Association of C-reactive protein and serum amyloid A with recurrent coronary events in stable patients after healing of acute myocardial infarction

Endothelial Dysfunction, Inflammation and Coronary Artery Disease: Potential Biomarkers and Promising Therapeutical Approaches

Coronary artery disease (CAD) and its complications are the leading cause of death worldwide. Inflammatory activation and dysfunction of the endothelium are key events in the development and pathophysiology of atherosclerosis and are associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular events. There is great interest to further understand the pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying endothelial dysfunction and atherosclerosis progression, and to identify novel biomarkers and therapeutic strategies to prevent endothelial dysfunction, atherosclerosis and to reduce the risk of developing CAD and its complications. The use of liquid biopsies and new molecular biology techniques have allowed the identification of a growing list of molecular and cellular markers of endothelial dysfunction, which have provided insight on the molecular basis of atherosclerosis and are potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for the prevention and or treatment of atherosclerosis and CAD. This review describes recent information on normal vascular endothelium function, as well as traditional and novel potential biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction and inflammation, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapeutic strategies aimed to protect the endothelium or reverse endothelial damage, as a preventive treatment for CAD and related complications.

Growth-differentiation factor-15 predicts adverse cardiac events in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to analyse the association between high-level growth-differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) and mortality, recurrent MI and heart failure compared to low-level GDF-15 in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched from their commencement to December 2017 for qualified studies that evaluated the associations between GDF-15 and ACS. Risk ratios were synthesized with random effect meta-analysis. Publication bias and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.

RESULTS

A total of thirteen studies and 43,547 participants were analyzed systematically in our meta-analysis. Our study showed a significant association between GDF-15 values and mortality (p = 0.000, RR = 6.75, 95% CI = 5.81-7.84) and recurrent MI (p = 0.000, RR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.72-2.21) in the overall analyses. Subgroup analyses revealed similar results. However, there was evidence of heterogeneity in the study of heart failure, whose overall RR was 6.66, with an I² of 87.3%.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant association between high-level GDF-15 and mortality, recurrent MI in patients with ACS. We need more data to research the risk stratification of heart failure in ACS patients in the future.

Using nationwide ‘big data’ from linked electronic health records to help improve outcomes in cardiovascular diseases: 33 studies using methods from epidemiology, informatics, economics and social science in the ClinicAl disease research using LInked Bespoke studies and Electronic health Records (CALIBER) programme

Background

Electronic health records (EHRs), when linked across primary and secondary care and curated for research use, have the potential to improve our understanding of care quality and outcomes.

Objective

To evaluate new opportunities arising from linked EHRs for improving quality of care and outcomes for patients at risk of or with coronary disease across the patient journey.

Design

Epidemiological cohort, health informatics, health economics and ethnographic approaches were used.

Setting

230 NHS hospitals and 226 general practices in England and Wales.

Participants

Up to 2 million initially healthy adults, 100,000 people with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) and up to 300,000 patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Main outcome measures

Quality of care, fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular disease (CVD) events.

Data platform and methods

We created a novel research platform [ClinicAl disease research using LInked Bespoke studies and Electronic health Records (CALIBER)] based on linkage of four major sources of EHR data in primary care and national registries. We carried out 33 complementary studies within the CALIBER framework. We developed a web-based clinical decision support system (CDSS) in hospital chest pain clinics. We established a novel consented prognostic clinical cohort of SCAD patients.

Results

CALIBER was successfully established as a valid research platform based on linked EHR data in nearly 2 million adults with > 600 EHR phenotypes implemented on the web portal (seehttps://caliberresearch.org/portal). Despite national guidance, key opportunities for investigation and treatment were missed across the patient journey, resulting in a worse prognosis for patients in the UK compared with patients in health systems in other countries. Our novel, contemporary, high-resolution studies showed heterogeneous associations for CVD risk factors across CVDs. The CDSS did not alter the decision-making behaviour of clinicians in chest pain clinics. Prognostic models using real-world data validly discriminated risk of death and events, and were used in cost-effectiveness decision models.

