Reliability coefficients of three corneal pachymeters

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using three different imaging devices

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values and evaluate the agreement obtained with three different devices in healthy eyes.

METHODS

A total of 120 eyes of 60 healthy individuals (36 men and 24 women) were enrolled in this retrospective study. CCT measurements were performed using an optical biometer (AL-Scan), spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) (Topcon 3D) and ultrasonic pachymetry (UP) (Accupach VI), and the results were compared. Bland-Altman analysis was used to quantify the agreement between methods.

MAIN RESULTS

The mean patient age was 28±5.73years (18-40years). The mean CCT values obtained by AL-Scan, UP, and SD-OCT were 532.4μm±29.7, 549μm±30.4, and 547μm±30.6, respectively. The mean differences in CCT were 15.30±9.52μm between AL-Scan and OCT (P<0.01), 17.15±8.42μm between AL-Scan and UP (P<0.01), and 1.85± 8.78μm between UP and OCT (P=0.067). All three methods of CCT measurement were closely correlated with each other.

CONCLUSION

The present study results suggest that, despite good agreement between the three devices, AL-Scan significantly underestimated CCT compared to UP and OCT. Therefore, clinicians should be aware that different results can be obtained using different devices for CCT measurements. It would be a better approach not to use them as interchangeable in clinical practice. CCT examination and follow-up should be performed using the same device, especially for patients who will undergo refractive surgery.

[Outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy]

PURPOSE

While endothelial keratoplasty has become the standard treatment for Fuchs dystrophy, the strategy for first-line surgery in patients with associated cataract is still debated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of eyes with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) undergoing phacoemulsification alone, to ascertain preoperative factors that predict the need for endothelial keratoplasty (EK).

METHODS

Single-center retrospective study. Cataract surgery alone was performed in 64 eyes of 50 patients with FECD. This decision was made if the patient did not have morning blur, the central corneal thickness (CCT) was below 630 microns, and endothelial cells were visible in the periphery.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 21 months (range 5-55 months). The mean preoperative CCT was 571±43μm. 6 months after surgery, it was 584±52μm (P=0.12). During follow-up, 14 eyes (22%) required an EK because of poor visual outcome after cataract surgery alone. Mean pre-operative CCT of these eyes (595±23μm) was significantly higher than eyes that did not require EK during follow-up (564±45μm, P=0.022). Over 570 microns, 34% of eyes required an endothelial keratoplasty after the cataract surgery alone.

CONCLUSIONS

CCT below 630μm associated with the absence of morning blur are preoperative criteria allowing 78.1% eyes with FECD to obtain good visual outcomes after cataract surgery alone. In these eyes, EK can therefore be avoided while ensuring good results.

Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Tono-pachymetry and Ultrasound Pachymetry

Purpose: We compared the accuracy of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements according to CCT measured by noncontact Tono-pachymetry and ultrasound pachymetry (USP). Methods: CCT was measured in 90 eyes of 90 subjects by two optometrists. The CCT measurements were compared and the correlations between the measurements were analyzed. To evaluate whether the measurements varied depending on CCT, the subjects were classified into three groups according to CCT (group 1: thin thickness group; group 2: medium thickness group; and group 3: thick thickness group). The differences in CCT obtained by the two devices (△CCT = Tono-pachymetry-USP) were compared and analyzed among the three groups. Results: The average CCT measurements by Tono-pachymetry and USP were 523.26 ± 32.93 μm and 527.08 ± 37.33 μm, respectively. CCT by Tono-pachymetry was significantly thinner than by USP (△CCT= -3.82 ± 15.34, p = 0.020). The two measurements were strongly correlated (r = 0.912, p < 0.001). The △CCT values were 5.40 ± 12.13 μm in group 1, -6.37 ± 15.07 μm in group 2, and -10.50 ± 14.39 μm in group 3 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: CCT measured by tono-pachymetry was thinner on average compared to the value measured by USP and the differences in measurements between the two devices were different according to CCT. The thinner the CCT, the thicker the measurement, and the thicker the CCT, the thinner the measurement. Therefore, this trend should be considered when interpreting tono- pachymetry results in clinical practice.

To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained by Pentacam with those obtained by IOLMaster 700, Cirrus anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Tomey specular microscopy in normal healthy eyes

Purpose:

To compare central corneal thickness measurements obtained by Pentacam with those obtained by IOL Master 700, Cirrus Anterior segment optical coherence tomography and Tomey Specular microscopy in normal healthy eyes.

Methods:

Two hundred and six eyes of healthy subjects were included in the study. Each subject was assessed by four different methods of measuring central corneal thickness using Pentacam, IOL Master 700, Cirrus AS-OCT and Tomey Specular microscopy by a single examiner.

Results:

The mean CCT [± standard deviation (SD)] for Pentacam, IOL Master 700, Cirrus AS-OCT and Tomey Specular microscopy were Pentacam (Oculus), AS-OCT (Cirrus), IOL Master 700 and Specular microscopy (Tomey) were 523.75 (±27.75), 525.29 (±28.81),517.13 (±28.43) and 512.82 (±27.60) μm, respectively. All the means were significantly different from one another (P < 0.000). The differences between pairs of mean central corneal thickness (CCT) for Pentacam and IOL Master, Pentacam and anterior segment- optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), and Pentacam and Specular microscopy are statistically significant. Bland–Altman plots showed that pentacam and IOL Master 700 have the closest agreement, followed by AS-OCT. Specular microscopy was found to have the poorest agreement with Pentacam.

Conclusion:

We found that CCT measurements of Pentacam did not correlate with measurements of IOL Master, or AS-OCT or Specular microscopy. In clinical practice, the devices analyzed should not be used interchangeably due to low agreement regarding CCT values.

In Vivo Characterization of Corneal Changes in a Type 1 Diabetic Animal Model

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disease that affects 9% of the adult population, promoting an increase in glucose concentration that affects the corneal structure, namely, its thickness, as well as the constituents and flow of the aqueous humor. In this study, high-frequency transducers (20-MHz and 50-MHz) were used to measure and characterize changes in the corneal and aqueous humor in streptozotocin-induced type 1 diabetic rats followed over 8 weeks. Increases of 24.6 and 15.4 μm in central corneal thickness were measured with the 20-MHz and 50-MHz probes, respectively, in DM rats (p < 0.001). The increases in thickness of the different corneal layers ranged from 7% to 17%. Structural alterations of the aqueous humor were also studied by relating the amplitudes of the anterior lens and posterior cornea boundary signals, the result of which was denominated by pseudo-attenuation. The results revealed an increase of 49% at week 8 compared with the baseline values (p < 0.020, with the 50-MHz probe). This study illustrated that high-frequency ultrasound can be used to measure corneal layer thickness and study the alterations promoted by diabetes in the eye's anterior segment. Those assessments may allow early detection of DM, improving the monitoring of diabetic patients.

