Effect of diabetes mellitus and insulin use on survival after acute myocardial infarction in the elderly (the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project)

Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Insulin-Treated Versus Non-Insulin Treated Diabetes Mellitus

There are conflicting data on whether patients with insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (ITDM) have poorer outcomes compared with non-insulin treated diabetic (non-ITDM) patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We therefore compared clinical outcomes following PCI in ITDM versus non-ITDM patients. We prospectively collected data on 4,579 patients with diabetes underwent PCI between 2005 and 2014 in a large multicenter registry and dichotomized them as having ITDM (n = 1,111) or non-ITDM (n = 3,468). The non-ITDM group was further divided into diet control only (diet-DM; n = 786) and those taking oral hypoglycemic agents (OHG-DM; n = 2,639), and clinical outcomes were compared with ITDM patients. Median follow-up for long-term mortality was 4.2 years (IQR 2.0 to 6.6 years). ITDM patients were more likely to be female, obese, and have severe renal impairment (all p <0.001). Procedural characteristics were similar other than a greater use of drug-eluting stents in ITDM patients. On multivariable analysis, ITDM was an independent predictor of 12-month major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE; OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.02 to1.55, p = 0.03). Dividing the non-ITDM group further by treatment, a progressively higher rate of 12-month MACCE across the 3 groups was observed (13.5% vs 17.9% vs 21.8%; p <0.001). Long-term mortality was similar in the diet-DM and OHG-DM groups, but significantly higher in the ITDM group on Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank p <0.001). In conclusion, there is a clear gradient of adverse outcomes with escalation of therapy from diet control to OHGs to insulin.

Decade-long trends (1999-2009) in the characteristics, management, and hospital outcomes of patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction with prior diabetes and chronic kidney disease

Background

Despite the increasing magnitude and impact, there are limited data available on the clinical management and in-hospital outcomes of patients who have diabetes mellitus (DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) at the time of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The objectives of our population-based observational study in residents of central Massachusetts were to describe decade-long trends (1999–2009) in the characteristics, in-hospital management, and hospital outcomes of AMI patients with and without these comorbidities.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 6,018 persons who were hospitalized for AMI on a biennial basis between 1999 and 2009 at all eleven medical centers in central Massachusetts. Our sample consisted of the following four groups: DM with CKD (n=587), CKD without DM (n=524), DM without CKD (n=1,442), and non-DM/non-CKD (n=3,465).

Results

Diabetic patients with CKD were more likely to have a higher prevalence of previously diagnosed comorbidities, to have developed heart failure acutely, and to have a longer hospital stay compared with non-DM/non-CKD patients. Between 1999 and 2009, there were marked increases in the prescribing of beta-blockers, statins, and aspirin for patients with CKD and DM as compared to those without these comorbidities. In-hospital death rates remained unchanged in patients with DM and CKD, while they declined markedly in patients with CKD without DM (20.2% dying in 1999; 11.3% dying in 2009).

Conclusion

Despite increases in the prescribing of effective cardiac medications, AMI patients with DM and CKD continue to experience high in-hospital death rates.

Observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and cardiovascular outcomes: addressing methodological limitations

BACKGROUND

Recent years have witnessed a growing body of observational literature on the association between glucose-lowering treatments and cardiovascular disease. However, many of the studies are based on designs or analyses that inadequately address the methodological challenges involved.

METHODS

We reviewed recent observational literature on the association between glucose-lowering medications and cardiovascular outcomes and assessed the design and analysis methods used, with a focus on their ability to address specific methodological challenges. We describe and illustrate these methodological issues and their impact on observed associations, providing examples from the reviewed literature. We suggest approaches that may be employed to manage these methodological challenges.

RESULTS

From the evaluation of 81 publications of observational investigations assessing the association between glucose-lowering treatments and cardiovascular outcomes, we identified the following methodological challenges: 1) handling of temporality in administrative databases; 2) handling of risks that vary with time and treatment duration; 3) definitions of the exposure risk window; 4) handling of exposures that change over time; and 5) handling of confounding by indication. Most of these methodological challenges may be suitably addressed through application of appropriate methods.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Observational research plays an increasingly important role in the evaluation of the clinical effects of diabetes treatment. Implementation of appropriate research methods holds the promise of reducing the potential for spurious findings and the risk that the spurious findings will mislead the medical community about risks and benefits of diabetes medications.