Conclusions

Emerging ‘big data’ opportunities arising from the linkage of records at different stages of a patient’s journey are vital to the generation of actionable insights into the diagnosis, risk stratification and cost-effective treatment of people at risk of, or with, CVD.

Future work

The vast majority of NHS data remain inaccessible to research and this hampers efforts to improve efficiency and quality of care and to drive innovation. We propose three priority directions for further research. First, there is an urgent need to ‘unlock’ more detailed data within hospitals for the scale of the UK’s 65 million population. Second, there is a need for scaled approaches to using EHRs to design and carry out trials, and interpret the implementation of trial results. Third, large-scale, disease agnostic genetic and biological collections linked to such EHRs are required in order to deliver precision medicine and to innovate discovery.

Study registration

CALIBER studies are registered as follows: study 2 – NCT01569139, study 4 – NCT02176174 and NCT01164371, study 5 – NCT01163513, studies 6 and 7 – NCT01804439, study 8 – NCT02285322, and studies 26–29 – NCT01162187. Optimising the Management of Angina is registered as Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN54381840.

Funding

The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Programme Grants for Applied Research programme (RP-PG-0407-10314) (all 33 studies) and additional funding from the Wellcome Trust (study 1), Medical Research Council Partnership grant (study 3), Servier (study 16), NIHR Research Methods Fellowship funding (study 19) and NIHR Research for Patient Benefit (study 33).

The Relationship among N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide, High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Infarct Size in Patients with Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background and Objectives

We sought to investigate the relationship between levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and the infarct size and left ventricular (LV) volume after acute myocardial infarction (MI).

Subjects and Methods

Eighty-six patients with acute ST-elevation MI underwent delayed enhancement multidetector computed tomography immediately after they underwent percutaneous coronary intervention to determine the infarct size. LV function and remodeling were assessed by echocardiography. Hs-CRP and NT-proBNP were measured at admission, 24 hours and two months later.

Results

Both hs-CRP and NT-proBNP at 24 hours showed a positive correlation with infarct size and a negative correlation with LV ejection fraction at the baseline and two months later. NT-proBNP at two months correlated with infarct size, LV ejection fraction, and LV end diastolic and systolic volume indices at two months. In patients with high NT-proBNP levels at 24 hours and two months, infarct size was larger and LV ejection fraction was lower. NT-proBNP was higher in patients who developed LV remodeling at two months: 929 pg/mL vs. 134 pg/mL, p=0.002. In contrast, hs-CRP at two months showed no relationship to infarct size, LV function, or LV volumes at two months.

Conclusion

Elevated hs-CRP level 24 hours after the onset of acute MI is associated with infarct size and LV dysfunction, whereas elevated levels of NT-proBNP 24 hours and two months after the onset of acute MI are both correlated with infarct size, LV dysfunction, and LV remodeling.

Identification of protein biomarkers associated with cardiac ischemia by a proteomic approach

Angina is chest pain induced by ischemia of the heart muscle, generally due to obstruction or spasm of the coronary arteries. People that suffer from average to severe cases of angina have an increased percentage of death before the age of 55, usually around 60%. Therefore, prevention of major complications, optimizing diagnosis, prognosis and therapeutics are of primary importance. The main objective of this study was to uncover biomarkers by comparing serum protein profiles of patients suffering from stable or unstable angina and controls. We identified by non-targeted proteomic approach and confirmed by the means of independent techniques, the differential expression of several proteins indicating significantly increased vascular inflammation response, disturbance in the lipid metabolism and in atherogenic plaques stability.

Prognostic markers in young patients with premature coronary heart disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the survival and prognostic implications of cardiovascular, inflammatory and prothrombotic risk factors in young patients with premature coronary heart disease (CHD).

