall both in the mid-septal and mid-lateral segments. The mean CT attenuation of thrombi and the difference between attenuation in thrombi, left ventricular cavity, and myocardial wall were determined. The ratio of attenuation values in thrombus versus aorta and myocardium versus aorta were also determined.

RESULTS

Mean (±SD) CT attenuation of all left ventricular thrombi in 31 patients was 43.2 ± 15.3 HU (range, 25-80 HU). Mean CT densities of septal and lateral myocardial wall were 102.9 ± 23.1 HU (range, 63-155 HU) and 99.3 ± 28.7 HU (range, 72-191 HU), respectively, and were thus significantly higher than the CT attenuation of thrombi (P < 0.001). A threshold of 65 HU yielded a sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 94%, 97%, 94%, and 97%, respectively, to differentiate thrombus from the myocardial wall. The mean ratio between CT attenuation of thrombus and CT attenuation within the ascending aorta was 0.11 ± 0.05 (range, 0.04-0.23), which was significantly lower compared with the mean ratio between CT attenuation of the myocardial wall and the CT attenuation within the ascending aorta.

CONCLUSION

CT attenuation within left ventricular thrombi was significantly lower than myocardial attenuation in CT angiography datasets. Assessment of CT attenuation may contribute to the differentiation of thrombi.

Antithrombotic therapy in cardiac embolism

Anticoagulation is indicated in most cardioembolic ischemic strokes for secondary prevention. In many cardiac conditions, anticoagulation is also indication for primary stroke prevention, mainly when associated to vascular risk factors. Anticoagulation should be started as soon as possible, as it is safe even in moderate acute strokes. The efficacy of early anticoagulation after cardioembolic stroke in relation to outcome has not been assessed adequately, but there is evidence from animal models and clinical studies that anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin is associated with a better outcome mediated in part by its anti-inflammatory properties.

Antithrombotic medication for cardioembolic stroke prevention

Embolism of cardiac origin accounts for about 20% of ischemic strokes. Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation is the most frequent cause of cardioembolic stroke. Approximately 1% of population is affected by atrial fibrillation, and its prevalence is growing with ageing in the modern world. Strokes due to cardioembolism are in general severe and prone to early recurrence and have a higher long-term risk of recurrence and mortality. Despite its enormous preventive potential, continuous oral anticoagulation is prescribed for less than half of patients with atrial fibrillation who have risk factors for cardioembolism and no contraindications for anticoagulation. Available evidence does not support routine immediate anticoagulation of acute cardioembolic stroke. Anticoagulation therapy's associated risk of hemorrhage and monitoring requirements have encouraged the investigation of alternative therapies for individuals with atrial fibrillation. New anticoagulants being tested for prevention of stroke are low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH), unfractionated heparin, factor Xa inhibitors, or direct thrombin inhibitors like dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban. The later exhibit stable pharmacokinetics obviating the need for coagulation monitoring or dose titration, and they lack clinically significant food or drug interaction. Moreover, they offer another potential that includes fixed dosing, oral administration, and rapid onset of action. There are several concerns regarding potential harm, including an increased risk for hepatotoxicity, clinically significant bleeding, and acute coronary events. Therefore, additional trials and postmarketing surveillance will be needed.

Heart failure and the risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study

Patients with heart failure used to have an increased risk of stroke, but this may have changed with current treatment regimens. We assessed the association between heart failure and the risk of stroke in a population-based cohort that was followed since 1990. The study uses the cohort of the Rotterdam Study and is based on 7,546 participants who at baseline (1990–1993) were aged 55 years or over and free from stroke. The associations between heart failure and risk of stroke were assessed using time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors (smoking, diabetes mellitus, BMI, ankle brachial index, blood pressure, atrial fibrillation, myocardial infarction and relevant medication). At baseline, 233 participants had heart failure. During an average follow-up time of 9.7 years, 1,014 persons developed heart failure, and 827 strokes (470 ischemic, 75 hemorrhagic, 282 unclassified) occurred. The risk of ischemic stroke was more than five-fold increased in the first month after diagnosis of heart failure (age and sex adjusted HR 5.79, 95% CI 2.15–15.62), but attenuated over time (age and sex adjusted HR 3.50 [95% CI 1.96–6.25] after 1–6 months and 0.83 [95% CI 0.53–1.29] after 0.5–6 years). Additional adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors only marginally attenuated these risks. In conclusion, the risk of ischemic stroke is strongly increased shortly after the diagnosis of heart failure but returns to normal within 6 months after onset of heart failure.