Comparison between a New Optical Biometry Device and an Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomographer for Measuring Central Corneal Thickness and Anterior Chamber Depth

Purpose. To compare between a new optical biometer (AL-Scan, Nidek Co., Aichi, Japan) and an anterior segment optical coherence tomographer (Visante AS-OCT, Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin, USA) for measuring central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and aqueous depth (AD). Methods. Sixty-three eyes of 63 normal subjects were examined with AL-Scan and Visante AS-OCT in this prospective study. One eye per subject was measured three times with both devices to record their CCT, ACD, and AD. All procedures were performed by the same operator. Agreement between the two devices was assessed using paired t-tests, Bland-Altman plots, and 95% limits of agreement (LoA). Results. The mean CCT, ACD, and AD measured by AL-Scan were 538.59 ± 27.37 μm, 3.70 ± 0.30 mm, and 3.16 ± 0.30 mm, respectively. The mean values obtained by the Visante OCT were 536.14 ± 26.61 μm for CCT, 3.71 ± 0.29 mm for ACD, and 3.17 ± 0.29 mm for AD. The mean CCT by the AL-Scan was higher than that obtained by the Visante AS-OCT (difference = 2.45 ± 6.07 μm, P < 0.05). The differences in ACD and AD measurements were not statistically significant. The 95% LoA of CCT, ACD, and AD were between -9.44 and 14.35 μm, -0.15 and 0.12 mm, and -0.15 and 0.12 mm, respectively. Conclusions. Since these two devices were comparable for measuring CCT, ACD, and AD, their results can be interchangeably used in the clinic.

Central corneal thickness determination in corneal edema using ultrasound pachymetry, a Scheimpflug camera, and anterior segment OCT

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of post-surgical corneal edema on the reliability and reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam), ultrasound pachymetry (USP), and anterior-segment spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT).

METHODS

Thirty-two patients planned for cataract surgery (n = 16) or vitrectomy (n =  6) were included in a prospective study. The non-surgery eye was used as control. Two investigators acquired two measurements each, with the Pentacam (Oculus, Germany) and the AS-OCT (Heidelberg Engineering, Germany) in a randomized order, followed by USP (Tomey SP-100, Germany). CCT was evaluated using the apex value for Pentacam, the corneal apex cut in AS-OCT and averaging eight single measurements for USP. Coefficients of variation (COV) and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were determined.

RESULTS

Post-surgery corneas showed a thickness of (investigators 1 and 2): Pentacam (615.9 ± 58.02 μm and 615.1 ± 60.17 μm), USP (601.4 ± 63.77 μm and 614.5 ± 70.91 μm), AS-OCT (608.8 ± 65.67 μm and 606.9 ± 64.41 μm) ,with no significant difference (ANOVA p > 0.99). The COVs (investigators 1 and 2) for control eyes were: Pentacam (0.78 ± 0.52 and 0.70 ± 0.76), USP (0.66 ± 0.29 and 0.98 ± 0.44), AS-OCT (0.59 ± 0.61 and 0.59 ± 0.40). The COVs (investigators 1 and 2) for post-surgical eyes were: Pentacam (0.98 ± 1.25 and 0.97 ± 0.73), USP (0.73 ± 0.64 and 1.35 ± 0.85), AS-OCT (1.34 ± 1.57 and 1.19 ± 1.18).The ICC was determined in post-surgery corneas (ICC > 0.96) and control corneas (ICC > 0.95).

CONCLUSION

USP measurements have the highest user dependence. Post-surgical corneal edema leads to higher intraobserver variability. All methods reached a high level of agreement in CCT determination in edematous as well as healthy corneas.

Accutome PachPen handheld ultrasonic pachymeter: intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reproducibility by personnel of different training grades

To assess the intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements of PachPen (Accutome, Inc., Pennsylvania, USA), a hand-held, portable ultrasonic pachymeter when used by an ophthalmic nurse compared to an ophthalmologist. Ophthalmology Clinic, University of Malaya Medical Center In this prospective study, CCT was measured in 184 eyes of 92 healthy subjects, first by a corneal surgeon experienced in ultrasound pachymetry (Observer 1) followed by an ophthalmic nurse new to the procedure (Observer 2). Nine measurements were obtained from each eye by each observer, independently. Measurements were compared between the observers. Coefficients of repeatability and reproducibility were calculated. The Bland-Altman plot was used to assess agreement between observers. Mean age of the study population was 54.3 ± 15.2 years old and consisted of 43.5% male. Mean CCT as measured by Observers 1 and 2 were 528.3 ± 32.9 and 530.7 ± 33.3 µm, respectively. Observer 1 showed higher repeatability of measurements compared to that of Observer 2 (coefficient of repeatability 3.46 vs. 5.55%). The measurements by both observers showed high correlation (0.96) and good agreement (mean difference -2.4 µm; 95% limits of agreement -21.4, 16.7 µm). Coefficient of reproducibility of measurements between observers was 5.08%. Accutome PachPen hand-held ultrasound pachymeters gives excellent intra-observer repeatability and inter-observer reproducibility by personnel of different training grades.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by hand-held and desk-mounted ultrasound pachymeters in glaucoma patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and reproducibility of central corneal thickness measured by hand-held and desk-mounted ultrasound pachymeter in glaucoma patients under treatment.

METHODS

Prospective study of 65 glaucoma patients. Central corneal thickness was measured by two ultrasound pachymeters: the hand-held, portable PachPen (Accutome, Lynwood, WA), and the desk-mounted PacScan 300 (Sonomed, Lake Success, NY).

RESULTS

The mean ± SD central corneal thickness was 526.5 ± 44.8 µm and 530.0 ± 44.7 µm for the hand-held and desk-mounted pachymeters, respectively (p = 0.15). Linear regression analysis revealed a slope of 0.97 with Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.96. Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference of measurements by both pachymeters of 3.22 µm with two standard deviations = 9.51. Both instruments showed high intraobserver correlation: 0.972 for the hand-held pachymeter and 0.993 for the desk-mounted pachymeter.

CONCLUSION

Central corneal thickness measurements were comparable with the use of hand-held and desk-mounted ultrasound units in glaucoma patients with good intraobserver reproducibility.

Anterior segment parameters measured with 2 optical devices compared to ultrasonic data

PURPOSE

Ophthalmic parameters can be measured with different techniques and devices. Our aim was to measure anterior segment parameters using 2 optical devices and to compare the data to ultrasonic technique.

METHODS

Axial length (AL) was measured with IOLMaster; anterior chamber depth (ACD) was determined using IOLMaster, Visante® optical coherence tomography (OCT), and Pentacam® HR; and central corneal thickness (CCT) were measured with Pentacam® HR and with ultrasound.

RESULTS

In 45 eyes of 45 patients (age 62.73±15.31), the AL was 23.35±1.49 mm. The CCT was 541.7±39.9 µm with Visante OCT, 549.7±39.2 µm with Pentacam® HR, and 534.3±41.3 µm with ultrasonic device. The ACD was 3.0±0.42 mm with IOLMaster, 3.26±0.95 mm with Visante OCT, and 3.06±0.41 mm with Pentacam® HR. In case of CCT measurements, data obtained with Pentacam HR correlated with the results of ultrasonic measurements (r=0.89; p<0.001) and Visante OCT measurements (r=0.88; p<0.001). Regarding ACD results, a significant correlation was observed between Pentacam HR and IOLMaster (r=0.95; p<0.0001) but they did not significantly correlate to Visante OCT data (r=0.23; p=0.12). Correlation was significant between AL and ACD measured with IOLMaster (r=0.67; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The CCT and ACD data show strong correlation between different devices.

