The azimilide post-infarct survival evaluation (ALIVE) trial

The Increasing Role of Rhythm Control in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

The considerable mortality and morbidity associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) pose a substantial burden on patients and health care services. Although the management of AF historically focused on decreasing AF recurrence, it evolved over time in favor of rate control. Recently, more emphasis has been placed on reducing adverse cardiovascular outcomes using rhythm control, generally by using safe and effective rhythm-control therapies (typically antiarrhythmic drugs and/or AF ablation). Evidence increasingly supports early rhythm control in patients with AF that has not become long-standing, but current clinical practice and guidelines do not yet fully reflect this change. Early rhythm control may effectively reduce irreversible atrial remodeling and prevent AF-related deaths, heart failure, and strokes in high-risk patients. It has the potential to halt progression and potentially save patients from years of symptomatic AF; therefore, it should be offered more widely.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in Seniors with Heart Failure: Present Dilemmas and Therapeutic Considerations: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Heart Failure (HF) is a global public health problem, which affects over 23 million people worldwide. The prevalence of HF is higher among seniors in the USA and other developed countries. Ventricular Arrhythmias (VAs) account for 50% of deaths among patients with HF. We aim to elucidate the factors associated with VAs among seniors with HF, as well as therapies that may improve the outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library databases, Science Direct, and Google Scholar were searched using specific keywords. The reference lists of relevant articles were searched for additional studies related to HF and VAs among seniors as well as associated outcomes.

RESULTS

The prevalence of VAs increases with worsening HF. A 24-hour Holter electrocardiogram may be useful in risk stratifying patients for device therapy if they do not meet the criterion of low ventricular ejection fraction. Implantable Cardiac Defibrillators (ICDs) are superior to anti-arrhythmic drugs in reducing mortality in patients with HF. Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) together with device therapy may be required to reduce symptoms. In general, the proportion of seniors on GDMT is low. A combination of ICDs and cardiac resynchronization therapy may improve outcomes in selected patients.

CONCLUSION

Seniors with HF and VAs have high mortality even with the use of device therapy and GDMT. The holistic effect of device therapy on outcomes among seniors with HF is equivocal. More studies focused on seniors with advanced HF as well as therapeutic options are, therefore, required.

Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Approximately half of people with heart failure have chronic kidney disease (CKD). Pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with CKD have the potential to reduce death (any cause) or hospitalisations for decompensated heart failure. However, these interventions are of uncertain benefit and may increase the risk of harm, such as hypotension and electrolyte abnormalities, in those with CKD.

OBJECTIVES

This review aims to look at the benefits and harms of pharmacological interventions for HF (i.e., antihypertensive agents, inotropes, and agents that may improve the heart performance indirectly) in people with HF and CKD.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies through 12 September 2019 in consultation with an Information Specialist and using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials of any pharmacological intervention for acute or chronic heart failure, among people of any age with chronic kidney disease of at least three months duration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened the records to identify eligible studies and extracted data on the following dichotomous outcomes: death, hospitalisations, worsening heart failure, worsening kidney function, hyperkalaemia, and hypotension. We used random effects meta-analysis to estimate treatment effects, which we expressed as a risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. We applied the GRADE methodology to rate the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

One hundred and twelve studies met our selection criteria: 15 were studies of adults with CKD; 16 studies were conducted in the general population but provided subgroup data for people with CKD; and 81 studies included individuals with CKD, however, data for this subgroup were not provided. The risk of bias in all 112 studies was frequently high or unclear. Of the 31 studies (23,762 participants) with data on CKD patients, follow-up ranged from three months to five years, and study size ranged from 16 to 2916 participants. In total, 26 studies (19,612 participants) reported disaggregated and extractable data on at least one outcome of interest for our review and were included in our meta-analyses. In acute heart failure, the effects of adenosine A1-receptor antagonists, dopamine, nesiritide, or serelaxin on death, hospitalisations, worsening heart failure or kidney function, hyperkalaemia, hypotension or quality of life were uncertain due to sparse data or were not reported. In chronic heart failure, the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) (4 studies, 5003 participants: RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.02; I² = 78%; low certainty evidence), aldosterone antagonists (2 studies, 34 participants: RR 0.61 95% CI 0.06 to 6.59; very low certainty evidence), and vasopressin receptor antagonists (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.55 to 2.89; 2 studies, 1840 participants; low certainty evidence) on death (any cause) were uncertain. Treatment with beta-blockers may reduce the risk of death (any cause) (4 studies, 3136 participants: RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.79; I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence). Treatment with ACEi or ARB (2 studies, 1368 participants: RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.90; I² = 97%; very low certainty evidence) had uncertain effects on hospitalisation for heart failure, as treatment estimates were consistent with either benefit or harm. Treatment with beta-blockers may decrease hospitalisation for heart failure (3 studies, 2287 participants: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.05; I² = 87%; low certainty evidence). Aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia compared to placebo or no treatment (3 studies, 826 participants: RR 2.91, 95% CI 2.03 to 4.17; I² = 0%; low certainty evidence). Renin inhibitors had uncertain risks of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 142 participants: RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.49; I² = 0%; very low certainty). We were unable to estimate whether treatment with sinus node inhibitors affects the risk of hyperkalaemia, as there were few studies and meta-analysis was not possible. Hyperkalaemia was not reported for the CKD subgroup in studies investigating other therapies. The effects of ACEi or ARB, or aldosterone antagonists on worsening heart failure or kidney function, hypotension, or quality of life were uncertain due to sparse data or were not reported. Effects of anti-arrhythmic agents, digoxin, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, renin inhibitors, sinus node inhibitors, vasodilators, and vasopressin receptor antagonists were very uncertain due to the paucity of studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The effects of pharmacological interventions for heart failure in people with CKD are uncertain and there is insufficient evidence to inform clinical practice. Study data for treatment outcomes in patients with heart failure and CKD are sparse despite the potential impact of kidney impairment on the benefits and harms of treatment. Future research aimed at analysing existing data in general population HF studies to explore the effect in subgroups of patients with CKD, considering stage of disease, may yield valuable insights for the management of people with HF and CKD.

Clinical management and prevention of sudden cardiac death

Despite the revolutionary advancements in the past 3 decades in the treatment of ventricular tachyarrhythmias with device-based therapy, sudden cardiac death (SCD) remains an enormous public health burden. Survivors of SCD are generally at high risk for recurrent events. The clinical management of such patients requires a multidisciplinary approach from postresuscitative care to a thorough cardiovascular investigation in an attempt to identify the underlying substrate, with potential to eliminate or modify the triggers through catheter ablation and ultimately an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) for prompt treatment of recurrences in those at risk. Early recognition of low left ventricular ejection fraction as a strong predictor of death and association of ventricular arrhythmias with sudden death led to significant investigation with antiarrhythmic drugs. The lack of efficacy and the proarrhythmic effects of drugs catalyzed the development and investigation of the ICD through several major clinical trials that proved the efficacy of ICD as a bedrock tool to detect and promptly treat life-threatening arrhythmias. The ICD therapy is routinely used for primary prevention of SCD in patients with cardiomyopathy and high risk inherited arrhythmic conditions and secondary prevention in survivors of sudden cardiac arrest. This compendium will review the clinical management of those surviving SCD and discuss landmark studies of antiarrhythmic drugs, ICD, and cardiac resynchronization therapy in the primary and secondary prevention of SCD.

