Cost effectiveness of ribavirin/interferon alfa-2b after interferon relapse in chronic hepatitis C

The cost-effectiveness of birth-cohort screening for hepatitis C antibody in U.S. primary care settings

BACKGROUND

In the United States, hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is most prevalent among adults born from 1945 through 1965, and approximately 50% to 75% of infected adults are unaware of their infection.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of birth-cohort screening.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness simulation.

DATA SOURCES

National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, U.S. Census, Medicare reimbursement schedule, and published sources.

TARGET POPULATION

Adults born from 1945 through 1965 with 1 or more visits to a primary care provider annually.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Societal, health care.

INTERVENTION

One-time antibody test of 1945-1965 birth cohort.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Numbers of cases that were identified and treated and that achieved a sustained viral response; liver disease and death from HCV; medical and productivity costs; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs); incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS

Compared with the status quo, birth-cohort screening identified 808,580 additional cases of chronic HCV infection at a screening cost of $2874 per case identified. Assuming that birth-cohort screening was followed by pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN+R) for treated patients, screening increased QALYs by 348,800 and costs by $5.5 billion, for an ICER of $15,700 per QALY gained. Assuming that birth-cohort screening was followed by direct-acting antiviral plus PEG-IFN+R treatment for treated patients, screening increased QALYs by 532,200 and costs by $19.0 billion, for an ICER of $35,700 per QALY saved.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

The ICER of birth-cohort screening was most sensitive to sustained viral response of antiviral therapy, the cost of therapy, the discount rate, and the QALY losses assigned to disease states.

LIMITATION

Empirical data on screening and direct-acting antiviral treatment in real-world clinical settings are scarce.

CONCLUSION

Birth-cohort screening for HCV in primary care settings was cost-effective.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

Division of Viral Hepatitis, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Cost effectiveness and quality of life considerations in the treatment of hepatitis C infection

Chronic hepatitis C1 is a common cause of liver disease worldwide. It is a slow and progressive condition which can lead to decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatitis C virus1 impairs quality of life (QOL) even in the absence of chronic liver disease, but its relative silent nature can lead to a delay in diagnosis. The current standard of care of treatment is pegylated interferon and ribavarin. This achieves a sustained virological response (SVR), which is a cure of infection, in up to 80% of patients depending on viral genotype. The attainment of SVR improves survival, avoids long-term complications, and improves QOL. But treatment is not only expensive; there are issues of tolerability and adverse effects. This has led to a multitude of cost effective analysis and health technology assessment on HCV treatment. This overview discusses the natural history of the virus infection and its effect on the patients’ QOL. It focuses on the treatment options available, their efficacy, and cost effectiveness. It reviews the evaluations that suggest combination therapy is cost effective and explores the assumptions and limitations of these studies in real world treatment arenas.

Long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antiviral treatment in hepatitis C

We systematically reviewed the evidence for long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of antiviral treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis C. We performed a systematic literature search on the long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of AVT in hepatitis C (1990-March 2007), and included health technology assessment (HTA) reports, systematic reviews, long-term clinical trials, economic studies conducted alongside clinical trials and decision-analytic modelling studies. All costs were converted to 2005euro. Antiviral therapy with peginterferon plus ribavirin in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C was the most effective (3.6-4.7 life years gained [LYG]) treatment and was reasonably cost-effective (cost-saving to 84 700euro/quality adjusted life years [QALY]) when compared to interferon plus ribavirin. Some results also suggest cost-effectiveness (below 8400euro/(QALY) of re-treatment in nonresponders/relapsers. Results for patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels or with special co-morbidities (e.g. HIV) or risk profiles were rare. We conclude that antiviral therapy may prolong life, improve long-term health-related quality-of-life and be reasonably cost-effective in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C as well as in former relapsers/nonresponders. Further research is needed in patients with specific co-morbidities or risk profiles.