Decade-long trends in the characteristics, management and hospital outcomes of diabetic patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

PURPOSE

Our objectives were to describe recent trends in the characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in diabetic as compared with non-diabetic patients hospitalized with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 2537 persons with (n = 684) and without (n = 1853) a history of diabetes who were hospitalized for STEMI between 1997 and 2009 at 11 medical centres in Central Massachusetts.

RESULTS

Diabetic patients were more likely to be older, female and to have a higher prevalence of previously diagnosed comorbidities. Diabetic patients were more likely to have developed important in-hospital complications and to have a longer hospital stay compared with non-diabetic patients. Between 1997 and 2009, there was a marked decline in hospital mortality in diabetic (20.0%-5.6%) and non-diabetic (18.6%-7.5%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Despite reduced hospital mortality in patients hospitalized with STEMI, diabetic patients continue to experience significantly more adverse outcomes than non-diabetics.

The long-term predictive value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in Type 2 diabetic patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus have worse long-term outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) than non-diabetics. This may be related to differential contribution of neutrophil and lymphocyte to inflammation during AMI in diabetics vs. non-diabetics. We aim to determine the predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for major adverse events post-AMI in Type 2 diabetics vs. non-diabetics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 2559 consecutive patients admitted for AMI (61 ± 14 years, 73% male and 43% diabetic) were analyzed. A complete blood count was obtained and the NLR computed for each patient on admission. Across the cohort, the 1-year reinfarction rate was 8.4% (n = 214) and 1-year mortality was 14.5% (n = 370). Univariate determinants of the composite endpoint included age, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, smoking, revascularization and NLR (P < 0.001 for all). The cohort was divided into NLR quartiles. Admission NLR was significantly higher in the diabetic group, 5.2 ± 5.8 vs. 4.6 ± 5.4 (P = 0.007). A step-wise increase in the incidence of the composite endpoint was noted across NLR quartiles for diabetic subjects; hazard ratio (HR) was 2.41 for fourth vs. first quartile (95% confidence interval = 1.63-3.53, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis of the diabetic group showed that NLR remains as an independent predictor of the composite endpoint (adjusted HR = 1.53, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-2.33, P = 0.048). However, in non-diabetics, HR for NLR was not significant (P = 0.35).

CONCLUSION

Increased NLR post-AMI is an independent predictor of major adverse cardiac events in diabetics. Monitoring this easily obtainable new index allows prognostication and risk stratification.

Cardiac structure and function, remodeling, and clinical outcomes among patients with diabetes after myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, or both

AIMS

The mechanisms responsible for the increased risk of heart failure (HF) post-myocardial infarction (MI) may differ between patients with versus without diabetes. We hypothesized that after high-risk MI, patients with diabetes would demonstrate patterns of remodeling that are suggestive of reduced ventricular compliance and that are associated with an increased risk of death or HF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed quantitative echocardiographic analysis in 153 patients with diabetes and 451 patients without diabetes enrolled in the VALIANT Echo study. Diabetes was associated with a higher risk of death or HF in age-adjusted models (hazard ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.04-2.00, P = .028). Diabetic patients were similar to nondiabetic patients with respect to left ventricular (LV) volume and ejection fraction but had higher LV mass index (104.1 ± 27.5 vs 97.1 ± 28.6 g/m(2), P = .009), relative wall thickness (0.41 ± 0.08 vs 0.38 ± 0.07, P < .0001), and left atrial volume index (LAVi) (26.2 ± 8.1 vs 24.0 ± 8.2 mL/m(2), P = .008)-all parameters that were significantly related to the risk of death or HF hospitalization. Changes in LV volume and ejection fraction from baseline to 20 months were not different, although diabetic patients demonstrated greater increase in LAVi (4.4 ± 7.7 vs 2.2 ± 6.7 mL/m(2), P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

After high-risk MI, diabetic patients were at higher risk of death or HF and demonstrated greater baseline LV mass index, relative wall thickness, and LAVi as well as greater left atrial enlargement at 20-month follow-up. These findings suggest greater baseline concentric remodeling and long-term elevation in LV diastolic pressure post-MI among diabetic patients, which may partially mediate this risk.