METHODS

Follow-up data were obtained from 353 young patients with a first cardiac event (men ≤45 years and women ≤55 years). Baseline characteristics on traditional risk factors were collected at the time of the first event, and plasma levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), von Willebrand Factor (VWF), and fibrinogen were measured one to three months after the first event to exclude an acute phase response. We performed age and sex adjusted Cox regression analyses to assess the relationship between these factors and recurrent events with three different endpoints: all cause mortality, recurrent cardiac event (myocardial infarction or revascularisation procedure), and any recurrent event (cardiac event, cerebrovascular event or all cause mortality).

RESULTS

During a total follow-up time of 1483 person years (mean 4.2 years), 11 patients died (3%), 42 patients had a recurrent cardiac event (12%), and 53 patients had any recurrent event (15%). CRP was associated with an increased risk of any recurrent event (HR 1.28[95% CI = 1.02-1.59] per unit increase in lnCRP). Also, both CRP (5.00[1.04-24.04]) and fibrinogen (5.04[1.05-24.23]) were associated with all cause mortality when levels were above the 50th percentile.

CONCLUSIONS

Fifteen percent of young patients with a first cardiac event have a recurrent event or die within a median follow-up of 4.2 years. In these young patients we have shown that, independently of cardiovascular risk factors, high CRP levels contribute to the risk of recurrent events, including all cause mortality, and high fibrinogen levels are associated with all cause mortality.

Inflammatory biomarkers and coronary heart disease: from bench to bedside and back

Inflammation plays a pivotal role in all stages of atherosclerosis from endothelial dysfunction and plaque formation to plaque destabilization and disruption. Inflammatory biomarkers, originally studied to better understand the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, have generated increasing interest among clinicians, because of their utility in the challenging problems of diagnosis and risk assessment of patients with suspected or proved coronary heart disease. Moreover, in fascinating perspective, they could be used as therapeutic target, counteracting initiation, progression, and development of complications of atherosclerosis. In this review, we will provide an overview of the more promising inflammatory biomarkers, focusing on their utility and limitations in the clinical setting.

Growth-Differentiation Factor-15 for Long-Term Risk Prediction in Patients Stabilized After an Episode of Non–ST-Segment–Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Background— Growth-differentiation factor-15 (GDF-15) has emerged as a prognostic biomarker in patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome. This study assessed the time course and the long-term prognostic relevance of GDF-15 levels measured repetitively in patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome during 6 months after the acute event.

Methods and Results— GDF-15 and other biomarkers were measured at randomization, after 6 weeks, and after 3 and 6 months in 950 patients with non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome included in the FRagmin and Fast Revascularization during InStability in Coronary artery disease II study. Study end points were death, recurrent myocardial infarction, and their composite during 5-year follow-up. Median GDF-15 levels decreased slightly from 1357 ng/L at randomization to 1302 ng/L at 6 months ( P <0.001). GDF-15 was consistently related to cardiovascular risk factors and biochemical markers of hemodynamic stress, renal dysfunction, and inflammation. Moreover, GDF-15 was independently related to the 5-year risk of the composite end point when measured at both 3 months (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.8 [1.0 to 3.0]) and 6 months (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.3 [1.3 to 4.1]). Serial measurements of GDF-15 at randomization and 6 months helped to identify patient cohorts at different levels of risk, with patients with persistently elevated GDF-15 levels >1800 ng/L having the highest rate of the composite end point.

Conclusions— GDF-15 is independently related to adverse events in non–ST-segment–elevation acute coronary syndrome both in the acute setting and for at least 6 months after clinical stabilization. Therefore, continued research on GDF-15 should be focused on the usefulness of GDF-15 for support of clinical management in acute and chronic ischemic heart disease.

C-reactive protein: the harbinger of cardiovascular diseases

Coronary heart disease remains the major cause of mortality and morbidity in the United States and other western countries despite major advances in its treatment. During the last decades, many markers of coronary artery disease have been found which help predict future risk of cardiovascular events. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein has been studied extensively and was seen to be associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients with acute coronary syndromes and/or peripheral artery disease. Discussed in this review is the latest literature about this marker and its association with cardiovascular disease, as well as the latest therapeutic options available.