[Neurology and cardiology: points of contact]

Strokes resulting from cardiac diseases, and cardiac abnormalities associated with neuromuscular disorders are examples of the many points of contact between neurology and cardiology. Approximately 20-30% of strokes are related to cardiac diseases, including atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, bacterial endocarditis, rheumatic and nonrheumatic valvular diseases, acute myocardial infarction with left ventricular thrombus, and cardiomyopathies associated with muscular dystrophies, among others. Strokes can also occur in the setting of cardiac interventions such as cardiac catheterization and coronary artery bypass procedures. Treatment to prevent recurrent stroke in any of these settings depends on the underlying etiology. Whereas anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists is proven to be superior to acetylsalicylic acid for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, the superiority of anticoagulants has not been conclusively established for stroke associated with congestive heart failure and is contraindicated in those with infective endocarditis. Ongoing trials are evaluating management strategies in patients with atrial level shunts due to patent foramen ovale. Cardiomyopathies and conduction abnormalities are part of the spectrum of many neuromuscular disorders including mitochondrial disorders and muscular dystrophies. Cardiologists and neurologists share responsibility for caring for patients with or at risk for cardiogenic strokes, and for screening and managing the heart disease associated with neuromuscular disorders.

Prevalence of stroke in systolic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Heart disease is a major independent risk factor for stroke, ranking third after age and hypertension. Heart failure (HF) patient constitutes an important subgroup of patients with stroke, because of their poor outcome and high rates of mortality and stroke recurrence. We examined the prevalence of stroke in patients with heart failure from 3 different geographic regions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We compared the prevalence of self-reported history of stroke in participants with systolic HF from 3 different geographic regions (Houma, LA; Miami, FL; and Tbilisi, Georgia, Eastern Europe). We examined the prevalence of stroke/adjusting for patient demographic and health characteristics. Stroke prevalence was reported by 79 (7.8%) of 1017 participants from Louisiana, 51 (9.2%) of 556 participants from Florida, and 5 (1.3%) of 383 participants from Georgia. After multivariable adjustment, the prevalence of stroke was significantly lower in Georgia compared to Florida and Louisiana sites. Patients on β-blocker medication were 3.58 times (95% CI 1.96-6.55) more likely to report stroke compared to those without β-blockers (×2 = 19.5, P ≤ .0001). There were significantly fewer participants on β-blockers from Georgia (7%) compared to participants from Florida (87%) and Louisiana (94%; (×2 = 24.3, P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-reported stroke prevalence in participants with HF was not consistent among the 3 sites. These differences in prevalence may in part be explained by the lower reported use of β-blockers in the Georgia site. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether β-blockers increase the risk of stroke in HF population.

Dilated cardiomyopathy and role of antithrombotic therapy

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus as to whether anticoagulation has a favorable risk:benefit in reducing thromboembolic events in patients with heart failure (HF) secondary to dilated cardiomyopathy who do not suffer from atrial fibrillation or primary valvular disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The literature reviewed on this topic included most recent and ongoing studies that assessed the use of anticoagulation for this population. Several large retrospective studies showed an increased risk of thromboembolic events among patients with depressed left ventricular function. The relative risk of stroke in individuals with HF from all causes was found to be 4.1 for men and 2.8 for women, but confounding comorbidities (such as atrial fibrillation and coronary artery disease) were commonly present. Currently, there are no randomized prospective trials to guide the use of antithrombotics for these patients, and the risk of bleeding secondary to anticoagulation has limited the use of oral anticoagulants for prevention of thrombosis. Among patients with HF, increasing age directly correlates with both major bleeding and thromboembolic events, with a 46% relative risk of bleeding for each 10-year increase in age older than 40 years.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, there is no agreement on appropriate antithrombotic treatment (if any) for primary thromboembolism prophylaxis in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy with sinus rhythm. In recent years, several promising prospective trials were terminated prematurely due to inadequate enrollment. The Warfarin Aspirin-Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction trial may provide evidence regarding the use of anticoagulation for patients with decreased myocardial function.