Inhibitory effect of azimilide on Na+/Ca2+ exchange current in guinea-pig cardiac myocytes

We examined the effect of azimilide, a class III antiarrhythmic drug, on Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange current (I(NCX)) in guinea-pig cardiac single ventricular cells. External application of azimilide suppressed bi-directional I(NCX) in a concentration-dependent manner. IC(50) values for outward and inward I(NCX) were 45 and 40 µM, respectively, with Hill coefficients of 1. Azimilide attenuated I(NCX) in the presence of trypsin in the patch pipette, indicating that azimilide is a trypsin-insensitive NCX inhibitor. Delayed afterdepolarization induced by electrical stimulation with ouabain disappeared in the presence of 30 µM azimilide. We conclude that azimilide inhibits NCX at supratherapeutic concentrations.

Gender differences in arrhythmias

Electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic differences between men and women have long been noted. Women have a higher intrinsic heart rate than men, along with a longer corrected QT interval and a shorter sinus nodal recovery time. The incidence of and risk factors for a variety of arrhythmias differ between men and women. Atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia has a 2:1 female-to-male predominance, while accessory pathways are twice as frequent in men. Although atrial fibrillation is more prevalent in men of all age groups, the absolute numbers of men and women with atrial fibrillation are equal, and the associated morbidity and mortality experienced by women with atrial fibrillation appear to be worse. Women have a lower incidence of sudden cardiac death, and female survivors of sudden cardiac death have a lower frequency of spontaneous or inducible ventricular tachycardia. On the other hand, drug-induced torsade de pointes and symptomatic long QT syndrome have a female predominance. Therefore, greater caution should be used when prescribing QT-prolonging drugs in women. The incidence of arrhythmias is increased during pregnancy, and management of pregnant patients poses a significant challenge. The mechanisms of these gender differences are unclear but may be related to hormonal effects and the shorter QT interval in adult males. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapies are usually equally efficacious, but the risks of pharmacologic therapy are different in men and women. Atrial fibrillation may be more difficult to treat in women.

Pharmacologic approaches to rhythm versus rate control in atrial fibrillation—where are we now?

Until recently, contemporary drug treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) focused primarily on restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm, predicated on the belief that if AF is abolished then problems associated with AF would be abolished too. Recently completed clinical trials using drug therapy and comparing maintenance of sinus rhythm with control of ventricular rate have challenged this assumption, showing that simple control of ventricular rate with anticoagulation is an acceptable primary therapy, notably in older patients with persistent AF, minimally symptomatic or asymptomatic, and at increased risk for thromboembolic events. However, rate control and anticoagulation is not a panacea; existing trial results should not be interpreted to mean all patients should be treated with the rate control approach. Despite the limited efficacy and poor safety of current antiarrhythmic drugs, strategies for maintenance of sinus rhythm remain justified in many patients, such as those with first-episode AF, highly symptomatic patients, younger patients, and those with a history of congestive heart failure (CHF). Commonly used current and some investigational agents designated for "rhythm control" have enough pharmacologic overlap with rate control agents to be considered to have a dual mode of action, simultaneously addressing both rhythm and rate control. Furthermore, there is much interest in non-pharmacologic therapies, such as radiofrequency ablation, for rhythm control. The lack of appropriately designed and controlled trials at this time makes it difficult to determine the place of radiofrequency ablation and its impact on the rhythm versus rate question.

Topics on the Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger: Pharmacological Characterization of Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger Inhibitors

Using the whole-cell voltage clamp, we examined acute effects of various agents on Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange current (I(NCX)) in guinea-pig cardiac ventricular cells and transfected cells. Among the antiarrhythmic drugs, amiodarone, bepridil, dronedarone, cibenzoline, azimilide, and aprindine inhibited I(NCX) in a concentration-dependent manner. We also investigated the effects on NCX of 2,3-buanedione monoxim (BDM) and selective NCX inhibitors such as KB-R7943, SEA0400, and SN-6. The presence of trypsin in the pipette solution attenuated the inhibitory effects on NCX of amiodarone, bepridil, and BDM, suggesting that these drugs inhibit NCX from the cytosolic side. In contrast, the trypsin-insensitive NCX inhibitors were aprindine, azimilide, dronedarone, cibenzoline, KB-R7943, SEA0400, and SN-6. KB-R7943, SEA0400, and SN-6 suppressed the uni-directional outward I(NCX) more potently than the uni-directional inward I(NCX). The mechanism of this mode-dependency is unknown, but is suggested to be related to intracellular Na(+) concentration.

Short-period heart rate variability in the general population as compared to patients with acute myocardial infarction from the same source population

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to compare the distribution and determinants of heart rate variability (HRV) measures in a middle-aged population with patients of the same sex and age after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), and to show, whether HRV values defined as abnormal from the general population are indicative for a worse prognosis even in AMI patients.

METHODS

HRV was studied in a random sample of 149 middle-aged men and 137 women from the general population (45-65 years) as well as 129 consecutive AMI patients (25-74 years). Spectral analysis was used to compute low frequency (LF), high frequency (HF), and total frequency power. To the AMI population of age 45-65 years (N = 85) a sample out of the general population was matched by age and sex by 2:1 matching (N = 149). All AMI patients were followed for a median of 43 months (range 1-47) for death or malignant arrhythmia.

RESULTS

All measures of HRV were significantly and substantially lower in AMI patients than the general population (P < 0.001). Expression in relative terms revealed that the proportionate contributions of HF and LF to total power were significantly different in the two populations with relatively lower LF power in AMI patients (P < 0.01). The negative correlation with heart rate and HRV measures was significantly more pronounced in AMI patients (P < 0.01). The 2.5th percentile of the LF power distribution in the general population (3.08 ln ms2) corresponds to the 25th percentile in the AMI population. Subjects of the whole AMI population with values below this LF cutpoint revealed a significant increased risk of death or malignant arrhythmia during follow-up (odds ratio 5.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.3; 23).

CONCLUSIONS

AMI patients had strongly diminished HRV compared to the general population. The relatively lower LF power indicates an alteration of the sympathico-vagal balance, and the significantly stronger correlation of heart rate with HRV may be indicative for a more pronounced effect of sympathetic activation on autonomic modulation in the case of myocardial infarction. Finally, a value below the 2.5th percentile of the population LF power distribution may identify subjects at risk and warrant further testing.

Have sanctioned algorithms replaced empiric judgment in the selection process of antiarrhythmic drugs for the therapy for atrial fibrillation?

Treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) includes rate control, anticoagulation, rhythm control, and therapy of any underlying structural heart disease and/or AF precipitant. Rhythm control, restoration of and maintenance of sinus rhythm (NSR), is required in patients who remain significantly symptomatic despite rate control. Rhythm control generally employs antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD). When the selection of AADs was limited, and included only class IA agents, the choice of drug to use was empiric, guided by anticipated tolerance and compliance. Now, with multiple classes of AADs available and with a better understanding of organ toxic and proarrhythmic risks, algorithms to guide drug selection have become both popularized and sanctioned. Notably, although such algorithms are now the standard of care and the norms to which practitioners should be held regarding the selection of an AAD for AF management, they have not removed empiricism and clinical judgment from the AAD selection process. Clinical decision making is still required to select from among any group of drug options as listed in the published algorithms, and to select the dosing regimen to use. Prior history, dosing frequency, desirability of b-blocking effect, electrolyte status, renal function, concomitant therapies, site of initiation, and anticipated patient compliance are also all nonalgorithmic issues in the decision process.

The efficacy of azimilide in the treatment of atrial fibrillation in the presence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of oral azimilide dihydrochloride (AZ) 100 mg versus placebo on the onset, termination, and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in a subpopulation of patients in the Azimilide Postinfarct Survival Evaluation (ALIVE) trial.

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical trials have demonstrated the antiarrhythmic effects of AZ in patients with AF. Azimilide was investigated for its effects on mortality in patients with depressed left ventricular (LV) function after recent myocardial infarction (MI) and in a subpopulation of patients with AF.

METHODS

A total of 3,381 post-MI patients with depressed LV function were enrolled in this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of AZ 100 mg on all-cause mortality. A total of 93 patients had AF on the baseline 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). An additional 27 patients developed AF after initially being in sinus rhythm at randomization. These patients were identified through 12-lead ECGs obtained during routine visits at week 2, months 1, 4, 8, and 12.

RESULTS

Patients with AF at baseline had a higher mortality than those without AF (p = 0.0006). Among AF patients, there was no difference in mortality between AZ patients and placebo patients (p = 0.82). Fewer AZ patients developed AF than placebo patients (p = 0.04). More AZ patients than placebo patients converted to sinus rhythm, but this difference did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.076). Over one-year follow-up, more AZ patients were in sinus rhythm than placebo patients (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Azimilide was safe and effective AF therapy in patients with depressed LV function after an MI.

A review of clinical trials assessing the efficacy and safety of newer antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation

Clinical trials assessing the efficacy of anti- arrhythmic drugs for terminating atrial fibrillation have demonstrated that rate control drugs have little to no added efficacy compared to placebo; however, spontaneous conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation is common. Antiarrhythmic drugs such as oral dofetilide, oral bolus-flecainide and propafenone and intravenous ibutilide all have a role in terminating atrial fibrillation. Active comparator trials have demonstrated that amiodarone is more efficacious in maintaining sinus rhythm than propafenone and sotalol. Multiple trials have demonstrated the safety of amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide and azimilide in a post-myocardial infarction population and amiodarone and dofetilide in a congestive heart failure population. Newer antiarrhythmic agents, some with novel mechanisms of action, will add to the pharmacologic armamentarium in treating atrial fibrillation.

Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure:

AF in Heart Failure. Atrial fibrillation and congestive heart failure are commonly occurring cardiac disorders that often exist concomitantly. The prognostic significance of the presence or absence of atrial fibrillation, as an independent risk factor, in patients with heart failure remains controversial. Antiarrhythmic drugs with good hemodynamic profiles and neutral effects on survival are preferred treatments for converting atrial fibrillation and maintaining sinus rhythm. Other standard therapies for congestive heart failure, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and beta-blockers also have a role in the treatment of these coexisting disease states. The article presents an overview of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure and reviews the prevalence, prognostic significance, and efficacy of various antiarrhythmic agents for the conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm.

Multiple cellular electrophysiological effects of azimilide in canine cardiac preparations

The cellular electrophysiological effect of azimilide (0.1-30 microM) was analyzed in canine ventricular preparations by applying the standard microelectrode and patch-clamp techniques at 37 degrees C. In papillary muscle, the drug prolonged the action potential duration (APD) in a concentration-dependent manner at a cycle length (CL) of 1000 ms. In Purkinje fibers, at the same CL, the concentration-dependent lengthening of the APD was observed in the presence of up to 3 microM azimilide (at 3.0 microM: 24.1+/-4.2%, n=9); at higher drug concentration, no further APD prolongation was observed. Azimilide lengthened APD in a reverse frequency-dependent manner in papillary muscle and Purkinje fibers alike. Azimilide (10 microM) caused a rate-dependent depression in the maximal upstroke velocity of the action potential (V(max)) in papillary muscle. The time and rate constants of the offset and onset kinetics of this V(max) block were 1754+/-267 ms (n=6) and 5.1+/-0.4 beats (n=6), respectively. Azimilide did not prevent the APD shortening effect of 10 microM pinacidil in papillary muscle, suggesting that the drug does not influence the ATP-sensitive K(+) current. Azimilide inhibited the rapid (I(Kr)) and slow component (I(Ks)) of the delayed rectifier K(+) current and the L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca)). The estimated EC(50) value of the drug was 0.59 microM for I(Ks), 0.39 microM for I(Kr) and 7.5 microM for I(Ca). The transient outward (I(to)) and the inward rectifier (I(k1)) K(+) currents were not influenced by the drug. It is concluded that the site of action of azimilide is multiple, it inhibits not only K(+) (I(Kr), I(Ks)) currents but, in higher concentrations, it also exerts calcium- and use-dependent sodium channel block.

Atrial fibrillation: epidemiologic considerations and rationale for conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm

Atrial fibrillation is now the most common cardiac arrhythmia for which a patient is hospitalized. Clinically, it presents in a form that is paroxysmal, persistent, or permanent and may be symptomatic or asymptomatic, occurring in the setting of either no cardiac disease ("lone atrial fibrillation") or, most often, in association with an underlying disease. Atrial fibrillation is associated with a 2-fold increase in mortality and, in the United States alone, causes over 75,000 cases of stroke per year. The annual prevalence of stroke is 5% to 7%, but the use of adequate anticoagulation can reduce this to less than 1%. Atrial fibrillation is a disorder of the elderly, with almost equal prevalence in men and women. In the United States, 80% of atrial fibrillation occurs in patients over the age of 65 years, and its prevalence tracks that of heart failure, which may be the cause, as well as the result, of the arrhythmia. Both conditions are increasing in epidemic proportions in the aging population. The most common causes of atrial fibrillation are hypertensive heart disease, coronary artery disease, and heart failure with a miscellany of lesser conditions, with about 10% lacking structural heart disease. Unlike other supraventricular arrhythmias, cure by the use of catheter ablation and surgical techniques has not been a reality except in a relatively small number of cases. However, restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm remain the initial goal of therapy for most patients. Pharmacologic approaches remain the mainstay of therapy for rate control and anticoagulation as well as for maintenance of sinus rhythm following pharmacological or electrical conversion. The changing epidemiology of atrial fibrillation is highlighted, with the focus on its conversion by the use of newer and novel antifibrillatory agents relative to the mechanisms of the arrhythmia, to restore the stability of sinus rhythm.