Elevated serum neopterin levels and adverse cardiac events at 6 months follow-up in Mediterranean patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

BACKGROUND

Little information exists regarding the prognostic role of biomarkers of inflammation in Mediterranean patients. High C-reactive protein and neopterin levels - a marker of macrophage activation - predict cardiovascular events in stable angina patients and patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to assess whether plasma neopterin levels predict adverse clinical outcomes in Mediterranean patients with non-ST elevation (NSTE) ACS, i.e. unstable angina (UA) and NSTE myocardial infarction (MI).

METHODS

We prospectively assessed 397 patients (74% men) admitted with NSTEACS, 147 (37%) had unstable angina and 250 (63%) NSTEMI. Blood samples for neopterin and CRP assessment were obtained at admission. The study endpoint was the composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina at 180 days.

RESULTS

Baseline neopterin concentrations (nmol/L) were similar in unstable angina and NSTEMI patients (8.3 [6.6-10.7] vs. 7.9 [6.2-10.9]; p=0.4). Fifty-nine patients (14.9%) had events during follow-up. Twenty-nine (21.5%) patients with neopterin levels in the highest third experienced the combined endpoint, compared to 30 (11.5%) patients with neopterin levels in the second and the lowest thirds (log-rank 7.435, p=0.024). On multivariable hazard Cox regression, neopterin (highest vs. 1st and 2nd thirds, HR 1.762, 95% CI [1.023-3.036]) was independently associated with the combined endpoint.

CONCLUSION

Increased neopterin levels are an independent predictor of 180-day adverse cardiac events in Mediterranean patients with NSTEACS.

Fetuin-A Is an Independent Predictor of Death after ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Background: Fetuin-A inhibits inflammation and has a protective effect against myocardial ischemia. Its deficiency has been found to be associated with cardiovascular death in patients with end-stage renal failure disease. We investigated the association between plasma fetuin-A and clinical outcome after ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods: We measured fetuin-A in 284 consecutive patients with STEMI and correlated these data with the occurrence of death at 6 months (n = 25). We also measured fetuin-A in a control group and chose the 95th percentile as the cutoff to define abnormality.

Results: Patient mean (SD) age was 60 (14) years, and creatinine clearance was 83 (31) mL/min; 82% were men. Mean (SD) plasma fetuin-A concentrations at admission [188 (69) mg/L, P = 0.01] and at day 3 [163 (57) mg/L, P &lt;0.0001] were lower in patients than in controls [219 (39) mg/L; 95th percentile 140 mg/L]. Fetuin-A &lt;140 mg/L was observed in 20% of patients at admission vs 40% at day 3 (P &lt;0.001). Fetuin-A concentrations did not correlate with peak cardiac troponin values but did correlate inversely with C-reactive protein (CRP) and NT-pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Fetuin-A &lt;140 mg/L at admission (OR = 3.3, P = 0.03) and at day 3 (OR = 6.3, P = 0.002) was an independent correlate of death at 6 months, irrespective of NT-proBNP, CRP, or Controlled Abciximab and Device Investigation to Lower Late Angioplasty Complications (CADILLAC) risk score. Conversely, fetuin-A ≥140 mg/L was associated with an excellent survival rate [negative predictive value (NPV) = 97% overall], even in high-risk populations with CADILLAC risk score ≥6 (NPV = 90% in patients).

Conclusions: Fetuin-A is an important predictor of death at 6 months in STEMI patients independent of NT-proBNP, CRP, and CADILLAC risk score.

Prognostic role of post-infarction C-reactive protein in patients undergoing implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators: design of the C-reactive protein Assessment after Myocardial Infarction to GUide Implantation of DEfibrillator (CAMI GUIDE) study

BACKGROUND

Patients at risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) after myocardial infarction (MI) can currently be offered effective means of prevention, such as implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD). However, predictors of SCD able to identify those patients who are at higher risk are still lacking. Whether C-reactive protein (CRP), a serum inflammatory marker with established prognostic accuracy after MI, can also be a predictor of SCD is unclear.