Association of diagnosis of ischaemic heart disease, diabetes mellitus and heart failure with cognitive function in the elderly population

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the association between ischaemic heart disease (IHD), diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) and the prevalence of cognitive impairment.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional, community-based study in Karlskrona, Sweden, 1402 participants of the Swedish National Study on Ageing and Care (60-96 y) underwent a medical examination and psychological testing including the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Of these, 58% stated that they were treated for hypertension, IHD, DM or HF, or had ECG abnormalities (positive screen).

RESULTS

The prevalence of cognitive impairment (MMSE score < 24) in patients treated for IHD, DM or HF was 28.5% compared to 16.1% in the population with a negative screen without cardiovascular disease or DM. After stratification by age, the difference was seen to be due to a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment in the age group 70-79 y, where 68.8% of the cognitively impaired came from the group treated for IHD, DM or HF. The odds ratio for cognitive impairment in this age group was 4.4 (95% CI 1.7-11.4), when compared to those with a negative screen as baseline.

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that the patient group treated for IHD, DM or HF has a higher prevalence of cognitive impairment and a higher risk of developing early cognitive impairment between the ages of 70 and 79 y. Although this study has not provided conclusive evidence that cardiovascular disease and DM are associated with the early development of cognitive impairment, it provides incentive for further studies.

Anticoagulation in patients with heart failure and normal sinus rhythm

PURPOSE

The evidence evaluating the risk of thrombosis and the efficacy and risk of anticoagulation in patients with systolic heart failure (HF) and normal sinus rhythm is reviewed.

SUMMARY

Although a subject of investigation for over 50 years, use of anticoagulation in patients with HF remains an area of controversy and clinical debate. While early studies reported variable thromboembolism rates in HF (1.9-42.4 events per 100 patient years), the annual rate from larger and more recent trials ranged from 1% to 3%. The trials evaluating the role of oral anticoagulants to reduce thromboembolism and mortality outcomes in patients with a reduced ejection fraction (EF) have provided ambiguous results. Early studies and post hoc analyses of large clinical trials have demonstrated a reduction in thromboembolic events, risk of stroke, and mortality. In contrast, recent underpowered prospective controlled studies found no benefit in the use of warfarin in patients with systolic HF and normal sinus rhythm. The low-to-moderate risk of thromboembolism in patients with HF and the questionable benefit of anticoagulation need to be weighed against the potential for hemorrhagic complications caused by this therapy. The available data collectively suggest that the risk of using warfarin in patients with reduced EF may outweigh any possible benefit, if one exists at all.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation therapy in patients with HF and normal sinus rhythm is not supported by the limited evidence. The benefits of anticoagulation in such patients may not compensate for the relatively high risk of major bleeding caused by the treatment.

Thromboembolic Complications in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Dilated Cardiomyopathy Immediately After Initiation of Congestive Heart Failure Treatment: Just a Coincidence or Should We Pay More Attention?

Recently, we have experienced cerebrovascular embolic events in 2 consecutive patients in our outpatient clinic. Accordingly, we want to share our comments with literature on these 2 patients. Both patients had newly diagnosed left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, sinus rhythm, and cerebrovascular event within the first week after initiation of heart failure treatment. Although, our cases are not enough to make a general statement or conclusion, we can recommend that patients with newly diagnosed severe LV dysfunction with normal sinus rhythm and without echocardiographically visible thrombus should also be closely followed up for thromboembolic complications at least during the first weeks of congestive heart failure treatment.

Epidemiology of stroke in chronic heart failure patients with normal sinus rhythm: findings from the DIG stroke sub-study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the epidemiology of stroke in chronic systolic and diastolic heart failure (HF) patients in normal sinus rhythm (NSR) receiving angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Because all HF patients in the Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial (N=7788) were in NSR and nearly all were receiving ACE inhibitors, a survey-based stroke-sub-study was conducted but its findings have never been published.