Gender, ethnicity, and genes in cardiovascular disease. Part 2: implications for pharmacotherapy

Women are underrepresented in clinical trials. Lower doses of beta-blockers are required for Southeast Asians. ACE and ARB's are teratogenic in the second trimester. Torsades de Pointes is more common in women related to a longer QT-interval. Lower dose OCPs decrease the risk of MI, stroke and thrombosis. HRTs are not effective for CAD prevention.

New approaches to atrial fibrillation management: a critical review of a rapidly evolving field

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, the prevalence of which is increasing with the aging of the population. Because of its clinical importance and the lack of highly satisfactory management approaches, AF is the subject of active clinical and research efforts. This paper reviews recent and on-going developments in pharmacological and non-drug management of AF. The ideal therapeutic goal for AF is the production and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Comparative studies suggest that available class I and III drugs have comparable and modest efficacy for sinus rhythm maintenance. Amiodarone, with actions of all antiarrhythmic classes, has recently been shown to have clearly superior efficacy compared with other available drugs. Newer agents are in development, but their advantages are as yet unclear and appear limited. A potentially interesting approach is the prescription of drugs upon the occurrence of an attack, rather than on a continuous basis. Recent insights into AF mechanisms may permit therapy to prevent development of the AF substrate. An alternative to sinus rhythm maintenance is a rate control approach, with no attempt to prevent AF. Drugs to effect rate control include digitalis, beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists. Digitalis has limited value for control of exercise heart rate and for paroxysmal AF, but is particularly well suited for patients with concomitant AF and congestive heart failure. AV-nodal ablation and pacing is an effective alternative for rate control but leaves the patient pacemaker dependent. The relative merits of rate versus rhythm control are being evaluated in ongoing trials, preliminary results of which indicate no statistically significant differences in primary endpoints but highlight the risks of rhythm control therapy. In patients requiring pacemakers, physiological pacing (dual chamber devices or atrial pacing) has an advantage over purely ventricular pacemakers in AF prevention. Newer pacing modalities that produce more synchronised atrial activation, as well as pacemakers that prevent excessive atrial rate swings, show promise in AF prevention and may soon see wider use. The usefulness of automatic atrial defibrillators is presently limited by discomfort during shocks. Targeted destruction of pulmonary vein foci by radiofrequency catheter ablation suppresses paroxysmal AF. Efficacy in persistent AF is lower and still under study. Problems include potential recurrence in other veins and a small but nontrivial risk of pulmonary vein stenosis. Surgical division of the atria into zones with limited electrical connection, the MAZE procedure, is highly effective in AF prevention but is a major intervention that is not applicable to most patients. In conclusion, significant advances are being made in the management of patients with AF but much more work remains to be done.

Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic options to maintain sinus rhythm: guideline-based and new approaches

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia in patients with heart failure and is responsible for substantial morbidity and mortality. Restoration and preservation of sinus rhythm, therefore, has a premium. Of the numerous treatment options available, many must be avoided because of their potential for adverse effects or because of limited proof of efficacy in defined populations. Published guidelines provide help by synthesizing clinical trial data into a recommended approach. This article summarizes current information regarding the best methods applicable to patients with left ventricular dysfunction for rate control, sinus rhythm restoration and maintenance, and stroke prevention. New and evolving therapies and how they might fit into the evolving treatment paradigm are also briefly reviewed.

Old and new antiarrhythmic drugs for converting and maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: comparative efficacy and results of trials

In managing atrial fibrillation (AF), the main therapeutic strategies include rate control, termination of the arrhythmia, and the prevention of recurrences and thromboembolic events. Safety and efficacy considerations are important in optimizing the choice of an antiarrhythmic drug for the treatment of AF. Recently approved antiarrhythmics, such as dofetilide, and promising investigational drugs, such as azimilide and dronedarone, may change the treatment landscape for AF. For medical conversion of recent-onset AF, class IC antiarrhythmic drugs, administered as an oral bolus, have been demonstrated to be the most efficacious pharmacologic conversion agents. Intravenous ibutilide and oral dofetilide both have efficacies superior to placebo in controlled trials for converting persistent AF. Comparative trials in paroxysmal AF have demonstrated that flecainide, propafenone, quinidine, and sotalol are equally effective in preventing recurrences of AF. Amiodarone has been demonstrated to be more efficacious than propafenone or sotalol in the Canadian Trial of Atrial Fibrillation. In persistent AF, twice-daily dofetilide has been shown to be as or more effective than low-dose sotalol given twice daily for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with AF. Trials have demonstrated that subjective adverse effects are less frequent with class IC drugs, sotalol, and dofetilide compared with such drugs as quinidine. In patients without structural heart disease, flecainide, propafenone, and D,L-sotalol are the initial drugs of choice, given their reasonable efficacy, low incidence of subjective side effects, and lack of significant end-organ toxicity. Treating AF in patients with left ventricular dysfunction can be difficult because of associated electrophysiologic derangements, potential proarrhythmic concerns, and negative inotropic effects of antiarrhythmics. Some data exist suggesting that angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers can prevent AF either by preventing atrial dilation and stretch-induced arrhythmias or by blocking the renin-angiotensin system. In post-myocardial infarction patients, D,L-sotalol, dofetilide, and amiodarone-and in congestive heart failure patients, amiodarone and dofetilide-have demonstrated neutral effects on survival in controlled trials. In the Congestive Heart Failure Survival Trial of Antiarrhythmic Therapy (CHF-STAT), amiodarone lowered the frequency of AF development and improved left ventricular ejection fraction over time. In CHF-STAT, there was lower mortality in patients who converted from AF to sinus rhythm. Dofetilide decreased rehospitalization for congestive heart failure in the Danish Investigations of Arrhythmia and Mortality on Dofetilide (DIAMOND) trials. Neutral effects on survival and favorable hemodynamics have positioned amiodarone and dofetilide as the antiarrhythmics of choice in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. In post-myocardial infarction patients, sotalol is an additional agent to consider for treatment of AF in this setting.

Circadian heart rate and blood pressure variability considered for research and patient care

OBJECTIVES

To review mechanisms of circadian variations in heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV) and mortality and morbidity due to cardiovascular diseases (CVD).

METHODS

Results from 7-day/24-h HRV and BPV are interpreted by gender and age-specified reference values in the context of a Medline search.