The treatment of obesity in cardiac rehabilitation

Obesity is an independent risk factor for the development of coronary heart disease (CHD). At entry into cardiac rehabilitation (CR), more than 80% of patients are overweight and more than 50% have the metabolic syndrome. Yet, CR programs do not generally include weight loss programs as a programmatic component and weight loss outcomes in CR have been abysmal. A recently published study outlines a template for weight reduction based on a combination of behavioral weight loss counseling and an approach to exercise that maximized exercise-related caloric expenditure. This approach to exercise optimally includes walking as the primary exercise modality and eventually requires almost daily longer-distance exercise to maximize caloric expenditure. In addition, lifestyle activities such as stair climbing and avoidance of energy-saving devices should be incorporated into the daily routine. Risk factor benefits of weight loss and exercise training in overweight CHD patients are broad and compelling. Improvements in insulin resistance, lipid profiles, blood pressure, clotting abnormalities, endothelial-dependent vasodilatory capacity, and measures of inflammation such as C-reactive protein have all been demonstrated. Cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs can no longer ignore the challenge of obesity management in CHD patients. Individual programs need to develop clinically effective and culturally sensitive approaches to weight control. Finally, multicenter randomized clinical trials of weight loss in CHD patients with assessment of long-term clinical outcomes need to be performed.

The inter-relationship of diabetes and left ventricular systolic function on outcome after high-risk myocardial infarction

AIMS

Diabetes is a potent risk factor for death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization following myocardial infarction (MI). Whether diabetes modifies the relationship between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and outcomes in the post-MI population is unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The Valsartan in Acute Myocardial Infarction trial (VALIANT) enrolled 14 703 patients with acute MI complicated by HF, systolic dysfunction, or both. We compared the risk of death, HF hospitalization, and/or recurrent MI among patients with and without diabetes using Cox proportional hazards models. To assess the relationship between diabetes, LVEF and outcomes, we assessed the relative influence of baseline LVEF on outcomes in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Totally, 11 325 subjects (3095 diabetics) with site-reported LVEF and known diabetes status were included. At any given LVEF, diabetes was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.37, 95% CI 1.25-1.51], death or HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.31-1.51), and death or recurrent MI (adjusted HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.24-1.48). Diabetes modified the relationship between LVEF and death or HF hospitalization (P for interaction = 0.0109), such that the association between diabetes and increased risk was greater in magnitude at higher LVEF. No interaction was noted between diabetes and LVEF on risk of all-cause mortality or death or recurrent MI.

CONCLUSION

Diabetes is associated with a higher risk of death or HF hospitalization across the spectrum of LVEF in high-risk post-MI patients. The magnitude of reduction in risk of death or HF hospitalization associated with increasing LVEF is significantly attenuated among patients with diabetes when compared to patients without diabetes.

[The impact of diabetes mellitus on the mortality of acute coronary syndromes]

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a leading cause of mortality in the world, mainly on account of cardiovascular diseases. At present we know that not only DM but also other hyperglycemic states are a risk factor for coronary arterial disease. In the context of acute coronary syndromes, DM determines a worst prognosis, either in short- or long-term outcomes. Since the absolute risk of death is greater among diabetic patients when compared to non-diabetic patients, therapeutical interventions have a greater impact in terms of benefits to these patients as well. Strategies such as strict control of hyperglycemia during hospitalization, acute reperfusion management (either by thrombolysis or by percutaneous coronary intervention), use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors have recently proven to be of greater benefit for diabetics over non-diabetic patients. Meanwhile, in spite of all proven benefits of the use of evidence-based interventions to the treatment of acute coronary syndromes on diabetic patients, there is still an under utilization of these measures. Therefore, taking into account the predictions of an increasing number of diabetics in the world for the future years, and the fact that acute coronary syndromes will be the leading cause of death among them, it becomes increasingly necessary for both cardiologists and endocrinologists to work together in order to reduce the unfavorable outcomes that are expected to arise.

Thiazolidinedione insulin sensitizers and the heart: a tale of two organs?

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are relatively new agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. They act as agonists at the PPAR-gamma nuclear receptor and their therapeutic effects include decreased insulin resistance and hyperglycaemia, an improved plasma lipid, inflammation and pro-coagulant profile, and amelioration of hypertension, microalbuminuria and hepatic steatosis. The most common side effects of TZDs include weight gain and oedema, with occasional reports of congestive heart failure (CHF). This review discusses the benefit-risk profile of TZDs in treating patients with type 2 diabetes, with particular reference to the heart. To provide context, we explore briefly the epidemiology and pathophysiology of heart failure in patients with type 2 diabetes, touch on the association of heart disease and cardiovascular mortality with antihyperglycaemic treatment modalities other than TZDs, and then focus on the effects of TZDs on the heart, cardiovascular risk factors and outcomes. We describe the cluster of host factors, which seems to predispose patients with type 2 diabetes to TZD-induced or TZD-exacerbated oedema and CHF and then provide an overview of the putative mechanisms of these TZD-related side effects. We also propose that certain diuretics (amiloride and spironolactone), by targeting the distal nephron that expresses PPARgamma in collecting duct cells, might be of benefit in ameliorating the fluid retention and oedema associated with TZDs.