Economics of chronic hepatitis B and hepatitis C

Although not all patients develop progressive liver disease, chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C infections cause substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. To address this need, many new antiviral treatments have become available over the past 10 years. While safety, efficacy, and therapeutic indications have been well established for these agents, the economics of antiviral treatment have become increasingly a focus of discussion for physicians, policymakers, and health payers. In this paper, we will elucidate some economic principles using examples from the treatment of hepatitis B and C. In particular, we will examine the considerations in estimating drug costs, methods for performing economic analyses and lastly summarize published cost-effectiveness analyses for antiviral treatments of chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C. This review should help clinicians understand economic issues regarding new drugs and answer questions about whether the clinical benefit provided by a medication justifies its expense.

Cost-utility analysis of different peg-interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin treatment strategies as initial therapy for naïve Chinese patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Different peg-interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin treatment strategies are more effective in treating hepatitis C. However, no cost-effectiveness data have been published using the clinical data from the peg-interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in the treatment of patients with hepatitis C in Taiwan.

AIM

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of different treatments with peg-interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for the initial treatment of patients with different genotype chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Individual patient level data from a randomized clinical trial with peg-interferon plus ribavirin were applied to a Markov model to project lifelong clinical outcomes. Economic estimates and quality of life were based on published data and Taiwan patient data. We used a societal perspective and applied a 3% annual discount rate.

RESULTS

Compared with different combination therapy strategies, peg-interferon alpha-2b plus weight-based dosing of ribavirin in all patients for 24 weeks is the most cost-effective treatment strategy. If the sustained virological response of peg-interferon plus ribavirin treatment for 48 weeks therapy in genotype 1 patients was higher than 67.8%, the best strategy of treating patients will be the peg-interferon plus weight-based dosing of ribavirin therapy for 48 weeks in genotype 1 patients and for 24 weeks in non-genotype 1 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Peg-interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination for 24 weeks therapy in all genotype patients should reduce the incidence of liver complications, prolong life, improve quality of life and be cost-effective for the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

Hepatitis C: cost of illness and considerations for the economic evaluation of antiviral therapies

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects 170 million individuals worldwide. As it is detected incidentally through the evaluation of liver function tests or at the time of blood donor testing, it is usually clinically silent until the advanced stages of liver disease have occurred, when treatment is less effective and shortages of donor liver organs limit the therapeutic options. Combination therapy with ribavirin and pegylated interferon has resulted in sustained viral negative response rates of 54-61%. Because treatment is expensive and not uniformly effective, and because not all chronically infected patients will develop complications, concerns have arisen regarding the cost effectiveness of combination therapy. This paper reviews the public health and individual implications of HCV infections. Because of the latency of infection, numerous country-specific population analyses suggest that HCV will cause an increasing number of liver-related deaths over the next 10 years, despite the dramatic drop in incidence over the past 10-15 years. These deaths will be related to prevalent HCV infection from transfusion and injection drug use prior to identification of the virus and availability of screening tests in the late 1980s and early 1990s. HCV can reduce life expectancy and impair quality of life, yet not all patients will develop progressive liver disease, and antiviral treatment may have associated adverse effects. Finally, to assess the value of antiviral drugs for HCV infection, this paper reviews studies examining the costs of antiviral drugs and of the disease itself along with response to antiviral therapy and the cost effectiveness of antiviral therapy. Although antiviral therapy appears to be expensive, when also considering the likelihood of sustained viral response to therapy, and the cost savings, quality-of-life improvement and prolongation of life expectancy from the prevention of HCV complications, antiviral treatment for HCV appears to be cost effective when compared with other well accepted medical interventions.

The effect of zinc supplementation on the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients with interferon and ribavirin

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of zinc supplementation on serum zinc and copper levels, and the severity of adverse reactions and virologic responses in chronic hepatitis C patients undergoing interferon (IFN)/ribavirin therapy.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Forty subjects were randomly assigned to receive IFN-alpha-2a/ribavirin with or without zinc gluconate for 24 weeks, then a period of 6 months for follow-up. Twenty healthy controls were also enrolled in the study. Blood samples were collected at different time points during therapy and at 6 months after the completion of therapy and were analyzed for zinc and copper levels. The adverse reactions and the virologic responses were also examined accordingly.