RESULTS

Abnormal HRV and BPV measured around the clock for 7 days provides information on the risk of subsequent morbid events in subjects without obvious heart disease and without abnormality outside the conventional (in the sense of chronobiologically unquantified) physiological range. Meditation, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, n-3 fatty acids and estrogens may have a beneficial influence on HRV, but there is no definitive outcome-validated therapy. Low HRV has been associated with a risk of arrhythmias and arrhythmic death, unstable angina, myocardial infarction, progression of heart failure and atherosclerosis. BPV may be characterized by treatable circadian-hyper-amplitude-tension (CHAT), which can be transient '24-h CHAT' or '7-day-CHAT', MESOR-hypertension and/or an unusually-timed (odd) circadian acrophase (ecphasia), all associated with an increased risk of stroke, stroke death, myocardial infarction, and kidney disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Precise insight into the patho-physiology in time of HRV and BPV is needed with development of a consensus on best measures of HRV for clinical purposes and to determine when a 7-day record interpreted chronobiologically suffices and when it does not, for detection within as well as outside the conventional normal range, for diagnostic clinical practice and to direct therapy of risk greater than that associated with hypertension, smoking or any other risk factor.

Arrhythmias in Patients with Heart Failure

Both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are very common in patients with congestive heart failure, and their presence is associated with symptoms, significant morbidity, and mortality. Studies have attempted to determine the prognostic significance of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias in patients with heart failure. Whether atrial fibrillation is an independent risk factor of mortality remains controversial. The presence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy identifies patients at high risk for sudden death. However, in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy there is not a strong correlation between ventricular arrhythmias and increased risk for sudden death. Multiple trials using antiarrhythmic drugs, pharmacologic therapy, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators have been performed in an attempt to improve survival in patients 1) post-myocardial infarction; 2) with congestive heart failure, with and without nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; and 3) with sustained ventricular tachycardia and those who have survived an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The purpose of this article is to present an overview of arrhythmias in patients with heart failure and discuss the prevalence, prognostic significance, complications, mechanisms, and trials that have formed the current therapies presently used.

Azimilide inhibits multiple cardiac potassium currents in human atrial myocytes

BACKGROUND

Studies in animal cell preparations suggest that azimilide may produce a more desirable rate-dependent profile of class III action as a result of its effects on both the slowly (I(Ks)) and rapidly (I(Kr)) activating components of potassium current (I(K)). However, relatively little is known about the effects of azimilide on K(+) currents in human atrial cells. The present study investigated the effect of azimilide on the inward rectifier potassium current (I(K1)), delayed rectifier potassium current (I(K)), ultrarapid delayed rectifier current (I(Kur)), and transient outward potassium current (I(to)) in isolated single human atrial myocytes.

METHODS

The tight-seal, whole-cell voltage clamp technique was used to investigate the acute effects of azimilide on K(+) currents in single human atrial myocytes. The cells were isolated enzymatically from atrial tissues that were obtained from patients undergoing open-heart surgeries, with the approval of the local Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

The average cell capacitance of the human atrial myocytes was 77.5 +/- 2.8 pF (Mean +/- standard error of mean, total 28 cells from 17 patients). We found that 100 microM of azimilide in the extracellular solution significantly inhibited the inward rectifier potassium current (12.3 +/- 3.1 vs 6.7 +/- 2.0 pA/pF, n = 12, P < 0.05) at the testing potential of -100 mV. Superfusion with 100 microM of azimilide for 10 minutes inhibited I(K) by 51.7 +/- 5.1% (from 3.4 +/- 0.5 to 1.6 +/- 0.2 pA/pF, n = 9, P < 0.01) at the clamping membrane potential of +40 mV. Human atrial cell I(Kur) was inhibited with 100 microM of azimilide by 38.6 +/- 4.4% (from 3.9 +/- 0.5 to 2.3 +/- 0.2 pA/pF, n = 9, P < 0.01, test potential = 40 mV). We also found that the average peak current amplitude of I(to) in these cells was significantly inhibited with 100 microM of azimilide by 60.3 +/- 5.9% (from 10.3 +/- 1.5 to 3.6 +/- 0.3 pA/pF, n = 6, P < 0.01, test potential = 50 mV).

CONCLUSION

The present study provides direct evidence that azimilide inhibits multiple cellular transmembrane K(+) currents in freshly isolated human atrial myocytes. Inhibition of these K(+) currents by azimilide, especially of I(Ks) and I(Kur) is likely to be the electrophysiologic basis for the prolongation of the action potential duration in the human atria which mediates its known antifibrillatory effects in atrial fibrillation and flutter.

Maintaining stability of sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation: antiarrhythmic drugs versus ablation

In managing atrial fibrillation, the main therapeutic strategies include rate control, termination of the arrhythmia, and pr vention of recurrences and thromboembolic events. Rate control with digoxin, b-blockers, verapamil, and diltiazem may be preferred in drug refractory and sedentary patients with markedly dilated left atrium and atrial fibrillation of long duration. Drugs useful in the maintenance of sinus rhythm include quinidine, procainamide, disopyramide, sotalol, amiodarone, dofetilide, flecainide, and propafenone. In patients with structural heart disease, the class III antiarrhythmics are the initial drugs of choice, given their neutral effects on survival in a post-myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure population. Due to high recurrence rates with pharmacologic therapy, nonpharmacologic options of therapy include atrioventricular junction ablation, atrial defibrillators, catheter ablation of pulmonary vein foci, and attempts to perform an atrial Maze procedure using catheters. Hybrid therapy using drugs in combination with nonpharmacologic approaches will be used more frequently in the future for refractory patients.

Mechanisms of antiarrhythmic drug actions and their clinical relevance for controlling disorders of cardiac rhythm

This review on antiarrhythmic drugs traces the evolution of the fundamental mechanisms of action of drugs that have been used to control disorders of cardiac rhythm. It describes the very earliest data from experimental studies that dealt with the effects of acute and chronic administration of drugs in whole animals combined with the measurements of the action potential duration and the effective refractory period in isolated tissues. Antiarrhythmic drugs were found to have properties consistent with the block of fast sodium channel conduction, adrenergic blockade, repolarization block, and the block of slow-channel mediated conduction especially in the atrioventricular node. Over the past 15 years, the attention has focused on atrial tissue with atrial fibrillation emerging as the most common arrhythmia in clinical practice. Drug-induced increases in refractoriness as a function rate and in wavelength (product of refractoriness and conduction velocity), and a reduction in numbers of wavelets have been found to be critical in the conversion of atrial fibrillation and maintenance of sinus rhythm. The continued development of newer pharmacologic agents is likely to lead to the resolution of the controversy regarding rhythm versus rate control in various clinical subsets of the arrhythmia by controlled clinical trials.

Can nutrition influence circadian rhythm and heart rate variability?