Intraobserver reliability of contact pachymetry in children

BACKGROUND

Central corneal thickness (CCT) is an important measurement in the treatment and management of pediatric glaucoma and potentially of refractive error, but data regarding reliability of CCT measurement in children are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of CCT measurement with the use of handheld contact pachymetry in children.

METHODS

We conducted a multicenter intraobserver test-retest reliability study of more than 3,400 healthy eyes in children aged from newborn to 17 years by using a handheld contact pachymeter (Pachmate DGH55; DGH Technology Inc, Exton, PA) in 2 clinical settings--with the use of topical anesthesia in the office and with the patient under general anesthesia in a surgical facility.

RESULTS

The overall standard error of measurement, including only measurements with standard deviation ≤5 μm, was 8 μm; the corresponding coefficient of repeatability, or limits within which 95% of test-retest differences fell, was ±22.3 μm. However, standard error of measurement increased as CCT increased, from 6.8 μm for CCT less than 525 μm, to 12.9 μm for CCT 625 μm and greater. The standard error of measurement including measurements with standard deviation >5 μm was 10.5 μm. Age, sex, race/ethnicity group, and examination setting did not influence the magnitude of test-retest differences.

CONCLUSIONS

CCT measurement reliability in children via the Pachmate DGH55 handheld contact pachymeter is similar to that reported for adults. Because thicker CCT measurements are less reliable than thinner measurements, a second measure may be helpful when the first exceeds 575 μm. Reliability is also improved by disregarding measurements with instrument-reported standard deviations >5 μm.

Repeatability and agreement of CCT measurement in myopia using entacam and ultrasound pachymetry

AIM

To evaluate the repeatability of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement by entacam, and agreement of CCT measured by Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry (USP) in Chinese myopia. Thereby investigate the possibility of Pentacam as a substitute for USP in CCT measurement before refractive surgery. The effects of corneal curvature measured by Pentacam on CCT were also evaluated.

METHODS

One hundred and forty-eight right eyes of 148 individual with myopia were included in this study. Three successive Pentacam CCT measurements followed by 10 successive ultrasound pachymetry were carried out in the 148 eyes. Mean of CCT taken by each device was calculated for comparison. According to the CCT measured by USP, all the 148 eyes were divided into 3 groups: <520µm, 520-560µm, >560µm. For all eyes and each group the CCT obtained by Pentacam and USP were compared. Anterior corneal curvature of the 148 eyes was also adopted for correlation analysis with CCT obtained by ultrasound pachymetry. In addition, CCT measurement using 60 random selected Scheimpflug images was performed by 3 skilled investigators at different time, and this was repeated for 3 times by a forth investigator to assess repeatability of Pentacam CCT measurement using Scheimpflug images.

RESULTS

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis revealed high intraobserver repeatability (ICC=0.994, F=158.60, P<0.001) for CCT measurement by Pentacam. The interobserver (ICC=0.998, F=494.73, P<0.001) and intraobserver (ICC=0.997, F=383.98, P<0.001) repeatability for Pentacam CCT measurements using Scheimpflug images were also excellent. There was high positive correlation between the CCT values measured by Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry (r=0.963, P<0.001). Bland-altman plots showed that the Pentacam underestimate the CCT by 8.02µm compared with ultrasouond pachymetry. The differences between Pentacam and USP increased as the CCT readings by USP increased (Pentacam vs USP: slope=-0.04, P<0.05). The 95% upper and lower limits of agreement between CCT values obtained from the two devices were +9.33µm and -25.37µm. No significant association could be found between CCT and anterior corneal curvature.

CONCLUSION

Inter- and intraobserver variability for CCT measurements by Pentacam was considerably below clinically significant levels. CCT of myopia obtained by Scheimpflug camera, Pentacam, were highly correlated to that by ultrasound pachymetry. However, the values obtained are not directly interchangeable between Pentacam and ultrasound pachymetry as the 95% limits of agreement are relatively wide. Pentacam can be a useful instrument for measuring CCT in candidates to refractive surgery in clinic.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements using ultrasound pachymetry, ultrasound biomicroscopy, and the Artemis-2 VHF scanner in normal eyes

Purpose

To compare the precision of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements taken with the handheld ultrasound pachymeter (USP), ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM), and the Artemis-2 very high frequency ultrasound scanner (VHFUS) on normal subjects.

Design

Prospective study.

Methods

One eye from each of 61 normal subjects was randomly selected for this study. The measurements of the CCT were taken with the USP, VHFUS, and UBM. Results were compared statistically using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and limits of agreement.

Results

The average CCT (± standard deviation) was 530.1 ± 30.5 μm, 554.9 ± 31.7 μm, and 559.5 ± 30.7 μm for UBM, VHFUS, and USP respectively. The intraobserver repeatability analyses of variance are not significant for USP, UBM, and VHFUS. P-values were 0.17, 0.19, and 0.37 respectively. Repeated-measures ANOVA showed a significant difference between the three different methods of measuring CCT (P = 0.0001). The ANOVA test revealed no statistically significant difference between USP and VHFUS (P > 0.05), yet statistical significant differences with UBM versus USP and UBM versus VHFUS (P < 0.001). There were high correlations between the three instruments (P < 0.0001). The mean differences (and upper/lower limits of agreement) for CCT measurements were 29.4 ± 14.3 (2.7/56), 4.6 ± 8.6 (−14.7/23.8), and −24.8 ± 13.1 (−50.4/0.8) for USP versus UBM, USP versus VHFUS, and UBM versus VHFUS, respectively.

Conclusion

The UBM produces CCT measurements that vary significantly from those returned by the USP and the VHFUS, suggesting that the UBM may not be used interchangeably with either equipment for monitoring the CCT in the clinical setting.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements by Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes

PURPOSE

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements taken with Pentacam, noncontact specular microscope (NCSM), and ultrasound pachymetry (US) in normal and post-laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) eyes and to assess the agreement between the three devices.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured in 94 eyes of normal volunteer and in 72 eyes of post-LASIK patients. Measurements were made with the three devices.

RESULTS

In normal eyes, the mean (±SD) CCT taken with Pentacam, NCSM, and US was 552.6 ± 36.8 μm, 511.9 ± 38.6 μm, and 533.3 ± 37.9 μm, respectively. The average values of CCT taken with the three instruments were significantly different. In post-LASIK eyes the mean CCT with Pentacam, NCSM, and US was 483.02 ± 6.03 μm, 450.7 ± 5.3 μm, and 469.5 ± 5.8 μm, respectively. The average values of CCT taken were significantly different for Pentacam vs. NCSM (P = 0.046) and Pentacam vs. US (P = 0.02), but not significant for NCSM vs. US (P = 0.352). The Bland and Altman method for assessing clinical agreement between 3 instruments showed that in normal eyes, the mean values and paired differences of the three CCT devices were found to be statistically independent. In post-LASIK eyes, there was significant association between the difference and the mean of the Pentacam and NCSM, and US and NCSM.