METHODS

The CAMI GUIDE study is designed to evaluate the prognostic role of CRP in patients undergoing ICD implantation after MI according to MADIT II criteria (i.e. left ventricular ejection fraction<or=30%). CAMI GUIDE is a prospective observational study aimed at assessing the role of CRP in the risk-stratification of SCD after MI. CRP will be measured on the basis of a pre-specified cut-off value of 3 mg/l, before and 1 month after ICD implantation; clinical follow-up will last 24 months. The primary endpoint is the combined rate of SCD or fast ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation. Secondary endpoints will be total mortality, death due to acute coronary syndromes, death from pump failure, non-fatal MI, coronary revascularization, hospitalization for congestive heart failure or unstable angina and inappropriate ICD shocks. Twenty-four Italian centers will participate in enrollment of the 290 patients planned according to power analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAMI GUIDE study will assess the predictive role of CRP in SCD in patients with previous MI undergoing ICD implantation. Its results will improve risk stratification, thereby enabling better-tailored and more cost-effective therapies to be undertaken in those patients whose need is greatest.

Biochemical and bioimaging markers for risk assessment and diagnosis in major cardiovascular diseases: a road to integration of complementary diagnostic tools

This report from the first International Course on Integrated Biomarkers, Biochemical and Bioimaging Endpoints in Cardiovascular Diagnosis, Prevention, Therapy and Drug Development provides the basis for optimizing diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic information in four areas of cardiovascular medicine: primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases, acute coronary syndromes, heart failure and stroke. Risk stratification and treatment strategies can be refined and enhanced through integration of bioimaging and biochemical markers to characterize sub-clinical and clinical atherosclerosis. For the integrative approach to be useful, each of the biomarkers must be validated and cost-effective. Clinical decision is the primary level of integration and is based on clinical evaluation and the use of a combination of bioimaging and biochemical markers. The decision to initiate preventive or therapeutic intervention must take into account the factors affecting the levels of expression of the biomarker and the potential input the biomarker has on metabolic processes or modulation of other biomarkers. The optimal approach to intervention must take into consideration the risk-benefit and cost-effectiveness ratios.

Predischarge C-reactive protein and 1-year outcome after acute coronary syndromes

PURPOSE

To investigate the relationship between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cardiovascular events following acute coronary syndrome.

METHODS

This nationwide, cross-sectional, prospective study involved 439 patients with an acute coronary syndrome who presented to the hospital within 24 hours of symptom onset. Patients with a concomitant inflammatory process were excluded. Predischarge C-reactive protein samples were measured using a high-sensitivity method in a core laboratory. The outcome was the composite of death, acute myocardial infarction, stroke/transient ischemic attack, urgent hospitalization for unstable angina, and urgent revascularization within 1 year.

RESULTS

At 1 year, event rates were 10.2% for the lowest, 8.2% for the middle, and 11.0% for the highest C-reactive protein tertiles (P = .75) with similar event-free survival (P = .70). The hazard ratio (HR) for event rates between the highest and lowest tertiles was 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54 to 2.20) There was marked overlap of C-reactive protein values between patients with and without events (median [interquartile range]: 8.39 [3.27 to 32.63] vs 9.55 [4.07 to 24.02], respectively; P = .91). C-reactive protein was not an independent predictor of 1-year events (HR for highest tertile: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.58 to 2.43; P = .64) and performed poorly on receiver operating characteristic curve analysis (C statistic = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

Predischarge high-sensitivity C-reactive protein level is a poor predictor of cardiovascular events at 1 year after acute coronary syndrome.

Predictive Value of C-Reactive Protein and Left Ventricular Diastolic Filling Pattern after a Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

BACKGROUND

Recent studies have shown that the odds ratio for high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting a coronary events in healthy subjects is 1.4, a value substantially less than previously reported. It is unclear whether this extends to acute coronary syndrome patients or if CRP would predict long-term events in this population. We evaluated the predictive value of CRP in patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) as their first manifestation of coronary artery disease and compared it with that of left ventricle diastolic function.