Recent studies indicate that there is an interaction between biorhythms, the biological clock and triggers, which may be important in the pathogenesis of altered heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure variability (BPV). Circadian rhythms are under the influence of, and physiological variables are mediated by the activation of the adrenals, sympathetic/parasympathetic, hypothalamic and pituitary activity. Emotional stress, physical exertion, sleep deprivation and large fatty meals are major triggers of myocardial ischemia, angina, infarction, sudden cardiac death (SCD) and stroke. These events have been reported to exhibit a circadian variation with increased frequency in the second quarter of the day, which has also been observed in our studies on Indians. Recent studies indicate that altered HRV and BPV are also important in the pathogenesis and progression of heart failure, atheroma and thrombosis. Mediation via beta-blockers, oestrogens, n-3 fatty acids, vitamin E and coenzyme Q10 and fasting appears to have a beneficial influence whereas progestins, nifedipine, stress and exercise may have an adverse effect on HRV and BPV. We have reported that plasma levels of vitamin E and C are lower in the second quarter of the day than at other times, indicating their role in the pathogenesis of variability and cardiac events. Prospective studies also indicate that HRV and BPV are important and independent risk factors for cardiovascular events. However, no study has yet been conducted in patients with abnormal HRV and BPV in a randomized, placebo-controlled intervention trial to find out whether improvement in variability can cause a significant reduction in cardiovascular events. There is a need to study the role of n-3 fatty acids, coenzyme Q10, the effect of regular physical training, medication and ACE inhibitors in patients with abnormal HRV and BPV to demonstrate that improving variability can modulate cardiovascular events.

Evaluation and management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common cardiac arrhythmia with significant sequela. The goals of treating atrial fibrillation are rate control, prevention of thromboembolism, and maintenance of sinus rhythm. The epidemiology and pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation is reviewed, as well as strategies and recommendations for achieving therapeutic goals. The authors also review investigational therapeutic options using nonpharmacologic modalities.

Azimilide and dofetilide produce similar electrophysiological and proarrhythmic effects in a canine model of Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias

Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias are a feared proarrhythmic effect of (antiarrhythmic) drugs. In dogs with chronic complete AV-block bradycardia-induced volume overload leads to electrical remodeling, which includes increased susceptibility to drug-induced Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias. The IKr channel blocker, dofetilide (Tikosyn, 0.025 mg/kg/5 min), and the less specific ion channel blocker, azimilide (5 mg/kg/5 min), were compared in nine anesthetized dogs at 4 and 6 weeks of AV-block in a randomized cross-over design. Dosages were based on our own dose-dependence studies and on anti-arrhythmic dosages reported in the literature. Monophasic action potential catheters were placed endocardially in both the left and right ventricle to measure action potential duration, visualize early afterdepolarizations, and to assess interventricular dispersion of repolarization (i.e. left ventricular monophasic action potential duration (at 100%) minus right ventricular monophasic action potential duration (at 100%). Cycle length of idioventricular rhythm, QT-time and the occurrence of drug-induced Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias were determined using the surface electrocardiogram (ECG). Before drug administration, the electrophysiological parameters were identical at 4 and 6 weeks. Both azimilide and dofetilide increased monophasic action potential duration, cycle length of idioventricular rhythm, and QT-time. Dissimilar lengthening of left ventricular and right ventricular monophasic action potential duration increased the interventricular dispersion significantly from 55 to 110 ms for both drugs. All dogs had early afterdepolarizations, while, in the majority, ectopic ventricular beats developed (dofetilide 8/9 and azimilide 7/9). Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias incidence was comparable for dofetilide (6/9) and azimilide (5/9). In conclusion, azimilide and dofetilide show similar electrophysiological and proarrhythmic effects in our canine model with a high incidence of Torsade de Pointes arrhythmias.

Effects of azimilide on cardiovascular tissues from normo- and hypertensive rats

We tested whether azimilide has potential for use in the treatment of heart failure. Azimilide, > or =3 x 10(-5) M, had no effect on the quiescent Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rat aorta, or mesenteric and intralobar pulmonary arteries. Azimilide > or =3 x 10(-5) M relaxed the KCl-contracted aorta and portal vein. Azimilide, 10(-7)-10(-5) M, prolonged the WKY left ventricular action potential and augmented the force of contraction of left ventricle strips from 12- and 22-month-old WKY rats. Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs), at ages 12 and 22 months, are models of cardiac hypertrophy and failure, respectively. The augmentation of force with azimilide was similar on 12- and 22-month-old WKY rats and 12-month-old SHRs but reduced on the 22-month-old SHR left ventricle. Azimilide, 3 x 10(-6) and 10(-5) M, augmented the force responses of the 22-month-old SHR left ventricle by 40 and 50%, respectively. As azimilide is a vasodilator and positive inotrope in the rat, and the positive inotropic effect is present in heart failure, azimilide should undergo further testing as a positive inotrope for the treatment of heart failure.

Drug choices in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

When considering therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), the dominant issues are rate control, anticoagulation, rhythm control, and treatment of any underlying disorder. Drug choices for rate control include beta-blockers, verapamil and diltiazem, and digitalis as first-line agents, with consideration of other sympatholytics, amiodarone, or nonpharmacologic approaches in resistant cases. Anticoagulation may be accomplished with aspirin or warfarin, with the latter preferred in all older or high-risk patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy may be used (1) to produce cardioversion (most effective with ibutilide or class IC agents in recent onset AF); (2) to facilitate electrical conversion (class III agents); (3) to prevent early reversion after cardioversion; (4) to maintain sinus rhythm during chronic therapy; and/or (5) to facilitate conversion of fibrillation to flutter, which may then be amenable to termination or prevention with antitachypacing or ablative techniques. Antiarrhythmic drug selection for AF is guided by efficacy considerations (most drugs are similar), by convenience, cost, and discontinuation considerations; and, most importantly, by safety considerations. When possible, agents with serious organ toxicity potential and proarrhythmic risk should be avoided as first-line choices. In structurally normal hearts, class IC antiarrhythmic drugs are least proarrhythmic and least organ toxic (when considered together). In normal hearts, sotalol, dofetilide, and potentially azimilide also appear to have attractive profiles. Amiodarone has low proarrhythmic risk but can produce bradyarrhythmias and toxicity. In hypertrophied hearts, the risk of torsade de pointes with class III/IA agents is enhanced, whereas in ischemia or conditions with impaired cell contact, whether functionally (as by ischemia) or anatomically (as by fibrosis, infiltration, etc), proarrhythmic risk with class I antiarrhythmic drugs (sustained ventricular fibrillation/flutter) is greatly increased. The class I drugs should be avoided in these circumstances. Additional issues to consider are where to initiate therapy (in- or outpatient), what follow-up protocols to use, and whether to limit therapy to proprietary drugs or to allow generic formulation substitution. Each of these considerations is detailed in this article.