METHODS

DIG investigators confirmed a total 222 cases of stroke of which 144 had neurological deficit ≥24 h. We used logistic regression models to determine predictors of incident stroke among all 7788 patients and predictors of neurological deficit ≥24 h and all-cause mortality among 222 stroke patients.

RESULTS

Age ≥65 years (adjusted odds ratio {AOR}, 1.36; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.02-1.80; P=0.035), nonwhite race (AOR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-0.99; P=0.047), hypertension (AOR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.11-1.94; P=0.008), diabetes mellitus (AOR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.82; P=0.030), and cardiomegaly (AOR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.03-1.86; P=0.030) were independent predictors of stroke. However, among those with stroke, nonwhites had higher odds of neurological deficits ≥24 h (AOR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.01-8.07; P=0.047) and death (AOR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.30-8.30; P=0.012).

CONCLUSION

Older age, hypertension, diabetes and cardiomegaly were associated with increased incidence of stroke among HF patients with NSR receiving ACE inhibitors. The association of race and stroke, however, was complex. While nonwhite race was associated with decreased risk of stroke, among those with stroke, nonwhite race was associated with increased stroke severity and mortality.

Detection of left ventricular thrombus by delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance prevalence and markers in patients with systolic dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to assess the prevalence and markers of left ventricular (LV) thrombus among patients with systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have yielded discordant findings regarding prevalence and markers of LV thrombus. Delayed-enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance (DE-CMR) identifies thrombus on the basis of tissue characteristics rather than just anatomical appearance and is potentially highly accurate.

METHODS

Prevalence of thrombus by DE-CMR was determined in 784 consecutive patients with systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <50%) imaged between July 2002 and July 2004. Patients were recruited from 2 separate institutions: a tertiary-care referral center and an outpatient clinic. Comparison to cine-cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) was performed. Follow-up was undertaken for thrombus verification via pathology evaluation or documented embolic event within 6 months after CMR. Clinical and imaging parameters were assessed to determine risk factors for thrombus.

RESULTS

Among this at-risk population (age 60 +/- 14 years; LVEF 32 +/- 11%), DE-CMR detected thrombus in 7% (55 patients) and cine-CMR in 4.7% (37 patients, p < 0.005). Follow-up was consistent with DE-CMR as a better reference standard than cine-CMR, including 100% detection among 5 patients with thrombus verified by pathology (cine-CMR, 40% detection), and logistic regression analysis testing the contributions of DE-CMR and cine-CMR simultaneously, which showed that only the presence of thrombus by DE-CMR was associated with follow-up end points (p < 0.005). Cine-CMR generally missed small intracavitary and small or large mural thrombus. In addition to traditional indices such as low LVEF and ischemic cardiomyopathy, multivariable analysis showed that increased myocardial scarring, an additional parameter available from DE-CMR, was an independent risk factor for thrombus.

CONCLUSIONS

In a broad cross section of patients with systolic dysfunction, thrombus prevalence was 7% by DE-CMR and included small intracavitary and small or large mural thrombus missed by cine-CMR. Prevalence increased with worse LVEF, ischemic etiology, and increased myocardial scarring.

Prevalence and determinants of cognitive impairment in chronic heart failure patients

Cognitive impairment has seldom been investigated in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). The authors' aim was to assess the prevalence and determinants of cognitive impairment in patients hospitalized for CHF decompensation. The authors prospectively performed the Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and completed a standardized questionnaire for cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) and transient ischemic attacks (TIA) in patients hospitalized for CHF decompensation during a 3-month period. A total of 83 patients were studied: 15 had a history of CVA or TIA, 51 (61%) had an MMSE score < or = 28 (or < or = 26 if schooling < or = 8 years), and 26 (31%) had an MMSE score <24. Factors associated with an MMSE score <24 were atrial fibrillation/flutter (odds ratio [OR], 8.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-34.6), New York Heart Association functional class IV (OR, 4.1; CI, 1.0-16.4), and schooling >8 years (OR, 0.2; CI, 0.0-0.8). Adjusting for history of CVA or TIA or excluding patients with a history of CVA or TIA did not affect the findings. Cognitive impairment is frequent in patients hospitalized for CHF decompensation whether or not they have a past history of CVA or TIA. The severity of cognitive impairment parallels that of CHF. The question of whether this cognitive impairment decreases adherence to treatment and contributes to a worse outcome in CHF patients should be explored.