CONCLUSION

The three devices cannot be used interchangeably in normal and post-LASIK eyes. Pentacam tends to give significantly thicker reading than ultrasound pachymetry.

Effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measured with three different tonometers

PURPOSE

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by a Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), a noncontact tonometer (NCT), and a portable noncontact tonometer (PNCT) in eyes of healthy volunteers, and to determine if a significant correlation exists between the IOP and the central corneal thickness (CCT).

METHODS

A total of 144 healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of two groups; in the first group, IOP was measured first with the NCT and then with the GAT. In the second group, IOP was measured first with the PNCT and then with the GAT. Subsequently, the CCT of all subjects was measured with an ultrasonic pachymeter.

RESULTS

The IOPs determined by the GAT and NCT and were strongly correlated, as were those determined by the GAT and PNCT, in both groups. However, a Bland-Altman plot showed that the correlations between the GAT and NCT and between the GAT and the PNCT measurements were not significant. With all three instruments, the IOP readings varied with the CCT. The mean IOPs obtained with the GAT increased by 0.23 mmHg with each 10-microm increase in CCT (0.23 mmHg/10 microm). The comparable value for the NCT was 0.29 mmHg/10 microm, and that for the PNCT was 0.31 mmHg/10 microm.

CONCLUSIONS

For measurements of IOP in normal eyes, the GAT is the tonometer least affected by the CCT, compared with the PNCT and NCT. A PNCT is more likely to be affected by variations in CCT than the GAT.

Central corneal thickness measured by the Orbscan II system, contact ultrasound pachymetry, and the Artemis 2 system

PURPOSE

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements by the Orbscan II device, contact ultrasound (US) pachymetry, and the noncontact Artemis 2 scanning US system.

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.

METHODS

The CCT in 40 eyes (20 normal subjects) was measured by the Orbscan II followed by contact US pachymetry and then the Artemis 2. Results were compared using analysis of variance (ANOVA), paired t tests, and Bland-Altman plots.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in CCT measurements between the 3 modes (F = 32.84, P = .0001, 1-way ANOVA). Artemis 2 and US pachymetry measurements were highly correlated (r2 = 0.963, P < .0001), although Artemis 2 values were a mean of 11.2 microm +/- 6.6 (SD) thinner than pachymetry values. Artemis 2 and Orbscan II measurements were less well correlated (r2 = 0.851, P < .001); Orbscan II values were a mean of 7.5 +/- 15.7 microm thinner than Artemis 2 values. Orbscan II values showed a trend toward increasing underestimation of CCT in thinner corneas.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound pachymetry and Artemis 2 CCT measurements were highly correlated; the 11 microm mean difference in measurements may be attributed to decentration, oblique incidence of the probe to the cornea, or possibly the effect of topical anesthesia with contact pachymetry. Although the mean difference between Orbscan II and Artemis 2 values was 7.5 microm, Orbscan values were less correlated than Artemis 2 values with contact US pachymetry and were prone to underestimation of the CCT in thinner corneas.

Contact lens-induced corneal peripheral swelling differences with extended wear

PURPOSE

To compare central and peripheral corneal swelling with high-Dk (lotrafilcon A) and low-Dk (etafilcon A) contact lenses (CLs) during extended wear (EW).

METHODS

Corneal thickness was measured in 5 corneal locations (central, superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal) with Orbscan II pachymetry 1 week before the wearing of CLs and after 1 week of EW. High-Dk (lotrafilcon A) and low-Dk (etafilcon A) soft CLs were randomly fitted for EW in the right and left eyes of 20 subjects with normal ocular health. Orbscan was also performed before CL removal after 3 and 7 days of EW.

RESULTS

Lotrafilcon A induced a lower percentage of corneal swelling in all 5 corneal locations than etafilcon A (P < 0.05, paired t test). Lotrafilcon A swelling percentages were as follows: central (1.67% +/- 2.22%), superior (2.04% +/- 3.25%), inferior (1.38% +/- 1.74%), nasal (1.50% +/- 2.00%), and temporal (1.27% +/- 1.47%). Etafilcon A swelling percentages were as follows: central (4.98% +/- 3.07%), superior (6.62% +/- 8.39%), inferior (5.24% +/- 5.54%), nasal (3.41% +/- 3.14%), and temporal (4.46% +/- 3.32%). Differences between the central and peripheral corneal swelling during EW of both types of lenses were not significant (P > 0.05, repeated-measures analysis of variance).

CONCLUSIONS

Central and peripheral corneal thicknesses increase more with etafilcon A than with lotrafilcon A during EW, as measured by Orbscan pachymetry.

Central corneal thickness in Northwestern American Indians/Alaskan Natives and comparison with White and African-American persons

PURPOSE

To determine the demographic factors associated with central corneal thickness (CCT) in Northwestern American Indians/Alaskan Natives (AI/ANs) and to compare these CCT measurements with those of White and African-American persons.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparative, observational study.

METHODS

We performed ultrasonic pachymetry (DGH-500 Pachette; DGH Technologies, Exton, Pennsylvania, USA) on a random sample of AI/AN subjects from three randomly selected AI/AN tribes in the Northwest United States (n = 429). Pachymetry also was performed on a convenience sample of White (n = 46) and African-American (n = 33) persons. Our main outcome measure was the average of right and left eye CCT.

RESULTS

Average AI/AN CCT was 554.8 +/- 33.9 microm. AI/AN CCT was found to be thicker than that of African Americans (528.5 +/- 33.2 microm) but similar to that of White persons (551.9 +/- 28.3 microm). CCT was greater in AI/AN females than in AI/AN males (557.6 +/- 33.3 microm vs 550.1 +/- 34.5 microm; P = .03). We found no difference in CCT based on percent AI/AN heritage, age, and keratometry readings. We found no significant differences in mean CCT between AI/ANs with glaucoma (556.2 microm) and those who did not have glaucoma (556.6 microm).

CONCLUSIONS

CCT measurements for the Northwest AI/AN population are similar to those of White persons but thicker than those of African-American persons. Although glaucoma is common in AI/ANs, we did not find an association with thin CCT. We need future studies to explore the risk factors for glaucoma in AI/ANs.

Agreement and repeatability of the Sonogage ultrasound pachometer compared with a Mitutoyo micrometer

PURPOSE

The agreement and repeatability of the Sonogage ultrasound pachometer was tested by comparing it with a Mitutoyo micrometer.

METHODS

The thickness of five polymacon disks with thickness and ultrasonic properties similar to the human cornea and corneal epithelium were measured using both instruments. The mean values obtained using both instruments were compared and analyzed using a two-way analysis of variance, Bland-Altman analysis, and coefficient of variation.

RESULTS

The measurements of the Sonogage were found to be statistically indistinguishable from the micrometer for all disks combined (p = 0.25) and for the disks with thicknesses similar to the corneal epithelium (p = 0.10), Bland-Altman analysis reveal limits of agreement for all thicknesses with a lower limit of -4.23 microm and upper limit of 5.27 microm. The coefficient of variation was <4% for each thickness. Bland-Altman plots of thin and thick disks exhibit no systematic difference between the average micrometer and Sonogage measurements.