Appropriate outcome measures in trials evaluating treatment of atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a widespread disease that has only recently received the focused attention of arrhythmia specialists despite being the most frequently occurring significant cardiac arrhythmia.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The wide variety of trial designs used to evaluate AF treatment is a reflection of the diverse outcomes associated with this condition. The best trials assess the impact of treatment on a clearly measured outcome that is of clinical relevance to patients. This review discusses the different designs of AF treatment trials and analyzes the utility of the various outcomes that can be assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

A sensible goal of AF treatment is to reduce the frequency of recurrences and to prolong the time between them. The most appropriate trials focus on AF recurrences that are symptomatic and therefore relevant to the patient. We still do not know if there is value in AF prevention, beyond preventing symptoms. However, ongoing and future studies will show whether AF suppression reduces the longer-term risks of stroke or death and improves patient quality of life. Cost of care will increasingly be studied in future trials of AF management.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the neonate

The neonate presents a challenge for the practitioner considering antiarrhythmic therapy: pharmacokinetics are different than in older children or adults; and the arrhythmia substrate may also differ, with respect to issues of ion channel and autonomic nervous system development. This paper reviews the need for antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the neonate, developmental aspects of pharmacokinetics, autonomic regulation and cellular electrophysiology and the antiarrhythmics available today with an emphasis on newer drug therapy.

Azimilide

Azimilide is a potassium channel antagonist that, in contrast to existing class III antiarrhythmic agents, blocks both the rapidly (I(Kr)) and slowly (I(Ks)) activating components of the delayed rectifier potassium current. In animal and clinical studies, azimilide prolonged repolarisation by increasing the action potential duration and effective refractory period. In animal models, azimilide was effective in terminating both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Azimilide also demonstrated antifibrillatory efficacy in a canine model of sudden cardiac death. In patients with a history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, oral azimilide controlled arrhythmias more effectively than placebo in a 6-month randomised double-blind study. At a dosage of 125 mg once daily, azimilide significantly increased the time to first symptomatic recurrence of atrial fibrillation/flutter. However, no significant difference between placebo and azimilide was found in another study. Oral azimilide 100 mg once daily demonstrated clinically significant treatment effects in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. In clinical trials, azimilide was generally well tolerated and headache was the most commonly occurring adverse event. Azimilide is associated with a low incidence of proarrhythmic events, such as torsades de pointes, and few serious adverse events have been reported.

New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy

In the past 2 years, significant advances have been made in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy. In patients with ventricular arrhythmias and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), antiarrhythmic agents are increasingly being used as adjunct therapy to decrease the frequency of ICD discharges. Sotalol was recently shown to be effective in reducing tachyarrhythmias in patients with ICDs. Intravenous amiodarone is being used for the acute treatment of unstable ventricular arrhythmia and is being investigated for the treatment of acute out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Class III agents are increasingly being used for prophylaxis in patients who have atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, and data point to an important role for these agents in reducing supraventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac surgery. Future studies will need to directly compare these agents with pure anti-adrenergic maneuvers in postoperative patients. In addition to terminating atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter, ibutilide significantly reduces human atrial defibrillation thresholds and increases the percentage of patients who can be cardioverted from atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm. The US Food and Drug Administration is expected to approve dofetilide for clinical use soon, and it is currently reviewing azimilide (which seems to be devoid of frequency-dependent effects on repolarization) for prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. Dronedarone, tedisamal, and trecetilide are now under active study intended to determine their usefulness in patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Experimental studies are ongoing to identify pharmacologic agents that will selectively prolong repolarization in the atria without exerting electrophysiologic effects in the ventricles.

Measurement of heart rate variability: a clinical tool or a research toy?

The objectives of this review are to discuss the diversity of mechanisms that may explain the association between heart rate (HR) variability and mortality, to appraise the clinical applicability of traditional and new measures of HR variability and to propose future directions in this field of research. There is a large body of data demonstrating that abnormal HR variability measured over a 24-h period provides information on the risk of subsequent death in subjects with and without structural heart disease. However, the mechanisms responsible for this association are not completely established. Therefore, no specific therapy is currently available to improve the prognosis for patients with abnormal HR variability. Reduced HR variability has been most commonly associated with a risk of arrhythmic death, but recent data suggest that abnormal variability also predicts vascular causes of death, progression of coronary atherosclerosis and death due to heart failure. A consensus is also lacking on the best HR variability measure for clinical purposes. Time and frequency domain measures of HR variability have been most commonly used, but recent studies show that new analysis methods based on nonlinear dynamics may be more powerful in terms of risk stratification. Before the measurement of HR variability can be applied to clinical practice and used to direct therapy, more precise insight into the pathophysiological link between HR variability and mortality are needed. Further studies should also address the issue of which of the HR variability indexes, including the new nonlinear measures, is best for clinical purposes in various patient populations.

Implantable defibrillators and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients at risk for lethal arrhythmias

The high mortality rate and frequency of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with congestive heart failure has prompted numerous clinical trials aimed at reducing mortality by addressing arrhythmic death. Recently completed trials have suggested that for patients who have survived cardiac arrest, the preferred treatment may be an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). From the standpoint of primary prevention, implantable defibrillators and amiodarone have received the most attention. It remains unclear, however, to which patients these studies apply, and if and how the results might be generalized. No available studies confirm an additional benefit of pharmacologic or device-based antiarrhythmic therapy beyond that offered by optimal treatment with beta blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and lipid-lowering drugs in the majority of patients with cardiomyopathy. Clinical trials are ongoing to address these issues.

Antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation: focus on prolonging atrial repolarization

Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been the subject of considerable attention and intensive clinical research in recent years. Current opinion among physicians on the management of AF favors the restoration and maintenance of normal sinus rhythm. This has several potential benefits, including the alleviation of arrhythmia-associated symptoms, hemodynamic improvements, and possibly a reduced risk of thromboembolic events. After normal sinus rhythm has been restored, antiarrhythmic therapy is necessary to reduce the frequency of AF recurrence. In the selection of an antiarrhythmic agent, both efficacy and safety should be taken into consideration. Many antiarrhythmic agents have the capacity to provoke proarrhythmia, which may result in an increase in mortality. This is of particular concern with sodium-channel blockers in the context of patients with structural heart disease. Flecainide and propafenone are well tolerated and effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients without significant cardiac disease but with AF. Recent interest has focused on the use of class III antiarrhythmic agents, such as amiodarone, sotalol, dofetilide (recently approved), ibutilide (approved for chemical conversion of AF and atrial flutter), and azimilide (still to be approved) in patients with AF and structural heart disease. To date, amiodarone and sotalol still hold the greatest interest, and although controlled clinical trials with these agents have been few, a number are in progress and some have been recently completed. These agents are effective in maintaining normal sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF and are associated with a low incidence of proarrhythmia when used appropriately. Because of the relative paucity of placebo-controlled trials of antiarrhythmic agents in patients with AF, experience until recently has tended to dictate treatment decisions. Increasingly, selection of drug therapy is being based on a careful and individualized benefit-risk evaluation by means of controlled clinical trials, an approach that is likely to dominate the overall approach to the control of atrial fibrillation in the largest numbers of cases of the arrhythmia. Pharmacologic therapy is likely to be dominated by compounds that exert their predominant effect by prolonging atrial repolarization.