RESULTS

Serum zinc levels were significantly lower in chronic hepatitis C patients than in healthy controls and further depressed by IFN/ribavirin treatment. However, serum zinc levels in patients were remediable by zinc supplements. No apparent difference was seen in virologic responses between subjects with or without zinc supplements, but certain adverse side effects associated with the zinc therapy were significantly decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Zinc supplementation may be a complementary therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients to increase the tolerance to IFN-alpha-2a and ribavirin.

Efficacy, tolerability and cost effectiveness of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and biologic agents in rheumatoid arthritis

Over the last decade, several new drugs have become available for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. These agents include the new disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) leflunomide and the biologic agents, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists and an interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist. Methotrexate is commonly used as the first DMARD, has a well documented clinical efficacy and slows radiological deterioration. Sulfasalazine appears to have similar properties, albeit to a lesser extent. Leflunomide has similar efficacy as methotrexate but it is less tolerated than sulfasalazine. The adverse effect profiles of these three drugs makes regular laboratory monitoring mandatory. Several combination therapies with DMARDs were proven to be more effective than mono-DMARD therapy. However, until now these strategies have not been widely adopted. TNF antagonists are potent anti-inflammatory drugs, with a rapid onset of effects compared with traditional DMARDs. The IL-1 receptor antagonist, anakinra, has an intermediate place between methotrexate and the TNF antagonists with respect to efficacy. The adverse effects of TNF antagonists include an increased incidence of common and opportunistic infections. Thus far, anakinra has not been associated with an enhanced rate of opportunistic infections. Some of the biologic agents have been associated with worsening heart failure and demyelinating disease. The limited long-term safety data of the biologic agents are a point of concern because, at present, an enhanced risk for malignancies, particularly lymphoma, can not be excluded. Drug costs of traditional DMARDs are up to US dollars 3000 per year, whereas for the biologics the yearly drug costs range between US dollars 16,000 and > US dollars 20,000. Cost-effectiveness analyses are necessary to determine whether or not these high costs are justified. Unfortunately, adequate, prospective, economic evaluations are not yet available. Until these become available, treatment decisions will be based on the balance of direct costs and indirect costs and expected cost savings in the future.

Using competence network collaboration and decision-analytic modeling to assess the cost-effectiveness of interferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin as initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Germany

The objective of this study was to translate and apply a decision-analytic model for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) to the German health care context using competence network collaboration. The German Hepatitis C Model (GEHMO) competence network used a systematic multistep approach to identify and transfer a high quality Markov model for CHC to the German health care context. GEHMO was used to project lifetime clinical and economic outcomes and to determine the cost-effectiveness of initial antiviral therapy with interferon a-2b plus ribavirin from a societal perspective. In 40-year-old patients combination therapy for 24 and 48 weeks increased life expectancy by 1.6 and 2.3 years, respectively, compared with interferon alone for 48 weeks. The discounted incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) for combination therapy were euro 5,500 per quality-adjusted life-year gained (QALY) for 24 weeks and euro 6,800/QALY for 48 weeks of treatment. ICUR was euro 9,800/QALY for moving from 24 to 48 weeks of treatment. Combination therapy remained cost-effective in sensitivity analyses. In conclusion, combination therapy with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin is effective and cost-effective compared with other well-accepted medical treatments. Competence network collaboration and decision modeling provide a useful and efficient approach to combine evidence from international studies with country-specific parameters.

The costs of not treating hepatitis C virus infection in injecting drug users in New Zealand