The incidence of ischemic stroke in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is marked variability in the reported stroke rates among persons with heart failure (HF). We performed a meta-analysis to provide summary estimates of the stroke rate in HF and to explain heterogeneity in the existing literature. We will summarize the ischemic stroke rate at various time points during follow-up among adults with chronic heart failure.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic review of the electronic literature in Medline and PubMed as well as hand searching of the reference lists of identified articles and of the meeting abstracts for the 1995-2004 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association scientific sessions was performed to identify qualifying studies. Articles were included if they included a population with chronic HF and reported the number (or percent) of persons with HF who experienced an ischemic stroke during follow-up. Studies were excluded if the study population included > or = 50% of persons with acute (postmyocardial infarction) HF, or if > or = 50% of the study population required artificial support with a ventricular assist device or parenteral inotropic medications. Case reports, case series, and nonoriginal research articles were not included. Determination of study eligibility and data extraction were conducted by 2 independent reviewers using standardized forms. Results are reported as stroke rate per 1000 cases of HF, with 95% Poisson confidence intervals. Pooled estimates of the stroke rate were calculated with fixed and random effects models. Heterogeneity was explored according to a priori specified subgroup analyses. Overall, 26 studies met inclusion criteria. Eighteen of every 1000 persons suffered a stroke during the first year after the diagnosis of HF. The stroke rate increased to a maximum of 47.4 per 1000 at 5 years. Studies with fewer women, those conducted in 1990 or earlier, and cohort studies reported higher stroke rates than studies with more women, those conducted after 1990, and clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Stroke is an important complication among persons with HF. Variability among reported stroke rates can be explained in part by differences in study design, patient population, and HF standards of care at the time of the study. Despite the heterogeneity in reported stroke rates, this meta-analysis shows that stroke prevention in HF represents an opportunity to prevent morbidity and save many lives in this highly fatal disease.

Thromboembolic risk in the patient with heart failure

Although heart failure is a procoagulant state, the incidence of arterial thromboembolism (peripheral arterial emboli and strokes) is relatively low in the outpatient setting and seems to be higher in those with concomitant atrial fibrillation or recent large anterior myocardial infarction, especially in the presence of a dyskinetic apex. Hospitalized heart failure patients, on the other hand, have an extremely high rate of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli. Outpatients with heart failure should receive anticoagulation only in the presence of atrial fibrillation or if they have experienced a prior embolic event. Patients with recent large anterior infarction or recent infarction with documented thrombus should be treated with anticoagulation for the initial 3 months after the infarct, whereas those with evidence of a mural thrombus should receive anticoagulation at least until the thrombus has resolved. Heart failure patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy should receive antiplatelet agents for the prevention of myocardial infarction, stroke, or death. Antiplatelet agents should not be prescribed for heart failure patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy or without other evidence of atherosclerotic vascular disease. All hospitalized heart failure patients who are not taking oral anticoagulants should receive prophylaxis with low molecular weight heparins or factor Xa inhibitors.

Risk of Thromboembolism in Heart Failure

Background— In patients with heart failure, rates of clinically apparent stroke range from 1.3% to 3.5% per year. Little is known about the incidence and risk factors in the absence of atrial fibrillation. In the Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT), 2521 patients with moderate heart failure were randomized to receive amiodarone, implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), or placebo.

Methods and Results— We determined the incidence of stroke or peripheral or pulmonary embolism in patients with no history of atrial fibrillation (n=2114), predictors of thromboembolism and the relationship to left ventricular ejection fraction. Median follow-up was 45.5 months. Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% CIs) for the incidence of thromboembolism by 4 years were 4.0% (3.0% to 4.9%), with 2.6% (1.1% to 4.1%) in patients randomized to amiodarone, 3.2% (1.8% to 4.7%) in patients randomized to ICD, and 6.0% (4.0% to 8.0%) in patients randomized to placebo (approximate rates of 0.7%, 0.8%, and 1.5% per year, respectively). By multivariable analysis, hypertension ( P =0.021) and decreasing left ventricular ejection fraction ( P =0.023) were significant predictors of thromboembolism; treatment with amiodarone or ICD treatment was a significant predictor of thromboembolism-free survival ( P =0.014 for treatment effect; hazard ratio [95% CI] versus placebo, 0.57 [0.33 to 0.99] for ICD; 0.44 [0.24 to 0.80] for amiodarone). Inclusion of atrial fibrillation during follow-up in the multivariable model did not affect the significance of treatment assignment as a predictor of thromboembolism.