METHODS

Serum CRP concentration measurement and left ventricle diastolic function evaluation were performed in 51 consecutive patients with NSTEMI 48 hours, 3 months, and 6 months after infarction. Patients were followed for 1 year and events comprising the endpoints of death, new myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting were reported.

RESULTS

Thirty of 51 patients developed the endpoints. Mean CRP concentration in patients who developed any endpoint and those who did not was similar at 48 hours, 3 months, and 6 months. A strong correlation between the presence of impaired relaxation 6 months after the infarction and development of the combined endpoints was noted (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

CRP has limited value in predicting future cardiovascular events in subjects with NSTEMI. Other biomarkers or a combination of other biomarkers may be needed to identify patients at high risk. Evaluation of diastolic left ventricular function not during the acute phase but 6 months later could predict adverse outcome in our series.

C-reactive protein in patients with acute coronary syndrome: correlation with diagnosis, myocardial damage, ejection fraction and angiographic findings

BACKGROUND

C-reactive protein (CRP) plasmatic levels increase in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Correlations between CRP levels, myocardial functional damage and cardiomyocyte lysis remain to be defined.

METHODS

192 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes (64.97 +/- 11.08 mean age, 71.35% male gender) were included in the study; 138 patients (71.87%) were discharged with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) diagnosis (28 with non Q-wave AMI) and 54 with an unstable angina (UA) diagnosis (28.13%). In all patients CRP, CK, LDH, CK-MB and troponin I plasmatic concentrations were evaluated every 6 h for 48 h and every 24 h for the following 2 days from the onset of symptoms. Ejection fraction was estimated by bidimensional echocardiography and extension of myocardial lysis by cardiac enzymes plasmatic release. 92 patients (67 with AMI, 25 with UA) underwent coronary-angiography. Incidence of adverse cardiac events was recorded in a 6 months follow up.

RESULTS

Mean CRP levels in Q-wave MI showed a statistically significant increase in the different blood samples with baseline. Mean CRP levels of the three groups were not statistically different at baseline and after 6, 12, and 18 h. Q-wave AMI CRP levels showed a statistically significant difference as against non Q-wave AMI at 36 (p < 0.05), 48 (p < 0.05) and 72 h (p < 0.05) and UA at 24 (p < 0.01), 30 (p < 0.01), 48 (p < 0.0001), 72 (p = 0.0001) and 96 h (p = 0.0003); non Q-wave AMI CPR levels showed a statistically significant difference as against UA at 48 h (p < 0.01). CRP peak mean levels were significantly different when comparing Q-wave AMI patients with UA patients (8.21 +/- 7.85 vs. 2.75 +/- 3.33 mg/dl, p < 0.001). In patients with Q-wave AMI there was a correlation between CRP peak concentrations and CK (r = 0.264, p = 0.008) and LDH (r = 0.32, p = 0.001), while correlation with CK-MB peak concentrations was not statistically significant (r = 0.196, p = 0.051). In the same patient group, there was also a correlation between CRP plasmatic concentrations and troponin I plasmatic concentrations from the 30th to 96th h after the onset of symptoms (r = 0.38-0.53, p < 0.05). No correlation was found between CRP levels and ejection fraction and angio-coronarography findings (number of stenotic vessels, culprit lesions, ruptured plaques). Peak CRP levels were associated in a 6 months follow up with an increased incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in patients with Q-wave AMI (HR 1.1649, 95% C.I. 1.0197-1.3307, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

CRP plasmatic concentrations showed a different release curve in patients with Q-wave AMI in comparison with patients with non Q-wave AMI and with patients with UA. CRP peak concentrations did not correlate with ejection fraction and angiographic findings, but correlate with incidence of MACE. The increase in CRP levels during Q-wave MI seems to be linked to the extension of myocardial damage rather than pre-existing inflammation.