This paper estimates future health service costs of the current practice in New Zealand of not funding treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections. Costs are estimated separately for Māori and non-Māori, male and female IDUs. Markov modelling is used to track the infection and progression of HCV to severe liver disease and death, and accumulated costs are estimated for the life of the cohort. Upper and lower estimates of costs are calculated based on different assumptions of the rate of progression of HCV to more severe liver disease. Costs are estimated at dollars 24.6 million per 1000 non-Māori men IDUs (discounted at 3%), under progression assumptions based on liver clinic studies, compared with dollars 10.3 million per 1000 using lower rates of progression based on community studies. Similarly, corresponding costs for non-Māori women are estimated at dollars 27.6 million and $11.2 million per 1000 IDUs. Costs for women are higher because their greater life expectancy is associated with more cases of liver cirrhosis (LC) at older ages. Future costs for Māori are lower than non-Māori, because Māori are more likely to die at younger ages and hence fewer progress to more advanced liver disease. The current situation in New Zealand of not treating HCV infections will result in considerable future costs as some people with HCV progress to more severe liver disease. Provisional estimates are that the accumulated costs of HCV-related liver disease for all IDUs currently infected will be between dollars 166 million at lower rates of disease progression (discounted at 3%) to dollars 400 million at upper rates. Some of the associated morbidity and mortality could have been avoided if the HCV infections had been treated.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of therapeutic strategies for patients with chronic hepatitis C previously not responding to interferon

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of combination therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C previously not responding to interferon monotherapy is lower than that in naive patients, and there has been no economic evaluation in this population.

AIM

To develop a cost-effectiveness analysis of therapeutic regimens with interferon-alpha and ribavirin in previous interferon non-responders.

METHODS

A Markov simulation model was used to project the clinical and economic outcomes of five different therapeutic strategies, including a 'no treatment' alternative, using the health care system perspective. The efficacy data for the different doses and durations were obtained from a previously performed meta-analysis. A sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the model, analysing changes in different variables.

RESULTS

Applying a 3% discount rate, the standard patient on combination therapy for 12 months showed increases of 0.80 years and 1.55 quality-adjusted life years, when compared with the 'no treatment' strategy. This option led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 11,767 euros per year of life gained and 6073 euros per quality-adjusted life year.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with interferon plus ribavirin is cost-effective in previous interferon non-responders and is within the range of some well-accepted medical interventions in our health care system.

Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 54 weeks of infliximab for rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To estimate the cost-effectiveness of infliximab plus methotrexate for active, refractory rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

We projected the 54-week results from a randomized controlled trial of infliximab into lifetime economic and clinical outcomes using a Markov computer simulation model. Direct and indirect costs, quality of life, and disability estimates were based on trial results; Arthritis, Rheumatism, and Aging Medical Information System (ARAMIS) database outcomes; and published data. Results were discounted using the standard 3% rate. Because most well-accepted medical therapies have cost-effectiveness ratios below $50,000 to $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, results below this range were considered to be "cost-effective."

RESULTS

At 3 mg/kg, each infliximab infusion would cost $1393. When compared with methotrexate alone, 54 weeks of infliximab plus methotrexate decreased the likelihood of having advanced disability from 23% to 11% at the end of 54 weeks, which projected to a lifetime marginal cost-effectiveness ratio of $30,500 per discounted QALY gained, considering only direct medical costs. When applying a societal perspective and including indirect or productivity costs, the marginal cost-effectiveness ratio for infliximab was $9100 per discounted QALY gained. The results remained relatively unchanged with variation of model estimates over a broad range of values.

CONCLUSIONS

Infliximab plus methotrexate for 54 weeks for rheumatoid arthritis should be cost-effective with its clinical benefit providing good value for the drug cost, especially when including productivity losses. Although infliximab beyond 54 weeks will likely be cost-effective, the economic and clinical benefit remains uncertain and will depend on long-term results of clinical trials.

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a review of its use in the management of chronic hepatitis C