Conclusions— In the SCD-HeFT patient cohort, which reflects contemporary treatment of patients with moderately symptomatic systolic heart failure, patients experienced thromboembolism events at a rate of 1.7% per year without antiarrhythmic therapy. Those treated with amiodarone or ICDs had lower risk of thromboembolism than those given placebo. Hypertension at baseline and lower ejection fraction were independent predictors of risk.

Antithrombotic therapy in patients with chronic heart failure: rationale, clinical evidence and practical implications

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is traditionally associated with increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Key features of CHF pathophysiology, such as impairment of intracardiac hemodynamics, peripheral blood flow deceleration, neuroendocrine activation, chronic oxidative stress and proinflammatory changes, could explain the predisposition to thromboembolism. However, conclusive epidemiologic data on thromboembolic event incidence in CHF are lacking. Furthermore, the place of antithrombotic therapy in CHF management is still uncertain. Apart from established indications for warfarin (e.g. atrial fibrillation and previous embolic events), there is no robust evidence to support administration of vitamin K antagonists to other patients with CHF, particularly to patients in sinus rhythm. The role of aspirin in preventing thromboembolism in these patients is also controversial. Large randomized trial data on the effectiveness and risks of warfarin and aspirin use in CHF patients with sinus rhythm are forthcoming. This article provides a brief overview of the epidemiologic and pathobiological background of thromboembolism in CHF, and discusses the up-to-date clinical evidence on antithrombotic therapy in detail.

Congestive heart failure and Alzheimer's disease

The increase in average life expectancy is resulting in an increasing prevalence of major invalidating illnesses, such as cardiovascular disease and dementia. Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a chronic, progressive disease representing the advanced stage of cardiac illnesses. Cognitive impairment is known to be a frequent feature of CHF patients. The epidemiologic pictures of mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD) and CHF are predicted to worsen with the demographic expansion of the elderly population. Nevertheless, there has been little structured research on cognitive impairment in patients with CHF. This is unfortunate not only because CHF is the leading cause of hospitalization in the elderly and a leading cause of disability and death, but also for important clinical and socioeconomic implications including those related to comorbidity in advanced age and the need to early detect factors which may precipitate the conversion of MCI to AD. In this review, several aspects of the role of CHF in cognitive impairment are evaluated. Owing to the lack of studies focusing on CHF in AD, the pathophysiology of cardiac failure in cognitive impairment is addressed in light of possible preventive strategies against the onset of AD. These include prevention of oxygen radical and peroxynitrite production, supplementation of nitric oxide (NO) donors, as well as the achievement of an adequate antioxidant supply, better if obtained with a targeted and individualized nutritional approach. A systematic neuropsychologic testing of older patients with heart failure is to identify those with early cognitive impairment and promptly establish traditional therapies such as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, digoxin or beta-blockers. The neuropsychologic assessment in CHF patients is also fundamental to disclose conditions potentially favoring the onset of cognitive impairment such as depression. Finally, management schemes should include exercise training programs as well as patient and caregiver education.

Warfarin versus aspirin in patients with reduced cardiac ejection fraction (WARCEF): rationale, objectives, and design

BACKGROUND

Warfarin is widely prescribed for patients with heart failure without level 1 evidence, and an adequately powered randomized study is needed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction study is a National Institutes of Health-funded, randomized, double-blind clinical trial with a target enrollment of 2860 patients. It is designed to test with 90% power the 2-sided primary null hypothesis of no difference between warfarin (International Normalized Ratio 2.5-3) and aspirin (325 mg) in 3- to 5-year event-free survival for the composite endpoint of death, or stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic) among patients with cardiac ejection fraction < or =35% who do not have atrial fibrillation or mechanical prosthetic heart valves. Secondary analyses will compare warfarin and aspirin for reduction of all-cause mortality, ischemic stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI), balanced against the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage, among women and African Americans; and compare warfarin and aspirin for prevention of stroke alone. Randomization is stratified by site, New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart class (I vs II-IV), and stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 1 year before randomization versus no stroke or TIA in that period. NYHA class I patients will not exceed 20%, and the study has a target of 20% (or more) patients with stroke or TIA within 12 months. Randomized patients receive active warfarin plus placebo or active aspirin plus placebo, double-blind.