CONCLUSION

The measurements taken with the Sonogage pachometer are comparable with those taken with the micrometer when measuring polymacon disks with properties similar to corneal epithelium and total corneal thickness.

Agreement among 3 Methods to Measure Corneal Thickness: Ultrasound Pachymetry, Orbscan II, and Visante Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography

PURPOSE

To assess the agreement of central and paracentral corneal thickness measurements between ultrasound pachymetry (USP), Orbscan II, and Visante anterior segment optical coherence tomography (ASOCT).

DESIGN

Observational cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy eyes of 70 subjects.

METHODS

Each subject underwent Orbscan II (using an acoustic equivalent correction factor of 0.89), ASOCT, and USP examination. Bland-Altman plots were used to evaluate agreement between instruments.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Central and paracentral corneal thickness measurements by the 3 methods and agreement, as evaluated by 95% limits of agreement (LOA).

RESULTS

The mean measurements of average central corneal thickness by USP, Orbscan II, and ASOCT were 553.5+/-30.26 microm, 553.22+/-25.47 microm, and 538.79+/-26.22 microm, respectively. There was high correlation between instruments: USP with ASOCT (r = 0.936, P<0.001), USP with Orbscan II (r = 0.900, P<0.001) for central corneal thickness measurements, and Orbscan II with ASOCT for average paracentral 2- to 5-mm measurements (r = 0.947, P<0.001). The mean differences (and upper/lower LOA) for central corneal thickness measurements were 0.31+/-13.34 microm (26.44/-25.83) between USP and Orbscan II, 14.74+/-10.84 microm (36.0/-6.51) between USP and ASOCT, and 14.44+/-9.14 microm (32.36/-3.48) between Orbscan II and ASOCT. The average mean difference (and upper/lower LOA) between Orbscan II and ASOCT for paracentral 2- to 5-mm corneal thickness measurements was 10.35+/-8.67 microm (27.35/-6.65).

CONCLUSION

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography underestimated corneal thickness compared with that measured with USP. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography had better agreement with the gold standard USP, as compared with Orbscan II. However, important discrepancies among instruments exist. Clinicians should be aware that corneal thickness measurements are influenced by the method of measurement and that, although highly correlated, these instruments should not be used interchangeably for the assessment of corneal thickness.

Central Corneal Thickness

PURPOSE

To compare the repeatability and validity of corneal pachymetry by a corneal confocal microscope with a z-axis adapter (Confoscan 4.0 with z-ring adapter: z-CS4) versus ultrasound (US) pachymetry in the measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT).

METHODS

CCT in 44 eyes of 44 subjects was determined with z-CS4. Z-CS4 exams were used to estimate the repeatability of thickness measurement by z-ring adapter for this confocal microscope. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between two different z-CS4 users was also determined. CCT in the same 44 eyes was determined with US pachymetry and measurements were compared with z-CS4 CCT.

RESULTS

Z-CS4 CCT showed high intrainstrument reproducibility (ICC = 0.989; 95%CI 0.982-0.993; P < 0.0001). Mean difference among three CCT consecutive measures, in the same eye, was 0.8 +/- 11.1 microm. High correlation was found between two users (ICC = 0.896; 95%IC 0.830-0.937; P < 0.0001). Z-CS4 CCT showed high correlation with US pachymetry (ICC = 0.921; 95%CI 0.851-0.958; P < 0.0001). Mean corneal thickness determined was statistically different with the two methods (US: 512.6 +/- 65.8 microm; z-CS4: 487.8 +/- 60.1 microm; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Z-CS4 seems an accurate, noninvasive and reproducible technique for CCT evaluation and confirms that central cornea is thinner when measured with confocal microscopy compared to ultrasounds.

Ultrasound and Partial Coherence Interferometry With Measurement of Central Corneal Thickness

PURPOSE

To compare noncontact pachymeter measurements with ultrasound pachymeter measurements and assess their reproducibility.

METHODS

Central corneal thickness was measured in 104 eyes of 56 patients with three laser interference pachymeters (OLCR [Haag Streit, Könitz, Switzerland], OCP [4optics AG, Lübeck, Germany], and ACMaster [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany]) and an ultrasound pachymeter (Tomey AL2000 [Tomey Corp, Nagoya, Japan]).

RESULTS

Compared to the ultrasound measurements, the mean difference for the laser interference pachymeter measurements were +8.8 microm (standard deviation [SD] 5.68) for the OLCR, -8.0 microm (SD 5.39) for the OCP, and -0.12 microm (SD 5.88) for the ACMaster. Reproducibility could only be estimated as not all of the devices allowed access to individual measurements. For all laser interference devices, reproducibility was estimated to be approximately 2 microm. Ultrasound measurements yielded a reproducibility of approximately 3.4 microm.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ultrasound pachymeter measurements differed significantly from OLCR and OCP measurements, agreement was considered good because the mean differences were <10 microm, and the results can be regarded as clinically interchangeable.

Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with a new optical device and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter

PURPOSE

To compare central corneal thickness (CCT) values obtained with ultrasonic pachymetry and a new optical method using partial coherence interferometry (PCI).

SETTING

Department of Ophthalmology, Medical Health and Science Center, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

METHODS

The study comprised 136 eyes of 70 patients whose spherical refractive error was not greater than +/-6.0 diopters (D) and whose keratometric astigmatism was not greater than 2.0 D. Central corneal thickness was measured 5 times with a new optical device (ACMaster, Zeiss) and with an ultrasonic pachymeter (AL-2000, Tomey). All measurements were obtained by the same investigator.

RESULTS

Mean CCT was 531.2 microm +/- 3.9 (SD) with PCI and 547.8 +/- 36.0 microm with the ultrasonic device. The difference between groups was significant (P = .001). There was no difference between CCT values measured in right and left eyes (P = .55) with ultrasonography and PCI (P = .67). The coefficient variation was 0.73% for PCI and 6.5% for ultrasonography. Correlation between the CCT measurements with both devices was strong and statistically significant (Spearman correlation = .91, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Mean CCT values measured by the PCI method were significantly smaller than those measured by the ultrasonic device. Central corneal thickness measured with PCI is more reproducible and seems to be more reliable than that measured by ultrasonography.

The effect of flap thickness on the visual and refractive outcome of myopic laser in situ keratomileusis

AIMS

To study the effect of flap thickness on the visual and refractive outcome of myopic laser in situkeratomileusis (LASIK) surgery.

METHODS

A total of 196 myopic eyes with spherical equivalent (SE) from -2.00 to -5.00 dioptres which underwent LASIK were studied retrospectively. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and manifest refraction were measured up to 6 months postoperatively. Logistic and linear regression analyses were used to examine the correlation of flap thickness to visual and refractive outcomes, postoperative complications and enhancement rate.