Effect of enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in diabetic patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the Enoxaparin and Thrombolysis Reperfusion for Acute Myocardial Infarction Treatment-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction study 25 (ExTRACT-TIMI 25) trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are at higher risk for complications after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) than patients without DM. Potent antithrombotic therapies may offer particular benefit for these high-risk patients and must be balanced against the potential for increased bleeding.

METHODS

We performed a prospectively planned analysis of efficacy and safety in patients with DM among 20,479 patients with STEMI treated with fibrinolysis and randomized to a strategy of enoxaparin (up to 8 days) or unfractionated heparin (UFH) (48 hours) in ExTRACT-TIMI 25.

RESULTS

Patients with DM (n = 3060) were older and more likely to be women and to present with heart failure (P < .0001 for each) than those without DM. After adjustment for the TIMI Risk Score, sex, and renal function, patients with DM were at 30% higher risk for death or myocardial infarction (MI) by 30 days (OR(adj) 1.29, 95% CI 1.14-1.46). Among patients with DM, the enoxaparin strategy reduced mortality (9.5% vs 11.8%, relative risk [RR] 0.81, 95% CI 0.66-0.99), death/MI (13.6% vs 17.1%, RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.67-0.94), and death/MI/urgent revascularization (16.0% vs 19.7%, RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.70-0.94). The enoxaparin strategy was associated with a trend toward higher major bleeding (2.6% vs 1.6%, RR 1.63, 95% CI 0.99-2.69). Taking efficacy and safety into account, the enoxaparin strategy offered superior net clinical benefit (death/MI/major bleed, 14.8% vs 18.0%, RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.97) compared with UFH in patients with DM.

CONCLUSIONS

In a subgroup analysis, a reperfusion strategy including enoxaparin significantly improved outcomes compared with UFH among high-risk STEMI patients with DM undergoing fibrinolysis.

Infarct size, ejection fraction, and mortality in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy

BACKGROUND

Diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI) have higher mortality than nondiabetic patients. The purpose of this study was to examine if larger infarct size explains the higher mortality in diabetic patients with acute ST-segment-elevation MI.

METHODS

In the CORE trial (n = 2948), subsets of patients underwent quantitative radionuclide measurement of technetium Tc 99m sestamibi infarct size (n = 1164) or gated equilibrium left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (n = 1137) at days 6 to 16 after thrombolytic therapy. Clinical follow-up was 96.7% complete at 6 months.

RESULTS

The prevalence of diabetes in these patient imaging subsets was 16% to 17%. Higher risk clinical characteristics including older age and a greater prevalence of prior MI were more common in diabetic patients. Median infarct size was larger in diabetic patients (22% vs 17% of the left ventricle, P = .04), a difference that remained significant after adjustment for clinical variables (P = .048). Patients with diabetes also had lower median LVEF (48% vs 51%, unadjusted P = .002, adjusted P = .007). Six-month mortality was higher in diabetic patients: infarct size subset, 5.9% vs 1.6% (P = .0016); LVEF subset, 6.1% vs 1.0% (P < .0001). Multivariable models demonstrated that diabetes and each imaging variable were independent predictors of mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Infarct size is modestly larger and LVEF modestly lower in diabetic patients with ST-segment-elevation MI. The substantially higher (4- to 6-fold) mortality rate in diabetic vs nondiabetic patients is only partially explained by relatively small differences in infarct size and LVEF.

Baseline glucose and left ventricular remodeling after acute myocardial infarction

In patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the mechanisms behind the increased mortality related to glucose levels (GL) are poorly understood. The main purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship between baseline glucose and left ventricular enlargement (LVE). We analyzed 52 patients with a first ST-elevation AMI <24 h of evolution. Glucose levels were obtained upon admission (median time, 3 h after the beginning of chest pain). The median GL was 123.5 mg/dl, and patients above this limit were considered hyperglycemic (n=26). Left ventricular enlargement was analyzed comparing two radionuclide ventriculographies, the first obtained within 4 days post-AMI (median, 55 h) and the second 6 months later (median, 188.5 days), taking into account the difference in the obtained end-systolic volumes. Myocardial reperfusion was evaluated comparing ST resolution between a first ECG done immediately upon hospital arrival with a second ECG performed 2 h after treatment. By univariate analysis, LVE correlated significantly with baseline hyperglycemia (P<.001), failed reperfusion by ECG criteria (P<.001), and no use of ACE inhibitors or AT1 blockers (P=.046) and aspirin (P=.046). A history of previous diabetes did not correlate significantly with LVE at 6 months. In the adjusted model, basal hyperglycemia (P<.001) and failed reperfusion (P=.001) were the only variables independently correlated with LVE. In conclusion, baseline glucose is a powerful and independent predictor of LVE after AMI, which reinforces the importance of a tight glucose control during the initial phase of the disease.