CONCLUSION

The results should help guide the selection of optimum antithrombotic therapy for patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Ischemic stroke after heart failure: a community-based study

BACKGROUND

Although studies have examined the incidence of stroke in heart failure (HF), their findings are inconsistent and difficult to interpret because of heterogeneity in study design and population. Although HF remains a highly fatal disease, the excess mortality imparted from stroke is unknown.

METHODS

A random sample of cases of HF from 1979 to 1999 was identified and validated according to Framingham criteria. Strokes were identified by screening medical diagnoses and subsequent physician validation. Stroke risk in HF was compared with the risk in the general population with standardized morbidity ratios. Associations between selected characteristics and stroke were examined using proportional hazards regression.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 630 persons with incident HF. During a median of 4.3 years of follow-up, 102 (16%) experienced an ischemic stroke. Heart failure was associated with a 17.4-fold increased risk for stroke compared with the general population in the first 30 days after HF diagnosis and remained elevated during 5 years of follow-up. Older persons with prior stroke or diabetes were more likely to experience stroke after HF diagnosis. Persons with stroke after HF were 2.31 times more likely to die compared with persons without stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

In the community, persons with HF have a large increase in the risk for ischemic stroke compared with the general population. Stroke results in a >2-fold increase in mortality. Thus, prevention of stroke has the potential to improve survival among patients with HF, particularly among the elderly and those with diabetes or prior stroke.

Cognitive Dysfunction in Advanced Heart Failure and Prospective Cardiac Assist Device Patients

BACKGROUND

Extended periods of hypoperfusion in an advanced heart failure (HF) places patients at high risk for neurobehavioral compromise, which has not been studied systematically. It is also not clear how intravenous inotropic therapy and mechanical cardiac assist devices (MCAD) affect cognitive function.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional cognitive preliminary study evaluated 252 potential heart transplant candidates assessing functions in memory, motor, and processing speed. Patients were divided into three HF groups based on severity of disease: group 1 outpatients (n = 113), group 2 in-patients requiring inotropic infusion (n = 83), and group 3 inpatients likely requiring MCAD support (n = 56). Aggregate z-scores for memory, motor, and processing speed and independent samples t tests assessed intergroup differences on 13 cognitive measures.

RESULTS

A broad pattern of cognitive impairment was observed within the advanced HF group; fewer deficits were found in group 1 outpatients and more severe deficits in group 3 MCAD subjects. A difference in motor functions was observed as the earliest abnormality, with group 3 showing significant changes compared with group 1. The most dramatic changes were seen in domain mental processing speed along with specific verbal and visual memory functions, which were slower in group 3 compared with groups 1 and 2.

CONCLUSIONS

Cognitive deficits are common in advanced HF and worsen with increasing severity of HF. Appropriately designed and randomized studies will be needed to demonstrate if earlier MCAD implantation is warranted to arrest cognitive dysfunction and better postimplantation adaptation.

Antithrombotic therapy for congestive heart failure

Patients with congestive heart failure (CHF) are at increased risk of thromboembolic events. However, there is much debate and uncertainty over the use of antithrombotic therapy in these patients. The evidence for oral anticoagulation is limited, although large randomised trial data are forthcoming. Aspirin may be detrimental for heart failure due to a possible interaction with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, leading to increased hospitalisations from decompensated heart failure. The objective of this review article is to summarise the available evidence regarding the risk of stroke and thromboembolic events in CHF patients, as well as the effectiveness and risks of antithrombotic therapy in these patients.