RESULTS

UCVA at 1 week and 1 month, but not at 1 day and at 6 months (P>0.05), were negatively correlated to flap thickness (P<0.05). BCVA was unrelated to flap thickness (P>0.05). At 1-month post-LASIK sphere and cylinder were not related to flap thickness (P>0.05), but spherical equivalent was negatively correlated (P<0.05). Significant negative correlations with the sphere and SE were noticed at 6 months for the eyes not requiring enhancements (P<0.05). Flap thickness had no significant relationship to postoperative complications (P>0.05) and no significant predictive value on the rate of enhancement procedures or the efficacy, safety and predictability indices (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In myopic LASIK thinner flaps are associated with faster visual recovery and less myopic SE, but the BCVA and the final UCVA are independent of flap thickness. Postoperative complications are unrelated to flap thickness. Flap thickness does not affect the efficacy, safety and predictability, or the rate of enhancement procedures.

Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Clinical Practice

OBJECTIVE

To determine if a single measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) is an adequate sample to aid in glaucoma risk assessment in clinical practice.

METHODS

Central corneal thickness was measured by ultrasound pachymetry (mean of 15 measurements for each eye) on two separate occasions at least one month apart (range, 33 to 610 days). Eyes with a history of prior incisional surgery or corneal pathology were excluded.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight eyes of 98 patients (43 male, 55 female) were enrolled. Mean age was 61.2 +/- 15.5 years. Mean inter-test period was 276 +/- 124 days. No significant difference in mean CCT was observed between the two visits (549 +/- 41 microm versus 548 +/- 42 microm, P = 0.4, two-tailed, paired t test). Measured CCT values differed by more than 20 microm in 20 eyes (20.4%), whereas CCT difference of at least 40 microm was seen in 5 eyes (5.1%). There was no correlation between the measured or absolute difference in CCT and IOP (r = -0.016, P > 0.43), inter-test time period (r = 0.072, P > 0.23), and glaucoma diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Central corneal thickness measurements in this study differed by at least 20 microm in 20% of eyes. This has important implications for risk assessment, management, and follow-up of patients with glaucoma and related disorders. Factors affecting CCT measurement, such as examiner error or true alterations in corneal thickness, require continued investigation.

Repeatability and Reproducibility of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement With Pentacam, Orbscan, and Ultrasound

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained with a novel rotating Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam; Oculus) with scanning slit topography (Orbscan; Bausch & Lomb), and with ultrasound pachymetry (SP-2000; Tomey).

METHODS

CCT in 30 healthy eyes was measured twice with each modality by 2 independent observers in random order. The results from scanning slit topography are given both with and without multiplication with the "acoustic correction factor" of 0.92. In addition, the displayed images from the rotating Scheimpflug camera and scanning slit topography were used to calculate the signal difference-to-noise ratios (SD/N) between cornea and background signal.

RESULTS

The mean CCT values as determined with the different modalities (+/-standard deviation) were: 542+/-29 microm, 576+/-37 microm, 530+/-34 microm, and 552+/-32 microm for rotating Scheimpflug imaging, for uncorrected and for corrected scanning slit pachymetry, and for ultrasound, respectively. The differences between modalities (+/-95% limits of agreement) were -9.8+/-31 microm between rotating Scheimpflug and ultrasound, 24+/-31.2 microm between scanning slit and ultrasound, and 33+/-27 microm between scanning slit and rotating Scheimpflug imaging. The limits of agreement for within and between observer effects were within 4.2% of the absolute CCT values for scanning slit and ultrasound and within 2.2% for the rotating Scheimpflug imaging. The rotating Scheimpflug camera showed similar SD/N ratios but steeper edges of the corneal surfaces in the intensity profile plots.

CONCLUSION

In the assessment of normal corneas, the Pentacam measured CCT values closer to ultrasound pachymetry and with less variability compared with Orbscan. The (interobserver) reproducibility with the Pentacam was highest of all 3 modalities.

Glaukomdiagnostik und Hornhautdicke

In recent years the role of pachymetry in the correction of applanation tonometry values was controversially disputed. At the present time it is undoubtedly proven that central corneal thickness affects the accuracy of applanation tonometry. The dimension of this influence is 1 mmHg of pressure per 25 microm of change in corneal thickness. It is important to remember that Goldmann and Schmidt calibrated the applanation tonometer according to the central corneal thickness of their population by using the optical method. Therefore, it is first necessary to determine the corneal thickness for each examiner and his methods. The linear correction formula should be used only in the range of corneal thickness in which the formula was determined. The correction according to Orssengo and Pye and further developments in tonometry may offer alternatives for better estimation of intraocular pressure.

Corneal Flap Measurements in Laser in situ Keratomileusis Using the Moria M2 Automated Microkeratome

PURPOSE

To evaluate accuracy and predictability and factors that influence the dimensions of the laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) corneal flap created with the Moria M2 automated microkeratome (Moria SA, Antony, France).

METHODS

The flap thickness of 454 eyes of 243 consecutive patients was measured using subtraction ultrasonic pachymetry during LASIK with the Moria M2 microkeratome head 130 designed to create a 160-microm-thick flap. Flap dimensions were evaluated and measurements were correlated with preoperative parameters. A stepwise regression analysis was used to determine the factors that influenced actual flap thickness.

RESULTS

The preoperative spherical equivalent refraction of the 454 eyes ranged from -12.125 diopters (D) to +6.25 D. Patient age ranged from 18 to 57 years (mean age: 31.3 +/- 8.8 years). Mean preoperative keratometric power K1 was 44.31 +/- 1.59 D and K2 was 43.32 +/- 1.54 D. Mean preoperative central comeal thickness was 552.4 +/- 32.5 microm (range: 466 to 665 microm). With an attempted thickness of 160 microm, the Moria M2 flap thickness ranged from 77 to 209 microm (mean: 153.3 +/- 19.0 microm). Mean horizontal flap diameter was 9.2 +/- 0.2 mm and mean hinge length 4.6 +/- 0.3 mm. Increasing flap thickness was found to correlate with increasing preoperative comeal thickness, younger patient age, and flatter preoperative keratometric power K1.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the standard deviation of the flap thickness was relatively small, remarkable individual variation was noted. Therefore, the intraoperative calculation of the remaining stromal bed is recommended. Furthermore, the consideration of central corneal thickness, patient age, and preoperative keratometry are helpful parameters to avoid too deep ablation.

Corneal flap thickness and topography changes induced by flap creation during laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To determine the corneal flap thickness profile produced by 3 microkeratomes and the topographic changes induced by flap creation in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK).

SETTING

Cornea and Refractive Surgery Unit, Instituto de Microcirugia Ocular de Barcelona, Autonoma University, Barcelona, Spain.

METHODS

In this prospective consecutive nonrandomized comparative study, patients were divided into 2 groups. In Group 1 (75 eyes), 3 microkeratomes were used: Moria LSX One, Moria M2, and Amadeus (AMO); 25 eyes per microkeratome. Pachymetry was measured with a DGH pachymeter in the center of the cornea and 3.0 mm from the center at 4 cardinal points (superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal; 3 measurements at each point) before and after the cut. The flap thickness in each sector was calculated by subtracting the mean post-flap corneal thickness from the mean pre-flap corneal thickness. In Group 2 (33 eyes), the M2 microkeratome with a 130 microm plate was used to create a superotemporal hinged flap (9 eyes) or a superonasal hinged flap (24 eyes). The topographic change induced by the microkeratome cut was evaluated using 4 sequential data acquisitions by the Keratron Scout topographic unit (Optikon) before and immediately after the cut (before laser ablation). Cardinal and oblique astigmatism and change in the axis were calculated by vectorial analysis of the simulated keratometry. Topographic Zernike analysis was performed in a subgroup.