Relatively few patients (< or =20%) with chronic hepatitis C achieve a sustained virological response after interferon-alpha monotherapy. Hence, alternative treatment strategies such as the addition of the broad spectrum antiviral agent ribavirin to interferon-alpha-2b have been investigated. Combination therapy with subcutaneous interferon-alpha-2b [3 million units (MU) three times per week] plus oral ribavirin (1000 to 1200 mg/day) has proven effective in several well designed trials of 24 to 48 weeks' duration in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C. Compared with interferon-alpha-2b (3 or 6 MU three times per week) with or without placebo, combination treatment with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin significantly enhanced end-of-treatment and sustained virological and biochemical response rates in treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients [sustained virological response rates in treatment-naive recipients (6 to 19% vs 31 to 43% of patients); sustained overall (virological plus biochemical) response rates in nonresponders to (1 vs 14%) or relapsers (4 to 5% vs 30 to 44%) after previous interferon-alpha monotherapy]. Forty-eight weeks of combination therapy was superior to 24 weeks in treatment-naive patients infected with hepatitis virus C (HCV) genotype 1, whereas response rates were similar at 24 and 48 weeks in those infected with other HCV genotypes. Furthermore, there were marked improvements in histological inflammatory scores in patients who responded to treatment with either interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin or interferon-alpha-2b alone. Although adverse events associated with either drug during combination therapy occurred frequently, these were generally mild to moderate in intensity and were consistent with those reported for each individual agent. Twenty-six percent of patients required dosage modifications of one or both drugs during combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is an efficacious first- and second-line therapy in adult patients with compensated chronic hepatitis C, significantly improving sustained virological and biochemical responses versus interferon-alpha-2b monotherapy. The tolerability profile of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin therapy is consistent with the individual profiles of these agents with no evidence of additive effects. The place of interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy in relation to newer agents, including pegylated interferons-alpha and other multidrug regimens, remains to be determined in this rapidly evolving area of therapeutic management. Currently, combination therapy with interferon-alpha-2b plus ribavirin is recommended as first-line therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C and compensated liver disease, and is an option for use as second-line therapy in those who have relapsed after, or failed to respond to, previous treatment with interferon-alpha.

Ribavirin-induced sperm shape abnormalities in Wistar rat

Ribavirin (1-beta-D-ribofuranosyl-1,2,4, triazole-3 carboxamide) is a broad-spectrum antiviral drug. This study was aimed to investigate the mutagenicity of ribavirin on germ cells by employing sperm morphology assay. Male Wistar rats were treated with water, cyclophosphamide (CP) 40 mg/kg, and ribavirin 20, 100 and 200 mg/kg (i.p.) for 5 consecutive days at intervals of 24h. Following the last exposure, at 14, 28, 35, 42 and 70 days, the epididymal sperm smears were obtained and stained according to the standard procedure. One thousand sperms per animal were classified into normal and different abnormal types. Both CP and ribavirin-induced anomalies of head and tail of sperm except at 70 days. In CP groups, maximum incidence was observed at 28, 35 and 42 days. Ribavirin 20 mg/kg induced maximum incidence at 14 and 42 days, 100 mg/kg at 28 and 42 days and 200 mg/kg at 28-42 days. These results show that ribavirin is mutagenic to rat germ cells in a transient fashion.

Management strategies for ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia in the treatment of hepatitis C: clinical and economic implications

OBJECTIVES

Recently published studies have demonstrated increased efficacy and cost-effectiveness of combination therapy with interferon and alpha-2b/ribavirin compared with interferon-alpha monotherapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Combination therapy is associated with a clinically important adverse effect: ribavirin-induced hemolytic anemia (RIHA). The objective of this study was to evaluate the direct health-care costs and management of RIHA during treatment of CHC in a clinical trial setting.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted to synthesize information on the incidence and management of RIHA. Decision-analytic techniques were used to estimate the cost of treating RIHA. Uncertainty was evaluated using sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

RIHA, defined as a reduction in hemoglobin to less than 100 g/L, occurs in approximately 7% to 9% of patients treated with combination therapy. The standard of care for management of RIHA is reduction or discontinuation of the ribavirin dosage. We estimated the direct cost of treating clinically significant RIHA to be $170 per patient receiving combination therapy per 48-week treatment course (range $68-$692). The results of the one-way sensitivity analyses ranged from $57 to $317. In comparison, the cost of 48 weeks of combination therapy is $16,459.

CONCLUSIONS

The direct cost of treating clinically significant RIHA is 1% ($170/$16,459) of drug treatment costs. Questions remain about the optimal dose of ribavirin and the incidence of RIHA in a real-world population. Despite these uncertainties, this initial evaluation of the direct cost of treating RIHA provides an estimate of the cost and management implications of this clinically important adverse effect.