Prevalence, characteristics and prognostic value during long-term follow-up of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction in the thrombolytic era

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence, characteristics and the predictive value of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) for subsequent death and arrhythmic events after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

BACKGROUND

Nonsustained VT has been linked to an increased risk for sudden death in coronary patients. It is unknown whether this parameter can be used for selection of high-risk patients to receive an implantable defibrillator for primary prevention of sudden death in patients shortly after AMI.

METHODS

In 325 consecutive infarct survivors, 24-h Holter monitoring was performed 10+/-6 days after AMI. All patients underwent coronary angiography, determination of left ventricular function and assessment of heart rate variability (HRV). Mean follow-up was 30+/-22 months.

RESULTS

There was a low prevalence (9%) of nonsustained VT shortly after AMI. Nonsustained VT together with depressed left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was found in only 2.4% of patients. During follow-up, 25 patients reached one of the prospectively defined end points (primary composite end point of cardiac death, sustained VT or resuscitated ventricular fibrillation; secondary end point: arrhythmic events). Kaplan Meier event probability analyses revealed that only HRV, LVEF and status of the infarct-related artery were univariate predictors of death or arrhythmic events. The presence of nonsustained VT carried a relative risk of 2.6 for the primary study end point but was not a significant predictor if only arrhythmic events were considered. On multivariate analysis, only HRV, LVEF and the status of the infarct artery were found to be independently related to the primary study end point.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a low prevalence of nonsustained VT shortly after AMI. Only 2% to 3% of all infarct survivors treated according to contemporary guidelines demonstrate both depressed LVEF and nonsustained VT. The predictive value of nonsustained VT for subsequent mortality and arrhythmic events is inferior to that of impaired autonomic tone, LVEF or infarct-related artery patency. Accordingly, the use of nonsustained VT to select patients for primary implantable cardioverter/defibrillator prevention trials shortly after AMI appears to be limited.

Association of the alpha-fibrinogen Thr312Ala polymorphism with poststroke mortality in subjects with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

The alpha-fibrinogen Thr312Ala polymorphism occurs in close proximity to several sites important for factor XIIIa-dependent cross-linking, which raises the possibility that it affects fibrin clot stability.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We determined the association of this polymorphism with ischemic stroke, stroke subtype, and poststroke mortality. There was no significant difference in the genotype distributions of patients with acute ischemic stroke (n=519) and healthy control subjects (n=423), nor was there any association of this polymorphism with stroke subtype. In a Cox regression model, a significant interaction between Thr312Ala and atrial fibrillation was identified in relation to poststroke mortality (P=0.002). In subjects in sinus rhythm (n=418), there was no difference according to genotype in the proportion of subjects who survived (approximately 60% in each group), whereas in subjects with atrial fibrillation (n=101), there was decreased survival in those possessing the A allele (TT=42.1%, TA=18%, AA=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Thr312Ala polymorphism may give rise to an increased susceptibility for embolization of intra-atrial clot, and these findings could have important implications for identifying subjects most at risk of developing thromboembolic complications.

What should we expect from the next generation of antiarrhythmic drugs?

Five drugs currently constitute approximately 70% of the world market for antiarrhythmic medications. Since the publication of studies documenting that certain Class I drugs may increase mortality in high-risk postinfarction patients, basic science and clinical studies have focused on Class III antiarrhythmic drugs. However, drugs that prolong repolarization and cardiac refractoriness are sometimes associated with potentially lethal torsades de pointes. Amiodarone, a multichannel blocker, may be the exception to this observation, but it nevertheless fails to reduce total mortality compared with placebo in high-risk patients following myocardial infarction. However, Class III agents remain the focus of drug development efforts because they lack the negative hemodynamic effects, affect both atrial and ventricular tissue, and can be administered as either parenteral or oral preparations. Developers of newer antiarrhythmic agents have focused on identifying antiarrhythmic medications with the following characteristics: appropriate modification of the arrhythmia substrate, suppression of arrhythmia triggers, efficacy in pathologic tissues and states, positive rate dependency, appropriate pharmacokinetics, equally effective oral and parenteral formulations, similar efficacy in arrhythmias and their surrogates, few side effects, positive frequency blocking actions, and cardiac-selective ion channel blockade. New and investigational agents that more closely approach these goals include azimilide, dofetilide, dronedarone, ersentilide, ibutilide, tedisamil, and trecetilide. In the near future, medications will increasingly constitute only part of an antiarrhythmic strategy. Instead of monotherapy, they will often be used in conjunction with an implanted device. Combination therapy offers many potential advantages. Long-term goals of antiarrhythmic therapy include upstream approaches, such as identification of the biochemical intermediaries of the process and, eventually, of molecular and genetic lesions involved in arrhythmogenesis.

Arrhythmias and women

The incidence and risk factors for a variety of arrhythmias differ among men and women. Although symptomatic atrial reentrant tachycardias have a female predominance, the reverse is true for atrial fibrillation. Women have a lower incidence of sudden death. On the other hand, drug-induced torsades de pointes and symptomatic long QT syndrome have a female predominance. The incidence of arrhythmias seem to be increased during pregnancy. The mechanisms of these gender differences are unclear but may be related to hormonal effects and the shorter QT interval in men. Pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic therapy are equally efficacious in men and women.

New advances in class III antiarrhythmic drug therapy

During the past 10 years there has been a major shift in antiarrhythmic drug development from class I to class III antiarrhythmic agents. The first two class III antiarrhythmic drugs that became available, sotalol and amiodarone, also have potent antiadrenergic actions. Newer antiarrhythmic drugs either block a specific ionic current (e.g., dofetilide-induced blockade of the rapidly activating component of the delayed rectifier potassium current) or block multiple ionic channels (e.g., ibutilide and azimilide) in order to prolong atrial and ventricular action potentials without other specific pharmacologic effects. Recent data suggest that these new class III antiarrhythmic drugs are highly effective for treating patients with rhythm disorders with an acceptable degree of proarrhythmia. This manuscript reviews the newer class III agents' effectiveness in treating atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and the recent studies examining drug-induced prolongation of atrial repolarization to prevent or terminate postoperative atrial fibrillation.

A decade of clinical trial developments in postmyocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia patients: from CAST to AVID and beyond. Cardiac Arrhythmic Suppression Trial. Antiarrhythmic Versus Implantable Defibrillators

Multiple trials using antiarrhythmic drugs, pharmacologic therapy, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators have been performed in an attempt to improve survival in patients: (1) postmyocardial infarction; (2) with congestive heart failure, with and without nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; and (3) with sustained ventricular tachycardia and those who have survived an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. This article reviews some of the key findings and limitations of completed and ongoing trials. We also make recommendations for the current treatment of such patients based on the results of these trials.