Serum cardiac markers in patients with acute myocardial infarction: oxidative stress, C-reactive protein and N-terminal probrain natriuretic Peptide

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of an oxidative stress, C-reactive protein (CRP) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) biomarkers in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The study population contained 100 patients with AMI and 40 healthy subjects. Malondialdehyde (MDA) was measured as thiobarbituric acid reactive substances. Total antioxidant status (TAC) was assayed with colorimetric method. CRP and NT-proBNP was quantitated by immunoassay. MDA, CRP and NT-proBNP levels were found significantly high in patients with AMI as compared to healthy controls (p<0.01). Patients were divided into six groups based on the presence of disease history before AMI. In patients with non-disease before AMI. MDA, CRP and NT-proBNP levels were lowest among the patient groups. MDA levels in patients with hyperlipidemia/ diabetes/renal disease were higher than the other groups. TAC levels in patients with hypertension were lower than as compared to healthy controls (p<0.05). CRP levels in hypertension + hyperlipidemia patients and NT-proBNP levels in cardiovascular + hypertension patients were found high as compared to other patient groups. It is concluded that serum levels of MDA, CRP and NT-proBNP were significantly increased in patients with AMI and these markers were strongly predictive in AMI.

Predictors of in-hospital mortality difference between male and female patients with acute myocardial infarction

Many studies have demonstrated that, compared with men, women have increased long- and short-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The reasons for this mortality difference remain in dispute. We analyzed baseline characteristics, in-hospital management, and short-term outcomes of 1,246 men and 537 women with AMI to identify clinical variables that can predict the in-hospital mortality difference between genders. A higher in-hospital mortality was found in women with AMI than in men (11.9% vs 6.9%, p <0.001). Women were generally older, had a higher incidence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, and had a higher Killip class of cardiac function compared with men. Reperfusion therapy and beta-receptor blockers were underused in women. Using a multivariate logistic regression model, we identified age, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, Killip class of cardiac function, and administration of reperfusion therapy and beta-receptor blockers as significant predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI, with odds ratios of 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] approximately 1.03 to 1.07), 1.65 (95% CI 1.12 to 2.41), 1.92 (95% CI 1.27 to 2.90), 3.62 (95% CI 2.88 to 4.56), 0.39 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.66), and 0.63 (95% CI 0.43 to 0.93), respectively. In conclusion, women with AMI had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than did men, probably due to older age, higher incidence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, a higher Killip class of cardiac function, and less utilization of reperfusion therapy and beta-receptor blockers.

Diabetes and stress hyperglycemia associated with myocardial infarctions at an urban municipal hospital: prevalence and effect on mortality

Municipal hospitals in large cities provide care for patients from immigrant and mixed ethnic communities that are at high risk for diabetes. Both diabetes and stress hyperglycemia increase the risk of adverse outcome after myocardial infarctions, and the impact of stress hyperglycemia on the outcome of myocardial infarctions in this particular setting has not been previously studied. We therefore undertook a retrospective cohort study to determine the prevalence of diabetes and stress hyperglycemia in patients presenting to a university-affiliated Bronx municipal hospital with myocardial infarction, and the relationship of these conditions to the extent of coronary disease and mortality. We obtained data on 106 consecutive patients from July 1998 to April 1999 with a diagnosis-related group diagnosis of either myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome, in which myocardial infarction was confirmed by serum enzymes or characteristic electrocardiographic changes. Patients were followed until March 30, 2001. Measurements of clinical parameters and results of catheterization were obtained for all patients. Death rates were determined by laboratory database, direct patient contact, or data from National Death Index. Eighty percent of the cohort had either a diagnosis of diabetes (n = 45, 42% of cohort) or evidence of stress hyperglycemia (defined as serum glucose greater than 126 mg/dL at the time of admission without prior diagnosis of diabetes, n = 40, 38%). In-hospital mortality for patients with diabetes, stress hyperglycemia, or normal glucose was 20%, 15%, and 14%, respectively. Eighty-three percent of the cohort received beta blockers, and 61% of hospital survivors had catheterization. Left main or triple vessel disease was common in both patients with diabetes (52%) and patients with stress hyperglycemia (32%). Mortality at follow up (maximum follow up 3 years; mean follow up 19.6 months) was much higher in patients with either diabetes (42%) or stress hyperglycemia (52%) than normal subjects (24%). Kaplan-Meier analysis of the difference in mortality between patients with high glucose on admission and normal subjects was borderline significant (P = 0.06). Multivariate regression demonstrated that age (P = 0.020), increase in admission serum creatinine (P = 0.001), and reduction in either ejection fraction (P = 0.016) or admission systolic blood pressure (P = 0.005) were significant predictors of mortality. Glycemic status and sex were not independently associated with death after controlling for these other factors. These results show that the prevalence of both diabetes and stress hyperglycemia on presentation with myocardial infarction is strikingly high in this immigrant, mixed ethnic, urban population. Patients with diabetes and stress hyperglycemia had advanced disease on presentation and much higher mortality at 2 to 3 years than those with normal blood glucose. The mortality difference is the result of older age and more advanced disease rather than hyperglycemia per se.