RESULTS

With the LSX One microkeratome, the mean flap thickness was 151.7 microm centrally, 161.9 microm superiorly, 151.4 microm inferiorly, 156.1 microm temporally, and 167.5 microm nasally. There was no statistically significant difference between the areas studied (P<.05). With the M2, the mean flap thickness was 131.7 microm centrally, 155.5 microm superiorly, 146.7 microm inferiorly, 143.7 microm temporally, and 160.5 microm nasally. There was a statistically significant difference between flap thickness centrally and in the other areas (P>.05). With the Amadeus microkeratome, the mean flap thickness was 140.0 microm centrally, 152.5 superiorly, 128.5 microm inferiorly, 145.0 microm temporally, and 147.0 microm nasally. Statistically significant differences (P>.05) were found in the 4 sectors of the flap. With vectorial analysis, there was no statistically significant difference between superonasal and superotemporal hinge placement in the cardinal and oblique components but there was a statistically significant difference in the axis change with both placements (P>.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The LSX One microkeratome was the most predictable. A significant difference was noted in all sectors except superiorly with the M2 and in all sectors with the Amadeus. No differences between nasal and superior hinge placement were found with the M2. Topographic Zernike analysis demonstrated a difference in the orientation of the induced coma as a function of hinge position.

Assessment of central corneal thickness using optical coherence tomography

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the capability of model OCT3 optical coherence tomographer to evaluate central corneal thickness (CCT) in normal human corneas in vivo and compare the results with the those of standard ultrasound (US) pachymetry and Orbscan.

SETTING

New York Eye & Ear Infirmary Resident Clinic, New York, New York, USA.

METHODS

The CCT in 22 eyes of 11 subjects was determined with the OCT3 (Carl Zeiss Meditec), Orbscan (Bausch & Lomb, Inc.), and US pachymetry (DGH Technology, Inc.). Three central corneal scans of each eye were obtained using the OCT3. First, OCT3 data were processed using the standard OCT software program (OCT3(std)). Second, OCT3 raw data were exported and measurements were repeated using Scion Image for Windows program (OCT3(sci)). The OCT3 and Orbscan results were compared with the mean of 5 US pachymetry measurements in each eye.

RESULTS

The OCT3(std), OCT3(sci), and Orbscan CCT measurements showed high correlations with US pachymetry (r=0.981, r=0.984, and r=0.942, respectively; P<.0001). Bland-Altman analysis showed a high level of agreement between US pachymetry and OCT3 techniques but not Orbscan. High repeatability for OCT3(std) (r(2)=0.05) and OCT3(sci) (r(2)=0.01) was also seen.

CONCLUSION

Results show the OCT3 is an accurate, noninvasive, and reproducible technique for evaluation of CCT.

Central corneal thickness: Will one measurement suffice?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the measurement of central corneal thickness (CCT) in a cohort of glaucoma patients over a 3-month period. Measurements were then applied to the criteria described in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).

DESIGN

Cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS

Fifty-one patients were recruited from a glaucoma clinic at Moorfields Eye Hospital. Central corneal thickness was measured using an ultrasonic handheld pachymeter by a trained observer. Patients' CCTs were measured at 2 consecutive clinic visits.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Mean central corneal thickness.

RESULTS

The readings showed clear fluctuation over the 3-month period, with a mean difference in corneal thickness of 9.6+/-26.9 microm in the right eye and 19.0+/-29.2 microm in the left eye. In addition, there was a systematic bias towards increased corneal thickness being recorded at the second reading in both eyes. This reached statistical significance in both the right eye (P = 0.02) and the left eye (P = 0.0003). The criteria used to categorize the risk of patients developing glaucoma in the OHTS were then applied to these results. On the basis of the second reading, 32% of eyes required recategorization in both the right and left eyes.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of CCT taken within a clinical setting by a trained observer may show significant variability. For CCT to become a valuable addition to the assessment of glaucoma suspects, more than one reading may be required. Failure to do so may result in misclassification and, thus, an inaccurate assignment of risk.

Keratoconus staging: a computer-assisted ultrabiomicroscopic method compared with videokeratographic analysis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to introduce a new paradigm for keratoconus assessment, the keratoconus index (KI), generated from the ratio of peripheral corneal thickness (PCT) to the thinnest corneal thickness (TCT), and calculated by a computer-assisted procedure after ultrabiomicroscope (UBM) examination. Then we compared KI and the keratoconus severity index (KSI), obtained by videokeratography in patients with different stages of keratoconus.

METHODS

We studied 60 eyes with different forms of keratoconus using the TMS-3 autotopographer, provided with a keratoconus screening program (using Smolek-Klyce methods) and the commercial version of the ultrasound biomicroscope (Paradigm UBM Plus Model P45) equipped with a 50-MHz probe, which was provided with our computer-assisted program. The proportion test Z and the correlation coefficient R were applied to the outcomes.

RESULTS

The keratoconus severity index, KSI, obtained by color-coded videokeratographic maps, was in the range 95% to 32% (mean 52.22%). By means of UBM examination, we obtained 60 images and found values of TCT 0.278-0.592 mm and PCT 0.475-0.704 mm. Applying the computer-assisted method, we obtained values for KI of 1.112-2.159 (mean 1.428).

CONCLUSIONS

KI is correlated as well as KSI with the severity of the keratoconus (R = 0.76, P < 0.0001). It can be used as a similar parameter to measure the evolution of the disease, on the basis of corneal thickness rather than the curvature.

The effect of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurement in patients with corneal pathology

BACKGROUND/AIM

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements taken by the Goldmann applanation tonometer, the Tono-Pen and the ocular blood flow pneumotonometer in eyes with varying central corneal thickness (CCT) due to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), keratoconus (KC), and Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED).

METHODS

IOP was measured with the Goldmann applanation tonometer, Tono-Pen XL, and OBF pneumotonometer in 127 eyes with the following corneal abnormalities. There were 56 eyes that had undergone PK, 37 eyes with KC, and 34 eyes with FED. CCT was measured using an ultrasound pachymeter after IOP determinations had been made.

RESULTS

Mean IOP measurements in all three patient groups were significantly higher when measured by OBF pneumotonometer. Linear regression analysis showed that patients with FED had a significant increase in IOP with increasing CCT of 0.18 mm Hg/10 microm using the Goldmann tonometer, 0.15 mm Hg/10 microm with the Tono-Pen, and 0.26 mm Hg/10 microm with the OBF pneumotonometer. In patients with KC and after PK, linear regression analysis did not show a significant effect of CCT on IOP. A multivariate linear regression model controlling for age, sex, graft size, and patient group, showed that the effect of CCT on IOP for Tono-Pen (0.13 mm Hg/10 microm CCT) and Goldmann (0.14 mm Hg/10 microm CCT) were significantly lower than for the OBF pneumotonometer (0.26 mm Hg/10 microm CCT).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that mean IOP measurements using the OBF pneumotonometer were significantly higher than those made using the Goldmann applanation tonometer or Tono-Pen in eyes with a variety of cornel pathologies. The OBF pneumotonometer was found to be most affected by variation in CCT. For all three instruments, the relation between IOP and CCT depended on the corneal pathology and was greatest for FED.