Predicting risk and treatment benefit in atherosclerosis: the role of C-reactive protein

Inflammatory mechanisms play a prominent role in mediating all stages of atherosclerosis, and measurement of inflammatory biomarkers provides a method for detecting individuals at future vascular risk. Evidence from observational studies indicates that the hepatic acute-phase reactant, C-reactive protein (CRP), is the strongest predictor of future myocardial infarction and stroke. The addition of CRP to standard lipid screening may improve global risk prediction among those with high as well as low cholesterol. Statins have been shown to have beneficial effects on plaque inflammation, stability and CRP levels, in addition to their lipid-lowering effects. Data from two large statin trials suggest that testing for CRP may identify many individuals without hyperlipidaemia who are at high risk for future cardiovascular events and who may benefit from statin therapy. If confirmed in ongoing large-scale prospective trials, screening for inflammation using CRP as a biomarker could prove an important adjunctive method for identifying individuals at increased risk who would benefit most from targeted preventive interventions.

Statins and the response to myocardial injury

The benefits of long-term statin (HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor) treatment for preventing coronary events have been well documented in several large-scale prospective clinical trials. By influencing the determinants of myocardial injury, statins may produce direct cardioprotective effects in the ischemic myocardium and prevent further damaging recurrent events. Although not proven fully in a clinical setting, cholesterol-independent or 'pleiotropic' effects of statins are thought to protect against myocardial injury and may occur via a number of mechanisms. Endothelial dysfunction occurs early in the development of atherosclerosis and is associated with a reduction in endothelial nitric oxide (NO) production. Statins have been shown to increase the expression of endothelial NO synthase, with subsequent augmentation of NO in the vasculature. Statins have also been reported to have anti-inflammatory effects, reducing the release of cytokines and chemokines, decreasing the expression of pro-inflammatory cell adhesion molecules, and reducing the accumulation of neutrophils in myocardial tissue following ischemia and reperfusion. Indeed, the role of statins in reducing infarct size is supported by data from a number of preclinical studies. Statin treatment, administered at the onset of reperfusion, has been shown to reduce infarct size by approximately 50% following ischemia in various animal models, and this may be an NO-dependent effect. Randomized clinical trials have indicated that early initiation of statin treatment is associated with a reduction in both the rate of recurrence of cardiovascular events and death in patients with acute coronary syndrome. In addition, decreased rates of myocardial infarction and mortality were demonstrated in several retrospective studies where statin treatment was administered before an interventional procedure. There is a need for further clinical trials to fully elucidate the importance of pre-procedural statin therapy and to determine the extent and mechanisms by which statins exert their cardioprotective effects.

CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease

Inflammation is a recognized key component of acute coronary syndromes. Such pathogenetic achievement has led to the use of inflammatory cells and proteins as prognostic markers in these syndromes. A number of markers have been proposed, including proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6, interleukin-1RA, and tumor necrosis factor-α, adhesion molecules such as intracellular adhesion molecule-1 and vascular adhesion molecule-1 and markers of cell activation. Although all are of scientific interest, the clinical use of these markers is limited by their high cost, low availability, and unfavorable biological profile. Conversely, common markers of inflammation such as C-reactive protein (CRP), the prototypic acute phase protein, and to a lesser extent fibrinogen, have been proven to be reliable and important markers of risk in ischemic heart disease. CRP, in particular, has been found to be associated with short- and long-term prognosis in acute coronary syndromes, including ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and in stable angina, and to predict the risk of restenosis and major events, including death, after revascularization procedures. CRP has been consistently found to be independent from other risk factors and to have an incremental value beyond the common risk factors and biochemical markers of risk, including troponin. Whether CRP also should be used as a guide to therapy is still a matter of discussion that deserves further, properly designed studies.

C-reactive protein: a novel marker of cardiovascular risk

Patients without traditional cardiovascular risk factors continue to suffer from cardiovascular events, which has prompted a search for novel markers to better assess cardiovascular risk. Inflammatory biomarkers have surfaced as prime candidates, given the integral role of inflammation in atherosclerosis. C-reactive protein (CRP) measurements in particular have emerged as powerful predictors of cardiovascular risk in a broad spectrum of patient populations. Newer high sensitivity CRP assays now in use are standardized and reproducible, and can detect variations in CRP below the limit of standard assays. In primary prevention populations, studies have shown up to a 2-4-fold increased risk of cardiovascular events in healthy patients with elevated CRP levels. In this population, models incorporating CRP and lipid parameters appear to predict risk significantly better than lipids alone. In patients with established cardiovascular disease and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions, CRP levels may help predict short- and long-term prognosis, identifying subgroups of patients at increased risk of recurrent events. CRP levels may also prove useful in targeting therapy for primary and secondary prevention, by identifying patients who would most benefit from medications such as statins and aspirin. This review presents an overview of the data regarding CRP measurement for cardiovascular risk assessment.