Comparison of efficacy of implanted cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus

In the second Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial, patients with a previous myocardial infarction and left ventricular ejection fraction < or =0.30 benefited significantly from prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) placement. Diabetic patients who had a myocardial infarction had a worse prognosis compared with nondiabetics. The present study used data from the second Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial to assess the efficacy of ICD placement on survival in diabetic patients. Of the 1,232 patients in the second Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial, 489 were characterized as diabetic. They were more likely to be New York Heart Association class II to IV, be hypertensive, have renal dysfunction, have an increased body mass index, and to take diuretic drugs. Diabetic patients had a 24% greater adjusted risk of death than nondiabetic patients. The hazard ratio (HR) for the risk of death in patients treated with the ICD compared with conventional therapy was similar in diabetics (HR 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 0.98) and nondiabetics (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.49 to 1.05), with no evidence of interaction. Thus, diabetic patients derive a similar benefit from ICD therapy despite being sicker and having a higher mortality rate overall.

Insulin-treated diabetes is associated with a marked increase in mortality in patients with advanced heart failure

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the effect of diabetes and insulin use on survival in a large cohort of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) of multiple etiologies.

BACKGROUND

Although diabetes is a well-known risk factor for both systolic and diastolic dysfunction, the impact of diabetes and insulin treatment on prognosis of patients with HF has not been well studied.

METHODS

History of diabetes and insulin treatment was assessed in 554 consecutive patients with advanced systolic HF who presented to a single center for HF management and/or transplant evaluation (mean age 52.0 +/- 13.1 years, ejection fraction 24.6 +/- 7.4). Patients were stratified into 3 groups based on presence or absence of diabetes and insulin use. Differences in patient characteristics and survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

There were 132 patients (23.8%) with diabetes; 43 patients (7.8%) were insulin treated and 89 patients (16.1%) were non-insulin-treated patients with diabetes. The groups were similar in sex, smoking history, medication profile, ejection fraction, body mass index, and serum sodium. Survival at 1 year was 89.7% for nondiabetic patients, 85.8% for non-insulin-treated diabetic patients, and 62.1% for insulin-treated diabetic patients (P < .000 01). After Cox multivariate analysis, insulin-treated diabetes was found to be an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio 4.30, 95% CI 1.69-10.94) whereas non-insulin-treated diabetes was not (hazard ratio 0.95, 95% CI 0.31-2.93). Similar findings were seen in clinically relevant subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Insulin-treated diabetes is associated with a significantly worse prognosis in patients with advanced HF. Further investigations into mechanisms for the association of insulin treatment and mortality in patients with HF are warranted.