Corneal thickness measurement by confocal microscopy, ultrasound, and scanning slit methods

PURPOSE

To measure corneal thickness by using a calibrated confocal microscope and to compare this measurement to thickness determined by ultrasonic and noncontact scanning slit pachymetry.

DESIGN

Comparison of corneal thickness measured by using four instruments in normal subjects.

METHODS

Thickness measured by a clinical confocal microscope (Tandem Scanning) was calibrated from measurements of polymethylmethacrylate contact lenses with known thickness. Corneal thickness was measured in one eye of 24 normal subjects by using this instrument, two ultrasonic pachymeters (DHG-1000 and Sonogage), and a noncontact optical scanning slit pachymeter (Orbscan II).

RESULTS

Mean corneal thickness measured by confocal microscopy was 516 +/- 30 microm (+/-SD). This was less than the mean thickness measured by both ultrasonic pachymeters, 554 +/- 28 microm by the DGH, and 555 +/- 28 microm by the Sonogage (P <.001). Thickness measured by the Orbscan II pachymeter was 540 +/- 35 microm (P <.001, compared with either confocal or ultrasound) after applying an "acoustic factor" of 0.92, a default correction of the software.

CONCLUSION

Corneal thickness measured by calibrated confocal microscopy is approximately 39 microm (7.0%) less than thickness measured by two commonly used ultrasonic pachymeters and approximately 24 microm (4.4%) less than thickness measured by the corrected Orbscan II pachymeter. These differences are important for planning and measuring the effects of refractive and other surgical procedures. The precision of confocal microscopy is limited by corneal motion in an anterior-posterior direction. The difference between instruments suggests that verification of clinical ultrasonic pachymeters should be revisited.

Central corneal thickness measurements with partial coherence interferometry, ultrasound, and the Orbscan system

OBJECTIVE

To compare the reliability of central corneal thickness measurements (CCT) obtained with partial coherence interferometry (PCI), ultrasound pachymetry, and the Orbscan system.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty healthy subjects with CCT measurements in both eyes.

METHODS

The CCT measurements were obtained with PCI, ultrasound pachymetry, and the Orbscan system. In each eye, 2 investigators performed 5 repeated measurements with each pachymetric device. Intraclass correlation coefficients (kappa) were calculated and mean CCT measurements were compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The CCT measurements obtained with ultrasound pachymetry, the Orbscan system (Orbtek Inc., Salt Lake City, UT), and PCI.

RESULTS

Mean CCT values measured with ultrasound pachymetry were significantly thicker than those measured with PCI (21.5 microm; P<0.001) or the Orbscan system (19.8 microm; P<0.001). The correlation coefficients for the intraobserver variability were 0.999 for PCI measurements, 0.983 for ultrasound pachymetry measurements, and 0.988 for Orbscan system measurements. The correlation coefficients for the interobserver variability were 0.998 for PCI measurements, 0.980 for ultrasound pachymetry measurements, and 0.988 for Orbscan system measurements. There was a slightly better consistency between ultrasound pachymetry and PCI (kappa = 0.96) than between the Orbscan system and PCI (kappa = 0.92) and between ultrasound pachymetry and the Orbscan system (kappa = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Partial coherence interferometry was the method with the least intraobserver or interobserver variability. Mean CCT as measured with ultrasound pachymetry was approximately 20 microm thicker than with the Orbscan system and PCI. However, corneal thickness measurements with ultrasound pachymetry and PCI were slightly more consistent than those of the Orbscan system and PCI. This slightly better consistency, however, may be important, especially in corneal refractive surgery.

Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility in the evaluation of ultrasonic pachymetry measurements of central corneal thickness

PURPOSE

To assess reproducibility of central corneal thickness (CCT) measurement by means of ultrasonic pachymetry.

METHODS

Fifty one volunteers underwent three sessions of CCT measurements, each consisting of three CCT measurements, performed by each of three different observers. Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was calculated by means of intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The expected range of variability between two independent evaluations was calculated using scatter plots of each test-retest difference against their mean. The standard deviation of the mean differences in the test-retest scores was used to describe the differences in the score spread.

RESULTS

The ICC ranges of the intra- and interobserver evaluations were 0.95-0.97 and 0.89-0.95 respectively; the expected variability was < or = +/-1% and < or = +/- 2% respectively (95% confidence interval).

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of CCT by means of ultrasonic pachymetry is highly reproducible.

Repeatability and reproducibility of the BVI ultrasonic Pachymeter

PURPOSE

To evaluate the interobserver and intraobserver reliability of a commercially available, portable, ultrasonic pachymeter.

METHODS

For the interobserver variability study, 42 healthy subjects underwent repeated ultrasonic pachymetry under topical anaesthesia performed by two observers. For the intraobserver study, another 30 further healthy subjects underwent repeated pachymetry by one of the observers. Agreement was analysed by means of Bland-Altman plots and by determination of the intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

For the interobserver variability study, the mean measurement difference between observers was 0.7 microm (95% CI -0.8-2.2 microm) and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.9958 (95% CI 0.9922-0.9977). The Bland-Altman plot showed narrow limits of agreement with respect to central corneal thickness (CCT). For the intraobserver variability study, the mean difference between the repeated measurements was 0.9 microm (95% CI -3.1-1.3 microm). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.9934 (95% CI 0.9863-0.9969). A Bland-Altman plot again showed narrow limits of agreement with respect to CCT. The mean CCT for 72 subjects was 538 microm (95% CI 528-545 microm).

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of CCT using the BVI Pocket Pachymeter were repeatable and had excellent interobserver reliability. Measurement variation amounted to less than 0.2% assuming a mean CCT of 538 microm.

Estimating residual stromal thickness before and after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE

To determine the factor(s) that influences measurement of residual stromal thickness (RST) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery.

SETTING

Clinical office-based excimer laser refractive surgery center.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative interventional case study of 6235 eyes, ultrasonic corneal pachymetry was performed immediately before and after flap creation and immediately after laser ablation in the primary procedure and after 647 enhancements. Differences in the methods for calculating RST were compared statistically.

RESULTS

Using the RST measured at enhancement as the actual RST, measurements of RST immediately after laser ablation underestimated residual thickness due to laser-induced stromal dehydration and microkeratome effects (P<.001). Estimates of RST using a "standard" or estimated flap thickness were less accurate predictors of residual thickness (P<.001) than use of the theoretical laser resection with a measured flap thickness (RST-4) (P =.78) or a modified flap thickness subtracted from the postoperative corneal thickness (RST-8) (P =.98), which provided the best RST estimates.

CONCLUSIONS

Before LASIK, the best means of estimating RST is to subtract the theoretical laser resection obtained from the laser computer and the expected flap thickness normally obtained with a given microkeratome system from the preoperative central corneal thickness. After LASIK, the most accurate means of calculating RST is to subtract the original flap thickness from the postoperative central corneal thickness.