Endothelial dysfunction and inflammation: what is the link?

Cardiovascular disease, resulting from arteriosclerotic remodeling of the vasculature, is the main cause of death in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Early during the course of arteriosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction can be detected in various vascular beds, including peripheral forearm arteries, as well as the coronary circulation. Furthermore, endothelial dysfunction seems to predict the prognosis of cardiovascular disease. Therefore, the question deserves attention whether endothelial dysfunction is simply a marker of cardiovascular disease, or an active player in the progress of the disease. A possible link between arteriosclerosis, endothelial dysfunction, and cardiovascular disease is increased oxidative stress. Inflammatory processes involved in the pathogenesis of arteriosclerosis enhance vascular O2- formation, leading to endothelial dysfunction. An activated renin angiotensin system, together with oxidized low-density lipoprotein, may play a prominent role for enhanced vascular oxidative stress. In this context, the endothelium is not only a target of oxygen radicals, but may also contribute to O2- formation. It is the aim of this article to highlight the interplay of inflammation, endothelial dysfunction, and oxidative stress.

Inflammatory bio-markers and cardiovascular risk prediction

Inflammatory processes are now recognized to play a central role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and its complications. Plasma levels of several markers of inflammation have been found to be associated with future cardiovascular risk in a variety of clinical settings. These markers include cell adhesion molecules, cytokines, pro-atherogenic enzymes and C-reactive protein (CRP). Initially thought of as an inactive downstream marker of the inflammatory cascade, emerging evidence suggests that CRP may be directly involved in atherogenesis, and that arterial plaque can produce CRP, independent of traditional hepatic pathways. In addition to being a strong predictor of future cardiovascular risk amongst patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes, numerous studies have found that baseline levels of CRP are associated with risk of future myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral vascular disease and cardiovascular death amongst apparently healthy populations. The combination of measurement of a marker of inflammation with lipid testing may improve upon risk stratification based on lipid testing alone, and intensification of programmes for exercise, weight loss, and smoking cessation is recommended for those with elevated CRP levels. Further trials are needed to confirm the potential benefits of statins amongst individuals with elevated CRP levels.

Inflammatory markers and coronary heart disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite changes in lifestyle and the use of effective pharmacologic interventions to lower cholesterol levels, coronary heart disease remains the major cause of morbidity and mortality in the developed world. Cholesterol screening fails to identify almost 50% of those individuals who will present with acute coronary syndromes. Recent evidence from laboratory and prospective clinical studies demonstrates that atherosclerosis is not simply a disease of lipid deposition, but rather is an inflammatory process with highly specific cellular and molecular responses. The clinical utility of inflammatory markers has been examined in a variety of atherothrombotic diseases. Because C-reactive protein is highly stable in stored frozen samples, and automated and robust analytical systems for its measurement are available, it has become the most widely examined inflammatory marker.

RECENT FINDINGS

C-reactive protein has consistently been shown to be a useful prognostic indicator in acute coronary syndromes and is a strong predictor of future coronary events in apparently healthy individuals. In addition, C-reactive protein can identify individuals with normal lipid levels who are at increased risk for future coronary events. Because drugs such as aspirin and statins reduce inflammatory risk, C-reactive protein has the potential to guide the use of these therapies in high-risk individuals for primary prevention.

SUMMARY

C-reactive protein may have a role in global risk assessment for primary prevention and in targeting those patients who will benefit from anti-inflammatory therapies. In addition, it may also be a good prognostic indicator in patients with acute coronary syndromes.