Newly Diagnosed and Previously Known Diabetes Mellitus and 1-Year Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

A prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus is associated with adverse outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (MI), but the risk associated with a new diagnosis of diabetes in this setting has not been well defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We assessed the risk of death and major cardiovascular events associated with previously known and newly diagnosed diabetes by studying 14,703 patients with acute MI enrolled in the VALsartan In Acute myocardial iNfarcTion (VALIANT) trial. Patients were grouped by diabetic status: previously known diabetes (insulin use or diagnosis of diabetes before MI, n=3400, 23%); newly diagnosed diabetes (use of diabetic therapy or diabetes diagnosed at randomization [median 4.9 d after infarction], but no known diabetes at presentation, n=580, 4%); or no diabetes (n=10,719). Patients with newly diagnosed diabetes were younger and had fewer comorbid conditions than did patients with previously known diabetes. At 1 year after enrollment, patients with previously known and newly diagnosed diabetes had similarly increased adjusted risks of mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29 to 1.59 and HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.85, respectively) and cardiovascular events (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.48 and HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes mellitus, whether newly diagnosed or previously known, is associated with poorer long-term outcomes after MI in high-risk patients. The poor prognosis of patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, despite having baseline characteristics similar to those of patients without diabetes, supports the idea that metabolic abnormalities contribute to their adverse outcomes.

In-hospital management of type 2 diabetes mellitus

The increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes brings with it a need to understand the particular impact of hospitalization in this patient population. Type 2 diabetes has been shown to increase length of stay, infection, and mortality rates. To optimize inpatient care, it is important to understand target glycemic goals as well as in-hospital glucose monitoring and diabetes management goals. A practical review of regimens for subcutaneous insulin administration,intravenous insulin infusion, and inpatient use of oral agents is presented. Methods for achieving adequate preparation and education of the patient and family for discharge to the outpatient setting are also discussed.

Thrombolysis in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction

The efficacy of thrombolytic therapy in the elderly remains a topic of ongoing debate. Although elderly patients account for a disproportionate amount of cardiovascular mortality, they have typically been underrepresented in randomized clinical trials. A meta-analysis of these trials suggests a survival benefit, albeit small, of thrombolytic therapy in the elderly. Thrombolytic therapy, in combination with either glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors or low-molecular weight heparin, poses an increased hazard in the elderly. Observational studies of thrombolytic therapy in the elderly portray a far worse outcome than the randomized clinical trials and raise the possibility of increased mortality. To date, no randomized trial has compared thrombolytic and primary coronary intervention in the elderly. However, multiple observational studies indicate a low risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and improved survival when a strategy of primary coronary intervention is employed. Future trials and observational studies should elucidate the ideal reperfusion strategy in the elderly.

Beta-blockers after acute myocardial infarction in elderly patients with diabetes mellitus: time to reassess

Beta-blockers effectively reduce mortality and recurrent cardiovascular events in patients surviving myocardial infarction. However, these agents are underused in clinical practice, especially in older patients with diabetes mellitus. The current literature shows that beta-blockers are at least as effective in older diabetic patients as in other patients, without major safety concerns for their possible adverse effects. The use of these agents in clinical practice should therefore be encouraged, in order to reduce the burden of cardiovascular mortality and morbidity in older diabetic patients post-infarction.

C-reactive protein in acute myocardial infarction: association with heart failure

BACKGROUND

High C-reactive protein (CRP) levels have been associated with higher mortality rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, it is not known whether inflammation plays a role in the time-course of heart failure (HF) in this clinical setting. Our aim was to study the nature of the relationship between CRP and HF during AMI.

METHODS

This prospective study was carried out in 269 subjects admitted to the hospital for suspected AMI. Of these, 220 had evidence of AMI. The other 49 subjects were studied as controls. CRP was assessed on the first, third, and seventh day after admission.

RESULTS

CRP was significantly higher in the patients with AMI than in the control patients (P =.001) and peaked on the third day. Among the patients with AMI, CRP was higher in patients with HF than in patients without HF (adjusted P =.008, P =.02 and P =.03 on 1st, 3rd, and 7th day, respectively). Prevalence of HF on admission was slightly higher in the subjects with first-day CRP >or=15 mg/L than in those with CRP <15 mg/L, and the between-group difference progressively increased from the first to the seventh day (P <.0001). At multivariable regression analysis, first-day log-CRP was shown to be a strong independent predictor of both HF progression (P <.0001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (P <.0001). One-year total mortality and HF-mortality rates turned out to be higher in the patients with CRP >or=85 mg/L than in those with CRP below that level (P <.0001), and log-third-day CRP was independently associated with 1-year mortality at multivariable analysis (P =.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

CRP on admission to hospital is suitable for predicting the time-course of HF in patients with AMI. Peak CRP value is a strong independent predictor of global and HF-mortality during the following year.

Cardiac Outcomes After Myocardial Infarction in Elderly Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

• Objective To examine the association between (1) comorbid conditions related to diabetes mellitus, clinical findings on arrival at the hospital, and characteristics of the myocardial infarction and (2) risk of heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, and mortality in the year after myocardial infarction in elderly 30-day survivors of myocardial infarction who had non–insulin- or insulin-treated diabetes.