Pharmacological prevention of thromboembolism in patients with left ventricular dysfunction

Chronic left ventricular systolic dysfunction is a well recognized problem with an increasingly significant impact on healthcare in the form of congestive heart failure (CHF). Advances in medicine have led to improved survival after myocardial infarction (MI) and as a result, an increased prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. An increased incidence of thromboembolism, especially stroke, in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction is also well recognized. Pharmacological strategies to prevent stroke have been proposed in numerous studies. For example, anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure has been shown to reduce mortality rates and the incidence of stroke; however, its role in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and normal sinus rhythm is unclear and utilization of anticoagulation in these patients varies widely. The role of aspirin to prevent thromboembolism in patients with CHF is controversial. The relatively new pharmacological agent ximelagatran, which has an advantage of unmonitored oral administration has the potential to change the anticoagulation strategy in patients with heart failure. Important trials to define optimal therapy for reducing the risk of thromboembolism and death in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm include the recently reported WATCH (Warfarin and Antiplatelet Therapy in Chronic Heart failure) trial and the WARCEF (Warfarin versus Aspirin in Reduced Cardiac Ejection Fraction) trial, which is currently underway. The WATCH trial failed to outline significant differences between aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), warfarin, and clopidogrel in the primary composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke. Combined data from WATCH and WARCEF may provide sufficient statistical power to clarify outcomes such as stroke and death in patients with reduced cardiac ejection fraction. The pooled data may also help define optimal preventative measures for thromboembolism in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and sinus rhythm.

Prophylaxis of thromboembolic events in congestive heart failure

In patients with heart failure the incidence of thromboembolism is 0.9-5.5%/year (mean 1.9%/year), but no randomized studies are available to support the indication for anticoagulant therapy in those patients. Atrial fibrillation and previous thromboembolic events seem to be the major risk factors, whereas the effect of ventricular dysfunction has not been independently evaluated; nonetheless several studies suggest that thromboembolism is more likely among those patients with lower ejection fraction and lower peak exercise oxygen consumption. Anticoagulant therapy seems to be indicated also in patients with left ventricular aneurysm with mobile and protruding thrombi. Several studies of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy show that the incidence of thromboembolism ranges from 1.6 to 4.5%/year in patients not treated with anticoagulants, while it is virtually absent in anticoagulated patients. The clinical opportunity of long-term anticoagulant treatment in heart failure patients should be weighted not only on the clinical markers of thromboembolic risk, but also on the relative risk/benefit ratio of the single patient.

The effects of cognitive impairment on mortality among hospitalized patients with heart failure

PURPOSE

Cognitive impairment is a common, potentially reversible condition among older patients with heart failure. Because cerebral metabolic abnormalities have been associated with reduced survival in younger patients with advanced heart failure, we assessed the effect of cognitive impairment on the survival of older patients with heart failure.

METHODS

The association between cognitive dysfunction and in-hospital mortality was assessed in 1113 patients (mean [+/- SD] age, 78 +/- 9 years) who had been admitted for heart failure to 81 hospitals throughout Italy. One-year mortality was assessed in 968 patients with heart failure (age, 76 +/- 10 years) participating in the same study. Cognitive impairment was defined as a Hodkinson Abbreviated Mental Test score <7.

RESULTS

In-hospital death occurred in 65 (18%) of the 357 participants with cognitive impairment and in 26 (3%) of the 756 patients with normal cognition (P <0.0001). Out-of-hospital mortality was 27% (51/191) among patients with cognitive impairment and 15% (115/777) among other participants (P <0.0001). In multivariate Cox regression models, decreasing levels of cognitive functioning were associated with increasing in-hospital mortality; cognitive impairment was associated with an almost fivefold increase in mortality (relative risk = 4.9; 95% confidence interval: 2.9 to 8.3) after adjusting for several potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive impairment is an independent prognostic marker in older patients with heart failure. Assessment of cognitive functioning, even by simple screening tests, should be part of the routine assessment of elderly patients with heart failure.

Mechanisms underlying the development of atrial arrhythmias in heart failure

There is an important association between heart failure and the development of atrial arrhythmias. Although most often associated with atrial fibrillation, there is some evidence to suggest an association between heart failure and other atrial arrhythmias and, in particular, atrial flutter and atrial tachycardia. The mechanisms by which these common atrial arrhythmias may arise in patients with heart failure are discussed.