Historical features are poor predictors of liver fibrosis in Canadian patients with chronic hepatitis C

The progression of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection (HCV) is related to host factors including age, gender and alcohol consumption. Due to the morbidity and potential mortality of liver biopsy, a noninvasive method of assessing hepatic fibrosis is needed. The aim of this study was to assess the utility of historical features in predicting fibrosis using published rates of fibrosis progression. The charts of 239 untreated patients with HCV were reviewed; patients who had a liver biopsy and whose duration of infection could be estimated (n=106) were categorized according to gender, age at infection (< or = or > 40 years) and peak alcohol consumption (< or > or = 50 g/day). Estimates of fibrosis were calculated using the product of the interval between infection and biopsy and published rates of fibrosis progression. Estimates were compared with liver biopsies staged according to the Metavir system (F0-F4; F0=no fibrosis; F4= cirrhosis). The mean age of patients was 42 +/- 8 years, 61% were male and 36% consumed > 50 g of alcohol daily. The mean duration of infection was 19 +/- 9 years (range, 1-40) and ALT was elevated > 1.5 times upper normal in 63%. When patients were classified into those with mild (F0-F2) and severe (F3-F4) fibrosis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of an estimate of mild fibrosis was 60%, 55%, 78% and 34%, respectively. An estimate of severe fibrosis had a sensitivity of 55%, specificity of 60%, positive predictive value of 34% and negative predictive value of 78%. Agreement between fibrosis estimates and actual histological stages was poor (kappa = 0.13, P=0.08). The prediction of hepatic fibrosis in HCV infection using historical features and published rates of fibrosis progression is poor in a Canadian clinical practice setting. Alternate noninvasive methods of predicting hepatic fibrosis are needed.

What is (cost) effective in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection?

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection often progresses to chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis, and possibly hepatocellular carcinoma. Chronic hepatitis C infection is a leading cause of chronic liver disease and the most common indication for liver transplantation. Combination therapy of interferon alpha and ribavirin is currently the standard regimen for chronic hepatitis C. This combination can achieve viral clearance in approximately 40% of patients, and improve histology and prognosis. The most cost-effective approach to guide duration of combination therapy is HCV genotyping. Cost effectiveness cannot be improved further by taking other well-defined predictive factors for sustained virological response into account. Recent insights into HCV kinetics and the correlation between initial viral decline and sustained virological response will allow us to optimize and individually tailor antiviral treatment Individualized treatment according to the initial viral decline, together with further improvements in drugs (e.g. by long-acting pegylated interferons), will have new impact on antiviral efficacy and cost effectiveness.

A pharmacoeconomic appraisal of therapies for hepatitis B and C

In the recent years, advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C have shown that newer, more expensive therapy may result in higher sustained viral response rates. In light of this, the pertinent question for healthcare decision-makers centres around whether this increase in efficacy 'justifies' the additional cost. Pharmacoeconomics is dedicated to helping answer these types of questions. In this article, we will discuss the clinical aspects of hepatitis B and C, recent advances in treatment and studies of the cost-effectiveness of these treatments.

Current therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Chronic hepatitis C virus infection is common in the United States with an estimated prevalence of 2.7 million persons. Fortunately, the incidence of new infections has markedly declined in recent years and the natural history of chronic hepatitis usually only results in significant progression after several decades of infection. However, the majority of chronically infected patients acquired their infections more than 20 years ago; these patients with long-standing chronic hepatitis are now presenting in increasing numbers with decompensated cirrhosis and the need for liver transplantation. Cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis C is now the most common indication for liver transplantation. Interferon monotherapy became clinically available 10 years ago but resulted in sustained improvement in liver disease and durable loss of detectable virus in fewer than 10% of treated patients. The recent use of the combination of interferon with the nucleoside analogue ribavirin for 6-12 months results in a sustained virological response in 30%-40% of previously untreated patients. The response to this combination therapy is also excellent in patients who had initially responded to interferon monotherapy and later relapsed. Furthermore, some recent studies suggest that a small proportion of patients who failed to respond to a prior course of interferon (primarily noncirrhotic patients with low levels of virus and genotypes other than 1) may also benefit from retreatment with this combination.