• Methods Medical records for June 1, 1992, through February 28, 1993, of Medicare beneficiaries (n = 1698), 65 years or older, hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction in Connecticut were reviewed by trained abstractors.

• Results One year after myocardial infarction, elderly patients with non–insulin- and insulin-treated diabetes mellitus had significantly greater risk for readmission for heart failure and recurrent myocardial infarction than did patients without diabetes mellitus, and risk was greater in patients treated with insulin than in patients not treated with insulin. Diabetes mellitus, comorbid conditions related to diabetes mellitus, clinical findings on arrival, and characteristics of the myocardial infarction, specifically measures of ventricular function, were important predictors of these outcomes. Mortality was greater in patients not treated with insulin than in patients treated with insulin; the increased risk was mostly due to comorbid conditions related to diabetes mellitus and poorer ventricular function.

• Conclusions Risk of heart failure, recurrent myocardial infarction, and mortality is elevated in elderly patients who have non–insulin- or insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Comorbid conditions related to diabetes mellitus and ventricular function at the time of the index myocardial infarction are important contributors to poorer outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Acute myocardial infarction in the elderly with diabetes

OBJECTIVE

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been associated with an elevated, short-term risk of death after myocardial infarction (MI). Among the studies of DM, however, few studies have included elderly subjects. The purpose of the present investigation was to determine if non-insulin-treated DM (NIRxDM) and insulin-treated DM (IRxDM) were associated with specific comorbid conditions, clinical findings on arrival, and MI characteristics, as well as a higher 30-day mortality rate in elderly patients with acute MI.

DESIGN

The study design was a retrospective medical record review and secondary data analysis of previously collected data from the Cooperative Cardiovascular Project.

SETTING

Study setting was Connecticut from June 1, 1992, through February 28, 1993.

PATIENTS

Subjects included the entire Medicare population (n = 2050), aged 65 years or older who were hospitalized for acute MI.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality rate at 30 days after MI was measured.

RESULTS

A history of DM was observed in 29% of the study population. DM status was associated with previous comorbid conditions, poorer functional status, higher body mass index, heart failure on arrival, non-Q-wave MI, and development of atrial fibrillation and oliguria during hospitalization. Patients with DM were less likely to have chest pain on arrival to the hospital. Diabetic status was not a significant predictor of short-term mortality; at 30 days after MI, 17% (n = 242) of the subjects without DM, 19% (n = 71) of those with NIRxDM, and 18% (n = 39) of the subjects with IRxDM died (P = .460). After adjustment for other prognostic factors, it was noted that MI characteristics present on hospital arrival predicted mortality at 30 days in both patients with NIRxDM and patients with IRxDM.

CONCLUSIONS

The slightly, but not significantly, increased mortality risk in patients with DM should not minimize the importance of monitoring DM in the acute MI setting. Hospitalization for MI provides an opportunity to provide aggressive lipid and blood pressure management, optimize blood glucose, control heart failure, and institute other secondary preventive interventions in the elderly population with DM.

Impact of diabetes on long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction: comparability of risk with prior myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of diabetes on long-term survival after acute myocardial infarction and to compare its effect with that of a previous myocardial infarction.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In a prospective cohort study, we followed 1,935 patients hospitalized with a confirmed acute myocardial infarction at 45 U.S. medical centers between 1989 and 1993, as part of the Determinants of Myocardial Infarction Onset Study. Trained interviewers performed chart reviews and face-to-face interviews with all patients. We analyzed survival using Cox proportional hazards regression to control for potentially confounding factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1,935 patients, 320 (17%) died during a mean follow-up of 3.7 years. A total of 399 patients (21%) had previously diagnosed diabetes. Diabetes was associated with markedly higher total mortality in unadjusted (hazard ratio [HR] 2.4; 95% CI 1.9-3.0) and adjusted (1.7; 1.3-2.1) analyses. The magnitude of the effect of diabetes was identical to that of a previous myocardial infarction. The effect of diabetes was not significantly modified by age, smoking, household income, use of thrombolytic therapy, type of hypoglycemic treatment, or duration of diabetes, but the risk associated with diabetes was higher among women than men (adjusted HRs 2.7 vs. 1.3, P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Diabetes is associated with markedly increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction, particularly in women. The increase in risk is of the same magnitude as a previous myocardial infarction and provides further support for aggressive treatment of coronary risk factors among diabetic patients.